KPop Demon Hunters Stars Recall Dull First Introductions to the Characters

KPop Demon Hunters is a bona fide phenomenon. Since the Sony Animation film hit Netflix on June 20 of last year, it has broken streaming records, moved tickets at theaters, sold toys and records, and garnered awards recognition. More importantly, the film and its themes of acceptance have resonated with viewers from all sorts of walks of life.

But to those voice actors who brought Huntrix’s songs to life, the initial idea wasn’t that exciting. “The only information I got pertaining to the movie was very generic,” remembered singer and rapper Rei Ami, who provides the singing voice of Zoey. Regarding the trio in Huntrix, she told Variety that the casting notice just said, “KPop girl group, also demon slayers by night, powerful music, and they’re badass and cute.” For Zoey in particular, it read, “the only description I got was that this person needs to be able to sing in Korean and English, but they need to be able to rap extremely fast.” Yet, despite that bland description, Rei and her co-stars soon discovered something special.

Based on that description, it’s not hard to imagine the type of movie that Rei Ami and her co-stars thought they were getting. KPop Demon Hunters follows the titular musical trio, consisting of not just rapper Zoey (her speaking voice provided by Ji-young Yoo in the English dub), but also dancer Mira (speaking voice by May Hong and singing voice by Audrey Nuna) and frontwoman Rumi (spoken lines by Arden Cho and singing by Ejae).

When not selling out stadiums, the three women battle demons. However, Rumi must hide the fact that she too is part demon, a fact made harder to conceal by the arrival of a human-turned-demon named Jinu (Ahn Hyo-seop in spoken dialogue, singing by Andrew Choi) who leads a male act called the Saja Boys.

The film’s hit songs, especially “Golden” may be misconstrued as a generic “believe in yourself” anthem, the same sort of themes peddled by kids movies for the past several decades—the same sort of themes that could easily be delivered by characters who are, in the blank description, “badass and cute.”

But to her credit, Rei and her co-stars pushed further and found something richer and stuck with it. “I don’t know what this movie is going to do, but it’s everything I love in terms of animation. It’s a Netflix film. It’s music, and it’s based in Korean culture. It’s everything that I am,” she told herself. And even though she drew the line at one particular high note in the hit “Golden”—”I told my manager, Aaron Tropf, ‘Tell them Rei cannot hit this note. She does not want to hit this note'”—she put her strength into the part.

And now, Rei recognizes that the dare was with it, because the performers are experiencing validation. “It’s long overdue,” she declared. “We worked our asses off. We’ve had the door shut in our faces. We were told we were too little, too much.” And all that from a cast description for KPop Demon Hunters that was too little, but so much.

KPop Demon Hunters is now streaming on Netflix.

The Mandalorian and Grogu Will Bring a Star Wars Fan Favorite from The Clone Wars

For most people watching the latest trailer for The Mandalorian and Grogu, the exciting stuff is everything that’s always been great about Star Wars: the spaceships, the power of the Force, all the cool sci-fi updates to classic genre elements. But for a certain group of people, the best part of the trailer is the appearance of a gangly guy with a wide-brimmed hat on his head and a mutt by his side. For them, it’s all about Embo.

For the uninitiated, Embo is the frightening-looking figure who removes Din Djarin’s helmet midway through the trailer, breaking Mandalorian law but also revealing the handsome face of star Pedro Pascal. Even the neophyte viewer knows that the situation doesn’t look good for Mando. But for fans of Star Wars: The Clone Wars, Mando’s bad luck is going to lead to a good time.

Embo made his debut in “Bounty Hunters,” the 2010 season 2 episode of The Clone Wars animated series. The episode finds Obi-Wan, Anakin, and Ahsoka arriving at a village where the desperate farmers have hired a quartet of hired guns for protection from local warlords. Although Embo is just one of the four new faces introduced in that installment, his stoic demeanor and general nobility—holding to a deal but willing to accept help from the heroes—won over fans.

After another appearance in season 3, Embo popped up several times in the show’s fourth season, truly standing out in “The Box,” which involved a competition between bounty hunters. Watching Embo hold his own against established killers such as Cad Bane cemented his legend.

For most fans, Embo carries a mystique that recalls the love original trilogy fans had for Boba Fett. As difficult as it is to remember now, Boba Fett was little more than a cool-looking guy standing in the background of The Empire Strikes Back who had to be warned by Darth Vader against going too far. Not even his ignominious end in Return of the Jedi, getting bumped into the sarlacc pit by a blind and bumbling Han Solo, or participation in the Star Wars Holiday Special could diminish his appeal.

For that reason, fans aren’t coming to The Mandalorian and Grogu looking to learn more about Embo. As long as he keeps looking cool, with his bowcaster on one side and his dog Marrok on the other, and as long as he makes Mando’s life difficult, that will be enough.

But will it be enough for everyone else? Created by Jon Favreau, The Mandalorian proved to be a hit for Disney+, in part because of the pop culture sensation around Baby Yoda and in part because the show went back to pulpy basics. But as The Clone Wars creator Dave Filoni developed a stronger voice in the series, it became more indebted to lore from that cartoon series and its sequel Rebels. Thrilling as that shift was for those who grew up with those shows, everyone else fell off of The Mandalorian.

As a major motion picture playing in theaters, The Mandalorian and Grogu cannot afford to cater to a select group of fans who loved a certain cartoon show fifteen years ago. So while the movie can absolutely bring in deep cuts like Embo, the reference alone won’t sell tickets. Then again, Embo has always make a strong first impression. That impression alone might be enough to make believers of everyone who watches The Mandalorian and Grogu.

The Mandalorian and Grogu comes to theaters on May 22, 2026.

28 Years Later: The Bone Temple – Jimmy Crystal’s Funniest Moment Was Cut from the Movie

Nia DaCosta’s 28 Years Later sequel, The Bone Temple, has no shortage of darkly comic moments. Though the film is also peppered with some absolutely brutal scenes of violence and gore, the director seems to understand how uniquely silly some of the characters are, as tragic as their circumstances might be. Still, one of the main characters’ funniest moments ended up on the cutting room floor.

The latest movie in the franchise focuses on the villainous Sir Lord Jimmy Crystal (Jack O’Connell) who fashions himself after the late, disgraced U.K. entertainer Jimmy Savile. The Bone Temple explores what happens when Jimmy happens upon the sweet-natured Dr. Kelson (Ralph Fiennes) and becomes convinced that he’s the devil who’s been encouraging him to torture and kill countless people across Britain, along with his gang, the Fingers.

But in a new deleted scene from the film, Jimmy’s daytime encounter with Dr. Kelson is cut short by the appearance of the roaring Alpha, Samson, who terrifies Jimmy enough to have him scarpering in a truly hilarious way.

Arguably, this would have ended up being the funniest Jimmy Crystal moment in The Bone Temple, but you can see why it was ultimately cut from the film, as it somewhat undercuts the seriousness of the conversation between Jimmy and Kelson. It also squashes Jimmy’s surprise at seeing Samson towards the end of the film, when he also mistakes him for the Devil.

The Bone Temple is the second movie in a planned trilogy written by Alex Garland. Danny Boyle, who directed the first movie, is planning to return to helm the third, which will see the return of Cillian Murphy’s character from the original film, though there has been some uncertainty around whether a third film would even happen, as The Bone Temple received critical acclaim but a disappointing box office haul. However, Sony still seems to be behind Boyle’s final entry in the franchise, and the director is reportedly planning a summer 2026 shoot.

Terminator Zero Cancellation: Creator Mattson Tomlin Shares Unfinished Plans

In 2024, the animated series Terminator Zero premiered on Netflix and did the seemingly impossible: it presented a thoughtful, well-structured story set in the Terminator universe that vastly outdid many of the live-action sequels.

Positive reviews soon poured in for the eight-episode show, which was developed by The Batman Part II writer Mattson Tomlin and featured animation by the esteemed Japanese studio Production I.G., but fans of the show were unhappy to find out this month that there would be no more of it, as Netflix has cancelled Terminator Zero after just one season.

Tomlin took to X for a post-mortem after the news broke, saying he might write a thread in the future about his planned five-season run of the show. “The series finale was special,” he said. “It was part of my pitch to get the job. I’ve written all of the season two scripts and outlined pretty much all of season three.”

There don’t seem to be any hard feelings between Tomlin and the streamer, however, despite the show’s upsetting cancelation.

“Netflix was really great about supporting the show and giving me tremendous creative freedom to do what I wanted to do. Good partners,” Tomlin wrote, explaining that the decision was down to the show being “expensive and very time-consuming” and that making more of the series depended on it snagging a bigger audience. “The only way they could justify it was if the audience showed up for it, and they just didn’t.”

Tomlin also noted that Netflix did offer to let him wrap up the Terminator Zero story with two or three additional episodes, but that he turned them down: “I felt the story I wanted to tell was much longer, and the finale of season one actually left things in a good place.”

Set around 1997 in Tokyo, Terminator Zero follows a resistance soldier named Eiko, who is sent back from 2022 to stop a looming catastrophe by protecting Malcolm Lee, a scientist developing a new Skynet rival called Kokoro. But as Judgment Day nears, Malcolm’s work also draws the wrath of a Terminator (voiced by Timothy Olyphant in the English dub), forcing Eiko to keep Malcolm and his family alive. Season 1 ended with Kokoro deciding to defend humanity from Skynet, and another attack looming.

The Mandalorian and Grogu Trailer Adds Baby Greedo to Star Wars

When The Mandalorian debuted in 2019, it leaned hard into the pulpy origins of Star Wars. Set to a Ludwig Göransson score that borrowed heavily from Ennio Morricone Spaghetti Western music, The Mandalorian followed the titular character as he walked into watering holes full of disreputable characters and sought out his bounty. But people didn’t really care about that. They cared about Baby Yoda, the popular (and frankly better) name for the creature he protects, the creature officially named the Child and then Grogu.

Creators Jon Favreau and Dave Filoni don’t use the name Baby Yoda in the title of their upcoming film The Mandalorian and Grogu, but they know what the people want. That’s why the trailer features a brief glimpse of an infant Rodian, a character we are going to call “Baby Greedo.” No, this child doesn’t shoot first, but he does look scared before being whisked away by his mother, and he does it adorably.

Baby Greedo is just one of the many creatures on display in the trailer. Sure, there’s a bit about a plot involving the bounty hunter Embo from (unsurprisingly) The Clone Wars cartoon series, as well as the Mandalorian Din Djarin (Pedro Pascal) facing off against Jabba’s son Rotta the Hutt (The Bear‘s Jeremy Allen White), who also comes from The Clone Wars, because of course he does.

But really, it’s all about the monsters. We get to see Hutt gladiators, a cool white sea serpent thing, some dinosaur-looking dude. Clearly, Favreau and Filoni have taken the lessons of the Mos Eisley Cantina and applied it to the entire film.

That aesthetic includes leaning into the cuteness of Grogu and Baby Greedo. As Djarin’s voice over suggests, Grogu is maturing into the powerful Force user we knew he’d become, and even if his attempts to lift a vehicle inspire more slapstick chuckles than they do awe, he clearly has great power. To underscore the point, the trailer features images of Grogu meditating serenely in a swamp, bringing to mind Yoda, or as we like to call him, “Grown-up Grogu.” And if that wasn’t enough, there appear to be multiple Anzellans like Babu Frik, bringing to mind the one redeeming feature of Star Wars: Episode Nine—The Rise of Skywalker.

But will it be enough? As Baby Yoda has matured into Grogu and as The Mandalorian became more a sequel to The Clone Wars, its appeal has been limited to Millennials who love the prequels and Filoni’s cartoons. Dedicated as they are, that audience may not be enough to make a major motion picture worthwhile. But maybe the sheer cuteness of Baby Greedo will make up the difference.

The Mandalorian and Grogu hits theaters on May 22, 2026.

Dreamcatcher Is Exactly the Stephen King Movie It Should Be

“I don’t like Dreamcatcher very much,” Stephen King said of his bestselling sci-fi horror book back in 2014. Written in longhand under the heavy influence of OxyContin, a medication that the author was taking after a car accident had left him severely injured, the book was certainly …something. Mind you, this remark about him not liking his book came more than a decade after it had already been adapted for the screen and he’d declared the movie version “one of the very, very good adaptations” of his work. Perhaps, then, we should view this as a very strange kind of compliment.

Indeed, the Dreamcatcher movie is also certainly …something. A largely faithful adaptation of King’s tome, it was directed by Lawrence Kasdan, who had previously found success writing Raiders of the Lost Ark and The Bodyguard. He co-wrote Dreamcatcher with legendary screenwriter William Goldman, and the film features a stacked cast that includes Timothy Olyphant, Morgan Freeman, Thomas Jane, and Damian Lewis. It’s no surprise that people were excited to see how it turned out.

However, there was still the actual King story to contend with, and what a story it is! We follow four lifelong friends – Jonesy, Beaver, Pete, and Henry – who share a mysterious psychic bond after saving a troubled boy named Duddits in childhood. Years later, they reunite for an annual hunting trip, only to find the area gripped by a deadly alien infection. Stumbling upon a disoriented stranger, they soon discover he’s carrying a parasitic extraterrestrial lifeform that violently bursts from the assholes of its human hosts. This “shitweasel” infection spreads rapidly, so the U.S. military quarantines the region to contain the threat.

The leader of the alien force is also revealed to be capable of possessing human bodies. It takes control of Jonesy (Lewis), using him as a host to finalize its evil plan. Jonesy battles the invader in a surreal “memory warehouse” inside his own mind, trying to regain control. Meanwhile, Henry (Jane) teams up with the adult Duddits (Donnie Wahlberg) to stop the aliens from contaminating a major water supply.

So what we have here is a lot of nonsense peppered with classic King dialogue motifs (“SSDD,” “fuck me Freddy,” “fuckarow.”) There are alien butt monsters, the U.S. military, a snowstorm, scenes set entirely in a character’s mind, and jarring Maine flashbacks that have to keep explaining who Duddits is and why his supernatural bond with the lads matters, because he’s going to come back at the end to save the day. To say all of this is messy would be an understatement, but when you know that King wrote this story while high as balls on OxyContin, I’d argue it’s all pretty easy to understand.

The movie also springs one bonkers filmmaking decision after another on us, as it should. “Sometimes you can underestimate what can be in a movie,” Kasdan told In Focus. “There were things in the book that I wanted in the movie that [Goldman] felt maybe couldn’t be in – and I sort of added them back.” He absolutely did, yes. And then some. For example, the character of Jonesy is an American, but when the alien leader, Mr Gray, possesses his body almost halfway into the movie’s runtime, it turns out that the alien has a clipped, Laurence Olivier-esque, 1930s British accent, which Lewis admits was “a kind of wild and surreal” decision, adding, “People jumped online afterwards and said, ‘Oh God, I really loved the film. But that Damian Lewis guy, what is that English accent? It’s totally unbelievable.'”

That’s right, the audience didn’t think Lewis – who is actually British – managed to pull off what was essentially his own accent. That’s how much whiplash Jonesy’s “tally ho!” handbrake turn into Mr Gray inflicts on viewers. And that’s hardly all. Jonesy’s mental memory warehouse, kept from the book, is also envisioned as a real warehouse where Lewis is seen pottering around, retrieving files full of exposition and plot twists. When we jump there, we don’t know if we’re about to see a deus ex machina or a flashback that derails the movie’s momentum. Elsewhere, Jason Lee’s performance as the somewhat underwritten Beaver is so surprisingly good that he blows everyone else off the screen. When he’s eaten alive by a toilet monster at the end of the first act, it leaves a sudden gaping hole (no pun intended) in the movie’s vibe.

Then there’s the U.S. military duo of Freeman and Tom Sizemore, who feel like they’re in a completely different movie. Dreamcatcher needs us to understand that Freeman’s Colonel Abraham Curtis is unhinged and that Sizemore’s Captain Owen Underhill is the only one who can stop him from nuking the infected site from orbit, but these roles are woefully miscast – Sizemore is not a natural straight man and Freeman seems extremely uncomfortable with the dialogue he’s been given as he rants about everything from his gun (he got it from John Wayne) to the reverence he has for American citizens “they never miss an episode of Friends,” all while trying to sell dialogue like “Bucko, I think we’re on the same page – pissing in the same latrine” with classic Freeman gravitas (he fails spectacularly.) Though Freeman said he got input on everything we see him do in Dreamcatcher, he also joked, “What if I said ‘paycheck’?” when asked what kind of genre it falls into.

We haven’t even gotten to Wahlberg’s performance as the adult version of Duddits. Here, the New Kids on the Block icon-turned-actor has the unenviable task of playing a powerful alien entity hiding inside the body of someone with a disability. Wahlberg said he prepared for the role by watching videos of kids with Down syndrome. Your mileage may vary with this one, folks, to put it mildly.

Taking all this into account, it will not shock you to learn that Dreamcatcher bombed both critically and financially. Not only that, it “wounded” Kasdan’s career considerably; it would be almost a decade before he directed another movie (the Diane Keaton-led dog rom-com, Darling Companion.)

Still, there’s something decidedly bold about Dreamcatcher that invites a reassessment, especially in the wacky, Scooby-Doo-riffing era of Welcome to Derry. You’ve got to admire (and dare I say, respect) Kasdan’s certainty that a story about a group of psychic friends dealing with an alien shitweasel invasion in the middle of a snowstorm, from the decidedly drug-fueled mind of Stephen King, would work on the big screen. I mean, it didn’t, but the movie remains massively entertaining because everyone seems to be having such a lot of fun with the deranged material. “I loved making that movie,” Lewis said, reflecting on the experience. “I loved working with Larry. It was a wild ride of a film; that script was a lot. But we had a great group of guys.”

Sometimes, that’s all you need. Sure, Dreamcatcher remains an unsubtle clusterfuck of a movie, yet at least it swings for the fences. With so many genres crammed inside it – alien invasion, body horror, psychic friendship drama, military thriller – it is absolute chaos, but that’s a feature, not a bug. And y’know what? With everything it’s got going on, at least you’re never bored.

Colossal Is Using New AI Tools That Might Just Save the Gray Wolf

The tooth-billed pigeon, which is sometimes referred to as “the little dodo” of the Pacific, is a variety of fowl indigenous only on the islands of Samoa. For more than a decade, it was also thought to be lost, if not outright extinct, after its last confirmed sighting occurred in 2013. That changed in 2025, though, when the Colossal Foundation—the conservation arm of the Texas technology company—introduced a new device to Samoa.

Described as a bioacoustics array derived from sound censors and a 360-degree camera mounted on top, this “classifier” is an AI-powered machine that has only begun to be deployed over the past 13 months at sites and national parks around the world. And according to Matt James, the chief animal officer of Colossal Biosciences as well as the executive director of the Colossal Foundation, it pinged the tooth-billed pigeon 43 times on its first deployment in Samoa alone.

“We know it’s out there,” James smiles while sitting across a conference room in Dallas. “So the next step [was] to get teams out there, go get eyeballs on them. And they’ve now seen them for the first time a month ago. It’s the first time in 13 years the bird’s been seen by a human, so the next step is can you begin to grab these animals and put them back into human care, so we can create captive breeding and release programs?”

That last bit might prove especially prudent considering one of the reasons the bird is virtually extinct is because an invasive breed of feral cat has flooded the island. It’s hardly an ideal situation, but according to the Colossal officer, it’s a chance to “bring them to human care, remove the cats, begin to build the population, and put them back in the wild, all because an AI tool is able to find it where nobody else could find it.”

It’s also a sample of work that might be less flashy than the de-extinction project that’s made Colossal famous after they brought a version of the dire wolf back from prehistory last year, but it has profound and immediate implications for species already here, from this relatively large pigeon in the South Pacific to elephants in Africa, and the much debated American gray wolf inside the continental U.S.

When we catch up with James, it’s during the recent grand opening of the Colossal Biosciences headquarters and laboratories in Dallas. We previously toured the campus last year when Colossal dominated social media with images of baby dire wolves—and Colossal CEO Ben Lamm remains adamant that the goal of having a woolly mammoth calf walking the earth again by 2028 remains on track. But it’s clear the technology company is at a pivot point following the last 12 months. The closest thing to a real-life Jurassic Park is now open to school tours, the world’s first permanent BioVault dedicated to preserving endangered or extinct genetic genomes is being established in Dubai, and as James muses, “[If] ’25 was about growth… ’26 is about delivery. It’s time.”

The foundation’s  “bioacoustics classifier” and the AI system it implements seems like one such device that can deliver sooner. Already its systems are being implemented in Yellowstone National Park in Wyoming, where it is being used to monitor gray wolves, and in the Samburu National Reserve in Kenya, where it is intended to study and protect the African elephant.

“We’ve developed it and we just give it to our conservation partners for free,” James explains. “The hardware is a piece that we will buy for them and then deploy it.” In Yellowstone, they’ve already deployed 55 classifiers, which create a grid system monitoring five kilometers each. “They’re really far spaced out,” James continues, “you don’t need a ton of them to do that, and so for $55,000, you essentially can cover all of the world’s largest national park.”

First deployed at Yellowstone in January 2025, the devices work by remotely connecting with a cell network which uses bioacoustics that record the sound of an animal’s cry to build and analyze spectrogram data, deciphering what is, say, a gray wolf instead of a coyote. The goal is for Colossal AI engineers to match that with a machine-learning tool that is able to individually distinguish a specific elephant or gray wolf, or pigeon, from another with a single drone image. According to James, when the bioacoustics classifier was first tested, it had a 96 percent accuracy rate, and that score has only gone up since it’s been refined.

The applications for such tools also expand far beyond just finding hard-to-seek species. The plan is to enhance the study of living animals, as well as mitigate potentially dangerous encounters with humans.

“So we now have a tool that basically can look at drone imagery, track elephants, and say we know exactly who this elephant is,” James notes. “What it begins to create is ethogram data, so it’s telling you behaviorally what they are doing. Right now they’re muddying, they’re flapping their ears, they’re all directing their attention to one individual in the herd. So [in our] partnership with Save the Elephants in Samburu, that’s giving them a lot of data to work on management.”

He continues, “But if you think about one of the biggest issues with elephant conservation and wolf conservation, it’s conflict with humans. If you can begin to identify, basically, the troublemakers in each group, you can create early warning systems for cattlemen in Montana or for crop co-ops in Kenya and say, ‘Hey, just so you know, there’s a troublemaker in your area, you should be deploying your mitigation tools tonight and avoid some of the conflict that results in elephant or wolf death.’”

The technology has so far not actually been used to mitigate conflict between ranchers and gray wolves in the American West—one of the continued flashpoints which contributes to the ongoing debate about delisting the gray wolf as an endangered species in 44 states—yet the intent is there to both improve relations with those worried about wolves attacking livestock, as well as a general public that might still view the timber wolf as a nuisance or monstrous beast.

“I’m hoping it creates an opportunity to understand wolf language,” says James. “When we start talking about language, it’s a great way to anthropomorphize a species that’s severely persecuted, wrongfully persecuted. And if you can create some compassion for this species, hopefully you’re reducing some of the persecution. Cattlemen probably don’t really care for that part, but if we can say, ‘Hey, it’s a great conflict mitigation tool,’ they care about that. [Meanwhile] the mass public says, ‘Okay, well, maybe wolves aren’t as bad as we thought they were,’ and I think that’s the winning combination.”

The technology already exists, and in fact appears to be the tip of the spear in introducing AI tools into conservation efforts. After all, James muses that Abhishek Jana, a senior scientist working in the Colossal Foundation’s AI unit, retrofitted the bioacoustics tech from being a “bird classifier” to a wolf-based device in a single weekend. “We literally said on a Friday, ‘Hey, can you make a wolf classifier?’ And on Monday, I had an email where he said ‘try this.’”

It makes the mind wonder about the implications a decade from now.

Wuthering Heights: Why Does Book Fidelity Seem to Matter Only for Emerald Fennell?

This article contains Wuthering Heights spoilers (as well as for Frankenstein and Dune).

Emerald Fennell’s relationship to Emily Brontë appears to be an estranged and distant thing. The Millennial iconoclast who once filmed Barry Keoghan getting intimate with the grave of his lost love in Saltburn would at a glance seem perfect for the English author’s portrait of multigenerational degradation. What is Wuthering Heights if not an godseyed view of several great houses slowly falling to ruin, which becomes complete when the Byronic antihero Heathcliff likewise digs up the remains of his great love? It’s about clinging tightly to the past until you’re in the ground with it.

Curiously though, that is not the movie Fennell chose to make. As was initially hinted by the filmmaker and Warner Brothers cheekily bringing back the title quotes on posters favored by Golden Age Hollywood publicity departments—think one-sheets for Gone with the Wind (1939), Warners’ own Casablanca (1942), or even William Wyler’s Wuthering Heights circa ’39—this “Wuthering Heights” is an unapologetic reinterpretation; a deviation; an outright reevaluation, even, which took the basic outline of Brontë’s story and reframed it in a narrative that better represented the themes Fennell wanted to explore: lust, love, and the maximalist ecstasy of a soul set free.

In my review of the film, I suggested it felt less like a 19th century story about tragic longing and repressed desires curdling into hate than it is a teenage daydream ocurring while listening to Kate Bush’s “Wuthering Heights” (also with the quotation marks) and imagining what the book is about. That apparently was not too far off the mark. In several interviews, Fennell has talked about coming to the novel at 14 years old and feeling transformed by its effect on her mind. She even said, “I think the things that I remembered were both real and not real. So there’s a certain amount of wish fulfillment in there, and there were whole characters that I’d sort of forgotten or consolidated.”

That tracks since so much of Fennell’s film deliberately evokes a fevered dream and the artifice of cinema classics of yore. There are the old Hollywood flourishes but also bits of surrealism, German Expressionism, and imagery that might look at home in a music video for the aforementioned Kate Bush. And whether you love Fennell’s indulgent sense of artifice, or find it simplistic since it glorifies a romance between two people who remain genuinely awful—with Cathy still played with self-absorbed vanity by Margot Robbie and Jacob Elordi’s Heathcliff staying gloomily transfixed by his grudges and hatreds for everyone around him—it is nevertheless a valid work of art from an artist who chased her own muses.

Yet so much of the criticism I have seen directed toward Wuthering Heights 2026, and Fennell in particular, seems less concerned about engaging with what she put onscreen than what she left out. Admittedly there are missed opportunities worth acknowledging. The loss of the central ghost story framework of the tale robs Cathy and Heathcliff’s doomed and damnable love story of some of its ethereal charm, as well as oblique perversity. Also while Heathcliff’s racial background is intentionally ambiguous on the page, refusing to let Heathcliff to appear as a changeling perceived as the “other” within the strictures of the landed English gentry deprives the story of the 19th century imperial desires and anxieties that Brontë exploited.

While Australian Elordi’s Heathcliff is lily white, Fennell intriguingly takes a “color-blind casting” approach to the characters who would seek to cast Heathcliff out into the cold: the rich aristocrat Edgar Linton (Shazad Latif) and Nelly (Hong Chau). The latter is Cathy’s maid and confidant who, in Fennell’s telling, proves to be as duplicitous as any of them. It is, in fact, this Nelly who deliberately betrays Cathy and Heathcliff’s trust at various points. Yet this shift does not evidently court any commentary on perceptions of race in Britain at the height of imperialism. Rather it seems designed to push the film further into the realm of distant fairy tale, where it is as divorced from a historical time and place as Cathy’s plunging necklines.

To critique the changes, or find them inferior, is fair game. But the vast majority of discourse around this Wuthering Heights seems specifically derived from the personal umbrage that the changes exist at all. The narrative seems less about whether Fennell made a good movie and instead that she had the audacity to make a movie tailored to her own tastes instead of that of English literature departments.

“Everyone hates the new Wuthering Heights trailer, and here’s why,” The Spinoff published five months before the movie came out. “Emerald Fennell’s ‘Wuthering Heights’ is objectively not Wuthering Heights,” opined CBC in a review that suggests the film’s changes are so head-scratching that they may eventually “lead to a brain injury.” Collider, not unfairly, surmised that Brontë is “rolling in her grave.”

Brontë probably is, to which I ask… so what?!

Why does it matter so much that Emerald Fennell personally deviated from an oft-adapted novel to craft her own maximalist fantasia? She is not the first filmmaker to take striking liberties with Brontë. In fact, it was not until the 2011 Andrea Arnold miniseries starring Kaya Scodelario and James Howson that a major adaptation attempted to cover the full multigenerational breadth of the book. Until then, most followed William Wyler’s lead from the classic 1939 Hollywood version starring Laurence Olivier and Merle Oberon by ending the story with Cathy’s death and Heathcliff’s plea she haunt him forevermore. Arnold’s miniseries also holds the distinction of being the first version to cast a Black actor as Heathcliff. Still, before and after we’ve had Ralph Fiennes, Tom Hardy, and Timothy Dalton, among others, play Heathcliff, and films like the ‘39 version which conspicuously soften Cathy’s selfishness or Heathcliff’s sadism.

Beyond Wuthering Heights, some of the most celebrated films of the last few years have taken just as much, if not greater, liberty with their source materials. Jacob Elordi indeed stars in another of them via Guillermo del Toro’s gorgeously realized vision of Frankenstein, for which Elordi might very well win an Oscar. His and del Toro’s interpretation of Mary Shelley’s Creature is full of pathos and elegant acting choices. They also choose to intentionally downplay the Creature’s flaws and failings. Hence in del Toro’s film, it is Victor Frankenstein (Oscar Isaac) who accidentally kills the woman he is in love with instead of the Creature cruelly and deliberately murdering Elizabeth on her wedding night to Victor.

Similarly, the year before, nerd culture generally was in geek cinema nirvana when Denis Villeneuve’s Dune: Part Two ended in tragedy as the Fremen warrior Chani (Zendaya) refuses to accept Paul Atreides’ wedding betrothal to a galactic princess as a political necessity. Instead she sees Timothée Chalamet’s Paul for the burgeoning tyrant most book-readers miss entirely when they finish Frank Herbert’s first Dune volume on the high of Paul defeating his enemies, and Chani happily accepting her lot as Paul’s concubine.

These are just a few of far more significant structural changes made both by del Toro and Villeneuve, whose shifts ran the gamut from changing the location and period (Frankenstein on the page is set in late 18th century Switzerland, not mid-19th century England) to omitting entire details like the tidbit of Paul and Chani having a young son who is murdered by their rivals in a novel that spans years, not months.

It is easy to wonder whether Fennell is held to a different standard than other filmmakers, perhaps because of her tendencies for decadence and excess (and questionable class subtexts) courting acrimony from a specific, popular lens of modern online criticism. Or, perhaps, it is because she’s a woman. Truthfully, though, it might be less about Fennell than the source material. While del Toro and Villeneuve, like Fennell, had intense formative experiences growing up with the novels they adapted, Wuthering Heights is a far more universal foundational text for thousands due to being on the English curriculum of most secondary or high schools on either side of the Atlantic.

Wuthering Heights has been read by more modern audiences than Frankenstein or Dune, or Dracula, or probably even Huckleberry Finn. To let Cathy and Heathcliff have sex on the moors is a bit like revealing to audiences that Ebenezer Scrooge is married. That’s just not the way things are supposed to happen!

But at the end of the day, art is much more fulfilling when engaged on its own terms versus comparing it side by side with a text. The best films based on books generally make mincemeat of their source materialThe Godfather, Jaws, The Shining—and as del Toro himself once said, “At the end of the day, I say adapting is like marrying a widow. You can pay respect to the late husband, but on Saturdays, you gotta get it on.”

Being able to get it on is one thing Fennell’s Wuthering Heights has no trouble with, especially when Charli XCX ballads drift across the 19th century moors.

Wuthering Heights is in theaters now.

10 Times De-Aging Graced Our Screens, For Better or for Worse

Digital de-aging has become a common tool in modern filmmaking. Studios use visual effects to make actors appear decades younger, whether for flashbacks, sequels, or full-length performances set in the past. The results vary. In some cases, the technology blends seamlessly with live action footage. In others, audiences notice stiffness, lighting inconsistencies, or uncanny facial movement. As visual effects budgets grow and software improves, de-aging has shifted from novelty to standard practice in major franchises. Here are 10 notable examples where filmmakers used the technique, with mixed reactions from viewers and critics.

The Irishman

Digital de-aging allowed decades to be shown on a single actor. The effect worked very well, staying mostly natural, though some facial movements look slightly off.

Gemini Man

Will Smith played both his current and younger self. The effect was visually impressive, but some critics found facial expressions slightly unnatural.

The Curious Case of Benjamin Button

Brad Pitt ages backward across the film. The de-aging was effective and contributed meaningfully to the story.

Tron: Legacy

Jeff Bridges appeared as a younger version of his character in certain sequences, blending CGI with performance capture, and the result was effective for action sequences.

Ant-Man

Flashback scenes used subtle de-aging to show younger versions of supporting characters without breaking visual continuity. The effect was barely noticeable, which worked in its favor.

Black Widow

David Harbour was digitally de-aged in flashback scenes alongside Florence Pugh, maintaining continuity without distracting from the story.

Captain America: Civil War

Sebastian Stan’s Bucky Barnes was de-aged in flashbacks to depict events during World War II. The effect was subtle and visually coherent.

Captain Marvel

Samuel L. Jackson was de-aged to play a younger version of Nick Fury, maintaining continuity with the character’s earlier backstory in the MCU. The result looked natural and consistent.

Guardians of the Galaxy Vol.2

Kurt Russell appeared de-aged briefly in a flashback scene to portray a younger Ego. The effect was limited but effective for storytelling.

Star Wars: Rogue One

Peter Cushing, who had passed away decades earlier, was digitally recreated to reprise his role as Grand Moff Tarkin.

Robert Duvall’s Most Famous Line is Richer and Sadder Than You Remember

The news that Robert Duvall has passed away at the age of 95 will certainly bring remembrances of the actor’s memorable performances. Films such as The Godfather, Tender Mercies, and Newsies will be mentioned alongside great TV work in Lonesome Dove and The Twilight Zone. And surely, someone will mention the most famous line that Duvall ever uttered, in his role as Lieutenant Colonel Bill Kilgore in Francis Ford Coppola‘s Apocalypse Now.

After storming a Vietnamese beach with Captain Willard (Martin Sheen) in tow, a shirtless Kilgore surveys the carnage and makes a declaration that has been quoted and parodied time and again: “I love the smell of napalm in the morning.” So famous is the line itself that people tend to forget what Duvall does after his declaration, in which he does some of his best and most subtle acting.

A Man for All Movements

Robert Duvall began his career in television, jumped to films with the 1962 adaptation of To Kill a Mockingbird, and continued doing great work well into his 90s, turning up in everything from Tony Scott‘s Days of Thunder to the Steve McQueen crime drama Widows. But he’ll always be best remembered as the ideal New Hollywood player. Duvall starred in George Lucas‘s film debut THX 1138, originated the role of Frank Burns in Robert Altman’s M.A.S.H., and played a studio boss in Paddy Chayefsky’s Network.

Duvall’s most famous work may be with Coppola, appearing in all four of the masterpieces that the director made in the 1970s. While he went uncredited in The Conversation (1974) and his role as Tom Hagen in The Godfather (1972) and The Godfather Part II (1974) are legendary, Apocalypse Now (1979) may be his best work.

A loose adaptation of Joseph Conrad’s Heart of Darkness transplanted into the Vietnam War, Apocalypse Now follows Captain Willard on a mission deep into the Vietnamese wilderness to assassinate the AWOL Colonel Kurtz (Marlon Brando). Along the way, Willard introduces viewers to the absurdities and excesses of America’s actions in Vietnam, none more absurd and excessive than the Ranger unit led by Duvall’s Kilgore. Willard describes Kilgore as a leader beloved by his men for his commitment to fun, trying to make the front feel like home. For example, when Kilgore learns about incredible waves in the area where Willard needs to go, he dismisses concerns that the Viet Cong (“Victor Charlie” in G.I. slang) control the point by bellowing, “Charlie don’t surf!”

It’s Kilgore who sends his choppers over the beach, set to the strains of Richard Wagner’s “Ride of the Valkyries.” It’s Kilgore who strips off his shirt and orders a napalm strike, all while stopping to hurry a Vietnamese mother and young child to safety and to urge a champion surfer in Willard’s charge to hit the waves. And it’s Kilgore who pauses a moment to enjoy the smell of napalm.

Quiet Within Kilgore

His chest puffed out and his arms on his side, Kilgore is all American pride. “That’s napalm. Nothing else in the world smells like that,” he tells his men, before crouching down to get closer to them. He almost casts aside the line “I love the smell of napalm in the morning,” getting it out of the way so he can recall for his men a napalm attack that wiped out the enemy before they could even fight them. Coppola and cinematographer Vittorio Storaro push the camera in on Duvall’s face as Kilgore wraps up his story, his vocabulary running out as he tries to come to the point. “It smells like…” Kilgore says, pausing and twisting his face as he looks for the right word to capture the magnitude of the moment. Finally, satisfaction fills his face and he allows himself a smile. “Victory,” he declares.

Kilgore follows up his statement with a small smile and nod, and then looks off into the distance to let the moment sink in. Despite, or because of, the mustard yellow smoke drifting past, Kilgore seems fully at home, if not happy, thanks to the twinkle that Duvall puts in his eye. A small explosion behind him doesn’t shock Kilgore out of his revery, but it does mark a change in Duvall’s body language. The beefy stance he once held has become limp, and the confidence on his face has dropped.

“Someday this war is gonna end,” he observes to Willard, with just a hint of frustration. He gives a consoling smile and nod, but even he can’t keep up the facade. Instead, he sulks away in frustration, tossing aside the bit of straw he had been chewing on, as if now embarrassed by all of his bluster.

The Real Within the Ridiculous

Apocalypse Now is an over-the-top take on a war film, and Colonel Kilgore is its most cartoonish figure. As much as writers such as Tim O’Brien have told us that the inexplicable happened in Vietnam, we viewers still have a hard time believing that the conflict would have someone who surfed in the middle of battle or blasted Wagner from his chopper. Even if an actor wanted to locate some humanity in Kilgore, they couldn’t find it with what was on the page.

And yet, Duvall plays Kilgore as a human. In those pauses, in the way he lets his eyes drift for a moment, in the way that his body goes from puffed up and proud to slack, Duvall reveals that there’s a vulnerable person behind all the bluster. Colonel Kilgore may desperately want to be the type of man who has so little fear that he can surf in a war zone, the type of man who doesn’t care about the devastation around him, but those tiny choices that Duvall makes reveal it all to be an act. Kilgore is in fact a human being, capable of empathy. It’s just that he’s a human being in a conflict where empathy is even more absurd than the battle itself.

Such decisions were the hallmarks of Duvall’s career. With just the movement of his eyes, Duvall could suggest layers, even with characters that feel like one-note jerks, loudmouths, and buffoons. Duvall always brought humanity to the screen and, without him, we are all a little less human.

Spider-Man: Brand New Day Promo Leaks Reveal New Foes

The final moments of Spider-Man: No Way Home sure felt triumphant, but anyone who knows about the ol’ Parker luck that’s plagued Peter his entire life could tell that bad things were coming. Like his comic book counterpart, the MCU Spider-Man played by Tom Holland was living in a New York squalor, and no longer had the benefit of Tony Stark‘s fortunes or the Avengers, let alone other Spider-Men. If the villains decide to team-up again, then Peter’s going to have his hands full.

It sounds like that’s exactly what’s going to happen in Spider-Man: Brand New Day. And thanks to some leaked merchandise material, we finally get to see some of the baddies making Peter’s life difficult in Brand New Day. In addition to an image of Spidey and the Hulk, we can see silhouettes of Tarantula, Scorpion, and Boomerang, which match leaked full-color images of the characters. The pictures also coincide with a leaked still of Spider-Man battling against Tombstone.

These deadly foes of Spider-Man are enough to get comic book fans excited, but your average moviegoer probably doesn’t know why they should care about this quartet. These aren’t headliners like Green Goblin, Doctor Octopus, or Venom, the baddies who appear in just about every Spider-Man movie, TV show, or video game. These are mostly jobbers, but that’s the thing with Spider-Man: his jobbers are pretty fantastic.

Created by Jack Kirby and Stan Lee for Tales to Astonish #81 (1966), Boomerang first appeared as a hired gun for an underground group called the Secret Empire. An Australian pitcher called Frederick Myers, Boomerang turned to crime when his baseball career stalled out. Originally, he threw small red discs more than he did his titular weapon, but by the time he became a regular pain in Spidey’s neck, Boomerang primarily relied on his titular weapon.

Introduced in 1974’s Amazing Spider-Man #134, by Gerry Conway and Ross Andru, Tarantula is just as unsuccessful as Boomerang, but far more serious. Born Anton Miguel Rodriquez, Tarantula was a freedom fighter who turned against the revolutionaries to join a fascist regime, becoming their version of a Captain America-type nationalist hero. However, Tarantula lacks any powers beyond being a really good fighter, which made his occasional trips to New York City unimpressive, as Spider-Man is also a really good fighter and he has spider-powers.

Of the three seen in the background image, Scorpion is both the most formidable and the most recognizable. In fact, we’ve already met Scorpion way back in Spider-Man: Homecoming, where the still fresh-faced Spidey thwarted an arms sale involving Mac Gargan (Michael Mando). In a post-credit scene, Gargan shared a bad guy moment with Adrian Toomes (Michael Keaton), but he’s been missing until now. If the leaked pictures are any indication, Gargan will finally be in a variation of the Scorpion armor he’s been wearing since his first appearances in Amazing Spider-Man #19-20 (1964), by Steve Ditko and Stan Lee. In those comics, Gargan was given the armor by J. Jonah Jameson to take down the menace Spider-Man. We’ll have to see if the movies follow suit.

Although he doesn’t appear in the main leaked merchandise image, Tombstone deserves attention here too, if only because he’s rumored to be the major antagonist of Brand New Day. A background character in Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse and a major character in Your Friendly Neighborhood Spider-Man, Tombstone is a gangster with nearly invulnerable skin. Although he usually concerns himself with street-level crimes (and sometimes antagonizing his childhood friend Robbie Robertson, a top editor at the Daily Bugle), Tombstone’s strength, durability, and general nastiness make him a challenge for Spidey. In Brand New Day, Tombstone will be played by Marvin Jones III, who recently did supervillain duty as Tobias “White” Whale on the CW series Black Lightning.

At this point, one might raise a concern about Brand New Day. We’ve got four villains listed here, and we already know that the film will also feature Mark Ruffalo as the Hulk, Jon Bernthal as the Punisher, and Sadie Sink as another super-character, likely Jean Grey of the X-Men. On top of that, Sink’s character will be pursued by the Department of Damage Control, potentially led by the character played by Severance breakout Tramell Tillman. Won’t these baddies get overshadowed by the bigger names?

They probably will be overshadowed, and that’s okay. Minor baddies are all part of the Spider-Man universe. They serve as opportunities to show that Spidey cares about street-level stuff, and as opportunities for Spidey to show his compassion toward losers who decide to put on a suit and make trouble for people.

With all of these guys running around, Peter’s life won’t be easy in Brand New Day. But it will fully and finally cement him as a properly friendly neighborhood Spider-Man.

Spider-Man: Brand New Day swings into theaters on July 31, 2026.

The Silence of the Lambs Star Admits Movie’s Gender Issues “Don’t Hold Up Too Well”

As we enjoy the record-breaking Oscars season that Sinners is enjoying, we should look back at the horror movie that finally got the Academy to pay attention to the genre. Released in 1991, The Silence of the Lambs won all the major categories, bringing home Best Picture, Best Director, Best Actor, Best Actress, and Best Adapted Screenplay, a rarity for any movie, let alone one about a guy who eats people’s livers with fava beans and a nice Chianti.

Yet, as The Silence of the Lambs celebrates its 35th birthday, some issues do stand out. In particular, some have argued that the gender identity of primary killer Jame Gumb a.k.a. Buffalo Bill demonizes trans people. Those critics include Ted Levine, the actor who played Gumb. “It’s unfortunate that the film vilified that, and it’s fucking wrong,” Levine told The Hollywood Reporter. “And you can quote me on that.”

Based on the novel by Thomas Harris, The Silence of the Lamb is best remembered for Anthony Hopkins‘s incredible performance as Hannibal Lecter, the brilliant psychologist who abides by a strict “eat the rude” policy,” and for his relationship to young FBI recruit Clarice Starling, played by an equally great Jodie Foster. However, Starling is sent to get a consultation from Lecter because the FBI is hunting Gumb, a serial killer who has kidnapped the daughter of a senator. Through Lecter’s analysis, Starling and her superiors learn that Gumb plans to make a female body for himself with the sinks of the women he killed.

“There are certain aspects of the movie that don’t hold up too well,” Levine said of that plot line. “We all know more, and I’m a lot wiser about transgender issues. There are some lines in that script and movie that are unfortunate.” In particular, Levine states that his own process of maturing and learning has forced him to reconsider the film. “Just over time and having gotten aware and worked with trans folks, and understanding a bit more about the culture and the reality of the meaning of gender.”

The portrayal of Gumb stems in part from the source material, as Harris has a tendency to embrace the lurid, pulpy side of things. Where filmmakers such as Ridley Scott, who helmed the sequel Hannibal, lean into the upsetting aspects of Harris’ work, Silence of the Lambs director Jonathan Demme tends to take a more humanistic approach, which made the connection between Gumb’s sexuality and his psychosis all the more upsetting. And while both the novel and the film explicitly state that Gumb is not trans, those lines alone do little to offset a long history of horrible portrayals of trans people, especially in pop culture. Movies such as Psycho, Dressed to Kill, and Sleepaway Camp have tied gender fluidity to murderous impulses.

Still, Levine isn’t the only person involved in the film to worry about its reception. During his lifetime, Demme had expressed regret over the way Silence of the Lambs invited further transphobia, and followed up that movie with Philadelphia, a far more sympathetic look at the lives of LGBTQIA+ people.

For his part, Levine still insists that his character wasn’t trans at all. “I didn’t play him as being gay or trans,” he pointed out. “I think he was just a fucked-up heterosexual man.” Maybe by the time it hits its 70th birthday, that will become the reputation of The Silence of the Lambs, that its not a portrayal of the dangers of a trans person, but rather a picture of a straight man who attacks women.

Halle Berry Recalls Her Showdown with Bryan Singer on X‑Men Set

Bryan Singer’s issues while working on the first two X-Men movies have been largely documented through revelations from various cast members over the years, indicating there were some tumultuous times on set with the director who first made a splash in the ’90s with the neo-noir crime thriller The Usual Suspects.

Singer hasn’t directed a movie since multiple allegations of sexual misconduct against him were recounted in a report from The Atlantic in 2019, but the stars of his blockbuster X-Men franchise installments haven’t forgotten what it was like to work with him back in the day.

Halle Berry, who starred as the mutant Storm in four of Singer’s X-Men films, recently recalled a time when she finally stood up to him on set, saying she told him “just where to go and how to get there.”

“Everybody was mad, but they all said to me, ‘Halle, you go tell ’em,’ because they knew I would. And it’s one of the greatest days on a set, telling someone who was wronging the entire crew, the entire cast, exactly where to go. And then I got on a plane and flew home with my X-Men suit on,” Berry told EW, adding, “I’m sorry, that guy deserved it.”

Nightcrawler actor Alan Cumming also remembers Berry’s showdown with Singer during the filming of X2 in his autobiography Baggage: Tales from a Fully Packed Life, claiming that Singer was using painkillers and would display erratic behavior that included disappearing from the set for hours. But when Cumming, along with co-stars Berry, Patrick Stewart, James Marsden, and Famke Janssen, staged an intervention in Singer’s trailer, he reacted so badly that Berry reportedly ended up saying, “I’ve heard enough. You can kiss my black ass.”

Singer also disappeared from the set of X-Men: Apocalypse circa 2015, according to star Olivia Munn, who said that he flew out to LA to see a doctor “and was gone for about 10 days.”

“He texted to the actors, ‘Hey guys. I’m busy right now. But just go ahead and start filming without me.’ And we’d be like, ‘OK.’ And I never thought any of it was normal, but I didn’t realize that other people also thought it wasn’t normal. And the other people who thought it wasn’t normal would be people at high levels, people who make decisions on whether to hire this person,” Munn told Variety, adding, “[I’ve] come to find out it is really strange and it wasn’t OK. But this person is allowed to continue to go on. Fox still gives him Bohemian Rhapsody, and then we all know what happened.”

Fox eventually dismissed Singer from the Queen biopic during production in 2017, citing his “unexpected unavailability.” He was then replaced by Rocketman director Dexter Fletcher, who completed the film. It went on to win four Oscars at the 91st Academy Awards.

What Went Wrong With Emerald Fennell’s DC Superhero Movie?

Back in 2021, Emerald Fennell was just starting her career as a feature filmmaker and had received fairly widespread acclaim for her directorial debut, Promising Young Woman. It was no surprise, then, that the world of superheroes came knocking, and the trades soon revealed that she was writing a Zatanna movie for Bad Robot and Warner Bros.

But as the years went by, it became clear that Fennell’s DC movie wasn’t going to happen. Instead, she poured her efforts into the 2023 psychological thriller Saltburn and this year’s Margot Robbie-led bodice-ripper, Wuthering Heights. Though DC fans have often been curious about what happened to Zatanna, it was widely believed to have been shelved during the DC reset that saw James Gunn and Peter Safran take over creative control of the studio.

Now, Fennell has revealed a bit more about her stab at Zatanna and why it might not have gained traction.

“I think it was demented because I was probably going through it at the time,” Fennell told the Happy Sad Confused podcast. “And the thing is, I think what I can’t help but—and then, I’d just finished Promising Young Woman, and there was this huge thing in this world I’d never operated in. And again, it was a kind of superhero movie, and I was like, ‘How do I make the version of a superhero movie that I would connect to emotionally?’ Which is sort of the woman in the middle of a nervous breakdown, so it’s a script reflective of a woman in the middle of a nervous breakdown. And in terms of what that means, I suppose it just meant that it was probably too far away from the genre.”

Zatanna Zatara has long been one of DC’s most iconic magic-wielders. Channeling sorcery by speaking spells backward, her powers range from teleportation and elemental control to reality-warping. Serinda Swan played a more low-key version of the character on the CW’s Smallville, but Fennell’s axed movie would have marked the first time she’d have appeared on the big screen.

Fennell describes her lost Zatanna movie as “really dark” and admits she hasn’t re-read her script for a long time because she found it “really difficult.”

“I love JJ [Abrams] so much, and he took a chance offering me to do it, and I really wanted to deliver something amazing for them,” she explained. “And I always felt like I hadn’t quite maybe delivered the thing that they wanted. So, I haven’t read it since, and I wonder if I read it now, I’d be more generous toward myself. But I felt like, I wished I’d been able to deliver the thing they wanted. They were really lovely about it, it’s even just remembering. You’re making me remember scenes, I’m like, ‘Nobody would have made that.’”

Wuthering Heights is in theaters now.

The Simpsons Boss Describes How the Show Would End

The Simpsons has been a TV staple since it first debuted on Fox in 1989, but with over 800 episodes under its belt, there are no plans to wrap up the series any time soon. One might imagine that if it ever did end, it could put a neat bow on the lives of Springfield’s beloved animated family, but showrunner Matt Selman says that wouldn’t be the case.

Referencing the season 26 episode “Bart’s Birthday,” Selman told The Wrap that The Simpsons has already parodied the concept of a series finale, so it never needs to actually do one.

“We jammed every possible series finale concept into one show, so that was sort of my way of saying we’re never going to do a series finale,” he explained. “We did a series finale in the middle of the show that made fun of all the ideas of wrapping everything up or ending.”

Selman added that The Simpsons resets every week, like Groundhog Day, and isn’t really meant to change. “If the show ever did end, there’s no finale; it would just be a regular episode that has the family in it. Probably a little Easter egg here and there, but no ‘I’m going to miss this place.’”

Selman also had some thoughts about The Simpsons’ uncanny ability to see the future. The show has previously predicted a range of political and cultural events, from Donald Trump’s presidency to a Siegfried & Roy tiger attack, but Selman says the show doesn’t set out to predict anything.

“We just know that people are silly and make bad decisions, and the people in Springfield are easily misled and are kind of Ding-Dongs. They’re good at heart, just like everybody is kind of good at heart, but they can be misled into making bad choices and manipulated and being short-sighted and selfish and all these things,” Selman said. “That’s a universal thing that doesn’t change over time, so we just study history, we study humanity, we study the past, we study culture, and these things seem to repeat themselves more than you would think.”

A Knight of the Seven Kingdoms Episode 5 Review: In the Name of the Mother

The following contains spoilers for A Knight of the Seven Kingdoms episode 5.

The penultimate episode of A Knight of the Seven Kingdoms first season features what, by all rights, should be its most epic moment. A trial of seven hasn’t been held in Westeros for over a century, and this one features not just a simple hedge knight but also the heir to the Iron Throne, multiple high-ranking members of the Targaryen royal family, a future Lord of Storm’s End, and more. In theory, this is the kind of big, bloody event the Game of Thrones’ universe is famous for, and you’d be forgiven for coming into this installment expecting something akin to a slightly smaller-scale take on the Battle of the Bastards. However, much like almost everything else involved with this show, A Knight of the Seven Kingdoms continues to play with our expectations of what we expect this franchise to be and do.

First, roughly half the episode isn’t even about Ser Dunk’s trial. Instead, it kicks off with a flashback to his youth, as Dunk (Bamber Todd) scavenges a battlefield with his girlfriend Rafe (Chloe Lea) for coin and armor to sell. Daemon Blackfyre is dead, and the latest Targaryen interfamily war is over. But not much has changed either way for the residents of Flea Bottom in King’s Landing, where rats, filth, and death are all around. Presumably, like many others, Dunk and Rafe are plotting to escape, hoarding their coin in the hopes of affording passage to the Free Cities of Essos. But young Dunk is nervous, afraid his long-missing mother won’t be able to find him across the sea, or that life in another place will turn out to be as shit as the one he’s currently living.  

But as so much in these stories often is, it’s all for naught anyway. The death of the Black Dragon means that fares to Essos have doubled, the pair are robbed of their silver, and Rafe is killed. Young Dunk is rescued by a drunken Ser Arlan of Pennytree, who, despite puking everywhere, is actually quite handy with a sword. But this also isn’t the mentorish meet-cute many may have imagined. Ser Arlan is a mess who drinks too much and rants in the woods like a madman, occasionally doing training exercises and generally ignoring the boy who’s trailed after him for miles with no food or shelter. Yet, Dunk suffers on, seemingly determined to become part of his entourage for reasons that feel an awful lot like Stockholm Syndrome. Yes, Ser Arlan saved him and reoriented the trajectory of his life by giving him the motivation to become a knight in the first place, but it doesn’t seem like he did him many kindnesses along the way. (And there’s potentially an argument to be made that he — and perhaps Westeros itself — might have turned out better if he hadn’t.)

We don’t return to the action of the trial of seven until over 20 minutes into the episode, as Dunk regains consciousness on a field that’s so full of mud and fog it’s difficult to track what’s happening. Knights on horseback fly past, maces swing alongside his helmet, and lances shatter overhead. Nothing about this is sexy or feels like the stuff of legend, though it’s a given that this event will almost immediately be reframed as such once it’s over. Dunk and Aerion grunt and wrestle in the dirt, stabbing and scrabbling at each other, dishing out the sort of wounds that make you wonder how either of them is still standing, let alone fighting. And for a moment, Dunk isn’t. But these are the Dunk and Egg novellas, so, spoiler alert, it turns out okay for him in the end.

But while he does get a traditional hero-type moment, dragging himself back to his feet amidst the crowd’s cheers, what’s shocking is how useless it all ultimately feels. Yes, eventually forces Aerion to yield, and the Targaryen ultimately withdraws his accusation over what was, objectively, an incredibly ridiculous charge. But the cost of it all turns out to be well beyond what anyone likely expected. Heck, maybe we should have all guessed immediately that Baelor Targaryen was doomed the moment he stepped forward to do something simply because it was right. That’s how it rolls in this universe, after all, and Baelor joins a long list of good men — Eddard Stark, Oberyn Martell, Robb Stark, Jorah Mormont, to name a few — who were arguably too pure for this world of blood and gore. That he dies is maybe the least shocking thing that’s happened on the show all season, but man, it sure does suck.

Not for the least of which reason being that his death is simply horrible. Bashed in the back of the head by his younger brother’s mace, Baelor essentially dies the minute he takes his helm off, because…it was pretty much the only thing holding his brain in. It’s a horrifying visual — and not to mention downright cruel in terms of its framing, considering the show gleefully leads us to believe everything’s fine mere moments before. For a second, we’re allowed to hope that the only deaths Dunk would have to live with on his conscience are those of Ser Humfrey Beesbury (whom he just met) and Ser Humfrey Hardying (who was already gravely injured anyway). That’s not all that bad, considering! Instead, he’s not only gotten the heir to the Iron Throne killed, but the one Targaryen who didn’t seem like a complete monster. He’s essentially changed Westeros’ history, and most likely not for the better, given the folks involved. 

Though, in Dunk’s defense, it does seem as though Baelor’s death was foretold, meaning that it likely couldn’t have been prevented. In last week’s episode, we learned that his (drunken) nephew Daeron, like House of the Dragon’s Helaena, is gifted with what’s known as dragon dreams. These visions are not usually clear or straightforward, but they’re also never wrong. And, before the tournament, Daeron dreamed of Dunk; specifically, of Dunk and a dead dragon with a massive wingspan that had fallen on top of him but left him alive. In hindsight, it feels obvious what Daeron’s dream meant — Baelor dying in Dunk’s arms — but at the time, with so many Targaryens participating in the trial, no one could have guessed which it most probably referred to. 

Perhaps it’s weird to mourn Baelor so intensely, given how little time we actually spent with him. But it’s hard not to wonder what could have been, what tragedies might have been avoided, had Baelor taken the throne. Plus, there’s the sheer novelty of getting to watch a Targaryen like him, who has been purposefully set against so much of what his family typically stands for. Alas, Prince Baelor, we hardly knew you. Here’s hoping that Dunk can hang on to the world you would have made. 

New episodes of A Knight of the Seven Kingdoms premiere Sundays at 10 p.m. ET on HBO and HBO Max, culminating with the finale on February 22.

Possibly No One Has Ever Been More Injured Than Dunk in AKOTSK Episode 5

The following contains spoilers for A KNIGHT OF THE SEVEN KINGDOMS episode 5.

The first “Trial of Seven” fought on Westerosi soil in over a century was always going to be a bloody affair. But even Aerion Targaryen (Finn Bennett) likely didn’t anticipate the carnage to come when he invoked the ancient Andal custom to get out of a well-deserved ass beating.

We see that carnage play out in A Knight of the Seven Kingdoms episode 5 “In the Name of the Mother” as Aerion’s six champions (Prince Daeron, Prince Maekar, Ser Steffon Fossoway, Ser Willem Wylde, Ser Donnel of Duskendale, and Ser Roland Crakehall) face off against Ser Duncan the Tall and his six supporters (Prince Baelor, Ser Lyonel Baratheon, Ser Raymun Fossoway, Ser Humfrey Beesbury, Ser Humfrey Hardyng, and Ser Robyn Rhysling).

While much of the episode takes place in a flashback to Dunk’s youth when he first met Ser Arlan of Pennytree, he spends almost the entirety of the present day trial as a human pin cushion for Team Aerion’s blades. Whether it’s because Dunk is an unseasoned fighter or merely the largest target on the field, our poor guy just gets lit the hell up out there. In fact, here is a brief rundown of every wound to the hedge knight’s body that we observed:

– Aerion’s lance straight through Dunk’s gut.
– Maekar’s mace to his face. 
– An unidentified morningstar to his face.
– Aerion’s mace to his leg and then to his arm.
– Aerion’s shield crashing down on his neck.
– Aerion’s dagger to his stomach (twice) 
– Aerion’s dagger through his hand. 
– An unidentified mace to his head.
– Aerion’s sword to his back.
– Aerion’s sword to his arm.
– Aerion’s sword to his back. (For the second time in like 10 seconds.)
– Aerion’s sword to his stomach. 
– Aerion’s sword to his thigh.
– End scene.

By the time the final horn blows, Dunk may have sustained more non-fatal injuries than just about any one else in TV history. And his large form looks more like a sentient bruise than a human being. According to Dunk actor Peter Claffey, that physical transformation was every bit as challenging as the fight choreography itself.

“Anna [Knight], my makeup artist, was just insane. I wouldn’t have been able to get through that job without her,” Claffey says. “She had to put that enormous [bruise] prosthetic on my eye every morning. It was like two and a half hours in the chair. She just smashed it every time. We also had a wasp infestation at the time, so there were wasps all over me trying to drink the sugar blood.”

Though Dunk defeats the wretched Aerion Brightflame and survives the ordeal, not all of his teammates are so lucky. After losing both Ser Humfreys in the first charge, it looks as though every one else came out unscathed. Unfortunately, Prince Baelor (Bertie Carvel), Hand of the King and heir to the Iron Throne, suffered a fatal wound to the back of his head that only becomes apparent upon the removal of his helm. The man who helped remove that helm, Raymun Fossoway actor Shaun Thomas, expresses similar appreciation for the makeup department’s gruesome work.

“It was a very difficult scene to shoot because you’ve come from battle, you’re beaten up, and the energy is low. It was hard to embody that and still take the helm off. But it was such a great moment. To actually see the back of his head… it was kind of a natural reaction to what the makeup team had done, which was a great job. And Bertie played it absolutely fabulous. I feel really honored to be a part of that scene.”

Ultimately, the experience of crafting the trial of seven sequences sounds nearly as tiring as the skirmish itself.

“We were so drained. I remember being just so exhausted by trying to feel that pain and portray how much hurt [Dunk] is in,” Claffey says. “You can almost feel yourself going in and out of consciousness because you’re trying to force yourself to feel that every bone is broken and everything is punctured, stabbed, and cut. I couldn’t believe how drained I was by the end of it.”

A Knight of the Seven Kingdoms season 1 finale premieres Sunday, February 22 at 10 p.m. ET on HBO and HBO Max.

Wuthering Heights: The 10 Biggest Book Changes Emerald Fennell Made

Emily Brontë’s Wuthering Heights is not a novel for the faint of heart. Dark and transgressive, especially at the time of its publication in 1847, the story features intentionally cruel protagonists, a toxic central relationship, and an almost shocking amount of physical and psychological violence. It wrestles with themes of class, generational abuse, trauma, and revenge. And while Brontë’s prose drips with all-timers in terms of memorable quotes (“Whatever our souls are made of, his and mine are the same”), it’s not an especially easy read. 

Fittingly, perhaps, director Emerald Fennell’s 2026 feature film adaptation is also not a film for the weak of heart. Bursting with colorful anachronisms, gorgeous butterfly-bright gowns, and sensual audiovisuals, it’s often an adaptation in only the loosest sense of the term, a movie that’s more about vibes than stringent adherence to its source. (That it gets those vibes exactly right is the film’s primary saving grace.) But to bring her vision of putting “the greatest love story ever told” to the screen, Fennell had to make some fairly radical changes to Brontë’s story as we know it. Here are 10 of the biggest. 

Emerald Fennell Cuts Out the Second Half of the Story

In Wuthering Heights, Catherine Earnshaw dies in Chapter 16. However, the book has another 18 to go before we bid adieu to Heathcliff and Thrushcross Grange. Which is to say about half of Brontë’s book takes place after its hypothetical heroine is no longer part of the story. At least directly so. The remainder of the novels follows Heathcliff as he achieves his supervillain final form on a revenge quest that encompasses not just the lives of himself and his established rival/brother-in-law Edgar Linton, but the next generation as well: Cathy’s daughter (also named Catherine), Heathcliff’s son (Linton), and Hareton Earnshaw (the son of Cathy’s brother Hindley, who gets excised from Fennell’s movie entirely). 

In terms of adaptation choices, this isn’t as big a swerve as it sounds. Historically, most cinematic interpretations on Wuthering Heights tend to avoid its darker and more uncomfortable back half, which involves everything from child abuse to enforced marriage. The full breadth of Brontë’s book was even’t truly attempted until Andrea Arnold’s 2011 miniseries version. Still, an exploration of cycles of abuse that sees Heathcliff literally pass his own trauma down to his and Cathy’s children is not exactly peak romance material. Which might be why like other Hollywoodized nips and tucks, including most famously William Wyler’s 1939 iteration starring Laurence Olivier and Merle Oberon, Fennell just decided to skip all that buzz-killing stuff.

Everyone Is a Whole Lot Older Than They Should Be

Both Cathy and Heathcliff are much younger in Brontë’s text than they are in Fennell’s film. She’s just 15 when she accepts Edgar Linton’s proposal and about 19 years old when she dies. In many ways, her youth is an explanation for much of Cathy’s behavior—didn’t we all have an ill-advised bad boy period at her age?—and adds to the tragedy of her death. 

Though the actress herself is 35, Margot Robbie’s Cathy seems meant to be in her mid-to-late 20s. Cathy’s age is hinted at throughout the film, with Nelly calling her “well past spinsterhood” at one point. The film also leans into the Earnshaws’ poverty, repeatedly underscoring the social pressures she faced as her father’s only heir with limited prospects. To Robbie’s credit, her performance absolutely makes Cathy’s childish, obsessive nature central to her character, which often makes her feel as though she’s younger than she actually is. 

Cathy’s Missing Brother (and Heathcliff’s Greatest Enemy)

Perhaps most dramatically at the start of Fennell’s movie is the absence of Hindley, Cathy’s older brother who, admittedly, sucks. He’s Heathcliff’s primary tormenter throughout the story, a cruel bully who makes his life miserable and is extremely jealous of the other boy’s close bond with Mr. Earnshaw. (In the book, Mr. Earnshaw is actually quite kind to Heathcliff, doting on him more than his own children, hence the self-loating sadism of Hindley). Heathcliff’s abusive treatment at Hindley’s hands is a big reason for his growing into the monster he ultimately becomes. Their overt, ongoing hatred of one another is also fairly significant plot point in the latter half of the novel, with Hindley being the ruined drunk that Heathcliff bankrolls into a nearly grave in exchange for Wuthering Heights. Hindley, in turn, fantasizes about murdering Heathcliff and makes several attempts before his death, which leaves his only son left to be raised and denied an education by his worst enemy.

In the film, young Cathy mentions she had a brother who died—in fact, she even claims to have named Heathcliff after him!—but he is otherwise never referred to again. Much of Hindley’s story, particularly the alcoholism, excessive gambling, and his poor treatment of Heathcliff, is transferred to Cathy’s father, but his absence also allows Fennell to soften some of her hero’s rage. Hindley and Mr. Earnshaw’s absence when Isabella arrives to Wuthering Heights, also deletes some of the more Gothic and eerie detours in Brontë’s tale.

Cathy Meets the Lintons as an Adult

Book Cathy and Heathcliff meet their neighbors the Lintons as children. It occurs when Cathy is roughly 12 or 13. Bitten by a dog, Cathy stays at the Lintons to heal. Isabella is Edgar’s pampered sister and roughly Cathy’s same age. 

In Fennell’s take, Cathy sustains a similar injury but she’s a grown woman and falls from a garden wall after attempting to spy on the new residents who’ve just moved into the neighboring estate. (The Lintons are demonstrably, lavishly rich and Isabella is now, curiously, Edgar’s “ward”.) It’s a shift that not only speeds up the marriage plot, which ultimately divides Heathcliff and Cathy, but also makes Edgar a relative stranger when she decides to say yes to his proposal. 

There’s a Whole Lot of Sex

The literary version of Cathy and Heathcliff never explicitly consummate their relationship, and most of the heat between the two is generated through Brontë’s outstanding prose. The pair finally shares a passionate embrace only as Cathy is literally dying. 

Fennell’s film is bursting with sex, from the opening moments in which the sounds of a man hanging could be easily mistaken for the throes of passion. Soon thereafter, Cathy and Heathcliff are banging constantly: on the moors, in a bed, out in the rain, even in a carriage, Bridgerton-style. She cheats on her husband with full awareness of the moral implications of her actions, and Heathcliff even offers to kill Edgar for her at one point. But this Wuthering Heights’ horniness isn’t limited to its central couple. There’s BDSM play, masturbation, and multiple inanimate objects that exist only to be penetrated in some form or other. 

Heathcliff Is A Much Bigger Dirtbag In the Book

Let’s just get it out of the way: The literary Heathcliff is a villain. We can’t really argue about it. He’s a monster, one admittedly shaped by trauma and tragedy, but his choices are ultimately his own. And he repeatedly chooses cruelty and revenge, making much of his life a quest to punish those he believes have wronged him, up to and including his own son. Yes, there are reasons for this: His loss of Cathy, lingering pain from the abuse he suffered at the hands of Hindley, Linton, and even Cathy herself, a lifetime of being told he was lesser, and an awareness that his position prevented him from being with the woman he loved. There are moments of grand tragedy that if one were to, ahem, stop the story at its midpoint would render him a complex Byronic hero. But he’s not, and probably shouldn’t be, anyone’s dream man.

Fennell’s take on Heathcliff is much more in line with the Byronic hero archetype. Her Heathcliff is moody, angsty, frequently shirtless, and fully obsessed with Cathy. (Plus, he’s played by Jacob Elordi, who can literally pick Margot Robbie up by her corset laces.) We’re only given glimpses of his cruelty and pettiness,  primarily through his treatment of Isabella. (And ditching the second half of the novel means Fennell doesn’t have to wrestle with how to present him at his absolute worst.) 

Nelly Becomes the Story’s Villain (Sort of)

Nelly Dean is the narrator of Brontë’s Wuthering Heights, a housekeeper who serves three generations of the Earnshaw and Linton families. Less a character and more a narrative device, she doesn’t have a terribly active role in the story or much agency of her own. 

Fennell turns Nelly into something that comes quite close to the story’s villain, howver: she’s a bastard taken in to serve as a companion and maid to Cathy. She’s resentful and jealous, both of her charge’s close friendship with Heathcliff and her social position. The Earnshaw family finances aren’t great at the time of this story, but they’ve been landowners in Yorkshire for hundreds of years. She has a great deal more agency than her book counterpart, but in Fennell’s adaptation, she’s the deliberate cause of multiple misunderstandings and seems to work to keep Cathy and Heathcliff apart.

She’s aware that Heathcliff’s listening at the door when Cathy says being with him would “degrade her” and doesn’t tell her what happened, even in the face of her charge’s devastation over his disappearance. And she burns all of Heathcliff’s letters to Cathy following his marriage. 

Isabella Is a Willing Participant In Her Own Degradation

Outside of the sex—which is admittedly a big deal—Fennell’s reimaging of Isabella Linton is probably the movie’s biggest swerve from its source material. Edgar’s privileged younger sister is transformed into his socially awkward ward, a complete weirdo who collects ribbons, keeps an elaborate dollhouse, and occasionally outfits her dolls with real human hair. A complete freak from start to finish, she’s openly attracted to Heathcliff, fully okay with it when he explains to her all the ways he’ll treat her terribly and use her to make Cathy jealous, and willingly engages in BDSM play that seems designed to humiliate, complete with a dog collar and chain.

In the book, Isabella marries Heathcliff on the assumption that he might somehow manage to become a real gentleman one day. Brontë is pretty clear that she’s subsequently a victim of domestic violence, with her self-narrated arrival to Wuthering Heights being some of the most outwardly Gothic and horrific passages of the book. Her exit from the story is to eventually flee into the night and move to London where she tries to hide the fact that she gave birth to Heathcliff’s child. She dies young, and Heathcliff defies her reaches by raising the child up as his own back at Wuthering Heights. There is zero puppy play. 

Cathy’s Death

In the book, Cathy gives birth to her and Edgar’s daughter just before she dies, and Heathcliff delivers his whole “Haunt me then!” rant to Nelly (and a tree) outside. Importantly, however, Heathcliff does manage to see Cathy before she does, and the two share their (first!) embrace. 

Elordi’s Heathcliff doesn’t make it to Thrushcross Grange before Cathy shuffles off this mortal coil, which means they technically never speak again after his marriage to Isabella. In both versions, however, Cathy’s death is essentially self-induced. Refusing to eat or leave her bed, she deteriorates rapidly, and it’s implied, causes the miscarriage that ultimately kills her. In the book, however, she lives long enough to warn Heathcliff she’ll never let him forget her and that she wishes she could “hold you till we were both dead.'”

There’s a Distinct Lack of Ghosts 

Lastly, a significant thing that’s lost in Fennell’s decision to emphasize the physical and carnal of hte story is that Wuthering Heights is haunted. Literally. Cathy’s ghost is a recurring character in the book. We, in fact, meet her ghost before we meet Cathy as the story begins when Heathcliff is already an old man, and a new neighbor has the misfortune of looking out her childhood’s bedroom window one night, and to feel her icy hand grab his as she begs to be let back into her home after being cast out in the dark so many years. Her spirit recurs again throughout the novel’s back half as a reminder of the inescapable sins of the past, haunting Heathcliff until he dies from presumably self-induced starvation, just as Cathy did. 

The novel begins as a ghost story and ends in bitter regret. Fennell’s movie begins with the living getting off at the sight of death, and ends with the audience presumably encouraged to do much the same. They’re drastically different takeaways from the same material.

John Munch: The Real and Fictional Lives of TV’s Most Prolific Detective

In the season 2 episode of The Wire “Stray Rounds,” a curious detective arrives at the site of a shooting, accompanying Major Bunny Colvin. A thin man with close-cropped silver hair and dark glasses, the detective surveys the chaos with a bemused expression. In his later appearances in seasons 3 and 4, the detective delivers wry, not always welcome observations about the various cases, sometimes irritating his superiors.

You may think that the description above refers to John Munch, the much beloved Law & Order character played by Richard Belzer. No, The Wire is not one of the many, many Law & Order spinoffs, nor is it any of the many, many other shows in which Belzer has appeared as Munch.

However, your guess would only be partially right. Because that character is Dennis Mello, played by Jay Landsman. But Jay Landsman is a character on The Wire, the surly sergeant portrayed by Delaney Williams. And what does that have to do with John Munch, who does look like Bello, but doesn’t actually appear in The Wire?

Don’t worry, we’ll connect all the pieces, just like the best detectives of Baltimore or New York.

Landsman’s Life on the Street

The first chapter of the 1991 non-fiction book Homicide: A Year on the Killing Streets begins with the description of a detective examining the body of a dead man. Turning the man’s head reveals a hole from which blood oozes out. “There’s your problem,” the detective observes. “He’s got a slow leak.”

According to the narrator, the line is “vintage Landsman, delivered in perfect deadpan
until even the shift commander is laughing hard in the blue strobe of the emergency lights.” Landsman is just one of the detectives featured in Homicide, a book that chronicles the year Baltimore Sun reporter David Simon spent alongside members of his city’s police department. Although Landsman and his compatriots initially balked at the idea of a reporter following them on investigations, they eventually agreed to give him great access, which gave the book enough detail to be a best seller.

Homicide was so much of a hit, in fact, that it caught the attention of writer Paul Attanasio who, with the help of filmmaker and Baltimore native Barry Levinson, turned the book into the NBC procedural, Homicide: Life on the Street. Rather than directly adapt people from Simon’s book, Attanasio created fictional characters based on the real life cops. Thus, Lieutenant Gary D’Addario became Al Giardello, played by Yaphet Kotto. Detective Harry Edgerton became Frank Pembleton, played by Andre Braugher. And Jay Landsman became John Munch, played by comedian turned actor Belzer.

Munch Makes Moves

Homicide lagged in the ratings behind fellow cop shows of the era NYPD Blue and Law & Order. Yet, it garnered enough critical and good will to last seven seasons and a movie. Those fans included Law & Order creator Dick Wolf, who saw an opening for one of the characters when the show ended in March of 1999. When Law & Order: Special Victims Unit premiered a few months later, there was John Munch serving alongside detectives Olivia Benson and Elliot Stabler.

Where Homicide had an arty realism, inspired by the independent cinema movement of the time, SVU is a slick network show. The change gave Belzer room to go broader with Munch, turning his rants about ex-wives and mistrust of the government into likable quirks instead of signs of a potentially unstable personality.

The shift in Munch’s personality made him a fan favorite. Moreover, it allowed him to do more than just jump from Homicide to SVU. While Belzer continued to play Munch in SVU, as well as the main Law & Order series and the spin-off Trial By Jury, he also had one-off appearances in a wide range of shows and movies. Munch shows up in The X-Files episode “Unusual Suspects” and in Arrested Development‘s “Exit Strategy.”

An animated Munch appears in American Dad! while Mike Brady asks Munch for help in A Very Brady Sequel. Belzer plays Munch in fictional episodes of Law & Order for shows such as Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt and 30 Rock. In fact, no other fictional character played by a single actor has appeared in more series than Richard Belzer as John Munch.

Back to Jay

But what about the guy who started it all, Jay Landsman? When he turned his attention to making his own TV shows, Simon brought Landsman along. The 2000 HBO miniseries The Corner, based on the 1997 book The Corner: A Year in the Life of an Inner-City Neighborhood, which Simon co-wrote with former cop Ed Burns, has a brief appearance from the real Landsman.

Simon did not bring Landsman into his next HBO show The Wire—at least not in body. The big, gregarious Delaney Williams doesn’t match Landsman’s frame, but he did have the same sarcastic sense of humor found in the first chapter of the Homicide book, which justified Simon’s decision to name the character Jay Landsman.

Enjoyable as Williams’s take was, he couldn’t replace the real guy. Which is why we get to finally see the actual Jay Landsman on screen throughout The Wire. Sure, he never steals the spotlight from McNulty or Bunk, or even Williams’s outgoing Landsman. But he never misses with his sardonic observations, forever proving that Jay Landsman is the true John Munch.

20 Dark Movies for an Unhappy Valentine’s Day

Moviegoers love love. We love love so much that not only does Hollywood make movies all about love, but studios also put love into movies that don’t require love. So if you’ve got a hot date this Valentine’s weekend, or if you’re just going to spend it on the sofa with someone you adore, you’ll find a multitude of movies to compliment the mood.

But what about everyone else? What about the people who are sick to death of all this crap? Are they forced to swear off cinema this weekend?

Not at all. We’ve compiled a list of 20 films all about the unpleasant parts of romance, movies that will make you happy that you’re so unhappy and alone.

Tillie’s Punctured Romance (1914)

In the early silent era, few studios were as successful as Keystone Pictures. Founded by Mack Sennett, Keystone built its reputation with ludicrous slapstick shorts, launching the film careers of Mabel Normand, Roscoe “Fatty” Arbuckle, and Charlie Chaplin. Keystone’s sole feature-length film captured everything great about the studio and its anarchic vision of the world, turning its eye specifically toward love and romance. Tillie’s Punctured Romance stars Marie Dressler as a lonely woman who gets swept away by promises of love from a swindler (Chaplin), who plans to bilk her of her fortune and run away with his own girlfriend (Normand). Not only does Tille’s Punctured Romance turn a dispeptic eye toward all things lovey-dovey, it punctuates its cynicism with lots of people getting kicked in the rear and an epic pie fight.

Casablanca (1942)

Many a couple have turned on Casablanca for Valentine’s Day only to find very little of the love and affirmation they hoped for. Sure, a flame still burns between Rick (Humphrey Bogart), the nightclub owner who swears he’s an uncaring and amoral mercenary, and Ilsa (Ingrid Bergman), the woman who broke his heart. But the film recognizes that the two cannot be together, even if her presence is enough to spark some sort of passion in him again. As the movie’s famous final lines point out, Casablanca is about the beginning of a beautiful friendship… and about the death of a long-past romance.

Vertigo (1958)

Alfred Hitchcock made great use of Jimmy Stewart’s affable persona in his thrillers, none better than 1958’s Vertigo, precisely because it could be confused as a romance. Stewart plays Scottie, a police detective stricken with the titular malady and hired to investigate a woman named Madeline (Kim Novak). No sooner does Scottie fall for Madeline than she commits suicide. However, he later meets a woman named Judy Barton, who looks just like Madeline (also Novak). As the twisty plot unfolds, Jimmy and Madeline become less doomed lovers and more obsessives who want to control the people around them.

Contempt (1963)

Just the title of Contempt is enough to tell you how director Jean-Luc Godard is going to approach the petite bourgeoisie couple at the center of his film. On a plot level, Contempt deals with playwright Paul Javal’s (Michel Piccoli) attempt to work on a screenplay adapting The Odyssey. However, Godard is more interested in the banal and dying marriage between Paul and his wife Camille (Brigitte Bardot). The rich colors and warm cinemotopgraphy belie the film’s frank depiction of an uncoupling that occurs because neither person has the capacity to care.

Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf? (1966)

Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf? is the loud, angry American cousin to Contempt. Both movies chronicle the end of middle-class marriages, but Virginia Woolf, based on the play by Edward Albee and directed by Mike Nichols, does so with plenty of shouting and grandstanding. The film seems simple enough, capturing a dinner shared between professor and his wife (Richard Burton and Elizabeth Taylor) and a young new professor and his partner (George Segal and Sandy Dennis). However, the party is enough to open up all manner of festering wounds, which leads everyone involved to shout about how much they hate their relationships.

A Woman Under the Influence (1974)

Nobody takes a hard look at relationships like actor-turned-filmmaker John Cassavetes, especially in films that starred his real-life wife Gena Rowlands. That is particularly clear in Cassavettes’s best film, A Woman Under the Influence. The movie lives up to its title, a raw look at a nondescript working-class woman (Rowlands) who has a nervous breakdown. Although her husband (Peter Falk) stands by his wife throughout it all (imperfectly, to be sure), and the film ends on a tender note, A Woman Under the Influence reminds viewers that it being in relationship work can be hard work.

The Stepford Wives (1975)

Based on the novel by Ira Levin, The Stepford Wives a classic conspiracy thriller built around the American dream, as reimagined for the women’s lib generation. Katharine Ross stars as Joanna Eberhart, a free-spirited photographer who moves to the suburbs with her daughters and her apparently supported husband Walter (Peter Masterson). But as Walter becomes friendly with his male neighbors, Joanna begins to feel that he’s comparing her to his friends’ perfect wives. Probably everyone knows the twist of The Stepford Wives, but they may have forgotten that it paints such a dismal portrait of the marital couple.

Possession (1981)

Anyone just reading the synopsis of Possession may be forgiven for thinking it’s a sexy espionage movie in the vein of Mr. and Mrs. Smith. The dour tone that Polish director Andrzej Żuławski brings to Possession quickly disabuses anyone of that expectation, but it’s really the performance of Isabelle Adjani as Ana, wife of spy Mark (Sam Neill) that makes the film wholly unique. Adjani’s performance as a woman who becomes something different after asking her husband for a divorce remains one of the most powerful pieces of acting ever put on screen.

Modern Romance (1981)

The other 1981 pick on this list goes in the exact opposite direction of Possession. Modern Romance stars Albert Brooks, who also directs and co-writes the script with Monica Johnson, as film editor Robert Cole. When Robert lets his worries get the best of him, he breaks up with his long-suffering girlfriend Mary (Kathryn Harrold). Yet, as he goes through date after date, Robert shows the audience (though he doesn’t quite show himself) that he is the problem. Although it’s possible that some could read the end of Modern Romance as a statement about the hard, worthwhile work of a relationship, the prospect of ending up with a guy like Robert is enough to scare anyone into being single forever.

Heartburn (1986)

The name Nora Ephron is synonymous with When Harry Met Sally… and Sleepless in Seattle, as she wrote some of the best romance movies of all time. But her first movie about relationships took a decidedly more cynical approach to the topic. Heartburn, directed by Mike Nichols (this whole list could be made up of his movies), tells a fictionalized account of Ephron’s marriage to Carl Bernstein of All the President’s Men fame, with Meryl Streep and Jack Nicholson standing in as Rachel Samstat and Mark Forman. We won’t spoil the story for you here, but let’s just say that Rachel and Mark don’t end Heartburn on the observation deck of the Empire State Building.

She’s Gotta Have It (1986)

Spike Lee isn’t a name often associated with romance movies, so it may be surprising to some that his debut feature She’s Gotta Have It deals with relationship issues. The film follows Nola Darling (Tracy Camilla Johns) as she deals with three boyfriends (played by Tommy Redmond Hicks, John Canada Terrell, and Lee himself). Within comedic moments of Nola loving and loathing her suitors, She’s Gotta Have It becomes a celebration of non-monogamy and non-commitment—even through its surprising and potentially bleak final moments.

The War of the Roses (1989)

Modern viewers showed little interest in The Roses, the 2025 remake of The War of the Roses starring Olivia Colman and Benedict Cumberbatch. But that shouldn’t diminish the power of the 1989 original. Based on the novel by Warren Adler and directed by Danny DeVito, who also has a supporting role, The War of the Roses chronicles the increasingly ridiculous divorce battle between a rich couple played by Michael Douglas and Kathleen Turner. As mean-spirited as any movie on this list, The War of the Roses doesn’t have much to say about how we get together, but it has a lot to say about the depths to which we sink when we break up.

Wild at Heart (1990)

For as weird and off-putting as he could be, David Lynch was an unfailing optimist, which makes Wild at Heart a potentially strange pick for this list. After all, the movie ends with no less than Glinda the Good Witch from The Wizard of Oz arriving in her bubble to tell Sailor (Nicolas Cage) to go back to his beloved Lula (Laura Dern). Yet, Wild at Heart is also Lynch’s most off-putting movie, and not just because of the bizarre figures who try to break the couple apart. While Lynch himself probably believed in the purity of Lula and Sailor’s devotion to each other, everyone else might be wondering if their romance was worth the destruction left in its wake.

Three Colors: White (1994)

Technically, White is the comedic portion of Polish director Krzysztof Kieślowski’s Three Colors trilogy, coming after the heartbreaking Blue and the more affirming Red. But some may find it hard to laugh at the sad sack protagonist Karol Karol (Zbigniew Zamachowski) and the abuse he suffers at the hands of his French wife Dominique (Julie Delpy). Abandoned in Paris after Dominique demands divorce before they can consummate their relationship, Karol is forced to make his way through a foreign country while trying to win back his love. Even allowing for the fact that Dominique is played by the radiant Delpy, one has to wonder if it’s all worth it.

First Wives Club (1996)

Easily the most upbeat of the entries on this list, First Wives Club is the paradigmatic film about divorce leading to freedom. First Wives Club stars Bette Midler, Goldie Hawn, and Diane Keaton as women who were all left by their husbands for younger women. The trio team up to get revenge, a journey that involves both financial success and, in at least one case, a reconciliation. It’s not exactly realistic, but there is something refreshing about seeing a movie in which the key to happiness is not found in marriage.

Audition (1999)

Oh, to be one of the people who saw Takashi Miike’s Audition before the twist became common knowledge… The first half of Audition, based on the novel by Ryū Murakami, plays like a sweet, if odd, story about a widower searching for love. With the help of a friend in the movie business, the widower Shigeharu (Ryo Ishibashi) holds a series of auditions for a fake movie, where he is immediately enchanted by Asami Yamazaki (Eihi Shiina). Thinking that he’s found the love of his life, Shigeharu pursues Asami, especially after she disappears. Eventually, Shigeharu and Asami reunite and where it goes from there is, well—if you know where it goes, then you know nothing I could write can match it. If you don’t know, don’t let yourself be spoiled. Just go watch Audition now (if you have the stomach for it).

Blue Valentine (2010)

Ryan Gosling has long been a reliable leading man, but he’s always had a weird side. Director Derek Cianfrance, who also worked with Gosling in the crime drama The Place Beyond the Pines, taps into that energy for Blue Valentine, an incredible bummer of a love story. Cianfrance employs a bifurcated narrative structure to contrast the passionate beginning of the marriage between Dean and Cindy Pereira (Gosling and Michelle Williams) and their equally fiery but far less pleasant break-up. The two leads have constant chemistry through it all, making their dissolution all the sadder.

Gone Girl (2014)

Audition may be the ultimate relationship cautionary tale, but Gone Girl is the more famous one. David Fincher‘s icy adaptation of the hit novel by Gillian Flynn (who also pens the screenplay) features a couple at their worst. The film deftly plays with audience allegiances, inviting viewers to believe that Nick Dunne (Ben Affleck) killed his famous wife Amy (Rosamund Pike), and then revealing the true reason that Amy went missing, before finally settling on the fact that both Nick and Amy are terrible people. Gone Girl is a thrilling and unpleasant film, and perhaps be the worst date movie of all time.

It Follows (2014)

Horror movies have long drawn an implicit connection between sex and death, but It Follows made it explicit. So when teen Jay (Maika Monroe) has a dreamy romantic tryst with a new guy called Hugh (Jake Weary), we know that she’s in for a bad time. Maika doesn’t get to bask in the afterglow long, as she’s immediately drugged by Hugh and tied to a chair while he explains the rules to her. By having sex, Hugh has passed onto Jay an invisible entity that will slowly and constantly follow her to destroy her. The only way she can delay her fate is to have sex with someone else, making them the next target. The gauzy direction from David Robert Mitchell and Monroe’s fresh performance transform what could have been an obvious STD allegory into something moving and frighting, but definitely not romantic.

Marriage Story (2019)

Everyone on the internet knows the meme showing Adam Driver punching a wall while arguing with Scarlett Johansson. However, most of them probably don’t know how scary and sad that scene is in its original context, the Noah Baumbach film Marriage Story. Like many films on this list, Marriage Story shows a couple at the start and the end of their relationship, and includes the expected dramatic beats such as the discovery of an affair or sessions with cut-throat lawyers. However, Baumbach keeps the movie grounded in reality, which gives the movie a sense of earned melancholy.

Die My Love (2025)

Many movies of 2025 felt like they were trying to follow in Cassavettes’s footsteps. Movies like If I Had Legs I’d Kick You and Hamnet had big performances of women breaking down, but only Lynne Ramsay’s Die My Love put the protagnist’s marriage at the forefront. Jennifer Lawrence plays an absolutely feral woman who marries an unfaithful dimwit played by Robert Pattinson. That summary promises a broad comedy, but between Lawrence’s ferocious performance and Ramsay’s sensitive filmmaking, Die My Love is a rich movie about how some people should never be in a relationship.

The Muppet Show Special’s Ratings Prove That All We Wanted Was The Muppet Show

Turns out, it is indeed time to play the music, time to light the lights. According to Variety, the one-off special episode of The Muppet Show has drawn 7.58 million across Disney+ and ABC. This broad popular appeal comes alongside almost unanimous critical praise, with the special currently sitting at 98% on Rotten Tomatoes.

Those not paying attention may wonder what cutting-edge gimmick Disney used to garner such attention. Did ChatGPT create new, hip Muppets? Did the Muppets become superheroes? Did a Russian and Canadian Muppet have a steamy but hidden affair that their teammates would never understand?

No, the special was just an episode of The Muppet Show. Which is what we’ve wanted all along.

The Muppet Show originally ran from 1976 to 1981, first on ATV in the UK and then in syndication in the US. The series famously struggled at first. Not only did ABC pass on the first two pilots that Muppet creator Jim Henson and his partner Frank Oz made for a series, but the Muppets proved a poor fit on Saturday Night Live, where they were part of the show’s first season.

However, the show soon found its groove, and fans thrilled to its wacky take on vaudeville variety routines. Even though first season guest hosts included people who would never in a million years appeal to kids—season one featured Broadway folks like Ruth Buzzi and Joel Grey, and past-their-prime sitcom stars Jim Nabors and Florence Henderson—the show still entertained. It survived past its original Gen X audience to become a mainstay of kids’ entertainment.

To be sure, part of that survival is due to spinoffs that put the characters in different scenarios. The Muppet Movie and Muppet Babies work as prequels to The Muppet Show, but The Great Muppet Caper, Muppets Take Manhattan, and The Muppet Christmas Carol have little to nothing to do with the variety show.

However, later attempts to revive the Muppets have seemed almost afraid to return to the basic show format. MuppeTelevision from The Jim Henson Hour, Muppets Tonight, and Muppets Now did away with the vintage format to put Kermit in co. on a hip modern talk show or on a streaming web series, making for an awkward fit each time. The Muppets Mayhem was a narrative series about Dr. Teeth and the Electric Mayhem, which didn’t work, but was still better than the disastrous the muppets, a mockumentary sitcom in the vein of The Office.

The 2026 The Muppet Show is none of these things. Yes, it has Gen Z pop star Sabrina Carpenter as the guest host, and yes, she does sing her hit song “Manchild” (her other number is the decidedly not Gen Z Dolly Parton and Kenny Rogers classic, “Islands in the Stream”). But the structure is all classic Muppet Show: different acts, backstage drama, Statler and Waldorf cracking jokes.

The fact that people of all ages have responded so well to the new special proves that the experiments are no longer needed. We just want The Muppet Show again. So why don’t we get things started?

The Muppet Show is now streaming on Disney+.

Love Is Blind Season 10’s Most Distinctly Ohio Moments

Love is Blind endured a season in which no one made it to “I do,” but it never lacked confidence in its bizarre social experiment. Season 10 marks a milestone for the reality Netflix juggernaut, surviving five years of streaming and somehow finding a place on the list of Netflix’s longest running original series. This season is also personal for one of the series’ hosts, as all the couples bracing the pods are from the great state of Ohio, which is the same state that gave us Nick Lachey (and weirdly half the staff of Den of Geek). 

If you’re thinking: Ohio is an interesting choice, you’re not alone! Ohio has long occupied a strange place in the internet’s imagination. It doesn’t quite have the same gnarly reputation as Florida, but it’s certainly not viewed in a normal way by the people who’ve only flown over it. Since the mid-2010s, the “Only in Ohio” meme surge soundtracked by Lil B’s anthem “Swag Like Ohio” inflated the Buckeye State’s image online. By 2022, TikTok had turned Ohio into a digital fever dream. Creators heavily leaned into the state’s supposed uncanny valley vibe, making absurd, glitch-in-the-simulation images look like an average day in Ohio. 

So when the Midwest singles were announced, one question emerged: would this season humanize Ohio or confirm everything the internet already thinks? Based on the first batch of episodes, the answer might be worse. 

This season feels painfully mid. It’s bloated with way too many engagements, uneven screen time, and much fewer unforgettable pod moments. But buried in these skippable episodes are flashes of moments that felt strange and uniquely Ohio. Maybe these moments won’t go viral in the same way Andrew did with his eye drops in season 3, but they’re strange enough to linger. 

If anything good came from this first batch of episodes, it confirmed that Ohio has not yet been eliminated. Here are the most “Only in Ohio” moments that deserve to be turned into noise edits with cryptic text and zero coherent context. 

Mr. Brightside Connor 

There’s nothing more Ohio than proudly declaring that your favorite song is “Mr. Brightside.” To be fair, it’s not like it’s an out-of-place deep cut, and it’s still far more reasonable than Zach and Bliss’ season 4 pick,I Hope You Dance” by Lee Ann Womack. So when Connor, one of the cast members who makes it out of the pods engaged, announces that The Killers anthem is his “favorite of all time” to Briana, a University of Michigan alumna, it feels like a romantic regional destiny. 

There’s something so charmingly corny about Connor walking out of the pods to that booming melodramatic chorus like he’s emerging from some kind of suburban coliseum and not a Netflix soundstage. It’s not only funny on the surface, it’s also hilarious how earnest this introduction to Connor feels. This is him. Your classic millennial Ohioan who loves The Killers and is passionately anti-Ohio State. Only in Ohio could “Mr. Brightside” function as both a love language and cultural shorthand. 

“Notebook-Esque” First Time 

Not all Ohio men are charming, as evidenced by singles from the Midwest like Amber saying at the couples’ first meetup she normally has “a strong distaste for men.” There’s always a Shake-from-season-2-adjacent menace lurking in the pods, and Steven is no exception. But unlike Shake, he doesn’t leave engaged. 

At first, he seemed harmless enough with Emma. But that facade cracked when she shared the story behind the scars on her arm from a childhood surgery and how bullying left her feeling undesirable for years.

Instead of responding with, say, empathy, he grabbed another White Claw and made it his turn to be vulnerable. Apparently, the most vulnerable thing one could share is a retelling of losing their virginity with the self-awareness of a middle school boy. He called it “Notebook-esque” and pressed Emma about her first time because women’s first times are always also perfect and never awkward or uncomfortable.

Poor Steven was shocked when hers wasn’t cinematic and that she wasn’t pursued in that way until college. Then, to make an uncomfortable situation worse, he called her “a late bloomer” right after she talked about being bullied. The fact that this happened in the first episode set the stage for the tone of the season. Fortunately, the other men had more redeemable conversations, but Steven is not exactly a shining example of Ohio’s dating pool.

Keya Standing on Business 

We’ve seen plenty of women enter reality dating shows claiming to be a “girls’ girl” after the internet reacted to Micah and Irina’s behavior in season 4. People have done lots of unadmirable things on this show, but get called a “mean girl” on TikTok, and your life is basically over.

Keya stood 10 toes down, calling out Kevan for keeping her around until the last minute. She only got clarity from him after his other connection, Tyler L., left. While one can admire Kevan’s honesty, he should’ve known by how calmly Keya reacted to all his indecisiveness that a storm was coming.

What followed was simultaneously the most respectful and the nastiest dismantling of a man on reality TV. The way Keya let down Kevan with such cunning precision and grace deserves to be studied. Because when else has a cast member told a man in his 30s that he was never ready for marriage and needs to get his shit together, only for him to thank her for her time afterward? That’s how well Keya read him. He literally thanked her for destroying his confidence after thinking he had it all figured out.

She also brought up Tyler and asserted that she also deserved better. Normally, when women try to be more ballsy and speak plainly on this show, it’s received poorly, but Keya held her head high, wasn’t overly rude, and still let Kevan down painfully. This has to be an “Only in Ohio” moment because how often do we see a harsh breakup delivered this seamlessly? 

“I Expected a Little More Depth to This”

We finally leave the pods in episode 5 and get a taste of what the cast is like in the real world. As usual, people acted differently when meeting face-to-face, but this time it was so unsettling how guarded everyone was at the first couples meetup that Briana told multiple people she expected “a little more depth” to the gathering. Where is the vulnerability? What happened to the hours of conversations all these people spent getting to know each other? Why is everyone acting like strangers? It’s fair to say, she wanted to cut to the uncomfortable talks with pod exes 

Conversations between pod exes rarely go well. There’s always a few uncomfortable moments of borderline cheating that end up getting played at the reunion. Before she and Connor really spent time getting to know each other, Briana wanted a vulnerable and vaguely flirty conversation with Chris that delivered closure beyond their pod breakup. And her desire for that conversation, even if it was innocent, made Connor very uncomfortable. It’s not looking like their shared love of “Mr. Brightside” is enough to propel Connor and Briana to the altar. 

All Devo Wants To Do Is Read A Book And Watch The Sunrise  

After finding out they’re the only couple that hasn’t consummated their engagement, Brittany W. can’t help but wonder if Devo is holding back emotionally because she hasn’t welcomed sex in their very new union. In turn, Brittany tells him she’s open to taking that next step if it will bring them closer, but Devo remains guarded. God forbid a man wants to sit in silence and not talk about his emotions on the “talk about your emotions” show.

As Brittany builds up the strength to confront Devo, telling him she doesn’t even feel engaged, he explains with the classic Midwestern reasoning that sometimes he just doesn’t want to talk. He’d rather read outside while watching the sun rise instead of staying in bed until Brittany wakes up. She originally didn’t want to rush into a sexual relationship, and that’s fine because outside of the pods, Devo doesn’t want to be intimate with her period, emotionally or physically. Production also did him so dirty zooming in on his feet during this conversation for absolutely no reason. Thank you, Love Is Blind, for creating even more uncomfortable Ohio memes.

Telling Your Fiancée They’re Not Your Type

At the first couples meetup, people didn’t have too many complaints about their respective partners, but if he had to say something negative, Alex H. would tell the guys and Brittany that his fiancée Ashley is not a type he generally goes for. That’s right: Alex, who in all the scenes with just Ashley can’t keep his hands off her, is apparently not into blondes. Could have fooled literally anyone watching. Everyone in the pods likes to say looks don’t matter, but how often does someone add, “It’s not really a problem, but I must tell her she’s not my type”? With their strong physical connection, it feels odd that Alex places such emphasis on his attraction to darker features; a preference he feels so strongly that it’s only right to break the news to Ashley, or else he’s being dishonest. 

He also encourages Brittany to tell Devo, who is already guarded, that he’s not her usual type either. Because everyone knows Love is Blind is all about finding the right person who looks exactly like all of your exes. At least these Ohioans are honest? 

Messy Suitcases 

Mike really doesn’t like that Emma has untidy suitcases. He not only brings it up to the guys as a defining flaw at the first meetup, but also tells Emma later that he hates how unorganized her suitcases are. As long as she got all her stuff from the pods to Mexico, who cares how unorderly she packed them? What an odd thing to get hung up on. It seems like Mike has the same urge that Alex does in looking for red flags for the sake of it. People from Ohio are so ordinary that this cast really has to dig deep to bring the drama. 

Turns out Emma’s actual number one, Connor, welcomes the mess and doesn’t stress about clothes left on the bathroom floor, which coincidentally rubs his fiance Briana the wrong way. Hopefully, these messy star crossed lovers find their way back to each other soon. 

The first six episodes of Love Island season 10 are available to stream on Netflix now. New episodes premiere Wednesdays, culminating with the finale on March 4.

Friday the 13th: How a Real Hockey Team Led to Jason’s Iconic Look

Here’s what we all know about Jason Voorhees: he lives at Camp Crystal Lake, he likes to kill partying teenagers, and he wears a hockey mask. Yet, none of those things were true in the original 1980 Friday the 13th, as the killer in that movie was Pamela Voorhees (Betsy Palmer), who was murdering teens at Camp Crystal Lake after young Jason’s death years earlier. It took a few more movies for Jason to become the character we know and love today.

In particular, Jason doesn’t put on a hockey mask until midway through the third entry, 1983’s Friday the 13th Part III. And the iconic face wear only came into play because someone working on the film happened to be a fan of one of the worst sports teams of the early ’80s, the Detroit Red Wings.

Jason, Masked

When producer Sean S. Cunningham first got the idea for Friday the 13th, he only had a title and a grandiose tagline. “The most terrifying film ever made!” declared the ad that Cunningham put in Variety, despite the fact that not only had said film not been made, but he didn’t even have a script. All Cunningham had was a desire to get a bit of the success that Irwin Yablans and Moustapha Akkad enjoyed with John Carpenter‘s low-budget, holiday-themed slasher Halloween.

That cart-before-the-horse approach has resulted in many unexpected elements of the Friday the 13th franchise, including its ambling approach to building the main character. The hockey mask comes into play in the third movie, not initially because of Jason, but rather because of perhaps the most irritating character in slasher movie history. Larry Zerner plays Shelly, the prankster best friend to hunk Andy (Jeffrey Rogers) and blind date companion to the disappointed Vera (Catherine Parks). Although she clearly isn’t attracted to Shelly, Vera is at least polite when turning down his advances. In response, Shelly either pulls elaborate stunts that annoy everyone or he sulks about the fact that people don’t like it when he does the exact thing they tell him they don’t like.

For his final stunt, Shelly grabs a hockey mask, a diving suit, and a harpoon gun. He scares Vera with it, who once again tells him that she doesn’t like being scared, but also explains calmly that people would want to spend time with him if he actually treated them well. Instead, Shelly goes off to pout, a pity party that thankfully gets cut short when Jason arrives to cut his throat. Even better, Jason takes the harpoon gun and the mask for himself. While the gun doesn’t return after this entry, the mask stays forever.

Jason’s hockey mask has become such an accepted part of horror lore that nobody really questions its origins. When watching Part III with fresh eyes, however, one has to wonder: why wear a hockey mask in the water? The answer involves the Detroit Red Wings.

A Different Type of Dead Thing

In 1926, the National Hockey League was looking to expand further into the United States and sought applications from teams in Detroit and Chicago. In addition to the Chicago Black Hawks (now Blackhawks), the NHL accepted the Detroit Cougars, in honor of the recently-folded Victoria Cougars. The Cougars struggled in its first few years, so badly that they changed the name to the Falcons in 1930 in hopes that the rechristening would inspire the players. When that didn’t work, new owner James E. Norris called the team the Red Wings, and gave them a distinctive logo that honored their Motor City roots. Even better, Norris hired legendary coach Jack Adams, who turned around the team’s fortunes.

In 1936, the Red Wings won their first Stanley Cup, and would win seven more over the next few decades. Their teams would include some of the greatest names in sports, including Ted Lindsay, Alex Delvecchio, and, of course, Gordie Howe. The highlights of those years were enough to make the Wings favorites, even when the team returned to their losing ways.

That was certainly the case in 1980, the year that Jason Vorhees first hit our screens. Starting in 1967, the Wings entered a 20-year slump, a period marked by poor general manager decisions and dissension among the players. Combined with the recession that hit the blue-collar city, Detroit stopped caring about their hockey team. Owners tried to lure fans to the Detroit Olympia and, later, Joe Lewis Arena with new car giveaways, but fans dismissed the product on ice as the Detroit Dead Things.

Yet, as bleak as things were, the team still had its fans. In fact, three of them were working on Friday the 13th Part III, including Martin Sadoff, the man responsible for the film’s 3D effects. According to Crystal Lake Memories, when director Steve Miner noted that the script by Martin Kitrosser and Carol Watson called for Jason to don another mask, Sadoff ran to his vehicle and grabbed the replica Terry Sawchuk mask he had and the rest is movie history.

Winging it With Jason

Well, almost. Miner liked the hockey mask idea, but found the original one fit too small on the head of Jason actor Richard Brooker. Makeup effects director Doug White created a larger mask based on the original, which he decorated by using a drill to make a hole design. But the original Red Wings elements remained in the form of two crimson triangles painted onto the mask.

Over the years, Jason’s hockey mask has been altered and reimagined. It acquired a giant gash from a machete sunk into Jason’s head at the end of The Final Chapter, and Jason X turned it into a metallic faceplate. But fans and filmmakers alike keep coming back to that original mask from 1983.

1983 turned out to be a big year for the Red Wings too. That was the year that then GM Jim Devellano drafted a rookie from British Columbia named Steve Yzerman. In 1986, Yzerman would be named the Wings captain, thanks to his scoring touch. But Yzerman’s real impact came when legendary coach Scotty Bowman joined the team, and instituted a system that required Yzerman to be more of a playmaker than a scorer. Instead of balking, Yzerman took on the new role and captained a team that included Russian superstars Sergei Fedorov and Vladimir Konstantinov.

Under Yzerman’s leadership, the Wings became one of the most dominant teams of the 1990s and 2000s, winning three Stanley Cups during that period. Today, the Wings are (hopefully) coming out of another Detroit Dead Things slump and are on their way to their first playoff appearance in a decade. And who is leading their return to the postseason? Why, it’s their General Manager, Steve Yzerman.

Things haven’t been as good for Jason, as legal squabbles have stalled the franchise at twelve movies. But if the upcoming A24 prequel series Crystal Lake can revive interest in Friday the 13th, then maybe Jason can join his favorite hockey team in a return to prominence.

The Gilded Age Will Have More of Its Best Character in Season 4

Unlike its older English sister Downton Abbey, The Gilded Age casts a more skeptical eye upon its upper-crust protagonists. The central family, led by George and Bertha Russell (Morgan Spector and Carrie Coon) are unapologetic robber barons who find it more challenging than expected to buy their way into the high society of 1880s New York City. Yet, creator Julian Fellowes still has affection for the humanity of his characters and finds space for some delightful people even among the upper crust, none more so than Mrs. Mamie Fish, played by Ashlie Atkinson.

For those who love Mrs. Fish’s gleeful mess-making, season 4 of The Gilded Age will be the best yet. That’s because Atkinson has been bumped up from a recurring cast member to regular, alongside Jordan Donica, who plays Dr. William Kirkland, the love interest to Peggy Scott (Denée Benton). The promotion for Atkinson means that we’re sure to see more of Mrs. Fish giggling at all of the rich person foolishness, much to our delight.

And there is certain to be plenty of rich person foolishness in The Gilded Age‘s fourth season. Season 3 ended with George reaping what he sowed when a clerk shot him, only to be saved by the fast action by Dr. Kirkland. The incident did nothing to diminish his anger at his wife’s manipulations, particularly as they involved son Larry (Harry Richardson) and daughter Gladys (Taissa Farmiga), and he ended the season by telling Bertha that he wants to separate from her. Given the way the social stigma against divorce played throughout the previous episodes, George’s reprimand hits Bertha particularly hard.

Conversely, Kirkland’s ability to save George plays into his proposal of marriage to Peggy, a proposal that came against the wishes of his snobby mother (Phylicia Rashad). At the same time, the season saw the closeted Oscar van Rhijn (Blake Ritson) enter into a sham marriage with the widowed schemer Mrs. Winterton (Kelley Curran).

All these couplings and decouplings make for good soapy watching, and no one enjoys them more than Mrs. Fish—which is accurate to real American history. Marion Graves Anthon Fish lived in New York between 1853 and her death in 1915, a socialite who described herself as a “fun-maker.” The real Mamie Fish hosted grand parties for both new money and old, and, like her television counterpart, spiked her conversations with sharp observations.

As if the big events in the season 3 finale didn’t give Mrs. Fish enough to talk about, season 4 will also see several supporting characters enter the story. Most notable among them are the infamous John D. Rockefeller, portrayed by Neal Huff, and a trouble-making member of the Astor family named Fiona Summers, played by Maggie Kuntz. Television great Dennis Haysbert will also be joining the cast as a mentor to Dr. Kirkland.

Obviously, there will be lots to talk about in The Gilded Age season 4. And if the previous seasons are any indication, there will be lots of horrible behavior among the rich and powerful. But as long as Mrs. Fish is there with her barbed commentary, we can at least laugh as we gasp at them.

The Gilded Age seasons 1 through 3 are streaming on HBO Max.