The Triumph of The Tick, Amazon’s Forgotten Superhero Series

In the premiere episode of the best superhero series on Prime Video, a spaceship falls on a father, crushing him in front of his young son. Out of the ship stumbles the members of the Earth’s greatest superhero team, their eyes bleeding because of weaponized syphilis. Before the heroes can recover, the supervillain arrives to shoot them in the head—well, only two get shot; the youngest simply has his hands crushed. The heroes murdered, the villain mocks the little boy before flying off, leaving him forever traumatized.

Fans of The Boys might be scratching their heads after reading that description. Something so nasty, so filled with ineffective superheroes must come from Prime Video‘s beloved (until recently) adaptation of the comics by Garth Ennis and Darick Robertson. Or maybe it’s from the animated series Invincible, which amps up the violence in Robert Kirkman, Cory Walker, and Ryan Ottley’s celebration of all things comics.

But in fact, it comes from the best superhero series ever produced by Amazon: The Tick. Canceled after two seasons and overshadowed by The Boys and Invincible, The Tick had a weird, resilient optimism (despite the scene described above) that’s needed even more today.

Heroes of the City

The death of the Flag Five at the hands of the Terror was just one of many ways that the Prime Video series differed from most depictions of the Tick. Created in 1986 by Ben Edlund for a newsletter distributed by his local comic book shop New England Comics, the Tick has spawned several comic book series, both in color and black and white, a beloved animated series that ran from 1994 to 1996, a short-lived Fox sitcom in 2001, and, finally, the Amazon series that ran for 20 episodes between 2016 and 2019.

The appeal of the Tick is simple. He’s a giant blue guy with nigh-invulnerability and super-strength who is fully committed to the idea of being a superhero. The Tick has no name, no motivation outside of justice, and no enemies besides evil. And ninjas, but they’re more of an annoyance than enemies. He’s joined by his doughy friend Arthur, a timid accountant in a moth suit that makes him look like a bunny. The Tick defends the City, a metropolis populated by heroes and villains.

Fundamentally, The Tick is about how superheroes are silly. Wonderful and cool and compelling, yes. But most of all, silly. The Tick can sometimes go to dark places, with a whole backstory that reveals the Tick’s past as a lunatic in an insane asylum. And the series loves its occasional satire of DC and Marvel, pairing him with Captain Wonder a.k.a. reporter Clark Oppenheimer or with the Running Guy, who is faster than 10 fast men. But the original comics were more interested in laughing with the weirdness of superheroes than laughing at them, so the Tick and Arthur spent time with less-specific oddballs like Paul the Samurai, Chainsaw Vigilante, and the Man-Eating Cow.

The animated series and sitcom retained the same manic energy, even if it added more direct superhero parodies Die Fledermaus and American Maid (renamed Batmanuel and Captain Liberty for the live-action series). Every incarnation of the Tick has been over-the-top, absurd, and utterly optimistic… except for the 2016 series, at least at first.

Big Blue Destiny

On the surface, 2016’s The Tick has everything you’d expect from an adaption of the comics. There’s Peter Serafinowicz as the titular guileless and energetic big blue hero. Griffin Newman plays Arthur as a nervous accountant in a grey moth suit that makes him look like a bunny. They live in an unnamed city, under threat by the villainous Terror (Jackie Earle Haley), and cross paths with other heroes like Overkill (Scott Speiser) and the Superman-styled Superian (Brendan Hines). Arthur’s sister Dot (Valorie Curry, perhaps best known today as Firecracker on The Boys) even appears.

But it takes only a few minutes for the series to establish itself as something very different from what came before, something realistic. We meet Arthur as a depressed young man trying to cover up his mental illness, a steadfast belief that the Terror, who killed his father and members of the Avengers-esque Flag Five 15 years ago, still lives, despite the promise that he’s been long since defeated by Superian. When Arthur gives in to his worst instincts and follows the villain Miss Lint (Yara Martinez) and a group of thugs to a warehouse, he’s intercepted by the Tick, an endless figure of excitement and glee in an otherwise dark world.

In the pilot and the first few episodes, The Tick toys with the idea that Tick is just the manifestation of Arthur’s intrusive thoughts. Yes, Arthur lives in a world with Superian and the Terror, but he’s just a broken man, and the Tick is his psychosis.

Unlikely as the premise is for The Tick, it made sense in 2016. The pilot was directed by Wally Pfister, Christopher Nolan‘s cinematographer, who shot all three entries in the Dark Knight trilogy. The first episodes feel like they’re trying to take the Tick in a similar direction, offering a more believable way to tell a story about a giant blue superhero who says things like, “Crime, nastiness and evil rear their fowl odorous heads in every corner of the globe, and that’s saying something because globes don’t even have corners!”

Pretty quickly, the show did away with that conceit and allowed the Tick to live in the world. However, it never abandoned the mental health aspect. In fact, it expanded to show how not just Arthur, but everyone—Dot, Overkill, even Superian—had some failure haunting them, some sadness they couldn’t shake. Thus the heroism of the Tick is less about his powers and more about his indefatigable commitment to doing good. He’s completely unbothered by disappointment or confusion. For example, when Arthur’s stepdad (Francois Chau) greets the hero by exclaiming, “Look at you,” Tick gleefully doesn’t stop to suss out the meaning. He just responds “Impossible!” and carries on.

The Tick’s embrace of all his weirdness became less a coping mechanism for living in an awful world, and more of a model for making the awful world better.

Going Sane in a Crazy World

Despite its gritty premiere, the final episode of The Tick features a host of superhero tropes. Supervillain the Duke (John Hodgman) has infiltrated the S.H.I.E.L.D. pastiche A.E.G.I.S., undermined the new Flag Five, and sent agents to kill Arthur’s family, all while Superian has an existential crisis on the Moon. Instead of leaping into action, however, Arthur and Dot get overwhelmed by past failures and mistakes, the same feelings of inadequacy that stall Overkill and Miss Lint’s turns toward heroism.

As always, Tick responds to the crisis with a monologue, full of hyperbole and mixed metaphors. But this time, there’s something truly inspirational in his garbled words. “The truth about the truth is that it’s a choice,” he declares. “Choose love or choose fear. Everything else is up to destiny.”

It’s a silly statement, to be sure, and the show recognizes the self-help cliches in Tick’s speech, just as it does the purple prose he usually spouts. But in that moment of self-doubt and despair, anything positive seems silly. Moreover, the fact that Tick says it with such sincerity, without even the hint of apologizing for who he is, becomes inspirational. As he’s done from the first episode, Tick invites Arthur to be who he is: not a broken man who copes with his trauma by dressing up like a moth/bunny, but a human who has both experienced hurt and makes weird, wonderful choices.

The finale of The Tick plays even better now, in the shadow of the finale of The Boys. The Boys underscored its central point about the inherently empty and pathetic pursuit of power (whether in the real or fictional White House), but it couldn’t make the switch from outrageous edgy humor to genuine human emotion, no matter how much Homelander offered to degrade himself.

By the end of its run, The Tick also turned its superhero tropes into something relevant, by reminding the viewers that there’s no such thing as normal, no such thing as a broken person, just a bunch of freaks who will make the world a better place when they they let Destiny get all up in their puppets.

The Tick is streaming in its entirety on Prime Video.

A Moriarty Series Could Change the Sherlock Franchise Forever 

The nemesis of Oxford Yard’s resident detective is getting his own series. James Moriarty will receive his own modern retelling at the behest of Fremantle, producers of Poor Things, and Archery Productions, who produced Operation Mincemeat. The series is set to be written by Chris Cornwell, known for the show A Discovery of Witches, and Oliver Lansley, Where’s Wanda?

According to Deadline, this iteration of Moriarty will be a professor at Durham University, leading a double life as a mastermind behind the series of intricate criminal activities plaguing Northern England. Moriarty joins the police as a consultant to take down a rival criminal mastermind who is threatening his criminal enterprise. Sherlock Holmes’ arch villain must keep his true identity hidden while partnered with Yorkshire detective Imogen Burrows and discover a real threat that isn’t his fellow law-breaking rival. 

So far, that is all that is known about this upcoming series. Despite numerous Sherlock adaptations in recent history, including Prime Video’s Young Sherlock earlier this year, which stars Dónal Finn as the young, edgy James Moriarty, this new project represents the first time that a story focusing on Moriarty’s perspective has been adapted into a live-action TV series or film. The only other time in recent history that the criminal mastermind’s perspective has been told on screen was in the 2020 anime Moriarty the Patriot

Moriarty the Patriot provided an in-depth look into the motivations and backstory of the iconic villain, giving the professor’s criminal behaviors and cold-hearted approaches fresh perspectives. That project made him less of an enigmatic figure, and more of a killer radical who believes that violence is necessary to stop crime.

The character of Professor Moriarty was first introduced in Sir Arthur Conan Doyle’s 1893 short story The Adventure of the Final Problem. Nicknamed “the Napoleon of Crime” by Sherlock, Moriarty is based on the real life international thief and German-American crime boss of the same moniker, Adam Worth. 

Worth famously stole Thomas Gainsborough’s portrait of Georgiana, the duchess of Devonshire, from the London gallery Agnew and Sons in 1876. An alluring young woman, the duchess is the ancestor of another alluring and impactful figure of the British aristocracy, the people’s princess, Princess Diana. 

Moriarty has seen many faces over the years in the numerous adaptations of Sherlock Holmes. Andrew Scott played the professor in BBC’s Sherlock (2010-2017) which earned him a BAFTA award for Best Supporting Actor. Jared Harris played Moriarity in 2014’s Sherlock Holmes: A Game of Shadows opposite Robert Downey Jr.’s Sherlock. 

Alongside the traditional takes on the character, there have been a few female adaptations as Natalie Dormer played Jamie Moriarty in Elementary alongside Lucy Liu as Dr. Joan Watson. Sharon Duncan-Brewster played Mira Troy a.k.a. Moriarty, in Enola Holmes 2

The character of Moriarty has been both a traditional character and a mantle to be passed to a successor. Who will play the captivating thieving mastermind in the new series? It appears, for the showrunners, a new game is at foot.

007 First Light Is Already Dividing Gamers… And That’s OK 

IO Interactive has rewound time to give fans the origins of the most iconic figure in espionage, James Bond. The Hitman studio’s new game 007 First Light depicts a young, reckless, and developing Bond during his time in the MI6’s training program as the former naval air crewman trains to confront a global conspiracy. The game explores how the spy became who he is, developed a moral code, and became the magnetic figure known as Agent 007. 

The game stars Irish actor Patrick Gibson (who previously played young serial killer Dexter Morgan in the Showtime series Dexter: Original Sin) as James Bond and has received overwhelming acclaim from critics but mixed reviews from players. While online commentary from gaming fans and influencers has run the usual hyperbolic gambit between “horrible” and “top contender for Game of the Year,” the game has also raised questions about time and money that are worth exploring.

With an estimated standard runtime of 15-20 hours, 007 First Light adopts a heavy focus on showing Bond’s development as a spy, meaning the training sequence runs well over an hour before the player goes on their first mission. The game is segmented into 17 chapters, a mix of cutscene-focused chapters that focus on story development and gameplay-focused chapters, which include the heavier infiltration missions. 

With each chapter lasting an hour or more, the game packs in a lot of character development, and gameplay can run up to well over 30 hours. Despite this, the standard runtime has some players opining that the game isn’t long enough. 007 First Light costs $69.99 for its standard edition and $79.99 for its deluxe edition and some fans believe that an average of 15 hours of gameplay isn’t worth the price. 

“While I enjoyed the story, visuals, and the gameplay combo of Hitman + Watchdogs feels good, I cannot really recommend anyone pay 70 euros for 15 hours of campaign,” player Dani commented on Steam.  

However, others say it is due to user error, with many who have beaten the 15-hour mark within the first quarter of the game. 

“I’m on Chapter 5, and I just hit the 18-hour mark,” Reddit user AiserComplex posted. “Maybe don’t try to speedrun the game on your first playthrough, and you might get more out of it.”

The question of value in gaming is not one that’s unique to 007 First Light. While the issue of gameplay time is a mixed bag, the increasing prices of AAA games with decreasing runtimes are an increasing complaint. AAA game developers are beginning to lose their grip on the industry’s wants, leading to an increase in complaints ranging from cost, production, and a lack of understanding of the source material. 

There has been some additional griping that the identity of James Bond is not fully encapsulated by the game. However, that seems to be due to the era of Bond’s life in the game, with the agent not yet being the fully actualized Bond that fans know from the movies. He is coming directly from being a soldier in active combat to now learning the intricacies of spydom. The transition adds to Bond’s learning the difference between a master manipulator and a calculated killer. 

Gameplay has also received some criticism, particularly its gun fights, for being underwhelming, quickly running out of ammo, and clumsy shooting mechanics

All of these critiques (even from reviewers and fans who are otherwise positive about the title) seemingly represent the newest reality of AAA games, as studios assume that quality will make up for a lack of quantity, or vice versa. For some fans, it just doesn’t, and that is OK. 

Despite the criticism, 91.78% of the reviews are positive on Steam, with criticism mixed into many of the positive reviews; the majority like the game. The appreciation of the story-driven game for a character like Bond is a trend in reviews. 

This is ultimately good news for the spy game genre, which has sorely lacked solid narratives since the release of IO Interactive’s Hitman 3. The gaming community’s occasional frustration might be the adjustment to a more story-forward experience. 

Narratively compelling games have been on a comeback for a few years, but it seems that the early 2000s-2010s style that was prevalent in the Uncharted series, Assassin’s Creed 2, Star Wars: The Force Unleashed, and the Arkham Knight series is making a comeback. 

Now, 007 First Light may not be on the same caliber as all of those games, but it is a step in the right direction to finding the balance of storytelling and gameplay that fans have been missing. 

007 First Light is now available to play on PC, PlayStation 5, Xbox Series X|S, and Nintendo Switch 2. 

X-Men ’97 Producers Tease the Return of a Fallen Fan Favorite

This article contains potential spoilers for X-Men ’97 season 2.

The first trailer for X-Men ’97 season 2 was full of treats for fans. But for fans of the Ragin’ Cajun Gambit, the trailer was nothing but sadness. We get to see a little of Rogue mourning her beloved, but nothing indicating that he’ll do what the X-Men do best: come back to life.

X-Men ’97 writers and producers Eric and Julia Lewald aren’t ready to say that Gambit will return. But they are willing to offer some hope that Remy LeBeau will be back. Season 1 ended with a post-credit scene that saw Apocalypse holding one of Gambit’s playing cards and musing about “So much death,” perhaps a gesture to a comic book storyline that involved Remy.

“We probably don’t wanna get too close to answering that specifically, but appreciate that a lot of folks are picking up breadcrumbs,” Julia told Entertainment Weekly about the scene, playing it coy. But Eric went further, adding, “If you were a betting man, I would say, follow the breadcrumbs.”

Where do those breadcrumbs lead? Well, to death. Or, more specifically, Death. In the 2006 storyline Blood of Apocalypse, Gambit seeks out the immortal supervillain shortly after the events of M-Day, when the Scarlet Witch de-powered nearly all of the world’s mutants. In X-Men #182–187, written by Peter Milligan and illustrated by Salvador Larroca, Gambit believes that Apocalypse could revive the mutant population, and so he agrees to become the Horseman Death, with one caveat: that Apocalypse leave his mind intact.

Gambit makes that demand because he’s well-acquainted with Apocalypse’s MO. From his earliest appearances in the pages of X-Factor, Apocalypse has always sent four Horsemen to do his bidding: Death, Famine, War, and Pestilence.

Apocalypse always forms his Horsemen from existing people, and often heroes. Archangel came to be when Apocalypse took the X-Men founding member Angel and transformed him into the Angel of Death (mixing biblical metaphors, but we’ll allow it). Over the years, other X-Men have become his Horsemen, including Wolverine, Storm, and even Professor X.

But Gambit wasn’t careful enough as Apocalypse controlled his mind anyway, a process that took an unpleasant alliance with Mister Sinister to reverse.

Whatever the value of Gambit’s intentions in the comics, they won’t matter in X-Men ’97, because he no longer has any intentions at all. Gambit valiantly sacrificed himself to destroy the Omega Sentinel that attacked the mutant island of Genosha in the first season of the revival series, stopping an already monumental death count from getting even higher.

As we saw in the trailer, season 2 of X-Men ’97 will focus on Apocalypse, with a team in Ancient Egypt dealing with his younger, non-villainous identity En Sabah Nur, and another in the future where he has conquered the planet. With the X-Men fighting him across so many timelines, Apocalypse will have to get help wherever he can. And if that’s the only way that we get Gambit back on our screens, well, fans will gladly follow those breadcrumbs.

X-Men ’97 season 2 premieres on Disney+ on July 1, 2026.

Daredevil: Born Again Can Finally Give Us the Cage and Iron Fist Team-Up We Want

This article contains light spoilers for Daredevil: Born Again season 3 based on set photos.

Daredevil: Born Again hasn’t just been about the rebirth of Matt Murdock, the blind lawyer who spends his evening defending the streets of Hell’s Kitchen as Daredevil. It’s also been about the rebirth of the Netflix Marvel series that first introduced Charlie Cox as Daredevil and Vincent D’Onofrio as Wilson Fisk. Season 2 brought back Krysten Ritter as Jessica Jones and, in the final minutes, Mike Colter as Luke Cage. Set leak photos have already confirmed that the fourth member of the Defenders would also be coming to Born Again, Finn Jones as Danny Rand a.k.a. Iron Fist.

However, the latest group of set leaks suggest that Danny and Luke will be more than old acquaintances. The images show Danny and Luke taking a walk with that latter’s daughter with Jessica, Dannielle Cage (or, to use her telling nickname, “Dani”). Seeing the two together in a quiet, personal moment raises hopes that season three of Born Again will finally give comic fans the pairing they’ve wanted.

Luke Cage and Iron Fist were not initially paired together. Luke debuted in 1972’s Luke Cage, Hero for Hire #1, written by Archie Goodwin and penciled by George Tuska, while Danny arrived two years later, in Marvel Premiere #15, written by Roy Thomas and penciled by Gil Kane. Like the vampire hunter Blade and the motorcycle-riding Ghost Rider, Cage and Iron Fist were introduced as part of Marvel’s attempts to incorporate pop culture trends into their superhero line, namely Blaxploitation and kung fu movies.

Separately, the two garnered a strong readership at first, but when sales flagged, they were put together. In 1978, Luke’s book was renamed Power Man and Iron Fist. Since then, Luke’s superhero moniker “Power Man” has come and gone, but the friendship between the two has been consistent. Even when one or the other has their own solo series or, Luke and Danny come back together again. Time and again, we see that the two work best when Luke’s down-to-earth, streetwise approach tempers Danny’s mystical powers. In recent years, writers have changed the dynamic to make Luke the more centered of the two, a strong contrast to the more goofy (and sometimes out of touch) Danny.

That last characterization did make its way into live action, but not in Luke Cage, nor in Iron Fist. Instead, the two only shared the screen in Defenders—where they had to make room for everyone else. Leaving aside the fact that Defenders fell far short of its potential to be the Avengers of the Netflix heroes, the series was naturally overstuffed. In addition to the four central heroes, the show also featured Elektra and Stick from Daredevil, as well as Sigourney Weaver as the big bad. Danny and Luke did get to trade some quips, but only in the margins of the bigger story.

Obviously, Daredevil: Born Again won’t be a Power Man and Iron Fist show. The two will be on the margins of a story that still focuses on Matt Murdock and Wilson Fisk. But the fact that we see Danny with Luke and Danielle shows that the series understands that the two have a strong bond, something that could be explored in a later Disney+ entry.

Now if they’d just get Misty Knight and Colleen Wing into a Daughters of the Dragon series…

Daredevil: Born Again seasons one and two are now streaming on Disney+.

15 Board Games That Won’t Be a Bored Game

The dreaded board game night doesn’t need to stay that way, since there are multiple games that, contrary to popular belief, aren’t an absolute bore. Teg and Chess are all well and good, but there are many newer games you can get your hands on, with both complex and simple rules to follow.

Not every game here is for everyone, although at least one of these games will become your next favorite thing. If you need some time away from your screens, these are just a few board games you and your friends can enjoy.

Stonemaier Games

Wingspan

Wingspan turns birdwatching into a surprisingly addictive strategy game built around engine-building and gorgeous artwork. Its relaxing pace and satisfying combos make it approachable for newcomers while still giving experienced players plenty to optimize.

Czech Games Edition

Codenames

This team-based word game became a modern party staple thanks to its simple rules and clever social deduction gameplay. One-word clues can create hilarious misunderstandings, making every round feel tense, competitive, and unexpectedly funny.

Avalon Hill

Betrayal at House on the Hill

Players explore a haunted mansion together until one secretly turns against the group. The constantly shifting scenarios and horror-inspired twists make every session feel different, especially once the inevitable betrayal changes the entire game.

Leder Games

Root

Root combines adorable woodland animals with surprisingly deep asymmetric strategy. Every faction follows different rules and objectives, creating a competitive game where players constantly adapt to wildly different playstyles and shifting alliances.

Plan B Games

Azul

At first glance, Azul looks calm and elegant, but it quickly becomes fiercely competitive. The tile-drafting system rewards careful planning while punishing mistakes, creating a visually beautiful strategy game that remains easy to learn.

Cephalofair Games

Gloomhaven

Part board game and part tactical RPG campaign, Gloomhaven offers deep cooperative combat and long-term progression. Its card-based mechanics reward teamwork and planning far more than luck, making it especially appealing to strategy-heavy gaming groups.

Days of Wonder

Ticket to Ride

This railway-themed classic stays popular because it balances accessibility with just enough strategy. Building train routes across maps feels satisfying, while blocking opponents at the perfect moment can turn an otherwise friendly session unexpectedly ruthless.

Repos Production

7 Wonders

Designed around simultaneous turns and card drafting, 7 Wonders keeps large groups engaged without endless waiting. Building civilizations through science, trade, and military power gives the game surprising depth despite relatively straightforward mechanics.

Exploding Kittens Inc.

Exploding Kittens

Built around absurd humor and quick rounds, Exploding Kittens thrives on sabotage, luck, and chaotic reversals. Its simple gameplay makes it ideal for casual gatherings where people want something fast, loud, and easy to understand.

FryxGames

Terraforming Mars

Players compete to make Mars habitable through massive projects involving oceans, cities, and atmosphere control. The game blends resource management and long-term planning into a dense but rewarding strategy experience that science fiction fans especially love.

Libellud

Mysterium

In Mysterium, one player acts as a ghost giving surreal visual clues while others solve a murder mystery. Its cooperative gameplay and dreamlike art style create a slower, more atmospheric alternative to louder party games.

Days of Wonder

Heat: Pedal to the Metal

This modern racing game keeps players constantly managing speed, corners, and risk. Unlike many racing board games that feel slow or random, Heat creates real tension by rewarding aggressive decisions and smart momentum control.

Greater Than Games

Spirit Island

Instead of colonizing islands like many classic strategy games, players defend one from invading settlers. Its cooperative mechanics, escalating difficulty, and highly distinct spirit powers make it one of the most respected modern strategy board games.

Ravensburger

Disney Villainous

Disney Villainous lets players control iconic Disney villains like Maleficent, Ursula, and Jafar, each with unique objectives and mechanics. Its asymmetrical gameplay and strong theme make it especially fun for fans who enjoy strategy mixed with nostalgia.

Unstable Games

Unstable Unicorns

What starts as a cute card game quickly becomes chaotic sabotage warfare involving betrayals, destructive combos, and ridiculous magical effects. Its humor and unpredictability make it especially popular for casual game nights with competitive friends.

15 Shows That Feel Embarrassing to Watch With Other People in the Room

We love shows that push limits, particularly on how to tell stories, not to mention what’s ok to tell. Adult content should, after all, be mature rather than forbidden. We ask creators to give us originality, but how do we behave once that creativity arrives at our TV screens?

Embarrassment is usually the first reaction, particularly when we weren’t expecting it. These following shows aren’t necessarily bad by any means, but they make regular households uncomfortable. Be sure to check if you’re alone before tuning into them, unless you’re prepared to answer exactly what you’re watching.

IMDb

Euphoria

What starts as a teen drama quickly turns into explicit content, heavy drug use, and emotionally raw meltdowns. Watching Euphoria with parents, roommates, or coworkers nearby can turn even a quiet living room into deeply awkward silence.

IMDb

Sex Education

Despite its humor and heart, Sex Education lives up to its title. Constant intimate conversations, awkward therapy scenes, and blunt intimacy can make this one feel like the exact wrong pick when someone unexpectedly walks in.

IMDb

Game of Thrones

Political intrigue may be the draw, but Game of Thrones built a reputation for graphic scenes, intimate encounters, and brutal violence. It is the kind of show that instantly makes people pretend to check their phones.

IMDb

Bridgerton

Its elegant costumes and period-drama vibe make Bridgerton seem harmless. Then the show pivots into frequent, explicit romance scenes, creating one of the most notorious “why did I start this with family?” streaming experiences.

IMDb

The White Lotus

A sharp satire about wealth and privilege, The White Lotus also thrives on uncomfortable intimacy, and deeply awkward interpersonal moments. It can be brilliant, but definitely not ideal when other people are casually glancing at your screen.

IMDb

Big Mouth

Because it is animated, Big Mouth can seem deceptively harmless. Then it dives headfirst into puberty, graphic humor, and wildly explicit jokes that make it nearly impossible to defend while someone watches over your shoulder.

IMDb

Outlander

Historical drama fans may come for the romance and time-travel hook, but Outlander includes explicit intimacy and disturbing violence. It often jumps from heartfelt storytelling to scenes that are very uncomfortable in shared spaces.

IMDb

You

You blends stalking, obsession, murder, and romantic intimacy in a way that already feels unsettling. Add sudden intimate scenes and dark psychological tension, and it becomes a very strange communal viewing choice.

IMDb

Orange Is the New Black

Its humor and ensemble cast made it hugely popular, but Orange Is the New Black frequently mixes prison drama with explicit content, and blunt conversations that can make family viewing unexpectedly uncomfortable.

IMDb

Fleabag

Phoebe Waller-Bridge’s comedy is brilliant, but Fleabag weaponizes awkwardness. Its fourth-wall breaks, sharp honesty, and uncomfortable intimacy can leave viewers laughing while also hoping nobody asks what exactly they are watching.

IMDb

True Blood

What sounds like a supernatural vampire drama becomes a mix of gore, exposure, and wildly chaotic adult content. True Blood has enough sudden intensity that it can feel embarrassing with even close friends nearby.

IMDb

Girls

Girls intentionally leaned into awkward realism, including blunt intimate scenes, uncomfortable vulnerability, and painful conversations. That honesty made it acclaimed, but also the kind of show people may rather watch alone.

IMDb

Shameless

Whether U.S. or U.K., Shameless thrives on crude humor, chaotic family dysfunction, and public embarrassment. That unpredictability makes it entertaining, but not exactly ideal when relatives are watching nearby.

IMDb

Californication

David Duchovny’s dramedy is built around intimacy, self-destruction, and blunt adult humor. Even if the writing clicks, Californication can be hard to casually justify when someone walks in at the wrong moment.

IMDb

Spartacus

Known for stylized violence and graphic content, Spartacus pushed premium TV excess hard. Between brutal fights and explicit scenes, it is one of those shows that instantly becomes awkward when anyone enters the room.

10 D&D-Style Games for Modern Geeks to Enjoy

Dungeons & Dragons is the undisputed king when it comes to TTRPGs, there’s no denying that. There is also nothing wrong with it either, since it can be a lot of fun to play. The 5.5 version of the rules have made the game both approachable and tactical, with each combat encounter and dungeon crawl telling its own story.

After many years of playing the game, however, a change is needed. You could be looking for a new system for your next campaign, or just for a couple of one-shots to shake things up. No matter your reasoning, if you want something new, these are the TTRPGs that you have to try at least once.

MCDM

Draw Steel

Created by MCDM, Draw Steel focuses heavily on tactical teamwork and cinematic combat without dragging sessions down with excessive complexity. It aims to streamline many frustrations players have with modern D&D while still keeping heroic fantasy, strong class identity, and highly customizable combat roles at the center of play. Many of its features are similar to the dreaded 4th edition of D&D, but there was a lot to love from it even then.

Darrington Press

Daggerheart

Critical Role’s Daggerheart leans much harder into collaborative storytelling and emotional character moments than traditional D&D. Its duality dice system encourages narrative swings and improvisation, making it feel more focused on roleplay momentum and party relationships than strict tactical optimization or rigid combat balance. However, it isn’t really recommended for groups larger than four.

Need Games

Fabula Ultima

Inspired by classic JRPGs, Fabula Ultima emphasizes dramatic storytelling, emotional arcs, and flexible multiclassing over dungeon crawling realism. Players are encouraged to shape the world alongside the game master, giving them a clear role in the story beyond their characters. It’s so freeform that it might be off-putting for D&D purists, but it’s definitely worth a try.

The Chinese Room

Vampire: The Masquerade

Rather than focusing on treasure hunts and monster fights, Vampire: The Masquerade revolves around politics, morality, and personal horror. The system rewards social manipulation, secrecy, and internal conflict, creating campaigns where emotional tension matters far more than combat statistics or dungeon exploration. It’s also the ideal system to play as the bad guys.

Cyanide

Werewolf: The Apocalypse

Werewolf: The Apocalypse mixes supernatural horror with environmental and spiritual themes rarely explored in D&D. Its rage-driven mechanics create volatile characters constantly balancing fury and responsibility, while the setting pushes players toward tragic conflicts instead of simple heroic fantasy victories.

Paizo

Pathfinder

Often seen as D&D’s biggest direct competitor, Pathfinder offers far deeper character customization and tactical combat depth. Players who enjoy complex builds, detailed rules interactions, and meaningful combat choices often prefer it over the more streamlined direction modern D&D has taken. Most people prefer less rules when looking for a D&D alternative, but if you want more rules, this is your pick.

Melsonian Arts Council

Troika!

Troika! abandons grounded fantasy logic entirely in favor of bizarre, surreal adventures filled with strange backgrounds, weird dimensions, and unpredictable encounters. Its loose structure encourages chaotic creativity, making it feel more like a psychedelic science-fantasy fever dream than a conventional dungeon crawler. It can be ideal for players and game masters that want strange lore but can’t come up with it.

Asmodee

Legend of the Five Rings

Set in the samurai-inspired world of Rokugan, Legend of the Five Rings places huge emphasis on honor, status, and social conflict. Characters are often punished more for embarrassment or political failure than physical defeat, creating a very different roleplaying experience from D&D. In a way, it’s like if every player was the Paladin, bound to a given set of rules or oaths.

Cyanide Studio

Call of Cthulhu

Unlike D&D heroes who steadily grow stronger, investigators in Call of Cthulhu are fragile people facing unknowable cosmic horror. Survival is never guaranteed, and sanity itself becomes a resource players constantly risk losing while uncovering terrifying truths. If you’d rather fight the mythos rather than be their victim, the Cthulhu by Torchlight book for D&D is what you’re really looking for.

Paizo

Dungeon Crawl Classics

Dungeon Crawl Classics intentionally embraces old-school unpredictability and deadly chaos. Low-level characters die constantly, magic can catastrophically backfire, and adventures feel dangerous in ways modern D&D often avoids, making victories feel earned rather than expected. If this sounds like a chore, it isn’t, since the system is built around constant death and quick character creation.

15 Popular Shows We’ve Never Heard Anyone Mention

When a show runs for several seasons, we can consider quite a few of them a success. After all, no show gets renewed out of pity; it needs to be making money to justify the spot. And yet, throughout television’s history, there are shows that aren’t even remembered today but were hugely popular before.

If a show gets cancelled after one season, it is expected that it won’t penetrate the general culture discourse. But after five seasons? Eight, in some cases? That’s nearly a decade of content people consume and don’t even remember. These are the shows that are strangely forgotten today.

IMDb

Blue Bloods

For years, Blue Bloods pulled strong CBS ratings and lasted well over a decade, yet it rarely dominated online fandom spaces compared to flashier dramas. Despite its popularity, it often felt absent from broader internet conversations.

IMDb

NCIS: Los Angeles

As part of a hugely successful franchise, NCIS: Los Angeles consistently drew solid network audiences. Still, outside loyal viewers, it generated far less online discussion than many shorter-lived prestige or genre shows.

IMDb

The Middle

ABC’s family sitcom quietly ran for nine seasons and earned steady ratings and strong reviews. Even so, The Middle rarely gets brought up in modern sitcom discourse despite being consistently well-liked.

IMDb

Criminal Minds

Despite a devoted fanbase and long network success, Criminal Minds often lived in a strange middle ground. It was undeniably popular, but online discussion usually centered more on trendier dramas than this crime-based staple.

IMDb

Last Man Standing

Tim Allen’s sitcom posted reliable ratings across ABC and later Fox. Yet despite surviving cancellation and returning on another network, it rarely became a major online talking point outside brief industry coverage.

IMDb

Without a Trace

This CBS series was one of television’s most-watched dramas during parts of the 2000s. Despite that success, it now feels oddly forgotten compared to other crime shows from the same era.

IMDb

Cold Case

With strong ratings and a lengthy CBS run, Cold Case was once a dependable hit. Still, it rarely appears in online nostalgia conversations despite being a recognizable part of 2000s television.

IMDb

Major Crimes

As a successful continuation of The Closer, Major Crimes ran for six seasons with respectable cable ratings. Yet it never seemed to generate the same level of online chatter as bigger crime franchises.

IMDb

The Good Wife

Critically acclaimed and consistently respected, The Good Wife had strong ratings and awards recognition. Even so, compared to other prestige dramas from its era, it often feels under-discussed online.

IMDb

Mom

Chuck Lorre’s sitcom lasted eight seasons and maintained reliable CBS viewership. While praised for performances and balancing comedy with heavier themes, Mom rarely became a lasting internet obsession.

IMDb

Castle

Castle mixed storytelling with a fan-favorite central dynamic and solid ABC ratings. But despite long popularity, online conversation around it feels much quieter today than many comparable network hits.

IMDb

Judging Amy

Once a reliable ratings performer for CBS, Judging Amy ran for six seasons and reached large audiences. Yet it is rarely mentioned in current TV discussions despite being a significant early-2000s drama.

IMDb

CSI: NY

Part of one of TV’s biggest franchises, CSI: NY posted strong ratings and lasted nine seasons. Still, it often lived in the shadow of CSI and CSI: Miami online.

IMDb

Everybody Loves Raymond

One of the biggest sitcom hits of its era, Everybody Loves Raymond was critically praised and hugely watched. Yet modern internet sitcom discussions often skip past it in favor of louder cult favorites.

IMDb

Army Wives

Lifetime’s drama became one of the network’s most successful original shows and ran for seven seasons. Despite respectable popularity and loyal viewers, it rarely surfaces in broader streaming-era TV conversations.

15 Tragedies Staining Hollywood’s History

For all the glamour, fame, and cultural milestones Hollywood is known for, there is also a darker legacy shaped by tragedy, scandal, and unresolved controversy. These are incidents that exposed dangerous working conditions, criminal cases, public cover-up accusations, or events that permanently changed how the industry operated.

The loss itself was devastating for most of these cases, although the surrounding questions, legal fallout, or ethical failures kept the stories alive for decades. They left lasting marks on Hollywood’s reputation, exposing the darker side behind one of entertainment’s most powerful industries.

IMDb

The Rust Shooting

In 2021, cinematographer Halyna Hutchins was killed and director Joel Souza was injured when a prop gun held by Alec Baldwin discharged on the set of Rust. The tragedy reignited major debates over set safety and live firearms.

IMDb

The Death of Robin Williams

Robin Williams’ 2014 death shocked Hollywood and initially fueled intense public discussion around depression and suicide. Later revelations that he had severe Lewy body dementia added another painful layer, reshaping how many viewed the tragedy and its misunderstood circumstances.

IMDb

Brandon Lee’s Death on The Crow

Brandon Lee was fatally wounded in 1993 after a prop gun malfunction on The Crow. A lodged projectile and production failures turned the accident into one of Hollywood’s most infamous and widely discussed on-set tragedies.

IMDb

The Death of Marilyn Monroe

Marilyn Monroe’s 1962 death was ruled a probable suicide, but its circumstances fueled decades of scrutiny, conspiracy theories, and controversy. Beyond personal tragedy, it exposed the intense pressure and instability surrounding Hollywood stardom.

IMDb

Sharon Tate and the Manson Murders

In 1969, actress Sharon Tate and four others were murdered by followers of Charles Manson at her Los Angeles home. The killings deeply rattled Hollywood and became symbolic of a darker end to the 1960s.

IMDb

The Murder of William Desmond Taylor

Director William Desmond Taylor was found shot dead in 1922. The unsolved murder exposed rumors involving drugs, affairs, and studio secrecy, becoming one of early Hollywood’s most enduring and controversial mysteries.

IMDb

Natalie Wood’s Drowning

Natalie Wood drowned near Catalina Island in 1981 while aboard a yacht with Robert Wagner and Christopher Walken. Questions, reopened investigations, and disputed accounts kept the circumstances controversial for decades.

IMDb

Judith Barsi’s Murder

Child actress Judith Barsi, known for voice work in The Land Before Time, was murdered in 1988 by her father, who also killed her mother before taking his own life. The case highlighted domestic abuse warning failures.

IMDb

The Murder of Lana Turner’s Boyfriend

In 1958, Lana Turner’s teenage daughter Cheryl Crane fatally stabbed Turner’s boyfriend, mob-linked Johnny Stompanato, during a domestic confrontation. The sensational case became one of classic Hollywood’s most explosive scandals.

IMDb

The Death of Jon-Erik Hexum

Actor Jon-Erik Hexum died in 1984 after firing a blank-loaded prop gun against his head while joking on set. The freak accident exposed serious misunderstandings about blank ammunition dangers in film and television production.

IMDb

The Death of George Reeves

Superman actor George Reeves died from a gunshot wound in 1959, officially ruled a suicide. However, disputed evidence and lingering questions made his death one of Hollywood’s most controversial unsolved celebrity tragedies.

IMDb

The Murder-Suicide of Phil Hartman

Actor and comedian Phil Hartman was murdered in 1998 by his wife, Brynn Hartman, before she died by suicide. The tragedy devastated Hollywood and sparked renewed conversations about addiction and domestic violence.

IMDb

The Rebecca Schaeffer Murder

Actress Rebecca Schaeffer was murdered in 1989 by an obsessed stalker at her home. Her death sparked major concerns about celebrity privacy and directly influenced tougher anti-stalking laws in the United States.

IMDb

The Death of Anton Yelchin

Anton Yelchin died in 2016 after being pinned by his Jeep Grand Cherokee due to a gearshift design issue later tied to recalls. His shocking death raised broader safety concerns beyond Hollywood itself.

IMDb

The Death of David Carradine

David Carradine was found dead in a Bangkok hotel room in 2009. Authorities ruled it an accidental death, but conflicting reports, speculation, and intense media coverage made it one of Hollywood’s more controversial celebrity deaths.

15 Hollywood Stars Who Spoke Out, and Were Silenced

Hollywood movies sell the idea that speaking out is brave, that if you stand up for what you believe in, you’ll be rewarded at the end. Well, that isn’t often the case in reality, much less in the entertainment industry. Over the decades, actors and actresses who challenged abuse, exposed unfair treatment, or took controversial public stands found themselves facing backlash, or at least career slowdowns.

If they were lucky, they were ignored. If not, they were openly pushed aside. With tales tied to politics, workplace misconduct, or industry power struggles, these stories reveal how difficult it has often been for stars to challenge systems bigger than themselves.

Brendan Fraser and Rachel Weisz in The Mummy Returns
IMDb

Brendan Fraser

After alleging he was groped by former HFPA president Philip Berk in 2003, Brendan Fraser later said the experience and aftermath contributed to his retreat from Hollywood. His leading-man career noticeably stalled for years before his major comeback.

IMDb

Rose McGowan

Rose McGowan became one of Harvey Weinstein’s most outspoken accusers during the #MeToo movement. She repeatedly said speaking up about sexual abuse damaged her career long before the allegations became public, leaving her largely outside mainstream Hollywood.

IMDb

Mira Sorvino

Mira Sorvino’s career slowdown became a major Hollywood scandal after Peter Jackson said Weinstein discouraged him from casting her. Sorvino had resisted Weinstein’s advances, and the case became one of the clearest examples of retaliation harming careers.

IMDb

Ashley Judd

Ashley Judd accused Harvey Weinstein of sexual harassment and later sued him, alleging he derailed career opportunities after she rejected him. Her claims became one of the highest-profile examples of alleged industry retaliation against actresses.

IMDb

Corey Feldman

Corey Feldman spent years publicly alleging child abuse was widespread in Hollywood. He repeatedly said speaking out hurt his reputation and opportunities, becoming a controversial figure while claiming the industry shut him out.

IMDb

Katherine Heigl

Katherine Heigl openly criticized Grey’s Anatomy working conditions and later publicly questioned some of her own projects. Though not formally blacklisted, she became widely labeled “difficult,” and her major studio momentum sharply cooled afterward.

IMDb

Sondra Locke

After her legal and personal battle with Clint Eastwood, Sondra Locke publicly accused him and Warner Bros. of undermining her directing career. Her case became a major example of power imbalance affecting opportunities in Hollywood.

IMDb

Mo’Nique

Mo’Nique publicly accused Lee Daniels, Tyler Perry, and Oprah Winfrey of unfair treatment after disputes tied to Precious promotion. She later said refusing certain campaign expectations contributed to years of diminished mainstream roles.

IMDb

Melissa Barrera

After publicly posting pro-Palestinian views during the Israel-Gaza war, Melissa Barrera was dropped from the Scream franchise. The case sparked industry debate over speech, politics, and whether speaking out carried professional consequences.

IMDb

Jane Fonda

Jane Fonda’s outspoken anti-Vietnam War activism made her deeply controversial in Hollywood and America. While still successful, parts of the industry and public treated her as politically radioactive for years because of her activism.

IMDb

Richard Gere

Richard Gere’s public criticism of China and advocacy for Tibet reportedly complicated his access to certain studio-backed productions and global financing. His case is often cited when politics collided with Hollywood business realities.

IMDb

Susan Sarandon

Susan Sarandon repeatedly said outspoken political activism affected her career opportunities. After years of strong public criticism of wars and political institutions, she became one of Hollywood’s clearest examples of activism affecting employability.

IMDb

Vanessa Marquez

Former ER actress Vanessa Marquez publicly accused George Clooney and others of helping blacklist her after workplace complaints. Clooney denied involvement, but her case became a widely discussed dispute over retaliation claims.

IMDb

Charlie Sheen

After his public war with Two and a Half Men creator Chuck Lorre and studio leadership, Charlie Sheen said he had effectively been blacklisted from major entertainment opportunities. His career never regained prior momentum.

IMDb

Roscoe “Fatty” Arbuckle

One of old Hollywood’s harshest examples, Arbuckle’s career collapsed after a scandal and trials where he was ultimately acquitted. Even after legal vindication, public backlash and studio pressure largely ended his stardom.

Backrooms Review: A24 Expansion of YouTube Series Goes in Circles

I never liked fluorescent lighting. Often aggressively bright, the hum of the once ubiquitous mercury-vapor tube always felt like threatened cheerfulness. It’s a forced smile stretched across a pained face. Wunderkind YouTuber and now bonafide big-screen director Kane Parsons would seem to agree. For his feature-film debut at A24, Backrooms, the 20-year-old content creator returns to a late 20th century setting and variety of corporate luminescence that he’s probably too young to remember firsthand. And it is undeniably eerie, if intermittently so.

The labyrinthine hell of Backrooms’ title exists in a liminal space of endless corridors and winding atriums which appear to carry on into oblivion. Occupying a nether-realm that borders between Office Space and a magical realist Brazil, the titular purgatory offers up vacant mindscapes beneath that deceitful, fluorescent glow. As someone who until a few weeks ago was unfamiliar with Parsons’ YouTube series of the same name, it’s easy to see why Backrooms became a viral sensation. The unnerving blankness of the compositions suggest a queasy counterpoint to the pull toward nostalgia in so much modern media. What are the backrooms of the title if not the detritus of a decayed American culture from ye olden days that’s been left to rot?

Yet the cold emptiness of Backrooms’ imagery, which was so compelling for YouTube subscribers in nine-minute, CG-enhanced bit sizes, becomes something of an albatross around the wholly live-action feature. Parsons and screenwriter Will Soodik tease out a few intriguing ideas about what the backrooms could really be, but that’s all they are. Teases. When tasked with creating something that approaches a cohesive narrative—and a story that confirms tangible internal logic if not necessarily clear-cut explanations for the creepy imagery—Backrooms can only double down on a vague aloofness. The oppressive nature of this seems intentional. The exhaustion and faint tedium less so.

The gist of how we end up in this realm is simple enough, however. Clark (Chiwetel Ejiofor) is an unhappy, middle-aged divorcée living in the 1990s suburbs. About once a week he goes to therapy simply so someone other than an employee will listen to his complaints. Still, psychologist Mary (Renate Reinsve) seems to be putting in an effort to remain blandly reassuring as Clark continues to vent about his ex-wife.

The rest of the week, Clark seems to live day and night at his warehouse furniture store, Cap’n Clark’s, which also happens to have a rat and circuit-breaker problem in the basement. It’s likewise on that sub-level that Clark discovers he can walk through a single spot in a wall. It proves to be a portal to… somewhere. The bad place. What’s curious is that after his initial shock upon this discovery, Clark seems to kind of like it down there. Even after being seemingly chased by the only other living soul in these cavernous hallways—a mysterious, unseen force—he cannot wait to lure staffers Bobby (Finn Bennett) and Kat (Lukita Maxwell) into the backrooms. And like the YouTube series, they decide to bring a VHS camera with them for the trip.

When viewed as a metaphor for the quirks, mysteries, and even monstrosities of a human subconscious, a hideous id, there is something potent about Clark’s descent down the rabbit hole of Backrooms. Like Alice, here is a fella who cannot help but dig deeper into skewed hallways of canted angles, forced perspectives, and grotesque interior design choices. One passageway narrows into little more than a coffin in a sequence that overtly echoes Lewis Carroll.

And as couched in therapy-speak about the loops and tunnels of the human mind, courtesy of Norwegian treasure Reinsve, Backrooms more than once seems on the verge of discovering a thesis for what is ultimately one of the most polished exercises in a found footage haunted house I’ve ever seen. Unfortunately more often, the picture seems content to simply run in circles, mixing its metaphors and stumbling over what I’ve been assured is a complex, mysterious mythology in the web series.

In its own odd way, the cumulative effect reminds me of more than one recent video game movie adaptation. It is so determined to preserve and recreate the lore and iconography of its source material that the narratives and characters become secondary and ultimately obligatory.

This is not to say they’re poorly performed. Ejiofor has always been a somewhat underrated actor and brings a self-pitying neediness to Clark that’s understated but unmistakable. Reinsve, so dynamic in The Worst Person in the World and Sentimental Value, is given a less fully formed character, unfortunately. Mary seems to exist primarily to have an extra perspective to walk through the looking glass after Clark decides he likes it just fine down in Wonderland.

The final movements of the film, in particular, which make the classic mistake of showing the impossible Lovecraftian monster and seemingly setting up a sequel or franchise, feel especially rote for a horror film released in the same month as Obsession and Hokum.

Parsons shows a lot of promise in Backrooms, revealing a keen eye and ear for conjuring an oppressive atmosphere and visually arresting gloom. His first feature just feels strangely like an awkward attempt at IP-extension as opposed to a fully fleshed out idea; a concept that could have been a short. In fact, it already is several of them.

Backrooms opens on Friday, May 29.

Paddington 4’s Writer Selection Hints at Political Satire for England’s Most Famous Bear

As the world heads toward unprecedented corruption, governmental collapse, and extreme polarization, at least we have Paddington, an adorable protagonist and a shining light of optimistic apolitical escapism to turn to. Even that, however, may be changing with the arrival of his latest sequel, Paddington 4.

Armando Iannucci, the cynical genius behind the hit show Veep and dark comedy The Death of Stalin, has been tapped to write the fourth installment of the critical darling Paddington series alongside his writing partner Simon Blackwell. 

Satire has defined Iannucci’s career. His early time in radio and broadcast television established him as “the hardman of political satire,” according to the Daily Telegraph, and led to his position at the head of the British comedy series The Thick of It and movie sequel In the Loop

Government dysfunction is a staple throughout most of Iannucci’s work — The Thick of It spins nightmarishly incompetent yet entertaining tales of the bureaucratic British government, while Veep takes on the often sociopathic psyche of American politicians working within a poorly-constructed system. The Death of Stalin fictionalizes the real actions of high-ranking officials in the Soviet Union as they desperately grasp for power after (you guessed it) the death of dictator Joseph Stalin. 

Paddington is not a political satire by any means. Paddington Bear loves marmalade jam, his adoptive family the Browns, and the Queen of England. His bumbling adventures are PG at their most extreme. Given this, Iannucci’s invitation onto the production budget of Paddington 4 may seem out of place.

However, Iannucci’s sense of humor and previous experience delving into human nature will potentially give audiences a deeper understanding of Paddington the character and could provide a more insightful social critique than the previous Paddington films have. Iannucci is also familiar with screen adaptations, having written and directed the critically acclaimed The Personal History of David Copperfield

Iannucci is no stranger to stories with absurd premises. His previous work in political satire has prepared him to tell the story of a small anthropomorphic bear, his 100-year-old anthropomorphic bear aunt, and the family that adopts him — three ridiculous premises that somehow are less ridiculous than some of the most jarring moments from Veep.

Additionally, the Paddington franchise is more ripe with political undertones than viewers may realize. Paddington 2, the most acclaimed of the three films so far, centers around Paddington’s false imprisonment and the struggles of his family as they attempt to exonerate him. It humanizes the imprisoned people who Paddington befriends, indicts the injustice of Paddington’s arrest, and criticizes the lazy policework of the London authorities. Paddington in Peru explores racial and colonial history alongside all-consuming greed through its central antagonist and plot. The first Paddington takes on the increasingly relevant themes of immigration and cultural assimilation vs. celebration. 

All of these are things Iannucci’s eye for scathing political critique will easily be able to expand upon in the fourth installment of Paddington’s live action journey. At his most personal, Iannucci takes on themes of existentialism and human nature (just watch The Armando Iannucci Shows online). 

Despite Paddington’s taxonomic classification as a bear, few are as human as he. Not everyone should be trusted with telling a story of human nature and political severity packaged in England’s beloved bear, but Iannucci certainly should be.

X-Men ’97 Season 2 Trailer Breakdown: Apocalypse, New Costumes, and More

This article contains details from X-Men comics that could spoil X-Men ’97 season 2.

It’s here, my X-Men! The first trailer for season 2 of X-Men ’97 has arrived, chock-full of the superhero soap opera goodies that made the first season such a sensation. Season 1 proved that X-Men ’97 wanted to be so much more than a nostalgic continuation of the original series, which ran from 1992 to 1997. More than just picking up storylines and adding elements from comics published in the intervening three decades, X-Men ’97 tackled pressing themes about oppression and genocide, portraying them through some of the most striking animation you’ll see outside of an anime.

X-Men ’97 may be more than a throwback Marvel Comics adaptation, but it’s not less than that either. And the first trailer for season 2 is bursting at the seams with plot hints and lore nods. Let’s channel our inner Caliban and hunt them all down!

Time Travel Means Time for a Costume Change

The original Animated Series kept the team in the Jim Lee-designed costumes of the era. But season 2 of X-Men ’97 finally gives our heroes reason to raid the closet.

Storm has done away with the silver outfit for the one that Lee briefly gave her in 1991, a riff on the standard Xavier Institute training uniform, while Wolverine has reverted to his pre-Lee look, returning to the brown and yellow togs he wore throughout the ’80s. Sunspot wears the costume he made after Cable and Cannonball left X-Force (thankfully skipping over the infamous graduation uniforms the New Mutants had).

The most notable costumes are the grey and yellow clothes worn by Jean Grey, Cyclops, and Rogue. Those outfits come directly from Grant Morrison and Frank Quitely’s run in the early 2000s. Partially to reject the idea that the X-Men were superheroes, and partly to bring the comics in line with the leather look of the movies, Morrison and Quitely outfitted the main team in black and grey. Rogue didn’t get one of those cool looks at the time (instead, she was running around in a horrendous red get-up), but it looks like the show will correct that error.

Apocalypse, Then

As the trailer reminds us, season 1 of X-Men ’97 ended with the destruction of Genosha—which took the life of Gambit, among others—and with half the team sent to the past and half to the future. The season two trailer shows what the team finds in each timeline: Apocalypse, first as Egyptian mutant En Sabah Nur and then, centuries from now, as the absolute ruler of Earth.

The trailer gives brief glimpses of En Sabah Nur with the Sandstormers, the tribe who recruits the future supervillain after his people exile him for having grey skin. The Sandstormers instill in En Sabah Nur a belief that only the fittest can survive, and he appears to be testing some poor victim in the trailer.

Eventually, En Sabah Nur will augment his abilities with a suit made from Celestial technology (you remember the Celestials, right? The giant purple god blowing things up in Guardians of the Galaxy? The big hand that started to come out of the Earth in Eternals?). Much later, he’ll conquer the world. And that’s where Cable comes in.

Cable Connections

The time-traveling leader of X-Force, Cable showed up in X-Men: The Animated Series, and at the end of X-Men ’97‘s first season, where we learned the character’s backstory. He was born Nathan Summers, son of Cyclops and a clone of Jean Grey. Infected with an incurable virus by Mister Sinister, Nathan was sent into the far future with Bishop, another time traveler.

The season 2 trailer finds Cyclops and Jean Grey reuniting with their young son in the far future. There, Nathan will train to fight Apocalypse across time, gaining help from the Clan Aksani. Led by Mother Aksani (actually, an aged Rachel Summers, the daughter of Cyclops and Jean Grey from an alternate reality), Cable learns how to control the virus that turns his body into organic steel and gathers the arsenal he’ll use against Apocalypse.

The teenage version of Cable seen in the trailer sometimes resembles Nate Grey, an alternate reality version of Cable who once crossed time to make out with his mother, Marty McFly style, and another time became a Christ figure for the mutants. But that might be a little too weird for X-Men ’97.

The Death of Magik

If all of the Marvel Rivals servers have been shut down today, it’s because of something the players saw in the season 2 trailer: Colossus, cradling the body of his dead sister Illyana, a.ka. Magik. Before canceling your Disney+ subscription, remember that X-Men ’97 is still largely adapting storylines from the ’90s, and Magik wasn’t the major character then that she was now. In fact, she was dead, a casualty of the Legacy Virus.

A clunky AIDS metaphor, the Legacy Virus infected mutants throughout the ’90s, eventually ending when Beast invented a cure, which Colossus tested on himself. The cure worked, but did not end his sorrow over Magik’s death, and so Colossus briefly became a villain, joining the Acolytes. Given that Colossus has only had a few appearances in the Animated Series, he may be more of an antagonist in season 2—at least until his sister resurrects, like she always does.

Psylocke, Deadpool, and… the Draco?

Colossus isn’t the only big cameo in the trailer. Shapeshifter Morph takes the form of Deadpool and we see Rama-Tut, the Ancient Egyptian ruler who (stop me if you’ve heard this one) gets a time travel machine and becomes the Avengers villain Kang the Conquerer. Psylocke returns to the Animated Series, and will probably follow the current comic storylines, in which she’s no longer a white English woman in the body of an Asian woman (Google “Kwannon” and marvel at how long it took to reverse this plotline).

Two more notable additions are Exodus and Danger. Danger, a robot lady with a scary face, comes from the Joss Whedon run that followed Grant Morrison in 2004. The living embodiment of the Danger Room, the VR facility Xavier uses to train his students, Danger can adapt to any challenge and also is a pretty lady who wants others to validate her existence because she was created by Joss Whedon.

The caped swordsman Exodus is more complicated. Once a knight in 12th century France, the mutant known as Exodus was transformed into an undying warrior by Apocalypse, who then left him in captivity for refusing to obey him. Centuries later, Magneto freed Exodus, who has since worshiped the Master of Magnetism as a mutant savior.

But for longtime comics fans, the most compelling part of the trailer may be the depiction of Nightcrawler as a Catholic priest. Nightcrawler’s faith has long been a key part of his character, an ironic turn on his demonic appearance. He eventually became ordained as a priest, and started wearing a clerical collar with his costume, as seen in the trailer.

But in The Draco, a 2003 storyline by Chuck Austen and Takeshi Miyazawa, we learn that Nightcrawler looks like the devil because his dad is the devil. Or, more accurately, his father Azazel (you might remember him played by Jason Flemyng in X-Men: First Class), an ageless mutant on whom stories about Satan are based.

The Draco sucks for so many reasons, not least of all because it means that Nightcrawler is actually a monster and everyone was right to fear him. It would be daring for X-Men ’97 to take it on, but season one managed to redeem some bad storylines, so maybe they can do the same with The Draco.

Polaris, X-Factor, and Generation X

Judging by the marketing thus far, the most important new character in the season 2 trailer is Polaris, the green-haired lady seen looking at some photos. A longtime associate and sometime member of the X-Men, Polaris has the ability to control magnetism, just like Magneto—whom she learned late in life was her father.

Polaris also served on X-Factor, a mutant team sponsored by the U.S. government and led by Cyclops’s brother Havok. X-Factor has gone through many lineups, and marketing materials tend to show Polaris and Havok with the main team from the ’90s, alongside Strong Guy, Multiple Man, Quicksilver, and Wolfsbane. However, X-Factor eventually gains Forge and Shard, the sister of Bishop, as members.

Given that Forge and Bishop team up to find the time-displaced X-Men, Polaris could very well join them to form a different take on X-Factor. However, the trailer shows Polaris alongside Chamber, Monet, and Synch, all of whom were on the more youthful team Generation X, serving alongside Jubilee and under Emma Frost, who also appear in the trailer.

Whatever the line-ups in X-Men ’97, it’s clear that season 2 will draw inspiration from the comics, while going in its own unique direction.

X-Men ’97 season 2 debuts on Disney+ on July 1, 2026.

I Love Boosters Marketing Campaign? Boots Riley Tweets at You

“Gimme your address, I’ll look up the nearest showtime for you and find the best transit route to see I Love Boosters.”

“You have to go see I Love Boosters ASAP. What are you waiting for? How can I move the needle for you?”

“What the fuck Kansas City theaters??? How is no theater playing I Love Boosters???”

These are just some of the posts on X, formerly Twitter, promoting writer-director Boots Riley’s newest film I Love Boosters. Instead of being posted by eager fans, however, these were all posted by Riley himself. 

A quick scroll through Riley’s personal X feed will reveal several days worth of these posts, alongside retweets of praise for his sophomore feature and fans holding tickets to the film, excitedly proclaiming they’ve been “marked safe” from Riley’s online admonishments. 

Starring Keke Palmer, Naomi Ackie, Taylour Paige, and LaKeith Stanfield, I Love Boosters follows a group of women who steal clothes from an expensive retailer owned by a wicked fashion mogul (Demi Moore) and sell them for much cheaper prices. Riley’s vibrant visual and thematic style lends itself perfectly to this Vogue-ready, NEON-produced comedic crime thriller. 

Riley’s most recent outing hit theaters May 22, and was met with rave reviews but hasn’t made a huge dent at the box office. Its earnings have been largely propelled by word-of-mouth marketing, a charge led by the director himself. The traditional marketing for I Love Boosters has been minimal at best, making these posts not only stand out but necessary for the film’s success.

NEON posted a seven-minute video of Riley describing how I Love Boosters came to be and why you need to see it in a theater. All of Riley’s personal social media feeds — not just his X account — have been dedicated to promoting his full-length fashion feature for several days. His tireless fervor to promote his film has spread to other internet users, creating a mass network of I Love Boosters fans attracted to the director’s personal and cinematic brand.

Despite the entertainment value of Riley’s posts and the overall online engagement with the film, it is not necessarily a good thing that one of the freshest voices in film today has to rely on social media to promote his newest production. Marketing a movie in the digital age has proven difficult; fractured between seemingly infinite streaming services, a superabundance of social media platforms, and shortening attention spans. Crafting a promotional strategy that consistently works and is also cost efficient has proven to be next-to-impossible in that environment. 

Additionally, massive mergers and political censorship have put more provocative stories in a hot seat in Hollywood, and promoting them online often drives more vitriolic engagement than positive. For Riley, whose body of work is chock-full of extravagantly surreal stories lambasting the racist exploitation of labor under capitalism, these trends do not bode well for his creations. While he is lucky to have NEON in his corner for I Love Boosters, a studio that has created and supported some of the most daring, critically successful films in recent memory, the barebones promotion of I Love Boosters remains a troubling sign for current film marketing practices.

It’s no wonder Riley would post with a relentlessness eclipsed only by the sun’s rising every morning — commercial success may not guarantee another theatrical release, but it certainly helps. Riley’s first full-length film similarly benefited from word-of-mouth marketing; Sorry to Bother You sextupled its $3 million budget, grossing $18 million. That release earned Riley access to budgets for Prime Video series I’m a Virgo and Boosters

Boosters is currently sitting at a $5.2 million haul against a $20 million budget. Despite the critical acclaim lauded onto his films, Riley needs his tweets to work in order to secure his extremely deserved blockbuster-making future.

Spider-Noir Is the Ultimate Nicolas Cage Highlight Reel

This article contains light spoilers for Spider-Noir.

As its name implies, the MGM+/Prime Video series Spider-Noir is many things. It is a story about Spider-Man, albeit as middle-aged private investigator Ben Reilly, who used to fight crime under the codename “the Spider.” It’s also a noir series, thanks to its postwar setting, its gangster baddies, and its nods toward classic films like Gilda.

But most of all, Spider-Noir is the ultimate highlight reel for its star, Nicolas Cage. As private dick Ben Reilly, Cage gets to take on all sorts of personas, little bits that his character adopts to sneak into a building or get past a secretary. These plot devices give Cage, an actor famous for his strong choices, the opportunity to try out different personalities, personalities that might not work for an entire movie, but are incredible in Spider-Noir‘s bitesize doses.

One of the best occurs in episode five, when a doctor finds Ben Reilly sneaking around her office. Without missing a beat, Cage slips into an impression of Peter Lorre, wrapping his hand around the back of his head to rub his scalp and speaking in smooth, unnerving tones. When the doctor informs him that the person he claims to be looking for is on the second floor, Ben casts a skeptical gaze, starts waving his hands, and demands, in a faux-Hungarian accent, “The second floor? The second floor!”

Lorre is hardly the only old-timey movie star that Cage mimics for Reilly’s shenanigans. The most obvious example occurs when Ben has to retrieve his Spider suit from his former apartment, now remodeled and rented to others. Spying a maintenance closet, Ben grabs a mop and a tool box, flips up his hat brim and dons a pair of thick glasses (a la Humphrey Bogart in The Big Sleep), and introduces himself to the occupants as maintenance man Pete. Pitching up his voice and taking on a slight tremble, Cage as Reilly plays Pete like a sweet old man who’s a bit too comfortable sticking his nose into other peoples’ business, a slightly annoying Jimmy Stewart charcter.

In the very next episode, Ben has to get past a nurse to question some injured cops, so he takes on the identity of Officer Batnick of the Patrolmen’s Benevolent Association, who took “a slug 10 years ago” and was saved by the caretakers at the hospital. Here, Cage becomes a tall, dark Edward G. Robinson, replacing his natural drawl with a clipped accent and punctuating his statements with the word, “See?” Sometimes, he’s charming and clever, mirroring Robinson’s insurance investigator from Double Indemnity. Other times, he’s imperious and threatening, just like Robinson in Little Caesar.

Spider-Noir provides an in-universe explanation for Reilly’s impressions. Late in the series, we learn that he felt like he lost his humanity after gaining his spider-powers, and found his way back by watching the movies. The show even gives an example, with Ben going to the theater to see the James Cagney flick Great Guy, mimicking Jimmy’s delivery of the words, “Red hot!”

However, each of these bits feels like part of Cage’s Saturday Night Live reel. Or, more likely, they feel like moments that the director let Cage do whatever he wanted, knowing that the individual scenes could be clipped and shared online, turning the actor’s endless memeability into free advertising for the show.

Thus, the show frequently stops to let Cage just be weird. A late episode reveals that Ben’s secretary Janet (Karen Rodriguez) has always known that he was the Spider because she walked in on him wearing the costume when he was drunk. Cut to a short montage of Cage playing a drunken gumshoe in a superhero suit, babbling with the mask half over his face or giggling while playing with his goggles.

A more earned, but no less weird, scene occurs shortly after the aging Ben has a battle as the Spider, and returns home to rest for a moment. Before collapsing in his chair, Ben has to stretch and crack his joints, giving Cage an excuse to flail his hands and move his body in a staccato shudder.

To some, these scenes suggest poor direction on the part of showrunners Oren Uziel and Steve Lightfoot, or extreme cynicism on the part of Prime Video and MGM+. One could argue that, instead of providing guidance for their star, the directors simply let Cage do whatever ridiculousness he wanted, running the risk of getting a big, sloppy performance like Joaquin Phoenix‘s nonsense in Joker. One could also argue that Nicolas Cage memes cannot be manufactured, and the attempt to do so is hack.

But, by this point, anyone who puts Nicolas Cage in a project knows that he’s going to get weird. That’s part of the deal when you watch him work. Moreover, Spider-Noir gives reasons for Cage to act these ways, whether it’s Ben’s recovered humanity via the movies or his need to put on a disguise.

Whatever the reason, Cage delights every time he gets a wacky new idea. And they’re short enough that they don’t distract from the show’s central mystery, making Spider-Noir a Spidey story, a hard-boiled detective story, and a Nicolas Cage highlight reel, all in equal measure.

Spider-Noir is now streaming on Amazon Prime and MGM+.

The Future of Horror is Low-Budget, Young, and Very Online

There is no feeling comparable to leaving a theater after a good horror movie. A slight chill hangs in the air while you walk to your car, even in the summer heat. A dreadful thought lingers in the back of your mind that what you watched on screen — no matter how fantastical the scares seem or how stupid the characters’ actions are — could happen to you too. The thrill is terrifying yet intoxicating, beckoning you to the theater every time a new film piques your morbid interest. 

In recent years, that feeling of fear has been propped up by a new generation of filmmakers who share a few common denominators on their resumes. These storytellers are young, have  backgrounds in online content creation, and are all working on relatively shoestring budgets. So far, that combination of youth, new media experience, and thriftiness has been exactly what horror needs to reclaim its status as cinema’s most consistent genre.

YouTube sketch comedy short extraordinaire Curry Barker directed the terrifying Obsession, which hit theaters on May 15 and immediately made an impact with audiences, projecting to make over $100 million on just a $750,000 budget. Mark Fischbach, a.k.a. the extremely popular video game YouTuber Markiplier wrote, directed, and starred in the winter box office’s surprise smash hit Iron Lung on a budget of around $4 million. The incoming A24 Backrooms film, directed by YouTuber Kane Pixels (real name Kane Parsons), will invite theater-goers to traverse stark yellow hallways with just a $10 million budget and is already tracking to triple that at the box office on its opening weekend. 

Each of these filmmakers have sizable followings online in their respective circles, but they are also all relatively green. Fischbach is the oldest at 36 years old, while Parsons is only 20. Despite their nontraditional backgrounds in filmmaking and media production, what they’re doing is working. Obsession has earned rave reviews alongside high-demand in theaters, and Iron Lung exceeded both commercial and critical expectations. Backrooms’ official trailer reached nearly 30 million views in under a month. 

The YouTube-to-horror-director pipeline is not confined to the back half of the 2020s either. Earlier this decade, YouTube comedy duo RackaRacka (Danny and Michael Philippou) directed Talk to Me, summer 2023’s high-octane supernatural thriller. The duo’s directorial followup in 2025, Bring Her Back, upped the disturbing factor without losing the incredible narrative talents developed in their first film. The Phillipous paved the way for the sudden surge in online creators becoming booked-and-busy horror directors, giving viewers a wave of recent horror gems.

Additionally, these films’ modest budgets have demonstrated a more affordable and repeatable model than other recent horror projects including Lee Cronin’s The Mummy ($22 million budget) and The Exorcist: Believer ($30 million budget). Although Cronin’s take on the Mummy concept made back its budget, its reviews were mixed. The Exorcist: Believer similarly turned a profit, but was even more critically derided. Obsession and other small-budget, highly-praised recent productions, such as the Aleshea Harris-directed Southern gothic thriller Is God Is, provide a strong filmmaking formula for the horror genre — trust young creatives to execute their horrifying visions on screen… all on the cheap. 

Instead of expensive nostalgia-oriented reinterpretations of the same stories horror filmmakers have been telling for decades, filmmakers like Barker and Fischbach are bringing new films with authentic perspectives to marquee signs across the world. Many of the pioneers of our current macabre renaissance in horror creativity cut their teeth on the internet, not on a Hollywood set. It’s similar to how the previous generation of ascendant auteurs emerged from the comedy scene like Zach Cregger and Jordan Peele. Indeed, many millennial horror filmmakers have now graduated onto bigger budget horror fare (Cregger’s Weapons, Peele’s Nope, Ryan Coogler’s Sinners) after proving their mettle in the low-budget space (Barbarian, Get Out, Fruitvale Station).

In an industry like Hollywood, where insider connections matter and “making it” is about as hard as climbing Mount Everest, there’s something to be said for inviting people who just want to create in any way possible into the filmmaking sphere. Barker, Parsons, and many more have been uploading videos for years; they’ve found their voices and established themselves as storytellers who can meet audiences where they’re at. 

Being in tune with viewers is something the movie industry desperately needs. Studios are increasingly cutting both production volume and jobs while major film figures are turning to generative AI as a crutch, despite ongoing environmental and creative copyright concerns. Fresh voices who, for better or worse, can make profitable movies with less money without sacrificing production value or narrative quality are a potent cure for medium’s greatest contemporary ailments.  

There are a number of future projects led by YouTubers and content creators for people to look forward to. Parson’s Backrooms releases Friday, and by the looks of it, will deliver the liminal terror Parson has been making on his YouTube channel for years now. Dylan Clark, the filmmaker behind a number of popular horror shorts uploaded to YouTube including Portrait of God is set to bring a new take on the cult classic The Blair Witch Project. Barker, similarly, is planning an original ghost story and a Texas Chainsaw Massacre remake. Fischbach also plans on making more films in the coming years, which are certain to draw both his fans and horror fans to the theater. 

With the demographics making horror films and the demographics watching them now lined up, the future of horror is now in good hands, even if those hands are more used to grasping a video game controller than a camera.

Will X-Men ‘97 Season 2 Follow Through on the Queer Love Story Hidden in Plain Sight? 

With only crumbs of X-Men ‘97 season 2 news to gnaw on, many fans are revisiting the X-Men: The Animated Series revival to refresh memories and, more importantly, take note of any plotlines we may see return in the upcoming season. 

With Pride Month around the corner, one can’t help but wonder if one of the series’ more tender, quietly groundbreaking moments will survive the journey into season 2 or quietly disappear, the way queer storylines sometimes are, unfortunately, destined to do. 

The moment in question is the one shared between Morph and Wolverine in the season finale episode, “Tolerance is Extinction, Part 3.”

Lying in near-death after Magneto yanked all the adamantium from his skeleton, Wolverine clings to life while Morph watches helplessly by his side. In a last desperate attempt to pull Logan back from the edge, Morph does the only thing they can think of; transforming into Jean Grey, the woman Wolverine has always loved, and confesses “I love you, Logan.”

On the surface, it reads as a simple act of comfort, one that could have been easily written off if not for the former showrunner and head writer, Beau DeMayo, confirming on X that this scene was romantic for the shapeshifting hero. As a queer individual himself, DeMayo insisted that Morph’s confession was always intended to be romantic and later compared it to being secretly in love with a close friend and finally finding a way to say it, even if not as yourself.

But with DeMayo having been fired before the series even premiered, the future of this storyline he planted is now uncertain. He may be gone, but the confession isn’t—it’s canon, it’s onscreen, and season 2 is going to have to reckon with it one way or another seeing that it’s one of (if not the most) intriguing plots for Morph’s character.

With the series having faced backlash for Morph being canonically non-binary, using they/they pronouns, and confessing their love to Wolverine, the question becomes whether the new creative team treats it as a thread worth pulling or simply lets it fray quietly away, hoping nobody notices or remembers. The irony here is that potentially forgetting would go against everything the X-Men have ever stood for. 

To understand why that would be such a loss, it helps to remember what the X-Men have always been. Ever since Stan Lee and Jack Kirby launched the comics in 1963, Xavier’s Mutants have served as allegory for a wide array of marginalized groups and topics; the Civil Rights movement, religious persecution, the AIDS crisis. As the decades progressed, the queer metaphor became increasingly fitting too. 

Mutants are born different in a world that fears and hates the identities they never chose. They constantly have to hide who they are from their families and friends, in fear of being judged or taken away by Bastion’s “Zero Tolerance” operation first seen in episode 7. 

Thankfully, many find community among themselves, comforted by the fact that those who get it, get it. But even with the comfort of each other, X-Men who, for years, have fought not just for survival against Sentinels, Mister Sinister, or the literal physical manifestation of the apocalypse, but also for the right to exist. 

If that all sounds familiar, it should because the allegories, no matter in what context, have rarely been subtle. 

And while the Morph confession does fall somewhere between the implicitness of Bobby Drake (Iceman) “coming out” to his parents as a mutant in the 2003 film X2: X-Men United and the explicitness of Mystique and Destiny getting married in Marvel Comics 2024 Marvel Voices: Pride one-shot: X-men: The Wedding Special #1, it serves as another opportunity for the queer X-Men allegory to be done right. 

Which is what makes Morph’s romantic storyline in X-Men ‘97 so significant and worth protecting. The character’s status exists in an interesting middle ground in terms of representation. Their non-binary status, while stated as canon by DeMayo, isn’t actually never directly referred to in the series, a likely deliberate choice seeing that Morph is explicitly referred to as a man in the ‘92 show. 

As for where Morph is currently, the season 2 trailer offered a glimpse of the shapeshifter alongside Wolverine, Sabertooth, and Lady Deathstrike according to The Direct’s early viewing of the trailer at New York Comic Con. The group is seen in a room together, with Morph pondering over “digital video discs” to which Lady Deathstrike scoffs and says that she refers laser discs, possibly clues to what periods of time they are in or from (or both?). 

The update doesn’t offer much in terms of what is to be seen but Morph being with Wolverine offers a glimmer of hope that the love story plot DeMayo planted may be continued, a choice that feels deliberate seeing that the rest of the X-Men were scattered somewhat randomly across time. 

If season 2 picks up the thread and Morph’s feelings are acknowledged, explored, or even just made more explicit by having the hero confess their feelings as themself, then X-Men ‘97 would become something increasingly rare: a mainstream animated superhero series with a canon, developing queer love story for a core cast member. And if Disney is willing to put in the herculean effort of letting the “Wolverine wants Jean Grey but can’t have her” storyline go in favor of exploring his own queerness then that would mean even more progress. 

If it’s dropped, well, that too is a statement and one that is all too familiar. A queer storyline being introduced with intention, abandoned without ceremony, and subsequently mourned in favor of keeping things ambiguous at best or queer-baiting at worst. 

Where the confession will lead and end is yet to be seen and, though some may disagree or agree, it is admittedly not the most important thread for the show to pick up. With Apocalypse in the picture now and the X-Men split-up in several ways (or dead. We all miss you, Gambit), there is a lot on everyone’s plate. 

Still, Morph’s romance storyline is a significant and timely one, and one that may be embedded in the series already as DeMayo had previously finished writing season 2 before current head-writer and showrunner Matthew Chauncy stepped into the role. 

But for now, all fans can do is wait, rewatch the series, and continue to worry about the fates of our beloved mutants. 

Long Gaps, Big Hype: The Strange New Math of TV Release Strategy

If it seems like your favourite show is taking longer and longer breaks between seasons, you’re not imagining it. A new report from Ampere Analysis (via Deadline) has broken down modern TV’s current release strategy and found that larger gaps between seasons of popular shows like Wednesday and Severance are a real trend—and that they seem to be benefiting streamers.

This trend, referred to as “the Stranger Things effect”, was named after Netflix’s popular sci-fi series, which was known for taking its time releasing new seasons as its child actors aged beyond their characters, but the Duffer Brothers’ show isn’t entirely to blame. A decade ago, TV seasons were released every 10 months on average, but the COVID-19 pandemic saw those gaps widen sharply to 16 months, followed by U.S. strikes that pushed the average gap to 21 months. Yet, 2025 saw no change in the average gap, which lingered at 21 months and showed no trend back toward the days of TV’s old annual release model.

Edging viewers with longer release gaps probably seems like a bad idea on the surface, especially when attention spans are arguably shorter, and there’s a constant demand for more, more, more, often fueled by an endless social media scroll that’s happy to deliver. But it turns out that longer gaps between TV seasons are working out pretty well for the streamers making them. Ampere noted that shows with 30+ month gaps had the highest engagement when they finally returned to the small screen.

Figuring out why is pretty easy. The hype simply has more time to build between seasons, and then the pre-release marketing strategy is huge, reminding audiences that the must-watch thing they love is finally coming back. Not only does this catch the interest of people who have been putting off checking out the previous season or the entire series to date, but it prompts people who have forgotten what the hell was going on in the show’s plot to rewatch it ahead of new episodes dropping. You can see the appeal for streamers.

People also stay loyal to these big shows, it seems, no matter how long the gap and how cross they get while waiting for them to return. At least, usually. This strategy does appear to depend on the show’s genre. Sci-fi and fantasy projects need lengthy effects work, and audiences tend to understand that. Comedy shows are less fortunate: the longer the gap, the less willing people are to wait. Meanwhile, crime and thriller shows seem to do okay, no matter how long the gap between seasons, which would explain why there seem to be so many new crime and thriller shows shooting their shot every month on streaming.

Of course, this new release gap strategy has risks. The longer a big show goes without a new season, the more people ask themselves whether it’s worth maintaining their subscription while they wait. A U.S. Q1 2026 survey found that over half of respondents were likely to cancel a subscription if they weren’t using it much, which Ampere wants content providers to be mindful of.

“Many Original shows build highly dedicated audiences that remain loyal despite increasingly long waits between seasons,” Christen Tamisin, Senior Analyst at Ampere Analysis, said in a statement. “However, streamers need to balance blockbuster production timelines against a steady flow of content.”

Spider-Noir Cleans Up an Infamous Spider-Man Debacle

This post contains spoilers for Spider-Noir, and also 30-year-old comic books.

Every part of Spider-Noir has the senses of every viewer tingling, with its gangster movie take on Spider-Man‘s adventures. But the most shocking moment may come when our hero Ben Reilly (Nicolas Cage) meets an elderly stranger. When the stranger (Andrew Robinson) reveals that he’s actually much younger than Ben, that he went by the nickname “Freckles” when they were both in the military, we learn a compelling secret: Ben Reilly isn’t Ben Reilly. Instead, he was born under a different name, a name he changed to Ben Reilly after the war.

Freckles doesn’t tell us Ben’s real name, but the reveal is enough to warn any reader of Spider-Man comics that danger is coming. Any mention of Ben Reilly and mistaken identity brings to mind the first time Ben Reilly appeared in the comics, an infamous debacle known today as The Clone Saga.

The Death of Gwen, The Birth of Ben

The Clone Saga actually dates back to the mid-1970s, shortly after the death of Gwen Stacy in Amazing Spider-Man #121–122 (1973). In the next year’s Amazing Spider-Man #129, by Gerry Conway and Ross Andru, we meet a new supervillain called the Jackal, a mysterious guy in green fur (who has just won over a guy called the Punisher, also making his first appearance). Soon, we learn that the Jackal is biology professor Miles Warren, who long harbored feelings for his student Gwen. Blaming Spider-Man for her death, the Jackal sought revenge by creating a clone to destroy the Wall-Crawler.

That story seemed more or less finished in 1975’s Amazing Spider-Man #149, with the clone apparently dying in an explosion. Flash-forward two decades to 1994, when a mystery man said to look exactly like Peter Parker begins appearing. Although the stories left open the possibility that the mystery man was Peter, who was suffering from a nervous breakdown that made him think of Spider-Man as a separate identity, the Power and Responsibility arc that ran across the four series published at the time—Web of Spider-Man, Amazing Spider-Man, Spider-Man, and Spectacular Spider-Man—established that the clone made by Miles Warren had lived.

After some hero-on-hero fighting, Peter and the clone come to an arrangement. The clone takes the name Ben Reilly, after the first name of his uncle and the surname of his Aunt May, and begins fighting crime as the Scarlet Spider. At the same time, more clones appear, including another copy of Peter called Kaine and a clone of Miles Warren, once again masquerading as the Jackal.

So far, so good, right? Yes, there are a few too many clones, but nothing that out of the ordinary for a superhero comic. Plus, Marvel gets a few new Spider-people to play with, just as the novelty of Venom has worn off.

What A Tangled Web We Weave…

But that’s when Marvel editorial gets an idea. The brass had long worried that Spider-Man comics had lost the plot. Peter Parker began as a teenager, and his stories from the ’70s portrayed him as a young adult who had to balance dates, money troubles, and freelance jobs with his superheroing. By the mid-’90s, Peter had grown up, married super-model and actress Mary Jane, and the two were expecting a baby.

They saw the emergence of Ben Reilly as their ticket out. Thus, the stories began to retcon the original Clone story from 1975. The comics revealed that the explosion in Amazing Spider-Man #149 gave Peter amnesia, and it was the clone who walked away from the wreckage. The man we knew as Ben Reilly was in fact the true Peter Parker. The man we’ve been following as Peter, the man who married Mary Jane and was expecting a child, was in fact the clone.

So Marvel attempted a great switcharoo. The Peter we’ve been following dyed his hair blonde and moved to the West Coast with Mary Jane, taking on the identity of Ben Reilly. The guy we thought was a clone took up his rightful name of Peter Parker, and stayed in New York City as Spider-Man.

At least, that’s what Marvel started to do. When word of the company’s plans got out, fans revolted, not buying the simple solution that Marvel pitched. And so, several issues later, it turns out that Ben Reilly was the clone, and our Peter was the real Peter all along. And also his hair was going to stay brown. And also, he’s staying in New York.

If this summary sounds messy, the execution was even worse. Not only did editorial take what began as a slightly ambitious and ridiculous sci-fi story and spiral it into a spaghetti mess that changed on the fly, but they also stuffed their resolution with the return of Norman Osborn, who had been dead since he accidentally impaled himself after killing Gwen Stacy back in 1974, and the disappearance of Peter and MJ’s baby. Oh, and also Aunt May seemed to die again, but it turns out she’s alive.

A Simple Saga

To this day, The Clone Saga stands as the ultimate example of editorial run amuck. And yet, Marvel keeps returning to it again and again. The Clone Saga was adapted into The Animated Series, remade in the Ultimate Universe, and given sequels. Even poor Miles Morales got his own Clone Saga in recent years.

Spider-Noir does have a mad scientist, so it’s not entirely out of the realm of possibility that some clone shenanigans could be afoot. But going by Freckles’s intimation, Spider-Noir may give us the best possible version of the story, with Peter changing his name to Ben Reilly after the war, to get a fresh start from the horrors he experienced. At least, this version of the story won’t give comics fans terrifying flashbacks.

Spider-Noir is now streaming on MGM+ and Prime Video.

Strange New Worlds Nearly Pulled Off a Big Original Series Twist

It’s a different life, Jim, not as we know it, and it almost happened in Strange New Worlds. The creative minds behind the Star Trek show have revealed that their biggest regret has been not getting the chance to do an episode that would have explored what might have happened if William Shatner’s Captain James T. Kirk had decided to remain in New York with Edith Keeler (Joan Collins) in The Original Series installment “The City on the Edge of Forever”—and they planned to bring back Shatner for it, too.

In conversation with Polygon, Strange New Worlds showrunners Akiva Goldsman and Alex Kurtzman confirmed they’d been working to make Shatner’s return possible for that alternate-universe story since the show began, and even penned a few scripts for it.

“I think if you get to the end and there’s nothing left for you to want to do, then that’s more of a disappointment,” Kurtzman explained about his and Goldsman’s lingering Strange New Worlds regrets. “I’m proud of every episode we’ve done, but I feel like the best dinners you come to don’t leave you feeling stuffed. They leave you wanting more.”

In the acclaimed episode of The Original Series, Dr. McCoy accidentally overdosed on a powerful drug and traveled through a time portal called the Guardian of Forever. In doing so, he drastically altered history, and the Enterprise ceased to exist. Kirk and Spock tracked him to 1930s New York City, where Kirk fell in love with Keeler, only to discover that her survival would delay America’s entry into WWII and allow the Nazis to win. Heartbroken, Kirk let Edith die to restore the timeline.

Since such a pivotal moment in Earth’s history hinged on Edith’s demise, it would have been fascinating to find out what might have happened if she hadn’t bought the farm; kind of like Star Trek’s version of Man in the High Castle.

Instead, Strange New Worlds will boldly go ahead with its final seasons Shatner-less but with a lot of fun stuff in the offing, including an episode where Captain Christopher Pike (Anson Mount) gets turned into a puppet during a transporter accident. Kurtzman and Goldsman also noted that the season 3 mind-meld between Kirk (Paul Wesley) and Spock (Ethan Peck) would have a significant impact on both characters over the remaining episodes.

“We know what they’re like in The Original Series, but we don’t know how they got there,” Kurtzman said. “You don’t want to just come in and give people exactly what they expect at the end. It would get really boring. We wanted to give each of them something to strive for as a character, something to learn about each other, something to be surprised by. That continues this season in a big way.”

Star Trek: Strange New Worlds season 4 will stream on Paramount+ starting July 23.

Spider-Noir: 5 Classic Film Noirs That Shaped the Spider-Man Adventure

For a show about a guy whose radioactive blood allows him to shoot webs and crawl walls, Spider-Noir has surprisingly little to do with the superhero that inspired it. Not only does it star Nicolas Cage as Ben Reilly instead of Peter Parker, and not only does it eschew contentions like Uncle Ben and a blue and red suit, but Spider-Noir doesn’t even have that much in common with the 2009 Marvel Comics series Spider-Man: Noir or the movie Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse.

This isn’t to say that Spider-Noir has no antecedent. Rather, its touchstones are found on the screen, not the comics page. Showrunners Oren Uziel and Steve Lightfoot used the superhero show as an opportunity to pay tribute to some of their favorite crime movies of the 1930s and ’40s. For audiences drawn in by the lure of Spider-Man, Spider-Noir also serves as a primer, pointing them towards some of the greatest entries in the film noir genre, including these five classics.

Great Guy (1936)

Early in the fourth episode of Spider-Noir, Ben Reilly flaunts his noir fan creds by going to a theater to watch Great Guy, one of the lesser known crime outings for James Cagney. Although a song and dance man at heart, Cagney made his name in crime pictures like The Public Enemy, The Big Heat, and the J. Edgar Hoover-approved G-Men, in which Cagney brings his tough guy persona to law, wearing a badge as a member of the FBI.

Great Guy veers closer to G-Men than it does his more famous crime films, as he plays former boxer Johnny Cave, now an agent of the Department of Weights and Measures, assigned to investigate corrupt politician Marty Cavanaugh. Perhaps because Eliot Ness caught Al Capone on tax evasion charges, pencil pushers like Cave were frequent heroes in 1930s movies, provided that they still got off a few gun shots and got in a few gut punches. It’s easy to see why the morally-conflicted Ben Reilly would be interested in Great Guy, with its tale of a bad man trying to do good in a world filled with untrustworthy leaders.

The Maltese Falcon (1941)

Cage has made no secret about his admiration for Humphrey Bogart, and several of Bogie’s best parts inform his performance. We’ll talk about one in particular shortly, but the power dynamics between Reilly and his nemesis Silvermane (Brendan Gleeson) recall the relationship between Bogart’s private investigator Sam Spade and Kasper Gutman, the domineering rich man played by Sydney Greenstreet, in The Maltese Falcon.

Based on the novel by Dashiell Hammett and written and directed by John Huston, The Maltese Falcon follows the amoral Spade, who initially takes a job to track down the missing sister for a client (Mary Astor), which results in the murder of his partner and in a new task, to find a statue of the titular bird for Gutman. On the page and on the screen, The Maltese Falcon establishes the genre’s reputation for over-plotting. Ben Reilly can understand Spade’s frustration as a simple arson case balloons into a conspiracy that goes far beyond New York City.

Gilda (1946)

No noir is complete without a femme fatale, a beautiful woman who lures the hero deeper into trouble, against his better judgment. Charles Vidor’s Gilda gave the genre one of its all-time greats with Rita Hayworth as lounge singer Gilda Mundson. Gilda is the wife of Ballin Mudson (George Macready), a gangster living in Buenos Aires, who chooses not to punish American Johnny Farrell (Glenn Ford) for counting cards in his casino. Instead, Mudson hires Farrell to watch over Gilda, a job made easier by the affection she shows him.

But is it true love? Or does Gilda want to pit the hard-luck Farrell against her powerful husband? The answer isn’t as clean as you’d think, which might be why a movie-watcher like Ben Reilly doesn’t pick up on the similarities between his situation and that of Farrell. When lounge singer Cat Hardy (Li Jun Li) walks into his office and makes romantic overtures, Reilly’s cynical defenses melt. And when Hardy performs a big musical number in the first episode, Reilly’s just as dumbstruck as Johnny Farrell watching Gilda Mundson sing “Put the Blame on Mame.”

The Big Sleep (1946)

Speaking with Den of Geek, Cage identified playfulness as one of his favorite elements about Bogie. That might come as a surprise to those who only know the actor by reputation, assuming he always plays a stoic tough. But when Reilly puts on a silly hat and thick glasses to impersonate a janitor, Cage is borrowing from Bogie as well. Namely, he’s mimicking a moment in The Big Sleep, in which Bogart’s Philip Marlowe dons a pair of nerdy glasses and an upturned hat to question a bookseller.

In The Big Sleep, directed by Howard Hawks and based on the novel by Raymond Chandler, Marlowe becomes a nerd (and then returns to his normal self for a much steamier interrogation with the clerk across the street) on behalf of his client General Sternwood (Charles Waldron), who hired the PI to look into the actions of his daughters (Lauren Bacall and Martha Vickers). The search leads him through bookstores and into the world of lowlifes and gangsters, with a plot so convoluted that not even Chandler could follow it. But what The Big Sleep lacks in clarity, it makes up for with thrilling performances, performances that inspire Cage’s take on Ben Reilly.

The Lady From Shanghai (1947)

It would be a spoiler to get into too much detail about how and when Spider-Noir borrows from The Lady From Shanghai. Suffice it to say, Uziel and Lightfoot love Orson Welles movies, and paid homage to one of the most dazzling sequences from the auteur’s 1947 picture, which co-starred Rita Hayworth in another sizzling femme fatale performance.

Welles plays Michael O’Hara, an Irish sailor who falls for Elsa Bannister (Hayworth), wife of disabled attorney Arthur (Everett Sloane). Smitten by Elsa, Michael agrees to serve on Bannister’s yacht, where he agrees to help the attorney’s partner Grisby (Glenn Anders) fake his own death, hoping that the reward will finance a future with Elsa. Instead, Michael finds himself caught in an ever-evolving plot, filled with deception and dissemblances, which Welles visualizes with a still-impressive sequence in a house of mirrors. The sequence sets a standard that even modern shows like Spider-Noir, with all their special effects, aspire to match.

Spider-Noir is available to stream on MGM+ and Prime Video now.

15 Good Movies That Shoehorned in a Romance for No Reason

Romance has its place in plenty of movie genres, making us care for the different characters on screen and their goals. Now, unless you are watching an actual romance film, the feelings one character feels for another might be taking up space, stealing it for what you’re actually here to see. More often than not, that’s action.

But summer blockbusters need the emotional glue that ties a story together, even when done half-heartedly. As such, movies that didn’t really need the emotional anchor beat audiences over their heads with it, making us wish it wasn’t so. These are the films with some of the worst romances in movie history.

IMDb

The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug

Peter Jackson’s fantasy sequel added a love triangle between Tauriel, Kíli, and Legolas, despite Tauriel not existing in Tolkien’s novel. It was an unnecessary romance layered onto an already crowded adventure.

IMDb

Pearl Harbor

Michael Bay’s war drama centers heavily on a romantic triangle between Rafe, Evelyn, and Danny, often overshadowing the historical tragedy itself. Critics frequently argued the romance felt forced into a much stronger wartime story.

IMDb

Jurassic World

The relationship between Owen Grady and Claire Dearing becomes a recurring emotional thread, but much of the film’s appeal comes from dinosaur chaos and survival. Their romance often felt secondary and oddly obligatory.

IMDb

King Kong (2005)

While emotional attachment between Ann Darrow and Kong is central, the added romantic tension between Ann and Jack Driscoll often felt underdeveloped compared to the much larger spectacle and tragedy around them.

IMDb

Top Gun

Pete “Maverick” Mitchell’s romance with Charlie is iconic to some, but it has been long argued the love story feels wedged between aerial combat, rivalry, and military drama that already carried the film.

IMDb

I Am Legend

The late-film emotional bond implied between Robert Neville and Anna feels unnecessary. Much of the story already worked as isolation horror and survival drama without leaning toward human romantic tension.

IMDb

Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides

The romance between missionary Philip Swift and mermaid Syrena takes up surprising screen time in a pirate adventure already packed with Blackbeard, Jack Sparrow, and the Fountain of Youth storyline.

IMDb

The Matrix Reloaded

Neo and Trinity were already established, but the sequel leans harder into romantic urgency, especially around prophecy and sacrifice. The emotional focus occasionally interrupted the larger philosophical and action-heavy plot.

IMDb

The Mummy Returns

Rick and Evie were already established, but the sequel adds a flirtation between Ardeth Bay and Nefertiri through reincarnation mythology that never becomes emotionally important. It bogs down things with extra romantic layering in an already overloaded supernatural adventure.

IMDb

Dawn of the Dead (2004)

Zack Snyder’s zombie remake is mostly survival horror, but the hinted emotional connection between Ana and Kenneth often feels lightly inserted rather than essential. The film’s strongest focus stays on siege tension and collapse.

IMDb

Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen

Sam and Mikaela’s relationship returns as emotional glue, but much of it feels overshadowed by giant robot warfare, mythology, and spectacle. Their romantic beats often came across as routine blockbuster obligation.

IMDb

The Last Samurai

Nathan Algren’s implied romantic tension with Taka adds an unnecessary emotional thread to a story already centered on war, grief, and cultural conflict. It remains understated but noticeably shoehorned.

IMDb

Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull

Indy’s reunion with Marion revives an old romance, but much of it feels inserted between alien mythology, chase scenes, and family revelations. Their chemistry matters less than the larger adventure surrounding them.

IMDb

War of the Worlds (2005)

Steven Spielberg’s alien invasion thriller is driven by survival and family panic, but the brief rekindled emotional tension between Ray Ferrier and his ex-wife Mary Ann adds little beyond background motivation.

IMDb

Independence Day

Romantic subplots involving David Levinson and Constance, along with Steven Hiller and Jasmine, feel forced. Many viewers remember the alien invasion spectacle far more than the love stories surrounding it.

15 Times James Bond Drove a Car That Wasn’t an Aston

While 007 will be forever linked to Aston Martin, he has spent plenty of time behind the wheel of other memorable cars. Across the franchise, Bond has driven everything from practical sedans and muscle cars to Lotus sports cars, BMWs, and even surprisingly humble vehicles during escapes, chases, and undercover missions.

Many of these vehicles were sleek gadgets built for espionage, with others being rentals, stolen rides, or whatever got him out alive. While the DB5 became the icon, Bond’s garage is far more varied than many fans remember. These are some of the best times James Bond drove a car that was definitely not an Aston Martin.

IMDb

Dr. No (1962)

Bond’s first major on-screen car was not an Aston at all. Sean Connery drives a blue Sunbeam Alpine during the mountain road chase, making it the first true Bond car in franchise history.

IMDb

From Russia with Love (1963)

Before Aston Martin fully became Bond shorthand, he drove a Bentley Mark IV. It matched Ian Fleming’s literary Bond and reinforced the spy’s early association with classic British luxury.

IMDb

Thunderball (1965)

In the Bahamas, Bond uses a large Lincoln Continental. It stood out because it was bulkier and less sporty than his usual sleek vehicles, but still fit the film’s stylish travel-heavy setting.

IMDb

You Only Live Twice (1967)

Bond’s Japanese mission included one of the franchise’s coolest non-Astons. The Toyota 2000GT became a standout symbol of stylish 1960s engineering during the film’s Tokyo-set action.

IMDb

Diamonds Are Forever (1971)

During a memorable Las Vegas chase, Bond drives a Ford Mustang Mach 1 through narrow streets and famously squeezes through an alley on two wheels. It became one of the film’s signature stunts.

IMDb

Live and Let Die (1973)

Roger Moore’s first Bond outing gave him a Chevrolet Impala Convertible. It lacked gadget glamour, but fit the grounded travel and espionage tone of the early investigation.

IMDb

The Man with the Golden Gun (1974)

Bond steals an AMC Hornet during a Bangkok pursuit. The car is best remembered for the famous corkscrew jump, one of the franchise’s most recognizable practical driving stunts.

IMDb

The Spy Who Loved Me (1977)

Possibly the most famous non-Aston Bond car, the Lotus Esprit transformed into a submarine. It was absurd, stylish, and instantly became one of the franchise’s defining vehicles.

IMDb

For Your Eyes Only (1981)

Bond escaping danger in a tiny Citroën 2CV felt intentionally unconventional. The humble French car became unforgettable because of how wildly different it was from his usual high-performance rides.

IMDb

Octopuss (1983)

Roger Moore’s Bond gets behind the wheel of an Alfa Romeo GTV6, giving the film a stylish European sports-car moment that broke from the British-first identity.

IMDb

The Living Daylights (1987)

Though the film includes an Aston Martin V8, Bond also drives an Audi 200 Quattro. It showed the colder, more grounded Timothy Dalton era leaning into practical espionage vehicles.

IMDb

GoldenEye (1995)

Pierce Brosnan’s Bond drives a Ferrari F355 in the film’s opening sequence. It helped define his smoother, more luxury-focused era before BMW became more strongly tied to his version.

IMDb

Tomorrow Never Dies (1997)

This remote-controlled BMW 750iL became one of Bond’s most gadget-heavy cars. The parking-garage escape remains one of the most inventive driving sequences in the series.

IMDb

The World Is Not Enough (1999)

Bond’s BMW Z8 had sleek design and missile-equipped flair. Though its screen time was short, it remains one of the most remembered cars of Brosnan’s run.

IMDb

Casino Royale (2006)

Daniel Craig’s Bond briefly driving a Ford Mondeo was unusually ordinary by Bond standards. That contrast fit Casino Royale’s grounded reboot, emphasizing a rougher and more practical 007.