14 Lengthy Films Your Grandfather Probably Couldn’t Sit Through

After editing, most movies end up with a similar run time, which is to be expected. After all, we as audience members can’t be expected to pay a ticket for a five minute movie, or to sit through an eight hour epic without breaks. Yet, some movies do end up on the lengthy side of the spectrum, and not everyone can stay hooked for that long.

Among the most challenged to sit through such ordeals, are the elderly. Not because they can’t understand the film, but because they need more frequent breaks than most of us; age takes its toll, after all. These films aren’t bad by any means, but they are better seen from the comfort of home, rather than at the cinema.

IMDb

The Brutalist

Brady Corbet’s The Brutalist immediately became known for its massive runtime, complete with an actual intermission during some screenings. At well over three hours long, it practically dares audiences to prove their attention span still exists.

IMDb

Killers of the Flower Moon

Martin Scorsese’s Killers of the Flower Moon runs well past the three-hour mark while telling a slow-burning historical crime story. Even many fans admitted they needed strategic snack planning before sitting through the entire experience.

IMDb

Oppenheimer

Christopher Nolan’s Oppenheimer packed physics, politics, hearings, and existential dread into a three-hour biographical epic. Despite massive success, some viewers joked they needed a college lecture schedule just to mentally prepare for the runtime.

IMDb

The Irishman

Clocking in at over three and a half hours, The Irishman became one of Netflix’s biggest “I’ll finish it later” movies. The de-aging technology discussions almost competed with conversations about how long the film actually felt.

IMDb

Avatar: The Way of Water

James Cameron’s sequel spends enormous amounts of time exploring Pandora’s oceans and visual spectacle. Even audiences impressed by the effects often joked they felt like they physically aged alongside the characters during the marathon runtime.

IMDb

Zack Snyder’s Justice League

At four hours long, Zack Snyder’s version of Justice League feels less like a movie and more like an entire television miniseries glued together. Fans celebrated it, while others wondered whether bathroom breaks counted as intermissions.

IMDb

Lawrence of Arabia

David Lean’s desert epic remains legendary not only for its scale but also for its intimidating runtime. Watching it in one sitting still feels like a cinematic endurance challenge, especially for modern audiences raised on shorter entertainment.

IMDb

Ben-Hur

The 1959 version of Ben-Hur runs for well over three hours and includes an overture and intermission. It remains one of the classic examples of Hollywood epics that truly committed to exhausting viewers through sheer scale.

IMDb

Gone with the Wind

Despite being one of Hollywood’s most famous classics, Gone with the Wind is famously enormous in length. Between romance, war, reconstruction, and melodrama, the movie practically becomes a full-day historical event.

IMDb

Once Upon a Time in America

Sergio Leone’s crime epic stretches close to four hours in its longest version, unfolding slowly across decades of betrayal and regret. Its deliberate pacing makes it critically respected but undeniably demanding for casual movie nights.

IMDb

The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King (Extended Edition)

The theatrical cut already pushed audiences past three hours, but the extended edition goes even further. By the multiple endings, even devoted fantasy fans sometimes start mentally preparing for retirement before the credits finally arrive.

IMDb

Babylon

Damien Chazelle’s Babylon runs over three hours while throwing nonstop chaos, excess, and Hollywood decadence at viewers. The movie’s exhausting energy became part of the experience, especially during its loud and relentless party sequences.

IMDb

King Kong (2005)

Peter Jackson’s remake spends so much time building toward Skull Island that audiences sometimes joke the movie contains three separate films stitched together. Once the dinosaurs appear, viewers are already deep into a marathon-length commitment.

IMDb

Jeanne Dielman, 23 quai du Commerce, 1080 Bruxelles

Frequently cited as one of the greatest films ever made, Jeanne Dielman also has a reputation for testing patience. Its nearly three-and-a-half-hour runtime focuses heavily on repetitive daily routines and extremely deliberate pacing.

15 Movies People Only Know from the Memes

There’s a reality in our lives that we need to accept: we spend more time on the internet than doing anything else. That means, inevitably, that we spend more time sharing memes about movies than watching them, oftentimes having us sharing pictures of films we will never see.

With the limited time we have on this Earth, that’s fine, since most of these films aren’t worth our time either way. We can thank the brave souls that saw them in theaters for the jokes we share today, and know that, at the end of the day, that’s all they were good for.

IMDb

Morbius

Almost nobody actually watched Morbius, yet the internet transformed it into one of the biggest movie memes in years. Fake quotes like “It’s Morbin’ Time” became more culturally relevant than the film itself ever managed.

IMDb

The Room

Tommy Wiseau’s The Room became infinitely more famous through memes, reaction clips, and internet jokes than through traditional audiences. Even people who never watched the movie probably recognize “You’re tearing me apart, Lisa!” immediately.

IMDb

Birdemic: Shock and Terror

The hilariously bad visual effects in Birdemic turned the movie into meme material long after release. Endless screenshots of badly animated attacking birds spread online far more successfully than the film ever did in theaters.

IMDb

Cats

The 2019 version of Cats became a social media phenomenon almost entirely because audiences could not believe the CGI designs were real. For many people, the memes became the entire viewing experience.

IMDb

Sharknado

The Sharknado movies thrived less because audiences genuinely loved them and more because the absurd concept generated endless internet jokes. Flying sharks became a meme long before most people watched an entire installment.

IMDb

Cool Cat Saves the Kids

Derek Savage’s Cool Cat Saves the Kids became infamous online through reaction videos and internet mockery. The movie’s awkward performances and strange anti-bullying message turned it into meme material far more than an actual family hit.

IMDb

The Happening

M. Night Shyamalan’s thriller became meme gold thanks to awkward dialogue and confused performances. Mark Wahlberg talking to plants or asking “What? No!” spread online far more widely than the movie’s original audience.

IMDb

Madame Web

Even before release, Madame Web became a meme factory through awkward trailers and bizarre line deliveries. Online jokes and reaction images arguably generated more interest than the actual superhero movie itself.

IMDb

The Fanatic

John Travolta’s bizarre performance in The Fanatic quickly spread online through clips and screenshots. Most people familiar with the movie know it because of memes surrounding its awkward dialogue and unintentionally funny scenes.

IMDb

Troll 2

The “They’re eating her!” scene transformed Troll 2 into a permanent internet fixture. The bizarre acting and confusing plot turned the movie into meme history despite most audiences never watching it start to finish.

IMDb

Battlefield Earth

John Travolta’s sci-fi flop became famous online through memes mocking its bizarre costumes, tilted camera angles, and absurd dialogue. The internet kept the movie alive largely as shorthand for catastrophic filmmaking decisions.

IMDb

The Wicker Man (2006)

Nicolas Cage screaming about bees became so widespread online that many people only know The Wicker Man remake through reaction gifs and meme compilations rather than the actual horror movie.

IMDb

Fateful Findings

Neil Breen’s surreal thriller achieved cult meme status thanks to awkward editing, bizarre dialogue, and incomprehensible storytelling. Entire YouTube communities formed around laughing at scenes most viewers would never organically discover themselves.

IMDb

Foodfight!

This animated disaster became notorious online because of its unfinished-looking CGI and chaotic production history. Clips and screenshots circulated for years as examples of how unbelievably broken a movie could look.

IMDb

Jupiter Ascending

The Wachowskis’ ambitious sci-fi epic struggled at the box office, but internet memes kept it alive for years. Eddie Redmayne’s whisper-screaming performance especially became far more famous online than the movie itself.

15 Times a Movie Thought CGI Could Solve Everything 

What we can do nowadays with digital effects is really a thing of wonder, with entire movies planned around actors interacting with impossible things. The problem with these effects is that, more often than not, they don’t land as well as practical effects, particularly when actors have nothing to use as reference.

The problem doesn’t only involve fake spaces, however, since it also has an uncanny effect on certain visuals. Superhero films in particular replace practical costumes with CGI ones, often making actors feel like floating heads on unreal bodies. These are the films that overused CGI the most.

IMDb

The Flash

The Flash became notorious for unfinished-looking CGI during several multiverse and speed-force sequences. Even emotional cameos were overshadowed by the strange digital recreations, leaving audiences distracted by the effects instead of the story itself.

IMDb

Cats

The 2019 adaptation of Cats relied almost entirely on bizarre CGI fur technology to transform actors into human-cat hybrids. Instead of solving the challenge of adapting the musical, the effects became the movie’s biggest source of ridicule.

IMDb

Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull

Fans criticized the fourth Indiana Jones film for replacing much of the franchise’s practical stunt work with excessive CGI. The infamous jungle chase and swinging monkeys especially became shorthand for effects overwhelming storytelling.

IMDb

The Hobbit Trilogy

Peter Jackson’s Hobbit films leaned far more heavily on CGI environments and characters than The Lord of the Rings. Many viewers felt the overuse of digital effects made Middle-earth feel less grounded and immersive.

IMDb

Star Wars: Episode II – Attack of the Clones

George Lucas embraced digital filmmaking so aggressively in Attack of the Clones that entire scenes felt detached from reality. Massive green-screen usage often left actors looking disconnected from their own environments.

IMDb

Green Lantern

Ryan Reynolds’ Green Lantern attempted to build an entire superhero universe through heavy CGI, including a fully digital costume. Instead of looking futuristic, many effects quickly became dated and unintentionally distracting.

IMDb

Justice League

The theatrical version of Justice League became infamous for awkward CGI, especially the digitally altered upper lip used to remove Henry Cavill’s mustache. The visual effects controversy overshadowed much of the actual movie itself.

IMDb

The Mummy Returns

While much of The Mummy Returns worked well as pulpy adventure fun, the fully digital Scorpion King climax became legendary for the wrong reasons. Even audiences in 2001 noticed how unfinished the creature looked.

IMDb

Wonder Woman 1984

Wonder Woman 1984 received criticism for relying too heavily on CGI spectacle during major action scenes, especially the finale involving Maxwell Lord and Cheetah. Many viewers felt the digital effects overwhelmed the stronger character-driven moments from the first film.

IMDb

Black Panther

Despite widespread praise for the film overall, Black Panther received criticism for its rushed CGI during the final battle. The underground train fight especially looked noticeably unfinished compared to the movie’s stronger practical scenes.

IMDb

Spider-Man 3

Sam Raimi’s Spider-Man 3 sometimes buried emotional moments beneath oversized digital spectacle. Sandman’s effects impressed audiences initially, but the climax became overloaded with CGI-heavy chaos involving multiple villains and collapsing environments.

IMDb

Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen

Michael Bay doubled down on giant CGI destruction in Revenge of the Fallen, creating action scenes so visually overwhelming that many viewers struggled to understand what was even happening onscreen during robot fights.

IMDb

Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Men Tell No Tales

The later Pirates sequels increasingly relied on digital effects to escalate action and undead designs. By Dead Men Tell No Tales, many fans missed the practical charm and grounded feel of the original trilogy.

IMDb

The Matrix Reloaded

While revolutionary in some areas, The Matrix Reloaded also pushed CGI so hard that certain sequences aged poorly. The Burly Brawl featuring dozens of Agent Smith copies often looks more like a video game than live action.

IMDb

Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania

Marvel’s Quantumania surrounded its characters with nearly nonstop digital environments and creatures inside the Quantum Realm. Critics and audiences frequently commented that the overwhelming CGI made the movie feel strangely artificial and visually exhausting.

15 Shows With So Many Characters We Can’t Keep Track

A diverse cast is always something good in a show, letting us see different perspectives of the same setting. To have such diversity, the cast needs to involve multiple people, but some shows take this a step too far. Particularly with shows sporting multiple seasons, keeping track of who’s who becomes virtually impossible.

This becomes a problem when you’re not as invested in side characters as you are on the main plot. With a condensed cast, these side characters add flavor, but in the cases discussed here, they feel like they are in the way of the plot. These are the shows that could’ve learned something from the phrase “less is more.”

IMDb

Game of Thrones

By the later seasons, Game of Thrones had so many noble families, allies, enemies, and side characters that many viewers needed online maps just to remember who belonged to which kingdom or why two characters hated each other.

IMDb

Lost

Between flashbacks, flash-forwards, mysterious newcomers, and constantly expanding mythology, Lost became increasingly difficult to track. Entire online communities formed just to organize theories and remember who everyone actually was.

IMDb

Grey’s Anatomy

After running for decades with rotating interns, doctors, surgeons, patients, and love interests, Grey’s Anatomy eventually reached the point where many viewers forgot half the cast had even existed.

IMDb

The Walking Dead

As communities multiplied across the apocalypse, The Walking Dead introduced wave after wave of survivors, villains, and temporary allies. Keeping track of everyone became especially difficult once entire groups started disappearing between seasons.

IMDb

Once Upon a Time

Combining fairy tales, alternate timelines, curses, and multiple versions of the same characters made Once Upon a Time increasingly overwhelming. By later seasons, viewers practically needed genealogy charts to follow the relationships.

IMDb

Heroes

The first season of Heroes balanced its large ensemble surprisingly well, but later seasons kept introducing more superpowered characters and storylines until many viewers struggled remembering who half the cast even was anymore.

IMDb

The Wire

Praised for realism and complexity, The Wire constantly shifted focus between police, politicians, dock workers, teachers, journalists, and drug crews. The giant cast helped build Baltimore’s world but could overwhelm first-time viewers.

IMDb

Westworld

Westworld already demanded close attention because of its timelines and mysteries, but the enormous rotating cast of hosts, humans, and duplicates made the story even harder to follow as the series continued.

IMDb

The Vampire Diaries

Between vampires, witches, doppelgängers, hybrids, and supernatural family trees, The Vampire Diaries kept introducing new faces and ancient bloodlines until many viewers gave up trying to remember everyone’s connection.

IMDb

Yellowstone

The Yellowstone universe constantly expands through ranch hands, rival families, politicians, businessmen, and spin-offs introducing even more relatives. Keeping track of the Dutton family tree alone sometimes feels harder than following the actual plot.

IMDb

Boardwalk Empire

HBO’s gangster drama featured politicians, bootleggers, mob bosses, federal agents, and historical figures spread across multiple cities. The massive cast added authenticity, though viewers often needed refreshers on who was betraying whom.

IMDb

The 100

What began as a relatively simple survival series gradually introduced dozens of factions, commanders, clans, artificial intelligences, and space survivors. By the final seasons, many viewers struggled to remember which group everyone was fighting for anymore.

IMDb

The Expanse

With multiple factions spread across Earth, Mars, and the Belt, The Expanse introduced politicians, soldiers, rebels, and scientists at a relentless pace. The detailed world-building rewarded attention but punished casual viewing.

IMDb

True Blood

By later seasons, True Blood had accumulated vampires, werewolves, fairies, shapeshifters, witches, and countless supporting characters. The supernatural chaos eventually became so crowded that major characters sometimes vanished for long stretches unnoticed.

IMDb

Downton Abbey

Between the Crawley family, servants, romantic partners, visiting aristocrats, and changing staff members, Downton Abbey quietly built a surprisingly huge cast. Casual viewers could easily lose track of who belonged upstairs or downstairs.

15 Television Couples That Are Actually Super Messed Up in Retrospect

What fictional characters go through is, as expected, far removed from what happens in reality. This is due to a show needing drama, stakes and a continued source of conflict in order to last many seasons, and oddly enough, it works. Until you give the show a rewatch.

Now, viewing these couples again, we start to have second thoughts. In some cases, we overlooked obvious power imbalances involving teachers, bosses, or massive age gaps. Other couples simply spent years emotionally destroying each other while the show insisted they were meant to be together. These are the TV couples that we don’t think work anymore.

IMDb

Buffy the Vampire Slayer, Buffy and Angel

At the time, Buffy and Angel were treated like an epic supernatural romance. In retrospect, the relationship involves a centuries-old vampire emotionally bonding with a high school student, which feels considerably stranger watching it today.

IMDb

Pretty Little Liars, Aria and Ezra

What the show framed as a passionate forbidden romance now reads deeply uncomfortable to many viewers. Ezra was Aria’s English teacher when their relationship began, creating a massive power imbalance the series rarely treated seriously enough.

IMDb

Friends, Ross and Rachel

Ross and Rachel became one of television’s defining couples, but revisiting the relationship reveals nonstop jealousy, manipulation, and exhausting breakups. Their inability to communicate normally somehow fueled an entire decade of sitcom storytelling.

IMDb

How I Met Your Mother, Ted and Robin

The series repeatedly insisted Ted and Robin were destined for each other despite years of evidence suggesting otherwise. By the finale, many viewers felt the relationship ignored both characters’ growth simply to force the original ending.

IMDb

Twin Peaks, Audrey and Agent Cooper

Audrey Horne openly flirted with Agent Cooper throughout Twin Peaks while still a teenager in high school. Although Cooper resisted the relationship, the show still played portions of the dynamic with surprising romantic energy.

IMDb

Gossip Girl, Chuck and Blair

Chuck and Blair became fan favorites despite a relationship filled with manipulation, emotional cruelty, and betrayal. Some storylines involving Chuck’s behavior feel especially uncomfortable in retrospect given how romantically the series framed the couple overall.

IMDb

Riverdale, Archie and Ms. Grundy

The first season of Riverdale treated Archie’s relationship with his teacher Ms. Grundy as scandalous drama rather than predatory abuse. Modern audiences were especially disturbed by how the show initially romanticized the situation.

IMDb

That ’70s Show, Jackie and Kelso

Jackie and Kelso were presented as a chaotic but lovable sitcom couple, yet their relationship constantly involved cheating, manipulation, and emotional immaturity. Rewatching the series makes their nonstop dysfunction much harder to ignore.

IMDb

The Office, Michael and Jan

Michael and Jan’s relationship gradually transformed into one of television’s most uncomfortable romances. Between emotional manipulation, explosive arguments, and total instability, the dynamic often felt more disturbing than comedic during later episodes.

IMDb

Sex and the City, Carrie and Big

Carrie and Big defined much of Sex and the City, but revisiting the relationship highlights years of dishonesty, emotional games, and commitment issues. Many viewers now question why the series treated them as an aspirational romance.

IMDb

Gilmore Girls, Paris and Asher Fleming

Paris dating much older Yale professor Asher Fleming was played surprisingly casually within Gilmore Girls. In retrospect, the relationship’s age gap and academic power imbalance make the storyline far more uncomfortable than the show seemed to realize.

IMDb

Dawson’s Creek, Pacey and Tamara

Pacey’s affair with his adult teacher Tamara was presented as mature and exciting during early episodes. Today, many viewers see the storyline very differently given the obvious legal and ethical problems surrounding the relationship.

IMDb

One Tree Hill, Brooke and Felix

Brooke and Felix were framed as a dramatic teen romance, but Felix’s controlling behavior and repeated manipulation made the relationship deeply unpleasant. Even longtime fans often consider him one of the show’s most disliked love interests.

IMDb

Grey’s Anatomy, Meredith and Derek

Meredith and Derek became one of television’s biggest couples, yet the relationship regularly involved workplace favoritism, emotional manipulation, and poor communication. Derek especially gets viewed much more critically by modern audiences during rewatches.

IMDb

House, House and Cuddy

Fans spent years wanting House and Cuddy together, but the actual relationship quickly became toxic and unstable. The storyline eventually escalated so badly that House literally drove a car through Cuddy’s dining room wall.

Masters of the Universe: How You Find  the Power of Greyskull in 2026

As a child growing up in the ‘80s, Travis Knight felt different from the kids around him. Sensitive and thoughtful, he often wondered where he fit in. That is until he discovered He-Man and the Masters of the Universe. Well, really Prince Adam, the childlike alter-ego of the iconic techno barbarian hero.

Adam’s emotional, vulnerable, and curious approach to heroics spoke to Knight and set him on the path to Cinema Con 2026 in Las Vegas, where he recently shared 25 minutes of the film with a select group of journalists, explaining his deep personal connection to the beloved ‘80s kids cartoon and toy line.

“It was a huge part of my childhood. I distinctly remember when I was first exposed to it, and it was so different, so that was kind of my big introduction to sci-fi, sci-fi, and fantasy.” Knight shared. 

The director experienced the all-encompassing type of love that only kids can really appreciate. “It was kind of weird and psychedelic and strange, and kind of playful. There was an aspect to it that just felt like it shouldn’t exist. Someone took a bunch of ideas, and then spewed it out, and I was delighted by it, so I had the toys, the little mini comics. When the cartoon came out the next year, I loved the cartoon.”

Indeed, the filmmaker can still recall vividly rushing home after school to watch the He-Man and She-Ra Power Hour, as well as the greatest Christmas gift he ever received: the Castle Grayskull play set.

Knight also had some pretty profound thoughts about why we return to these toyetic nostalgic properties again and again. “A funny thing about toys, a child’s play thing is people mock that stuff. Oh, it’s plastic, and it is, but I see with my own kids, I certainly saw it as a kid, which is that toys are essentially vessels for our ideas and our magic. We put a lot of ourselves into it. They become extensions of us in some way and we become extensions of them.” 

It’s not just Knight who has a lifelong connection to He-Men though. Executive producer Jason Blumenthal has been trying to get a live-action Masters of the Universe project off the ground for two whole decades. It’s been an epic quest in its own right, with multiple challenges, scripts and He-Man castings (what might have been, eh Noah Centineo?). At the heart of it, however, remained a belief that if they captured the magic of Masters of the Universe, the audience will show up. Now that belief can finally be tested when Masters of the Universe opens this week.

For Blumenthal, who spoke to Den of Geek on the Masters of the Universe set in England’s relatively new Sky Studios Elstree, it’s all about capturing the imagination and attention of fans of all ages, no matter their knowledge base or how they entered the fandom. 

“I have to care about every one of them,” the exec producer explains. “But who I care about most is [the person] that’s never seen the toy or that’s ever played with them. If they come to the movie and like it, then I know everyone else will.” 

That mentality brings Masters of the Universe a cast of Hollywood icons and upstarts of all ages. There is The Wire and Pacific Rim’s Idris Elba as Man-At-Arms; original He-Man Dolph Lundgren in a super cute cameo; Rome’s James Purefoy as the strict and powerful King Randor; Community’s Alison Brie as the nefarious Evil-Lyn; Firefly’s Morena Baccarin as the enigmatic Sorceress; Riverdale’s Camilla Mendes as heroine Teela; and of course Red White & Royal Blue and Bottoms breakout, Nicholas Galitzine, as He-Man.

It’s a cast of stars who understand the tight acting balance between sincere and winking. And for Galitzine, it all started with getting one scene perfect. You know the one–-kids around the world have been reenacting it as they hold their swords aloft towards their bedroom ceilings for decades to cry: “By the Power of Greyskull. I have the power!””

“Oh shit, that’s the big scene.” Galitzine laughs as he recalls his feelings about taking on the iconic moment. “I was very conflicted in my mind as to whether I wanted to rehearse it or really just feel it on the day, which was actually something that I landed on because, as Travis says, it was emotional for him. It was emotional for me,” he explained. 

“This is someone who’s been put down their entire life and been told by his teachers when he arrived on Earth that he’s crazy, and this moment, this incantation, is just completely empowering him and vindicating his life of struggles. And I didn’t want to have something so prepared in my mind. I wanted it to feel really from my core and my gut.”

And it works. When we watched the transformation sequence at the world premiere, it had this writer and other film critics tearing up and cheering. It feels earned, awesome, and unique. A large part of that comes from both Galitzine’s performance and also the practical nature of the sets, the production, and the incredible Sword of Power itself.

Costume designer Richard Sale explained how you can feel both the old and the new coming through the redesigns of the beloved costumes worn by characters. 

“Our major goal was to try and be true to the original while moving things on a little bit,’ he shared. “That was our starting point. And it’s been fun to not just pay homage to it, but to fill it with detail as well. So looking at those original kinds of Filmation cartoons and the toys, they’re all quite flat. So obviously we have the ability to give things a history and a depth, and a richness of detail, which makes these things a little bit more interesting.”

We got to experience that on set, with real set-worn costumes that were functional, had pockets and pouches galore, and in the case of some very famous characters were also a lot less furry…

“We went through lots of iterations [for Adam]. Is he wearing trousers? Is he wearing armor on top? We did tease Nick at one point, saying that he was going to be wearing the really tight furry pants.” 

It’s not just the heroes that they knew they had to get right though, as one of things that made the famously toy-selling kids show so popular was its roster of hilarious, campy, and often super weird villains—all of whom are brought to life in shockingly accurate and practical fashion.  

“It all goes down to the critical story that we’re trying to tell and then how you tell it, and it is a balance of those things,” Knight shares. “It’s cheekiness, it’s a reference, it’s fun, it’s playful. That, to me, is part of the DNA of Masters of the Universe. It was always that. It was never super serious, and yet we take it very seriously, we do love these characters, we want to have fun with it, but we are telling an emotional story that does have stakes. So it’s trying to find a way to balance those things.”

“These characters are very over the top; they look ridiculous; they do ridiculous things; they have ridiculous names. So a lot of it was trying to find reasons for those things, which you’ll see when you watch the movie,” Knight explains.

“[We’re just] trying to honor those characters in a way that felt like the Masters of the Universe that we loved as kids, but that also made sense in this world, so we made adjustments along the way. Still, Triclops feels like Triclops,Trap Jaw feels like Trap Jaw, Skeletor feels like Skeletor. It’s our own version of it within this kind of modernized cinematic take on the material.” 

The filmmakers’ attention to detail expands even into the structure of the story. Knight teases that the impetus for the plot mirrors the rhythm of a typical He-Man episode.

“If you watch the Filmation cartoon, you know that every episode, Skeletor had some grand designs for power. He was going to do some kind of scheme. He’s going to get his ass kicked, and then he’s going to promise to return next week. Lather, rinse, repeat, the same thing every time. And we wondered what would happen if he actually won. And that’s essentially how we start our movie,” Knight explained at CinemaCon. 

The director also has words of reassurance to fans concerned by trailers seeming to depict as much time on Earth as Eternia. 

Says Knight, “Very little time is actually spent on Earth. It’s an important grounding mechanism for us, and there’s a reason why we did it, which you’ll see when you watch the movie. There’s a lot of virtue that comes out of being able to act, because that is part of his ancestry, and it allowed us to do certain things that pay off down the road, but in terms of like percentages? [Maybe] 15 percent of the movie takes place on Earth.”

That belief in the inherent weirdness and magic of Eternia sings throughout the big swing blockbuster, making it one of the most adventurous rides of the summer.

Masters of the Universe opens Friday, June 4.

Anne Hathaway and Ewan McGregor Fight Dinosaurs in a Movie That ISN’T Jurassic Park

In the latest trailer for an upcoming summer blockbuster, swelling music sets a fantastical scene. Regular people find themselves whisked out of their regular lives, on an adventure they never imagined. In a striking shot, we see their awe-filled faces as they look in wonder and terror at dinosaurs, somehow brought back to modern times. Ewan McGregor, my dear Anne Hathaway… Welcome to suburbia?

As much as Jurassic Park has become synonymous with dinosaur movies, thunder lizards aren’t actually intellectual IP owned by Universal and Amblin. In fact, not only can anyone make a dinosaur movie, but you can do anything you want with the creatures. That’s what writer/director David Robert Mitchell is doing with The End of Oak Street, a sci-fi adventure starring McGregor and Hathaway as suburbanites who find their neighborhood sent back to prehistoric times.

Of course, the trailer situates the movie in the past even before the first T-Rex makes an appearance. Set to a slowed down version of the Billy Joel track “My Life” (aka, the theme for the sitcom about Tom Hanks in drag), the trailer makes The End of Oak Street look like a lost Spielberg movie in which the dad stuck around. The central family has one of those round booths in their kitchen, the camera pans past a stacked cassette tape rack, and a boy wraps himself in blankets marketing the Christopher Reeves Superman movie.

Further, the trailer includes shots that seem to come from ’80s classics like E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial and Poltergeist. In most cases, those homages would feel cloying, even after seeing the name J. J. Abrams in the credits. But the filmography of David Robert Mitchell suggests something more than mere imitation. In It Follows and especially Under the Silver Lake, Mitchell has demonstrated that he’s not interested in just replicating established tropes. Rather, Mitchell explores the reoccurring motifs in popular culture to find the persistent ideas that shape our imaginations.

None of that metatextual playfulness appears in the Oak Street trailer. Instead, the movie seems like it’s playing the story straight, putting a white-bread suburban family into a dinosaur adventure, in which pteranodons fly past power lines and ankylosauruses cut across freshly-mowed lawns.

Which is enough. At this point, the omnipresence of the Jurassic Park franchise is beginning to harm dinosaur movies as a concept. The first movie remains a perfect genre film, and even some of the sequels have their merits. But as Jurassic World Rebirth made very clear, the series is more interested in repeating familiar beats from the Spielberg film than it is playing around with dinosaurs. If feeding them a bunch of suburbanites is how we get new dinosaur movies, then we’re happy for The End of Oak Street to off as many ’80s Americans as needed.

The End of Oak Street arrives August 14, 2026.

After Years of Wild Crossovers, Modern Warfare 4 Wants to Be Taken Seriously Again

After years of Call of Duty leaning into wild crossover skins, pop-culture nods, and increasingly meme-driven cosmetics, developers at Activision and Infinity Ward have finally assured fans that this trend will be no more with the upcoming installment, Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4

The promise to stay “grounded and transparent” arrived in the form of a tweet posted to X on May 28 following the game’s release date confirmation. Seeing that, for years, fans have begged and pleaded for the franchise to move away from sillier skins and collaborations that detract from the serious and gritty aspects of the game, the statement lands as a significant pledge from the developers. 

In their own words, Infinity Ward emphasized just how central that philosophy will be moving forward:

“Every aspect of Modern Warfare 4 is anchored in the game’s narrative,” the developer’s post said. “Every feature, every decision needs to feel authentic to what Modern Warfare is, and that includes cosmetics and collabs. We’re committed to keeping it grounded and transparent, and we want to know what you’d like to see in our game.” 

While it’s clear that fan feedback is finally being taken into account, the pivot is still surprising given how central over-the-top collaborations and skins have become to modern online games. Much of that shift traces back to Fortnite, which popularized the model of constant crossover content, which has since turned the game (and others like it) into a massive marketing machine in favor of expanding in-game lore.   

In the past, Call of Duty could not resist the temptation and saw many out-there but, at the time, happily-accepted collabs like the Skeletor cosmetic, which was part of the Modern Warfare 2 season 6 Operator Pack; or the Snoop Dogg pack available in Call of Duty:Vanguard, Call of Duty: Warzone, and Call of Duty Mobile

Less popular, and seemingly the turning point towards distaste for the crossover content was the Nicki Minaj collaboration in 2023, which broke the dam for complaints about the continual and increasing lack of realism in the games. 

Now that Call of Duty is seemingly ready to leave all that promotional gold behind, fans have taken it upon themselves to hold the franchise accountable as they see this correction through. One user on X even called for fellow players to screenshot the tweet from Infinity Ward, implying such a thing would come in handy when the developers “decide to toss in Lady Gaga, Omni-Man, or some other goofy collaboration into the game.” 

But staying true to their word thus far, the game’s community team stood their ground and told players to “keep the receipts” and confirmed resolutely that there will be “No Lady Gaga. No Omni-Man. No Teletubbies. No Spongebob.” And not to play devil’s advocate, but it would be pretty funny to see Dipsy frolicking across a tactical map. 

Nonetheless, the fans have made a point of wanting the game to stay true to the game’s dark and brutal immersion, and while the franchise has already started to scale back on cosmetics with Black Ops 7, the level of realism and grounded visuals that Activision and Infinity Ward are promising for Modern Warfare 4 will hopefully remain true once post-launch content begins rolling out. 

Beyond cosmetics and collabs, Modern Warfare 4 is shaping up to be a big entry for the franchise, seeing that it’s set to release on not only the usual suspects (PC, PlayStation 5, Xbox Series X|S) but also the Nintendo Switch 2, which marks the franchise’s first release on a Nintendo platform since Call of Duty: Ghosts in 2013. 

The game will include a full campaign, multiplayer, the return of DMZ, and some major multiplayer updates like improved movement, “apex attachments,” and a new bullet trajectory system that will improve consistent gunplay.

Modern Warfare 4 will be available to play on October 23, 2026. 

James Gunn Reveals The Real Reason Superman and Brainiac Have Beef

May 29 marked the comic debut of the formidable DC supervillain Brainiac, and, as always, DC Studios co-head and Superman director James Gunn took the opportunity to geek out a bit on X and share some comic history. 

In his tweet highlighting Brainiac’s first appearance in the 1958 Action Comics #242 issue, Gunn describes the Collector of Worlds as the physical manifestation of when “intelligence loses ALL connection to humanity,” highlighting the core idea that has made Brainiac such a compelling antagonist for so many years. 

This is especially true when the villain is pitted against Superman, who Gunn asserts is “as human as anyone,” making it no surprise to the filmmaker that the two are constantly at odds. But what is it about Supes’ deeply human nature that makes him such a natural foil for Brainiac?

The key is in values. 

Brainiac represents intelligence taken to its extreme, a being who sees knowledge and logic as ends unto themselves. This core take on the character is seemingly one the Man of Tomorrow director is aiming to shoot for in the upcoming sequel film, with Gunn saying on Threads that his Brainiac is the product of having read “almost every Brainiac story” to prepare for the villain’s upcoming debut in Gunn’s DCU. 

Now compare this to Gunn’s Superman who, as we all saw in the Kryptonian’s speech at the end of the 2025 film, views intelligence through the lens of compassion and moral responsibility. Of course, Supes is every bit as capable and intelligent as the foes he faces, but his intrinsic humanity shapes how he uses those gifts. 

This is what makes Brainiac such a compelling foil. Where Brainiac sees empathy as a limitation on pure logic, Superman sees it as the very thing that gives intelligence purpose. Viewed through that lens, it’s easy to see why Gunn says the two “have beef.”

More importantly, Gunn’s comments may offer an early glimpse of what to expect in Man of Tomorrow. Since Brainiac will serve as the big bad, Superman will inevitably have to force Superman to join forces with his arch-nemesis, Lex Luthor to stop him. 

On the surface, introducing Brainiac can easily deliver the spectacle audiences are expecting from the Superman sequel. He commands unimaginable technology, threatens to destroy and conquer entire worlds, and has both the brain and brawn to push even the Man of Steel to his limits. 

But it’s clear that Gunn isn’t appealing solely to action-packed thrills, instead emphasizing core Superman philosophy he’s already established brilliantly. A confrontation between Brainiac and Superman will force Gunn’s version of the hero to defend the very values that defined him in the first film: compassion, empathy, moral responsibility… but from an intellectual perspective, not necessarily a moral or emotional one. 

The natural next step for Gunn is to push these ideas even further by putting Superman’s principles to an even greater test. While Brainiac will certainly challenge the worldview the Son of Krypton embraced in the first film, the hero will also find himself forced into the aforementioned uncomfortable alliance with Luthor, something David Corenswet teased previously when he described it as “saving the world with your sworn enemy” at CinemaCon. 

How the Big Blue Boy Scout will brave his way through these trials is yet to be seen, and while we are all certain that Superman will hold what makes him human close to his heart, one can’t help but worry about what is in store for the hero. 

Man of Steel releases in theaters on July 9, 2027. 

Marcia Lucas: The Unsung Hero of Star Wars and So Much Else

When Marcia Lucas died at the age of 80 last week, she left behind a host of incredible achievements. Most famous among them, her Best Editing Academy Award for 1977’s Star Wars, a vaunted accolade that still doesn’t fully capture the extent of her work on that film. Famously, it was Marcia’s skills that transformed the stuffy and plodding film directed by her then-husband George Lucas into a generational adventure movie.

However, even that addition still fails to capture the breadth of Lucas’s contributions to cinema. Her work in the New Hollywood era continues to influence today’s cinematic landscape.

Born Marcia Griffin, Lucas got her start working for Sandler Film Library in the 1960s where she initially had the job of finding stock footage requested by directors. That job taught Lucas how to think about the way images juxtapose with one another, something she understood so inherently that she quickly rose to the position of assistant editor. From there, she began working under the incredible editor Verna Fields on a documentary about Lyndon Johnson, which led to her moving into feature films.

Fields brought Lucas to help edit Medium Cool, the incredible 1969 political drama directed by Haskell Wexler. The story of a morally-complex cameraman (Robert Forster), Medium Cool blends traditional feature filmmaking with on-the-ground footage shot at the infamous 1968 Democratic National Convention in Chicago. Mixing the two forms, turned the tumultuous real-world images into a compelling cinematic journey.

Lucas met and got engaged to George while working under Fields, which led to her working on 1969’s The Rain People for Francis Ford Coppola‘s first proper New Hollywood movie, after three less-personal genre films, The Rain People stands out for its raw performances from the three leads, played by Shirley Knight, James Caan, and Robert Duvall. Already, Lucas shows an innate understanding of storytelling rhythms in the way she chooses hard cuts in tense scenes between Knight’s dissatisfied housewife and Robert Duvall’s surly cop and chooses to let tender moments between the housewife and Caan’s handicapped football player linger.

Lucas truly came into her own when Fields left George’s second film American Graffiti (1973) to work on What’s Up Doc? (1972), leaving behind footage for Marcia to sort through, alongside the equally esteemed Walter Much. Not only did Marcia succeed in compiling the footage into a generation-defining blockbuster, but she was recognized with a Best Editing Oscar nomination for her efforts.

These projects opened the way for Lucas to become the lead editor on Martin Scorsese‘s 1976 masterpiece, Taxi Driver. The story of a troubled loner who finds meaning through his violent fantasies, Taxi Driver simultaneously asks the audience to understand and be repulsed by protagonist Travis Bickle (Robert De Niro), while also playing with reality and fantasy. Lucas and her co-editors Tom Rolf and Melvin Shapiro, achieved this by employing frantic cuts during tense scenes, letting the camera linger in the aftermath of carnage, and dissolving at key moments to soften Bickle.

Technically impressive as her decisions were, Lucas’s contributions weren’t just matters of math and cutting. She helped shape the story, sometimes emphasizing the human aspects ignored by her male collaborators.

It was her decision to ground the lead characters by using almost the entirety of an improvised scene between Ellen Burstyn and young actor Alfred Lutter in 1974’s Alice Doesn’t Live Here Anymore, a decision that Scorsese supported. She was the one who told George that Obi-Wan Kenobi should die when he and Luke come to the Death Star in Star Wars, establishing the generational tensions that will become the franchise’s key theme. When Raiders of the Lost Ark ended with Indy’s frustrating encounter with bureaucrats, Lucas asked her husband and Steven Spielberg about Marion, adding a timeless romantic beat to the otherwise bummer ending.

Marcia Lucas’ story sensibilities never forgot the human aspect, whether they were on the mean streets of New York or in a galaxy far, far away. She made great movies into masterpieces that stand the test of time.

Backrooms: Why Is Gen Z So Scared of the ’80s?

A cursory glance at this weekend’s box office makes one thing clear: the future of cinema is here. Obsession and Backrooms dominated theaters, two films not just made by Gen Z directors, but also appealing primarily to Gen Z audiences. Without taking anything away from the achievement of Curry Barker’s Obsession, the success of Kane Parsons’s Backrooms raises an even bigger question: why is Gen Z so scared of the ’80s?

A24‘s Backrooms may take place in 1990, but it derives horror from imagery from the 1980s, from its general yellow and beige aesthetic to specific details, such as an anti-apartheid T-shirt that contributes to a key scare. When combined with the killer animatronics of Five Nights at Freddy’s and even the monsters in the generally more comforting Stranger Things, it’s clear that teens and 20-somethings fear the ’80s, a decade that none of them actually experienced.

Behind the Bright Lights and Big Smiles

Ask someone in the core audience for these works about the appeal, and you’ll hear an interesting term: “liminal spaces.” For them, images of a furniture store in Oshkosh, Wisconsin, which initially spawned Backrooms, or of Chuck E. Cheese after hours invokes an ineffable sense of dread. These images display something that the audience shouldn’t be seeing, the transformation of an aggressively playful and welcoming area into something cold and foreboding.

However, most Gen Z kids didn’t even experience these places at their most normal and welcoming. Shopping malls had long since died by mid-2000s, as had all but a few furniture stores like the one in Backrooms. In most cases, today’s 20-somethings and teens would not have gone with their parents to a much smaller furniture store to shop for goods, or perhaps a clean, specialized place like IKEA. Even more likely, they wouldn’t have participated in the shopping process at all, as their parents would have bought the furniture online.

Likewise, while Chuck E. Cheese (and even some Showbiz Pizza Places) still exist, animatronics were used less frequently in the late 2000s and early-2010s before being officially phased out in 2017. And by that point, the Chuck E. Cheese and Showbiz clones that were more common in the ’80s and ’90s had long gone.

So why would these audiences be unnerved by something they know, but never actually experienced? Perhaps it’s precisely because they never experienced it.

Generational Copies

We may find part of the answer in two other movies that appear in Backrooms. Just before he starts actually exploring the Backrooms, furniture salesman Clark (Chiwetel Ejiofor) winds down by watching Santa Claus Conquers the Martians on TV. Later, after he and his therapist Mary (Renate Reinsve) get further entangled in the space, the movie cuts to the home of scientist Phil (Mark Duplass), who is watching The NeverEnding Story with his family.

Released in 1964 and starring a young Pia Zadora, Santa Claus Conquers the Martians was a goofy children’s oddity about a Martian soldier who kidnaps Santa and brings him to Mars, in the hopes that he’ll make Martian children happy again. The NeverEnding Story released in 1984 and immediately became a favorite among ’80s kids, thanks to its fantastic creature effects and to the dreamy title song by Giorgio Moroder and singer Limahl.

The substance of the two movies have very little in common. But they both have become objects of nostalgia, especially for Gen X and Xennials. Santa Claus Conquers the Martians was rediscovered in the late ’80s, when Baby Boomers started showing it to their children. The cheap production and hokey story appealed the the younger generation’s sense of irony, resulting in recreations such as a 1987 punk take on the theme song “Hooray for Santa Claus” by Sloppy Seconds and a 1991 episode of Mystery Science Theater 3000.

Today, those same Gen Xers and Xennials treat The NeverEnding Story like their parents treated Santa Claus Conquers the Martians, not just showing it to their kids (or, in the case of Stranger Things, making the theme song a key plot point in season 3) but comparing modern children’s entertainment to the movie they liked when they were kids.

Linked together by the 1990 setting of Backrooms, those two movies show another side of the memory trap the film explores thematically. In the same way ’80s kids had Santa Claus Conquers the Martians foisted up on them, they will foist The NeverEnding Story upon their children, not so much because of the film’s inherent qualities (which certainly do exist, at least in the case of The NeverEnding Story), but because the parents want to vicariously return to the feelings they once had via their children.

Cultural Backrooms

Backrooms is explicitly about how memories can become grotesque and stultifying. We may meet Clark as a bitter man who resents his wife for divorcing him and resents the fact that he’s a salesman instead of an architect. Mary seems better adjusted, but she too cannot move past memories of her childhood home, signified by the handprint from the driveway that she keeps in her office.

By themselves, there’s nothing wrong with remembering a romantic relationship or one’s childhood. But as Backrooms illustrates, the memories can become unending, inescapable. As the Backrooms themselves remember things it encounters, there becomes nothing outside of the memory. The memories just become more rooms and hallways and false doors, with no real exit.

Worse, the memories become not memories of the thing itself, but memories of the memories. With each memory of a memory, it grows more distorted and strange and grotesque, farther from the actual feeling that initially evoked it.

The liminal spaces that inspired Backrooms are exactly those distorted memories of memories. By the time Gen Z kids saw pictures of shopping malls and Chuck E. Cheese, they weren’t seeing the places where their parents would hang out with friends or go to birthday parties. They saw places that signified the joy felt by previous generations, but felt no joy themselves.

That distancing effect is obvious even in Gen Z pop culture. Gen X and Millennials also had their parents’ culture foisted upon them, in the form of sitcom reruns, Hollywood remakes, and revival series. But as pop culture becomes more homogenous and limited, today’s generation don’t even have the valves of escape offered to their predecessors. They don’t have the ironic distance that allowed Gen Xers who watched The Brady Bunch in syndication to make the snarky 1995 The Brady Bunch Movie. They don’t have Gen Xers completely rejecting The Phantom Menace, allowing Millennials to remake Star Wars in their own image instead of having it passed down to them.

Instead, Gen Z just has copies of copies, distortions of pop culture from the past that is supposed to be fun, and instead feels hollow. Why wouldn’t they be scared of it?

Beyond the Nostalgia Trap

The success of Backrooms and Obsession is particularly notable in contrast to The Mandalorian and Grogu. Instead of accepting a film continuation of a television series that’s a spinoff of a movie series that started in the late ’70s, teens and 20-somethings are going to original movies by new filmmakers, movies that speak to their experiences. Even better, they’re making these movies in a way that translates those experiences for people beyond their generation, making films that will stand the test of time.

Gen Z may have been thrown into a world dominated by nostalgia, but it looks like they’ve found a way out, making some remarkable movies at the same time.

Backrooms is now playing in theaters worldwide.

Scream Star Confirms Fan Suspicions About Iconic Villain’s Fate

This article contains Scream 7 spoilers

It may have made a ton of money at the box office, but the seventh Scream movie was pummeled by critics, and even its Rotten Tomatoes audience score still lingers at around 70%.

One of the main complaints from critics and fans alike about the latest entry in the franchise was that the killer reveal was very weak. Having initially set up the return of Stu Macher (Matthew Lillard) who had apparently died in the original movie, Scream 7 eventually explained his sudden reemergence and taunting appearances as the result of AI videos created by two killers who had teamed up to get their revenge on Sidney Prescott: Jessica Bowden (Anna Camp) a neighbor who had idolized Sydney after reading her autobiography, and a tech-savvy man called Marco (Ethan Embry) who Jessica had met at a mental insitution and who was seemingly just along for the ride.

Anyone who was disappointed by the Jessica and Marco twist and suspected that the real Stu may have originally been part of the film’s ending may find some comfort in the knowledge that it did very nearly happen. During a recent panel at FAN EXPO in Denver (via ScreenRant), Lillard confirmed that he and director Kevin Williamson actually filmed a post-credits scene for Scream 7 that would have revealed Stu Macher was very much alive.

“[I told Kevin Williamson], we spent the entire movie proving that Stu is alive, and then if he doesn’t come out that door people are going to be bummed,” Lillard explained. “So, what we should do, is we should shoot a post-credit sequence where it’s just Stu watching TV somewhere, alive. Yeah, we shot it. I will say, when they showed it [to test audiences], they showed it without credits. So, they go to the end and then they show me in a reflection watching TV, and it didn’t work…So, it didn’t work because they didn’t test it right, but I think it would have been completely [different with the credits].”

Though this post-credits scene was cut from the final version of the movie, Lillard still seems to have a lot of love for the Scream franchise, and the door may yet be open for him to reprise his role as the real Stu Macher in the future. In the meantime, Poker Face showrunners Lilla Zuckerman and Nora Zuckerman are said to be working on a script for Scream 8 with Paramount and Spyglass after the seventh film set a franchise global record debut of $97.2M.

15 ’70s Movies Everyone’s Parents Made Them Watch

If you grew up with parents who loved movies, chances are you were eventually forced to sit down and watch at least one “classic” from the 1970s. Thrillers, epics, musicals, or even sci-fi adventures, these films became essential family viewing for an entire generation.

Parents quoted them endlessly, insisted modern movies could never compare, and treated every rewatch like a major cultural event. Most of these movies hold up to scrutiny, no matter the time that has passed. They became the kinds of films younger audiences watched because their parents refused to let them skip them.

IMDb

Jaws

For countless families, Jaws became mandatory viewing whenever someone claimed modern movies were scarier. Parents loved introducing younger audiences to Spielberg’s shark thriller while proudly reminding everyone how terrifying it was in theaters during 1975.

IMDb

Rocky

Parents who grew up in the late ’70s practically treated Rocky like required life education. Between the underdog story, iconic training montage, and emotional ending, it became one of those movies families insisted “everyone needs to see once.”

IMDb

Star Wars

Long before it became a giant franchise, the original Star Wars was the movie parents eagerly passed down to younger generations. Many kids first watched it because somebody’s dad insisted modern blockbusters “just aren’t the same anymore.”

IMDb

Grease

Whether viewers wanted it or not, Grease became a staple of family movie nights thanks to endlessly replayed songs and nostalgic appeal. Parents who grew up with it often knew nearly every line and lyric by heart.

IMDb

The Godfather

At some point, nearly every movie-loving parent sat their kids down and declared it was finally time to watch The Godfather. Even younger viewers uninterested in mafia dramas usually recognized its iconic scenes beforehand through sheer cultural exposure.

IMDb

Saturday Night Fever

Disco nostalgia alone kept Saturday Night Fever alive in countless households. Parents frequently revisited it to relive the music, dancing, and John Travolta’s breakout performance while explaining how huge disco culture once was.

IMDb

Superman

Richard Donner’s Superman became one of the definitive “you have to watch this” movies for parents raised in the late ’70s. Christopher Reeve’s performance especially remained beloved long after newer superhero movies dominated theaters.

IMDb

Alien

Many parents introduced Alien as proof older science fiction movies could still outperform modern horror. Watching younger viewers react to the chestburster scene became almost a family tradition for longtime fans of Ridley Scott’s classic.

IMDb

National Lampoon’s Animal House

Parents who loved rebellious college comedies often treated Animal House like a rite of passage movie. Its chaotic humor and party scenes became legendary enough that many younger viewers recognized references before seeing the actual film.

IMDb

Apocalypse Now

Some parents insisted Apocalypse Now was more than a war movie and practically assigned it like homework. Between the surreal imagery and famous quotes, the film became a common “serious cinema” recommendation passed between generations.

IMDb

Willy Wonka & the Chocolate Factory

Although technically released in 1971, Willy Wonka & the Chocolate Factory survived for decades through endless rewatches. Parents loved introducing kids to Gene Wilder’s bizarre performance and watching them get unexpectedly disturbed by the tunnel sequence.

IMDb

Close Encounters of the Third Kind

Spielberg’s alien-contact drama became another classic parents regularly revisited to show younger audiences “real” science fiction filmmaking. Its slower pacing often surprised modern viewers raised on louder and faster blockbuster storytelling.

IMDb

Smokey and the Bandit

Fast cars, CB radios, and Burt Reynolds’ effortless charm made Smokey and the Bandit endlessly replayable for many parents. The movie became especially beloved among families who grew up during the height of 1970s car culture.

IMDb

The Deer Hunter

Parents who valued emotionally heavy dramas often pushed The Deer Hunter onto younger viewers as an important Vietnam War film. Its intense tone and infamous Russian roulette scenes made it unforgettable, even for reluctant audiences.

IMDb

Monty Python and the Holy Grail

Many kids discovered absurd British comedy because their parents endlessly quoted Monty Python and the Holy Grail. Entire families eventually memorized scenes involving killer rabbits, coconuts, and the endlessly repeated “Ni!” jokes.

15 Times American Movies Pretended Mexico Was Yellow

You’d be forgiven for not knowing this, but Mexico isn’t covered in yellow tint. This is a myth propagated by popular media, since they insist on using the filter when showing scenes happening within the country. The alleged reason is that it helps inform the audience where a scene is taking place at a given time, but you don’t see the same technique being used when jumping around different USA states.

Another reason is to denote temperature, with a blue filter for cold climates and a yellow one for hot. If that’s the case, we’ve never seen Miami being depicted with yellow, or Toronto with blue. In any case, here are some examples of extreme yellow filter usage.

IMDb

Traffic

Steven Soderbergh’s Traffic became one of the most famous examples of the “Mexico filter.” Scenes set across the border were heavily tinted yellow and dusty, visually separating Mexico from the cooler, ‘cleaner’ American sequences.

IMDb

Breaking Bad

Whenever Breaking Bad shifted to cartel-related scenes in Mexico, the series dramatically increased its yellow and sepia tones. The visual style became so recognizable that viewers started jokingly calling it the unofficial “Mexico filter.”

IMDb

Spectre

The opening Mexico City sequence in Spectre used warm yellow grading that many viewers immediately associated with the long-running Hollywood trope. The contrast stood out even more because the Day of the Dead setting was already visually colorful.

IMDb

Extraction

Netflix’s Extraction leaned heavily into dusty yellow cinematography during its Mexico-set opening scenes. Like many action thrillers before it, the film used color grading to exaggerate heat, danger, and chaos south of the border.

IMDb

Saw X

Although much of Saw X takes place in Mexico City, the movie often applies warm yellow tones associated with the stereotype. Viewers quickly noticed the familiar grading style that Hollywood frequently uses for Mexican locations.

IMDb

Sicario

Denis Villeneuve’s Sicario frequently used desaturated yellows and harsh sunlight during scenes set around the U.S.-Mexico border. The visual approach helped create tension, though many audiences also recognized the familiar “Mexico equals yellow” cinematic shorthand.

IMDb

Man on Fire

Tony Scott’s Man on Fire drenched its Mexico City scenes in intense warm tones and stylized filters. The aggressive color grading matched the film’s frantic editing style while reinforcing Hollywood’s long-running visual stereotype of Mexico.

IMDb

Once Upon a Time in Mexico

Robert Rodriguez intentionally leaned into exaggerated yellow and orange tones throughout Once Upon a Time in Mexico. Unlike some examples, the stylized look partly reflected Rodriguez’s hyper-stylized action aesthetic rather than strict realism.

IMDb

Savages

Oliver Stone’s Savages used heavily sunbaked cinematography during its cartel-related Mexico sequences. The movie amplified dusty yellows and harsh lighting to create an atmosphere of violence and instability tied directly to its borderland setting.

IMDb

Get the Gring

Mel Gibson’s Get the Gring takes place largely inside a Mexican prison and uses warm, dirty yellow grading throughout. The movie visually follows the same established Hollywood shorthand for portraying danger and disorder in Mexico.

IMDb

Desperado

Robert Rodriguez’s Desperado embraced a gritty yellow-tinted look for many of its Mexican settings. The stylized cinematography became influential enough that later action movies copied similar color palettes when depicting Latin American locations.

IMDb

The Counselor

Ridley Scott’s The Counselor used muted yellows and dusty cinematography during cartel-related scenes connected to Mexico. The visual treatment fit neatly into Hollywood’s recurring habit of portraying the country through harsh desert-like color grading.

IMDb

Miss Bala

Both the original Mexican version and the American remake of Miss Bala depict cartel violence, but the 2019 Hollywood adaptation especially leaned into warm yellow tones during many Mexico-based scenes, reinforcing a now very recognizable visual cliché.

IMDb

Clear and Present Danger

Though focused partly on Colombia, Clear and Present Danger also uses warm yellow-tinted cinematography during several Mexico and border-related sequences. The film helped cement the visual language later copied by countless cartel and drug-war thrillers.

IMDb

Narcos: Mexico

Narcos: Mexico frequently used dusty yellow grading throughout cartel scenes. The visual style matched the broader crime-drama trend established by productions like Traffic and later copied across countless border-related thrillers.

The Age of the YouTube Filmmaker Is Here After Backrooms and Obsession’s Triumph

In the winter of 1970, Danny Selznick, the son of storied Hollywood producer David O. Selznick, held a dinner party in his father’s house. Here in an abode paid for by movies like Gone with the Wind and Alfred Hitchcock’s Rebecca, the last vestiges of old Hollywood fine-dined with the first shaggy personalities of New Hollywood. This was crystallized when Dennis Hopper, flush off the success of Easy Rider from a few months earlier, went up to George Cukor and pushed his finger hard in the old man’s chest. 

Taunting the guy who directed everyone from Katharine Hepburn to Audrey Hepburn, and in films that included The Philadelphia Story and My Fair Lady, Hopper drunkenly enthused, “We’re going to bury you. We’re gonna take over. You’re finished.”

For more than a decade, I’ve thought about this anecdote. So have many other critics and cinephiles who’ve mused about how the modern age of the IP franchise movie—sometimes reduced to just “Marvel” or “Star Wars” by cynics—will eventually, and generationally, give way in the same manner that New Hollywood ushered out their parents’ ideas of entertainment: namely musicals and Westerns. While I still am not quite ready to say that paradigm shift is fully here and the golden age of superhero movies and endless sequels, prequels, and “shared universes” is about to abruptly end… it finally seems like that screw is turning in that direction. And this weekend especially crystallized that with one of the most remarkable box office stories I’ve seen in my lifetime.

Backrooms, a new film from Kane Parsons, a 20-year-old YouTube content creator, just opened at number one at the box office with an astounding $81 million across its first three days. Just as impressive, Curry Barker’s Obsession saw its weekend gross go up for the second weekend in a row, grossing $26.4 million in its third weekend after earning $24 million in its second, and what was a surprise $17.2 million in its first. Barker is, for the record, only 26. For a little more context, it’s also gone up by 30 percent each Friday it’s played in wide release. The last wide release to do that outside of the Christmas holiday season was another New Hollywood movie: Jaws, 51 years ago.

Both films are horror, and at least Parsons comes in with a built-in audience due to Backrooms being an expansion on a YouTube series he started several years ago. But even while playing in that “lane,” cumulatively their success seems to be making a huge statement, especially since there is a new Disney Star Wars movie in theaters this weekend, and it dropped 69 percent in its second weekend… below Backrooms and below Obsession in its third weekend. The $750,000-budgeted Obsession also cost literally less than one percent of The Mandalorian and Grogu’s budget.

Neither Parsons nor Barker are the first Gen-Z YouTuber to make the jump to theatrical. Just this past January, Mark Fischbach, known as “Markiplier” to his YouTube subscribers, independently released his $3 million-budgeted Iron Lung to theaters. About a month earlier, he revealed the film’s release would only be in about 60 independent theaters across the U.S. unless his fans could persuade and encourage their local theater chains to screen the film. It opened on more than 3,000 screens and grossed $17.8 million in its first three days, presaging a run that topped $50 million worldwide.

This highly independent grassroots phenomenon is an extreme example of what’s occurring, but it is all the same informative about the shifting tastes and influences of filmmakers, audiences, and an entertainment industry that’s struggling to catch up. Increasingly, the next crop of Gen Z filmmakers appear to be arriving to theaters straight from YouTube and the accompanying interwebs.

Launched over 20 years ago in 2005, YouTube has been around long enough for an entire generation of young adults to not remember a world without it—or for that matter Twitch, Instagram, and soon enough TikTok. This means the next generation of talent has been shaped and educated on the visual language of the internet. Despite this reality, Hollywood has been reluctant to look at content creators as potential feature filmmakers.

Indeed, while enjoying wide releases this month courtesy of Focus Features and A24, respectively, Obsession and Backrooms are still both indies. In fact, Obsession was the classic micro-budgeted horror discovered at a festival—in this case the Toronto International Film Festival—that triggered an overnight bidding war. Now its box office trajectory is in the rarefied company of The Blair Witch Project and the first Paranormal Activity. Even so, it is technically writer-director Barker’s second feature after he released his first film, Milk & Serial, straight to YouTube.

Meanwhile before Obsession and Backrooms, Danny and Michael Philippou might be marked as the pioneering statesmen of YouTube-to-horror darlings at the ripe old age of 33. The Aussie twin wunderkinds went by RackaRacka on their socials until their debut feature Talk to Me blew the roof off Sundance in 2023, leading to a fruitful relationship with A24, which also produced and distributed the pair’s Bring Her Back last year.

Cumulatively, many of the first Gen Z voices to make major headway in the film industry this decade are springing up in horror, much in the same way Millennial mavens like Robert Eggers, Ari Aster, and Jordan Peele rose up in the exact same genre during the 2010s. However, that era still was going through the same established pathways developed in the 1990s: make some shorts, build connections, and premiere at Sundance (even Peele’s studio-backed Get Out launched in Park City to grow word-of-mouth ahead of the Comedy Central star’s hard pivot to genre filmmaking).

While the Philippous and Barker went a similar route, Parsons is coming straight from YouTube to the biggest opening in A24’s history. And even Barker seems a bit ambivalent about the old ways, despite Obsession’s TIFF success. Recently talking to NBC News, Barker said, “We’re finally getting to the point where people are like, ‘OK, fine, I’ll put my film on YouTube.’ Versus when I was in film school, that was kind of like a last resort. People didn’t want to put their stuff on YouTube. They wanted to go the festival route.”

After this month, that could change as studios are finally encouraged to look at YouTube as a potential training ground for new talent, much the same way music videos proved to be something of a farm league for young talent in the 1980s and ‘90s, nurturing future Hollywood staples like David Fincher, Michael Bay, and Spike Jonze. Or, perhaps, as a generational wellspring for an entirely different sensibility. Think Dennis Hopper circa 1970, as well as Robert Altman, Robert Redford, Warren Beatty, Francis Ford Coppola, William Friedkin, Martin Scorsese, Brian De Palma, and, ironically enough, Steven Spielberg and George Lucas.

Then again, one has to wonder if this is itself only a stop-gap between the present and a larger future. Right now, in this generation, getting the distributive support of a prestige indie label like A24 or Focus Features, or a major studio like Universal and other interested parties—such as the unnamed suitor who allegedly made Barker a cool $10 million offer last week for his next original project, no script required—is critical to finding a large and financially lucrative audience who can still be best made aware of a film via traditional marketing and publicity.

But like the previous resistance to YouTubers, that could swiftly evolve in the coming years as more audiences and filmmakers get as comfortable as Barker did on his first film, and just say “screw it,” before uploading straight to the web. Interesting times, nay?

15 Games We Don’t Believe Anyone Actually Played All the Way Through

Games are meant to be entertainment above all else, no matter what your idea of fun is. As such, there are certain video games that, for one reason or another, we don’t believe most people that say they played them, actually did.

On the one hand, you have games known for being bad, broken, or oftentimes ‘unplayable,’ with only the most dedicated of gamers being able to push through them for one reason or another. On the other hand, you have games that are so hard, the level of dedication required to finish them often doesn’t align with having a job or career. These are the games we don’t believe most people finished.

IMDb

Bubsy 3D

Often listed among the worst platformers ever made, Bubsy 3D became infamous for awkward controls, terrible camera angles, and bizarre voice lines. Finishing it feels less like beating a game and more like surviving a punishment challenge.

IMDb

Sekiro: Shadows Die Twice

Yes, people absolutely finished Sekiro, but the game’s brutal bosses and precision-heavy combat convinced countless players they simply were not built for victory. Every win feels earned through equal parts skill, stubbornness, and emotional damage.

IMDb

Superman 64

Between endless fog, broken controls, and infamous ring-flying missions, Superman 64 gained a reputation as one of gaming’s most miserable experiences. Many players rented it out of curiosity and likely gave up before reaching the ending.

YouTube/Bennett Foddy

Getting Over It with Bennett Foddy

Designed specifically to frustrate players, Getting Over It punishes mistakes by sending you crashing backward through hours of progress. The combination of brutal physics and sarcastic narration turned rage-quitting into the entire appeal.

IMDb

Dark Souls

The original Dark Souls became legendary for difficulty so punishing that many players bounced off entirely. Fans love the challenge, but outsiders still look at late-game bosses and wonder whether anyone finished it without losing their sanity.

IMDb

Ride to Hell: Retribution

This biker action game became notorious for broken combat, awkward dialogue, and bizarrely unfinished cutscenes. Critics destroyed it on release, and its reputation became so bad many people joke nobody ever willingly completed the entire thing.

IMDb

Battletoads

The infamous Turbo Tunnel alone probably stopped generations of players from ever seeing the ending. Battletoads mixed fun co-op chaos with difficulty spikes so cruel that finishing it became a badge of honor.

YouTube/NintendoComplete

Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde

This NES game confused players for decades thanks to strange mechanics, punishing enemy placement, and almost incomprehensible progression. Many likely spent more time wondering how it worked than actually making progress toward the ending.

YouTube/Dosgamert

Lion King

Disney’s The Lion King became famous for crushing difficulty, especially the monkey puzzle and platforming sections. Plenty of kids rented it expecting a friendly Disney adventure and instead discovered psychological warfare disguised as a platformer.

IMDb

Cuphead

With nonstop boss fights and unforgiving timing, Cuphead turned old-school animation into a modern endurance test. The beautiful art style attracted huge audiences, but the difficulty probably scared away plenty before the credits rolled.

IMDb

Big Rigs: Over the Road Racing

Big Rigs barely functions as a video game, featuring broken physics, unfinished AI, and races opponents literally cannot win. The game became internet-famous precisely because completing it feels almost meaningless given how incomplete it is.

IMDb

Ghosts ’n Goblins

Not only is Ghosts ’n Goblins brutally difficult, but after finally beating it, the game famously demands players finish the entire thing again for the “real” ending. Countless people probably stopped right there out of pure disbelief.

IMDb

E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial

The Atari adaptation became a gaming legend thanks to confusing gameplay and endless falling into pits. Its reputation grew so disastrous that unsold cartridges were famously buried in a landfill, which somehow feels perfectly appropriate.

YouTube/NintendoComplete

Ninja Gaiden

The NES version of Ninja Gaiden remains notorious for punishing enemy placement and brutal late-game difficulty. Reaching the final levels only to get thrown backward after dying felt specifically designed to destroy players emotionally.

YouTube/Omni World

Fear & Hunger

This indie RPG intentionally embraces cruelty, throwing players into brutal survival mechanics, permanent consequences, and horrifying encounters. Its reputation for relentless punishment makes many curious players wonder whether anyone finishes it without consulting guides or completely breaking down.

13 of the Biggest Stars Who Are Also Into Scientology

Scientology has maintained ties to Hollywood for decades, partly through its aggressive celebrity outreach and dedicated Celebrity Centre in Los Angeles. Over the years, a surprising number of actors, musicians, and television stars have been publicly linked to the organization, sometimes openly defending it and other times trying to keep the connection quiet.

Many of these celebrities remained among its most visible supporters for years. Because of the controversy surrounding the church, celebrity involvement often attracts intense public attention whenever it resurfaces. These stars became some of the most recognizable names associated with Scientology, but you might not know of their involvement until now.

IMDb

Tom Cruise

No celebrity is more closely associated with Scientology than Tom Cruise. He joined in the 1980s and became one of the organization’s most visible supporters, frequently discussing its impact on his life and career.

IMDb

John Travolta

John Travolta has publicly supported Scientology for decades and often credited it with helping him through personal tragedies. His longtime connection to the church made him one of its most recognizable Hollywood members.

IMDb

Elisabeth Moss

Despite starring in The Handmaid’s Tale, Elisabeth Moss has remained linked to Scientology throughout her career. Raised within the church, she has occasionally addressed the topic while largely keeping her personal beliefs private.

IMDb

Nancy Cartwright

Best known as the voice of Bart Simpson, Nancy Cartwright has been a longtime Scientologist and reportedly donated heavily to church-related causes over the years. Many fans remain surprised by her involvement because of her animation career.

IMDb

Jenna Elfman

Jenna Elfman has openly discussed Scientology in interviews and remained one of the organization’s more public celebrity supporters. The Dharma & Greg star has defended the church multiple times throughout her television career.

IMDb

Giovanni Ribisi

Character actor Giovanni Ribisi has long been associated with Scientology and frequently appears on lists of active celebrity members. Despite a lower public profile than Cruise or Travolta, his involvement has been well documented for years.

IMDb

Michael Peña

Michael Peña has spoken positively about Scientology in interviews, even crediting it with helping his acting career and personal outlook. His involvement often surprises audiences familiar with him mainly through blockbuster action and superhero films.

IMDb

Kirstie Alley

Before her death, Kirstie Alley was one of Scientology’s most outspoken celebrity defenders. The Cheers actress regularly discussed her faith publicly and remained closely associated with the organization for decades.

IMDb

Danny Masterson

Danny Masterson was one of Scientology’s highest-profile younger celebrity members during the height of That ’70s Show. His later criminal conviction brought renewed scrutiny to both him and the church’s celebrity culture.

IMDb

Juliette Lewis

Oscar-nominated actress Juliette Lewis publicly defended Scientology for years and spoke positively about its anti-drug messaging. Her involvement became widely known during the 1990s and 2000s alongside other celebrity members.

IMDb

Isaac Hayes

Legendary musician Isaac Hayes was a Scientologist for many years and famously left South Park after the show mocked Scientology beliefs. His departure became one of the organization’s biggest entertainment-related controversies.

IMDb

Erika Christensen

Erika Christensen has openly acknowledged being raised in Scientology and has defended her experiences within the church during interviews. Many viewers mainly know her from Parenthood and other mainstream television dramas.

IMDb

Jason Dohring

Known for Veronica Mars, Jason Dohring comes from a Scientology-connected family and has long been identified as part of the church. His association became more widely discussed as interest in Scientology celebrity members grew online.

15 Actors You Didn’t Know Weren’t American

Acting is the art of portraying something you’re not, at least most of the time. While that often means the character’s profession or family history, it can also translate to nationality, something most audiences overlook when enjoying their films.

And it makes sense that they overlook it, particularly on the Hollywood scene, since most actors that appear on screen are American. But you’d be surprised at how many of them are from (or were raised in) different countries with their own accents, making these performers even more outstanding when you think about it.

IMDb

Tom Holland

Despite becoming closely associated with Spider-Man and other American characters, Tom Holland is actually English. His natural American accent in the Marvel films surprised many viewers who first discovered him through the MCU.

IMDb

Christian Bale

Christian Bale has played Americans so convincingly for decades that many audiences forget he was born in Wales and raised partly in England. His performances in films like American Psycho and The Dark Knight helped hide his real accent completely.

IMDb

Hugh Laurie

Before House, many American viewers had no idea Hugh Laurie was British. His convincing accent as Dr. Gregory House impressed producers so much that director Bryan Singer reportedly assumed Laurie was actually American during auditions.

IMDb

Andrew Garfield

Andrew Garfield was born in Los Angeles but raised in England, and most audiences primarily identify him as British. His American performances in films like The Social Network and The Amazing Spider-Man rarely reveal his natural accent.

IMDb

Idris Elba

Idris Elba’s roles in The Wire and other American productions fooled countless viewers into believing he was American. His Baltimore accent as Stringer Bell became especially praised for sounding authentic throughout the acclaimed HBO series.

IMDb

Margot Robbie

Margot Robbie’s performances in The Wolf of Wall Street and Barbie helped many viewers overlook that she is Australian. Her ability to shift accents easily became one of the reasons Hollywood embraced her so quickly.

IMDb

Henry Cavill

Henry Cavill is strongly associated with Superman, one of America’s most iconic fictional heroes, but the actor himself is English. His polished American accent in multiple action roles often surprises audiences hearing his real voice for the first time.

IMDb

Millie Bobby Brown

Because of Stranger Things, many viewers assumed Millie Bobby Brown was American for years. In reality, the actress was born in Spain and raised partly in England before adopting an American accent for her breakout Netflix role.

IMDb

Charlie Hunnam

Charlie Hunnam’s role as Jax Teller in Sons of Anarchy convinced many viewers he was American. The English actor spent years maintaining a rugged California biker accent that became closely tied to the series’ identity.

IMDb

Damian Lewis

Damian Lewis became famous in America through Band of Brothers, Homeland, and Billions, often playing distinctly American characters. His natural English accent still catches some longtime fans off guard during interviews.

IMDb

Matthew Rhys

Welsh actor Matthew Rhys became widely recognized for playing an undercover Soviet spy posing as an American in The Americans. Ironically, many viewers were shocked to learn Rhys himself was not American either.

IMDb

Melanie Lynskey

Melanie Lynskey frequently plays American characters in both television and film, especially in Yellowjackets and The Last of Us. Her real New Zealand accent is much softer and very different from her onscreen performances.

IMDb

Freddie Highmore

Freddie Highmore spent years starring in The Good Doctor using a convincing American accent, leading many viewers to assume he was from the United States. In reality, the actor was born and raised in London.

IMDb

Rose McIver

New Zealand actress Rose McIver built much of her television career playing Americans in shows like iZombie and Ghosts. Her natural accent surprises viewers who only know her from American network television.

IMDb

Daniel Kaluuya

Daniel Kaluuya’s breakout role in Get Out featured such a natural American accent that many audiences were stunned hearing his London voice during interviews and awards speeches afterward.

Spider-Man: Brand New Day’s Romantic Triangle Can Fix a Hated Comic Storyline

Although not a one-to-one adaptation, Spider-Man: No Way Home borrowed several elements from the 2007 Marvel Comics storyline One More Day. In both stories, Peter seeks help from a magic-user in the hopes that it will improve the lives of his loved ones, even if it means that he loses his connection to them. Almost two decades later, One More Day remains one of Marvel’s most hated storylines. Now the newest Spider-Man movie Brand New Day might be adapting one of that’s story’s follow-ups, a tale somehow even more hated than One More Day.

After having Doctor Strange wipe away all memories of his existence, Peter has to face the fact that not only has MJ moved on, but that she doesn’t even know he she is. “As someone who cares about the characters and cares about these films, it’s like, ‘Oh my God, it’s so heartbreaking,'” MJ’s actor Zendaya told Empire. “You just feel so bad because you want them to be happy, and you know ultimately they would be happier together.” Fans are sure to agree if Brand New Day brings in the most hated character in recent Marvel comics, a man so devious, so terrifying, he can only be called “Paul.”

For those who have not visited a Spider-Man-themed Reddit in the past two years, Paul is “Paul Rabin,” first introduced in 2022’s Amazing Spider-Man #1, by Zeb Wells and John Romita Jr. That issue begins after a time jump and establishes that things have gone very bad for Peter in the months past: the Fantastic Four is mad at him, his regular pals are mad at him, even Aunt May is mad at him. But worst of all, Mary Jane is married and has two kids. And to top it all off, her husband is some dork with hipster glasses, an insufficient beard, and sometimes a ponytail, and also his name is Paul!

Needless to say, readers did not like Paul. Part of it, yes, is Paul’s fault. Not because of anything he’s done really, but because of what he doesn’t do. And what he doesn’t do is anything interesting. Paul’s a walking stuffed shirt, a guy who exists to be a complication in Peter’s life. And not even multiversal shenanigans that revealed his father was a magical warlord called the Emissary or that he and MJ’s kids never existed could make him interesting. So when Paul got stabbed to death by the oh-so-edgy serial killer Torment in last month’s Venom #256, by Al Ewing and Carlos Gómez, the internet threw a party.

The real problem with Paul is that he was with Mary Jane and Peter wasn’t. Ever since One More Day erased Peter and MJ’s marriage, fans have rejected every other love interest and almost every plot point the two characters have experienced.

Marvel’s refusal to reunite Peter and MJ has been bad for the comics, and it’s bad news for Brand New Day. That’s because the cast features Ahsoka star Eman Esfandi as MJ’s new love interest, who doesn’t have a name yet, but he sure looks like he could be a Paul. If Brand New Day plays it right, this new guy will just be a bump on the road to Spidey’s reunion with the woman he loves. But if it decides to keep MJ away from Peter for too long, then the internet will come for Brand New Day with a level of fury it usually reserves for people named Paul.

Spider-Man: Brand New Day swings into theaters on July 31, 2026.

Backrooms Is the First Horror Movie of the AI Era

This article contains spoilers for Backrooms.

Early in the new A24 horror film Backrooms, furniture salesman Clark (Chiwetel Ejiofor) stops his exploration of the space attached to the basement of his store because he thinks he hears a monster coming toward him. Clark desperately crawls up an incline on one side of the room, to a tiny brown door adorned with three door knobs. To his dismay, Clark discovers that two of the knobs do nothing, and only one opens the door, finally allowing him to crawl through.

Clark needn’t have run from the noise, and not just because—as we eventually learn—the thing pursuing him isn’t what he expected. Rather, his running is unnecessary because Backrooms isn’t about a beastie come to kill and maim. Instead, director Kane Parsons builds a dread through uncanny images, visions of spaces filled with things that should be normal, but are a little bit off: fluorescent lights and cork board on an office wall instead of the ceiling, hallways that jut from the wrong part of the room, a face with three sets of eyes and three noses.

The terror comes, in part, from the way the banal becomes strange and unfamiliar. But it also comes from showing a world without the human, especially as Clark and his therapist Mary (Renate Reinsve) strive to retain their sense of selves. This tension between the strange and the human makes Backrooms one of the clearest looks at the fundamental horror of AI.

Inhuman Horror

Like most theatrical screenings in the U.S., my 5:45 p.m. showing of Backrooms actually began with commercials. Alongside odes to Mountain Dew and new cars, my theater played an ad for a local insulation company, in which a woman jumps up from her couch and begins yelling at the audience about energy efficiency. Where the other commercials one must sit through before the movie stars merely annoy, this one unnerves, and with good reason. It’s AI.

The woman’s eyes are a little too wide, her movements a bit too smooth, the sounds she makes crackle in the wrong places. As much as the woman extolls the importance of staying cool in the summer and warm in the winter, we viewers know that those comforts mean nothing to her because she can’t feel anything at all.

Up until that point, the insulation company commercial was the scariest depiction of artificial intelligence to hit the screen, but it was hardly the only one. Culture has long worried about melding humanity with machine, going back to Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein or Karel Čapek’s 1920 play R.U.R., which coined the term “robot.” Horror films from ranging from Demon Seed and Death Spa to The Terminator and M3GAN have warned that machines will destroy us if they gain sentience.

Yet, now that AI exists and is being pushed every time you do an internet search and every time you try to use your phone, we can see that none of these films got it right. The threat of AI isn’t that robots will come to life and kill us because we didn’t say thank you when our refrigerators dispensed ice. The threat comes from companies burning water and other resources to house data farms, from the local jurisdictions that give them tax breaks to do it. The threat comes from CEOs who lay off workers only to use machines to scrape the internet to steal their work.

AI is scary because it’s humans dehumanizing humans, and that’s what Backrooms captures.

Lost in the Uncanny Valley

Outside of Backrooms‘s cold open, the first sign that something’s amiss comes when Clark and a maintenance man check out the building’s electrical box. Opening the door, they find the usual set of switches than one expect, in two orderly columns at the center of the box. But then they notice three random switches, placed diagonally at the bottom. Switches, obviously, belong on an electrical box. But, not in that place, and not in that shape and color.

As Clark explores further into the backrooms, he finds more of the same. Each of the rooms have hallways, but the hallways lead to more hallways and the rooms serve no purpose. Couches appear would no one would place them, let alone sit in them. Windows let in no light and let no one look through.

To his credit, Parsons doesn’t offer an explanation for how or why the space works. Even the scientist (Mark Duplass) who rescues Mary at the end has no real insight into the space’s function. Instead, we just know that the space remembers things, and as it returns to each memory, it gets something wrong. It hyper-fixates on a specific detail while overlooking the generalities. So we see a room with chairs, but the chairs are scattered in front of the door or stacked up one another. We see a bathroom with a line of sinks in the middle and a tub sunk into the floor.

The horrors climax with four people: a small man fused to his wheelchair who can only turn on a light, a large man with cascading eyes and noses, a woman with a shuddering effect on her face, and lumbering, giant recreation of Clark in his pirate costume.

These images bring to mind the images that have littered the internet since techies started really pushing generative AI as a creative tool, bodies that blend together as they move past each other and arms jutting out of nowhere, topped by hands with too many fingers. Or, more befitting the “copy of a copy” language of Backrooms, they recall the game where users ask ChatGPT to replicate an image, each result growing more grotesque.

As that last example underscores, most people have been making ChatGPT replicas as a type of a game. But the terror invoked by the uncanny in Backrooms shows that there’s nothing funny about it at all. AI has no concept of the human, and thus its attempts to replicate life only make a mockery of humanity, twisting and reflecting in ways that feel all the more monstrous because of how normal it wants to be. When we look at an AI image, whether Owen Wilson staring dead-eyed in a simulacrum of Wes Anderson directing Star Wars or a fake pitch woman selling home improvement services, we feel ourselves slightly diminished, and it’s terrifying.

Moving Forward, Better

Of course, nothing in the text of Backrooms is about AI. Instead, the movie is explicitly about holding to memories and refusing to evolve. In perhaps the most heartbreaking moment of the film, Clark submits to the nightmare of conformity that he’s confused for safety, declaring to Mary, “I don’t want to change.”

Such declarations might sound like a rejoinder to those who doubt Generative AI. Not wanting change is bad, the movie seems to be saying, so I should stop being afraid of this new technology. But Clark only wants to stay the same because he thinks it’s safe, because maturing and moving on requires him to do things differently.

Maturing, growing, changing: these are all human attributes. If we don’t embrace those attributes, we might initially accept the false depictions offered by Generative AI. But once we look closer and see how distorted and grotesque it makes the world, then we have to run from it. Not because there’s a monster lurking, and certainly not because we’re afraid of technology, but because it takes away our humanity.

Backrooms is now playing in theaters worldwide.

House of the Dragon Season 3 Trailer Reminds Us That Ruling Is Harder Than Fighting

In the very first shot of the latest trailer for House of the Dragon season 3, the camera pans over a field of dead bodies, ending with Daemon (Matt Smith) battering some schmuck in the mud. We’re then treated to images of people being stabbed, squished, and torched alive by dragons. Yep, this is a Game of Thrones show alright.

House of the Dragon continues the HBO franchise’s central theme, one straight from the George R. R. Martin books: the fight to rule tends to decimate those who would be ruled. But with its focus on best-friends turned rivals Rhaenyra Targaryen (Emma D’Arcy) and Alicent Hightower (Olivia Cooke), the show reminds us that things aren’t so great for the rulers either. As Alicent puts it in the trailer, “The crown is a weight that crushes.”

Apparently, that crushing came as a surprise to Rhaenyra, who is seen in the trailer finally laying claim to King’s Landing and fully asserting herself as the ruler of Westeros. Over images of her forces moving in and tearing down the green flags of the Hightowers, Rhaenyra declares that she will secure the city “without further bloodshed.” And how does she plan to do that? By threatening bloodshed for those who oppose her. Or, more accurately, by threatening to torch the opposition with dragons.

For Rhaenyra, that opposition stems entirely from her challenger to the throne, Aegon II (Tom Glynn-Carney), son of her father Viserys (Paddy Considine) and Alicent. Aegon has proven hard to kill, having survived even near-immolation from a dragon, but Rhaenyra remains convinced that if she can just get him out of the way, then the people will unite around her. She seems unaware of the building resentment among the people, particularly as she establishes her rule in King’s Landing, or the machinations of Aegon’s insane brother Aemond (Ewan Mitchell), who still rides the Queen of All Dragons, Vhagar.

As the trailer shows, Rhaenyra’s belief in a simple path to ruling is just as much hope as it is ignorance. On some level, she does want peace. Moreover, she believes in her family’s vision that humanity can only survive some great future threat (which we know as the White Walkers) if they’re united under her rule. She simply cannot see how anything good can come from putting Aegon on the throne.

That idealism and simplicity of vision brings Rhaenyra in line with her father, who may have been a decent man, but was a terrible ruler, whose personal shortcomings compounded suffering for the kingdom and for himself, as demonstrated by the way he rotted in his final years. Things are no easier for Aegon or Alicent, who can make the hard decisions without self-delusion, but forgo any sense of happiness in the meantime.

Whether its ideals or happiness, the crown crushes it all. Well, it metaphorically crushes them. Everyone else in Westeros gets crushed by dragons or swords or horses while the rulers sort it out. That’s how it was in Game of Thrones and that’s how it is in House of the Dragon.

House of the Dragon season 3 premieres on HBO on June 21, 2026.

A24’s Friday the 13th Series Must Not Try to Fix the Timeline

It should be the easiest question in the world to answer. When does Friday the 13th take place? On Friday. The thirteenth day of the month. It’s right there in the title. But the Friday the 13th franchise can’t do anything the easy way, so if you thought that a series that took two and a half movies to establish its iconic killer would keep things simple, you thought wrong.

The latest Friday the 13th entry, the A24-produced television series Crystal Lake on Peacock, is a prequel, and prequels always want to straighten things out, providing explanations for things that don’t make sense. But if Crystal Lake “fixes” the timeline, it will take away the spooky campfire feeling of the Friday the 13th franchise.

The First Fridays

Friday the 13th (1980) does in fact take place on Friday, June 13, 1979. That’s the day that a busload of counselors arrive to Camp Crystal Lake, prompting Pamela Voorhees (Betsy Palmer) to kill them off to keep the camp closed. The camp closed when Pamela murdered a couple of counselors back in 1958, in revenge for the death by drowning of her son Jason the previous summer, in 1957.

Pamela dies when survivor Alice (Adrienne King) beheads her, before escaping to the middle of a lake in a canoe. Friday the 13th famously ends with a jump scare inspired by Carrie, in which Jason emerges from the lake to attack Alice, but that may be a hallucination. Whatever it was, Alice is found on Saturday, June 14, 1979, and taken to the hospital. In August 1979, Jason finds Alice and kills her with ice pick.

The main part of Part 2 (1981) takes place five years after the first film, with the opening of another camp. The events take place over a couple of days, with no clear indication of which day it is. Part 3 (1982) begins the day that Part 2 ends and spans through the next evening, ending when Chris Higgins (Dana Kimmell) seemingly kills Jason in a barn. The fourth film, The Final Chapter (1984), begins the following morning and seems to only take place across a day. Which day? We’re not sure, but even if it’s Friday the 13th, that means Part 2 and Part 3 take place Tuesday the tenth through Thursday the 12th.

And now things really get messy. A New Beginning (1985) jumps ahead another five years to 1989, to find Jason’s killer Tommy Jarvis (played by Corey Feldman in The Final Chapter, now by John Shepherd) in a youth home. The events of the film cover a few days, but we can assume that the main murders—committed by some random ambulance driver named Roy (Dick Wieand), pretending to be Jason—take place on Friday the 13th. The same must be true of the events of Jason Lives! (1986), which occur a year after the previous film, despite the fact that Tommy Jarvis is now played by Thom Mathews.

At the end of Jason Lives!, Tommy and Megan (Jennifer Cooke) trap Jason at the bottom of Crystal Lake. The New Blood (1988) happens seven years later in 1997, when telekinetic Tina Shepard (Lar Park Lincoln) uses her powers to accidentally free Jason, setting him off on a murder rampage. Tina’s powers summon the ghost of her father to drag Jason back to the bottom of the lake. At some point, the anchor from a yacht traveling from Crystal Lake to New York City somehow electrifies Jason’s corpse and brings it back to life. We’re not even sure of the year at this point, but let’s just say it’s 1998, since Jason Takes Manhattan released in 1989.

After the disappointing returns on Jason Takes Manhattan Paramount sold the franchise to New Line Cinema, which means we can finally fix the timeline with a reboot. Right?

New Fridays, Same Problems

Wrong!

New Line Cinema released its first entry in the franchise, Jason Goes to Hell: The Final Friday in 1993—five years before the previous movie takes place. But given that the New Line movies have no overt connections to their predecessors made by Paramount, we could say that Jason Goes to Hell acts as a soft reboot, and that the movie takes place in 1993.

All straightened out, right? Well, no, because Jason X (2002) begins in 2010, with Jason in captivity since 2008, and then jumps ahead to 2455. Do they even have Fridays or the number 13 in the future?

It doesn’t matter, because the last two movies in the franchise take us back to the present. First, Freddy vs. Jason happens in 2003, the same year that it released, and the main action occurs on Friday the 13th. But then comes the 2009 remake, which adds its own trouble. The movie begins on Friday, June 13, 1980, when Pamela Voorhees (now played by Star Trek: Deep Space Nine‘s Nana Visitor) goes on her own killing spree, which ends when she gets beheaded by Alice (Stephanie Rhodes) while young Jason watches. On an undisclosed night in 2009, a grown Jason slaughters a group of campers. Six weeks later, more campers arrive and Jason starts killing them.

As this summary shows, the Friday the 13th series doesn’t have any great allegiance to its titular day. The prequel series Crystal Lake, which stars Linda Cardellini as Pamela Voorhees and Callum Vinson as Jason shouldn’t either, because the series has never been about realism and believability. Throughout the franchise, Jason dies and comes back to life, develops the ability to teleport, and has been a cyborg and a demonic worm. And all of it fits together because of the central premise.

The movies take place at a camp ground. They all have the feeling of scary tales told by a fire—in fact, the movies often use scenes of a campfire tale to fill in the events of previous entries. Campfire tales aren’t about narrative consistency or adherence to a calendar. They’re about shock value. And even though Crystal Lake has a respected star and the A24 brand, it cannot abandon that principle. Let the timeline be messy and let Jason feel like a legend told by campers and counselors who just want to freak each other out.

Crystal Lake streams on Peacock on October 15, 2026.

15 Movies We Don’t Watch Because They’re Good

Taste is subjective, and all in all, that’s what makes us unique. Things that everyone likes we might loath, while stuff we adore can be despised by the general public. Of course, there’s nothing wrong with that, although there is a subset of movies that are, if this were possible, objectively bad. And people still love them.

It’s not that they are secret masterpieces, or that the people that enjoy these movies don’t see the mistakes; they see them, celebrate them, and love these films for them. If asked, the people that enjoy these movies will tell you that yes, these pieces of media are bad, and that’s why we enjoy them.

IMDb

The Room

Tommy Wiseau’s The Room became legendary for awkward dialogue, bizarre acting choices, and scenes that make almost no narrative sense. What should have been a failed drama instead turned into one of cinema’s most beloved “so bad it’s good” experiences.

IMDb

Troll 2

Despite having no actual trolls, Troll 2 earned cult status through wooden performances, strange line deliveries, and surreal low-budget chaos. Its infamous “They’re eating her!” scene alone helped turn the movie into midnight-screening history.

IMDb

Birdemic: Shock and Terror

Known for laughably bad visual effects and painfully awkward dialogue, Birdemic somehow became entertaining precisely because of how amateurish everything feels. The attack scenes involving obviously fake birds remain internet-famous among bad movie fans.

IMDb

Batman & Robin

George Clooney’s Batman & Robin is often mocked for neon visuals, endless ice puns, and absurd costume choices. Yet its campy excess and unapologetic silliness have made it strangely rewatchable over the years.

IMDb

Samurai Cop

Samurai Cop combines terrible wigs, bizarre editing, awkward romance scenes, and chaotic action into an unforgettable cult movie. Nearly every scene feels unintentionally hilarious, helping the film gain a devoted audience decades after release.

IMDb

Miami Connection

Martial arts, rock music, ninjas, and unbelievable dialogue somehow collide in Miami Connection. The movie’s complete sincerity makes its ridiculousness oddly charming, especially as every emotional moment becomes funnier than the filmmakers intended.

IMDb

Showgirls

Paul Verhoeven’s Showgirls was initially destroyed by critics for its exaggerated performances and over-the-top melodrama. Over time, however, audiences embraced it as a wildly entertaining spectacle of excess and unintentional comedy.

IMDb

Plan 9 from Outer Space

Often called one of the worst movies ever made, Ed Wood’s Plan 9 from Outer Space survives through sheer passion and chaos. Cheap sets, continuity errors, and awkward alien plotting somehow became part of its appeal.

IMDb

Cats

The 2019 adaptation of Cats shocked audiences with its unsettling digital fur effects and bizarre musical presentation. Even viewers who disliked it often could not stop talking about how strangely hypnotic and surreal the experience became.

IMDb

Mortal Kombat: Annihilation

Packed with weak effects, chaotic editing, and nonstop exposition, Mortal Kombat: Annihilation barely resembles coherent storytelling. Yet fans still revisit it because the movie’s ridiculous energy makes it entertaining in completely unintended ways.

IMDb

Battlefield Earth

John Travolta’s sci-fi disaster became infamous for tilted camera angles, bizarre performances, and confusing storytelling. While critically savaged, its sheer commitment to every strange creative choice turned it into a favorite among bad movie enthusiasts.

IMDb

Maximum Overdrive

Directed by Stephen King himself, Maximum Overdrive embraces killer machines, absurd violence, and total chaos. The movie’s loud, unhinged energy makes it feel less like a horror film and more like a glorious cinematic accident.

IMDb

Fateful Findings

Neil Breen’s Fateful Findings became an internet cult phenomenon thanks to its incomprehensible plot, awkward acting, and surreal editing. Watching it feels like trying to understand a dream someone filmed without explaining any context.

IMDb

The Happening

M. Night Shyamalan’s thriller gained notoriety for awkward dialogue and strangely flat performances during an apocalypse caused by plants. Its serious tone accidentally made many scenes hilarious, giving the movie unexpected cult appeal.

IMDb

Velocipastor

A priest transforming into a dinosaur to fight ninjas sounds fake, but Velocipastor fully commits to the absurd premise. Unlike many bad movies, it knowingly embraces low-budget chaos, making it a favorite for ironic movie nights.

15 Movies That Clearly Wanted to Be the Next Harry Potter

The cultural success (and impact) of the Harry Potter series can’t be underestimated, making it only natural that studios would want to catch that lightning in a second bottle. However, a big part of Harry Potter’s success comes down to luck, something no amount of money can replicate.

With that, we end up with a plethora of book adaptations looking for their next hit. These works, in their literary form, did find success, but that doesn’t immediately translate to a cinema classic. We aren’t talking about things that carved their own identity, like The Hunger Games, but films that were looking to be the next Boy Who Lived.

IMDb

The Golden Compass

New Line Cinema clearly hoped The Golden Compass would launch a massive fantasy franchise built around young heroes, magical worlds, and sprawling lore. Despite strong visuals and a popular book series, the planned sequels never materialized after disappointing box office results. The story did find its place in serialized form.

IMDb

Percy Jackson & the Olympians: The Lightning Thief

Fox heavily positioned Percy Jackson as a young-adult fantasy franchise mixing mythology, school-age heroes, and destiny-driven storytelling. Comparisons to Harry Potter were immediate, though the movie adaptations struggled to match the books’ popularity or critical reception. The story is now being adapted again in Disney+.

IMDb

Eragon

With dragons, ancient prophecies, and a teenage chosen one, Eragon arrived looking like a studio-built fantasy phenomenon. Instead, weak reviews and fan disappointment quickly ended hopes of adapting the rest of Christopher Paolini’s bestselling series.

IMDb

The Mortal Instruments: City of Bones

Studios aggressively pushed The Mortal Instruments as the next major supernatural young-adult franchise after Harry Potter and Twilight. Despite strong source material popularity, the movie underperformed and killed the planned cinematic series almost immediately.

IMDb

The Sorcerer’s Apprentice

Disney’s The Sorcerer’s Apprentice leaned heavily into magical mentorship, hidden wizard societies, and special-effects-driven fantasy. Many viewers saw it as an attempt to capture some of the modern magic-school energy that made Harry Potter such a phenomenon.

IMDb

Beautiful Creatures

Warner Bros. marketed Beautiful Creatures as another supernatural teen franchise built around hidden powers and forbidden romance. Despite its Southern Gothic angle, the film never generated enough momentum to continue adapting the remaining novels.

IMDb

Seventh Son

With monster hunters, magical apprentices, and fantasy warfare, Seventh Son clearly aimed for blockbuster franchise status. Instead, production delays and poor reviews turned it into another expensive fantasy movie that failed to launch a cinematic universe.

IMDb

Miss Peregrine’s Home for Peculiar Children

Tim Burton’s adaptation combined magical children, secret powers, and an isolated academy-like setting that naturally invited Harry Potter comparisons. While visually distinctive, the film never became the breakout franchise many expected from the bestselling novels.

IMDb

The Spiderwick Chronicles

Paramount’s adaptation of The Spiderwick Chronicles mixed hidden fantasy worlds with child protagonists uncovering magical secrets. The setup felt perfectly designed for franchise potential, but the movie remained more of a standalone cult favorite.

IMDb

The Chronicles of Narnia: The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe

Disney and Walden Media heavily positioned Narnia as a fantasy blockbuster series capable of rivaling Harry Potter. Although the first film succeeded commercially, later installments gradually lost momentum and failed to sustain the same cultural dominance.

IMDb

Inkheart

Based on Cornelia Funke’s bestselling novel, Inkheart centered on magical books and fantasy creatures escaping into reality. The family-friendly fantasy tone made comparisons to Harry Potter unavoidable, though audiences never embraced it on the same level.

IMDb

The Dark Is Rising

Fox adapted Susan Cooper’s beloved fantasy novels with hopes of launching another young-adult fantasy saga. Despite the rich mythology behind the books, the film struggled critically and commercially, quickly ending sequel ambitions.

IMDb

Artemis Fowl

Disney spent years developing Artemis Fowl as a potential fantasy franchise built around a gifted young protagonist and hidden magical worlds. The long-awaited adaptation ultimately received harsh reviews and failed to become the next family blockbuster series.

IMDb

Cirque du Freak: The Vampire’s Assistant

Universal tried turning Darren Shan’s popular vampire novels into a long-running fantasy franchise. With magical creatures, chosen-one themes, and teen protagonists, the similarities to other post-Harry Potter adaptations were hard to ignore.

IMDb

The School for Good and Evil

Netflix’s fantasy adaptation practically embraces the “magical school” formula outright, complete with chosen students and rival academies. While more fairy-tale-focused than Harry Potter, it clearly aims for a similar young fantasy audience and franchise potential.