Looks Like Spider-Man: Brand New Day Just Added Another Avenger

Kevin Feige seems to be staying one step ahead of notable spoiler generator Tom Holland this time around, as the Marvel boss rolled up at BiliBili World in Shanghai this past weekend to tease yet another recognizable addition to the cast of Spider-Man: Brand New Day ahead of the movie’s release later this month.

While standing next to a woman dressed as Florence Pugh’s MCU character Yelena Belova on stage, Feige told the audience at BiliBili World that “If you’re a fan of Yelena, wait until Avengers: Doomsday. Yelena plays a big part in that,” adding, “But if you don’t want to wait until then, you might see Yelena a little bit sooner in the movies.”

Since Brand New Day is the only remaining Marvel movie left on the calendar before Avengers: Doomsday is released, we can probably put the pieces together ourselves here and say that Pugh will indeed appear in the upcoming Spidey fourquel, though whether that’s in the main plot of the film or a post-credits scene remains to be seen.

Pugh has made quite an impact on the Marvel Cinematic Universe since her debut in 2021’s Black Widow, where she was introduced as Natasha Romanoff’s estranged sister. The two spent some time together in their childhood years before being separated and trained in General Dreykov’s Red Room, where they became elite assassins known as “Black Widows.” Yelena eventually broke away from the group’s conditioning and repaired her relationship with Natasha before she died during the events of Avengers: Endgame.

Yelena then disappeared during the Blip and resurfaced under the employ of Valentina Allegra de Fontaine (Julia Louis-Dreyfus), who tried to dispose of her but accidentally forced her to team up with powerful yet forgotten villains and antiheroes like John Walker and Ghost. Along with Red Guardian, Bucky Barnes, and Bob Reynolds a.k.a Sentry, they were encouraged to form the New Avengers under Fontaine’s guidance.

Doomsday will mark Pugh’s first appearance in a real Avengers movie, but it is not yet known whether her character will survive the events of the movie to reappear in Marvel’s follow-up blockbuster, Avengers: Secret Wars. The actress has been candid in the past about her popular role, telling Total Film that when she first signed up to play Yelena, “lots of people from the indie-film world were all telling me that I was never going to go back to small movies again, and it always kind of wound me up,” but added that she thinks “there’s beauty in all types of those films. There’s beauty in the massive, epic storylines like Dune, like Marvel, like even Oppenheimer that I did. They’re amazing, mega movies.”

It looks like we can now add Brand New Day to Pugh’s impressive list of amazing, mega movies.

Spider-Man: Brand New Day is set for release on July 31.

Anne Hathaway and Matt Damon on the ‘Deeply Kind Person Behind Christopher Nolan’s Genius’

Christopher Nolan’s reputation precedes the man these days. He is one of the last Hollywood directors whose name alone is a brand; a calling card; a promise on the poster that you’re about to see something epic. It’s synonymous with IMAX spectacle and enigmatic characters. What might be less publicized or celebrated, however, are the humane qualities that make him so compelling as a storyteller. They’re crucial though for any leader whom men and women will follow on to the ends of the earth—or at least the Tyrrhenian Sea off the coast of Sicily.

“So before the scene where I’m lashed to the mast and face the Sirens, Chris was waiting for me on the dock with Hoyte [van Hoytema],” actor Matt Damon says with a smile, and perhaps the hint of a sigh, while recounting to us The Odyssey’s shoot across the Mediterranean. The scene in question is pivotal in Homer’s epic poem about a Greek king unable to get home. In the Ancient Greek text, it is here where the ethereal Sirens whisper sweet honey into Odysseus’ ear as he’s tied to his ship’s mast, sailing past their treacherous rocks. In Nolan’s movie, that sweetness is also implied, as is the Sirens’ primal beauty as observed from a distance. But what most forcefully trickles into Odysseus’ ear—and across Damon’s face in extended closeup—is nothing less than psychological agony. He hears the broken promises and waylaid desires whispered between a separated husband and wife. And feels the tears of torment.

“So it’s at six in the morning when we’d leave,” Damon explains, “and I had my armor and everything on, and saw them on the dock. Normally they took off on the camera boat before us, because it takes about an hour to get out there, but they knew I had to do this scene that day. And Chris said, ‘Hoyte and I were saying we should start with [you], and shoot till we’re happy. And then we’ll get the other pieces that we need.’”

It’s a small gesture, but for an actor like Damon, it might be the most graceful piece of direction he ever got from Nolan after three films together. Instead of focusing on the riggings, coverage, or capturing the Greeks’ authentic, wooden longship in the morning sun, Nolan and his cinematographer would just shoot one of the most emotionally taxing closeups of the movie until they, and Damon, were satisfied.

“That does a lot of things,” Damon says. “Number one, it means you’re not going to have to sit around all day. It’s like, I know I have one hour on a boat ride [where] I can get my mind right, and the second I step off that boat we’re going. And we’re going to shoot till we’re happy, meaning we’re going to do this a lot, we’re not leaving until we get everything we need. It seems like very simple direction, but there’s a lot of wisdom.”

Wisdom, and as added by Damon’s co-star and the other emotional anchor of The Odyssey, acute empathy.

“There’s a lot of humanity,” Anne Hathaway says of her director. “So I liked Chris, I was sort of amazed by him, but those little moments make you realize, ‘Oh, there’s a really deeply kind person inside this genius that we revere.’”

Hathaway’s seen it many times over, having collaborated with Nolan for longer than Damon, beginning with her stint as Catwoman in 2012’s The Dark Knight Rises, which is an experience she still looks back on with pride, especially with how it established a fruitful creative relationship.

“When we were working on Dark Knight Rises together, which I think I was 27 years old or something like that on, I couldn’t believe my good luck,” Hathaway remembers. “Because I was still very much the girl from The Princess Diaries, but all of a sudden I got to be on a Christopher Nolan movie playing this character that had meant so much to me my entire life. So I just wanted to be so prepared, I wanted to do such a good job. I just wanted to leave it all on the table, and I think he knew that about me.”

She continues, “So we were doing a sequence and before it even started, he just came up to me and said, ‘You know what, I just wanted to let you know we’re going to do a lot of takes of this because I’ve just had it in my head a certain way for a really long time, and I just need it to flow this certain way. So I’m going to do a lot of takes, but it’s not because you’re doing anything wrong.’” It is a note of humility and preemptive concern.

That probing sympathy for all the filmmaking talent and characterization at play becomes blindingly self-evident in The Odyssey, a film where the entire cast from stars like Damon and Hathaway, to the smallest of supporting roles, are filled with Oscar winners and AAA talent. Hence while even Homer’s Helen of Troy is depicted mostly as the dutiful wife of Menelaus, the Spartan king who fought a bloody war of attrition for 10 years on the shores of Troy after she was taken by (or left him for?) a Trojan prince, the Helen played by Lupita Nyong’o opposite Jon Bernthal’s Menelaus must convey oceans of pained emotions in only a handful of scenes.

“Helen of Troy is kind of ubiquitous,” Nyong’o says. “We all know a version of the Helen story… but oftentimes the women are footnotes in these stories, so it was nice to flesh it out.” While she had not read The Odyssey in full while growing up in Kenya, Nyong’o became extremely familiar with various versions of the Trojan War myth, and what a woman like Helen might think about having an entire war fought in her name.

Adds the Oscar winner, “I do think that this film asks us to consider more than just her face.”

It also asks us to consider the emotional turmoil of even a man who clearly seems to resent that face after being reunited with it. Bernthal’s Menelaus is still married to Helen after the war’s end—which is more accurate to the Greek myths than 2004’s Troy ever got—but there is an inherent contradiction between how coldly the Spartan king treats his returned wife versus the genuine kindness he shows Telemachus, Odysseus’ young adult son played by Tom Holland.

“I think in the canon of Chris’ work and in the canon of all great storytelling, it’s always a gray area,” Bernthal reflects. “It’s not, ‘Okay, this is a good guy, this is the bad guy.’ It’s about what are the characters going through? I think there’s deep shame, there’s deep anger, there’s deep bitterness, there’s deep sadness, there’s deep survivor’s guilt. All this stuff is going on.”

Like Homer, it is tapping into universal emotions bigger than just heroes and villains. Anyone can relate to the pull of wanting to go home—or the fear that they blew it somehow by leaving. In some ways, The Odyssey feels like a culmination in Nolan’s work, and not just because it is the third movie where a hero must fight his way across vast distances to get back to Ms. Hathaway. It is also another story about the longing of home and family—and the fear of being unable to see them again not because of external forces, but due to internal, human ones.

“The first thing I said to Chris when I read the script was, ‘Wow, this traffic’s in a lot of the same themes as Oppenheimer,’” Damon reveals. “Just because I just felt that’s a story about accountability for what you’ve done and the decisions you’ve made. Odysseus is very much responsible for his own ingenuity and living with the effects of that.”

It is another film about a great man who does terrible things, and in the aftermath is unsure if he even deserves the home life he yearns for. It’s about the moral anguish of a struggling husband tied to the mast, not the spectacle he alone might be privy to. The intimate scope of Nolan’s epics in a nutshell.

The Odyssey opens in theaters on Friday, July 17.

Marvel Reveals New Look at Avengers: Doomsday With Loki at the Center of Everything

A new official look at Avengers: Doomsday’s ensemble cast offers some fascinating insights into the upcoming superhero blockbuster, which is still keeping much of its story under wraps ahead of Marvel’s return to San Diego Comic-Con later this month.

Although the ensemble was already announced a while ago with some strategically placed chairs, this new look seems to confirm a few rumors about the construction of the film’s team-ups, but also highlights Loki (Tom Hiddleston) in quite a mysterious yet important way.

Andy Park, who has been a key part of Marvel’s Visual Development team since 2010 and was laid off by the company in April 2026 as part of The Walt Disney Company’s devastating corporate cuts, shared the new look at Avengers: Doomsday on social media this past weekend, writing that it marked “the final full film I had the honor of leading as Director of Visual Development at Marvel Studios” and that the impressive illustration “commemorates that journey & reveals the characters & their looks for the first time.”

Fans were quick to point out that there seem to be three distinct superhero teams in Avengers: Doomsday, with The New Avengers, Thor, Ant-Man, and a bearded Steve Rogers grouped together, the X-Men aligned, and the Fantastic Four standing with Sam Wilson Captain America, Shang-Chi, Shuri Black Panther and M’Baku.

Though the reveal of Doctor Doom’s menacingly masked face between Steve Rogers (holding a reformed Mjolnir) and Reed Richards seems to confirm that both heroes will indeed play a large role in whatever plans Doom has for the Marvel Cinematic Universe, it was the center of Park’s illustration that drew a surprising amount of attention, for it was there that fans noticed the almost spectral illustration of Hiddleston’s Loki right in the center, still sitting atop his throne at the foot of Yggdrasil, where he maintains the multiversal timelines of the MCU.

The exact nature of Loki’s role in Avengers: Doomsday has been one of the movie’s greatest mysteries. As a villain, Loki was a huge part of the first Avengers film back in 2012, but was killed off at the start of Avengers: Infinity War. A variant of the character then managed to escape during the Time Heist in Avengers: Endgame, leading him on a time-bending journey in the critically acclaimed Disney+ series Loki.

Removing Loki from his glorious purpose as the God who now sits at the heart of the MCU’s timelines has long been theorized as a key move for any villain who would want to mess with the multiverse, but whether Doctor Doom will find Loki an easy target remains to be seen in Avengers: Doomsday, which will lead to the Multiverse Saga-ending Avengers: Secret Wars in 2027.

Naturally, Hiddleston has been tight-lipped about what we can expect from his beloved character in Avengers: Doomsday, simply telling GQ that the film is “monumental” and that the “surprising” center of the story “has never been done before.”

Avengers: Doomsday is set for release on December 18.

15 People Share the Gaming ‘Masterpiece’ They Just Can’t Get Into

Not everyone likes everything, and that’s ok; having distinct tastes is what makes us interesting, and worthy of sharing experiences. But of course, when everyone is singing the praise of a game or franchise, you want to know what that is all about. Only to encounter that these so-called ‘masterpieces’ don’t really click with you.

We know there’s nothing wrong with that, even if we can’t help but feel left out. This is how users of Reddit felt when sharing their own experiences, and these are the most notable games they mentioned. Look through this list to find people who think like you, or wonder how they could not enjoy the timeless classic you love.

IMDb

The Sims

The Sims remains one of the best-selling life simulation franchises ever made, but its open-ended gameplay isn’t for everyone. Some players simply prefer games with clearer objectives and a stronger sense of progression.

IMDb

Undertale

Praised for its memorable characters, humor, and unconventional combat system, Undertale has earned classic status. Even so, its unique style and quirky presentation don’t resonate with every player who gives it a try.

YouTube/PlayStation

Fortnite

As one of the defining battle royale games, Fortnite attracts millions with its constant updates and crossover events. For others, the fast-paced multiplayer focus and competitive nature never quite click.

IMDb

Metro 2033

Known for its immersive atmosphere and post-apocalyptic storytelling, Metro 2033 has a devoted following. Some players, however, struggle with its slower pacing and survival mechanics despite appreciating its world-building.

IMDb

Hollow Knight

Hollow Knight is widely regarded as one of the finest Metroidvanias ever made. Its challenging combat, interconnected world, and demanding exploration can nevertheless prove frustrating for players seeking a more forgiving experience.

IMDb

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt

Frequently cited among the greatest RPGs ever created, The Witcher 3 offers a massive world and acclaimed storytelling. Some players simply never connect with its combat, pacing, or lengthy quest structure.

IMDb

Red Dead Redemption 2

Rockstar’s western epic is celebrated for its realism and attention to detail. Others find its deliberately slow movement, lengthy animations, and methodical pacing difficult to enjoy despite recognizing its craftsmanship.

IMDb

Outer Wilds

Outer Wilds has been praised for its exploration and mystery-driven design. Players expecting more traditional progression sometimes struggle with its time loop structure and the freedom to uncover answers independently.

IMDb

The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild

Nintendo reinvented the Zelda formula with a vast open world and player freedom. While many embraced the changes, others missed the series’ traditional dungeon structure and found weapon durability frustrating.

IMDb

The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim

Skyrim has remained enormously popular for more than a decade thanks to its expansive world and modding community. Still, some players never become invested in its combat or open-ended quest design.

IMDb

Diablo III

Blizzard’s action RPG refined its gameplay considerably after launch and built a loyal audience. Even so, its loot-focused progression and repetitive endgame loop aren’t enough to hook every player.

IMDb

Disco Elysium

Acclaimed for its writing and role-playing depth, Disco Elysium stands apart from most RPGs. Players looking for traditional combat or faster gameplay sometimes find its dialogue-heavy approach difficult to embrace.

IMDb

Warframe

Warframe offers years’ worth of content and fast-paced cooperative gameplay. However, its complex systems, steep learning curve, and overwhelming amount of mechanics can discourage newcomers before everything falls into place.

IMDb

Elden Ring

FromSoftware’s acclaimed open-world adventure earned widespread praise for its exploration and challenging combat. Even so, its demanding difficulty and minimal guidance remain significant barriers for players who prefer more accessible experiences.

IMDb

Factorio

Factorio has become a benchmark for factory-building games through its intricate automation systems. Players who don’t enjoy optimization, logistics, or gradually expanding production lines often find it difficult to get invested.

15 Movies Where Your Mom Can’t Stop Asking Questions

Older generations tend to have problems following overly complicated movies, especially if they’re used to having movies only as background noise or as a relaxing activity. If you’re watching a movie with them, they’ll feel like the plot is impossible to follow. It’s hard to enjoy a film when watching with someone who keeps wondering who’s who, what just happened, or why everyone suddenly looks different.

Through their complicated plots and original ideas, these films reward careful viewing and tend to generate a steady stream of questions from anyone who isn’t completely locked into the story. Be careful who you choose as a watching partner in the future.

IMDb

Inception

Christopher Nolan’s dream-heist thriller constantly shifts between multiple dream layers moving at different speeds. Missing one explanation about the rules almost guarantees confusion once the story reaches its increasingly complex finale.

IMDb

Tenet

Time inversion, overlapping timelines, and dialogue packed with scientific terminology make Tenet one of Christopher Nolan’s most demanding films. Even attentive viewers often need a second watch to fully piece everything together.

IMDb

The Prestige

The rivalry between two magicians unfolds through journals, flashbacks, and carefully hidden twists. The movie constantly encourages viewers to question what they’re seeing until the final revelations reframe everything.

IMDb

Mulholland Drive

David Lynch’s surreal mystery deliberately blurs dreams, identity, and reality. Rather than offering straightforward answers, the film invites interpretation, making it a guaranteed source of confused questions during family movie night.

IMDb

Memento

Because the main storyline unfolds in reverse chronological order, viewers gradually discover information alongside the protagonist. Looking away for even a few minutes makes reconnecting the narrative significantly more difficult.

IMDb

Primer

Made on a tiny budget, Primer presents time travel with remarkable complexity and very little exposition. The overlapping timelines have inspired countless diagrams from fans trying to untangle the story.

IMDb

Cloud Atlas

Six interconnected stories unfold across different eras with actors playing multiple roles under extensive makeup. Keeping track of the shifting timelines and recurring faces can become surprisingly challenging.

IMDb

Donnie Darko

Between alternate timelines, mysterious visions, and philosophical discussions about time travel, Donnie Darko leaves many viewers debating its meaning long after the credits finish rolling.

IMDb

Everything Everywhere All at Once

The film rapidly jumps across countless alternate universes while balancing action, comedy, and emotional family drama. Its constant multiverse shifts require viewers to pay close attention throughout.

IMDb

Coherence

A dinner party becomes increasingly confusing after a cosmic event causes multiple realities to overlap. The film reveals its mysteries gradually, rewarding viewers who carefully track each character’s movements.

IMDb

The Fountain

Darren Aronofsky tells three seemingly connected stories spanning different periods and realities. The emotional throughline eventually emerges, but the unconventional structure often leaves first-time viewers searching for answers.

IMDb

Shutter Island

Martin Scorsese’s psychological thriller constantly challenges the audience’s understanding of reality. As new clues emerge, viewers are encouraged to reconsider everything they believed about the investigation.

IMDb

Enemy

Denis Villeneuve’s adaptation of José Saramago’s novel embraces ambiguity from beginning to end. Doppelgängers, symbolism, and an unforgettable final image have made it one of modern cinema’s most debated films.

IMDb

The Matrix Reloaded

The sequel expands its mythology with philosophical conversations, new factions, and complicated rules governing the Matrix. Viewers expecting another straightforward action movie often find themselves struggling to keep up.

IMDb

Synecdoche, New York

Charlie Kaufman’s drama steadily dissolves the boundaries between reality, theater, and imagination. As years pass in unconventional ways and stories fold into each other, following the narrative becomes increasingly demanding.

Summer Box Office Blues Are Starting to Feel Like 1969

In 2015, Steven Spielberg received a lot of flack in the press—and even more on social media—when he suggested the type of modern mega blockbuster he helped pioneer, and which superhero movies specifically came to embody in the 2010s, was headed for a crash. At the time, sections of Film Twitter bristled at the assertion that “there’s eventually going to be an implosion—or a big meltdown. There’s going to be an implosion where three or four or maybe even a half-dozen mega-budget movies are going to go crashing into the ground, and that’s going to change the paradigm.”

There is a degree of irony in this—including that Spielberg’s own Disclosure Day is underperforming, if far from crashing, this summer—with the king of blockbusters projecting the demise of its current iteration. But for anyone with a sense of film history, observed or lived-through the case of Spielberg, it made a lot of sense. After all, the Jaws director and many of his friends in the 1970s were only able to breakthrough after the final death rattles of the Golden Age studio system in the 1960s. It’s a twist of history that increasingly seeming prescient in the summer box office season of 2026…

Technically, it’s been a rosy summer and year for theater owners and moviegoers. Supply, and therefore the variety of movies that get made, is up, as is attendance and box office receipts. Last spring saw box office revenue grow by 23 percent over 2025, which is the best since the pandemic. Yet as is becoming glaringly apparent, a lot of that revenue is being generated from surprise corners like the new wave of Gen-Z filmmakers who are making their bones on YouTube before pivoting to original horror movies like Obsession, Backrooms, and Iron Lung, or films at least in genres that have largely been neglected by the studios in the last 10 years, a la adult-skewing, dialogue-heavy sci-fi films ike Project Hail Mary and the female-led workplace comedy represented by the ascendant Devil Wears Prada 2.

Meanwhile this past weekend saw what on paper was another four-quadrant, franchise-mandated “sure thing” crash and burn on its opening weekend. That makes at least four in little more than a month.

While many (including ourselves) might have rolled their eyes at the logic behind remaking Moana just nine and a half years after the new animated classic, no one thought it was a commercially risky proposition. Disney’s live-action remake formula has run into snags when it’s turned to Boomer-nostalgia for pre-1980s animated films like Snow White and Dumbo, but when the Mouse House has targeted the warm and fuzzy memories of millennials and zillennials, they have seen billion-dollar success via remakes like The Lion King, Aladdin, and Beauty and the Beast. And last year’s Lilo & Stitch retread was aimed squarely at Gen Z and still cleared that magical 10-figure range.

Nevertheless, the Moana remake, complete with Dwayne Johnson reprising his beloved role as Maui from the 2016 animated movie, failed to draw out families or young adult moviegoers with fond memories of just how far Moana can go. As of press time, the movie is estimated to have grossed a mere $43 million, a figure only marginally better than the much snarked about Supergirl and it’s $37 million debut, albeit Moana has an even dizzier price tag of a reported $250 million(!) attached.

There will no doubt be plenty of reasons to speculate on this individual failure, although it is not the “brand” this time. Moana 2 just grossed $1 billion less than two years ago. More crucially, however, is the realization that Moana’s flopping is not happening in a vacuum. It’s part of an ongoing trend that’s rocked the summer blockbuster season to its core following dismal performances of WB’s Supergirl, Amazon MGM’s Masters of the Universe, and Lucasfilm’s Star Wars: The Mandalorian and Grogu. That last one I even wrote was not catastrophic when it opened to “only” $98 million over Memorial Day weekend. Granted, even from the jump it was the worst opening for any Star Wars movie, but if the core audience liked it, it could’ve represented a rebuilding moment. Yet the picture then dropped an eye-watering 70 percent in its second weekend, showing that core word-of-mouth was actually dire. Worse, it dropped to third place at the box office, falling behind the $750,000-budgeted Obsession in its third weekend.

That movie’s misfortunes turned out to be the beginning of a trend. And at least the Star Wars spinoff still crossed $340 million worldwide. That is a number Amazon MGM’s attempt to return to the ‘80s nostalgia well with Masters of the Universe will never see, nor Supergirl which suffered a bleaker 77 percent drop in its second weekend. Meanwhile Universal Pictures and Illumination’s Minions & Monsters (a movie a lot of critics, including myself, consider to be the best film in the Minions franchise) also underperformed when it grossed only $62 million in its long five-day holiday weekend. The last Minions movie opened to $123 million across the same Fourth of July corridor in 2022.

Each underperformer has its own variables and reasons for stalling—and I even quite enjoyed two out of the four biggest disappointments—but collectively they paint a picture that sounds a lot like Spielberg’s once-derided prediction. To be clear, even then Spielberg did not state it with scorn, or with an expectation that superhero movies are some enemy of cinema. He was just comparing the decline of one generational form of entertainment to another.

In a follow-up 2015 interview, he put a finer point on it when he said, “We were around when the Western died, and there will be a time when the superhero movie goes the way of the Western. It doesn’t mean there won’t be another occasion where the Western comes back, and the superhero movie someday returns… I’m only saying that these cycles have a finite time in popular culture.”

He might have pointed specifically to superheroes and Westerns, but the larger scale of this reminds me just as much of the collapse of musicals alongside the Western and historical/biblical epic in the 1960s. All three were the meat and potatoes of Hollywood during the 1950s if not earlier. The Arthur Freed Unit at MGM, a bit like Marvel Studios in the 2010s, was turning out hit after hit throughout the ‘40s and ‘50s: Meet Me in St. Louis, Easter Parade, Gigi, the 1951 remake of Show Boat, and of course Singin’ in the Rain. It laid the groundwork for the even bigger mega-musicals of the 1960s that, for a time, were the biggest hits on the block via My Fair Lady, Mary Poppins, and The Sound of Music. But come 1969—a year that saw Spielberg’s Boomer contemporaries like Dennis Hopper and Peter Fonda making Easy Rider and the X-rated Midnight Cowboy win Best Picture—the musicals Hello, Dolly! and Paint Your Wagon absolutely crashed at the box office.

That last one, Wagon, was furthermore a musical-Western hybrid, complete with Clint Eastwood in a dubiously tuneful role. But like the musical’s rapid decline in the late ‘60s, the Western and other increasingly creaky “epics” were suddenly strangling their studios. Joseph Mankiewicz and Elizabeth Taylor’s enormous Cleopatra nearly bankrupted 20th Century Fox in 1963, and then left the door for the moribund musical Doctor Dolittle to finish the job, at least by the old economic standards. And while Spaghetti Westerns and deconstructionist Oaters made on a budget flourished in the ‘60s, many of the big studio epics like The Alamo (1960) and 1967’s The Way West fizzled. The latter came out in the same year as box office juggernauts The Graduate and Bonnie & Clyde, and one year before horror movie Rosemary’s Baby and the sci-fi 2001: A Space Odyssey were rewriting the commercial and artistic limits of “genre” moviemaking.

None of which is to say franchise movies are going away. Disney/Pixar’s Toy Story 5 is one of the best movies of the year and its biggest hit. The historical epic also had a major resurgence in the early 21st century thanks to movies like Gladiator, Braveheart, and Troy, and the musical came back in a big way during the same period thanks to Moulin Rouge! and Chicago, and never left. The “historical” epic might also resurface again after this coming weekend’s The Odyssey.

But that is the point: things move in cycles, and what seems to still be working at the moment is prestige “event” cinema—as well as things studios have largely eschewed or neglected. While the horror movie has remained one of the few genres to thrive with original titles over the last decade, it’s also among the few that studios continually invest in. But a new crop of filmmakers breaking through those testing grounds via YouTube? That’s new.

Conversely, The Devil Wears Prada 2 is absolutely another legacy sequel to a popular movie, but its over-performance this summer suggests audiences of all ages are starved for adult-aimed comedies. The same might be applied to high-concept sci-fi movies not part of a franchise, like Project Hail Mary. And like Christopher Nolan with The Odyssey, Phil Lord and Chris Miller are directors with strong followings among Gen-Z and millennial audiences.

What we might be seeing is the collapse of a system that relies purely on name and brand-recognition for a built-in audience. For the last 20-some years that has been a winning formula in Hollywood. But so was the Western and musical once upon a time.

15 Movies Where the Opening Scene Is Better Than the Ending

The beginning of a movie usually sets the tone for what’s to come, so if a film starts strong, you know you’re in for a good time. Unfortunately, not every movie manages to stick the landing, letting that starting section overshadow everything that comes after it.

That doesn’t necessarily make these bad films, but it does leave viewers remembering the first few minutes more fondly than the final ones. These movies all feature opening scenes that are widely praised, even by fans who feel the endings never quite lived up to that spectacular start.

IMDb

Ghost Ship

The opening aboard a luxury ocean liner features one of horror’s most shocking sequences. While the rest of the film has its fans, many viewers agree it never again reaches the sheer impact of its unforgettable introduction.

IMDb

28 Weeks Later

The opening farmhouse escape is frequently regarded as one of the franchise’s finest moments. Although the film remains entertaining, many critics and fans consider its tense introduction stronger than its chaotic finale.

IMDb

Swordfish

The movie begins with John Travolta’s memorable monologue before launching into an explosive opening involving a massive blast. Despite continuing with stylish action, the ending rarely receives the same level of praise.

IMDb

Valerian and the City of a Thousand Planets

Its opening montage, showing humanity gradually expanding into space alongside alien civilizations, is widely celebrated. Many viewers found the imaginative introduction more compelling than the film’s later story and conclusion.

IMDb

Jeepers Creepers

The opening stretches of highway suspense create an atmosphere of mounting dread through simple storytelling. Once the creature becomes fully revealed, many fans feel the mystery that made the beginning so effective fades away.

IMDb

Spectre

The elaborate single-take sequence during Mexico City’s Day of the Dead celebration stands among James Bond’s best openings. The rest of the film, however, received a much more mixed response from audiences and critics.

IMDb

X-Men Origins: Wolverine

A montage depicting Logan and Victor fighting through multiple wars is often singled out as the film’s highlight. Many viewers felt the story never matched the excitement established during those opening minutes.

IMDb

The Empty Man

Its haunting prologue in the Himalayas functions almost like a standalone horror short. Even admirers of the full movie often describe the opening as its strongest and most memorable section.

IMDb

Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice

Bruce Wayne witnessing the destruction of Metropolis from ground level offers a compelling new perspective on familiar events. The emotionally charged opening earned broader praise than the film’s heavily debated conclusion.

IMDb

Army of the Dead

The energetic opening credits efficiently tell the story of a zombie outbreak through action and music. Many viewers considered this montage more entertaining than the lengthy heist narrative that followed.

IMDb

Darkness Falls

The opening legend surrounding the Tooth Fairy delivers effective supernatural horror. As the film progresses, many critics felt it became more conventional, making the chilling introduction its lasting highlight.

IMDb

Mortal Kombat (2021)

The opening confrontation between Hanzo Hasashi and Bi-Han received widespread acclaim for its emotional weight and choreography. Many fans felt the remainder of the reboot never quite reached that same standard.

IMDb

The Bye Bye Man

Its unsettling 1969 prologue establishes an intriguing supernatural mystery. Although the premise generated curiosity, the film’s conclusion was generally viewed as far less effective than its opening promise.

IMDb

Snake Eyes

Brian De Palma’s lengthy opening sequence creates remarkable tension through seemingly continuous camerawork. While the mystery remains engaging, many critics felt the resolution lacked the same level of excitement and ingenuity.

IMDb

The Happening

The mysterious and unsettling opening incidents immediately establish an intriguing premise. As the story unfolds, however, many audiences felt the explanation and ending failed to capitalize on that compelling beginning.

15 Historical Figures Who Were Decades Ahead of Their Time

What do we mean when we say that someone was ahead of their time? Simply put, it’s when a person shares ideas that aren’t understood by their peers, and only appreciated many years later. This gap between underappreciated and understanding can take decades or even centuries, hence why we can only talk about historical figures instead of current ones.

This has the potential to mean that, in our current age, there might be people who we don’t understand, only for our descendants to see them as revolutionary. There’s little way for us to have that perspective now, but at least we can see the figures of the past to prepare for the future.

IMDb

Leonardo da Vinci

Centuries before powered flight or armored vehicles existed, Leonardo da Vinci sketched concepts resembling helicopters, parachutes, tanks, and other machines. Many of his designs couldn’t be realized until technology finally caught up hundreds of years later.

IMDb

Susan B. Anthony

Susan B. Anthony devoted most of her adult life to women’s suffrage in the United States. Although she died in 1906, women didn’t gain the constitutional right to vote nationwide until the Nineteenth Amendment was ratified in 1920.

Wikipedia

Alfred Wegener

In 1915, Alfred Wegener proposed that Earth’s continents had once formed a single landmass before drifting apart. His continental drift theory was widely dismissed until plate tectonics provided the evidence decades later.

IMDb

Vincent van Gogh

Vincent van Gogh sold very few paintings during his lifetime and struggled for recognition. Today, his bold use of color and expressive style make him one of history’s most influential and celebrated artists.

IMDb

Sinéad O’Connor

In 1992, Sinéad O’Connor tore up a photograph of Pope John Paul II on live television to protest abuse within the Catholic Church. She faced intense backlash before later revelations validated many of her concerns.

IMDb

Ada Lovelace

Working with Charles Babbage’s proposed Analytical Engine, Ada Lovelace wrote what is widely recognized as the first published computer algorithm. She also envisioned computers handling tasks beyond simple mathematics, an extraordinary insight for the 1840s.

IMDb

Dr. Thomas Dent Mütter

Thomas Dent Mütter revolutionized reconstructive and cosmetic surgery by introducing innovative techniques that improved patient outcomes. He also advocated for cleaner surgical practices before anesthesia and antiseptic methods became standard.

IMDb

Joseph Lister

Joseph Lister transformed surgery by promoting antiseptic techniques based on germ theory. Although initially ridiculed by many contemporaries, his methods dramatically reduced postoperative infections and became a cornerstone of modern medicine.

IMDb

Mustafa Kemal Atatürk

After founding modern Turkey, Mustafa Kemal Atatürk introduced sweeping secular, educational, and legal reforms. His policies expanded women’s rights and modernized the country decades before many neighboring nations pursued similar changes.

IMDb

Charles Babbage

Charles Babbage designed the Analytical Engine during the nineteenth century, envisioning a programmable mechanical computer. Although never completed, its architecture anticipated many concepts found in modern computers more than a century later.

IMDb

Nikola Tesla

Nikola Tesla envisioned wireless communication, remote control, and global transmission of information long before such technologies became practical. Many of his ideas foreshadowed later developments in telecommunications and electrical engineering.

IMDb

Nicolas Appert

In 1809, Nicolas Appert developed airtight food preservation by sealing and heating containers. His breakthrough laid the foundation for modern canning and dramatically improved long-term food storage decades before refrigeration became widespread.

IMDb

Archimedes

Archimedes made groundbreaking discoveries in mathematics, engineering, and physics more than two thousand years ago. His work on buoyancy, levers, and mechanical devices remained foundational for centuries and continues to influence science today.

IMDb

Ignaz Semmelweis

Long before germ theory gained acceptance, Ignaz Semmelweis demonstrated that doctors washing their hands dramatically reduced deaths from childbed fever. Many colleagues rejected his findings, despite the clear evidence supporting his observations.

IMDb

Rachel Carson

Rachel Carson’s 1962 book Silent Spring warned about the environmental dangers of widespread pesticide use, particularly DDT. Initially attacked by chemical companies, her work helped launch the modern environmental movement and reshaped conservation policy.

15 Horror Movies That Could’ve Ended in Ten Minutes

We need characters to make less than optimal choices for movies to happen, that much we know. They might ignore an obvious warning, open a mysterious door, or decide to investigate the strange noise instead of leaving.

While these choices make for entertaining films, they can also leave audiences wondering why nobody simply took the sensible option. In many cases, one practical decision made in the opening minutes could have prevented everything that followed. These horror movies are memorable examples of stories that might have wrapped up almost immediately with a little more common sense.

IMDb

The Ring

Rachel’s investigation begins after watching a mysterious videotape tied to a deadly curse. Simply refusing to watch the tape or making copies only after understanding its danger could have prevented much of the ordeal.

IMDb

Hellraiser

Frank Cotton unleashes the Cenobites by solving the mysterious Lament Configuration. Leaving the strange puzzle box untouched would have ended the story before it ever truly began.

IMDb

The Cabin in the Woods

Curt and his friends could have driven away after encountering multiple unsettling warning signs on their trip. Ignoring the creepy cabin altogether would have prevented them from becoming part of the ritual.

IMDb

Jeepers Creepers

After witnessing a man disposing of suspicious bundles down a pipe, the siblings return to investigate. Continuing their drive instead of satisfying their curiosity would have avoided the Creeper entirely.

IMDb

Barbarian

Tess discovers clear signs that something is terribly wrong beneath the rental house. Calling the police and leaving immediately would have been far safer than repeatedly exploring the hidden tunnels herself.

IMDb

Talk to Me

The supernatural chaos begins because a group treats a haunted embalmed hand like a party game. Refusing to participate would have prevented nearly every tragedy that follows.

IMDb

Smile

Rose’s curse spreads after witnessing a patient’s horrifying death. Seeking immediate help while strictly avoiding further exposure to the curse might have changed the outcome before it escalated.

IMDb

The Descent

The caving expedition becomes disastrous long before creatures appear because the group enters an undocumented cave system. Choosing the planned route would have eliminated almost every danger they encounter.

IMDb

Candyman

Helen repeatedly ignores warnings surrounding the Candyman legend and continues investigating alone. Walking away after her initial research would likely have spared her the terrifying consequences.

IMDb

The Blair Witch Project

The filmmakers become hopelessly lost after pressing deeper into unfamiliar woods despite repeated warning signs. Turning back at the first sign of trouble could have ended their documentary safely.

IMDb

Hostel

The backpackers abandon safer travel plans after strangers recommend a remote hostel. Declining the invitation and sticking to established tourist routes would have prevented their horrific ordeal.

IMDb

The Taking of Deborah Logan

The documentary crew chooses to continue filming increasingly disturbing events despite obvious danger. Ending production and leaving the property would have dramatically shortened the story.

IMDb

Sinister

True-crime writer Ellison Oswalt knowingly moves his family into a murder house without telling them. Rejecting the house altogether would have prevented them from ever encountering Bughuul’s influence.

IMDb

Oculus

Kaylie insists on confronting the cursed mirror instead of destroying or permanently isolating it from a distance. Avoiding direct interaction with the artifact would have greatly reduced its power over her.

IMDb

The Grudge

Many victims become cursed simply by entering the haunted Saeki house. Leaving immediately after recognizing something was wrong would have been the only realistic path to avoiding its deadly supernatural cycle.

House of the Dragon Season 3 Episode 4 Review: The Tumbleton Diaries

This review contains spoilers for House of the Dragon season 3 episode 4.

One of the most consistently impressive features of George R.R. Martin‘s “A Song of Ice and Fire” canon is that every character within it, no matter how minor, is compelling enough to lead an entire fantasy story of their own.

The example I always like to point to is that of Lord Beric Dondarrion a.k.a. the Lightning Lord in Game of Thrones. Initially introduced as a fringe political figure from one of the Stormlands’ lesser Houses, Beric is given the unenviable task of tracking down and killing the eight-foot-tall, violently insane Gregor “The Mountain That Rides” Clegane. After Gregor inevitably kills Beric, he is accidentally brought back to life by his good friend Thoros of Myr (also a fascinating figure in his own right), who doesn’t realize that his lapsed religion’s arcane funeral rites hold real power. Beric and Thoros establish the Brotherhood Without Banners and protect the smallfolk of the Riverlands all the while Beric keeps dying and being resurrected, each time becoming a lesser version of himself.

While Beric and his unique circumstances could easily fill hundreds of pages of fantasy storytelling, he is a relatively unimportant figure in Martin’s book series and quite far down the call sheet of its TV adaptation. Still, what the saga of Beric, Thoros, and their Brotherhood Without Banners reveals is that there’s no such thing as an inconsequential or uninteresting character in this universe. Every soul is the hero of their own story, patiently waiting for the larger narrative to find them.

In House of the Dragon season 3 episode 4 that larger narrative finally finds Lord Ormund Hightower (James Norton). Unlike the previous installment, which almost entirely restricted itself to Queen Rhaenyra’s (Emma D’Arcy) point of view, this week’s episode isn’t solely the Lord Ormund Show. There’s plenty else going on here from Larys (Matthew Needham) and Aegon’s (Tom Glynn-Carney) misadventures in the Crownlands, to Daemon’s (Matt Smith) misadventures in the Vale, to Criston (Fabien Frankel) and Gwayne’s (Freddie Fox) misadventures in the Riverlands (a lot of misadventures going on around Westeros right now it turns out). But it’s through Ormund’s eyes that the episode both begins and ends. And in-between those moments, Ormund establishes himself as one of the show’s most dynamic figures yet.

Things begin in the humble Reach hamlet of Tumbleton where the odor-averse Lord of Oldtown is taking a leisurely bath in House Footly’s chambers. When Lady Footly complains of Lord Ormund making himself at home, he stands up, revealing the Hightower between his legs to all and making his priorities clear: “My purpose is to restore the rightful line to the Iron Throne.” It’s not unusual for the powerful folks of Westeros to speak so definitively and with such clarity of purpose. It is, however, a little unusual for them to lie so brazenly when doing so.

For, as the episode’s conclusion reveals, Ormund isn’t concerned with merely restoring the rightful line to the Iron Throne, he’s concerned with restoring one very particular branch of that line to the Iron Throne in the form of his nephew Daeron (Benjamin Evan Ainsworth). Ormund’s ruse involving a lowborn boy with dyed platinum hair wasn’t just to stymie the Blacks’ efforts to consolidate control of the Seven Kingdoms, it was a crucial part of his larger plan to “break the wheel” a la Daenerys Targaryen some 200 years later.

The realm has had plenty of Targaryen kings. It has not yet had a Hightower-Targaryen king. What’s more: it has not had a Hightower-Targaryen king raised by the great Lord Ormund Hightower himself. Our boy is freelancing. As Grand Maester Orwylve’s scouting report to Rhaenyra surmise later “I suppose only that Lord Ormund ruled Oldtown as a kingdom unto itself.” Well, that would certainly explain why Ser Otto’s letters to Oldtown went unanswered… and why we got a split second view of Otto imprisoned among the Hightower host last season.

None of this is – say it with me now – explicit in Martin’s Fire & Blood source material. But like Paddy Considine’s brilliant depiction of King Viserys I, it’s another example of House of the Dragon showrunner Ryan Condal and his team uncovering some captivating character traits in the margins of (fake) history. Why wouldn’t Lord Ormund want his pseudo-son to sit the Iron Throne? Why wouldn’t he see himself as a scholarly raconteur despite frequently demonstrating blinding rage? And why wouldn’t he have an inexplicably sensitive nose? Those are all human traits and Lord Ormund, as brought to life by James Norton, is human.

Also human are the poor inhabitants of Tumbleton trying to go about their days and avoid a civil war that has now found its way to their doorstep. While the show’s decision to place Hugh Hammer’s (Kieran Bew) wife in the line of fire is a bit on the nose and geographically dubious (the town is close enough to King’s Landing but a bit off the beaten Roseroad), getting to see what a military occupation looks like from the ground up is satisfying new ground for this franchise.

Left defenseless without the awe-inspiring power of the Third Amendment, the Tumbletonians are forced to quarter Hightower soldiers in their homes. And, like most other things in Westeros, this leads to sexual violence. Ormund’s response to one of his men’s crimes is telling. Though he haughtily tells Daeron that “when dealing with those beneath you, you must be fair but firm,” Ormund’s solution of gelding one guy does little to solve the larger tensions at play.

The soldiers stay quartered and the smallfolk stay vulnerable, setting the stage for a level of chaos and discontent that Hugh and Ulf the White’s (Tom Bennett) arrival on dragonback will do little to quell. Hugh may ultimately come to have an interesting interpretation of Rhaenyra’s orders to sit back and observe. After all, broad applications of the Queen’s words appear to be in vogue as the City Watch of King’s Landing interpret “please clean up this graffiti” as “indiscriminately kill a bunch of folks standing around the graffiti.”

The nobles’ inability to recognize the people beneath them as people is something of a recurring theme in this episode and the series overall. Nowhere is that more apparent than in Larys Strong and the absent King Aegon II’s journey through the Crownlands. As a lifelong underdog, Larys knows how to deal with others who have the audacity to think him their equal. One day you’re the master of whisperers at court, the next day some filthy transient is charging your travel companion a penny to touch his own dragon. What are you gonna do other than give him the penny and go on your way?

For Aegon, of course, it’s not so simple. The notion that another human being could compel him to do anything he didn’t want to do is as foreign to him as the possibility of flying Sunfyre to the moon. His inability to blend in as part of Ser Criston’s lost garrison at the ruins of Rook’s Rest ends with him kissing a very disgusting boot. Aegon, Second of His Name, is one of Westerosi history’s main characters. But for at least one afternoon he’s a footnote in one lowborn dickhead’s dominion over a very small parcel of land.

That fate of that aforementioned Rook’s Rest dickhead (who I believe is called “Janos,” presumably no relation to the similarly dickish Janos Slynt two centuries later) very well could have been the same of the anonymous sheepherder in the Vale who Daemon torches and frames as Sheepstealer’s rider to keep Rhaenyra from knowing the awful truth about Rhaena (Phoebe Campbell). Yes, it’s time already for this week’s #NettlesWatch, in which we examine how the biggest and most controversial change from Martin’s text is progressing.

For what it’s worth, House of the Dragon‘s gradual transformation of Rhaena into an entirely unrelated character continues to make more logical sense from week to week. HBO’s budget for the show, though surely generous, still couldn’t fully support the Dance of the Dragons’ expansive roster of combatants. Synthesizing Rhaena and Nettles into one plot not only makes sense from a financial perspective, it also adds some more skin in the game for both Daemon and Rhaena’s sister Baela (Bethany Antonia).

While that all may be true, there is still something so…off about Rhaena’s self-exile with Sheepstealer. I don’t want to lay blame at any singular party, least of all actor Phoebe Campbell who is finding some believable desperation within their character. But there’s something about the presence of Rhaena Targaryen that makes House of the Dragon forget how to be a TV show. The staging is boring, the dialogue uninspiring, and even the costuming unbelievable, with Rhaena appearing to sport cave pajamas from the “Tastefully Tattered Robe Emporium” or something. Some of those problems begin to infect the scenes around them with Daemon’s return to King’s Landing and fevered insistence that he found Jace’s killer coming across as slapstick. Though Mysaria’s casual “whose head is that?” cut to Daemon is tremendously funny.

Elsewhere in King’s Landing, Rhaenyra’s reign begins to stabilize a bit after its inauspicious beginnings. She stays true to her word to Alicent, making sure that Otto’s body is sent off to Oldtown and even begins to assemble a new small council, selecting Torrhen Manderly (Dan Fogler) as her new master of coin (a.k.a. scapegoat for the crown’s money issues) and accepting Alyn Velaryon (Abubakar Salim) as Hand of the Queen in his irate father’s stead.

Still, the problems with the Faith of the Seven aren’t going away and the smallfolk are getting restless, as evidenced by the treasonous messages scribbled around the capital. Rhaenyra’s responses to these burgeoning crises – inquiring about House Hightower’s involvement in the church and being rude to Ulf – offer little hope that she’ll ultimately be able to solve them… even if she’s sure she will.

That’s the thing about a fantasy universe full of characters who believe they are heroes of their own story: somebody still has to win.

New episodes of House of the Dragon season 3 premiere Sundays at 9 p.m. ET on HBO and HBO Max, culminating with the finale on August 9.

My Adventures with Superman Proves that the Death of Superman Was More Than a Sales Stunt

This article contains spoilers for My Adventures with Superman season 3 episode 5.

The fifth episode of My Adventures with Superman‘s third season makes its aims known right at the start. The episode begins with a title screen that displays the words “The Death of Superman,” with blood dripping down the iconic “S” shield. Even those who weren’t reading comics back in 1992 recognize the iconography. DC heavily promoted the storyline that saw Superman sacrifice himself to stop the monstrous Doomsday, so that newspapers, local broadcasts, and mainstream magazines disseminated the picture.

As one would expect, My Adventures With Superman takes a unique approach to the story. As in the comic, jealousy drives astronaut Hank Henshaw to become the Cyborg Superman, and Superman gets help from Superboy to stop him. But the cartoon skips over Doomsday entirely in this telling, leaves Steel off the board, and only gestures toward the Eradicator in Henshaw’s design. By playing with the concept while changing even important details, My Adventures With Superman shows that The Death of Superman has transcended its original intentions to be a defining quality of the Man of Steel as a character.

The Death of Superman stems from a problem faced by the editors in DC Comics’s Superman division back in the early ’90s. They may be in charge of the first and most important superhero, but he was also a superhero that had grown unfashionable.

The ABC series Lois & Clark: The New Adventures of Superman gave the Man of Steel a hip prime-time makeover, with Teri Hatcher playing a modern Lois Lane and a then-unproblematic Dean Cain as a Clark Kent who shopped at Mervyn’s. DC Comics had postponed its plans to join Lois and Clark in holy matrimony until the TV show counterparts did the same, hoping to generate some synergistic buzz. But nothing worked, and Superman comic sales sagged, so writer Jerry Ordway proposed drastic measures: “Why don’t we just kill him?”

Even back when Superman finally died fighting the monster Doomsday in 1992’s Superman #25, nobody thought it would last. The Death of Superman immediately gave way to Funeral For a Friend, which in turn led into Reign of the Superman. By the time that story closed in October of 1993, the original Superman was back, albeit with a period-appropriate mullet. More importantly, from DC’s standpoint, the readers were back, and Superman comics spiked in sales.

Such stunts are hardly new to comics. The first company-wide crossover (something discussed in this week’s comics newsletter), Marvel Super Heroes Secret Wars, was designed explicitly to help sell action figures. Characters are redesigned and changed to match the actors who play them in film and television, as seen when Marvel changed Nick Fury from a grizzled old white guy to a hip bald Black man or Agatha Harkness was transformed from a crone to a sassy middle-aged woman. And The Death of Superman worked so well that DC started killing or removing all of its major characters to replace them with different versions: Batman‘s back was broken, Green Lantern turned evil, Artemis became the new Wonder Woman, and Green Arrow blew up in a plane.

In short, these are cash grabs, marketing techniques driving stories. But My Adventures with Superman proves that it’s not all they are. However craven the original intentions, these stories have sparked something in the audience, making them worthy of revisiting and adapting.

My Adventures With Superman is a perfect example. In the show’s telling, the battle is about who belongs on Earth: The foreigner Superman? Or the human Hank Henshaw?

The fight speaks to our time, when xenophobia and nationalism have been encouraged and legitimatized by those in power, while staying true to Superman’s core as an immigrant story. By swapping the clone Superboy of the original story with the modern Superboy Jon Kent, the son of Clark and Lois, the story also becomes about overcoming fear, letting the next generation succeed you, and fighting for a better tomorrow.

My Adventures with Superman is hardly the only series to revisit The Death of Superman. In addition to various animated movies that adapted the story, it appears in season eight of Smallville, the Justice League cartoon episode “Hereafter,” Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice and Justice League (both the Joss Whedon and Zack Snyder varieties), the CW Crisis on Infinite Earths crossover, and the third and fourth seasons of Superman & Lois. Infamously, it was going to be the main plot in the Tim Burton-helmed, Nicolas Cage-starring Superman Lives. And even the comics have revisited the storyline, most famously in the way it killed off the New 52 Superman.

Why do storytellers keep coming back to The Death of Superman? It’s not to boost sales or ratings anymore. Instead, it’s because the story gets at the fundamental truth of Superman. He’s good not because he’s the strongest or because he’s got nothing to fear. He’s good because he wants to help and protect others, even when those powers fail him. He continues to stand by his values and save other people, to the moment of his death. And, like all great fantasies, not even death is the end, as the story always ends with Superman coming back to life to continue his never-ending battle.

My Adventures With Superman recreates those principles in its unique, anime-influenced style. And even though the episode ends with Superman revealing that his powers are gone, the blue electricity manifested during the fight with Henshaw suggests that another big change is coming, one that also stems from a comic book story intended to spike sales… but that’s a story for another time.

My Adventures with Superman releases new episodes every Saturday at midnight on Adult Swim and HBO Max.

Batman Fans Prepared Christopher Nolan for Criticism of The Odyssey

The Odyssey is one of the most important works of Western Literature. For centuries, Homer’s epic has shaped the way we think about fundamental concepts such as duty and hospitality. Its depiction of the cunning Odysseus has influenced heroes from Sherlock Holmes to Superman. Countless of people have studied The Odyssey closely, have built their lives around it, and even more have heard and enjoyed it time and again. And yet, devotees of The Odyssey have nothing on Bat-fans.

When asked by The Telegrah about the various online critiques leveled at his upcoming film, director Christopher Nolan puts things in perspective. “I spent 10 years of my life dealing with Batman,” he points out. “When I came on to Batman Begins, writers and artists had been working on this beloved character for almost 65 years, and a lot of freighted thoughts were out there about what he represents.”

Even though The Odyssey still doesn’t release in theaters for another week, and even though there have been precious few adaptations of the story, and certainly none on a Hollywood blockbuster scale, commentators online have had strong opinions about the story. Perhaps the most gentle and reasonable critique came with the first images, when a Twitter user noted that the helmet worn by Matt Damon differs from the one described in the text.

However, since then, reactions have only grown more unhinged. People complain that Nolan has cast Elliot Page, a celebrated actor with whom he worked on Inception, because Page is trans. Others have grouched about Nolan casting rapper and actor Travis Scott, a man famous for his ability to tell stories in rhyme, as a bard. Most ludicrously of all, commentators were infuriated that Academy Award-winning actress, polyglot, and international model Lupita Nyong’o would play the face that launched a thousand ships, Helen of Troy.

These absurd complaints pale in comparison to the more reasonable knocks against Nolan’s Batman work. Leaving aside problems with The Dark Knight‘s final 20 minutes or the death of Talia in The Dark Knight Rises, fans took issue with the way Nolan altered long-established characters. He turned Bane from a South American mastermind into a thug with a non-distinct accent. The Lazarus Pit that resurrected Ra’s al Ghul time and again was replaced with a succession plan that allowed both Ken Watanabe and Liam Neeson to portray the character. And he cast a pretty-boy teen idol Heath Ledger to play the Joker, a decision that infuriated fans at the time, hard as it is to believe today.

But Nolan has the right attitude to dealing with these things. Batman stories have been told by hundreds of creators over decades, in every imaginable medium for a range of audiences. Bruce Wayne and his allies and rogues have never been one thing. The same is true of The Odyssey which was an imaginative work of historical fiction at the time it was new. “[Homer] and his audience were looking back centuries at what they viewed as a superior civilisation, this long-past Age of Heroes, and there had been this social and cultural collapse in between,” Nolan points out.

“What I learnt over my time on [the Dark Knight] trilogy is you can’t worry about any of that at all,” Nolan states. “What you have to do is honour the original text by interpreting it in the strongest way you personally can.” And if people don’t like it, well, they’ll get over the next time someone lights the bat-signal wrong and they can complain about that instead.

The Odyssey arrives in theaters on July 17, 2026.

Evil Dead Burn Proves That the Franchise Needs More Comedy

This article contains full spoilers for Evil Dead Burn.

About halfway through Evil Dead Burn, Bruce Campbell finally makes an appearance. No, he’s not there in person, nor does he seem to be playing Ashley Williams, the put-upon protagonist of the first three Evil Dead films. Instead, we just see his portrait on a wall as the camera pans to follow grandmother Polly (Maude Davey) as she rides her wheelchair elevator up the stairs.

Fittingly, Bruce’s appearance coincides with one of the few moments of levity in Evil Dead Burn. For most of its runtime, Evil Dead Burn follows the model set by Fede Álvarez‘s 2013 remake of The Evil Dead, as does Lee Cronin‘s 2023 follow-up Evil Dead Rise. These movies set out to challenge their audience, daring viewers to endure their grueling story beats and unrepentant nastiness. There’s nothing inherently wrong with this approach and even Burn, easily the weakest of the three, has its good qualities. But for as much as these movies pay deference to the original films by Sam Raimi, they do lack the humor that once made Evil Dead so special.

The Birth of Evil

Really, it’s all the fault of The Evil Dead from 1981. While most prefer Evil Dead II to its original, and as much as the 1987 second movie is essentially a remake of the first, The Evil Dead is a nasty movie. Shot for just $90,000, which Raimi and producer Robert Tapert raised from Detroit-area businessmen, The Evil Dead sets the premise that each subsequent movie (with the exception of Army of Darkness) will follow: a small group of people goes to a remote location, accidentally reads from the Necronomicon Ex-Mortis, and unleashes demons called Deadites, who torment them through the night.

In The Evil Dead, that group consists of friends studying at Michigan State University, including Campbell’s Ash. After Scott (Hal Delrich) reads from the Necronomicon, Ash’s sister Cheryl (Ellen Sandweiss) runs into the woods and gets sexually assaulted by the trees. From there, the Deadites use Cheryl and the rest of Ash’s friends to torture him, doing everything from stabbing him in the leg with a pencil to forcing him to decapitate his would-be betrothed Linda (Betsy Baker) with a shovel.

Raimi plays none of this for laughs. He uses his manic camera movements to make the characters seem as if they’re constantly under attack, and asks Campbell to play Ash’s emotional trauma without a smirk. But the camaraderie between Raimi and Campbell, and especially the former’s puckish spirit, still shines through. So by the time the duo remakes the first for Evil Dead II, the slapstick gags and Campbell’s hammier take on Ash feels less like a course correction from the first film and more like it’s accentuating what is already there.

Of course, humor becomes the driving force in the 1993 sequel Army of Darkness and the TV series Ash vs. Evil Dead, which ran for three seasons between 2015 and 2018. Those works turn Ash into a lovable blowhard, a gigantic doofus who tosses off one-liners with all the confidence in the world, despite just barely surviving each encounter with Deadites.

No Laughing Matter

Comedy came to so define the Evil Dead franchise that it felt like breath of fresh air when Fede Álvarez remade The Evil Dead in 2013. He and co-writer Rodo Sayagues seemed to be recovering something lost in the franchise, restoring all of the nastiness that Raimi and Campbell had left behind. Moreover, Álvarez and Sayagues added a level of thematic depth, making the MSU students go to a secluded cabin to help Mia (Jane Levy) overcome her drug addiction. The punishing visuals get so excessive, climaxing with gallons of blood poured on Mia, who must sever her own arm to survive, that it felt like the spirit of Raimi remained in the work, even if the humor was gone.

Lee Cronin moved his movie from a cabin in the woods to a metropolitan apartment for Evil Dead Rise, but he followed in the footsteps of Álvarez and Sayagues. By focusing on a fractured family brought back together, Cronin used the Deadites to explore the unspoken hurt feelings between people who love one another, adding more thematic weight to the franchise. Evil Dead Rise has just as many extreme moments as its predecessor, including needles and a cheese grater, but save for some character-driven reaction shots, it lacks humor.

This is where Evil Dead Burn swerves from the previous two movies, but only a little. French director Sébastien Vaniček, who co-wrote the script with Florent Bernard, imports much of his homeland’s New Extremity movement of the 2000s, crafting stomach-churning scenes involving a pen in the ear and the grossest possible example of parents kissing. It uses the Deadites as a metaphor as well, as protagonist Alice (Souheila Yacoub) must spend time with her cruel in-laws after the death of her abusive husband Will (George Pullar), in-laws who become Deadites.

Nasty and heavy as the movie often is, Evil Dead Burn does find moments for humor. The opening scene whip pans from the Deadite Jessica (Anna-Maree Thomas) stepping on the hand of a person she boiled alive to a hard cut to a woman’s butt shaking at Will’s restaurant. The jokes made at the expense of Polly’s dementia may be tasteless, but they are jokes, even if it’s just the asides she mutters to herself as the world around her gets increasingly strange. In perhaps the best scene, the Deadite Thya (Luciane Buchanan) pulls out Polly’s false teeth, slurps on them a bit, and then returns them to the older woman’s mouth. It’s so uncomfortable and strange that the audience can’t help but laugh, despite how icky the whole thing is.

Great as the bit in Burn is, it also reminds us that such weird jokes regularly appeared in Evil Dead movies, back when they could be more than just dire gorefests.

More Than Gore

Again, there’s nothing inherently wrong with a dire gorefest. All three later Evil Dead films have instances of top-quality filmmaking, and there’s clearly an audience for nasty, mean-spirited cinema. But as anyone who has seen a Rob Zombie picture can tell you, it doesn’t take a lot of skill to be nasty. All one need do is throw the unthinkable on screen, and that’s enough to make the audience cringe. In some cases, they’ll look away from the screen so hard, be so viscerally affected by the mere idea of what’s happening, that they won’t notice how poorly the idea is executed. The inference of effect exists without any cinematic cause.

Contrast that to the predecessor to the false teeth bit in Evil Dead Burns. In Evil Dead II, when an eyeball pops out of the Deadite Henrietta and lands in the mouth of Bobby Joe (Kassie Wesley). Gross as the scene gets, it also comes directly from The Three Stooges, and has a vaudevillian sense of showmanship that keeps us watching, despite the ick. We laugh and shudder at the same time, in part because we cannot look away.

Such moments used to regularly occur in Evil Dead films, but rarely happened in even quality horror comedies, which set the franchise apart from its contemporaries. For all they do well, the modern Evil Dead movies don’t offer too much that can’t be found in other recent nasty films. To make Evil Dead films special once again, the modern entries need to put some humor back into the mix, just like Grandpa Bruce used to make them.

Evil Dead Burns is now playing in theaters worldwide.

House of the Dragon Season 3 Is Therapeutic for Game of Thrones Fans

This article contains spoilers for the first three episodes of House of the Dragon Season 3.

It was never going to be easy. Right down to its last crimson-stained step, Rhaenyra Targaryen’s journey to the Iron Throne—a seat which according to the oath every great house in Westeros swore was hers by rights—could never be anything less than a bloodbath. The lords, armies, and especially a fractured Targaryen family insisted upon it, snuffing out whatever luminescence likely remained in the Realm’s Delight before she claimed her father’s chair.

Yet in the second episode of House of the Dragon’s third season, claim it she did in a sequence that was so immediately gratifying for longtime fans of Westeros, Game of Thrones, and the wider world of George R.R. Martin, that it did the rare thing for a television show in the 2020s: it broke through the pop culture white noise to be a genuine watercooler moment toasted by memes and reported as alleged news on pop culture social media channels. Obviously the latter bit was done with its tongue in cheek, but it reflected a catharsis that was palpable both on and off the screen.

In the context of the TV show, it’s the transgression House of the Dragon has been building to ever since a 2022 cold open staged the Great Council of Harrenhal, a political summit wherein all the noble houses of Westeros came together and forcefully declared that no woman should ever sit the Iron Throne. Despite Rhaenyra and her father King Viserys attempting to reverse that precedent a scant decade and change later, it probably was inevitable that for Rhaenyra to succeed Papa Viserys, she’d have to wade through a pool of blood. Albeit, one imagines Ser Otto Hightower, Viserys’ scheming and manipulative second-in-command, never entertained it would be literally his own that she’d make tracks in on the fateful day.

For the audience at home, however, the wait was almost as long when you factor in the time since the original Game of Thrones season 1 promo premiered more than 15 years ago in 2010. Aye, that was the first and last time viewers ever saw Emilia Clarke’s Daenerys Targaryen in the same seat now claimed by her direct ancestor Rhaenyra in House of the Dragon. Granted, that brilliant piece of early Game of Thrones marketing showed a lot of possible futures for Westeros, both likely (look out for Cersei Lannister in her husband and sons’ chair!) and impossible (sorry, Robb Stark stans).

But the image of Dany on the Iron Throne stuck in the cultural imagination for the entire run of Game of Thrones, with the character becoming something of a pop icon who transcended the textual narrative of her series to become a metatextual idol. One imagines many viewers in the 2010s were so swept up in the hype and majestic trappings of Dany’s stylings—Mother of (Cinematic) Dragons, Breaker of Chains, Fashionista of Meereen—that they likely missed the telltale signs and heavy foreshadowing of a possible fall from grace.

Yet for so much of Game of Thrones’ run, that is all they were. Hinted at and teased shadows on the wall of one possible future for Dany. When it actually came time for that original series to lay its cards on the table and reveal Dany’s tragic fate to die mere feet from her family’s reclaimed seat of power, and then only to be slaughtered a tyrant, the execution was near as catastrophic as Dany’s final choices to raze King’s Landing.

There was always the possibility Dany would indulge her dynastic instincts, but they were superseded by the qualities that made her such a compelling leader to so many viewers: her sense of sweeping vision, compassion for the weak and vulnerable, and her demands for justice. In the final three episodes of Game of Thrones, though, the series infamously rushed what is meant to be a tragic hero’s final descent into, ultimately, “Dragon Lady got too emotional and did an oopsie.” And then, in the epicenter of her family’s legacy, Dany could only just touch her father’s chair, brushing her fingers over what was supposed to be her birthright, before it and everything else was taken from her in a treacherous red gush.

Deserved or not in the context of the series, this released in the grander cultural landscape of a world not yet three years removed from the 2016 U.S. presidential election. And it all amounted to yet another woman being declared mad and denied even the opportunity of even attempting national power. And they called it justice.

So the sight of Rhaenyra Targaryen sitting the Iron Throne is its own kind of therapeutic healing. After being teased a Targaryen restoration for nine years in Game of Thrones before it was as rudely (and clumsily) snatched away, the ostensible heroine of House of the Dragon claimed a seat that was far more her own. Unlike Dany, Rhaenyra is the eldest child of the last uncontested ruler, her father King Viserys. Yet due to Viserys’ own ineptitude and fecklessness as a monarch, and the scheming treachery of the men on his Small Council and the wife in his bed—plus, to be honest, Rhaenyra’s own shortsighted choice to brood far from court on Dragonstone while the Queen Mother and Rhaenyra’s half-brother plotted—her rule was usurped. Her opportunity to govern was stolen.

There is thus great catharsis, indeed, in Rhaenyra finally sitting in that chair. But also for the writers of House of the Dragon, opportunity as well to expand on George R.R. Martin’s larger thesis about the inherent unreliability of rulers and those who seek power, even sympathetic ones who do so out of a sense of fairness.

While House of the Dragon has at this point infamously made more changes than Martin likes, writer Sarah Hess in particular has zeroed in on both Rhaenyra’s vulnerabilities and her blindspots in a way that can continue the Dance past Rhaenyra’s ascent. Even the way Rhaenyra haphazardly beheads her late father’s best friend sows seeds of danger. Viewers can rationalize a scene by considering the sorrow a woman would feel after just losing her third child in this war over her sex, just as we know the emotional knots that would come with condemning a paternal figure from your youth, even a duplicitous and treasonous one. But in a feudal and highly patriarchal society, her shaky swings of a sword between teardrops will read as weakness.

And in any context, Rhaenyra’s complacent trivializing of the requests of Corlys Velaryon—a staunch ally who has given Rhaenyra’s claim everything over the past 20 years and now asks her only to legitimize bastard sons who already demonstrated fierce loyalty—is arrogant and, again, shortsighted.

Similarly, it is easy for viewers to cheer on a self-styled Queen of the People humiliating and demoralizing the wealthy elite of King’s Landing by serving them a dinner of rats, but any passing study of history shows the danger of alienating the ruling class. Taxing their assets during a time of want and war? Necessary. Heroic, even. Taxing their pride and self-regard? Unnecessarily risky.

By taking the extra time to really wallow in the satisfaction, and also the agonies, of the character you root for getting everything she wants, House of the Dragon is taking the opportunity to explore the nuance—and mayhaps the tragedy—Game of Thrones so hurriedly stumbled through and threw away.

House of the Dragon is playing on HBO now.

15 Celebs With Some Real Big-Time Brains

Celebrities have lives that are as complex as that of any human being, making them more than just what they are famous for. Other than their fame, several stars earned prestigious degrees, excelled in demanding academic fields, or built impressive résumés outside the entertainment industry.

Their fame tends to overshadow their academic backgrounds, yet these celebrities prove that intelligence and star power can go hand in hand. Here are just a few famous faces whose educational credentials and accomplishments show they have plenty of brains to match their talent.

IMDb

Mayim Bialik

Long before playing neuroscientist Amy Farrah Fowler on The Big Bang Theory, Mayim Bialik earned a Ph.D. in neuroscience from the University of California, Los Angeles, with research focusing on obsessive-compulsive disorder in adolescents.

IMDb

Brian May

While famous as Queen’s legendary guitarist, Brian May also earned a Ph.D. in astrophysics from Imperial College London. He completed the degree decades after pausing his studies to pursue one of rock’s greatest careers.

IMDb

Ken Jeong

Before becoming a comedian and actor, Ken Jeong earned his M.D. from the University of North Carolina School of Medicine. He completed a residency in internal medicine and practiced as a licensed physician before acting full-time.

IMDb

Dolph Lundgren

Action star Dolph Lundgren holds a degree in chemical engineering from the Royal Institute of Technology in Sweden and received a Fulbright Scholarship to study chemical engineering at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology before choosing acting.

IMDb

Natalie Portman

Natalie Portman graduated from Harvard University with a bachelor’s degree in psychology while continuing her acting career. She has also co-authored scientific research and spoken openly about prioritizing education alongside Hollywood success.

IMDb

Rowan Atkinson

Best known as Mr. Bean, Rowan Atkinson earned a master’s degree in electrical engineering from The Queen’s College, Oxford. His technical background contrasts sharply with the delightfully clueless characters that made him internationally famous.

IMDb

Lisa Kudrow

Before finding fame on Friends, Lisa Kudrow earned a biology degree from Vassar College. She even worked with her father, a physician and headache specialist, on medical research before pursuing acting.

IMDb

Cindy Crawford

Cindy Crawford was valedictorian of her high school class and earned an academic scholarship to Northwestern University to study chemical engineering. She left to pursue modeling but has often spoken about the importance of education.

IMDb

James Franco

James Franco became known almost as much for attending university as for acting. He earned degrees from UCLA, Columbia University, Brooklyn College, and Yale while studying subjects ranging from creative writing to filmmaking.

IMDb

David Duchovny

David Duchovny graduated from Princeton University with a degree in English literature before earning a master’s from Yale University. He was pursuing a Ph.D. when acting opportunities led him away from academia.

IMDb

Jodie Foster

Jodie Foster graduated magna c laude from Yale University with a degree in literature. Fluent in French, she has also served as a translator and frequently conducts interviews in multiple languages.

IMDb

Geena Davis

Geena Davis earned a bachelor’s degree in drama from Boston University, but her achievements extend further. She later founded the Geena Davis Institute on Gender in Media, which researches representation in entertainment using data-driven analysis.

IMDb

Shaquille O’Neal

Although primarily known for basketball, Shaquille O’Neal has steadily pursued higher education. He earned a doctoral degree in education from Barry University, demonstrating a long-term commitment to learning after his NBA career began.

IMDb

John Legend

John Legend graduated magna cum laude from the University of Pennsylvania with a degree in English and an emphasis on African American literature. He completed his studies before launching his award-winning music career.

IMDb

Emma Watson

Emma Watson balanced a demanding film career with higher education, graduating from Brown University with a bachelor’s degree in English literature. She completed her studies while filming major projects and later became a prominent advocate for education and gender equality.

15 of the Funniest Gags from the Austin Powers Franchise

Mike Myers’ Austin Powers movies became comedy staples by spoofing spy films, swinging-’60s culture, and blockbuster sequels all at once. The franchise mixed outrageous visual gags, ridiculous villains, and endlessly quotable dialogue into a style that felt both goofy and surprisingly clever.

Many of its funniest moments come from jokes that escalate far beyond where they logically should, whether it’s a tiny misunderstanding turning into a massive scene or a simple sight gag becoming comedy gold. These are some of the franchise’s most memorable laughs that fans still quote decades later.

IMDb

The Never-Ending Hallway Turn

In Austin Powers: International Man of Mystery, Austin gets trapped trying to turn a luggage cart in a narrow hallway. The joke keeps escalating as he repeatedly reverses and crashes instead of simply getting out.

IMDb

Dr. Evil Wants One Million Dollars

Fresh from decades of cryogenic freezing, Dr. Evil demands “one million dollars” as ransom. His organization reacts with confusion because the amount sounds laughably small by modern standards.

IMDb

The Steamroller That Takes Forever

A guard screams in terror as a painfully slow steamroller inches toward him. The absurdly long buildup makes the eventual impact far funnier than a quick gag ever could.

IMDb

Austin’s Awkward Medical Exam

After being thawed out, Austin undergoes a medical checkup while making increasingly inappropriate comments. The scene perfectly establishes how hilariously out of place he is in the 1990s.

IMDb

The Mole Obsession

Dr. Evil becomes fixated on a henchman’s facial mole, repeatedly interrupting serious business to comment on it. The running gag grows funnier because nobody else knows how to respond.

IMDb

Mini-Me’s Silent Attitude

Mini-Me barely speaks, yet constantly steals scenes through exaggerated reactions and tiny acts of aggression. His deadpan presence becomes one of the franchise’s most reliable comedy weapons.

IMDb

The Swedish Enlarger Pump

Austin insists a suspicious-looking device is “not mine” while explaining it’s a Swedish “enlarger” pump. The increasingly desperate denial turns an already ridiculous prop into a classic gag.

IMDb

Fat Bastard’s Introductions

Fat Bastard repeatedly introduces himself with outrageous confidence and crude jokes. His shameless self-description became one of the most quoted recurring bits in the entire franchise.

IMDb

The Zip-It Scene

Dr. Evil repeatedly tells Scott to “zip it” during family arguments. Their dysfunctional father-son dynamic hilariously clashes with the fact that one of them is trying to conquer the world.

IMDb

Austin Mistakes a Robot for a Real Person

In Austin Powers: The Spy Who Shagged Me, Austin mourns a robot guard he just destroyed, imagining a tragic family life for the machine. The over-the-top guilt makes the scene unforgettable.

IMDb

The Tent Shadow Illusion

Silhouettes behind a tent make innocent actions look wildly inappropriate. The joke relies entirely on visual misunderstanding, and the escalating reactions from onlookers sell every second.

IMDb

Dr. Evil Joins a Therapy Group

Dr. Evil attends group therapy with other villains and complains about his childhood. Treating supervillains like ordinary patients creates a surprisingly effective parody of self-help culture.

IMDb

Goldmember Loves Gold

In Austin Powers in Goldmember, Goldmember’s obsession with gold extends to his clothes, food, and bizarre personal habits. The character is funny simply because every sentence returns to gold.

IMDb

The Long Urination After Cryogenic Sleep

Austin emerges from cryogenic freezing and immediately needs the bathroom. The scene stretches the obvious joke far beyond normal limits, which is exactly why it works.

IMDb

Dr. Evil’s Ridiculous Family Reveal

The franchise eventually reveals increasingly absurd connections between Austin, Dr. Evil, and other characters. Each sequel adds another layer of ridiculous family history, turning the spy saga into a soap opera.

15 Quick Facts Worth Knowing About the Movie Business

The movie business is far more complex than simply making a film and releasing it in theaters. Behind every blockbuster or indie hit is a network of financing, distribution, marketing, contracts, and audience data that determines whether a project succeeds or disappears without a trace.

While technology and streaming have changed many aspects of the industry, the fundamentals of how movies are funded, sold, and promoted continue to shape what reaches audiences. These few facts offer a glimpse into the business side of filmmaking that most movie fans rarely think about.

IMDb

Marketing Can Match the Production Budget

A major studio film’s marketing campaign can cost as much as its production budget. Advertising, trailers, premieres, television spots, and digital campaigns often require hundreds of millions of dollars for the biggest releases.

IMDb

Opening Weekend Still Matters

Even in the streaming era, a strong opening weekend remains one of Hollywood’s most important performance indicators. Early ticket sales influence media coverage, theater retention, and the perception of a film’s success.

IMDb

Studios Rarely Finance Everything Alone

Large productions are often funded through partnerships involving multiple studios, production companies, and outside investors. Sharing costs also spreads financial risk if a movie underperforms at the box office.

IMDb

Streaming Rights Are Major Revenue Sources

A movie’s financial life doesn’t end after theaters. Licensing films to streaming services, television networks, airlines, and international distributors has become a crucial part of modern studio revenue.

IMDb

Tax Incentives Shape Filming Locations

Many productions shoot in places like Georgia, Canada, Australia, or the United Kingdom because governments offer tax credits and financial incentives that can significantly reduce production costs.

IMDb

Theatrical Windows Are Much Shorter

Exclusive theatrical releases once lasted several months. Today, many films become available digitally within weeks of their cinema debut, reflecting changing audience habits and studio distribution strategies.

IMDb

Test Screenings Influence Final Cuts

Studios frequently hold advance screenings for selected audiences before release. Feedback from these previews can lead to edited scenes, altered endings, or pacing changes before the movie reaches theaters.

IMDb

International Box Office Is Essential

For many blockbusters, international audiences generate more revenue than domestic ones. Global appeal now influences casting, storytelling, and release strategies for many big-budget productions.

IMDb

Visual Effects Work Is Often Outsourced

Modern visual effects are commonly divided among multiple specialized companies across different countries. Hundreds or even thousands of artists may contribute to a single film’s finished effects.

IMDb

Product Placement Helps Fund Movies

Brands frequently pay to feature their products in films or provide equipment during production. These partnerships can offset costs while giving companies valuable exposure to worldwide audiences.

IMDb

Completion Bonds Protect Investors

Many major productions purchase completion bonds, which guarantee that a film will be finished even if unexpected financial or production problems arise. They provide reassurance to lenders and investors.

IMDb

Residuals Remain a Major Industry Issue

Actors, writers, and other creative professionals often receive residual payments when projects are rebroadcast or licensed. How those payments apply to streaming platforms has become a significant issue in recent years.

IMDb

Film Festivals Can Launch Distribution Deals

Prestigious festivals such as Sundance, Cannes, and Toronto often serve as marketplaces where distributors purchase completed films. A successful festival premiere can dramatically increase a movie’s commercial prospects.

IMDb

Release Dates Are Carefully Chosen

Studios strategically schedule releases to avoid direct competition or capitalize on holidays and school breaks. Moving a premiere by even one week can significantly affect box office performance.

IMDb

Not Every Movie Turns a Profit

A film can earn hundreds of millions of dollars worldwide and still struggle to become profitable if its production costs, marketing expenses, and distribution fees are exceptionally high. Box office revenue tells only part of the financial story.

15 Celebs With Some Extra-Odd Health, Workout, & Diet Practices

Celebrities often have access to the world’s best trainers, nutritionists, and wellness experts, leading to them often seeking less than conventional advice. Over the years, many stars have shared unusual workout routines, strict diets, and wellness habits that range from quirky to downright bizarre.

No matter if these routines are followed as a law or a pastime, they have sparked debate among health professionals and fans alike. These celebrities have all embraced health practices that stand out from the crowd and keep people talking, but due keep in mind that you shouldn’t try them at home.

IMDb

Mark Wahlberg

Mark Wahlberg famously begins many days before sunrise, often waking around 2:30 or 3:00 a.m. to fit in prayer, multiple workouts, meals, and work commitments before most people are awake.

IMDb

Tom Brady

Although now retired from football, Tom Brady continues promoting the TB12 lifestyle. His diet emphasizes hydration while avoiding foods such as tomatoes, peppers, mushrooms, eggplant, and processed sugar.

IMDb

Madonna

Madonna has long been associated with a macrobiotic-style diet emphasizing vegetables, whole grains, and carefully selected foods. Her disciplined nutritional approach has remained a recurring topic throughout her career.

IMDb

Chris Hemsworth

Chris Hemsworth frequently incorporates cold-water immersion into his recovery routine. He has openly discussed using ice baths to aid muscle recovery and improve resilience following demanding workouts.

IMDb

Shailene Woodley

Shailene Woodley once revealed that she occasionally consumed small amounts of edible clay, saying she learned about the practice from a taxi driver and believed it offered digestive benefits.

IMDb

Gwyneth Paltrow

Gwyneth Paltrow has promoted a variety of alternative wellness practices, including oil pulling, an oral hygiene technique involving swishing oil in the mouth for several minutes before brushing.

IMDb

Zac Efron

For roles like Baywatch, Zac Efron followed exceptionally restrictive diets and intense training. He later explained that maintaining such low body fat year-round was unhealthy and unsustainable.

IMDb

Kourtney Kardashian

Kourtney Kardashian has frequently shared unconventional recipes, including avocado-based puddings and strict organic eating habits. Her wellness routines often prioritize unusual ingredient substitutions over conventional desserts.

IMDb

Joe Rogan

Joe Rogan has publicly experimented with the carnivore diet, temporarily eating almost exclusively meat while documenting both the perceived benefits and unexpected side effects during the self-imposed challenge.

IMDb

Jared Leto

Jared Leto has credited occasional fasting and moderation with helping him maintain his appearance. He has discussed skipping meals at times and embracing simple eating habits rather than constant snacking.

IMDb

Hugh Jackman

To prepare for physically demanding roles, Hugh Jackman has combined intense strength training with intermittent fasting. He timed his meals carefully around workouts to support muscle gain while remaining lean.

IMDb

Jessica Biel

Jessica Biel has joked about and participated in goat yoga, a fitness trend where participants perform yoga while goats wander freely around them, creating a surprisingly challenging and entertaining workout.

IMDb

David Blaine

Magician David Blaine has trained extensively in breath-holding and physiological conditioning to perform endurance stunts. His unusual routines involve techniques more commonly associated with elite free divers than entertainers.

IMDb

Mayim Bialik

Mayim Bialik follows a vegan lifestyle and has long advocated plant-based eating. Her approach combines nutritional choices with broader ethical beliefs, making it a defining part of her public wellness philosophy.

IMDb

Bryan Johnson

Entrepreneur Bryan Johnson follows one of the world’s most publicized longevity routines, involving strict meal timing, constant biometric monitoring, dozens of daily supplements, and carefully measured exercise in pursuit of slowing biological aging.

15 People Share the Movie So Disturbing They Couldn’t Get Through It

There is a time for every hardcore movie fan, particularly during their teen years, where they are dared (by themselves or others) to watch harrowing films. These are movies with subject matters, content, or just vibes that make them near impossible to watch all the way through.

Different users of Reddit came together to share their experiences, including the movies that made them take a break before finishing them, if they finished them at all. Consider this list not a dare for you to follow in their footsteps, but a fair warning to avoid most if not all of these movies.

IMDb

Inside

Part of the New French Extremity movement, Inside has earned a reputation as one of the most intense horror films ever made. Its relentless atmosphere and uncompromising violence have caused countless viewers to abandon it before the credits roll.

IMDb

The Last House on the Left

Wes Craven’s debut remains one of horror’s most controversial films. Its raw filmmaking style and deeply upsetting subject matter continue to make it an exceptionally difficult watch for many audiences.

IMDb

The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo

The original Swedish adaptation of Stieg Larsson’s novel is widely praised for its performances and faithful storytelling. At the same time, its bleak atmosphere and disturbing subject matter make it an emotionally demanding watch that many viewers struggle to finish.

IMDb

The Trials of Gabriel Fernandez

This true crime documentary series chronicles a heartbreaking real-life case that many find emotionally unbearable. Its devastating subject matter makes it one of the most difficult documentaries to watch from beginning to end.

IMDb

Watership Down

Although animated, Watership Down is far from a typical family film. Its surprisingly dark tone and unsettling imagery have traumatized unsuspecting viewers for generations.

IMDb

Threads

This British television film presents the aftermath of nuclear war with chilling realism. Its relentlessly bleak depiction of societal collapse has left many viewers emotionally drained long before the final scene.

IMDb

Salò, or the 120 Days of Sodom

Pier Paolo Pasolini’s controversial drama remains infamous for its shocking content and political themes. Its disturbing imagery has made it one of cinema’s most notoriously difficult films to sit through.

IMDb

I Spit on Your Grave

Known as one of exploitation cinema’s most controversial titles, I Spit on Your Grave pushes audiences with prolonged scenes of brutality that many find too upsetting to continue watching.

IMDb

Cannibal Holocaust

Few horror films have generated as much controversy as Cannibal Holocaust. Its graphic violence, documentary presentation, and inclusion of real animal deaths continue to make it an especially challenging experience.

IMDb

Bone Tomahawk

What begins as a slow-burning western gradually transforms into brutal horror. One particularly infamous sequence has become legendary for catching audiences completely off guard with its graphic violence.

IMDb

Ghosts of Rwanda

This PBS documentary examines the Rwandan genocide through firsthand accounts and historical footage. Its emotionally devastating subject matter makes it an incredibly difficult viewing experience despite its historical importance.

IMDb

A Serbian Film

Few films have achieved the notorious reputation of A Serbian Film. Its deliberately shocking content has made it a benchmark for extreme cinema and one that many viewers simply cannot finish.

IMDb

Free Solo

Not every entry discussed on the thread was horror-themed, as shown by the inclusion of Free Solo. The documentary’s real-life footage of Alex Honnold climbing without ropes creates an overwhelming sense of anxiety that some viewers find physically unbearable.

IMDb

The Impossible

Based on the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami, The Impossible recreates the disaster with remarkable realism. Its relentless tension and emotional intensity can be overwhelming, particularly for viewers affected by real-world tragedies.

IMDb

The Road

Starring Viggo Mortensen, The Road depicts a father and son’s struggle through a post-apocalyptic wasteland. Its crushing atmosphere and persistent sense of hopelessness make it one of the bleakest survival films ever made.

15 Horror Movies Where the ‘Scare’ Hits a Little Too Close to Home

Stories of ghosts, demons, and all kinds of supernatural horrors have their own sense of dread. When used well, they are incredibly effective, although we can always take comfort in the fact that none of that exists. We are safe in our reality.

But what happens when movies depict situations that can potentially happen? The reality you’re living in isn’t as safe anymore, since you don’t know if your neighbour has any ulterior motives for your physical wellbeing. These are the horror movies that, like it or not, are incredibly plausible.

IMDb

The Strangers

A couple’s quiet night turns into a nightmare when masked intruders terrorize them for no apparent reason. The randomness of the attack makes the film especially disturbing, echoing real-life home invasion fears rather than supernatural horror.

IMDb

Funny Games

Two polite young men invade a family’s vacation home and subject them to psychological torture. The film’s greatest horror comes from its realistic violence and the unsettling absence of any larger motive behind the cruelty.

IMDb

Hush

A deaf writer living alone in the woods becomes the target of a masked killer. The film builds suspense from believable circumstances, forcing its protagonist to rely on intelligence instead of impossible action-movie heroics.

IMDb

Green Room

After witnessing a murder backstage at a remote music venue, a punk band is trapped by violent white supremacists. Every escalation feels grounded, making the story’s brutality frighteningly believable.

IMDb

Eden Lake

A weekend getaway spirals into horror after a confrontation with a group of violent teenagers. The film’s realistic setting and plausible chain of events make its relentless tension especially difficult to shake.

IMDb

Creep

A videographer accepts what seems like a simple freelance job in a remote cabin. The increasingly uncomfortable interactions mirror real-world situations where ignoring red flags can have terrifying consequences.

IMDb

The Invitation

A dinner party slowly becomes more unsettling as old friends reunite under unusual circumstances. The horror grows from emotional manipulation and cult psychology rather than supernatural events.

IMDb

The Gift

An unexpected reunion with an old acquaintance gradually exposes buried secrets and growing paranoia. The film demonstrates how unresolved personal history can become frightening without relying on traditional horror tropes.

IMDb

Misery

After a car accident, a novelist is rescued by his self-proclaimed biggest fan. His captor’s obsessive behavior is terrifying precisely because dangerous celebrity fixations have occurred in the real world.

IMDb

The Vanishing

When a woman disappears during a roadside stop, her boyfriend becomes consumed by finding answers. The film’s chilling realism and ordinary setting make its final revelation particularly haunting.

IMDb

Compliance

Based on the real strip-search phone call scam, the film follows employees manipulated into committing disturbing acts by someone falsely claiming to be a police officer. Its events are unsettling because similar crimes actually occurred.

IMDb

Speak No Evil

A family accepts an invitation from friendly vacation acquaintances, only to ignore increasingly alarming behavior out of politeness. The horror stems from the relatable discomfort of avoiding social confrontation for far too long.

IMDb

Watcher

An American woman living abroad becomes convinced someone is following her. The film explores isolation, dismissed concerns, and the fear of not being believed, all within an entirely realistic framework.

IMDb

Vacancy

A stranded couple checks into a remote motel and discovers they are being targeted for snuff films. The isolated location and human perpetrators make the premise far more believable than supernatural horror.

IMDb

The Rental

What begins as a relaxing weekend in a vacation rental turns terrifying when two couples realize someone may be secretly watching them. The film taps into modern anxieties surrounding hidden cameras, privacy, and trusting complete strangers with temporary accommodations.

Buddy: Too Many Cooks Creator Delivers His Horror Take on Barney

It takes a lot to make a stew, or so we were taught by the 2014 viral sensation “Too Many Cooks.” The Adult Swim short took viewers through a genre-bending walk through television history, beginning with the title credits of a TGIF sitcom like Full House, transitioning to a gritty cop show or a ’90s sci-fi program, with plenty of slasher horror in between. With the release of Buddy this August, “Too Many Cooks” creator Casper Kelly hopes to show it doesn’t take much to make a horror movie—it just takes adding a sinister layer to something made for kids.

The first teaser for Buddy mostly consists of grainy footage of a ’90s children’s program, in which the orange unicorn Buddy beckons the viewer closer while kids frolic in the playground behind him. A cheery theme song plays in the background, though occasionally distorted or interrupted by sharp tones, accompanied by images of frightened and mangled kids. A single shot of a concerned woman played by The Penguin‘s Cristin Milioti gives us our one look at the movie’s protagonist Grace, a suburbanite who investigates the truth of Buddy‘s world.

Co-written by Kelly and Jamie King, Buddy co-stars Topher Grace as Grace’s husband, alongside the exact people you’d expect to appear in a horror take on Barney. Keegan-Michael Key voices the central figure, while Patton Oswalt voices a backpack called Strappy, Clint Howard plays the crazy cowboy puppet George, and Michael Shannon does double duty as the voice of a train and a ventriloquist’s dummy.

All of that casting makes sense, as does Kelly’s involvement. Half of the fun of “Too Many Cooks” was, of course, the level of detail that Kelly brought to the material. The other half, of course, was the way he made those elements turn surreal and terrifying. It wasn’t just that a serial killer appeared alongside the ever-expanding cast of the fictional sitcom. It’s that the line between reality and fiction blurred as the characters ran through backlots to hide from the killer, their glowing title credits giving them away.

If Kelly can bring that same approach to Buddy, then he’ll be able to find sublime terror in a kid’s show, while still attending to the details of that show. However, a bigger question remains: can he do that in a way that’s unique and engaging?

Five Nights at Freddy’s came out the same year as “Too Many Cooks,” and has expanded into a multimedia franchise. The 2018 short “The Hug” did it’s own take, while Warner Bros. released The Banana Splits Movie in 2019, another killer kid’s show movie, this time with officially-licensed characters from that show. Even the Terrifier franchise got in on the act, with an extended kid’s program sequence in the second movie. As of this writing, Daniel Kaluuya and Ayo Edebiri are making an official Barney movie for A24, which may have horror elements, or may be a more dramatic take on the material, like 2017’s Brigsby Bear.

With so many similar works already out there, can Buddy stand out? After all, too many cooks can spoil the broth.

Buddy releases in theaters on August 28, 2026.

Godzilla Minus Zero Teaser Returns to the Franchise’s Central Moral

For decades, Godzilla movies have been about one thing: people in giant rubber monster costumes stomping around tiny little sets. Especially in America, where the films that Toho made for its native Japan were imported as badly dubbed B-movies, Godzilla felt more like Saturday morning escapism than proper art. Of course, we all knew that the original film from 1954 was a response to the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. And entries such as Godzilla 1985 and, more recently, Shin Godzilla and Godzilla Minus One wrapped rich social themes around the central kaiju. But there was always a sense of fun and adventure, even in these outings.

The first teaser for the much-anticipated sequel Godzilla Minus Zero suggests that playtime is over, and it’s time to get back to the central question that launched the franchise: how do we live in a world with atomic weapons? In the short teaser, we see two of our main characters from the first film, Kōichi Shikishima (Ryunosuke Kamiki) and Kenji Noda (Hidetaka Yoshioka), arguing over the decision to drop an atomic bomb. “Our Crime and Punishment,” reads the on-screen text. “Returning to Zero Is Not an Option.” A bomb drops, and Godzilla arises again, letting loose his signiture roar.

From the few minutes of footage shown, we can guess that Godzilla Minus Zero will see Japan consider using atomic weapons to destroy Godzilla, despite the fact that such weaponry created the King of the Monsters in the first place. Such a plot would be in keeping with the themes of Godzilla Minus One, in which writer and director Takashi Yamazaki turned his attention away from American sins during World War II to examine Japan’s actions. He doesn’t let America off the hook—an early scene ties the birth of Godzilla directly to U.S. testing weapons at Bikini Atoll—but he’s more interested in his country’s response to what happened.

That approach permitted Godzilla Minus One to go in a different direction from previous Godzilla movies, allowing it to grapple with new heavy themes.

Where the original film dealt with the specter of atomic weaponry manifesting in the form of a monster that destroys cities anew, Shin Godzilla from 2016 took inspiration from the 2011 Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant disaster. In that movie, Godzilla was a threat, but worse was the beaucracy that proved totally unable to handle a crisis. In Godzilla Minus One, American attacks created the monster, but Japan added death to death through its practice of using kamikaze pilots. In its triumphant final moments, Kōichi chooses life and decides against sacrificing himself.

From the teaser, we can see that Godzilla Minus Zero will ask Kōichi and Kenji to make that choice again. Against the threat of an unstoppable force, while they give into their fears and become monsters themselves? Or will they find a way to embrace life once again, and walk a different path? Godzilla Minus Zero may bring the franchise back to the horror of atomic weapons, but maybe it too will chart out a new path for the series.

Godzilla Minus Zero arrives in theaters on November 6, 2026.

Ian McKellen Single-Handedly Elevated Nerd Culture in the 2000s

“We are the future, Charles. Not them.” When Ian McKellen delivered this line in 2000’s X-Men, he did so as Erik Lehnsherr a.k.a. Magneto. By “we,” he meant mutants, people who develop incredible powers at puberty; by “them,” he meant the rest of humanity. But the phrase may very well also refer to a different change happening in the world, one way more successful than any of the plots that Magneto hatched with his Brotherhood of Evil Mutants.

Along with 1998’s Blade, 2002’s Spider-Man, and 2005’s Batman Begins, X-Men helped pave the way for the era of superhero domination, best represented by the success of the Marvel Cinematic Universe. At the same time, McKellen also brought his significant gravitas to Gandalf the Grey in the Lord of the Rings franchise, aiding that trilogy’s eventual victory at the 2004 Academy Awards. Thus, in the early 2000s, nerds were the future, not the average moviegoer. And thanks to McKellen’s committed work in both series, nerd culture didn’t just become popular—it became respectable.

[Editor’s Note: Ian McKellen is fine. This is not a eulogy. We were just thinking about how awesome he was in X-Men and Lord of the Rings and wanted to write about it.]

Of course, both X-Men and Lord of the Rings had their rabid fans before 2000. Although they initially received a mixed reception when released in the mid-1950s, the Lord of the Rings novels exploded in popularity among fantasy fans in the 1960s, and directly contributed to the growth of the genre. “Frodo Lives!” appeared in graffiti across the U.S. and Led Zeppelin sang about Gollum in “Ramble On,” but most considered the story too dense for general consumption—a point seemingly confirmed by the visually-stunning but narratively messy Ralph Bakshi animated features.

Likewise, the X-Men were the most popular franchise in comics by the time writer Chris Claremont completed his 17-year run in 1991, turning a C-tier Marvel property into a sensation. Claremont’s work was known for its denseness, from the florid prose he stuffed into caption boxes to his soap operatic plots about clones, time-travel, and aliens, many of which unfolded over years of ongoing stories. The X-Men popped up in cartoons and video games, but never got so much as a proper TV show.

In both cases, the movie adaptations worked, in part, because they streamlined the narratives and cut out some of the weirdest stuff. Gone were Tom Bombadil and (most of) the songs from Lord of the Rings. The X-Men wore black leather instead of yellow spandex, and the short, hairy, Canadian Wolverine was played by the tall, handsome Australian Hugh Jackman. There was a sense that as much as these movies loved their source material, there were parts deemed too goofy, too embarrassing for wider public.

Not so with McKellen’s performance. In Lord of the Rings, McKellen had to glue hair to his face and don a false nose. He had to pretend that he towered over his cast mates and deliver phrases like “Fool of a Took!” as if his life depended on it. In X-Men, McKellen wore a goofy helmet and had to address people who called themselves Sabretooth and Toad as if those were normal names that anyone could have.

Yet, he did it, fully embodying the humanity of both over-the-top characters. McKellen found realism in explicitly unrealistic worlds, whether it be the affection that Gandalf has for Frodo or the bond between Magneto and Xavier. Even better are the scenes in which McKellen got to unleash his gravitas. McKellen’s voice booms when Gandalf stares down the Balrog and bellows, “You shall not pass!” He may have been an actor on a set, delivering his lines to a stand in for a digital effect, but no one doubted that the words he muttered were a spell summoning deep magics, that his commands would cause the elements to stop. We have no problem suspending disbelief as Magneto floats across an expanse while his plastic cell collapses, because McKellen has such power when he mocks the guards for not killing him earlier.

Nerds watching these scenes recognize McKellen as the wizard and supervillain they’ve loved for years. But for the larger viewing audience, these scenes played as high drama, just as powerful as the Shakespeare works that McKellen had done on stage. Thanks to McKellen’s commitment, Lord of the Rings and X-Men weren’t just a novelty that briefly captured the public’s attention. They were art, worthy of elevating the form, moving to the future of cinema.

The 20 Greatest Cop Shows of All Time

Even in these days of endless entertainment options, it’s hard to turn on a TV and not see a cop. Police have been a mainstay of the medium since the now-lost series The Plainclothesman debuted in 1949, and especially when Dragnet made the jump from radio to television two years later. Yet, as omnipresent as they are on television, professional police are a relatively recent part of American life, only coming into being after the first departments were established in Boston and New York in 1838 and 1844, respectively. Yet, television helped normalize policing in the American consciousness, just as much as police stories helped make TV the preferred home for episodic adventures and drama.

That combination can make it difficult to enjoy TV shows about police, and yet even the most ardent defunding advocate can admire the artistry of a tense thrill sequence or enjoy a workplace comedy joke. So it’s through that lens that we look back at the history of television to rank the best cop shows of all time.

But first, just the facts: we’re dealing with only American shows about police on the state or local level. So you won’t find Cracker or Prime Suspect here, nor will you find shows about FBI agents, sheriffs, or marshals; sorry Dale Cooper, Andy Taylor, and Raylan Givens. But with that out of the way, let’s examine this line-up of compelling shows about those who enforce law and order.

20. T.J. Hooker (1982–1986)

If you know T.J. Hooker at all, you probably think of it as the show that William Shatner did after Star Trek, co-starring heartthrobs Adrian Zmed and Heather Locklear, as well as future Star Trek: Voyager and Deep Space Nine actors Richard Herd and James Darren. In your memory, T.J. Hooker is probably a quaint, if kind of corny, show about a veteran officer who delivers hammy speeches to cop and criminal alike.

Certainly, a lot of T.J. Hooker is exactly that, with the star going full Shatner when not grinning in bewilderment at the wholesome shenanigans of Zmed’s Vincent Romano and Locklear’s Stacy Sheridan. Everything else in the show is a gritty crime drama in the vein of Dirty Harry—the second episode even rips off the school bus scene from that movie. The show presents Southern California as a place of constant danger, with murderers and rapists at every turn. Furthermore, most of Hooker’s melodramatic speeches are about how lawyers, psychologists, and reporters show too much sympathy for criminals, and keep cops from stopping the bad guys by any means necessary. It’s a weird juxtaposition, one that results in a show that isn’t good, really, but is fascinating to watch.

19. Homicide: Life on the Street (1993–1999)

The cop show landscape of the 1990s was ruled by two series: the gritty, boundary-pushing NYPD Blue and the reliable Law & Order. Homicide: Life on the Street came in distant third place, as it does on this list, a fact that irritates its fans. It’s easy to see why people love Homicide so much. It has an incredible pedigree, created by two-time Oscar nominee Paul Attanasio and based on the book Homicide: A Year on the Killing Streets by David Simon. Its ensemble cast included Andre Braugher, Yaphet Kotto, Melissa Leo, and Richard Belzer, who debuted his character John Munch on the show. Film legends such as Barry Levinson, Whit Stillman, Barbara Koppell, and Kathryn Bigelow directed episodes.

So why is Homicide still falling so far down the list, even in 2026? Because the show never figured out what it wanted to be. Despite drawing inspiration from Simon’s true crime reporting, Homicide borrowed heavily from independent cinema to highlight its artifice. Hard cuts would show multiple takes of a single line reading, and interactions in “the Box,” the precinct’s interrogation room, became opportunities for theatrical scenery-chewing. Worse, NBC began toying with the show after season 3, culminating with a disastrous and unrecognizable seventh season. In the end, Homicide had nothing more than potential, potential that would be realized by the second series based on Simon’s book.

18. Dragnet (1951–1959)

It is impossible to overstate the importance of Dragnet, the series created by and starring Jack Webb as Sgt. Joe Friday. Originally a popular radio show that became a sensation when it went to TV, Dragnet realized the ambitions of reformers who sought to change the public’s perception of police. Where most Americans thought of police as inconveniences, if not the very type of standing army warned against in the Declaration of Independence, Dragnet presented its officers as professional, dispassionate, and effective. And, thanks to Webb’s cooperation with the LAPD, Dragnet got to present its episodes as realistic, a strategy countless other shows would emulate.

That said, influence isn’t the same as quality, and Dragnet‘s a tough watch in 2026. Each episode follows the same basic formula, in which Friday and his partner (most often Frank Smith, played by Ben Alexander) arrive to investigate a crime, talk to some witnesses and suspects, and solve the case. While the cases do have their flamboyant moments, as demonstrated by the stunts in premiere episode “The Human Bomb,” the show played it safe, something the public craved at the time, but has aged poorly.

17. The Rookie (2018–Present)

In a lot of ways, The Rookie feels like an update on T.J. Hooker. Once again, we have a charismatic actor known for playing a space traveller, now playing a man who becomes a beat cop later in life. And, as with T. J. Hooker, the star’s considerable charm helps to smooth over some of the more unsavory parts of the series.

In this case, that star is Nathan Fillion as John Nolan, a 45-year-old builder who moves from Pennsylvania to Los Angeles after his divorce to become a police officer. Despite the unlikely premise, The Rookie sticks to the standard police procedural formula: a new case every week, tough chiefs and fresh-faced newcomers, character actors as vibrant villains. But Fillion’s natural charisma allows The Rookie to laugh itself, softening the self-importance that plagues so many modern cop shows.

16. Sledge Hammer! (1986–1988)

Everything you need to know about Sledge Hammer! can be learned by watching the finale of the first season. Believing that the show’s low ratings meant it was bound for cancellation, creator Alan Spencer had his reactionary hero Inspector Sledge Hammer (David Rasche, better known today for Succession) fail to stop a terrorist’s nuclear bomb. As a result, the season ends with not just the death of every character, but also the destruction of Los Angeles. When the show returned for a surprise second season, Spencer just began the first episode “five years before that nuclear explosion” and carried on.

The ridiculous storytelling choice works because Sledge Hammer! is a ridiculous show, intentionally so. Inspector Hammer follows in the footsteps of Inspector Harry Callahan of Dirty Harry fame, albeit in the shiny, overheated form that violent cop movies took in the 1980s. Carrying a .44 Magnum with his namesake engraved on the handle, Hammer must not only deal with the criminal scum of San Francisco, but also his sensitive new partner Dori Doreau (Anne-Marie Martin) and his oft-apoplectic boss, Captain Trunk (Harrison Page). Fortunately, he can just shoot the criminals, which Sledge Hammer! plays for absurd comedy.

15. Car 54 Where Are You? (1961–1963)

Much milder than Sledge Hammer! but no less funny, Car 54, Where Are You? was the first sitcom about police, and still one of the best. The series paired the short, excitable Gunther Toody (Joe E. Ross) with the tall and taciturn Frances Muldoon (Fred Gwynne) as partners in the New York police department. The easy chemistry between the two, combined with sharp comedy writing of the era, make Car 54, Where Are You? incredibly fun, even today.

For example of what the show does best, see season one episode “Something Nice for Sol,” in which Toody convinces the precinct to get some new shoes for their desk sergeant, Sol Abrams (Nathaniel Frey). Toody and Muldoon spend the entire episode trying to discretely measure Sol’s shoe size, shenanigans made all the more heightened because they happen in a police department. The show’s style might be outdated, but the gags are as funny as ever.

14. Cagney & Lacey (1982–1988)

While actual policing is inherently conservative and works to maintain the status quo, police shows tend to be quite progressive. Thus, you get Nipsey Russell on Car 54, Where Are You?, and gay characters portrayed in a positive light in Barney Miller and NYPD Blue. Cagney & Lacey is one of the best examples of the phenomenon, a series that stars Sharon Gless and Tyne Daly as Detectives Mary Beth Lacey and Christine Cagney.

Certainly, Cagney & Lacey dealt with sexism on the force, but no more so than The Mary Tyler Moore Show or any other series about working women. Gless played Cagney as a no-nonsense career woman, who wanted on-the-job success more than a husband or children. Daly’s Lacey had to balance her police work with her duties as a wife and mother, often creating tension. While those dynamics could make episodes didactic, Gless and Daly brought a lightness and humanity to the part that made even the preachiest moments feel human.

13. The Shield (2002–2008)

Obviously, The Shield isn’t a bad a show, or it wouldn’t be on this list at all. But now, nearly two decades after its conclusion, it’s clear that The Shield was never the show it pretended to be. During its original run on FX, The Shield purported to be a study about the grey morality of policing, the compromises we have to make in order to feel safe. Inspired by the Rampart Scandal, creator Shawn Ryan cast Michael Chiklis (who formerly played a cuddly officer on The Commish) as Detective Vic Mackey, whose Strike Team has broad leeway to deal with exceptional crimes, and yet he still crosses line after line.

Looking back, we can see that The Shield never took its question seriously. From the moment that Mackey tortures a suspect to find a missing girl in the pilot, its clear that The Shield believes that we unquestionably need guys like Mackey to deal with the increasingly terrifying villains introduced each new season. That belief makes The Shield morally reprehensible pulp, but the show’s cast and big-time guest stars, including heralded turns by Glenn Close and Forest Whitaker, make it high-quality, morally reprehensible pulp.

12. Starsky & Hutch (1975–1979)

In the same way that cop shows made policing look progressive, they also make it look cool. Before that approach reached its apex with Miami Vice, there was Starsky & Hutch, which brought to television the buddy cop formula being developed by Freebie and the Bean and Thunderbolt and Lightfoot. Paul Michael Glaser and David Soul play David Starsky and Kenneth “Hutch” Hutchison, a mismatched pair of detectives working in Southern California.

While the series definitely addressed antagonisms between the leads, most episodes emphasized their friendship. The camaraderie and chemistry that Glaser and Soul brought to the part paired well the with the show’s action, especially in the first two seasons. Moreover, the friendship made Starsky & Hutch feel like two of the coolest dudes on television, even if they were stopping trouble instead of causing it.

11. CSI: Crime Scene Investigation (2000–2015)

Cop shows don’t just portray officers as moral and efficient defenders of the weak. They also depict policing as cutting-edge technology, positioning the forces of law and order as advanced and civilized, in contrast to the barbarian criminal element. Such has been the case since August Vollmer, “the father of modern policing,” advocated for the science of criminology in the 1920s and integrated it into his interactions with the media, but rarely has the technological side been as foregrounded as it was on the CBS series CSI.

CSI starred Manhunter‘s William Petersen as Dr. Gil Grissom, leader of a team of forensic scientists in the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department. Along with Catherine Willows (Marg Helgenberger), Grissom and his unit analyze blood-splatter, run fingerprints through databases, and decode DNA to find ironclad proof of guilt, even in the most unlikely of cases. The series was a true phenomenon throughout the 2000s, making fans of Quentin Tarantino (who directed the season five finale “Grave Danger”) and convincing the public that human police may be fallible, but police science is not.

10. True Detective (2014–Present)

Few television shows are harder to rank than True Detective. Had the series ended after its electric first season, then it would easily be in the top five. Had it ceased after its disastrous second season, it wouldn’t make this list at all. Thankfully, the solid third and fourth seasons are enough to not just secure its position in our rankings, but to make the top 10.

Created by Nic Pizzolatto, True Detective takes an anthology approach inspired by the pulp magazines that give the show its name. Pizzolatto and director Cary Joji Fukunaga caught lightning in a bottle for its first season, which paired Woody Harrelson‘s straight-laced hypocrite with Matthew McConaughey‘s burn-out weirdo as detectives on a case with supernatural overtones. Pizzolatto’s style became a liability with season two, but the additions of filmmakers such as Jeremy Saulnier and Issa López helped return True Detective to some of its former glory.

9. Brooklyn Nine-Nine (2013–2021)

A spiritual successor to co-creator Michael Schur’s workplace comedies The Office and Parks and Recreation, Brooklyn Nine-Nine wisely eschewed the documentary conceit of those series and committed itself to being a workplace comedy. Schur and co-creator/showrunner Dan Goor took what could have been just an Andy Samberg vehicle and turned it into one of the most delightful ensemble shows on television, one that used its police precinct setting as a reliable story engine.

Joining Samberg’s lovable slacker Jake Peralta is a cast of well-drawn characters that include Melissa Fumero as overachiever Amy Santiago, Stephanie Beatriz as the tough Rosa Diaz, and Terry Crews as soft-hearted muscleman Terry Jeffords. The true standout is Andre Braugher as Captain Raymond Holt, who retains all the gravitas of his days on Homicide: Life on the Street, but adds a layer of comedic precision that no one would have expected.

8. NYPD Blue (1993–2005)

Some will certainly see this low ranking and immediately get angry, so let’s get this out of the way first: NYPD Blue is excellent. Not only does the series achieve the rare feat of surviving the loss of multiple handsome male leads, elevating Dennis Franz’ Andy Sipowicz to the position of prime-time mainstay, but it tells compelling, boundary-pushing stories on network TV. It’s no understatement to say that NYPD Blue paved the way for the Golden Age of Television. And yet, NYPD Blue remains in the shadow of the show that paved its way, a series that holds up even better and will be discussed a few entries higher.

But let’s set that aside to praise NYPD Blue for what it does well. Shot on gritty film and employing a day-in-the-life format, the series focused largely on Sipowicz and his colleagues through the daily grind of their jobs. Although just as supportive of policing as any other show on this list, NYPD Blue creators Steven Bochco and David Milch do turn their attention to the unsavory parts of the institution. The results don’t always work (see Gordon Clapp’s Medavoy, perhaps the most irritating character in television history), but they also allow Franz to make Sipowicz into a three-dimensional figure rarely seen before on a cop show.

7. Miami Vice (1984–1989)

All of the shows on this list endeavor to make police look competent and effective. But Miami Vice takes it one more step to make police officers look cool. Created by television veteran Anthony Yerkovich, Miami Vice made Don Johnson‘s Sonny Crockett and Philip Michael Thomas’ Rico Tubbs two of the hippest figures of the ’80s, despite the show’s reactionary War on Drugs politics.

The story of undercover detectives working the drug trade of Southern Florida, Miami Vice still holds to standard police procedural conventions. Yet, it coats them with a hip aesthetic, from its neon color palette to its Jan Hammer theme to the visual contributions of filmmaker Michael Mann, who also served as executive producer. So dominant was Miami Vice in the ’80s that no attempt to revive the franchise, including a 2006 movie directed by Mann, could replicate the success of the original series.

6. Law & Order: Special Victims Unit (1999–Present)

Created in 1990 by Dick Wolf, Law & Order was the purest update of the Dragnet model. Each episode purported to be “ripped from the headlines,” promising realistic cases, investigated by dedicated professionals and prosecuted by lawyers with a passion for justice. Law & Order forever changed the way we think about the criminal justice system, and spawning a host of spinoffs, none more successful than Special Victims Unit.

SVU did away with the high-minded pretensions of the original series and embraced its nasty pulp heart. Focusing on a division dedicated to sexual crimes allowed the show to deal with only the most sensational stories, and while the series has a pleasing supporting cast—including John Munch, imported from Homicide, and Ice-T’s Fin Tutuola—the show’s anchor has always been Mariska Hargitay’s dedicated but haunted Olivia Benson, who worked best when partnered with Christopher Meloni’s violent family man Elliot Stabler. Flawed heroes for a nasty show, SVU gives the masses the dark pleasures of noir and exploitation works, while staying safely within the police procedural genre.

5. Police Squad! (1982)

Police Squad! aired just six episodes. But it was so funny, so packed with jokes, that it became an immediate cult hit, soon spawning three Naked Gun films with original star Leslie Nielsen and a recent legacy sequel with Liam Neeson. Creators David Zucker, Jim Abrahams, and Jerry Zucker applied the same formula that brought them great success with 1980’s Airplane!, riffing on straight-laced material (specifically the Lee Marvin series M Squad) by amping up the absurdity around Nielsen’s stoic Frank Drebin.

Each of Police Squad!‘s six episodes are packed with jokes, starting with the opening credits, in which see each character introduced by returning fire at an unseen gunman (including Abraham Lincoln, who survives his assassination attempt to shoot back at John Wilkes Booth). The gags range from the subtle (a stretcher from a crime scene persists in the background of several shots) to the corny (“I told you, no sax before the fight,” Frank tells a boxer) to the sublime (when a gangster asks, “Who are you? How did you get in here?” Frank answers, “I’m a locksmith, and I’m a locksmith”). With such quality jokes, six episodes is enough to make Police Squad! one of the best police shows of all time.

4. Columbo (1971–1979, 1989–2003)

By 1971, the New Hollywood movement was well underway. But television audiences were not necessarily ready to welcome gritty male heroes like Harry Callahan and Popeye Doyle into their living rooms. So they got the softer, kinder vision in Peter Falk as the titular detective of Columbo, and the results were spectacular. Originally created by Richard Levinson and William Link in their short story “Enough Rope,” which they then turned into a successful stage play, Columbo first hit the screen in a TV movie, played by Bert Freed. But when the story was remade in 1968 as “Prescription: Murder” with Falk in the part, the stage was set for television history.

Neither “Prescription: Murder” nor its 1971 follow-up “Ransom for a Dead Man” featured the fully-formed Columbo. But by the time the premiere episode “Murder By the Book” (directed by a young Steven Spielberg!) hit the airwaves in 1971, all the hallmarks were there: the dirty raincoat, the references to his wife, the stopping criminals for just one more thing. Combined with a host of great guest stars that included William Shatner, Dick Van Dyke, and Janet Leigh, Columbo is cozy comfort viewing at its finest.

3. Hill Street Blues (1981–1987)

Remember how we said that NYPD Blue is good, but still in the shadow of its predecessor? Here is the predecessor, Hill Street Blues, created by Steven Bochco and Michael Kozoll. Inspired (unofficially) by writer Ed McBain’s 87th Precinct novels, Hill Street Blues was the first cop show to foreground the work of policing. The series takes an ensemble approach, with characters with a range of roles in the department each pursuing their own storylines, which occur between morning roll call (concluded by Sgt. Phil Esterhaus’s admonition, “Let’s be safe out there”) and the evening, when Captain Frank Furillo convenes with his girlfriend, defense attorney Joyce Davenport.

In addition to Esterhaus (Michael Conrad), Furillo (Daniel J. Travanti), and Davenport (Veronica Hamel), most episodes also check in on beat cops Bobby Hill (Michael Warren) and Andy Renko (Charles Haid), detective Henry Goldblume (Joe Spano), and undercover officers Washington (Taurean Blacque) and LaRue (Kiel Martin). Although often messy, Hill Street Blues adds a level of realism that breaks the cop show out of the confines of the procedural and opens new dramatic avenues.

2. Barney Miller (1975–1982)

Most of the shows on this list have pretty great theme songs. But none, absolutely none, go as unnecessarily hard as the theme to Barney Miller. Despite the promise of action by the rocking opening credits, Barney Miller is an unfailingly gentle show. Early on, the series establishes a formula that works, with each episode featuring an A-plot built around a suspect brought into the precinct and a B-plot following a cast member’s personal issue. Violence rarely occurs, only a handful of episodes leave the central precinct set, and nearly every conflict resolves through Barney’s level-headed intercession.

Such a low-stakes approach might get boring, but Barney Miller works because of its fantastic cast. As the paternalistic and endlessly patient Barney, Hal Linden is the ideal straight man, always ready with a perfect reaction shot. Max Gail’s lovable himbo Wojciehowicz (it’s spelled like it sounds) and Ron Glass’ sophisticated Harris may be the only characters to remain in all seven seasons, but the others who come in and out, especially Abe Vigoda’s old-timer Fish and Nick Soo’s sardonic Yemana, make the most of their stays. Although often cited as the most realistic depiction of actual police work, Barney Miller presents the ultimate fantasy of policing, that the departments consist of understanding people who solve problems through empathetic debate, never force.

1. The Wire (2002–2008)

In the very first scene of The Wire, Baltimore homicide detective Jimmy McNulty (Dominic West) listens to the story of a recent murder victim, nicknamed Snot Boogey. After a witness (Jamal Bostic-Smith) recounts how Snot would constantly steal from crap games, despite threats of violence, McNulty asks why they would let him play. “You got to, man,” answers the incredulous friend. “This is America.”

That one scene captures everything great about The Wire, created by journalist and Homicide author David Simon. It’s not just that the scene looks directly at the way economic disparity and the criminal justice system create suffering in America. It’s the deft way the show turns realistic, street-level dialogue into the stuff of poetry, a feat surpassed later when McNulty and his partner Bunk (Wendell Pierce) conduct an entire investigation while only exchanging f-bombs. The Wire managed to present its cops and criminals as normal, fallible people, and to address some of the most pressing issues in the country, without ever failing to be impeccably-crafted and endlessly-engaging art.