Vought Rising Trailer, Release Date, Story, and Characters Explained

Following the conclusion of its popular mothership show, the world of The Boys is going back in time to the 1950s with a new prequel series called Vought Rising. Jensen Ackles will reprise the role of Soldier Boy in the upcoming Prime Video project, which will explore the charismatic Supe’s adventures long before Butcher and co. encountered him.

We’ve got everything you need to know about Vought Rising right here, minus the finer details of what Clara would have wanted, so let’s get you prepped on what to expect when the show debuts next year.

Vought Rising Story: Why Soldier Boy Is Who He Is

Revolution’s Paul Grellong serves as the showrunner for Vought Rising, which The Boys creator Eric Kripke describes as a murder-mystery. Set years after Soldier Boy’s time at the Fort Harmony WWII base, where Frederick Vought, the founder of Vought International, worked and conducted V1 serum experiments, Vought Rising will explore the origins of his powerful company and also catch up with Soldier Boy as he grows closer to Vought’s wife, Clara, a.k.a. Liberty, a.k.a. Stormfront.

“It has this sort of lovely, almost noir-like murder mystery — not Black Noir but actual noir. There are detectives and twists, and there’s a murder that then opens up into a bigger conspiracy.” Kripke told THR about the show’s vibe.

Kripke also said that the creators are aiming for “a very gritty version” of the 50s, adding, “Most people’s feeling, or sense memory, of the 50s is from movies, which are very sanitized. Even L.A. Confidential, as much as I love it, is, visually, a pretty clean movie. We wanted dirty and grimy. There would be heroin dens, gay bars, and this underbelly of popular culture at the time.”

Ackles has also spoken about how the Soldier Boy we know today will differ from the one in Vought Rising, who still wants to be a real hero. He told EW that, “In The Boys, in modern times, [Soldier Boy is] a fish out of water. He’s an analog guy who’s trapped in a digital world. So now we see him in his element. We see what made him who he was.”

Though Kripke has declined to comment on whether the events of Vought Rising will set up the re-emergence of Soldier Boy in the present day, we would note that The Boys deliberately put the character on ice rather than killing him in the finale, leading many fans to suspect that Soldier Boy may be the future of The Boys, as well as its past.

Stan Edgar, who also brought Clara out of retirement as Stormfront in season 2, also lived to take over Vought International, so we could very well see these characters together again in the future.

Aya Cash as Clara Vought in Vought Rising

Vought Rising Characters Explained: New and Old Faces

Soldier Boy will often go by his real name, Ben, in Vought Rising, and he’ll be joined by a new crew that includes Bombsight (Mason Dye), Torpedo (Will Hochman), and Private Angel (Elizabeth Posey).

We’ve already met Bombsight on The Boys and know that he’s despised Ben for a long time. It sounds like he won’t be alone in feeling that way. “Soldier Boy was the only one who bought his way into the program as a rich kid, I don’t think really understanding how dangerous it was at the time,” Kripke told EW. “So everyone hated him. Even when you meet the other heroes in Vought Rising, they’re all pretty much rolling their eyes at this rich boy.”

Little is known about the other two Supes, Torpedo and Private Angel, but the former sports a Golden Age-style aquatic-themed suit, and the latter has apparently grown wings. We’ll definitely learn much more about these early immortal V1 recipients in Vought Rising.

Following her apparent death in season 3 of The Boys, Aya Cash will also return as an earlier version of Clara Vought. She was the first successful recipient of V1, and is a fascist Supe with ties to the Nazis who often uses her powers to torture and kill minorities. Though the prequel series won’t ask viewers to sympathize with her this time around either, Ben will most likely find her rhetoric irresistible.

“In no way will I ever ask the audience to sympathize with Stormfront. She’s a Nazi, and she sucks,” Kripke assured ScreenRant. “Soldier Boy? I think, if [The Boys is] teasing anything, it’s teasing that he really had feelings for Clara more than he had originally let on, and that you’ll see a lot of that play out in Vought Rising.”

KiKi Layne (If Beale Street Could Talk) and Jorden Myrie (Sherwood) are also part of the show’s cast. We don’t know much about Layne’s character yet, but we have spotted Jorden Myrie getting injected with V1 and gaining superpowers in Vought Rising’s first trailer.

Additionally, Ethan Slater is tipped to return as Thomas Godolkin, Frederick Vought’s right-hand man and the mind-controlling founder of Godolkin University, who was originally introduced on The Boyscancelled spinoff, Gen V. “I think we’d be insane to not put Ethan Slater’s character in that show,” Kripke stated.

And for anyone hoping for some new Supernatural cameos in Vought Rising after so many popping up on The Boys, we can confirm that Lucifer himself, Mark Pellegrino, has also been added to the cast! His role has yet to be revealed, but he probably won’t be playing Satan. Though in the world of The Boys, who knows! He could be someone much, much worse.

Cecily Strong (Saturday Night Live), Eric Johnson (Fifty Shades), and Annie Shapero (House of the Dragon) have also been cast in recurring roles.

Vought Rising Trailer: A Brighter Future

Amazon released a first look at Vought Rising after the finale of The Boys dropped, and you can see it below. The trailer shows Soldier Boy donning his old-school mask and suit while giving us a glimpse of the show’s Supes in action. There’s also a traditional amount of blood and needle drops to keep fans happy!

Vought Rising Release Date

Vought Rising is now eyeing a 2027 release on Prime Video. When the streamer zeroes in on a more specific release date, we’ll let you know!

Hammer Dracula Restoration Cut Can Establish Christopher Lee As the Scariest Vampire

We here at Den of Geek respect every bloodsucker, whether it’s Orlok, Lestat, Count von Count, or Selene (X-Men or Underworld variety; we’re not picky). Yet, we have to admit that Count Dracula is the greatest vampire of them all. But who is the greatest Dracula? That’s a trickier question. The obvious answer is Bela Lugosi from the Universal Classics, and cinephiles may praise Gary Oldman from Francis Ford Coppola‘s now-reclaimed movie. Contrarians and hipsters might cite Frank Langella’s sensuous take in 1979 or Leslie Nielsen’s buffoon from Mel Brooks‘s Dracula: Dead and Loving It, but few can come to consensus.

That may be about to change, as one of the most beloved cinematic Draculas gets an upgrade. Warner Bros. is in the process of restoring the 1958 Hammer film Horror of Dracula, starring Christopher Lee as a particularly satanic version of the vampire. “We managed to get the uncut original Christopher Lee Dracula. So we’ve just been remastering that now,” Hammer head John Gore told Deadline. The new version will restore three minutes that were cut from the film to appease censors.

“Hammer’s business was based on the censor,” Gore explained. “Getting that X-rated certificate was crucial to marketing, but they could only go so far because the censors didn’t like what they saw — all that blood.”

Directed by Terence Fischer and just titled Dracula in its native U.K., Horror of Dracula retold the classic Bram Stoker story through a lurid, Technicolor lens. Pit against Peter Cushing’s Van Helsing, Lee played Dracula as at once regal and monsterous, believable as both a member of the aristocracy and as a creature of the night. Moreover, Hammer emphasized the sexuality of the original story, something only implied in the previous Universal version. The loose necklines on the costumes worn by Melissa Stribling and Carol Marsh weren’t there just to tempt Dracula with their jugular veins.

That sexuality was a key part of the problem, said Gore. One of the excised bits includes a scene “where Christopher Lee descends on the woman and is about to bite her. It’s so sexual and they had to trim that because it just looked like it was nothing to do with vampires,” he teased. “And now that’s back in. All the crucial points that were axed are now back in.”

Alluring as all the sex and violence may be, Gore’s most excited about restoring a key plot point, related to the death of the titular vampire. “They had to trim a bit of the sexual stuff and then how he’s destroyed at the end. They cut quite a lot out because they went, ‘It’s too gruesome,'” said Gore. But when a director’s cut of the film was found in a Warner Brothers storage facility, Gore was given the ability to show the world “the bits they weren’t seeing, which is mostly to do with how Dracula dies at the end.”

With his end fully revealed, and both his terror and allure completely realized, the debate may be at an end. Horror of Dracula may finally establish Christopher Lee as the scariest Dracula we’ve ever seen.

Idris Elba Finally Shuts Down James Bond Rumors

Luther and The Wire star Idris Elba has long been the ideal next James Bond for some of 007’s vocal fan base, but the actor has now confirmed that he was never in the running to step into the iconic British spy’s shoes.

In a new interview with People at the premiere of his new movie, Masters of the Universe, Elba reacted to the notion that his name was once again being suggested for Bond as Amazon seeks to follow up on the success of the Daniel Craig era, saying, “My name’s not getting thrown out, no way. They’re going younger. And I wish them all the luck of the world. I can’t wait — it’s going to be amazing.”

Elba added, “I’m honestly not in the race ever. I wasn’t in the race in the first place.”

The Hackney-born actor and DJ previously told the Smartless podcast in 2023 that he felt “super complimented” by the persistent rumors that he might be the next James Bond, noting that the role is “one of those sort of coveted types” but that the ensuing cultural conversation about the character’s race had disheartened him.

“Essentially, it was a huge compliment that every corner of the world — except for some corners, which we will not talk about — were really happy about the idea that I could be considered,” he said. “Those that weren’t happy about the idea made the whole thing disgusting and off-putting, because it became about race. It became about nonsense, and I got the brunt of it.”

Amazon MGM Studios officially announced earlier this month that it was searching for a new James Bond, stating that it doesn’t plan to comment on specific casting details but is “excited to share more news with 007 fans as soon as the time is right.”

Denis Villeneuve (Dune) is attached to direct the film, with Steven Knight (Peaky Blinders) penning the script.

Jared Leto’s Silence on Masters of the Universe Is Reportedly No Accident

The folks at Amazon may be breathing a sigh of relief that Jared Leto is nowhere near the marketing of what will hopefully be its next blockbuster, a new industry report suggests.

Following high-profile flops Morbius and Tron: Ares, Leto’s star power has been questioned of late, but you’d still expect to see him publicisizing his new film, Masters of the Universe, ahead of its June 5 release. After all, Leto plays iconic big bad Skeletor in the flick and apparently bagged over $5 million for the role.

Yet, as Puck points out, Leto wasn’t at the film’s big premiere event last week or at Amazon’s CinemaCon presentation. He won’t be dropping by any talk shows to promote the movie either. Hell, he hasn’t even posted anything on Insta about it, where he has over 11 million followers.

According to Puck’s source, Leto “wasn’t thrilled” with Masters of the Universe, but you’d imagine he’d have to show up for press and events regardless. Even if you think your movie’s a dud, you usually still have to do the rounds for it.

Amazon is seemingly just fine with letting Leto stay at home or on Mars Island, or wherever he is at the moment, though, and Puck reasons that “downplaying” his involvement in Masters of the Universe makes sense, given the allegations that were made against the actor last summer, when nine women accused Leto of sexual impropriety. It’s worth noting that these allegations emerged after Leto first accepted the role of Skeletor in 2024, but they certainly did not stop him from promoting Tron: Ares, suggesting other factors are at play. Leto’s face is also covered with a CGI mask in Masters of the Universe, which may further minimize his impact on the rollout.

He stars opposite Nicholas Galitzine (Red, White & Royal Blue) as Prince Adam/He-Man in the new adaptation of Mattel’s popular franchise. The film has been in development for a long time, with directors like John Woo, Jon M. Chu, Joe Cornish, and Rian Johnson linked to the project over the last 20 years, before Bumblebee’s Travis Knight finally took the helm in 2024.

15 Cringe Moments in Otherwise Great Shows

Even the greatest television shows are not completely immune to awkward scenes, strange creative decisions, or episodes that make fans want to skip ahead immediately during rewatches. One painfully awkward moment can stick in viewers’ memories for years, especially when surrounded by seasons of excellent television. Even legendary series occasionally delivered scenes that made audiences cringe harder than intended.

People

How I Met Your Mother — Pumpkin Reveal

Years of buildup led to a reveal that felt awkward and disappointing.

SlashFilm

Lost — Nikki and Paulo Introduction

Fans immediately rejected the characters because they suddenly appeared as if they had always been important.

TVovermind

Sherlock — Fakeout Death Explanations

The show built huge anticipation around Sherlock’s survival before turning the reveal into a frustrating joke.

The Hollywood Reporter

Stranger Things — Eleven’s Punk Episode

The side storyline involving Eleven’s new group remains one of the show’s least loved detours.

Collider

The Office — Scott’s Tots

The episode is so deeply embarrassing that many viewers still skip it entirely during rewatches.

Historica Wiki – Fandom

The Sopranos — Massive Genius Episode

The strange music industry subplot felt disconnected from the tone that made the show great.

DailyMotion

The Walking Dead — CGI Deer Scene

The poorly rendered deer became one of the most mocked visual moments in the show’s history.

ScreenRant

Breaking Bad — Skyler Singing “Happy Birthday”

The awkward office performance became infamous among fans for its painfully uncomfortable energy.

Reddit

Buffy the Vampire Slayer — Buffy and Spike’s Bathroom Scene

The scene became one of the series’s most controversial and uncomfortable moments.

Looper

Dexter — Deb Confessing Romantic Feelings

The storyline shocked fans for all the wrong reasons and remains heavily criticized today.

Yahoo

Friday Night Lights — The Murder Storyline

A sudden criminal subplot felt completely disconnected from the grounded emotional drama audiences loved.

Decider

Friends — Ross Trying to Flirt With His Cousin

The storyline felt bizarre and uncomfortable even by the sitcom’s usual chaotic standards.

Rolling Stone

Game of Thrones — Ed Sheeran Cameo

The celebrity’s appearance instantly pulled many viewers out of the fantasy world completely.

BuzzFeed

Glee — “The Fox” Performance

Even for Glee, the bizarre musical number crossed into pure secondhand embarrassment territory.

Looper

Grey’s Anatomy — Ghost Denny Romance

The supernatural romance storyline became unintentionally ridiculous for many longtime viewers.

TV Shows That Felt Like Homework by Season 3

Season three is where shows either demonstrate their staying power, or start falling through the wayside. What began as fun weekly entertainment can slowly turn into a commitment filled with tangled lore, repeated plot cycles, exhausting emotional arcs, and storylines that demand full concentration just to keep up.

That does not always mean these shows became bad. In many cases, they stayed popular, critically praised, or deeply ambitious. But somewhere around season three, watching them could feel less like relaxing on the couch and more like finishing an assignment. These are TV shows that started to feel like homework.

IMDb

The Walking Dead

By season three, the prison arc was still strong, but the show had already settled into a rhythm of long speeches, endless survival debates, and repeated “find shelter, lose shelter” storytelling that started feeling emotionally taxing.

IMDb

Lost

Season three is where many viewers felt Lost began demanding too much patience. More mysteries piled up, side characters like Nikki and Paulo drew backlash, and the show increasingly asked fans to track lore like a chore.

IMDb

Westworld

Even fans who admired its ambition often felt Westworld became mentally exhausting by its third season. Complex timelines gave way to dense philosophy, layered tech jargon, and plotting some critics called increasingly hard to follow.

IMDb

Prison Break

By season three, escaping prison again felt like the show testing how much suspense it could recycle. The Sona setting kept tension high, but repeating the core premise made it feel more like work than thrilling escalation.

IMDb

Once Upon a Time

Fairy-tale mashups had become increasingly tangled during the third season. Multiple realms, memory wipes, curses, and rotating villains made following the mythology feel less whimsical and more like crossover fan fiction.

IMDb

Vikings

As the series widened beyond Ragnar’s rise, shifting loyalties, invasions, and political maneuvering made the show more demanding. By season three, it rewarded attention, but it definitely asked for it.

IMDb

Empire

Its family power battles were juicy early on, but by later seasons, betrayals, boardroom wars, and repeated internal takeovers made the drama feel increasingly circular and exhausting.

IMDb

House of Cards

Season three slowed the political rise and leaned harder into procedural power struggles. For some viewers, Frank Underwood’s manipulation became less sharp thrill and more repetitive strategy lecture.

IMDb

How to Get Away with Murder

Flash-forwards, legal twists, and murder cover-ups were the appeal, but deeper into the show, unraveling timelines and hidden motives often felt like the viewers themselves needed case files.

IMDb

Billions

Sharp dialogue remained a draw, but the constant financial warfare, legal maneuvering, and strategic revenge plots could feel taxing for anyone not fully invested in power games.

IMDb

True Blood

Season three pushed deeper into supernatural politics, vampire hierarchies, and expanding mythology. What started as pulpy fun began asking viewers to juggle more lore than some wanted from campy horror drama.

IMDb

The Affair

The sharp relationship drama grew heavier by season three. Multiple timelines, unreliable perspectives, and emotional fallout made following each version of events feel more like grueling analysis than casual viewing.

IMDb

The 100

As the world expanded, so did alliances, betrayals, and moral calculations. Its dense faction politics and constant ethical resets could feel like keeping up with battlefield homework.

IMDb

The Man in the High Castle

Its alternate-history premise stayed compelling, but once the show kept going through its seasons, political factions, resistance movements, and layered world-building made the show feel increasingly dense and demanding.

IMDb

Bates Motel

The psychological tension stayed strong, yet by season three, Norman’s unraveling and increasingly dark family drama turned the series into emotionally heavy viewing rather than easy binge material.

The Mandalorian and Grogu Box Office Confirms New Reality for Star Wars (and It’s Not Bad)

The numbers are in—or at least initial estimates from the Mouse House—and Star Wars: The Mandalorian and Grogu surpassed expectations this holiday weekend. According to the studio, the latest movie set in the galaxy far, far away took off with an estimated $100 million in the U.S., flying well past its pre-weekend estimates which had landed it somewhere between $80 and $85 million during the four-day timeframe. Even inside the traditional three-day frame, the film still exceeded expectations with an estimated $81 million, which accounts for nearly half of the Mando flick’s $167 million global bow.

On its face alone, those are decent numbers for a Memorial Day release in the 2020s. But the question surely gnawing at longtime Lucasfilm fans and Disney shareholders is: are those numbers good enough for Star Wars? We’d argue yes, with some caveats…

In the modern Disney era of George Lucas’ creation, the opening could be written of as weak at a glance, coming in below what was previously perceived as a major disappointment for the brand, Solo: A Star Wars Story. That 2018 flick opened during the same Memorial Day holiday eight years ago and grossed $103 million across the four days. Also worth noting is it made $84 million across three days, similarly up over Mando despite nearly a decade of inflation.

At the time, those numbers were considered grim enough that Disney went into damage control ahead of the following year’s Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker, and Lucasfilm head Kathleen Kennedy struck a tone of reevaluation in the press, suggesting the studio would never recast an iconic classic character again—an irony since Lucasfilm continued developing Obi-Wan Kenobi as a Disney+ series starring not Alec Guinness.

So there’s thus a definite “glass half empty” way of looking at The Mandalorian and Grogu’s opening, which is a far cry from The Force Awakens’ $248 million debut in 2015 or even the much derided Rise of Skywalker in 2019, a movie that bowed at $177 million. Yet by virtue of those increasingly distant-sounding years on the other side of the COVID pandemic, a greater context should be considered.

If you view Mando and Grogu’s cinematic detour as purely the heir of a lofty 50-year legacy, the weight of expectations becomes severe. Conversely, if one takes a coolly spreadsheet-minded survey of the current field for Disney’s bread and butter—largely nostalgia-driven intellectual property, at least in terms of live-action—Mandalorian and Grogu could be considered a step in the right direction.

When counting the fourth day of the weekend, the new Star Wars film opened higher than Disney’s Marvel offering last May, Thunderbolts*, which grossed  $74 million during the first weekend of May, a spot that noticeably was occupied by Disney’s The Devil Wears Prada 2 this year (and which also opened above Thunderbolts). It’s also well up from last year’s Memorial Day weekend action release, the ostensibly final Mission: Impossible – The Final Reckoning, which debuted at $79 million. The year before saw Warners’ Furiosa have a notoriously bumpy rollout at $32 million.

If reports of Mandalorian and Grogu’s allegedly $165 million budget are to be believed, then the new Star Wars flick already bested its price tag in its first global weekend, albeit with the caveat that theater owners pocket about half of that initial haul. And in a world of diminished movie attendance in a post-pandemic, post-streaming, and frankly post Disney+ world, a holiday debut that just about crosses over into nine figures is not shabby.

When Solo was perceived as a failure, it was during a moment where no other Disney Star Wars movie earned less than $1 billion, and the Marvel machine was cranking out that number once or twice a year. It was also a time when the love for the brand—or more specifically the older films from the 1970s through 2000s—was higher. In other words, it was before market oversaturation that came with a new movie every year for five years straight, followed by a glut of arguably too many Disney+ streaming shows.

The Mandalorian and Grogu is directly derived from the biggest hits of that strategic pivot to streaming. So the movie might represent a new chapter for Star Wars at the studio, but it is also the culmination of a strategy that its new owners have been building to for a decade. Indeed, the goal since 2012 has been to always make Star Wars a brand that exists in perpetuity like Marvel Comics characters, DC, Star Trek, and a small collection of lucrative others. The downside was that Star Wars could (and we’d argue has) lost its specialness as a piece of film and pop culture history. It no longer represents a specific moment in its medium, industry, or fans’ lives, but is rather a product designed to appeal to all generations—and specifically the next generation(s) who need to replenish the customer base.

It is likely not a coincidence Lucasfilm recently revealed The Mandalorian is the most popular streaming Star Wars show with the children of today, aka Gen Alpha. For them, it’s as much or more Star Wars than the original trilogy their grandparents watch, and a movie that replicates that (if even to a detrimental effect, as I argued in my review) is not inherently a bad thing. It’s what Disney wants: Star Wars for the next generation.

The film is obviously not reaching the heights of the original trilogy, creatively or culturally, or even the financial whirlwind or the 2010s sequel trilogy. But as with Star Trek and other managed brands, it could find an “equilibrium” of young fans and older diehards who will turn up every year. That strategy inevitably creates a ceiling or “roof” on financial expectations, but it can go on in perpetuity. Which is the whole point.

We don’t know what Disney internally views as their own metric for success, but The Mandalorian and Grogu has an “A-” CinemaScore. That suggests the target demographics liked what they saw and thus might be back for more. If that’s the goal—as well as the accompanying merchandise, brand partnerships, and theme park experience opportunities—then this is the way for Star Wars going forward.

The Top 10 Most Remade Movies

A lot of stories get retold through the lens of different generations, with each director wanting to tackle it in different ways. However, what really motivates Hollywood into making these remakes is money. Recognizable stories sell well, and even if people don’t remember the original, it’s still a structure that has a proven track record.

Granted, not all of these stories got remade that many times, but enough to make you think. Whenever the industry runs out of ideas, it grabs from the bag of classics and hopes for the best. It clearly keeps working, since all these movies do well in cinemas around the globe.

IMDb

The Taking of Pelham One Two Three

The 1974 thriller got a 1998 TV remake and a major 2009 theatrical remake starring Denzel Washington and John Travolta. While not the most endlessly recycled movie, it fits because the same hostage-on-a-subway premise keeps getting revived whenever studios want tight urban suspense.

IMDb

Love Affair / An Affair to Remember

Classic Hollywood basically remade its own heartbreak. Love Affair was remade by the same director as An Affair to Remember, then later revisited again with the 1994 Love Affair. Different casts, same emotional setup, same doomed-romance appeal. It is one of the clearest cases where Hollywood just takes the same idea and does it again.

IMDb

Freaky Friday

Disney’s Freaky Friday had major versions in 1976, 1995, 2003, and a 2018 television adaptation. Even outside direct remakes, it helped cement one of cinema’s most reused identity-swap templates. The premise is so durable that Hollywood keeps treating it like free real estate.

IMDb

Little Women

Louisa May Alcott’s story may be prestige cinema’s favorite repeat assignment, with major film versions appearing in 1917, 1918, 1933, 1949, 1994, and 2019, plus television adaptations. Every generation seems convinced it can make the definitive Jo March. Somehow, everyone may be right. It is basically remake culture disguised as literary respectability.

IMDb

King Kong

The original 1933 giant-ape landmark was followed by a 1976 remake and Peter Jackson’s lavish 2005 remake, while later MonsterVerse films kept reinterpreting the character. Kong is less “remade constantly” and more “Hollywood periodically remembers giant monkey equals money.”

IMDb

Invasion of the Body Snatchers

The 1956 film got major remakes in 1978, 1993 (Body Snatchers), and 2007 (The Invasion). Few sci-fi horror stories have been directly retold this many times. The “people replaced by emotionless doubles” idea just keeps fitting new cultural anxieties.

IMDb

The Magnificent Seven

The Magnificent Seven was itself a western remake of Akira Kurosawa’s Seven Samurai, then later got a 2016 remake. Even spin-offs like Battle Beyond the Stars borrowed the same bones. It is one of cinema’s most durable “assemble warriors to defend the helpless” blueprints.

IMDb

A Star Is Born

The original 1937 film was followed by major remakes in 1954, 1976, and 2018, with each era reshaping the story around its music and celebrity culture. Very few films get repeatedly rebuilt this cleanly across decades while still staying culturally huge.

IMDb

Yojimbo / A Fistful of Dollars lineage

This one is less about official remakes and more about one story infecting entire genres. Kurosawa’s Yojimbo directly inspired A Fistful of Dollars, which famously mirrored much of its structure. Then the lone outsider manipulating rival factions kept resurfacing in westerns, crime films, and action stories.

IMDb

Perfect Strangers

The actual remake monster. The Italian film Perfetti Sconosciuti holds the Guinness World Record for most remade film, with 24 remakes in different languages. A dinner-party phone-sharing premise somehow became globally irresistible.

15 Cringey Moments in Otherwise Good Movies

Movies aren’t perfect, but we can excuse a few mistakes to understand the overall story. Even audience members, when retelling a movie or even a personal tale, can forget details that need clarifying. We prefer when it doesn’t happen, but understand when it does… although some scenes are just too much to bear.

This is due to them not being mistakes, but there by design. These moments give us second-hand embarrassment, or ‘cringe’ as it is known, due to how out of place they feel. These are movies we are fans of, but wished they had a few less scenes to make them perfect.

IMDb

The Godfather

Sonny’s exaggerated beating of Carlo, with visibly theatrical punches and dated choreography, looks unintentionally awkward in a film otherwise praised for realism and restraint.

IMDb

Avengers: Age of Ultron

Bruce Banner and Natasha Romanoff’s romance, especially the “hide the zucchini” flirting, felt forced inside an otherwise energetic superhero ensemble, if the weakest one of the lot.

IMDb

Wonder Woman

The climactic CGI-heavy Ares battle felt tonally disconnected from the grounded emotional and wartime themes that had driven much of the film.

IMDb

Star Wars: Return of the Jedi

The extended Ewok slapstick battle sequences felt overly cute and comedic during what should have been a high-stakes galactic finale.

IMDb

Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull

The “nuking the fridge” sequence is one of the film’s most mocked moments. Even by Indiana Jones adventure logic, surviving a nuclear blast inside a refrigerator felt absurdly cartoonish.

IMDb

Superman

The ending, where Superman reverses Earth’s rotation to turn back time, has long stood out as a strange leap in logic. In an otherwise beloved superhero classic, it felt oddly convenient and tonally bizarre.

IMDb

Django Unchained

Quentin Tarantino’s cameo as an Australian slaver is often singled out because the accent and delivery feel distracting. In a tightly controlled revenge western, the scene pulls attention away from the central tension.

IMDb

Braveheart

The romanticized love scene involving William Wallace and Princess Isabella is historically impossible and tonally awkward, especially because it arrives during a mostly serious war epic.

IMDb

The Breakfast Club

Allison’s makeover scene has long been divisive. In a film built around rejecting shallow labels, changing her appearance to gain approval is contradictory and awkwardly out of place.

IMDb

Leon: The Professional

Several scenes involving Mathilda’s emotional attachment to Léon have long made viewers uncomfortable. For all the themes covered in the thriller, that dynamic can feel tonally uneasy and distracting.

IMDb

Avatar

Jake Sully explaining his battle plans through heavily militarized “bro” dialogue before the final fight felt unusually blunt. For how visually visionary the movie can be, some dialogue moments sounded stiffer than the world around them.

IMDb

The Last Jedi

Leia surviving space exposure and pulling herself back to the ship with the Force divided many fans. In a dramatic war sequence, the visual looked unexpectedly surreal and out of left field, even if it pulls from established lore.

IMDb

Goodfellas

Tommy suddenly shooting Spider is brutal by design, but the exaggerated laughter and tonal snap into chaos can feel especially jarring in a movie otherwise carefully balancing dark humor and realism.

IMDb

Scarface

The infamous “Hey, man, you got a job!” delivery and some of the broader acting beats around Tony’s rise read as unexpectedly cheesy beside the film’s darker crime drama.

IMDb

Breakfast at Tiffany’s

Mickey Rooney’s portrayal of Mr. Yunioshi is widely criticized for its exaggerated yellowface caricature. In a romantic classic remembered for Audrey Hepburn and elegant style, that performance feels deeply out of place and uncomfortable today.

15 Big Details Movies Got Hilariously Wrong

We don’t expect movies to be perfect, but when crafting films with millions of dollars, you’d expect some fact checking to be happening. Alas, in the name of the narrative, these few factoids got lost in the sea. You might’ve not noticed them on your first watch, but once you know, you know.

Granted, if you’re not tech-savvy or aware of the inner workings of these facts, you might think to excuse the filmmakers. However, with the amount of money, people and influence these movies have, you’d think fact checking their scenes wouldn’t be an issue. But seemingly, it was.

IMDb

The Strangers

A widely mocked logic gap involves characters acting as if a nearly dead phone is unusable while charging. Even in 2008, corded phone use was common enough that the tension can feel artificially prolonged.

IMDb

Die Hard 2

The movie centers on planes circling Dulles under terrorist control, but aviation fans often point out nearby major airports existed. The film prioritizes suspense over realistic rerouting options during a major emergency.

IMDb

Ready Player One

The first challenge supposedly stumps millions for years until someone drives backward. Critics often argued a massive player base would realistically test glitches, reverse routes, or chaotic off-road strategies far earlier.

IMDb

G.I. Joe: The Rise of Cobra

Its Arctic climax drew ridicule for depicting huge ice masses sinking dramatically underwater. Since ice is less dense than liquid water, the visual looked spectacular but scientifically backwards.

IMDb

The Sound of Music

The Von Trapps flee across mountains toward supposed freedom, but geographically, Salzburg’s nearby alpine route would not lead them into Switzerland, but rather to Hitler’s summer home. The dramatic ending favors symbolism over actual escape logistics.

IMDb

Double Jeopardy

The thriller hinges on the false legal idea that someone can kill the same victim after already being convicted of their murder. Real double jeopardy protections do not work that way.

IMDb

The Dark Knight Rises

Viewers often joked about Gotham police surviving months trapped underground, then emerging for battle looking organized, healthy, and suspiciously clean-shaven. The visual undercut the realism Nolan’s trilogy usually tried to maintain.

IMDb

I Still Know What You Did Last Summer

The title implies immediate continuity, but the sequel takes place roughly a year after the original events, making the timeline joke a long-running fan nitpick. After all, what the killer knows is what they did two summers ago, not last summer.

IMDb

Superman IV: The Quest for Peace

Sharp-eyed viewers noticed the United Nations scene labels a delegate as representing “England,” even though the correct sovereign state seat would be the United Kingdom.

IMDb

X-Men: First Class

When Magneto visits Villa Gesell, Argentina, the background geography appears mountainous. Since Villa Gesell is a flat coastal city in Buenos Aires Province, locals quickly spotted the mismatch.

IMDb

The DUFF

The movie expects viewers to accept a star high school quarterback being treated like an ordinary struggling student. Critics saw the setup as exaggerated teen-movie logic rather than believable school athletics culture.

IMDb

High School Musical

Troy Bolton is framed as an elite basketball prospect, which led fans to joke about how his listed height and overall framing felt less like top-tier college recruiting reality.

IMDb

The Batman

Batman’s no-kill ethic often clashes with heavily armed vehicles across multiple films. Fans regularly debate how “non-lethal” philosophy gets murkier once machine guns and destructive pursuit vehicles enter the picture.

IMDb

Bridesmaids

Like many films and shows, it echoes the myth that missing-person reports require waiting periods. In reality, police can take immediate reports, especially when vulnerability or danger is involved.

IMDb

The Woman King

The film sparked debate for simplifying the Dahomey Kingdom’s historical relationship with the Atlantic slave trade. Critics argued its dramatic framing softened a more morally complex and documented history.

15 Times the Movie Gave Away the Plot Too Early

Some movies work incredibly hard to build mystery, suspense, or shocking twists, only to accidentally reveal the answer far earlier than intended. Sometimes it happens through obvious dialogue, suspicious editing, or even marketing decisions. In other cases, the movie practically tells viewers the ending outright. These moments do not always ruin the experience, though they can make certain twists feel less impactful on rewatch. Looking back, many famous films accidentally, or intentionally, telegraphed their biggest secrets much sooner than the filmmakers probably realized at the time.

IMDb

Shutter Island (2010) — Everyone Treats Teddy Strangely

Nearly every character behaves around Teddy in ways that strongly hint something is wrong with his reality.

IMDb

Spider-Man: Homecoming (2017) — Too Much Focus on Liz’s Dad

The movie subtly frames ordinary conversations in ways that practically scream the upcoming Vulture reveal.

IMDb

The Prestige (2006) — The Opening Narration Explains Everything

The movie literally tells audiences to pay attention to the method behind the illusion right from the beginning.

IMDb

The Sixth Sense (1999) — Malcolm Is Ignored Constantly

Once viewers notice that people rarely acknowledge Malcolm directly, the twist becomes much easier to predict.

IMDb

The Usual Suspects (1995) — Verbal’s Story Sounds Too Convenient

The entire narrative becomes suspicious because every detail perfectly benefits Verbal Kint’s version of events.

IMDb

The Village (2004) — Modern Language Slips Through

Tiny details in dialogue and behaviour subtly hint that the setting is not actually from the distant past.

IMDb

Who Framed Roger Rabbit (1988) — Judge Doom’s Voice Clues

Several small moments hint that Judge Doom is hiding something much stranger than audiences initially assume.

IMDB

Captain Marvel (2019) — The Skrulls Seem Too Sympathetic

The supposed villains behave far too reasonably early on for the movie’s original setup to fully work.

IMDb

Fight Club (1999) — Tyler Barely Interacts With Anyone

The lack of direct interaction between Tyler Durden and other characters becomes suspiciously early.

IMDb

Frozen (2013) — Hans Changes Too Fast

Hans becomes suspicious early because his personality shifts feel abrupt long before the reveal arrives.

IMDb

Glass Onion: A Knives Out Mystery (2022) — Miles Is Obviously an Idiot

The movie practically reveals the central joke early because Miles repeatedly exposes his own incompetence.

IMDb

Gone Girl (2014) — Amy’s Diary Feels Too Perfect

The diary entries become suspicious because they feel carefully constructed rather than emotionally authentic.

IMDb

Terminator 2: Judgment Day (1991) — The Marketing Revealed the Twist

The movie tries to hide Arnold Schwarzenegger’s true role early on, even though the trailers already spoiled everything.

IMDb

Psycho (1960) — Norman’s Conversations Feel Off

Norman Bates speaks about his mother in ways that become deeply revealing once the ending is known.

IMDb

Saw (2004) — The “Corpse” Never Moves

The camera repeatedly avoids focusing too carefully on the body lying in the room for obvious reasons later.

Spider-Noir Review: Spider-Man Does Whatever Bogie Can

This review contains light spoilers for Spider-Noir.

We still haven’t fully reckoned with what a miracle of a movie Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse is. That film introduced mass audiences to a new variation of Spider-Man who wasn’t Peter Parker, while putting the famously street-level, friendly neighborhood hero into a dimension-hopping story, one that also starred a Spider-Pig, a Spider-Robot, a Spider-Gwen, and a Spider-Gumshoe. Against all odds, Into the Spider-Verse not only gave us a delightful adventure with dazzling visuals and punchy gags, but it also managed to be a satisfying story about new kid Miles Morales.

Yet, despite Spider-Verse‘s success, the first spinoff series from the franchise seemed like a disposable lark at best, an IP-grubbing overextension at worst. We should have known better. Spider-Noir is a delightful bit of hard-boiled television, faithful to both its roots in comic books and film noir, while standing on its own.

In Spider-Noir, Nicolas Cage reprises his Spider-Verse role as a web-slinging hero who wears a black mask under his fedora, but this isn’t exactly the same character. Not only does Spider-Noir have a PG-13 edge, with some more overt violence and stronger curse words, but the show lacks any references to adventures with Miles and Gwen, and certainly any existence of a multiverse.

In fact, Spider-Noir isn’t really interested in shared universe nods at all, even if show runners Oren Uziel and Steve Lightfoot (and, to be sure, Cage himself) can’t resist pulling sequences from noirs such as The Lady from Shanghai or The Big Sleep. Instead, Spider-Noir tells a contained story about Ben Reilly (Cage), who once fought crime as the Spider, but after losing his beloved, now serves the almighty dollar as a cynical private investigator in post-World War II New York. Hired to investigate the burning of a mansion belonging to the Irish mobster Silvermane (Brendan Gleeson), named so for the streaks of grey in his hair, Ben finds himself pulled deeper into a web of danger.

Like any proper noir, a femme fatale keeps Ben involved, namely Cat Hardy (Li Jun Li), a singer at Silvermane’s club. However, when Ben discovers that the arsonist has superpowers like him, his search not only brings him back to a camp his platoon liberated during the war, but also refugees from that camp who have developed their own abilities, including the Sandman Flint Marko (Jack Huston), soft-hearted strong man Lonnie Lincoln (Abraham Popoola), and the theatrical electric user Dirk Leydon a.k.a. Megawatt (Andrew Lewis Caldwell). As much as Ben would rather leave that part of his past behind, his reporter friend Joe “Robbie” Robertson (Lamorne Morris) calls upon his help to stop Silvermane from building an army of supervillains.

Over-plotting is a hallmark of hard-boiled detective fiction, but unlike Raymond Chandler or Dashiell Hammett, Uziel and Lightfoot keep the story beats and motivations clear. However, they honor what came before not just with a few well-chosen homages, but by maintaining the spirit of the genre. Ben rarely feels like Peter Parker or any other costumed hero. But he does feel like Sam Spade, Philip Marlowe, or Johnny Farrell from Gilda, a man whose cynical exterior hides a heart of gold. With his drooping face and natural drawl, Cage makes for a natural sad-sack, his greased black hair only adding to the facade.

Spider-Noir further honors its genre with whip-smart dialogue, which sometimes goes beyond Bogie and Bacall to pay tribute to Cary Grant and Rosalind Russell on His Girl Friday. Even when inebriated and hopeless, Ben never misses a beat, downing opponents with his withering wit if his spider-powers aren’t in use.

Which happens more than one would think for a show about a Marvel superhero. It’s not just Ben’s reluctance to become the Spider again that keeps the superheroics to a minimum (nor is it a limited budget, which afflicts any show on MGM+ or Prime Video, Spider-Noir‘s home). Instead, one rarely feels like we need to see the Spider shooting webs or crawling walls, even when Ben puts back on his mask, because the story is solid enough. Ben makes for a compelling character, as do all the supporting figures around him. The mystery may not be particularly complex, but it unfolds at a pace that keeps us watching, especially in the twisty final chapter.

This isn’t to say that Spider-Noir does away with superhero fight scenes altogether. Most episodes have at least one, and they’re shot well enough. It’s just that Cage himself is the ultimate special effect, especially since Spider-Noir gives him plenty of space to have fun. As Ben Reilly goes through his investigation, he repeatedly finds himself needing to talk his way out of situations. Sometimes, he dons a goofy hat and silly glasses, à la Bogie in The Big Sleep; in other cases, a broad accent does the trick. Fifteen years ago, these bits would be shared on the internet as evidence that Cage is a terrible actor. Now, we know better, that they’re all strong choices from a compelling performer, and Spider-Noir gives us no reason to change our minds now.

Just as good is Spider-Noir‘s supporting cast, particularly Morris and Gleeson. As viewers of New Girl can attest, Morris excels at playing a weirdo who seems to be in his own world, giving a sly grin as if he’s enjoying an inside joke shared only by himself. That quality translates well to Robbie, a reporter who knows more than anyone else (including Ben’s identity as the Spider), but constantly has to deal with arrogant editors, bully cops, and general systemic racism (which Spider-Noir acknowledges with more bluntness than one would expect). Morris has fun with the role without ever sacrificing Robbie’s integrity, finally doing justice to the longtime Spider-Man supporting character.

For his part, Silvermane differs wildly from his comic book counterpart, lacking a robotic body or a background in the Italian mafia (or Maggia, to use the term required by Marvel editorial). Instead, he’s an Irish immigrant willing to do anything to avoid the poverty he experienced as a child in his homeland. An actor with Gleeson’s presence could easily phone in the role and still be magnetic. But Gleeson deftly plays the part of the heavy, rarely actually raising his hand or his voice to threaten his underlings, even those who can shrug off bullets or shoot lightning. Instead, he rules with soft eyes and quiet threats, making him a compelling match for the Spider.

When relying on its dialogue and performances, Spider-Noir satisfies. It slips some when it veers too far into other genres, particularly when mad scientists enter the story towards the back half. Amy Aquino and Andrew Robinson are always welcome on our screens, but the shift to Universal horror is one ingredient too many, as is a misjudged sequence that feels more like the Mysterio hallucination in Spider-Man: Far From Home than it does anything staring Jimmy Cagney.

These missteps are few, far less than one would expect from what otherwise seemed like one more unnecessary addition to the superhero television glut. For the most part, Spider-Noir stands on its own, reminding us not just about the fun of superheroes but about the gloomy pleasures of film noir.

Spider-Noir streams in its entirely on May 25, 2026, on MGM+ and on May 27, 2026, on Prime Video.

The 15 Weirdest Ways 2000s Movies Tried to Seem “Cool”

The 2000s had a very specific idea of what looked cool. If a movie had leather jackets, slow-motion walking, aggressive editing, neon lighting, nu-metal soundtracks, or endless attitude, Hollywood often assumed it had cracked the formula. The problem was that trying too hard usually aged faster than anything else.

Many films chased trends instead of building timeless style, stuffing themselves with edgy visuals, forced swagger, and overdesigned action meant to feel modern and rebellious. Some still became cult favorites (albeit ironically), but others now feel like time capsules of manufactured ‘cool.’ These movies did everything possible to look stylish, only to prove that trying too hard rarely ages well.

IMDb

Tripple-X

The movie tried to make extreme sports and anti-establishment swagger feel like the future of action cinema, but much of its forced edginess now feels like peak manufactured cool.

IMDb

Catwoman

Hyper-stylized editing, leather-heavy aesthetics, and awkwardly seductive basketball flirting were all meant to feel sleek and edgy, but the result became unintentionally bizarre.

IMDb

Torque

Torque pushed motorcycles, exaggerated CGI stunts, and MTV-style editing so aggressively that it often felt more interested in attitude than believable action.

IMDb

The Fast and the Furious: Tokyo Drift

The movie leaned hard into drifting culture, neon visuals, and outsider swagger, but some of its dialogue and exaggerated posturing now feel distinctly mid-2000s, in a bad way.

IMDb

S.W.A.T.

Tactical slow motion, hyper-serious bravado, and glossy action framing tried to sell elite-cop coolness, even when the dialogue often felt like pure macho packaging.

IMDb

Ballistic: Ecks vs. Sever

The movie threw in sleek guns, emotionless assassins, and ultra-serious style, but its attempt at icy action coolness became one of its most mocked traits.

IMDb

Charlie’s Angels: Full Throttle

Its nonstop needle drops, fashion-forward action poses, and exaggerated pop-culture energy constantly chased coolness so hard that it often overwhelmed the actual story.

IMDb

Stealth

Jet fighters, hacker aesthetics, and glossy military-tech swagger were framed as futuristic cool, but the film’s seriousness made much of it feel overly corporate.

IMDb

Daredevil

The film leaned into nu-metal, stylized angst, and edgy rooftop brooding to feel dark and mature, but much of that attitude now feels aggressively of its era.

IMDb

Swordfish

Cybercrime coolness, flashy editing, leather-clad attitude, and exaggerated hacker mystique all tried to scream sophistication, but many viewers saw more style than substance.

IMDb

The Matrix Reloaded

Its leather aesthetics, philosophical monologues, and increasingly elaborate action pushed sleek futurism even further, though some viewers felt the self-serious cool began overtaking clarity.

IMDb

Mission: Impossible II

John Woo’s slow motion, wind-blown hair, sunglasses, and dramatic poses gave it relentless style, but the heavy cool-factor often overshadowed grounded espionage tension. Certainly not a worthy follow up.

IMDb

Gone in 60 Seconds

Fast cuts, leather jackets, and hyper-polished car-culture swagger tried hard to make every theft feel iconic, sometimes at the expense of realism.

IMDb

DOA: Dead or Alive

The movie leaned on glossy beach visuals, exaggerated action posing, and videogame-style attitude, pushing cool aesthetics harder than believable storytelling.

IMDb

Street Fighter: The Legend of Chun-Li

Dark grit, moody action framing, and overly serious reinvention tried to make the franchise feel sleek and modern, but the forced tone rarely landed naturally.

Spider-Noir: Should You Watch it in Black and White or Color?

Spider-Noir may be about a guy who can shoot webs fighting people with electrical powers and super-strength, but it is fundamentally a riff on noir films. Literally “dark film,” film noir was the term that French critics applied to the crime movies that Hollywood made from the 1930s and through the early ’50s, movies such as The Third Man, Double Indemnity, and The Big Heat.

A cursory look at the trailers for Spider-Noir emphasize the show’s connection to those movies. Even when he’s wearing a mask, Ben Reilly a.k.a. the Spider (Nicolas Cage) keeps his fedora and trench coat on, just like Humphrey Bogart and Glen Ford before him. The show’s supervillains don’t wear tights and don’t have robot limbs, choosing the types of suits and flatcaps donned by Sidney Greenstreet or Richard Widmark.

The Spider-Noir trailers also match the color of classic noirs—or, rather, the lack thereof. MGM+ and Prime Video will stream Spider-Noir in two modes, black and white or technicolor. So what’s a true believer to do? Swing across the color spectrum with the Spider or brood with Ben Reilly in black and white?

The answer is slightly more complicated than similar questions posed by Mad Max: Fury Road or Godzilla Minus One, films that released grayscale versions after the standard color prints first played in theaters. Both of those movies came to audiences in full color, vibrant color in the case of Fury Road, and were shot by filmmakers who used the full palette. Takashi Yamazaki may have been gesturing towards the original 1954 movie with Godzilla Minus One, but the blocking, costuming, and lighting of that movie were designed with the expectation of color. Thus, the black and white versions of the movies play like cover songs: not without value or pleasures, but largely meaningless without the original.

That’s not the case with Spider-Noir. Even if the fact that the opening titles play in black and white, regardless of the stream you’re watching, doesn’t tip you off, it’s clear that Spider-Noir was designed with black and white in mind. Showrunners Oren Uziel and Steve Lightfoot employ directors who know how to make use of shadow and strong contrast. The Dutch angles that appear in every episode aren’t just nods to filmmakers such as Fritz Lang and Robert Siodmak; they’re tools to keep the visuals dynamic without colors.

The black and white print helps sell the tone of Spider-Noir, which functions much more like a hard-boiled detective story than it does a superhero tale. Even though the series, and Cage in particular, cannot help but gesture towards Bogart and Orson Welles, it largely works as a continuation of the genre, not just a self-satisfied set of allusions. For that reason, the shades of grey underscore the series’ worldview.

But this isn’t to say that Spider-Noir doesn’t work in color at all. Instead of just shooting the series in the same flat colors as every other series, the directors work to emulate the bright technicolor of a Hitchcock movie. Everything is oversaturated and unreal, making the show not only visually distinct, but also as heightened as the black and white version.

So, what’s the best way to watch Spider-Noir? To this writer, black and white is clearly better. But the color stream has its charms too, and the showrunners gave it enough character to be distinct from every other show on television right now. You’ll lose something offered by the black and white stream when you choose the color route, but you’ll gain some unique visuals that make for their own satisfying experience.

In the end, the choice is yours. But unlike every noir hero from Bogie to Ben Reilly, you don’t have to wallow in self-loathing if you make the wrong decision. You can just click to the other stream and let Spider-Man do the brooding.

Spider-Noir streams in color and black and white on MGM+ on May 25, 2026, and on Prime Video on May 27, 2026.

Rivals Season 2 Puts Its Female Characters Front and Center

The following contains spoilers for the first four episodes of Rivals season 2.

The first season of Rivals rightfully generated a lot of buzz for its scandalous sensibilities — the series opens with a couple joining the Mile High Club in an airplane toilet as a champagne bottle overflows outside and pretty much just proceeds from there. It was full of attractive male leads, most of whom all took their shirts off at various points during its run. It unabashedly embraced the idea that television is — and should be — fun. Now the buzzy bonkbuster is back for another round, and, to be clear, Rivals season 2 is still full of all the elements that made its first so entertaining. There’s sex, booze, betrayal, petty jealousy, and outstanding 1980s needle drops. (Not to mention a glorious array of outsize shoulder pads.)

But while the show’s second outing is no less titillating, it is a bit more serious, adding some necessary emotional depth to every major character and complicating pretty much every narrative arc. But what’s most satisfying about Rivals season 2 is the way it moves beyond the idea of simply being a gleefully naughty show featuring hot men. And it does so by very purposefully putting its female characters in the spotlight. 

“We had a very female writer’s room. We are very female in the way we often think,” showrunner Dominic Treadwell-Collins laughingly tells Den of Geek. “We ran a show called EastEnders for a very long time here that was really a show that is all about the women. And we’ve brought that sensibility to Rivals. It’s in the book as well, of course. But really, we’ve spent a lot of time through seasons 1 and 2 talking about the female gaze, and the camera thinking from the female point of view. I think remarkably few shows do that.” 

Rivals has always had a particularly feminine sensibility, from its focus on emotional arcs to its overt love of romance. But this season, the women of Rutshire get to drive the story on their own terms. 

“I think in season 1, loads of things happen at the end, which gave us some great hooks to let these women step forward, but it’s really all about the consequences of people’s choices,” executive producer Alexander Lamb says. “Tony’s behavior impacts Monica, which brings Monica to the floor and she gets great scenes like that moment in the first episode when she tells Tony he’s embarrassed himself and that won’t be happening again. Maud and Declan. He told her he watched her play, but he didn’t. It doesn’t matter how hot you are; get out. You feel for them, like you’re with Lizzie when she’s trying to be a good person, thinking she shouldn’t be having an affair. You root for all of them.”

Perhaps this shouldn’t surprise anyone who is familiar with Dame Jilly Cooper’s novels, which give their female characters free rein to be as selfish and driven by their own desires (physical or otherwise) as the men around them. 

“The women are just as integral to the story as the men, you know,” Victoria Smurfit, who plays Maud O’Hara, says. “A woman wrote it originally. I think it’s very exciting that they put a lot of the women front and center, but it is all there in the book already. And when you read a lot of Jilly [Cooper’s] stuff, all the men are sexy and cool and fabulous and powerful, and all the women are sexy and naughty, but they’re equally driven by their wants, no matter what those looked like. And the way Dominic Trevor Collins and Laura Wade write it — with Jilly’s blessing — is with an eyeball to to now, to see it through the lens of what’s going on now without it being too disparate from what we understand. It’s equal opportunity for all of us.”

While almost every major female character gets her chance to shine in season 2, it is Sarah Stratton, the trophy mistress-turned-wife of a Tory politician who longs for a TV career of her own that completely steals the show. In season 1, her story largely revolved around her sex life, namely an ill-advised affair with playboy Rupert Campbell-Black. But in Rivals’ second outing, Sarah’s arc gets much more complicated as she attempts to juggle her marriage, growing career, and a surprise pregnancy. 

“I’m so lucky because I’ve always wanted to take a character like this and make them so that people want to root for them rather than [tamp] them down in the name of making them likeable,” Emily Atack, who plays Sarah, says. “She makes these terrible decisions. She can be quite conniving and manipulative. She uses her sexuality. She will do anything to get the things that she wants. But I think the more you look into Sarah, the more you understand those behaviors a little more, and understand that she does it because she’s trying to survive in a male-dominated world. She wants more, and this is the path that is open to her.”

Atack finds a tremendous amount of sympathy in Sarah’s journey, acknowledging her flaws as she struggles to hold her rapidly spiraling life together. (She’s also, not for nothing, a gifted comedian, and gets many of the season’s funniest moments.) 

“I wanted people to identify with Sarah,” she says. “I owe it to women out there who are complicated and who are like me. I really want to do them a service, and I want them to love Sarah and root for her. And know that it’s okay to identify with her. We’re all flawed. We all make terrible decisions. I think I wanted to show that doesn’t make you evil. I wanted her vulnerability to come through. In the first [season], she’s a bit colder. But in season 2, they wrote all these brilliant storylines for her to show why he is the way she is and why she’s doing what she’s doing.”

In a lesser show, a character like Atack’s Sarah would likely be little more than a caricature, a fact that her co-star, Chris Oliver, who plays Sarah’s pompous yet strangely insecure Corinthian chat show co-host James Vereker, is quick to point out. 

“Characters like [Sarah] could be so one-dimensional,” he says. “But in season 1, you get to see this really ambitious, clever woman, only things just don’t work out how she hoped. And in season 2, you can see really clearly, how she’s dealing with the fallout from those decisions, and there’s such pathos and humor and drive in her actions.”

For Oliver, one of the most interesting aspects of Rivals is its ability to look at its 1980s setting and characters through a modern lens, and the ways that perspective can still reflect the present we’re all living in now. 

“The show is set in the 1980s…it’s a time that’s not too long ago, so you can still relate to it, and have some fun with the crassness and the naughtiness and all that,” he says. “But we’re also able to really look at how things were back then. It begs the question: How far have we come with certain things? Are things changing? I think in season 1, James was a kind of comic relief. But in season 2, I think we see how his disregard for other people’s emotions actually affects them. When I saw it back for the first time, I was actually really affected by it because you realize that actually I am representing a kind of passive, careless, toxic masculinity in this story, which was not only relevant in the 80s, but I think is probably still quite relevant today.”

The first four episodes of Rivals season 2 are available to stream on Hulu and Disney+ now.

Vought Rising Trailer: The Greatest Generation Gets The Boys’ Treatment

The disappointing fifth and final season of The Boys suffered from a myriad of problems. According to creator Eric Kripke, one issue was that the series was just too darn timely. How could he have guessed that the absolutely absurd moment when Homelander has a gaudy vision that convinces him he is God would be trumped by the President sharing an AI image of himself as the divine?

The first trailer for The Boys prequel series Vought Rising seems to promise a series devoid of such issues. The show goes all the way back to 1950, and seems to present a younger, more earnest Soldier Boy (still played by a 48-year-old Jensen Ackles), who truly wants to serve the flag instead of himself. Injected with Compound V, Soldier Boy joins Bombsight (Mason Dye), Torpedo (Will Hochman), and Private Angel (Elizabeth Posey). But as anyone who has seen The Boys knows that Soldier Boy’s real partner is Clara Vought, played by a returning Aya Cash.

The Vought Rising trailer mostly concerns itself with superheroes, blood-splatter, and ironic needle-drops, the sort of thing you’d expect from a spinoff of The Boys. But the trailer hints at the show’s plans to turn the franchise’s satirical eye toward the greatest generation.

The current president was only a four-year-old at the time, but the odious worldview that drove his administration and has been mocked on The Boys was certainly present at the time—and not just among the Nazis. Racism, eugenic theories, and work camps for those deemed lesser are all part of American policies.

The Boys has previously gestured at the similarities between American idealism and Nazism, most obviously in the reveal that Clara Vought was Klara Risinger, wife of Nazi geneticist and inventor of Compound V, Frederick Vought. Frederick gave his wife the compound, and when they immigrated to the U.S. as part of Operation Paperclip, Clara became the patriotic superhero Liberty. After her racist crimes were exposed, Liberty went into hiding, only to reemerge decades later as Stormfront, using a codename derived from white supremacist jargon.

By looking at the Eisenhower Era, Vought Rising allows The Boys to remind viewers that the problems of the present day aren’t new, that even in its best moments, the U.S. flirts with fascism and authoritarianism.

The trailer hints at another way Vought Rising will critique America’s past, by following the perspective of Black characters. Although we don’t get much about KiKi Layne’s character, other than her connection to Soldier Boy, we do see a character played by Jorden Myrie getting injected with Compound V and gaining superpowers.

Surely, Myrie’s character will be involved in this universe’s version of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study and other forms of medical apartheid in the United States, in which American scientists performed experiments on Black people. Not only will this plot point allow the series to draw stronger connections between the United States and Nazi Germany, but also explore a different side of the American superhero myth.

Unless some historian releases a new book that totally changes the way we think about the 1950s, Kripke won’t have to worry about the news one-upping the stories in Vought Rising. Instead, he’ll just have to worry about the greatest threat with any Boys series: people who don’t get the joke, and refuse to learn the lessons of the satires.

Vought Rising streams on Prime Video in 2027.

Mandalorian and Grogu: Star Wars Forgot Why the Cantina Scene Matters

This article contains minor spoilers for The Mandalorian and Grogu.

At the climax of The Mandalorian and Grogu‘s first act, the odds stack up against Din Djarin. A horde of monsters floods into the gladiatorial arena to which he’s been sent, forcing Mando and Rotta the Hutt, the shockingly ripped son of Jabba the Hutt, to fight against a giant lizard in a leather vest, some unsettling worm thing, a gloopy dude with giant eyes, and other beasties.

At first, the fight scene just sucks, one of many indifferently-shot action sequences in The Mandalorian and Grogu. The monsters have neat shapes and move around in a way that could be compelling, but they’re all the color of old dishwater, various shades of green and brown and grey. But then you notice that the floor of the arena has a checkered pattern. And then you see the giant lizard guy smash its opponent on the ground, and you realize that these are the monsters from Dejarik, the holochess game that R2-D2 and Chewbecca play in the first Star Wars.

And you wonder, how did a franchise that once had incredible creature effects sink to this level?

If it’s been a while, or if you just watched Mando & Grogu and you have forgotten what good monsters look like, go back and watch the Dejarik part of Star Wars. The beasties are only on screen for a couple of seconds, but they’re immediately distinctive. The Kintan strider (the club-wielding neckless dude) is bright yellow. The Mantellian Savrip (leather-vest lizard) has rich green skin, which didn’t blend into the brown of his clothes. The molator (think Squidward, but melting from toxic waste, like that hoodlum in Robocop) seems to glow neon blue.

In Star Wars, we only see the Dejarik pieces clearly for one insert shot. The rest of the time, they’re just small pieces sitting in front of R2 and Chewie, part of the scenery. And yet, despite their small size and their lack of opacity (they are holographic, after all), the monsters stand out and stick in your memory. Animator Phil Tippett and his team made the creatures so amazing that despite being on screen for less than a minute, and only being the focus of the screen for mere seconds, the Dejarik pieces have become favorites, leading to their inclusion in Mando & Grogu.

Even more impressive is the fact that the Dejarik scene isn’t even the best creature feature moment in Star Wars. The Cantina scene is the stuff of legend, and with good reason. It begins with some Y-headed thing popping into the frame, his glowing yellow bug eyes offsetting the shadow. The camera cuts around to show us the other inhabitants: a yeti with the head of a spider, a couple of astronauts, a bat guy demanding his drink, the freaking Devil is there, just hanging out.

Like so many of the best parts of Star Wars, the denizens of the Cantina were assembled by accident and necessity. Reshoots and budget constraints forced make-up artist Rick Baker to just grab what he had lying around his shop to met George Lucas‘ demands for more odd aliens. Thus we get a ton of interesting-looking guys who show up without names or backstory. They are just there to look cool, build atmosphere, and flesh out the world.

The scene plays like a grab bag of random weirdos, and it plays perfectly. There’s a reason that everything from the Halloween town in The Nightmare Before Christmas to the spa from Spirited Away to the Troll Market in Hellboy II to even Star Trek (remember the bar that Bones visits in The Search for Spock?) all follow the Cantina model.

Yet, despite being chock-full of aliens, The Mandalorian and Grogu never comes close to the Cantina scene. To be sure, a couple of the creatures look cool. The puppeteering of Grogu and the Babus Frik remains incredible, and the climax prominently features a giant white snake that is genuinely impressive. But almost all of the creatures are like the Dejarik pieces seen in the gladiator arena: dull and forgettable.

Part of the problem stems from the movie’s color-grading. Mando & Grogu may have graduated from Disney+ to the big screen, but it still looks made for streaming, with the colors all flattened the same shade of grade, better to account for TVs and phones. As a result, the Dejarik monsters, the monkey played by Martin Scorsese, the Hutts, the ‘droids, and everyone else has a pallete of grey, green, and brown.

The other part is that Star Wars is rarely about anything but Star Wars anymore, which is why the Dejarik monsters are there in the first place. Lucas’ demands and Baker’s desparation to fill out the world left plenty of space for surprise and imagination, heightened by the fact that Kenner produced toys of guys like Hammerhead, the slug-like guy in the Cantina. But now, Hammerhead has a proper name (Momaw Nadon) and a backstory and a Wookieepedia entry, so that his next appearance won’t be a surprise, but rather a callback to make everyone who knows about Momaw feel very smart.

Star Wars used to be filled with wonder and surprise. The Mandalorian and Grogu proves that the franchise is now about trotting out creatures you already know and understand, made as bland and ugly as possible.

The Mandalorian and Grogu is now playing in theaters.

Directive 8020 Isn’t Living up to The Dark Picture Anthology’s Hype 

Supermassive Games’ Dark Pictures Anthology series takes on heavy themes about the darker aspects of humanity, free will, and morality. Players learn to make decisions for survival on the fly and deal with the outcomes of those decisions, sometimes impacted by choices of characters centuries before them. 

The first game of the franchise, Man of Medan, was released in 2019, and the world has since expanded across five games of pure terror, with fan-favorite narrator, The Curator, walking players through numerous puzzles and questions in hopes of finding out the central mystery that connects back to the mysterious narrator himself. 

The recently-released fifth installment of the series, Directive 8020, takes place into a new outer space setting. In a mission to save a dying Earth, the colony ship Cassiopeia travels 12 lightyears away to Tau Ceti f, a planet that offers humanity hope. When the ship crashes on the planet, leaving the crew stranded, they come to the horrifying realization that they are not alone. Faced with their dire reality, the crew must escape a shape-shifting alien life form that turns them against each other. 

Now, some players are voicing their concerns about the direction of the franchise with the creative decisions in Directive 8020, which differ from the usual beloved action-driven format. 

The Dark Pictures Anthology series has provided a unique action-based player choice game format that invites players to play as some of the protagonists of compelling horror stories, allowing them to live through their biggest horror movie fantasies. A shared multiplayer decision-making experience, the franchise tailors its player experience around community, sharing the controller, and making decisions that affect your friends. The experience at times invokes the same rage as “Draw 4” in UNO, when your friend puts you in a do-or-die scenario that could have been avoided with a choice to react calmly, not with distrust. 

The execution of this concept, along with some unique storytelling mechanics, has led to the franchise’s increase in popularity with many fans regarding its third game, House of Ashes, as the creative peak. 

However, that leads to concern that the franchise may have hit a minor speedbump. Directive 8020 currently has mixed reviews on Steam, with 874 positive and 504 negative reports. The overall consensus has rated it as a good game, but lacking in the continuous tension that made the franchise so notable.  

“Instead of ‘The Thing – In Space,’ it’s more of a stealth game with few good ideas,” a user wrote on Steam. “The only part I really liked was the setting itself and contacting the crew members and [seeing] how they respond. Sadly, it’s another horror game ruined by bad gameplay and a mediocre story.”

The lack of action-based choices, especially in a crew of physically fit astronauts, isn’t the best choice for the game. With most of the options being sneaking and running, there is a distinct lack of offensive gameplay that isn’t typical of Dark Pictures.  

There are further complaints about the frequency of the stealth scenes, which players say took away from the player experience. Character interactions and relationships feel weaker than in past games, especially in a storyline that prioritizes character relationships. Reddit users on r/DarkPicturesAnthology commented on the lack of depth of the characters, who feel bland and display little development, despite the trait development system that affects choices. 

The emphasis on building character relationships is lost with the weak conversation choices among characters. The paranoia that should be involved in an Alien meets Body Snatchers-like scenario is missing from the gameplay. 

Directive 8020 marks the start of season two of the Dark Pictures Anthology. While it feels like Supermassive Games decided on a safe beginning, there is still plenty room for adventure. 

Hopefully, the next installment has enough action to make Lara Croft look like an amateur. 

Directive 8020 is now available on Steam, PlayStation 5, and Xbox Series X/S.

Ranking Every Season of The Boys

This article contains spoilers for The Boys season 5.

The future of The Boys is in the past. Now that the show is over, we can look forward to a prequel series called Vought Rising that will explore the adventures of Soldier Boy, Bombsight, Liberty, and a host of other new characters in the 1950s, but until then, we can also look back at The Boys itself, as season 5 has marked the end of the mothership show on Prime Video.

Butcher and the gang gave us five seasons of absolute chaos to treasure forever, along with endless memes and edits to suit any mood. And although it will remain a travesty that Antony Starr didn’t scoop up every Emmy for his performance as Homelander, he sure did give it 1000% playing one of the most maniacal TV villains of all time.

Right, never mind the bollocks, let’s look back at every season of The Boys and crown a champion…

5. Season 5

Arguably, the final season of The Boys was its weakest. Fans generally weren’t happy with the pacing, which spent too much time setting up the franchise’s next spinoff and too little trying to capture the razor-sharp satire of previous seasons. Unfortunately, by the time season 5 emerged, our reality had become far too stupid to effectively satirize and, as a result, The Boys was running on fumes.

This season set up a final showdown between Butcher and Homelander, one that had been promised for years. After being unable to use the long-in-gestation Supe virus against him, Butcher looked to Kimiko to take on Soldier Boy’s chest blast powers in an effort to suck Homelander’s away and leave him a vulnerable human they could easily beat.

There were happy endings aplenty for many of the show’s characters, including Hughie and Annie, but sadly, a few of the core “good guys” lost their lives by the time the series wrapped, including Butcher’s sweet old dog, Terror. Ultimately, the finale was a good enough sendoff for the show, but there was an overarching sense that seasons 4 and 5 were stretching out a single season of storytelling.

4. Season 4

The wheels came off a bit during this season. Though The Boys was still must-watch weekly viewing, the show was starting to feel like it was running out of compelling ideas, despite a worthy exploration of an America on the brink of societal and political collapse. There was also some uneven pacing as season 4 set up a final showdown between Homelander and The Boys, rather than embracing a more satisfyingly contained arc.

Still, there was a lot to love in season 4. Butcher had been living on the edge for a while, but finally had to face his own mortality. Alt-right Supe Firecracker was recruited at TruthCon, and actress Valorie Curry would go on to become a fantastic addition to the cast. A killer episode also had Homelander return to the Vought lab where he was once experimented on, producing some of the most tense and upsetting scenes of the entire series.

The Gen V virus crossover was a little shaky, and Joe Kessler being a figment of Billy Butcher’s imagination led to a fairly underwhelming guest-starring role for Jeffrey Dean Morgan, but season 4 was basically fine overall, just not as good as previous seasons.

3. Season 1

The first season of The Boys was a fresh breath of diabolical air. It arrived with spectacular timing, as we were meeting Butcher and the gang and getting drawn into the razor-sharp satire of the show just after Avengers: Endgame had practically sewn up the Marvel Cinematic Universe. It felt like it was destined to happen this way. The Boys was a spoonful of medicine, forcing the MCU sugar not just down, but all the way out. A much-needed meta commentary on superhero worship, it deconstructed the myths of costumed saviours and stuck a middle finger up at anyone who thought that absolute power wouldn’t corrupt absolutely in a way that even Zack Snyder wouldn’t dare to explore.

Season 1 was also packed with iconic moments that would drive the show’s narrative all the way into the final season. Hughie’s rage and heartbreak after A-Train kills his girlfriend, Robin. Starlight realizing that being a superhero under Vought’s thumb is a poisoned chalice. The plane crash sequence, where Homelander abandons passengers to their deaths. Homelander lasering Madelyn Stillwell and then showing Butcher that his wife Becca is not only alive but is raising Homelander’s son.

All fantastic stuff, and a strong start to an irreverent series that would capture the imagination of an audience who didn’t know it yet, but were about to experience something called “superhero fatigue.”

2. Season 3

Season 3 is battling with season 2 for the top spot here, as The Boys was on fire across both seasons! This one started off with a bang when that unforgettable Termite penis explosion sequence unfolded. It also brought along some fascinating new ideas with the introduction of the Compound V variant, V24. Temporary superpowers changed the game for Butcher and Hughie, but the risks were soon revealed to be huge.

The revival of Soldier Boy, along with the revelations about his brutal history, also added some serious punch. Jensen Ackles’s toxic, frozen-in-time Captain America knock-off gave us a disturbing glimpse into Vought’s past, and the fights between him, Butcher, and Homelander in the present were fantastic. The fact that Soldier Boy and Butcher nearly beat Homelander together was thrilling, but Ryan’s attempts to build a relationship with his dad really threw a spanner in the works. Of course, there was also “Herogasm,” one of the most bonkers episodes of television ever made!

Exploring drug addiction and America’s alternate history during the Cold War, all while completing Maeve’s redemption arc and teasing a powerful Supe in the White House, The Boys was firing on all cylinders in season 3.

1. Season 2

Arguably, Aya Cash’s villainous Stormfront, a.k.a. Liberty, a.k.a. Clara Vought, was the joint-best addition to The Boys cast along with Soldier Boy, which is probably why she’ll be reprising the character in the franchise’s Vought Rising prequel series. The Nazi Supe was truly abominable, and her romance with Homelander was so cringe-inducing, especially as some predicted she would eventually be revealed as his biological mother. Ryan taking her down was so close to being a celebratory moment, until it was clear he’d accidentally killed his own mother in the process.

There were a bunch of terrific episodes in season 2, but ultimately, it really walked a steady road to its payoff like no other season. Of course, it still had its brilliant moments: Homelander pushing Ryan off the roof like a confident mother bird, only for him to hit the ground with a sickening sound. Kimiko, Starlight, and Maeve teaming up to take the piss out of Endgame‘s forced “girl power” scene. The sudden courtroom head-popping sequence, followed by the reveal of Victoria Neuman as a Supe. Homelander having a sexual encounter with himself via a shapeshifter. The Deep’s gill hallucinations. But nearly all of them served the story. They weren’t just there for shock value.

The pacing was tight, and the satire exploring the insidious creep of fascism fully landed, setting the stage for a bombastic season 3 that could take bigger swings.

Disagree with this ranking? As always, let us know in the comments!

14 Actors Who Chose Quality Over Quantity

Actors, like any other person, need to work to pay the bills. Sure, a lot of them have a lot more money than the average person, but that isn’t true for all performers, much less at the start of their careers. And yet, there are a few actors that, once they gained some renown, decided to be more picky on the films they starred in.

Not all of the films they chose were instant classics, but that’s not why they chose them. These are actors clearly working their craft to the best of their ability, searching for roles that challenge them. They may not have starred in plenty of films, but the filmography they are in was worth it.

IMDb

Daniel Day-Lewis

Day-Lewis famously disappears for years between projects, carefully selecting demanding roles instead of maintaining constant output, yet still became one of cinema’s most acclaimed actors.

IMDb

Leonardo DiCaprio

DiCaprio gradually shifted toward fewer, prestige-focused collaborations with directors like Martin Scorsese and Christopher Nolan rather than chasing nonstop commercial releases.

IMDb

Tom Hanks

Although extremely successful commercially, Hanks carefully avoided oversaturating audiences and consistently balanced mainstream popularity with respected dramatic performances throughout his long career.

IMDb

Jodie Foster

Foster frequently stepped away from acting for years at a time, preferring selective projects and directing work over constantly appearing in major studio films.

IMDb

Denzel Washington

Washington built a career around carefully chosen dramatic roles and character-driven stories, maintaining prestige across decades without appearing in an overwhelming number of films annually.

IMDb

Frances McDormand

McDormand has long prioritized unusual scripts and acclaimed filmmakers over blockbuster visibility, resulting in a smaller but consistently respected body of work.

IMDb

Gene Hackman

Hackman avoided excessive franchise work and eventually retired entirely, leaving behind a filmography filled mostly with critically respected performances instead of endless studio output.

IMDb

Michelle Pfeiffer

Pfeiffer often turned down projects and took lengthy breaks from Hollywood, maintaining a carefully curated career rather than maximizing sheer screen appearances.

IMDb

Cate Blanchett

Blanchett balanced prestige dramas, stage work, and occasional franchise appearances while maintaining an unusually consistent reputation for high-quality performances across genres.

IMDb

Cillian Murphy

Murphy spent years avoiding traditional celebrity culture and carefully selecting projects, eventually becoming a major leading man without flooding theaters with constant releases.

IMDb

Amy Adams

Adams built her reputation through selective dramatic and character-focused performances rather than appearing in as many commercial projects as possible.

IMDb

Philip Seymour Hoffman

Hoffman consistently gravitated toward challenging material and respected directors, creating one of modern cinema’s most admired filmographies despite relatively limited mainstream blockbuster presence.

IMDb

Tilda Swinton

Swinton frequently chooses eccentric independent films, art-house projects, and unusual collaborations instead of pursuing maximum commercial exposure or conventional Hollywood stardom.

IMDb

Viggo Mortensen

After The Lord of the Rings massively raised his profile, Mortensen deliberately focused on smaller, respected projects rather than aggressively chasing blockbuster franchise fame.

15 Movies, Shows & Games With Excessive Extra Lore Study Required

Entertainment products having deep lore is always a good thing, since there is a lot for audiences to enjoy. The problem comes when these pieces of media become so big, so convoluted, that you need long study sessions just to understand the basics.

This isn’t limited to any piece of media: movies, TV shows and even Video Games do this, with their narratives expanded to unexpected lengths. Here, we have just a few of the most egregious examples, so prepare yourself if you want to get into any of them.

IMDb

Halo 5: Guardians

Halo 5 drops players into a universe already packed with expanded lore from earlier games, novels, and character arcs, making parts of its conflict harder to fully appreciate without prior franchise knowledge.

IMDb

The Book of Boba Fett

The series works better if you already know Boba Fett from the original Star Wars films, then also follow major setup and overlapping character arcs from The Mandalorian.

IMDb

Dark Souls III

Its story heavily references earlier Souls titles through cryptic dialogue, repeated locations, and symbolic callbacks, leaving players to connect major lore threads with minimal direct explanation.

IMDb

Avengers: Endgame

Endgame pays off years of MCU storytelling, but its emotional weight depends heavily on understanding earlier Marvel films, recurring characters, and long-running Infinity Saga relationships.

IMDb

Scary Movie

Even parody works better with homework here. The franchise always leaned on viewers recognizing horror and pop-culture references, so the upcoming revival will likely carry baggage from both prior Scary Movie films and newer genre targets.

IMDb

The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey

The Hobbit films stand alone, but much of their larger context is clearer if viewers already know Tolkien lore and how the trilogy connects backward into The Lord of the Rings.

YouTube/World of Warcraft

World of Warcraft

Warcraft lore stretches across strategy games, novels, expansions, and major events that are not always fully explained inside one campaign or questline, particularly when game patches outright remove content.

IMDb

Elden Ring

Its lore is deliberately fragmented across item descriptions, NPC dialogue, and environmental clues, pushing players to reconstruct major history from scattered details. Most players seek the aid of YouTubers in order to grasp the lore.

IMDb

Daredevil: Born Again

The show exists inside broader Marvel continuity while also reviving characters from Netflix’s Daredevil, making outside context especially useful for relationships, history, and returning conflicts.

IMDb

Deadpool & Wolverine

The film pulls heavily from Fox-era X-Men history, prior Deadpool movies, and multiverse-heavy Marvel storytelling, making many jokes and emotional beats more rewarding with franchise knowledge.

IMDb

Once Upon a Time

Its layered mythology mixes fairy tales, Disney-adjacent expectations, and constantly expanding crossover logic that becomes increasingly dense as more realms and histories overlap.

IMDb

Hannibal

The show can stand alone, but familiarity with earlier Hannibal Lecter films and Thomas Harris stories helps explain character expectations, reversals, and why certain narrative choices feel deliberate.

IMDb

Kingdom Hearts

Understanding Kingdom Hearts often means juggling Disney worlds, Square Enix influences, side games, prequels, and famously tangled lore spread across multiple platforms.

IMDb

Baldur’s Gate 3

You can follow its main story alone, but deeper context comes from Forgotten Realms history, Dungeons & Dragons rules, and older Baldur’s Gate connections.

IMDb

The Batman

Ironically, part of the homework is knowing what it is not. The Batman exists outside the main DC cinematic continuity, so understanding its standalone approach matters more than tracking shared-universe lore.

Movies Everyone Quotes Without Having Actually Seen Them

Movies become instant classics by covering deep themes, being incredibly entertaining, or having quotable lines. That last batch of movies have a tendency of becoming memes, catchphrases and joke enders, to the point that the quote is far more memorable than the film itself.

This has the unfortunate effect of audiences quoting movies they’ve never seen, with the phrases exploding in popularity through other media. There are people that don’t even know the quote is from a movie, since the quote has morphed so much. We hope that this article makes you watch the movies with the immortal quotes.

IMDb

The Godfather

People quote “I’m gonna make him an offer he can’t refuse” constantly, even if they have never sat through the full nearly three-hour mafia classic.

IMDb

The Terminator

“I’ll be back” became such a universal pop-culture shorthand that plenty of people know the line long before ever actually watching the movie it came from.

IMDb

Jaws

“You’re gonna need a bigger boat” escaped the film so completely that many people quote it without ever having seen Spielberg’s shark thriller from beginning to end.

IMDb

Forrest Gump

“Life is like a box of chocolates” became a cultural catchphrase repeated far beyond the movie itself, often by people who know the quote more than the plot.

IMDb

Jerry Maguire

“Show me the money!” became bigger than the movie in everyday conversation, sports talk, and comedy references, even among people who skipped the actual film.

IMDb

A Few Good Men

“You can’t handle the truth!” became one of cinema’s most quoted outbursts, often repeated by people who only know the courtroom moment in isolation.

IMDb

Casablanca

Lines like “Here’s looking at you, kid” remain deeply embedded in pop culture, even though many quoters have never actually watched the wartime romance itself.

IMDb

Gone with the Wind

“Frankly, my dear, I don’t give a damn” is one of the most famous final lines in movie history, often recognized by people who never sat through the epic runtime.

IMDb

The Wizard of Oz

“There’s no place like home” became a cultural shorthand so completely that its movie origins sometimes feel secondary to the quote itself.

IMDb

Star Wars

“May the Force be with you” turned into a universal phrase repeated across generations, including by plenty of people who never actually watched the original film.

IMDb

Dirty Harry

“Do you feel lucky?” remains iconic tough-guy dialogue, even for audiences who know the quote mainly through parodies and impressions instead of the movie.

IMDb

Taxi Driver

“You talkin’ to me?” became one of cinema’s most endlessly referenced moments, often quoted by people who have never seen the unsettling character study around it.

IMDb

Field of Dreams

“If you build it, he will come” became a motivational shorthand in everyday language, far beyond people who have actually watched the baseball fantasy.

IMDb

Apollo 13

“Houston, we have a problem” became such a common shorthand for disaster that many people forget it comes from a specific movie scene.

IMDb

Sudden Impact

“Go ahead, make my day” became a political and pop-culture catchphrase so famous that its original Dirty Harry sequel is often less remembered than the line itself.

14 Actors Who’ve Been in Everything, But You Might Not Recognize

Depending on the decade, the entertainment industry tends to use the same actors across plenty of films, mainly due to their popularity. This is something we’re used to, but the characters behind the big leads also get reused often, something we tend to overlook since, well, they’re in the background.

Still, their performances have merit, since someone needs to play all those roles. Once you see them, though, you can’t unsee them, so be prepared to recognize them everywhere. It’s incredible how prolific these actors are, leaving a legacy of their own by being in so many memorable movies.

IMDb

William Fichtner

Fichtner has spent decades popping up in major films like Heat, Armageddon, Black Hawk Down, and The Dark Knight, often as stern military figures, criminals, or authority characters.

IMDb

Clancy Brown

Even if people know the voice, many forget Brown’s huge live-action résumé, including Highlander, Starship Troopers, The Shawshank Redemption, and countless villain or heavy roles.

IMDb

Zeljko Ivanek

Ivanek became one of Hollywood’s most reliable intense supporting actors, appearing across major films and prestige television while frequently playing lawyers, officials, and morally gray professionals.

IMDb

David Dastmalchian

From The Dark Knight to Blade Runner 2049, Dune, and multiple superhero projects, Dastmalchian repeatedly appears in memorable supporting roles despite remaining less instantly recognizable than many co-stars.

IMDb

M. C. Gainey

Gainey built a long career as intimidating bikers, convicts, and rough-edged authority figures, showing up in Con Air, Sideways, Django Unchained, and many television dramas.

IMDb

Titus Welliver

Before Bosch made him more visible, Welliver had quietly appeared in films like The Town, Gone Baby Gone, Argo, and Transformers: Age of Extinction.

IMDb

J. T. Walsh

Walsh became one of the most dependable character actors of the 1980s and 1990s, often playing corrupt officials, executives, and antagonists in major studio films.

IMDb

Xander Berkeley

Berkeley repeatedly turned up in thrillers, action films, and genre projects, often portraying military officers, investigators, or quietly sinister authority figures.

IMDb

James Rebhorn

Rebhorn quietly became one of Hollywood’s most utilized supporting presences, appearing in everything from Independence Day to Meet the Parents and Scent of a Woman.

IMDb

Miguel Sandoval

Sandoval appeared steadily in crime dramas, thrillers, and action-heavy projects, often playing detectives, commanders, or morally complicated authority figures.

IMDb

Al Leong

Leong became a staple of 1980s and 1990s action movies, frequently appearing as henchmen or silent villains in films like Die Hard, Lethal Weapon, and Bill & Ted’s Excellent Adventure.

IMDb

Tommy Flanagan

Flanagan regularly appeared in gritty supporting roles across action films, crime stories, and historical epics, often recognizable more by his scarred look than his name.

IMDb

Kevin Dunn

Dunn spent decades playing politicians, fathers, executives, and authority figures across major films, becoming one of those actors we recognize instantly but rarely name.

IMDb

Peter Stormare

Stormare built a huge career through eccentric villains, criminals, priests, and oddball supporting characters in films like Fargo, Constantine, and Armageddon

15 Movies We Don’t Believe Anyone Actually Watched All the Way Through

Watching movies is meant to be a joyful experience, even if you’re watching a tense thriller. The point is to have a good time, hence why films are part of the entertainment business. But what happens when a movie isn’t something enjoyable, but something you have to endure?

This is the topic for today: movies that are so hard to get through, people have walked out of cinemas out of sheer frustration. And not because they’re controversial; they’re just plain bad. If you’re planning a movie night, these are the movies to avoid. Or, if you’re brave, these are the movies to endure.

IMDb

Cats

Cats became infamous less for its story than for its uncanny visual effects, erratic tone, and baffling adaptation choices that left viewers treating it more like a curiosity than a full sit-down watch.

IMDb

Movie 43

Its anthology format, wildly uneven sketches, and intentionally gross-out humor gave Movie 43 a reputation as something often talked about more than actually finished.

IMDb

Battlefield Earth

Critics and audiences alike mocked its Dutch angles, awkward performances, and bloated runtime, helping Battlefield Earth become shorthand for movies people abandoned out of frustration.

IMDb

The Last Airbender

The heavily criticized adaptation quickly became known for awkward exposition, stiff performances, and disappointed fans who struggled with how far it drifted from beloved source material.

IMDb

Dragonball Evolution

Long criticized by fans of the original manga and anime, the movie became notorious for flattening major characters and delivering a product that no one liked, even if you knew nothing about the source material.

IMDb

The Emoji Movie

Its corporate premise and critical backlash made The Emoji Movie a common punchline, with many remembering the concept more vividly than the actual full viewing experience.

IMDb

Son of the Mask

As a follow-up to a hugely recognizable comedy, Son of the Mask became infamous for chaotic CGI, strange humor, and poor reception, making it one of those sequels many people know by reputation more than by finishing it.

IMDb

Gigli

Production gossip and brutal reviews often overshadowed the film itself, turning Gigli into one of Hollywood’s most famous flops that many know by reputation alone.

IMDb

Foodfight!

Technical problems, unfinished-looking animation, and years of troubled production made Foodfight! notorious as a bizarre disaster many sampled more than fully consumed.

IMDb

Cats & Dogs: The Revenge of Kitty Galore

Even as a family sequel, it gained little cultural footprint and often gets cited as one of those studio follow-ups most people forgot existed at all.

IMDb

The Love Guru

The Mike Myers comedy drew criticism for repetitive humor and uncomfortable jokes, quickly becoming better known for backlash than for lasting audience affection.

IMDb

Batman & Robin

Its toyetic excess, puns, and exaggerated camp eventually made it a cult curiosity, but for years it represented blockbuster overload at its most exhausting.

IMDb

Norbit

Its heavy prosthetic comedy and divisive humor helped make Norbit one of those hits many people remember existing, while fewer passionately defend revisiting it.

IMDb

After Earth

The sci-fi survival story is a case of stiff pacing and flat emotional impact, leaving it remembered more as a disappointment than a must-finish experience.

IMDb

Transformers: The Last Knight

Even within a huge franchise, The Last Knight became especially criticized for chaotic plotting, mythology overload, and a runtime many viewers found exhausting to sit through.