15 Classic Onscreen Couples With the Wildest Age Gaps

Actors often aren’t the same age as their characters, something mostly seen when adults play teenagers. But if you take into account their real ages, it is a bit wild when you consider the age differences between certain on-screen couples. Granted, they often aren’t real couples, but it feels wild all the same.

Some might say that there is no age for love, and for starters, that’s a dangerous statement in a general sense. But with consenting adults, age gaps of 15 or 20 years mean a world of life experience that one side has over the other. These are the wildest age gaps we could fand in classic movies.

IMDb

Casablanca

Humphrey Bogart was 44 while Ingrid Bergman was 27 during the production of Casablanca. Their chemistry is legendary, but the 17-year age gap is much larger than many viewers realize when revisiting the classic romance.

IMDb

To Have and Have Not

In To Have and Have Not, Humphrey Bogart was 44 and Lauren Bacall was just 19. Their 25-year age gap raised eyebrows even then, though the pair famously fell in love and later married.

IMDb

Charade

Cary Grant was 59 when he starred opposite 33-year-old Audrey Hepburn in Charade. Despite a 26-year difference, their chemistry helped make the film one of the most beloved romantic thrillers ever made.

IMDb

North by Northwest

In North by Northwest, Cary Grant was 54 while Eva Marie Saint was 34. The 20-year gap is often overlooked because both performers brought so much charm and confidence to their roles.

IMDb

The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance

James Stewart was 50 when he appeared opposite 22-year-old Vera Miles in The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance. The nearly three-decade difference is striking when viewed through modern eyes.

IMDb

McLintock!

John Wayne was 56 when McLintock! was released, while Maureen O’Hara was 43. The 13-year gap is smaller than some others on this list, but it paired two classic stars whose screen chemistry often made audiences overlook their age difference.

IMDb

Sabrina

In Sabrina, Humphrey Bogart was 54 while Audrey Hepburn was 24. The 30-year age difference became a frequent topic among critics, especially since the film revolves around a romantic relationship.

IMDb

Never Say Never Again

Sean Connery was 53 when he starred opposite 24-year-old Kim Basinger in Never Say Never Again. The unofficial Bond film featured a 29-year gap between its romantic leads.

IMDb

But Not for Me

Clark Gable was 59 while Carroll Baker was 29 in But Not for Me. The 30-year age difference reflected a common Hollywood trend of pairing aging male stars with much younger women.

IMDb

Love in the Afternoon

Gary Cooper was 59 when he starred opposite 27-year-old Audrey Hepburn in Love in the Afternoon. Even Hepburn later admitted the 32-year age gap made the romance difficult to fully sell.

IMDb

Funny Face

In Funny Face, Fred Astaire was 58 and Audrey Hepburn was 28. The musical remains beloved, but its 30-year age gap is one of the first things many modern viewers notice.

IMDb

The Searchers

John Wayne was 46 while Natalie Wood was only 16 in The Searchers. Although the film’s romance is limited, the attempted pairing remains one of the more uncomfortable age differences in a classic western.

IMDb

Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner

Spencer Tracy was 67 when he starred opposite 39-year-old Katharine Hepburn in Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner. Their 28-year age difference was overshadowed by the film’s larger social themes.

IMDb

Man’s Favorite Sport?

Rock Hudson was 41 while Paula Prentiss was 25 in Man’s Favorite Sport? The 16-year gap was hardly unusual by Hollywood standards, though it stands out more today.

IMDb

Fedora

William Holden was 53 when he starred opposite 22-year-old Marthe Keller in Fedora. The 31-year difference fit a long-running pattern in classic Hollywood casting that audiences largely accepted at the time.

15 Actors Who Really Can’t Run

The way movies are made, characters running don’t always look right. There are countless reasons for this, and it’s usually not the actors fault. After all, you shouldn’t outrun the camera man, you need to remain in the frame, and a running scene is rarely done in a single shot.

This is why Tom Cruise and his Mission Impossible movies are so praised in the running department: it’s not just his individual skill (which we can’t deny), it’s also how the scene is filmed and edited. However, it’s still fun to point out silly ways of running, so here are some actors known for doing just that.

IMDb

Keanu Reeves

Keanu Reeves is famous for handling action scenes and firearms training with impressive skill, but some viewers have long joked about his running form. Clips from films like Point Break and John Wick regularly spark online discussion.

IMDb

Liam Neeson

Liam Neeson’s late-career action movies turned him into an unlikely action hero. While audiences embraced the tough-guy persona, his sprinting scenes have often been singled out by fans for looking slightly awkward.

IMDb

Steven Seagal

Steven Seagal’s running has become something of an internet legend. As his action career progressed, many viewers noticed that chase scenes often seemed carefully staged to minimize how much actual running he did.

IMDb

Nicolas Cage

Nicolas Cage commits completely to every performance, including action roles. Unfortunately for him, that dedication has also produced several memorable running scenes that audiences frequently cite when discussing unusual on-screen sprinting styles.

IMDb

Maggie Grace

Maggie Grace’s action scenes in the Taken films occasionally drew attention for her distinctive running form. Online discussions have repeatedly highlighted her sprinting sequences as unintentionally distracting moments in otherwise tense scenes.

IMDb

Ezra Miller

Ezra Miller’s run as Barry Allen in Justice League and The Flash generated countless memes. The exaggerated arm movements and unusual posture became one of the most discussed aspects of the character’s super-speed depiction.

IMDb

Robert Patrick

Robert Patrick’s run in Terminator 2: Judgment Day is memorable for a different reason. To portray the relentless T-1000, he trained extensively and developed an eerily efficient sprint that many viewers found unsettling.

IMDb

Leonardo DiCaprio

Leonardo DiCaprio has delivered countless acclaimed performances, but internet users have occasionally poked fun at the way he runs in certain films. His sprinting scenes often appear in compilations of unusual celebrity running styles.

IMDb

Zendaya

Zendaya’s running scenes have occasionally become a topic of online conversation, particularly among fans who noticed an unconventional sprinting style. The discussions are usually playful, but the clips tend to spread quickly.

IMDb

Danny Glover

Danny Glover’s Roger Murtaugh spent much of the Lethal Weapon series reminding everyone he was getting too old for this. His increasingly weary action scenes sometimes made his running look appropriately exhausted.

IMDb

Roger Moore

Roger Moore’s James Bond was known for charm more than athleticism. Producers reportedly used doubles for some running scenes, and fans have long noticed that Bond’s sprinting suddenly looks very different from shot to shot.

IMDb

Jackie Chan

Jackie Chan is one of cinema’s greatest physical performers, but his running style is unmistakable. His frantic, high-energy sprints became part of his screen persona and often added extra comedy to action sequences.

IMDb

Dylan O’Brien

Dylan O’Brien spent much of The Maze Runner franchise running from danger, which made audiences especially familiar with his sprinting style. Fans frequently joke that no actor has logged more on-screen miles.

IMDb

Ben Stiller

Ben Stiller’s comedic roles often lean into physical awkwardness, and his running scenes are no exception. Films like Along Came Polly and Starsky & Hutch feature deliberately goofy sprints that audiences still remember.

IMDb

Chris Evans

Even Captain America isn’t immune from internet scrutiny. Despite being convincingly athletic, Chris Evans has occasionally appeared in online discussions where fans debate whether his running style looks surprisingly unusual for a superhero.

15 ’90s Movie Stars Who Were Younger Than You Thought

Child stars often surprise us with their performances, not only for the quality of them, but for how young they were at the time. We are so used to seeing 30 year olds playing teens that, when an actual teen shows up on stage, we have a hard time believing it.

The more time passes, the more we let our perception get the best of us. These stars did incredible work as children and teens in the 90s, but we tend to think they were older than reality. These are the most shockingly young actors at the time of their performances.

IMDb

Natalie Portman

Natalie Portman was only 12 when filming Léon: The Professional and 13 when the movie was released. Given the emotional complexity of her performance as Mathilda, many viewers assumed she was several years older than she actually was.

IMDb

Kirsten Dunst

Kirsten Dunst was just 11 years old during the production of Interview with the Vampire. Sharing scenes with stars like Tom Cruise and Brad Pitt made her mature performance seem far beyond her age.

IMDb

Anna Paquin

Anna Paquin was only 11 when she filmed The Piano, a role that earned her an Academy Award. It’s still surprising to remember that one of the youngest Oscar winners ever was barely in middle school.

IMDb

Edward Furlong

Edward Furlong was around 13 when he starred alongside Arnold Schwarzenegger in Terminator 2: Judgment Day. His confidence and screen presence made many audiences forget just how young he really was.

IMDb

Macaulay Culkin

Macaulay Culkin became one of the biggest stars of the decade through Home Alone, but he was only 10 years old when the film was released. Carrying an entire blockbuster at that age remains remarkable.

IMDb

Christina Ricci

Christina Ricci was just 10 during the filming of The Addams Family. Her deadpan portrayal of Wednesday Addams was so iconic that many viewers remember the character as older than she actually was.

IMDb

Claire Danes

Claire Danes was only 16 when she played Juliet in Romeo + Juliet. Acting opposite a slightly older Leonardo DiCaprio, she brought a level of maturity that made audiences overlook her age.

IMDb

Leonardo DiCaprio

Leonardo DiCaprio himself was only 21 when Romeo + Juliet hit theaters. Thanks to his leading-man confidence, many people remember him as being much older during his early stardom.

IMDb

Joseph Gordon-Levitt

Joseph Gordon-Levitt was only 15 when 3rd Rock from the Sun debuted. Playing the most sensible member of an alien family often made him seem older than the teenager he actually was.

IMDb

Jodie Foster

Jodie Foster may have become famous in the 1970s, but she was only 29 when she starred in Contact in 1997. Many viewers assumed she was already a veteran actress in her late thirties.

IMDb

Alicia Silverstone

Alicia Silverstone was just 18 during the production of Clueless. Her portrayal of Cher feels so effortlessly confident that many fans remember her as being several years older.

IMDb

Elijah Wood

Elijah Wood was only 18 when The Faculty was released. Having already built a lengthy film résumé as a child actor gave him the presence of someone much older.

IMDb

Thora Birch

Thora Birch was just 16 when she appeared in American Beauty. Considering the film’s mature themes and her central role in the story, many viewers assumed she was already an adult.

IMDb

Jonathan Taylor Thomas

Jonathan Taylor Thomas was only 13 when he voiced young Simba in The Lion King. His performance became so ingrained in pop culture that it’s easy to forget how young he was.

IMDb

Haley Joel Osment

Haley Joel Osment was just 11 during the filming of The Sixth Sense. Delivering one of the most acclaimed child performances of the decade, he carried scenes with veteran actors while still in elementary school.

15 Photos from the Simple But Perfect 1970s Gaming Life

Gaming is now everywhere, particularly due to the fact that we all have smartphones. Between those devices, home computers, and dedicated consoles, we can game in a myriad of ways. And it’s not just accessibility: gaming has become much more ‘mainstream,’ to the point that a capital-G Gamer refers to someone that lives and breathes games, not just plays them.

But there was a time where this wasn’t the case, a time where the hobby was just starting. Home consoles weren’t as common as before, and computers were far more related to work than to leisure. These few pictures showcase a simpler time, where the word gamer wasn’t even being used.

r/OldSchoolCool/AimlessPeacock

The Novelty

It wasn’t all that weird to see adults play video games back then, particularly if they were tech enthusiasts. Even though only one of them is playing, you can see both of them marvel at being able to interact with something on the screen.

r/OldSchoolCool

Pong

Like many technological developments, the first recognized video game came about during military tech testing. Legend says it was created by a submarine radar technician, for both fun and to test the software.

r/OldSchoolCool/network_noob534

Couch Gaming

Even back then, couch gaming was definitely a thing. It involved using the family TV to play games until dinner was ready, or until someone wanted to watch the news on the device.

r/OldSchoolCool/eaglemaxie

Publicity

While gaming was a new medium, it was a fast growing one. Arcades were all the rage, and they quickly appeared in magazines and other publicity outlets being sold to potential buyers.

r/OldSchoolCool

Pelé Soccer

Many sports stars participated with Atari in showcasing sports games, with Edson Arantes do Nascimento, also known as Pelé, having a video game named after him. Winning the Soccer World Cup probably had something to do with it.

r/OldSchoolCool/Sunburys

Pinball Is Also Gaming

Nowadays, considering the humble pinball machine as part of gaming culture might seem quaint, but back then, you’d see a pinball machine as much as an arcade cabinet, if not more.

r/OldSchoolCool

Competitive Gaming

Yes, competitive gaming is as old as gaming itself. While some adults were into gaming back then, the competitions were held between kids and teens; the ones with the most free time to perfect their gaming technique.

r/OldSchoolCool/harleybug88

The Old Guard

As the 70s rolled around, more and more games were added to the arcades, each with a more modernized cabinet look. Even back then, Pong felt like the grandad of the other cabinets due to its more subdued design.

r/OldSchoolCool/midwifeatyourcervix

Christmas Spirit

Due to the decorations in the background, we can say that this picture takes place sometime around Christmas. We can see the start of kids no longer running around, but glued to a screen playing games all day.

r/OldSchoolCool

Publicity, Home Edition

Selling things for corporate conglomerates and selling things for home use are different monsters. Here, we can see the different actors, poses and even angle of the device shown to sell it, even though we are still talking about Pong.

r/OldSchoolCool/onepersononeidea

The Perfect Gift

Few things make a child happier than getting that gaming console they were nagging you about for days, weeks or even months. It isn’t just a toy, it’s a device that lets them embark on nearly endless adventures.

r/OldSchoolCool/vale_fallacia

In The Way

While kids certainly enjoyed games a lot, this one is a bit too young to have the motor abilities to use a joystick. Clearly the adults were playing, needing to stop since their toddler decided to explore the TV.

r/OldSchoolCool/Scott-Spangenberg

The Atari 2600, Today

All of the previous pictures were a window of the 70s, mixing nostalgia with a bit of a history lesson. This is the Atari console as a fan keeps it today, quite dusty, but still in perfect working order.

r/OldSchoolCool/Scott-Spangenberg

Handheld Football

Gaming on the go started with the rest of the gaming innovations in the 70s, but as you can see, the screen size is quite limited. It’s incredible to think about how far we’ve come today.

r/OldSchoolCool/ponz

Telstar Arcade

While having a home console meant not having to leave the house, the arcades still had the benefit of having fun ‘peripherals’ like steering wheels and guns. The Teslar Arcade aimed to bring that to user’s homes, to not much success.

Widow’s Bay’s Latest Twist Puts Mayor Tom in an Impossible Situation

This article contains spoilers for Widow’s Bay episode 9, “Emergency Shelter”

The penultimate episode of Apple TV’s phenomenal new horror-comedy series Widow’s Bay starts by confirming what everyone suspected when they first saw the hotel’s painting of Sarah Westcott Warren’s frantic escape from the island with founder Richard Warren’s kids, only for the camera to be drawn to the bottom right-hand corner of the painting, where a young girl reaches out to be rescued. This curse? Yeah, it’s far from over. One of Warren’s kids definitely survived.

After Wyck (Stephen Root) and Tom Loftis (Matthew Rhys) dug him up from his grave in surprisingly good condition, Warren (Hamish Linklater) was forced into a final death at sea during episode 7, supposedly ending his pact with the island’s demonic force. Yet his demise did not end the horrors of Widow’s Bay, something that Patricia (Kate O’Flynn) found out when she became the ultimate final girl in the Boogeyman-centric “Your Baggage” last week.

Indeed, Frances Warren survived Sarah’s fateful trip. As Rosemary (Dale Dickey) exhaustively takes us through her geneaology with the best TV slideshow presentation since Buffy the Vampire Slayer’s “Hush”, the excitement and trepidation grows between the gathered trio of Tom, Wyck, and Patricia as they discover Frances only has one living descendant still on the island: Tom’s elderly assistant Ruth Livingston, who is home alone during the biblical storm forcing everyone else to shelter underground until it passes.

It’s a surprising twist that subverts the audience’s expectations (and popular fan theory) that Frances’ last known descendant might somehow be Tom’s son, Evan. After all, that would be the worst possible outcome for Tom, who has put Evan through a rollercoaster of emotions in recent episodes, promising to take him safely off the island for the first time in his life, only to reveal that his mother didn’t die in childbirth as he’d always insisted. But with the curse still lingering, safe passage for Evan and everyone else born in Widow’s Bay is unlikely, including Bechir’s forthcoming baby with his wife Chelle. That is, unless Tom does the unthinkable and kills Ruth for “the greater good.”

Tom is now in an impossible situation as he grapples with the classic trolley problem dilemma. Will he sacrifice one person (Ruth) tied to a track by intervening and pulling the lever on a runaway trolley that is on course to collide with and kill a number of people tied to the other track? Or will he allow the trolley to continue and let the chips fall where they may, knowing he probably could have stopped it all from happening by acting when he had the chance?

Tom enquires about Ruth’s health, wondering how much time she realistically has left, while Patricia is astonished that Tom can even try to justify killing Ruth, the sweet old lady who bakes them birthday cakes and babysits Evan. “There are hundreds of lives at stake,” Tom explains. “And one of them is my son.”

Wyck sides with Tom as Patricia grows increasingly infuriated with the notion of killing Ruth, suggesting that doing so would make Tom a murderer. “When she dies, it ends. She lived a good life,” Wyck reasons, assuring Patricia that he’d have ended his own life if he’d turned out to be Warren’s descendant.

As the episode concludes with Tom making his way into the storm to find Ruth, it seems he’s already made his decision. We’ll find out what happens next in the finale of Widow’s Bay, but it looks like there’s no going back for the island’s beleaguered mayor, who seems determined to rid its residents of Warren’s demonic pact, no matter the cost.

Will Tom kill Ruth? Are there more twists yet to come? Drop your Widow’s Bay finale predictions in the comments!

Widow’s Bay concludes on Apple TV on June 17.

Jem and the Holograms Is Getting a Second Chance at Live Action

Jem and the Holograms will join Prime Video’s TV offerings of female-centered series that have seen massive success with Gen Z like The Summer I Turned Pretty and newest addition, Off Campus. Deadline broke the news that Amazon and MGM studios are starting the development process for a TV series based on the hit animation from 1985, Jem. This series adaptation is coming just over 10 years after the poorly-received film, directed by Jon. M Chu, hit theaters in 2015.

The Jem and the Holograms film has a truly outrageous rating of 22% on Rotten Tomatoes. Frank Scheck of The Hollywood Reporter said, “Not being part of the generation that watched the show, I can’t vouch for its merits. But it’s safe to say that it must be miles ahead of this wan, bloated screen version which forgoes the original’s sci-fi and thriller aspects.” Indeed, many fans of the original animated series criticized how far the movie strayed from the cartoon and bemoaned that the story wasn’t exciting enough to get a new generation on board. 

The original cartoon possesses elements of sci-fi through Jem’s holographic computer, which she inherited from her father and uses to live a double-life as the practical Jerrica Benton and her pop star alter-ego Jem. Jerrica raises money for the Starlight Foundation through her band and Starlight music, the recording company owned by her and her sister Kimber Benton

In the original animation, Starlight Foundation is a charity for foster girls created by Jerrica’s parents, Emmet and Jacqui Benton and continuing the foundation is an important part of the band’s mission. In the 2015 film, the Starlight Foundation is rebranded as Starlight Enterprise owned by antagonist executive Erica Raymond (Juliette Lewis), rather than a charity. Additionally, Jem becomes a popstar through a viral video of her singing that her sister secretly posts. 

The film clearly aimed to add a realistic lens to the sci-fi animated series as a manifestation of what a “Jem and the Holograms” band would look like in real-life and how that coming-of-age story might proceed, misinterpreting that the sci-fi elements may have been a more exciting aspect for fans than the production team realized. 

The project is pushed by Hasbro Entertainment with the married screenwriting duo Lisa Joy and Jonathan Nolan producing. The couple is known for creating successful series like Westworld for HBO and Fallout for Amazon. Jonathan Nolan has written scripts for several of his brother Christopher Nolan’s films such as Interstellar and The Dark Knight. Any casting has yet to be announced as well as any specifics to the plot and similarities to the original, but it is likely the producers will take notes from the 2015 film of what not to do. 

Star Trek: Strange New Worlds Writer Downplays Season 3 Criticism

Star Trek is about optimism, exploration, and boldly going where no one has gone before. Star Trek fandom is often about complaining. We’re not pointing fingers here; god and his starship know we have launched criticisms at Star Trek here at Den of Geek. Nor is this anything new. The people who make Star Trek have been told they’re getting wrong from the very beginning, when Gene Roddenberry had to scrap the original pilot to film a new one with William Shatner‘s James Kirk as captain.

For that reason, anyone who would make a Star Trek property must have thicker skin than most, and learn how to downplay most of the criticism directed their way. Still, we can’t help but be a bit concerned about Strange New Worlds writer and executive producer Bill Wolkoff’s comments about criticisms of season 3.

“There were some episodes that got criticized. And that criticism is very real for everybody,” he conceded to TrekMovie, and even acknowledged, “I do read the criticism, and I think about what that means for what my part telling that story was.” But he finally insists that “every episode that we did, we got there for a reason, and we operate as a team.”

To be sure, every season of Strange New Worlds has been criticized, from its recasting of classic characters, especially Paul Wesley as Kirk, to its changing cannon around Khan to introducing a musical episode into the franchise. And certainly, there is a loud, bad faith contingent that dislikes any time modern Trek gets remotely progressive, despite the fact that The Original Series and The Next Generation regularly pushed boundaries.

Moreover, much of the buzz around the first two seasons of Strange New Worlds has been positive. The show has been praised for its deepening of underdeveloped classic characters like Dr. M’Benga and Number One, for its reframing of Original Series concepts (see the season one finale, “A Quality of Mercy”), and for returning exploration to the heart of Trek. Heck, we even liked the “Sybok” name drop.

Then came season 3. Perhaps because of the confines of a modern 10-episode season, perhaps because of a desire to recreate the viral moments from season 2, season 3 swung wildly between goofy comedy and abject horror. “What Is Starfleet?” raised big questions that had always plagued the franchise and answered none of them, patting itself on the back the entire way, while “A Space Adventure Hour” made fun of Star Trek itself. “Four-and-a-Half Vulcans” had none of the fun of “Spock Amok,” while the finale “New Life and New Civilizations” raised the stakes to the point that the Enterprise was fighting the actual Devil and then hand-waved the resolution.

We could tell things were off early on, with the introduction of Dana Gamble, a young medical officer played by Chris Myers. Gamble is kind, enthusiastic, and smart, everything an ideal Starfleet officer should be. Which is why, of course, his eyes explode, he screams in pain and terror, and then gets possessed by the Devil to be the season’s big bad.

These complaints aren’t that Strange New Worlds isn’t real Trek, or that we don’t like the race or gender or sexuality of main characters. These are complaints about mechanics and tone, the fundamentals of storytelling. When fans complain that the stories feel sloppy, that they don’t give sufficient attention to the high stakes they raise or that they rely on jokes that make the characters seem dumb, they point to fundamental problems in the construction of the episode.

To dismiss the complaints by comparing the writer’s room to the Enterprise bridge crew and saying, “we have each other’s backs,” as Wolkoff does in the interview, suggests that jumping to warm feelings instead of dealing with the nuts and bolts of a problem isn’t just a storytelling choice.

Wolfkoff does admit that there are “some criticisms in season 3 that I took to heart,” but he doesn’t say which ones. And certainly, he’s just one voice in the room, a room filled with other writers whom he doesn’t, and shouldn’t, want to throw under the bus in this interview. But to disregard legitimate complaints and insist that everything’s fine because the people who make the show get along… well, that’s just as useless to Star Trek as endless complaining.

Star Trek: Strange New Worlds season 4 premieres on Paramount+ on July 23, 2026.

Disclosure Day Review: Steven Spielberg’s Coda to a Lifetime of Alien Movies

I always felt bad for Larry, Josef Sommer’s character in Close Encounters of the Third Kind (1977). In Steven Spielberg’s magnum opus about UFOs and the governments who cover them up, Larry is a true believer that, like Richard Dreyfuss’ Roy and Melinda Dillon’s Jillian, traveled all the way to Devils Tower in Wyoming, sneaking past federal authority checkpoints and lies… only to miss the aliens at the last minute because of some knockout gas.

That of course was part and parcel for Spielberg’s vision of an obsessive, almost maniacal need to know. Only the most dedicated, driven and, ahem, visionary folks like Roy get to learn the truth and board a starship with little gray men. Everyone else should be so lucky to see the epic John Williams concert and UFO light show at the top of the mountain. Otherwise we wind up like Larry: left behind in the dark, wondering what really happened on that evening of night skies.

The Spielberg who made Close Encounters is a different man. He’s indicated as much over the years by saying he regrets his amazing ending of Roy abandoning his life and family to go on a space odyssey. Becoming a parent in real life will have that effect. But he’s also become more fixated on the stakes of our world and society as a collective. The man who once made grandiose adventures about the lone individual facing nature in Jaws, or a little boy fixing his fractured childhood by befriending another extraterrestrial in E.T., has spent most of the last 20 years making dramas about who Americans are as a people, a culture, and (perhaps quaintly these days) a force for moral good. You watch how he frames Abraham Lincoln or Kay Graham, and you know he believes in the dream in his bones.

It’s so strong that his civic-minded egalitarianism has even drifted into the fifth(!) alien film in his career, Disclosure Day. In many respects, Disclosure Day positions itself to be a king returning to his throne. The paterfamilias of the modern blockbuster is reclaiming a style of moviemaking he perfected decades ago, yet has barely acknowledged at all in the last 15 years, save for 2018’s Ready Player One. But after two achingly personal passion projects like West Side Story (2022) and The Fablemans (2023)—alas two masterpieces that were sadly commercial flops—Spielberg is returning to his roots in a movie with car chases, government big bads, and of course aliens.

Yet the film is at its best when the director stops showing off the craft and a boundless energy that eludes men a third his age and instead pivots to the more magnanimous view of humanity, and for that matter aliens, which has evolved in the filmmaker’s later years. If Disclosure Day is a coda on the man in the beard’s fixation with unexplained lights in the sky, it is also a reclamation for the Larrys of the world; a wide-eyed, awe-inspired gaze into a future where no one gets left behind and the truth is shared with all. Human and extraterrestrial alike.

To get to that kind of graceful epiphany, however, Disclosure Day spends a lot of time running through some standard blockbuster storytelling, or at least what was the standard 20 years ago when Spielberg and other filmmakers were still making zippy escapism for adults. Two such grown-ups are Margaret Fairchild (Emily Blunt) and Dr. Daniel Kellner (Josh O’Connor). To the outside world, and even to the characters, these are two folks who should have little in common. Margaret is a professionally stifled weatherwoman at a local TV station in Kansas City who wants more out of her life; Daniel works for WARDEX, a government-adjacent agency that for the last 50 or so years has coordinated UAP research and cover-ups for the Department of Defense.

Yet Margaret and Daniel’s paths are inextricably linked after Dan goes the full Edward Snowden route and steals reams of classified documentation, files, and even video evidence that prove aliens are real, they’ve been visiting us for longer than there’s been a U.S. government, and we know where some of the literal bodies are buried because our leaders put them there. He even gets his hand on something that’s only cryptically referred to as… The Device.

Curiously, the moment Daniel and his mentor, an aloof but immediately endearing Colman Domingo, get the information out of government control is the moment that Margaret starts getting visions of repressed childhood memories and discovers she somehow can speak all languages and knows everything that can and will happen to Daniel—especially as WARDEX boogeyman Noah Scanlan (Colin Firth) begins closing in with his men in black. Noah isn’t without sympathy, but it has stark limits when he resorts to threatening (or worse) Daniel’s girlfriend Jane (Eve Hewson).

Longtime Spielberg collaborator and screenwriter David Koepp recently confirmed to me that the final scene of Disclosure Day is the first sequence Spielberg wrote. It is also one of the things that was left largely untouched after Koepp and Spielberg began reworking the director’s treatment. This shows in the final film. Without giving away what the finale of Disclosure Day exactly is, rest assured it features some massive secrets which allow Spielberg to return to the cinematic vernacular of 1970s cinema, both his own with his penchant for characters staring up in bewildered, wondrous close-up, as well as some of his contemporaries like Sidney Lumet and Alan J. Pakula.

It’s pure Spielbergian magic. The movie that gets to those final moments is a lot more checkered, although not without its charms and entertainment.

Blunt and O’Connor make for compelling leads who find themselves as the everyman and woman in extraordinary situations. Blunt, particularly, walks a fine line that skirts close to saying something sacrilegious or heretical as her mysterious and definitely alien-touched journalist carries an air of the prophet about her. There is something radical being teased by this characterization, but it’s perhaps intentionally left unexamined. Mostly the religious implications of what discovering aliens walking among us would mean for Old World texts and tenets are softly, even patronizingly slow-walked in a subplot involving Hewson’s Jane, a former novitiate nun who is forced to consider some profound implications about God’s Garden of Eden apparently being a lot bigger than the good book suggested.

But the biggest hurdles Disclosure Day faces is repeatedly raising some explosive ideas and then demurring from unpacking them. One glorious exception in the film involves a crackling intellectual confrontation between Firth’s cynical justifications for control and concealment, and Domingo’s full-throated advocacy for radical transparency and dissemination. Domingo is indeed the performance of the film, offering an avuncular and twinkly personification of truth-telling. His debate with Firth is about extraterrestrials, but one senses it is as much of a plea for humanity needing grown-up conversations about empathizing with their fellow man… and facing the unknown with a sense of charity and openness.

I honestly wish Domingo’s Hugo was the protagonist, and his motivations more front and center, as one senses that they’re Spielberg’s own convictions as well. But Hugo is ultimately peripheral to the central dynamics of Spielbergian everymen and women finding themselves in preposterous thrill ride sequences. At one point there’s even a rental car left dangling from the sides of a train.

Nonetheless, there is still some of that old school fairy dust from the storyteller who knows how to turn rolling boulders and bobbing buoys into cinematic legend. One sequence in particular involves Firth’s antagonist using “the Device” to manipulate a human character into acting against their self-interests is a tour de force scene of dread and violation. Bright and shiny science fiction suddenly takes on an air of dark magic, or possession horror, and it is yet one more reminder that it’s a shame Spielberg himself never tried his hand fully in the chiller genre.

What makes Disclosure Day ultimately worthwhile, however, exists beyond the thrills. This is a movie with a warm, even grandfatherly sense of equanimity to it; of a storyteller bringing perspective and newfound affection to one of his favorite subject matters. The film does not seek to glorify UAP accounts like Close Encounters, or turn it into something sweet (E.T.) or horrifying (War of the Worlds). It is a movie that wants viewers to be radically open to all ideas and perspectives, even those that might seem scary.

It wants us all on that starship alongside Dreyfuss, and its effectiveness is self-evident when the ending holds out its hand and leaves you eager to climb aboard.

Disclosure Day opens on Friday, June 12.

Tom Holland’s The Odyssey Plea Is Gen Z’s Latest Attempt to Save Cinema

The kids are alright, at least as far as the movies are concerned. After years of speculation that too many video games and internet videos would make them disinterested in the theatrical experience, it turns out that Generation Z loves the movies, and movies on the big screen, in particular.

Case in point: the appeal that Tom Holland made to users of Letterboxd, the film-rating social media platform popular among teens and 20-somethings. Holland appeared to urge viewers to see the Christopher Nolan movie The Odyssey in different formats and to record their experience on the app. “For the first time ever on Letterboxd, you’ll be able to track and share the way you experience the film with a brand new digital punch card,” Holland declared, reading the site’s marketing copy, before issuing a challenge. “All of the formats for all your watches and rewatches—bragging rights fully unlocked.”

To be completely clear, Holland is fundamentally pitching a product here, not unlike when George Clooney flashes a smug smile talking about food delivery or Matthew McConaughey purrs about luxury cars. That’s nothing new.

What is new is the product being sold: going to the theater and watching The Odyssey in multiple different formats. Letterboxd knows that there is a market for people who not only want to see a movie on the big screen, but they want to see it in the best possible format. Moreover, they want to talk about it with their friends.

The choice of Holland as a pitch man is also interesting. Holland isn’t the star of The Odyssey; he plays Telemachus, son of the protagonist Odysseus (Matt Damon) and Penelope (Anne Hathaway). Yet, Letterboxd chose him, in part, over other big names like Damon, Hathaway, Charlize Theron, and Lupita Nyong’o because Holland is a Gen Z movie star, less like those elders and more like Zendaya and Robert Pattinson, who also appear in The Odyssey.

This trio is hardly alone. Long after Marvel and franchise films seemed to kill the movie star, replacing big names with recognizable characters, Holland, Zendaya, Pattinson, Timothée Chalamet, and Florence Pugh draw crowds on their names alone, a quality shared with the big names of earlier, healthier days of the movies.

The same is true of production companies and distributors, especially A24 and Neon. In the same way that MGM and Warner Bros pictures carried a certain pedigree in the Golden Age of the studio system, and that Miramax and New Line Cinema had in the ’90s, A24 and Neon have a cultural cache that gets attention, sometimes more than the stars or plot.

Even better, one look at the current box office shows that Gen Z isn’t just watching movies. They’re making their own, with Obsession putting new spins on old material and Backrooms bringing their interests to the screen. While The Mandalorian and Grogu, Mortal Kombat II, and Masters of the Universe—IP movies more associated with Gen X and Millennials—have all struggled to find an audience, Obsession and Backrooms are exceeding all expectations.

Of course, The Odyssey goes back far further than any of these generations, and director Christopher Nolan sees himself working in a classical tradition. But Holland’s plea shows that as long as Hollywood makes interesting movies with compelling ideas, Gen Z will show up.

Romy and Michele 2 Deserves a Theatrical Release

Back in the 1990s, films often found their audiences on home video. That was certainly the case for Romy and Michele’s High School Reunion, which didn’t do much in the way of business at the box office and wasn’t particularly well received by critics at the time either.

Nevertheless, people eventually discovered the movie, and it became an outright cult classic, spawning a made-for-TV prequel film and even a musical as audiences warmed to David Mirkin’s charmingly offbeat comedy about a pair of best friends (played by Mira Sorvino and Lisa Kudrow) who start to feel like failures when they get an invite to their high school reunion and decide to lie about their successes instead.

So, 30 years later, should the movie’s long-awaited sequel also go directly to homes and bypass theaters? No, but that’s exactly what’s being planned for it, with THR confirming that not only is filming underway on Romy and Michele 2, but it will stream exclusively as a Hulu Original on Hulu in the U.S. and on Disney+ internationally.

This is clearly a business decision that made sense to someone at 20th Century Studios. Someone will have sat at a big, fancy desk in an office somewhere at some point, telling a small group of gathered suits that Romy and Michele 2 won’t make any money with a theatrical release, and the best possible option is to dump it on streaming. I wasn’t in that meeting because I’m a normie who writes words on the internet, but because I get to write words on the internet without risking large sums of money in Hollywood, I’m about to tell those people why they’re probably wrong.

Yes, the first movie was a box office disappointment, but the people who originally grew to love it are now middle-aged adults, one of the only groups still happy to turn out for movies that appeal directly to them. Why are studios happy to spend around $200 million on a Masters of the Universe film after the 80s version flopped, but baulk at a theatrical release for a movie that has a relatively tiny budget in comparison? Romy and Michele 2 absolutely won’t do Avengers: Endgame-level numbers, but it doesn’t need to! It just needs to make a decent profit on that smaller budget, which seems entirely doable. Instead, the studio behind it has placed its importance solely on streaming subscriber acquisition and retention metrics.

Yet if it were only middle-aged people the new movie appealed to, you could probably tell me to do one. But Gen Z and Gen Alpha have also discovered Romy and Michele’s High School Reunion. There have been plenty of TikTok fan edits doing the rounds over the years. It’s a cult classic that has remained one for anyone who has stumbled across it because it’s genuinely fun to watch and beats with a heart that fundamentally cries out “just be yourself!”

The original movie was full of lively fashion choices and concluded with the message that you should dress how you want, no matter what anyone else thinks. Are you going to tell me that the costumes and aesthetic of both movies wouldn’t appeal to people of all ages who want to make an event out of attending a screening? The first image from the sequel even suggests that Romy and Michele are still walking their own fashionable path. With studios often relying on social media influencers to do some of their marketing, they have plenty to work with here.

Studios also seem constantly baffled that movies largely marketed at women make money. In terms of sequels, The Devil Wears Prada 2 just grossed $664.2 million. Bridget Jones: Mad About the Boy notched approximately $140 million worldwide last year. And Greta Gerwig’s weird, $1.4 billion-grossing new take on Barbie? They forgot it! “More toy movies!” was the answer. They learn all the wrong lessons.

It’s not just the type of audience, either; it’s the genre. Somewhere along the way, studios simply decided that comedies belong on streaming. This has created a self-fulfilling cycle: audiences stop expecting comedies in theaters because studios stop releasing them there. And when they do? Well, let’s look at this month’s Scary Movie. It’s not even a good film, but it still did remarkable numbers. Freakier Friday could have also gone directly to streaming, but instead made about $94 million domestically. The surprisingly great legacy sequel The Naked Gun also did well at the box office.

But let’s step away from the money side of things, which will nearly always be the studio’s focus. Ultimately, the people who shared 1997’s Romy and Michele’s High School Reunion, and who continue to share it, quote it, and talk about it like the cultural touchstone it actually was, deserve a chance to once again prove to studios that if we’re going to have belated sequels 30 years in the making, we’ll show up for them. This seems like a real missed opportunity to allow us the opportunity to do so.

Things Get Biblical in The Bear Season 5 Trailer

A first trailer for The Bear’s final season has arrived, and it sees our flat-broke gang fighting back a flood of biblical proportions in the restaurant as Carmy (Jeremy Allen White) gets ready to depart and find out who he is when he’s not cooking. If a flooded eatery isn’t enough to handle, Uncle Jimmy (Oliver Platt) announces he’s planning to sell the restaurant.

FX also released this official logline for the season: “With no money, the threat of a sale and a torrential storm in their way, the new partners must band together with the rest of the team to achieve one last service, hoping they’ll finally earn a Michelin star. Ultimately, they learn that what makes a restaurant ‘perfect’ might not be the food, but the people.”

Additionally, FX has confirmed that season 5 picks up the morning after the season 4 finale, when Sydney, Richie, and Sugar first learned that Carmy had quit the industry and left the restaurant to them, raising questions about the timeline of the final scene in The Bear’s one-off special, Gary, which was released back in May.

Gary initially went back in time and documented a road trip that Mikey (Jon Bernthal) and Richie (Ebon Moss-Bachrach) took just before Mikey ended his life. During their time together, Mikey had a breakdown while hanging out with Richie and told him he was going to be a terrible father just as his daughter was about to be born. The pair weren’t on speaking terms by the end of the trip, but the special ended with a flash-forward cliffhanger set in the present, in which Richie was shockingly T-boned by a vehicle at an intersection.

Richie shows no sign of any injuries from the accident in the trailer for season 5. Check it out below…

The first season of The Bear was critically acclaimed, hitting 100% on Rotten Tomatoes. It was followed by a second season that nearly maintained that at 99%, but many felt that seasons 3 and 4 saw a marked decline in the show’s quality, giving audiences more of a simmering vibe rather than the boiling point of the first two seasons.

The fifth and final season of The Bear premieres June 25 on Hulu/FX and Hulu on Disney+.

15 Questionable Pokemons Suggesting They’ve Run Out Of Ideas

Pokemon has been around for a while now, and with ten generations strong, there are a lot of creatures to choose from. Between starters, legendaries and godlike entities, finding your favorite Pokemon is not an issue. Finding the worstly designed ones is, sadly, just as easy.

Granted, you can still have fun with these little creatures, and they are likely someone’s favourite. Don’t let our opinion detract from your personal enjoyment. But there’s no denying that, compared to other creatures, these few lack some proper work.

wikidex.net

Klefki

Klefki is literally a ring of keys that collects other keys. While it has lore involving its habit of gathering metal objects, it quickly became one of the most cited examples of Pokémon fans arguing the designers were scraping the bottom of the barrel.

wikidex.net

Vanilluxe

By the time the line reaches Vanilluxe, players are looking at what appears to be a double-scoop ice cream sundae. It remains one of the franchise’s most debated and frequently mocked designs.

wikidex.net

Trubbish

Trubbish is a sentient garbage bag created from accumulated waste. Some fans appreciate the environmental theme, while others cite it as one of the clearest examples of Pokémon turning random objects into creatures.

wikidex.net

Chandelure

Chandelure is literally a haunted chandelier. Despite its surprisingly strong battle performance and interesting Ghost-type lore, its appearance often gets mentioned in conversations about how far Pokémon designs have drifted from their roots.

wikidex.net

Comfey

Comfey resembles a floating flower lei. While inspired by Hawaiian garlands, many players initially struggled to see it as a Pokémon rather than a decorative accessory brought to life.

wikidex.net

Sinistea

Sinistea is essentially a haunted teacup. Its unusual concept won over some fans, but others viewed it as another sign that designers were increasingly drawing inspiration from kitchen shelves.

wikidex.net

Flamigo

Flamigo generated discussion because it is essentially a flamingo named “Flamigo.” Many fans joked that the design looked less like a Pokémon and more like a regular bird with minimal changes.

wikidex.net

Dudunsparce

After years of anticipation, many players expected Dunsparce to evolve into something dramatic. Instead, Dudunsparce is largely just a longer Dunsparce, making it one of the most hotly debated evolutions in the series.

wikidex.net

Alcremie

A Pokémon based on whipped cream and decorated desserts was never going to be universally loved. While some players enjoy its whimsical appearance, others see it as one of the franchise’s stranger concepts.

wikidex.net

Eiscue

Eiscue is a penguin with a giant ice cube for a head. While its gimmick has gameplay value, many fans have cited it as one of the franchise’s strangest and least natural-looking designs.

wikidex.net

Bruxish

Bruxish was intentionally designed to look unsettling, and it succeeded. Its bright colors, human-like lips, and unusual facial features have made it one of the most polarizing Pokémon in the franchise.

wikidex.net

Falinks

Falinks consists of several tiny soldiers marching in formation. Some players love the Roman legion inspiration, while others joke that it resembles a group of unrelated creatures standing very close together.

wikidex.net

Gholdengo

Gholdengo evolves from collecting 999 coins, leading many players to expect something spectacular. Instead, they got a string-cheese-looking mascot that continues to divide opinion despite its competitive success.

wikidex.net

Stonjourner

A living Stonehenge-inspired monument is certainly unique, but many fans felt Stonjourner looked more like a walking landmark than an actual creature inhabiting the Pokémon world.

Voltorb

One of the original object Pokémon, Voltorb is essentially a living Poké Ball. Fans have joked for decades that it was created because the designers needed a mimic-style monster quickly.

14 Classic Stories That Disney Got Completely Wrong

When adapting a story, it makes sense to alter details here and there, particularly if you want it suitable for children. Some stories need more editing than others, but once you know the depths of how different Disney stories are to their original counterparts, you start to wonder what’s even left of the real tale.

We will always remember a story from its most iconic rendition, or at least for the one we witnessed first. In both cases, the answer to that question tends to be ‘the Disney version,’ but we need to remember there was an original out there, with an intention. These are the stories Disney changed the most, and not always for the better.

IMDb

Hercules

Disney’s Hercules turns the Greek hero into a lovable underdog battling Hades. In mythology, Hades isn’t the main villain, Hercules isn’t Zeus and Hera’s estranged son, and many of his most famous stories are far darker.

IMDb

The Little Mermaid

Disney gave Ariel a happy ending and a prince. In Hans Christian Andersen’s original tale, the Little Mermaid suffers heartbreak, fails to win the prince, and ultimately dissolves into sea foam.

IMDb

Mulan

Disney’s version adds dragons, villains, and a romance subplot. The ancient Chinese poem focuses more on Mulan’s military service and loyalty, with no Mushu, no Shan Yu, and far less fantasy.

IMDb

The Hunchback of Notre Dame

Disney transformed The Hunchback of Notre-Dame into a family-friendly adventure. Victor Hugo’s original story ends in tragedy, with major characters dead and little of the film’s optimism.

IMDb

Pocahontas

The real Pocahontas was around eleven years old when she met English settlers. Disney aged her up, invented a romance with John Smith, and dramatically altered historical events.

IMDb

Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs

Disney softened many of the grim elements from the Brothers Grimm version. The original queen faces a much harsher punishment, and several details are considerably more disturbing.

IMDb

Cinderella

Disney’s Cinderella is based partly on Charles Perrault’s version, but other classic tellings are much darker. In the Grimm story, stepsisters mutilate their feet and suffer gruesome consequences for their actions.

IMDb

Sleeping Beauty

The original tale behind Sleeping Beauty contains elements Disney wisely omitted. Earlier versions include betrayal, attempted murder, and situations far darker than the romantic fairy tale presented in the animated film.

IMDb

Pinocchio

Disney’s Pinocchio learns valuable lessons before earning a happy ending. In Carlo Collodi’s original novel, the wooden boy is far more troublesome, and the story contains considerably harsher consequences throughout.

IMDb

Tangled

Disney’s Rapunzel enjoys a relatively lighthearted adventure. In earlier versions of the fairy tale, Rapunzel becomes pregnant after meeting the prince, and the story takes a significantly darker turn.

IMDb

Beauty and the Beast

Disney’s adaptation streamlines a complicated French fairy tale. Earlier versions contain additional siblings, extended family drama, and magical backstory elements that were removed to focus on the central romance.

IMDb

Tarzan

Disney’s Tarzan focuses on family, adventure, and self-discovery. Edgar Rice Burroughs’s original novel is much more violent, with Tarzan displaying a ruthless survival instinct and participating in far deadlier conflicts.

IMDb

Alice in Wonderland

Disney combined elements from both of Lewis Carroll’s Alice novels while simplifying much of the wordplay and satire. The result is memorable but considerably different from the source material’s literary complexity.

IMDb

The Fox and the Hound

Disney’s film emphasizes friendship and reconciliation. Daniel P. Mannix’s novel is significantly darker, featuring a much bleaker tone and ending that differs dramatically from the one audiences remember.

Classic Photos of Peak Arcade Life from the 1980s

While there certainly are some arcades left in the world, the boom of ‘arcade life’ was, without a doubt, the 1980s. Kids and young adults would gather at these establishments and enjoy the wonderful pastime of video games, one quarter at a time.

There was a social aspect that was lost with time, particularly with the advent of the home console. Now, games are certainly social, but they don’t connect you as much with local communities. Going to the arcade was meeting like-minded individuals in your area, and these are the pictures that reminds us of the best of those days.

r/OldSchoolCool/fensterdj

A Watchful Eye

Kids loved the arcade life more than anyone else, but it was important to have someone watching over you at that age. Here we have a kid going through a complex game with their guardians watching.

r/OldSchoolCool/act1989

Innocent Violence

Age ratings weren’t a thing until Mortal Kombat came around, so before then, kids could access all sorts of violent games and have a blast. They weren’t full of explicit gore, but here we have a few kids enjoying Final Fight, a game not suited to them by today’s standards.

r/OldSchoolCool/1977Claudette

Nobody Around

It was hard to master a game at the arcade, not just for the money investment, but for the crowds that would gather wanting their turn on the machine. For this lucky guy, getting good at Karate Champ is no issue with nobody around.

r/OldSchoolCool/FewCap982

Table Play

Today’s leisure parlors have tables for duo play, but they are mostly analog games that are more similar to pool than anything else. Back when everything needed to be an arcade cabinet, some arcades were set as tables. The light from the ceiling would often make visibility difficult, hence why they were discontinued.

r/OldSchoolCool/segaboy81

Time Shared

Not all experiences can be shared, and the control scheme of arcade machines often made them a solo experience. But with racing games, sharing the wheel is almost natural, something this parent and child used as a bonding experience.

r/OldSchoolCool/lizard_king0000

Arcade Stance

The main demographic for arcades were children and teenagers, the latter more than the former. As such, the cabinets were made with their heights in mind, something adults had to suffer through with the famed ‘arcade stance.’

r/OldSchoolCool/tellman1257, Raymond Cooper

Arcade Hunch

Some adults could spread their legs and get into the proper arcade height, but for particularly tall people, this wasn’t possible unless you wanted to do the splits. Bending over the machine was far more practical, and yet more taxing on your back as a whole.

r/OldSchoolCool/forceduse

Steven Spielberg

Arcades were popular all over the world, and with everybody as well. While Steven Spielberg wasn’t going to a town’s local arcade, he did have his own personal collection at his house, something anyone that can afford it would do.

r/OldSchoolCool/whitemike40

Quarter Boys

Keeping people playing was part of the business, but having them go all the way to the counter for more quarters could make them think twice. That’s why there were people whose job was giving change to anyone that needed it on the spot.

r/OldSchoolCool/I_Only_Have_One_Hand

Black & White

Taking pictures in black and white is an aesthetic nowadays, and with all the color pictures around of the arcade days, you’d think this was a style choice as well. But back in the 80s, people still had black and white cameras, since the ‘upgrade’ to color wasn’t as instant as many would have you believe.

r/OldSchoolCool

Posing For The Camera

Arcade cabinets were everywhere, attracting potential customers. At this video rental store, these teens pose for a picture, eager to continue their games after the click is heard.

r/OldSchoolCool/CoffeeCigarettes4Me

Teaching The Craft

Here, a grown teen shows a small child how the game is played. Here’s hoping the kid was paying attention, because his turn to play wasn’t going to come any time soon.

r/OldSchoolCool/BullBoyXVII, Ira Nowinski

Contagion

Many adults enjoyed some leisure time at the arcade, but pictures showing many of them at the same time are rare. Exactly where these cabinets are installed might shed some light as to why no children are around, but at least everyone is having fun.

r/OldSchoolCool/DiosMioMan63

Action Pose

Getting too much into the action of a video game can make us do silly things, like moving a joystick thinking that moves the character faster. Well, the same happened back then, but we would move our entire bodies to ‘avoid’ upcoming bullets.

The 15 Most-Modded Classic Cars

There are plenty of cars that are legendary, at least for our own cultural standards, because of their classic look, feel and style. Such a legacy attracts people wanting to build their own tale from that base, so enthusiasts all over the world grab these classics and make them wholly different.

Most modifications involve chasing more horsepower, improving handling, personalizing the appearance, or building something entirely unique. These cars offer the perfect combination of performance potential, aftermarket support, affordability, or cultural significance. These are the models people can’t stop tinkering with.

YouTube/Shokan Visuals

Toyota Supra Mk IV

The fourth-generation Toyota Supra is practically synonymous with car modification culture. Its legendary 2JZ engine can handle enormous power increases, making it one of the most commonly modified performance cars ever built.

YouTube/Supercars4u

Ford Mustang

Few vehicles have inspired more aftermarket parts than the Ford Mustang. From drag racing builds to restomods and track cars, every generation has attracted enthusiasts eager to customize performance and appearance.

YouTube/Velgen Wheels

Chevrolet Camaro

The Camaro has been a favorite among modifiers since the muscle car era. Owners routinely upgrade engines, suspensions, and bodywork, creating everything from vintage street machines to modern high-performance builds.

YouTube/THE-LOWDOWN.com

Nissan Skyline GT-R R32

Nicknamed “Godzilla,” the R32 GT-R became famous for its tuning potential. Its advanced all-wheel-drive system and turbocharged engine made it a natural platform for extensive performance modifications.

YouTube/THE-LOWDOWN.com

Mazda RX-7 FD

The RX-7’s lightweight chassis and rotary engine have made it a staple of tuning culture. Some owners preserve the rotary, while others perform engine swaps that push performance to extreme levels.

YouTube/Kenyi Nakamura

Honda Civic

The Civic’s affordability and enormous aftermarket support helped make it one of the most modified cars in the world. Everything from daily drivers to race cars has been built from humble Civics.

YouTube/ThatManDerek

Nissan 240SX

Beloved by drift enthusiasts, the Nissan 240SX became a modification icon thanks to its rear-wheel-drive layout and adaptability. Engine swaps, suspension upgrades, and custom bodywork are especially common.

YouTube/Zephyr Designz

Volkswagen Beetle

The classic Beetle has been customized for decades. Hot rods, dune buggies, drag racers, and custom cruisers all trace their roots back to one of the most versatile automotive platforms ever created.

YouTube/Select Jeeps

Jeep CJ-7

Off-road enthusiasts have spent generations modifying Jeep CJ models. Lift kits, larger tires, upgraded suspensions, and engine swaps have made the CJ-7 one of the most personalized vehicles on the road.

YouTube/Gray Built Garage

Datsun 240Z

The original Z-car offered attractive styling and strong performance at an affordable price. Enthusiasts quickly embraced it as a platform for racing, engine swaps, and extensive custom builds.

YouTube/Four Speed Films

Chevrolet Corvette C3

The C3 Corvette became a favorite among modifiers thanks to its dramatic styling and V8 power. Owners frequently upgrade performance components while preserving the unmistakable look of the classic sports car.

YouTube/Totalcar.hu

BMW E30

The E30 generation of BMW’s 3 Series has become a favorite among tuners worldwide. Its balance, simplicity, and motorsport pedigree make it a popular choice for both street and track projects.

YouTube/MrBillyVlogs

Mazda MX-5 Miata

The Miata’s lightweight design and affordability have encouraged endless customization. Owners routinely modify suspension, engines, and bodywork, turning the roadster into everything from autocross machines to track-day weapons.

IMDb

Porsche 911

While many owners preserve them, countless Porsche 911s have also been heavily modified. Performance upgrades, widebody conversions, and restomod projects have become increasingly popular within enthusiast communities.

YouTube/Nicole Johnson’s Detour

Mini Cooper Classic

The original Mini’s compact size and racing history inspired decades of customization. Performance upgrades, rally-inspired builds, and unique cosmetic modifications have kept the tiny British icon relevant for generations.

12 Conspiracy Theories That People Still Actually Believe

For some people, conspiracy theories are a way of life, a window into the real world that the ‘powers that be’ don’t want you to see. They control us through countless means so we stay as sheep, with the perpetual ‘them’ acting as both wolf and shepherd.

That sentiment is one anyone can sympathize with; the issue comes when discussing what is being actually believed in. We can all agree there’s something wrong in the world, some general injustice, but the shape of the Earth, lizard men, and fantastical creatures living among us are borderline too silly.

IMDb

The Moon Landing Was Faked

Despite overwhelming evidence supporting the Apollo missions, some people still believe the Moon landing was staged. The theory argues that NASA fabricated the event, often citing supposed photographic anomalies that have been repeatedly explained.

IMDb

The JFK Assassination Cover-Up

Few conspiracy theories have endured as long as the assassination of John F. Kennedy. Many people remain unconvinced that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone and suspect a larger plot.

IMDb

Bigfoot Is Hiding in North America

Reports of a large, ape-like creature living in remote forests continue to fuel belief in Bigfoot. Enthusiasts point to eyewitness accounts, footprints, and blurry photographs as evidence of its existence.

IMDb

The Loch Ness Monster Is Real

For generations, people have claimed that a mysterious creature inhabits Scotland’s Loch Ness. Despite numerous searches and scientific investigations, believers continue to argue that Nessie remains undiscovered.

YouTube/Real Engineering

Chemtrails Are More Than Contrails

Some people believe the white trails left by aircraft are part of secret government programs. According to the theory, these “chemtrails” contain chemicals intentionally released into the atmosphere for various hidden purposes.

IMDb

Paul McCartney Died and Was Replaced

One of pop culture’s strangest theories claims that Paul McCartney died in the 1960s and was secretly replaced by a lookalike. Fans continue searching for supposed clues in Beatles albums.

YouTube/Places

The Denver Airport Has Hidden Secrets

The unusual artwork, architecture, and underground infrastructure of Denver International Airport have inspired countless theories. Some believe the airport conceals bunkers, secret facilities, or evidence of larger conspiracies.

IMDb

Reptilian Shape-Shifters Rule the World

Popularized by writer David Icke, this theory claims powerful world leaders are actually reptilian beings disguised as humans. It remains one of the most famous modern conspiracy beliefs.

IMDb

Princess Diana Was Murdered

The death of Diana, Princess of Wales generated numerous conspiracy theories. Some believers reject the official conclusion of a tragic traffic accident and suspect a deliberate plot.

YouTube/Real Engineering

The Earth Is Flat

Despite centuries of scientific evidence demonstrating Earth’s shape, a modern Flat Earth movement still exists. Adherents argue that governments, scientists, and space agencies are collectively concealing the truth.

IMDb

Elvis Presley Faked His Death

The King of Rock and Roll remains at the center of one of the most enduring celebrity conspiracies. Some fans believe Elvis Presley staged his death and lived in secret afterward.

IMDb

The Philadelphia Experiment

This legend claims a World War II naval experiment accidentally rendered a ship invisible or teleported it. Although historians have found no evidence supporting the story, it continues to fascinate conspiracy enthusiasts.

Resident Evil’s Most Overdue Remake Is Finally Happening

Some announcements feel surprising. Others feel inevitable. The reveal of Resident Evil: Veronica at Summer Game Fest 2026 falls squarely into the latter category. For years, fans have viewed the survival horror cult classic as the missing piece of Capcom’s remake lineup, making its long-awaited return feel less like a shock and more like a correction.  

Like the Resident Evil remakes before it, Veronica aims to strike a balance between nostalgia and reinvention. The eerie reveal trailer shows a modernized take on the original game, trading fixed-camera angles for a more immersive over-the-shoulder perspective, alongside updated gameplay mechanics, enhanced visuals, and a reworked narrative that expands upon the original game’s foundation. 

The original game, Resident Evil: Code Veronica, launched on the Sega Dreamcast in 2000 and despite its clunky fixed-camera and tank controls, has continuously rooted itself as a fan-favorite installment. The game continues the stories of Clarie and Chris Redfield in the aftermath of the Raccoon City outbreak seen in the second game, taking place during the later half of Resident Evil 3

The trailer for the remake begins with Claire investigating a dilapidated apartment building in search of her missing brother before slipping in a playful nod to Chris Redfield’s infamous “boulder-punching” reputation. From there, the scene shifts into a tense montage of reimagined locations from the original game. 

Along the way, players will uncover more of Umbrella’s far-reaching conspiracies and eventually cross paths with one of Resident Evil’s most iconic and well-loved villains: Albert Wesker. 

Unfortunately for eager fans, the ex-S.T.A.R.S. captain was not revealed in the trailer, but there was a brief appearance of another familiar foe, one that we saw not too long ago in Resident Evil: Requiem: the Grim Reaper of Umbrella himself, HUNK. 

Well, maybe. The gas-masked figure could also be Umbrella security officer Rodrigo Juan Raval who captures Claire and utters the very same “Don’t move” warning heard in the reveal trailer, despite HUNK’s iconic red-tinted lenses being emphasized too. 

As interesting as those character teases are, the bigger takeaway is how Veronica now fits into Capcom’s recent approach to the Resident Evil series as a whole. 

Once widely expected to follow the Resident Evil 3 remake in 2020, the project was ultimately skipped over in favor of Resident Evil Village in 2021 and the Resident Evil 4 remake in 2023. That extended absence only reinforced the sense that a Code Veronica remake had been left outside Capcom’s modern remake cycle for too long (27 years to be exact). 

Now with its return officially confirmed, Capcom is repositioning Veronica as a long-overdue addition to that remake lineup, framing the game once again as a pivotal segue that bridges the aftermath of Raccoon City’s destruction and Umbrella’s expanding global presence. 

Scheduled for release in 2027, Resident Evil: Veronica will launch on PlayStation 5, Xbox Series X|S, Switch 2, and PC.

Masters of the Universe Features an Actually Great Jared Leto Performance

This article contains spoilers for Masters of the Universe.

Turns out Masters of the Universe doesn’t have the power after all. After getting trounced on opening weekend by Scary Movie, a movie no one seems to want or like, Masters of the Universe will probably not make back its nearly $200 million budget. There’s a lot of blame to go around, and we could point fingers at the fact that someone (probably IP-holder Mattel) thought He-Man could be Barbie, or the fact that the franchise’s target audience is pushing 50 and would prefer to watch movies at home after mowing the lawn.

That said, there’s one person we can’t blame, and it’s the same person who almost always deserves the blame. Masters of the Universe is the latest franchise flop to feature Jared Leto in a prominent role, following Morbius, Suicide Squad, and Tron: Ares. In almost every one of those cases, Jared Leto is a detriment to a movie, a terrible over-actor who seems difficult to work with and whose Oscar win for Dallas Buyers Club ages worse each year. But he is genuinely great as Skeletor in Masters of the Universe, one of the film’s few consistent delights.

So-Called Star Power

The fact that Leto could be good on screen isn’t entirely a surprise. Even his greatest detractors have to admit that he’s great in My So-Called Life and David Fincher collaborations Fight Club and Panic Room (although half the appeal of the former comes from seeing him get pummeled for being too good-looking).

But most of his filmography is defined by poor choices in projects and worse decisions on screen. Lonely Hearts, Chapter 27, and Mr. Nobody sit forever unplayed on Tubi, and his tendency to overdo it stains even Blade Runner 2049, to say nothing of more flawed films like The Little Things. Leto’s off-screen behavior only exacerbates things, making his obnoxious behavior staying in character as the Joker the least of his issues.

On paper, Leto’s casting as Skeletor in Masters of the Universe sounds like a disaster. The franchise first came into existence as a toy line, and everything that followed—including the popular cartoon series that ran from 1983–1985—exists to advertise those toys. Skeletor may have been conceived as the ultimate embodiment of evil, the counter to He-Man’s square-jawed goodness, but he quickly became the paradigmatic cartoon villain: sniveling, comical, and cowardly.

By the time Leto took the part, Skeletor existed mostly as a meme, which means he may have felt the urge to play the character darker and more extreme than ever before. That must have been particularly true given the fact that fellow problematic fave Frank Lengella played the character with Shakespearean flair in the 1987 Cannon film. Before the new movie hit screens, one had to imagine Leto screaming at subordinates or tearing the skin off his face to go method for Skeletor.

The Greater of Two Ultimate Evils

Yet, what we get in Masters of the Universe is Leto being cartoony, self-aware, and genuinely funny. Take the character’s first major scene, after dethroning King Randor (James Purefoy). Skeletor delivers a triumphant monologue to the defeated king and then unleashes an evil laugh, a chilling cackle that builds and builds… until he realizes that neither Evil-Lyn (Allison Brie) nor any of the other minions are laughing with them.

The awkward banter that follows falls a bit flat, one of the many times director Travis Knight and his team of screenwriters get too condescending to the material. But Leto remains locked in, even as the scene itself breaks. He is ultimate evil, and he’s less embarrassed by the fact that he was caught babbling like a madman and more annoyed that his henchpeople don’t respect his power.

Even better is the movie’s stand out scene, when Skeletor invades the consciousness of He-Man (Nicholas Galitzine). As he forces He-Man to relive the various embarrassments he experienced as HR office drone Adam, Skeletor takes the form of onlookers. He suddenly appears in a black suit and tie, sitting across a restaurant booth on Adam’s terrible date. When Adam gets a dressing down from his boss (Sasheer Zamata), Skeletor bursts into the office wearing a short-sleeve button down and holding a mug of coffee, a la Bill Lumbergh from Office Space.

Silly as these scenes are, Leto keeps playing it straight. Skeletor doesn’t think these scenes are ridiculous. He thinks that they are one more opportunity for him to knock He-Man down a peg, to prove his superiority. And so Skeletor continues to growl monologues at his opponent, bragging about how Adam is weak and how only he, Skeletor, deserves to wield power.

Leto’s hardly the only charm that Masters of the Universe has. Generally, the costumes and art direction are delightfully candy-coated, Galitzine and Brie are game in very silly roles, and composer Daniel Pemberton channels peak Queen for something absolutely glorious. But none of these elements can overcome the film’s central flaws, its lack of thematic clarity and its overreliance on humor that’s too self-deprecating and cute.

Only Leto emerges unscathed, and we’re just as surprised as anyone else. Turns out, if you cover Jared Leto in special effects and surround him with a bunch of cartoon monsters, his over-acting fits right in.

Masters of the Universe is now playing worldwide.

Jacob Anderson Had Fun With the “Bitchier Side” of Louis in The Vampire Lestat

This article contains spoilers for the premiere of The Vampire Lestat.

The first two seasons of Interview with the Vampire detailed the turbulent relationship between the fiery Lestat de Lioncourt (Sam Reid) and the brooding Louis de Pointe du Lac (Jacob Anderson) from Louis’ point of view. But in the third season of AMC’s adaptation of Anne Rice’s book series, we switch to Lestat’s version of events following the pair’s reconciliation and the notable release of Daniel Molloy’s best-selling book about their relationship.

For the first time, we get to see how Lestat and other vampires perceive Louis rather than how he perceives himself, which Anderson says informed his portrayal of the character this time around.

“It’s something I’m very mindful of,” Anderson tells Den of Geek. “And it’s something that Sam’s had to be very mindful of and Assad [Zaman, who plays Armand] and Delainey [Hayles, who plays Claudia] – the way that these characters are framed – it’s such a deeply subjective show. It’s so deeply inside somebody’s mind and experience. That’s also part of the fun. You get to play a slightly different version of the character each time they appear, more or less.”

The Vampire Lestat‘s premiere catches up with Lestat as he makes his next move in a modern world where society isn’t quite convinced that vampires really exist, but Molloy’s interview has given them an inkling. Though Lestat and Louis are feeling amicable in the wake of their brutal split and renewed understanding during season 2, Lestat takes umbrage at certain aspects of Louis’ tale in Molloy’s book. Having been told from Louis’ perspective and therefore not events as Lestat remembers them, he disparages Louis’ interview in front of autograph hunters and sets the record straight by scrawling furious notes in his copy of the book.

But instead of hiding away until it all blows over, Lestat puts his ego front and center, joining a touring rock band and eventually going public with his true nature. It’s a move that further shakes up a historically secret vampire society after Molloy’s explosive interview. Rocking out on stage and goading local vampires, Lestat is done hiding. Yet he still keeps in contact with Louis, who seems much more light-hearted and casual than we’ve ever seen him before, even happy to banter with Lestat over the quality of his songwriting.

“The thing that I think I’ve sort of noticed only this season is that Louis speaks slightly differently,” says Anderson. “Lestat kind of portrays Louis with a lot more love than Louis ever portrayed himself. Louis always thought of himself as this purely brooding, repressed, angry, wallowing-in-sadness being. And actually, Lestat gives him back some of his essence. Some of the more playful and also fiercer side of Louis that we haven’t really seen.”

Reid describes this as a “bitchier side” of Louis, to which Anderson adds, “It was fun to go there a little bit.”

As our reviewer noted, Reid and Anderson don’t have much shared screentime in the first half of The Vampire Lestat, but there’s a lot to look forward to in the back half, as Lestat and Louis “work through their shared grief” about losing Claudia. Season 3 of Interview with the Vampire is also set to introduce Sheila Atim as Akasha, the mother of all vampires from Rice’s Queen of the Damned.

New episodes of The Vampire Lestat premiere Sundays on AMC.

TV Premiere Dates: 2026 Calendar

Wondering when your favorite shows are coming back and what new series you can look forward to? We’ve got you covered with the Den of Geek 2026 TV Premiere Dates Calendar, where we keep track of TV series premiere dates, return dates, and more for the year and beyond. 

We’ll continue to update this page weekly as networks and streamers announce dates. A lot of these shows we’ll be watching or covering, so be sure to follow along with us! 

Please note that all times are ET. 

Note: These are U.S. releases. For upcoming British releases, head on over here.

DATESHOWNETWORK
Monday, June 8Alice and SteveHulu
Wednesday, June 10My Family Season 2Netflix
Wednesday, June 10Outlast: The JungleNetflix
Wednesday, June 10The Rest Is FootballNetflix
Wednesday, June 10Rosario Tijeras Season 5Netflix
Wednesday, June 10Every Year AfterPrime Video
Wednesday, June 10All the Queen’s MenParamount+
Thursday, June 11Surviving EarthNBC
Thursday, June 11Sweet Magnolias Season 5Netflix
Thursday, June 11The Evil LawyerNetflix
Thursday, June 11Viral HitNetflix
Friday, June 12The PolygamistNetflix
Saturday, June 13My Adventures with Superman (12:00 a.m.)Adult Swim
Tuesday, June 16America’s Sweethearts: Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders Season 3Netflix
Thursday, June 18I Will Find YouNetflix
Thursday, June 18The Capture Season 3Peacock
Friday, June 19OasisNetflix
Friday, June 19Sugar Season 2Apple TV
Sunday, June 21House of the Dragon Season 3 (9:00 p.m.)HBO
Monday, June 22Rhythm + Flow: Italy Season 3Netflix
Wednesday, June 24The American ExperimentNetflix
Wednesday, June 24Another Self Season 3Netflix
Thursday, June 25FX’s The Bear Season 5 (9:00 p.m.)FX | Hulu
Thursday, June 25Avatar: The Last Airbender Season 2Netflix
Friday, June 26Life, Larry, and the Pursuit of Happiness (9:00 p.m.)HBO
Friday, June 26StrungPeacock
Saturday, June 27Agent Kim ReactivatedNetflix
Monday, June 29Adventure Time: Side QuestsDisney+ | Hulu
Tuesday, June 30Ruthless Season 6Paramount+
Wednesday, July 1Elle Season 1Prime Video
Wednesday, July 1X-Men ’97 Season 2Disney+
Thursday, July 2Survival of the Thickest Season 3Netflix
Friday, July 3Silo Season 3Apple TV
Thursday, July 9Little House on the Prairie Season 1Netflix
Thursday, July 9The Five Star WeekendPeacock
Sunday, July 12The Westies (9:00 p.m.)MGM+
Wednesday, July 15Ride or DiePrime Video
Thursday, July 16The HawkNetflix
Thursday, July 23Stuart Fails to Save the Universe (9:00 p.m.)HBO Max
Sunday, July 26The Walking Dead: Dead City Season 3 AMC
Sunday, August 2Lioness Season 3Paramount+
Monday, August 3Futurama Season 14Hulu
Wednesday, August 5Ted Lasso Season 4Apple TV
Thursday, August 13Tires Season 3Netflix
Sunday, August 16LanternsHBO Max
Wednesday, August 26One Hundred Years of Solitude: Part TwoNetflix
Wednesday, September 9Last SeenApple TV
Wednesday, September 16South Park Season 29 (10:00 p.m.)Comedy Central
Thursday, September 24A Different WorldNetflix
Thursday, October 15Crystal LakePeacock
Wednesday, October 21The Terminal List Season 2Prime Video
Friday, October 23Lupin Part 4Netflix
Wednesday, November 11The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of PowerPrime Video
Thursday, November 12The Good DaughterPeacock
Friday, December 25Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s StoneHBO Max

If we’ve forgotten a show, feel free to drop a reminder in the comment section below!

Want to know what big movies are coming out in 2026? We’ve got you covered here.

Ghostbusters: Night Shift Returns the Franchise To Animation, its Natural Home

For now four consecutive feature films, bustin’ has made audiences feel okay-to-bad. After the classic that is 1984’s Ghostbusters, the franchise has gone through multiple sequels and reboots, none of which have come close to recreating the magic of the first film. Conventional wisdom would say that Ghostbusters should be a one-off, and any attempt to expand the franchise wreaks of desperate IP-mining.

The announcement of the Sony and Netflix series Ghostbusters: Night Shift contradicts that wisdom. Night Shift will be an animated series, bringing the franchise back to its natural home. The series The Real Ghostbusters, which aired 150 episodes between 1986 and 1991, cemented the fact that the adventures of four regular guys dealing with supernatural effects work best as a cartoon.

To be clear, this does not mean that The Real Ghostbusters is better than the first Ghostbusters. The original Ghostbusters remains an incredible watch, despite its many flaws. The effects still look incredible, the jokes land, and the movie escalates the threat in way that satisfies blockbuster demands without compromising the everyman nature of the heroes.

It’s just that Ghostbusters shouldn’t work, and, by all accounts, barely made it to screen in the form that we know and love today. Originally, Dan Aykroyd—a true believer in all-things paranormal—designed a supernatural epic, and planned to cast his SNL co-stars John Belushi and Eddie Murphy. When Belushi’s death and Murphy’s rising star forced a change, the studio and director Ivan Reitman retooled, cutting down the script and giving Bill Murray plenty of space to riff.

We all know the result: an incredible comedy that somehow overcomes its jankiness, its pro-free-market, anti-EPA politics, and its absolute underutilization of Ernie Hudson to become an all-time great.

The Real Ghostbusters certainly had its own problems, including a copyright claim that forced them to add the confusing adjective to the title and Murray suing original Venkman voice-actor Lorenzo Music. But the series turned out to be exactly what the Ghostbusters needed, an engine for new spooky adventures for our heroes. Even the less-loved spin-off series Extreme Ghostbusters (1997) retained some of the charm of the first series.

At this point, we don’t know much about Night Shift other than the title and the creative team, but even that little bit of information has us feeling some optimism. The writing staff includes Elliott Kalan who, in addition to working on The Daily Show and the Mystery Science Theater 3000 reboot, wrote the oft-memed X-Men panel of Sauron extolling to Spider-Man the virtues of turning people into dinosaurs instead of curing cancer.

Furthermore, Night Shift comes right after Ghostbusters: Frozen Empire, a movie that only worked when it was doing Stranger Things-style adventures with the younger cast. Gil Kenan, who directed Frozen Empire, will be producing Night Shift, along with Jason Reitman (who directed the dire Ghostbusters: Afterlife—which was co-written by Kenan).

With these elements in place, Night Shift has the potential to be a great Ghostbusters entry, continuing the legacy of the cartoon shows and delivering on the promise of the movies.

The Boys Creator Defends Its Divisive Series Finale

After The Boys concluded its fifth and final season on Prime Video, fan reactions online were mixed. Some felt the popular series ended on a high note, while others were disappointed by what it delivered, believing the show’s marketing had hyped a more explosive swan song for Billy Butcher (Karl Urban) and the villainous Homelander (Antony Starr) following years of buildup.

The Boys creator Eric Kripke recently admitted to TVLine that he knows there are “a lot of unhappy people online,” but went on to make two points in defense of the finale.

“First, I’m just glad people are passionate, legitimately,” he said. “My job is to make people passionate about the work I put out. If they’re arguing about it and hating it and fighting, that’s all passion, man. You’re watching, and that’s all good. My job is to get an emotional reaction, not necessarily to dictate what that emotional reaction is.”

But Kripke explained that he has also learned many times that “the online world is not the real world.”

“We have way north of 60 million viewers, so that makes the online storm, which feels very all-encompassing, actually a fraction of a single percentage point,” he said. “Everyone’s entitled to their opinion, of course, and I’m sorry if I disappointed you, but it was the story I wanted to tell. You just have to put it into perspective of it being a reasonably small, vocal audience when the vast majority seem to be happily tuning in.”

Kripke also told the outlet that the writers had already worked out which characters were going to die in the series finale of The Boys, but that the hardest part of the writing process was making sure every character got “a moment to be cool” when Butcher and the gang finally went into the Oval Office to confront Homelander.

“They all deserve a moment to be cool, right? Everything from Ashley’s moment, to Huey having one last flash of genius with his understanding of electronics and equipment, to the ball gag, to Annie and The Deep, we made sure every hero had their moment.”

All episodes of The Boys are now streaming on Prime Video.

Sam Reid Reveals How the Gabriella Relationship Is Key to The Vampire Lestat

This article contains spoilers for The Vampire Lestat premiere.

In Anne Rice’s beloved book series The Vampire Chronicles, rebellious bloodsucker Lestat de Lioncourt gets drawn into some truly complex romances, but the third season of AMC’s Interview with the Vampire series, The Vampire Lestat, explores the most complex relationship of them all: the one he has with his mother.

It’s not until the final moments of the season 3 premiere that viewers get to meet Gabriella de Lioncourt (portrayed by Pride and Prejudice star Jennifer Ehle) after seeing Lestat intermittently text a mysterious lover throughout the episode. Fixated and yearning, Lestat clearly wants and needs to be reunited with this elusive figure from his past, as documentarian Daniel Molloy’s question of whether Lestat stuttered as a child is repeated until he finally does so when Gabriella emerges from the shadows.

Sam Reid, who plays Lestat in Rolin Jones’ triumphant adaptation of Rice’s books, understands his character’s nuanced and problematic past and present better than almost anyone, teases out how Gabriella factors into the restrained origins of Rice’s famous vampire.

“He didn’t know what to do with his life, and his mother took control of it and pushed him to become the thing that she wanted him to be or that she wanted to be herself,” Reid says. “He never got the chance to fully discover, and as soon as he got the chance to discover, he gets ripped away and turned into this other big monster, larger-than-life creature. That’s the thing. The joy of being able to play the fetus of what this overbearing character is. It’s really fun to go back-and-forth.”

The Vampire Lestat opens with Lestat beginning a personal recollection of his “failures” during this era of stardom and debauchery, having seemingly moved on from his flirtation with becoming a rock star. Showrunner Rolin Jones says that one particular piece of Gabriella’s dialogue in Rice’s tome helped craft the energy between her and Lestat, framing the season around the vampire’s perceived failures.

“It’s something that Gabriella (or Gabrielle in the book) says to Armand about working your way through failure,” Rolin notes, adding, “It was such a curious thing for her to say in the book. It’s pretty clear she didn’t think much of Armand. And then you realize that Lestat is sitting in the room when she says that. That cracked open the entire thing for me. Anne had placed that there, for me, magically, about ‘this is where you’re going. This is what we’re going to do, Lestat. Work through failure. Find yourself on the other side of that.'”

Though there might be some crucial therapy that Lestat is working through with his mother at this stage in his long existence, Reid is aware that Lestat and Gabriella’s romantic relationship is still pushing boundaries. Rice wrote Lestat to be Gabriella’s maker, saving her from death as her health rapidly declined, but this created an uncomfortable and complex dynamic between the pair as they seesawed between being parent and child.

“There aren’t a lot of real-world analogues for it but if you separate them all, there are,” Reid explains. “There’s the mother/son, and then there’s lovers and maker and fledgling. You put the three of those things together and play them all at the same time. Which is what this show is most of the time – you’re playing like five things at the same time. It’s really fun. It’s so complicated, it’s such a messy thing.

“To do that with Jennifer was just a total joy. Pulling and pushing and seeing where we could go and how far we could go. It’s an amazing bunch of dynamics we play. It’s not done for exploitation or to be shocking. It is fundamental to the character and structurally who he is and why he is as fucked up as he is. I feel like you learn so much about these characters going through that. It’s very uncomfortable to watch. But the book series has never been comfortable. There’s nothing comfortable about it.”

Reid also credits Rolin and writer Hannah Moscovitch for giving “humanity and depth to the trauma of carrying an incestuous relationship around with you your whole life,” adding, “Because you need your mother. You need that maternal love. You need to be receiving that love. And when it’s a sexual love that you are given, it’s very, very complex. Your whole relationship with your sexual identity is tied in with your desire to be loved as a child. You can’t get a more desperate need for a character to be loved by the masses for who he is.”

New episodes of The Vampire Lestat premiere Sundays on AMC.

Autographed MrBeast Trading Card Highlights Topps’ Latest Set

Once solely the domain of baseball players and movie cowboys, trading cards have become a more inclusive medium in the internet era. Now industry titan Topps Chrome is paying homage to some of the creators that helped build that modern internet era.

Launching on Wednesday, June 10, the second set of “VeeFriends” trading cards from Topps Chrome will include 13 “Content Condor’s Favorite Content Creators” insert cards that highlight notable internet personalities such as Mr. Beast, Gary Vaynerchuk, Kam Patterson, Jake Paul, Livvy Dunne, Mel Robbins, Chris Brickley, Cody “Clix” Conrod, and Kyle “Mongraal” Jackson. The content creator cards will include one main set and one autography-only set. Den of Geek was provided an exclusive first look at the sure to be highly sought after autographed MrBeast card.

2026 Chrome VeeFriends, Content Condors Autograph Parallel

The nine Content Condor’s Favorite Content Creators cards will be accompanied by four other chase card formats: “Erupt!” cards featuring 20 characters from the VeeFriends universe, “Comic Clippings” cards featuring cutouts directly pulled from VeeFriends Comics Issues 1–10, “Manga Speckle” featuring 100 characters reimagined in a manga art style, and “Chalkboard” featuring 20 characters sketched in chalk lines.

While the secondary market will make clear which of the 13 inserts in this second set of VeeFriends cards is most valuable, a signed MrBeast card is certain to be in contention for the top spot. Jimmy Donaldson a.k.a. MrBeast is the most successful online content creator ever by almost any metric. With 497 million subscribers, his channel is the most popular on YouTube and his Prime Video reality competition series Beast Games concluded its second season in February with the crowning of a $5 million dollar champion. 

“VeeFriends” is a character, storytelling, and collectible IP universe created by entrepreneur, author, and internet personality Gary Vaynerchuk a.k.a. Gary Vee. The brand features more than 250 colorful cartoon characters created and hand drawn by Vee. Every VeeFriend has its own personality and backstory and the characters are featured in comics, coloring books, trading cards, and other mediums. Vee has described the project as a cross between Pokémon and Sesame Street, with press notes stating that the VeeFriends bring “traits like empathy, patience, and kindness to life in ways that connect, resonate and inspire” while also giving “both kids and parents something to connect over.”

The second batch of VeeFriends cards will be available for purchase from Topps and Fanatics on Wednesday, June 10. The cards will also be available via VeeFriends live shows on Whatnot and Fanatics Live! and through retail sources Dick’s, Target, and Gamestop.