Michael Giacchino Wrote a Whole Other Score for Fantastic Four

Whether you think The Fantastic Four: First Steps is a true return to form for Marvel or a middling superhero outing, there’s one thing on which we can all agree. The score by Michael Giacchino is incredible, among the best in the esteemed composer’s career.

But to hear him tell it, the aspirational, ‘60s infused theme wasn’t his original plan. “I actually wrote a whole other score for this film that you probably won’t ever hear,” Giacchino revealed at a Deadline panel. Further, the composer intended to use that other score until he actually played the piece alongside First Steps. “I just remember seeing it for the first time with the music and something didn’t feel right.”

It’s a little shocking that anyone would consider a Giacchino score unsuitable, even if it’s Giacchino himself. His career spans three decades, starting with work on video game versions of The Lion King and The Lost World: Jurassic Park onto the J.J. Abrams television shows Alias and Lost, and then to movies such as Star Trek, The Incredibles, and The Batman. He even has stepped into the director’s chair to helm a project, the Marvel special Werewolf by Night.

But clearly, a lot of his success stems from the devotion to a project’s tone and sound that drove him to do away with the first Fantastic Four score. He demonstrated that willingness when he continued to write for the MCU debut of Marvel’s first family even and the film changed forms.

According to Deadline, Giacchino started working on the score when MCU boss Kevin Feige asked him to write for a teaser to be shown at SDCC. He went further to make themes for Galactus and the Silver Surfer, to key elements of the movie. Yet, because Giacchino wrote this score before director Matt Shakman began actually shooting the movie, it ended up not gelling with the actual film.

As frustrating as it may be to have to scrap an entire score, Giacchino wasn’t the only one willing to change his work to meet the demands of the project. Giacchino’s first score helped Shakman solidify his own concept for the movie. “What was really fun was Matt took that to the set,” Giacchino recalled. “It was helpful to them to figure out oh, that’s the movie we’re making. This is the tone. It’s so rare to do that. I think anyone who’s making movies should hire the composer first and then have them write their suite because then they can all get on the same page on day 1.”

For Giacchino, this back and forth is just part of the filmmaking process. “To me, movies are the greatest group art form there is. You get to work with every amazing artist known to man,” he explained. In fact, Giacchino plans to put that principle into practice, going back into the director’s seat, this time on a project for Disney’s competitor. “I’m going to be directing for Warner Bros,” he told the panel. “It’s going to be really fun and I can’t wait to tell you more about all that.”

There’s no word on who will score Giacchino’s WB project, but it must be good to know that he has a whole other score just sitting around that he could use in a pinch.

The Fantastic Four: First Steps is now streaming on Disney+.




Broadchurch Creator Will Bring Agatha Christie Mystery to Netflix

After several years of Netflix making movies that feel an awful lot like Agatha Christie mysteries (Knives Out, its sequel Glass Onion, and the forthcoming Wake Up Dead Man), the streamer has finally decided to just go straight to the source. Agatha Christie’s Seven Dials, a three-part adaptation of novel The Seven Dials Mystery, is slated to premiere in January and will be the service’s first foray into the sort of prestige whodunnit series that BBC, ITV, and BritBox have made a staple of their regular lineups in recent years.

Seven Dials is one of Christie’s lesser-known works, and one that doesn’t feature her more recognizable (and popular) sleuths like Hercule Poirot or Miss Marple. Instead, it’s one of her Superintendent Battle books, and if you don’t recognize that name, it’s because most adaptations of those works tend to edit him out of the story in favor of a younger or more standalone sort of hero. (Womp womp.) Here, Battle not only gets to stick around, he’ll be played by Sherlock fan favorite Martin Freeman, and will form an unlikely investigative duo with the younger Lady Eileen “Bundle” Brent, a fizzy Bright Young Thing with an inquisitive spirit who’ll be played by How to Have Sex’s Mia McKenna-Bruce. 

The series hails from former Doctor Who showrunner Chris Chibnall in his first TV project since leaving the TARDIS behind. But lest we forget, Chibnall is also the creator of Broadchurch, a series that—in its first season at least—is indisputably one of the best crime dramas of all time. So I think we can all agree he has more than proven his chops when it comes to telling densely plotted and wildly twisty mysteries, and seems a natural fit if Netflix is indeed trying to make a new Christieverse take off. 

The story is set in 1920s England, at a lavish house party where a practical joke involving eight alarm clocks—one of which mysteriously disappears—goes horribly wrong. As so often happens in these things, someone turns up dead, and Lady Eileen is determined to suss out whodunnit, but the answers she discovers may well change her life forever. (Battle, it seems will be more of a supporting figure in her search for the truth, and I can’t say that any of us are going to be particularly sad about that.)

As befits a proper British mystery of this type, the series’ cast is impressively starry, featuring The Crown’s Helena Bonham Carter as Eileen’s mother, Lady Caterham; Queen Charlotte’s Corey Mylchreest as Gerry Wade; My Lady Jane’s Edward Bluemel as Jimmy Thesinger, and KAOS’s Nabhaan Rizwan as Ronnie Devereux. 

Could Seven Dials be the start of a new Christie cinematic universe at Netflix? Given that Seven Dials is one of several Superintendent Battle stories—the character was introduced in The Secret of Chimneys, and also appears in both Murder Is Easy and Towards Zero, two stories that the BBC and BritBox recently adapted without him—there’s certainly every chance that’s the case. Keep your fingers crossed, mystery lovers.

Agatha Christie’s Seven Dials will premiere January 15 on Netflix. 

Stranger Things Animated Series Shows the Limits of an ’80s Fixation

Every Den of Geek reader knows that Stranger Things is ending this year with the release of the three-part season 5. But every Den of Geek reader also knows that Stranger Things is incredibly popular, and therefore Netflix cannot let it die. The show has garnered legions of fans because of its ability to distill the feel of Stephen King novels and late night monster movies into its 1980s aesthetic, so it’s no surprise that the streamer would make a spinoff emphasizing the decade.

Netflix has announced Stranger Things: Tales From ’85, an animated series set between seasons 2 and 3 of the main show. The announcement was accompanied by a teaser showing off cartoon versions the Hawkins kids, riding their bikes and setting out for adventure. In between the brief glimpses, the teaser features Stranger Things creators Matt and Ross Duffer and Tales From ’85 showrunner Eric Robles hyping up the show.

All of which is to be expected, but one statement really leaves us scratching our heads. “The idea was to evoke the feeling an ’80s cartoon,” says Matt Duffer, a statement accompanied by storyboards showing the kids peering at a monster around a corner or jumping over a chasm. Certainly, such high adventure concepts would be found in cartoons of the ’80s, whether it be syndicated shows like G.I. Joe and Transformers or movies such as Ralph Bakshi’s Lord of the Rings adaptation.

But the teaser also shows us some clips of the characters in motion. They look incredible: sharp, fluid, dynamic. They also look absolutely nothing like a cartoon from the 1980s.

Certainly, some incredible animation came out during the 1980s, films such as Akira and The Little Mermaid and we all still love DuckTales and The Real Ghostbusters. But the overwhelming majority of the cartoons of the era where cheap and janky-looking—especially those that would have been watched by kids in a small Midwestern town (this writer, a 40-something Michigander, assures you).

And the teaser seems to know that this isn’t an ’80s cartoon. “With the animation there’s really no limits. Eric and his team can just go wild” observes Ross Duffer. Robles concurs, adding, “What we’ve been able to capture is the magic of Hawkins in a new way.”

That phrase “a new way” particularly stands out. The few clips we see do include signifiers of the decade, including Dustin’s blue and orange jacket and a Jaws poster on Mike’s wall. But they are little more than signifiers, and they don’t feel like part of the actual day to day life of someone who lived in the ’80s. The clean digital animation only exacerbates the problem, heightening the difference between a fantasy world and lived experience.

Such problems have always plagued Stranger Things, which uses its ’80s trappings—the mall, the Cold War, various record drops—as tone setting more than realism. The show wants to evoke the feel of reading a yellowed King paperback, not the actual experience of picking up a new copy of Pet Sematary from K-Mart in 1983. There’s nothing inherently wrong with mixing timeframes and signifiers for a particular effect, and clearly it’s worked for Stranger Things.

But when the Duffers start comparing Tales from ’85 to actual ’80s cartoons, the attachment to the era sounds, frankly, desperate. It sounds almost as if they’re clinging to an idea long past its point of viability, sticking to it not because it’s a good idea, but because it’s the thing to do… and that sense of empty desperation probably isn’t something Netflix wants to highlight as it starts milking its prime franchise past its natural end point.

Stranger Things: Tales From ’85 comes to Netflix in 2026.

Fantastic Four: First Steps Learned an Important Lesson from the 1994 Roger Corman Movie

Part of the excitement surrounding the release of The Fantastic Four: First Steps earlier this year was the expectation of seeing Marvel’s First Family done right. Versions of the Fantastic Four appeared on screen before Pedro Pascal, Vanessa Kirby, Joseph Quinn, and Ebon Moss-Bachrach suited up as the quartet, but they never got it quite right. The 2015 movie took a relentlessly dark, body horror approach to the characters. The 2005 and 2007 movies had some comedic moments, but they couldn’t match the grandeur of the original comics by Stan Lee and Jack Kirby. And the 1994 Roger Corman produced Fantastic Four never even got released.

Yet, for the producers of First Steps, it was that lost, low-budget flick that guided their million-dollar Disney movie. “They did a lot of things right in that movie,” said producer Grant Curtis in a new behind-the-scenes featurette released by Marvel. “One of the things I think they did extremely well was the character relationships. It holds up… Those were very real relationships that, when we did our homework and looked at the movie early on, we took note.”

The 1994 Fantastic Four is one of the most unique documents in superhero movie history. When German producer Bernd Eichinger realized his adaptation rights to the characters were set to expire, he enlisted B-movie legend Roger Corman scrounged $1 million budget to throw together a Fantastic Four movie so he could retain his rights. There was no intention to release it.

That plan was not shared with the film’s cast, who put real effort into portraying their characters. However, recalled Reed Richards actor Alex Hyde-White in the new behind-the-scenes video, the ramshackle nature of the production helped the cast discover their characters. “The fact that we were given these roles relatively easily, because [Eichinger and Constantin Films] were under the gun, forced us to trust ourselves or not,” he said. “Part of the reluctant superhero dynamic of the dysfunctional Fantastic Four are embodied in the way the four of us worked together,” he continued, referring to co-stars Rebecca Staab (Sue), Jay Underwood (Johnny), and Michael Bailey Smith (Ben).

That effort resonates even today. Before the release of First Steps, fans regularly ranked the 1994 film as the best of the Fantastic Four movies, precisely because of those interpersonal dynamics. Even when the effects look cheesy, the 1994 film has an energy and earnestness missing from the movies from the 2000s and 2015.

The creators of First Steps clearly agree, including director Matt Shakman. “Matt came into my office one day while we were prepping and said, ‘You know, it would be really great to honor them somehow,'” said Curtis. They did so by giving the cast cameos in the 2025 movie, having Staab and Hyde-White play newscasters reporting on the team, while Underwood and Smith appear as construction workers rescued by the Human Torch.

The latter scene ends with a moment that could feel a bit too cute. Before the Torch flies away, Underwood’s construction worker gives Johnny a salute. But the moment goes beyond just a wink of one Torch acknowledging another—it feels earned, all thanks to the lessons that the MCU actors learned from their 1994 predecessors.

The Fantastic Four: First Steps is now streaming on Disney+.

Doctor Who Spinoff Is Changing the Name of the Classic Sea Devils

In tragic news for those of us who’ve been determinedly calling the forthcoming (questionable) Doctor Who spinoff The War Between the Land and the Sea “that Sea Devils show” or something vaguely similar, we’re going to have to update our terminology. Because in the world of this series, that term is actually kind of offensive. Yes, really. 

Apparently, the classic villains, first introduced in Jon Pertwee’s Third Doctor era, actually prefer to be called “Homo Aqua,” and in the context of this story may not actually be the bad guys at all. Granted, the name shift kind of makes sense—-dumb sense, but sense!—if only as a sort of in-universe reason to explain why this particular flavor of the creatures has slightly more humanoid features than the decidedly scalier versions we last saw in 2022’s “Legend of the Sea Devils”. (Which, if you want to be technical about it, did include a moment where Jodie Whittaker’s Thirteen was criticized for using Homo Aqua’s now former moniker.) 

“It’s racist to say Sea Devil,” screenwriter Russell T Davies (half?) jokingly told the Radio Times during a visit to the series’ set. 

Specific plot details are scarce, but what we do know is that the show will involve a climate change-fueled conflict between humanity and the ancient creatures, who are presumably quite fed up after years of humankind polluting the oceans Homo Aqua call home. Violence seems inevitable, unless human negotiator Barclay (Russell Tovey) and not-a-Sea-Devil ambassador Salt (Gugu Mbatha-Raw) can find a way forward for both their species. 

“I think every writer in the world is thinking, how do you write about the climate crisis?” Davies said. “We’re already in a climate war. This just dramatizes it.” 

Ostensibly, the show is meant to explore how humanity deals with an alien threat when the Doctor’s not around to help, meaning that the not-so-secret government agency UNIT will inevitably play a significant role in everything that goes down. And, according to Davies, The War Between the Land and the Sea will have a very different feel than the flagship series. 

“It’s deliberately tougher. There are things here that would never happen in a Doctor Who story,” Davies says. “It’s in the same universe, but just a different slant. I’m really pleased with it.”

The trailer for the series does have a Torchwood: Children of Earth vibe, including some interesting, not really romantic, but also not that tension between Salt and Barclay, who presumably will have to get past their cross-species tensions to find a way to save the world together. A Whovian take on The Shape of Water, perhaps? 

Whatever it turns out to be, audiences outside of the British Isles will have to wait some time to find out—despite transmitting in the U.K. in December, The War Between the Land and the Sea won’t air elsewhere until some still-to-be-determined point in 2026. At this point, I’m just hoping they let poor Kate Lethbridge-Stewart and her hot second-in-command kiss. 

Sylvester Stallone Considered Backing Off of Rocky IV’s Big Death

It takes only a few minutes for the first big bout in 1985’s Rocky IV to go horribly wrong. What began with pomp and pagentry, as former heavyweight champion Apollo Creed descended from the rafters while James Brown and his band performed “Living in America,” ended in bloodshed. Apollo’s Russian challenger Ivan Drago makes short work of the Count of Monte Fisto, battering him bloody while his best friend Rocky Balboa stands outside the ring, gripping his buddy’s towel. “Throw the towel!” pleads Apollo’s trainer; “Throw the damn towel!”

Rocky doesn’t, choosing instead to honor Apollo’s wishes, even if it costs him his life. But behind the scenes of Rocky IV, Sylvester Stallone almost considered it. “I told Carl, ‘I could have given you a bad back or something, you know what I mean? Put you on crutches for a little while and kept you around,’ Stallone told GoldDerby. “Rocky depends on bouncing off of the other characters, otherwise he has no one to articulate with. I thought killing Apollo was going to make people really angry at the Russian, but it also sabotaged me because I couldn’t replace him.”

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DQsFPA6EyZt/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link

Written and directed by Stallone, Rocky IV finds the Italian Stallone long since retired to a life of luxury, and though he’s loathe to admit his discontent, he knows that fighting is behind him. That’s until Apollo Creed (Carl Weathers) dies fighting Drago (Dolph Lundgren), which drives Rocky to recover his fighting spirit and face the Russian giant, despite the fears of his wife Adrian (Talia Shire).

If that plot description conjures images of complex character stakes, then you must have stopped watching the franchise after the first movie. 1976’s Rocky, written by Stallone and directed by John G. Avildsen is all grit and realism. By 1985, the franchise had embraced the glossy shallowness and conservative politics that Don Simpson and Jerry Bruckheimer brought to blockbusters. Rocky IV mostly plays out in montages and ends with Adrian realizing that she was wrong to ever ask her husband not to do something he wanted to do and Rocky defeating Drago, thereby winning the Cold War. Also, Rocky gives his brother-in-law Paulie (Burt Young) a sexy robot.

It’s a silly, wonderful movie, but to hear Stallone talk about it 40 years later, Rocky IV sounds like a powerful tragedy. “Even though it accomplished the mission [of making audiences hate Drago],” Stallone said of Apollo’s death, “when he left and Mickey left in [Rocky III], you know, Burt Young… really tough.”

The gravity Stallone ascribes to a largely silly movie reflects his recent reappraisal of the film. In 2021, Stallone released a recut version of the film titled Rocky IV: Rocky vs Drago, which toned down the silliness (goodbye, Paulie’s sexy robot) and upped the dramatic stakes, receiving positive reviews. Of course, it also helps that Ryan Coogler and Michael B. Jordan revived the franchise with the excellent spin-off series Creed. And those movies are driven by Apollo’s death, which forces his son Donny (Jordan) to wrestle with the weight of his lost father.

So maybe after all, Apollo did win in a way. And maybe Stallone was right not to throw in the towel and stick Carl Weathers in crutches.

Steven Spielberg and Chris Columbus to Reunite for Gremlins 3

Five years ago, deep within the pandemic, songwriter Nick Lutsko shared on YouTube a song that captured America’s frustrations. “Paralyzed nation, sick and depressed,” he sang. “Gotta keep myself together / Gotta take a deep breath,” he steeled himself before getting to the heart of the matter: “All because there may never be a Gremlins 3.” The rest of “Where did the Gremlins go?” outlines all of the catastrophes the world has experienced since the Gremlins franchise died off, from 9/11 to the continuation of the Land Before Time series.

Well, Lutsko’s plea must have worked. According to The Hollywood Reporter, Warner Bros. has given Gremlins 3 a release date of November 19, 2027. Even better, Steven Spielberg is back to produce and original screenwriter Chris Columbus will once again write and direct the film.

Every ’80s kid knows that Gremlins introduced the world to Mogwai, cute cuddly creatures who could be your best friend, as long as you abided by three specific rules: keep them away from light, don’t get them wet, and don’t feed them after midnight. When Billy Peltzer (Zach Galligan) violated the second rule in the original 1984 film, letting water accidentally spill on his Mogwai Gizmo, he found himself caring for a host of bad tempered variations of his furry pal. And when those offshoots scarfed fried chicken after midnight, they transformed into the movie’s titular green beasties, wreaking all sorts of havoc in idyllic Kingston Falls.

Specifically, the Gremlins wreaked a very Looney Tunes style of havoc, a tonal choice foreshadowed by a cameo appearance by Warner Bros. animation legend Chuck Jones early in the film. Moreover, that sense of wackiness came from the movie’s director Joe Dante, who transformed Columbus’ more mean-spirited original script into something goofy. Dante famously pushed that aesthetic even further for the 1990 sequel Gremlins 2: The New Batch, in which Billy brings the Gremlins into the Trump Tower-like Clamp building for all sorts of hijinks.

So important is Dante’s contribution to what made Gremlins special that his absence from the latest sequel announcement does raise some eyebrows. Will the third outing have the same commitment to wacky nonsense that made the previous movies so enjoyable? Columbus has shown his ability to do slapstick, most obviously in the first two Home Alone movies, so maybe he’ll retain some of that energy.

However, we can probably assume that he won’t bring the same nastiness that drove his original script. A lot of middle-of-the-road family fare marks Columbus’s filmography, including the first two Harry Potter movies, Mrs. Doubtfire, and, Percy Jackson & the Olympians: The Lightning Thief. His latest outing, The Thursday Murder Club for Netflix, may be about a killer, but there’s no sense of edge to it.

If Columbus takes a softer tone with Gremlins 3, then he’ll be following the franchise’s recent turn. HBO has aired two seasons of a kid-focused Gremlins animated series on HBO Max, dealing with Gizmo’s time in Chinatown before the events of the first movie.

The Gremlins animated series was well received overall, but it’s clearly not been enough to assuage fans like Lutsko. Will Spielberg and Columbus allow him to finally end his lament? We’ll find out in two years.

Gremlins 3 is set to release on November 19, 2027.

Jennifer Lawrence, Rose Byrne and the Rise of Mom Trauma Cinema

On a front porch in a decrepit Appalachian home, a new father and his infant son idle away the afternoon. The proud papa, Jackson (Robert Pattinson), beams while his child giggles at the sky. Neither seems particularly observant of Jackson’s wife, and the baby’s mother, is approaching on all fours—and in tall grass that Jackson never thinks to mow. 

This is Grace (Jennifer Lawrence), the protagonist of Lynne Ramsay’s Die, My Love. She’s also a new mother who looks at her offspring in much the same way that a jungle cat considers a gazelle before going into a crouch. The visual metaphor is not subtle, yet little is intended to be in Ramsay’s stark meditation on the epic trials, tribulations, and even traumas of motherhood.

Marketed around the obvious sexiness of Pattinson and Lawrence portraying newlyweds, Die, My Love certainly basks in that steam early on with several montages of Jackson and Grace playing house, often sans clothes. But from the first expansive wide shot of that house being discovered by a wary. expectant mother—who is practically drowning in a frame filled by debris and fallen leaves cramping what is maybe supposed to be the living room—there is a deliberate lack of bliss in this place. (We later learn that Jackson inherited the structure from his extended local family after his uncle killed himself.) It’s apparently here that Jackson has convinced Grace to move and start their family, and where he will leave her while pursuing his part-time job as a truck driver. She meanwhile must raise their child, keep the house clean, and even feed and train a dog that Jackson one day brings home—all while supposedly finding time to write. Mind, we see nary a laptop, typewriter, or even a book enter the household.

Adapted by Ramsay and playwrights Enda Walsh and Alice Birch from a novel by Ariana Harwicz, Die, My Love is one of several new films in a rising tide of cinema about the existential dread of motherhood, be it due to postpartum depression or otherwise. It’s never exactly clear if that is what gnaws at Grace, or if it is an altogether different mental illness that Jackson nor his hovering extended family notice until they’ve boxed her into the role of happy homemaker. It is just conveyed, heavily, that she is a troubled stranger in a strange land. Ramsay likewise favors a structure that is nonlinear and detached, taking on an increasingly allegorical surreality as Grace’s memories of her wedding, pregnancy, and motherhood blend and blur. Eventually she sees her son present during an extended flashback of her wedding night.

The approach gives Lawrence a mountain of material to work with, and she makes it ring true when Grace says that the only thing in her life she comes to love, in spite of the title, is her son. “He’s perfect.” And yet throughout the movie, one gets the strong sense she never had much of a vote in when or where he would be born, and with what support system. Jackson’s childhood friends and family ostensibly become Grace’s, but she goes from missing the initial carnality of their relationship—even snarking “you don’t bore me,” when he complains about her not stargazing with him, “it’s fucking everything else”—to outright resenting a man who claims he is always tired, even as he keeps a handful of condoms in his glove compartment.

As the director of You Were Never Really Here and We Need to Talk About Kevin, Ramsay is a veteran of the slow-burn and introspective character studies. And there is a lot of character for both Lawrence and Pattinson to play. Strangely though, they remain as distant as the starlight seems to Grace on that glassy night with a telescope. Everything is remote and broken. That is of course how the pair let their marriage deteriorate, and perhaps how Grace feels about everyone in her life save the child she comes to idolize, but for a film attempting to insert us into the interiority of a mother’s struggles, we nor her film ever fully internalize Grace’s point-of-view or the anxieties that ail her. Despite the movie being told through her eyes, what lies behind them remains an abstraction. Die makes the pretense of trying to help, yet a lot like the characters onscreen fails to connect with the crisis at hand.

Fortunately, Die, My Love is not the only film eager to meet the regressive cultural moment where “trad wife” hashtags and sensibilities attempt to squeeze women back into kitchens. In the last 18 months, we’ve had Amy Adams and Marielle Heller’s Nightbitch, which is a lot more conventional than that title might suggest, not to mention a pair of nun-sploitation horror movies about forced pregnancy. Of the two, it is the piece of IP extension, The First Omen, which turned out to be radically impassioned statement thanks to thrilling direction by Arkasha Stevenson and a bold performance from Nell Tiger Free.  

Almost all of these pictures are from women directors intent on dragging the cinematic language around motherhood away from iconography associated with domestic simplicity or a sense of generational conformity. The best one, however, might be another flirtation with surreality and allegory that just entered wide release last week: Mary Bronstein’s If I Had Legs I’d Kick You.

The A24 release stars Rose Byrne as Linda, a mother who supposedly has her life together as a successful therapist and in a loving home with her daughter (Delaney Quinn) and husband Charles (Christian Slater). Except that Charles is almost entirely off-screen, a warm if distracted voice on an iPhone as he attempts to humor his wife while working as a captain on a cruise ship. Meanwhile the aforementioned daughter is technically onscreen, but her face is never seen, nor her name uttered.

Instead this child with an undisclosed medical condition is simply a source of wants, pleads, and cries; a babe who can articulate she desires a hamster right now, or that she is hungry, but otherwise seems to offer nothing but burden and guilt to a mother who also must deal with the fact that they have to abscond to a sketchy motel after their house floods due to a burst pipe.

If I Had Legs I’d Kick You is another film about the traumatic stresses of motherhood, albeit at a later stage that’s far removed from what could be attributed to postpartum depression or mental disorder. In fact, as a therapist, Linda should be able to pick at what bothers her—or at least her own shrink (an intentionally unfunny and dour-faced Conan O’Brien) should. Alas, she is so distracted by the myriad horrors conspiring against her—including the paranoid-but-not-wrong suspicion her own psychiatrist might hate her guts—that she nor her film have a moment to breathe. Instead If I Had Legs flirts with horror and suspense genre conventions while immersing you so deeply into Linda’s perspective that even the source of both her panic and theoretical joy remains a faceless abstraction. But we know who and what it is, intimately.

Bronstein, who is married to screenwriter Ronald Bronstein, seems to share her husband’s affinity for turning the knife in the viewer and keeping things at an exasperated broil (Ronald co-wrote Uncut Gems). Mary also benefits greatly from the pitch-perfect casting of Byrne as Linda.

A dramatic and funny actor, Byrne is often celebrated for her versatility. Consider that she starred in generational classic Bridesmaids, Insidious, and an X-Men flick all in the same year. Linda is nonetheless the character this actor has been waiting for; a showcase of all her talents in one tour de force characterization. Linda is a deeply acerbic, burned out mess who in another era or film could have led a raunchy laugher (or at least a highbrow dinner table comedy), but here slouches one bottle at a time into an existential despair that is literalized by the gaping, moldering hole in her house.

It’s a tremendous performance and one, like the film, which invites the audience into a mother’s crucible. Among the many films dealing with the perils of maternity that well-meaning (or oafish) husbands miss, Byrne, Bronstein, and Linda force everyone to stop and gawk at what viscerally feels like a five-car pile up. It might also be a five-star triumph.

Die, My Love is in limited release right now, If I Had Legs I’d Kick You is currently in wide release.

Frankenstein Review: Guillermo del Toro Reconstructs a Classic Monster in His Own Image

No Frankenstein adaptation happens in a vacuum. It’s not just Mary Shelley’s 1818 novel which precdes any new telling of the story Victor Frankenstein and his monster. Filmmakers must also contend with the 1931 James Whale movie and its superior 1935 sequel. Even the Mel Brooks spoof Young Frankenstein looms larger over any update.

So it is to his credit that Guillermo del Toro doesn’t try to be a modern Prometheus and do a wholly original take. Instead of pushing Baron Victor Frankenstein and his Creature (as he’s credited in the film—not Monster) away from Colin Clive and Boris Karloff, del Toro urges his actors to be even more emotional, more menacing, and somehow more humane. Through its lushness and empathy, combined with romantic visuals, del Toro sends a bolt of lighting through the familiar story, making it altogether his.

At first glance, del Toro’s Frankenstein hews closely to the source material. It opens with icebound Scandinavian sailors discovering a contrite Baron Victor Frankenstein (Oscar Isaac), who shares with the captain (Lars Mikkelsen) his tale. Victor tells of his imperious father’s (Charles Dance) tutelage, his beloved mother’s (Mia Goth in a shroud) untimely death, and the arrival of his bright-eyed brother William (Felix Kammerer). A brilliant surgeon who wants to succeed where his father failed, Victor endeavors to conquer death, a feat helped along with unlimited financial support by an arms dealer called Henrich Harlander. During the process, our not-so-good doctor also falls for Harlander’s niece Elizabeth (also Goth), who happens to be William’s fiancée. Eventually Victor thinks he’s succeeded when he gives life to a nameless Creature (Jacob Elordi), but soon enough he learns that his inability to teach his creation is just the beginning of his troubles.

It should be noted that at this point, just over halfway through the movie, the Creature takes over as narrator, explaining how he developed speech and befriended a kindly blind man (David Bradley, actually playing a nice elderly person in del Toro movies, at least). Yes, this Creature is verbose, something absent in most post-Universal Frankenstein adaptations, but present in the Shelley novel. Also, unsurprisingly given the director’s love of monsters, the Creature’s section is where del Toro truly distinguishes his take. The filmmaker and his team of makeup and special effects artists give the Creature a beautiful design, adorning Elordi’s sizable frame with seams that recall speed lines. Most Frankenstein adaptations make the Creature an innocent, but rarely has the character been portrayed with the tenderness that Elordi brings. The way he nuzzles his face into to any person kind enough to come near him communicates his longing for human connection better than any of the many speeches he delivers.

Those who would connect with the Creature include this movie’s Elizabeth, perhaps the most distinctly original version of the character to date. Elizabeth enters the story via her relations with other men and earns her first scene when she catches Victor’s attention. Yet she proves that she’s so much more than an extension of anyone else, whether she’s rejecting the ideals of either Frankenstein brother or studying the Creature. Goth finds a new application for the uncanny screen presence she brought to Pearl or Infinity Pool, establishing through facial expressions and posture that Elizebeth does not belong in polite society.

Wonderful as Elordi and Goth are, Isaac’s take on the mad doctor is more difficult, and rightfully so. Despite being roundly criticized for his English accent in the Marvel series Moon Knight, Isaac goes posh for Frankenstein, his clipped delivery highlighting the mannered performance. Yet he makes Victor so manic, so driven only by his passions that the accent no longer feels like the bad reproduction of real speech and more like an idiosyncratic language spoken by this one genius. Isaac takes control of the screen during an early scene—in which an inquisition into Victor’s method becomes a platform for him to challenge God—and he never lets go.

The passion that Isaac, Goth, and Elordi give their characters doesn’t quite overcome the movie’s overall messiness, however. Del Toro earns most of his film’s 150-minute running time, and yet the final 20 minutes still feel rushed. It’s not just that the final confrontation between the Creature and his creator lacks urgency; its that del Toro suddenly scrambles to say something about the nature of war and forgiveness and regret, suddenly shoving themes into the film that seemed unimportant earlier. For such a thundering, emotional film, Frankenstein ends with a disappointing whimper.

One gets the sense that the movie’s themes dissipate because del Toro doesn’t really care about them. However, no one can charge him with being lax with his visuals. Like all of del Toro’s movies, Frankenstein looks incredible, taking full advantage of the Gothic setting to create cavernous sets and to clothe Goth in luscious dresses. Cinematographer Dan Laustsen and Tamara Deverell give the film a world as overheated as its characters, most notably with the converted water station that becomes Victor’s laboratory, complete with a yawning hole in the center.

This Frankenstein looks like no other version of Shelley’s story, and it feels like no other version. It’s not necessarily the best movie about a man who challenged the Almighty and paid the price for meddling in God’s domain. But it is the only version that could come from Guillermo del Toro’s wonderful genius.

Frankenstein streams on Netflix on Nov. 7, 2025.

Ghostbusters Gave Us Cinema’s Best New York City Mayor

As the son of filmmaker Mira Nair, New York’s newest mayor Zohran Mamdani knows the difference between Hollywood and reality. He knows that he’ll have a hard time living up to the expectations that have built up in the minds of New Yorkers after seeing their city’s politics depicted again and again. But does he know that the most daunting example is the one set by a guy named Lenny?

Mayor Lenny is the only name we have for the politician David Margulies plays in Ghostbusters and its first sequel, Ghostbusters II. Mayor Lenny has only a couple of scenes, and he’s never the guy we see dealing with Gozer or Vigo the Carpathian. Yet, in those few scenes, Mayor Lenny establishes himself as the greatest New York Mayor in movie history, and a fine example for any of his real-world counterparts.

What does Lenny do so well? First of all, he gets the right people for the job. As many have noted, Ghostbusters is a fantasy of free market capitalism, in which small business owners strike out on their own from the world of academia with an in-demand product and successfully market themselves, despite interference by government regulators. Even before they toast Gozer and the Terror Dogs, the Ghostbusters have become economic heroes when they successfully get the mayor to hire them.

For his part, Lenny looks good in this scene precisely because he’s the one doing the hiring. Instead of listening to the apparently anatomically impaired Walter Peck (William Atherton), with his regulations and bylaws, Lenny goes straight to the experts, the professionals can get the job done. He uses the taxpayers’ money wisely and efficiently.

But doesn’t he do so out of self-interest? Doesn’t he only hire the team after Venkman tells him that, if the Ghostbusters pull off the task, he will have saved the lives of millions of registered voters? Yes, as he should! As the mayor, those registered voters are his constituency. It may sound craven coming out of Venkman’s mouth (what doesn’t?), but his job is to look out for those registered voters, protecting their interests and their safety. He’s not acting out of his own self-interest. He’s acting as the mayor of one of the most important cities in the world.

In fact, Lenny is defined by his ability to pay attention to others. While he has little use for Peck’s conclusions, he does hear the man out. Moreover, he also listens to representatives from the fire department, the police, and other civil services. He even gets a visit from a high-ranking member of the Catholic church, to take spiritual guidance along with his logistical concerns.

In Ghostbusters II, the team has fallen on hard times as the city has forgotten what the Ghostbusters did for them. But Lenny hasn’t forgotten. So when pink slime starts manifesting around NYC, he calls the Ghostbusters once again.

And, once again, Lenny has others in the conference, someone providing a counterpoint to the Ghostbusters’ argument. He listens everyone in the room, and even though he initially rejects the team, he does so on the grounds of protecting his constiuency. “Being miserable and treating other people like dirt is every New Yorker’s God-given right,” he declares, valiantly defending his peoples’ freedoms.

In short, Lenny values expertise. He gets perspectives from all of the relevant sources and takes his time making a decision, constantly wondering what will best for the people he represents. Lenny values the interests of New Yorkers. Lenny values the rule of law.

Obviously, it’s too early to know if Mayor Mamdani will also put prioritize, citizens’ rights, and the rule of law. We certainly hope he will, but the real world has given us too many examples to just take it on faith. But if he can do just a fraction of what Mayor Lenny did, then millions of registered voters can rest easy, knowing they can still be miserable and treat other people like dirt.

Requiem for the Kelvinverse: 5 Things the J.J. Abrams Star Trek Movies Did Right

The Kelvinverse has come to an end. The universe that J.J. Abrams inaugurated with his 2009 reboot film Star Trek has now been officially shelved, as Paramount seeks a new direction. Now, it is time to remember the fallen franchise. And of the Kelvinverse, we can only say this: of all the movies I have encountered in my travels, these were the most… human.

Okay, maybe that refiguring of a classic line from Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan doesn’t completely work when applied to Star Trek, Star Trek Into Darkness, and Star Trek Beyond. But it is an example of what the trilogy often did, taking familiar lines and characters and giving them new context. Sometimes, the results were disastrous, as when John Harrison revealed himself as Khan, a name that meant nothing to Kirk and Spock. Sometimes, though, it was magic, as when Leonard Nimoy‘s Spock introduced himself to Chris Pine’s Kirk by saying, “l have been, and always shall be, your friend.”

Yes, the Kelvinverse was a mixed experiment overall. But as it makes its way to Sto-vo-kor, let’s shout the franchise’s praises to let them know a warrior is coming.

1. Trekking Is an Adventure

The biggest criticism of the J.J. Abrams movies—and, to a lesser extent, the Justin Lin-directed Star Trek Beyond—is that they’re really Star Wars movies retrofit for Federation service. Abrams and his screenwriters Roberto Orci and Alex Kurtzman stripped away all the philosophical debate that marked the original series and movies and replaced them with scenes of Kirk and co running up and down the hallways of the Enterprise.

That’s a totally fair and correct assessment. But here’s the counter-point: Star Trek 2009 is a lot of fun. And, believe it or not, Star Trek can be fun. Yes, we can all point to Gene Roddenberry-approved examples of Star Trek being boring (coughthemotionpicturecough). But we can point to just as many examples of Kirk, Spock, and McCoy going on adventures, punching out a bad guy or smirking in the face of danger.

Abrams may have gone too far in some cases, but there’s nothing wrong with reminding everyone that this is a series about space explorers. It’s okay if Kirk has a twinkle in his eye.

2. It’s About the Characters

The other big complaint about the Kelvin movies was that they totally misunderstood Kirk and Spock. Again, this assessment has value. Chris Pine‘s Kirk had a different childhood than that of the one played by William Shatner, and clearly didn’t spend his days at Starfleet Academy with his nose in a book. Worse for some, this Kirk chases women in a manner more in line with Zapp Brannigan from Futurama than with anything Shatner did. For his part, Zachary Quinto plays Spock as the boiling pit of rage that Nimoy’s Spock always swore was there, and his romantic exploits foreshadow the third season of Strange New Worlds.

And yet, all of the Kelvin movies have wonderful moments with the characters. There’s Karl Urban as Bones McCoy grouching about the endless emptiness of space. There’s Zoe Saldaña‘s Uhura talking down the Klingons in one of the few bright spots of the dire Into Darkness. There’s the loving homages to James Doohan and Walter Koenig from Simon Pegg and Anton Yelchin.

The Kelvin movies understood what the TOS films and especially Next Generation learned. That traveling through space is a lot more fun when it happens with friends.

3. The Aliens Look Alien

Look, we love Star Trek‘s aliens. But even the most unapologetic Trekkie has to admit that its a bit disappointing that the galaxy is filled with humanoids who have different stuff stuck to their ears and foreheads, even after watching “The Chase.” Famously, the spartan alien designs were a consequence of the show’s limited budget. But man, it sure was nice that Paramount gave Abrams a budget to fill the cosmos with genuine weirdos.

Suddenly, the Enterprise was filled with creatures of unusual shapes and sizes, whether it’s Scotty’s pal Keenser (Deep Roy) or the visually striking Jaylah (Sofia Boutella) from Beyond. Not only did these additions make the movies more visually striking, but they also underscored the primary hope of the franchise’s utopian future: that beings from all different worlds can come together and work for the good of all. The Kelvin movies achieved that dream without making it an explicit part of their stories, simply taking as a given that the universe is diverse.

4. Preserve the Prime Timeline

One could legitimately argue that the very best moment in Star Trek history occurs in the 2009 film. Specifically, it occurs right at the start, when George Kirk sacrifices himself to save his crew. That short epilogue, starring a pre-Thor Chris Hemsworth as Jim Kirk’s father, has enough awe and emotion to stand alongside anything in “The Inner Light,” “City on the Edge of Forever,” or “It’s Only a Paper Moon.”

But the even better part is that the arrival of Nero and the destruction of the Kelvin gave Abrams a whole new quadrant to play in. Unlike other reboots, such as DC Comics Crisis on Infinite Earths, the Kelvin split left in tact everything that came before, and just created its own branching timeline. Thus, we could get Kirk blasting “Sabotage” without ever compromising anything we see in TOS, TNG, or any other series. Sure, they blew up Vulcan to make it happen, and there is something tragic about having our Spock die so far from the Enterprise he loved and the planet he fought to unify, but given the way other reboots tend to wipe everything out, it’s a pretty good compromise.

5. Go Beyond

The worst of the three Kelvin films was easily Into Darkness, perhaps the worst Trek movie ever made. And its major problems were those common to Abrams as a writer, including his tendency to appease fans instead of advancing the story (see also: “Rey who?” in The Rise of Skywalker). But outside of that entry, the Kelvin movies did an admirable job finding new corners of the Star Trek world to play in.

The 2009 movie gave us Nero, a working-class Romulan with none of the deviousness that we so often associate with the race. Beyond did even better, introducing Jaylah, a member of a totally new species, which gave a fun twist to the Heart of Darkness plot that drove the primary villain, Krall.

These might seem simple advances, but compared to nu-Trek‘s endless need to repeat the past, the movies serve as important reminder. Trek must, fundamentally, boldly go forward and seek out new lives and new civilizations. The Kelvin movies may have done seeking imperfectly, but the did do it. And now its the job of today’s Trek to do the same, even as we move on from Kelvinverse.

Deadpool Star Pitches a ’90s Extreme X-Men Movie

We live in strange times, pop culturally speaking. Deep cut comic book characters who, just twenty years ago, would be discussed only in hushed tones in lunchroom corners are now household names played by A-listers. Suddenly, everyone knows who Bucky Barnes and the Peacemaker are. So it’s not the craziest thing in the world that someone would pitch a movie about ’90s Extreme X-Men character Shatterstar, nor that the proposed movie would take place in the gonzo Mojoverse.

In a recent interview with ComicBook, Shatterstar actor Lewis Tan pitched the idea of giving his character a solo adventure through the Mojoverse. “I have had cameos in both Deadpool [2] and Deadpool & Wolverine, but they never really fleshed out that character much,” he pointed out. “It would be nice to see Mojoworld. It’s so timely now with AI and obsessions with screens and social media. That is Mojoworld. That planet is basically this giant Mad Max Universe, where they are obsessed with seeing people die on television. They have these gladiator matches as entertainment. It’s a very timely subject that could be a cool world.”

As any ’90s comic fan knows, Tan’s idea makes a lot of sense for the character. Shatterstar debuted in 1991’s New Mutants #99, the issue before artist Rob Liefeld, working with writer Fabian Nicieza, officially turned what began as a team of younger students at Xavier’s Institute for Gifted Children into the paramilitary group X-Force. With his impractical double-bladed sword, ostentatious headgear, and general bad attitude, Shatterstar embodied Liefeld’s approach to superheroes, all sharp edges, excessive thin lines, and no feet. And of course, he was a hit.

Over time, we learn that Shatterstar comes from the Mojoverse, a world obsessed with entertainment and controlled by Mojo, one of a sluglike race of “spineless ones” that also act like studio executives. The spineless ones create warriors such as Shatterstar—and more famously, the X-Man Longshot—to be gladiators in some of Mojo’s most popular shows. Even though later writers developed Shatterstar’s personality from the glowering killer he was, giving him a wholesome relationship with fellow X-Force member Rictor, he remains little more than a single-minded killer.

As demonstrated by his parts in Shadow and Bone and the Mortal Kombat movies, Tan certainly can pull off both the physical and dramatic demands of the character, suggesting unexplored depth while still looking cool during fight scenes. And while Shatterstar was once roundly mocked in superhero fan circles for being a prime example of ’90s edgy excess, Deadpool‘s success proves that there’s an audience for those absurdities.

In fact, Tan points to another once-belittled, now-beloved character from 1990s X-Men comics as evidence that a Shatterstar movie could work. “Realistically, the best way to approach it would be similar to how they are approaching Channing Tatum’s character as Gambit,” he pointed out. “You did a cameo, people liked it and they are going to do a more fleshed out version of him in a more serious way. I read in an interview he was saying it was going to be less comedic now. I feel we could do the same type of thing with Shatterstar.”

Twenty years ago, such an idea would be ludicrous. Now, it makes total sense.

Ken Jennings Bows to the Chronically Online After AI Jeopardy Clue

The chronically online got a belated apology from Jeopardy! host Ken Jennings this week after an October 24 episode of the series inadvertently sowed (there are a few more pig puns coming, so strap in) seeds of dismay with a clue about the viral meme character John Pork.

Pork, who has the head of a pig but the body of a human, has been popping up on Instagram and TikTok since at least 2018, but in the category of “Daddy, Is There Really A…” during the aforementioned episode, one clue described Pork as “AI-generated”, which had some viewers squealing hogwash.

Indeed, Pork was bacon a splash online before the relatively recent surge of generative‑AI content, and although he’s currently regarded as deceased for reasons that we promise are not worth getting into right now, he’ll probably still be lurking in some corner of the internet when AI has been replaced by our one true robot overlord: an air fryer that also folds laundry and does jury duty.

Jennings admitted he didn’t understand the John Pork clue at the time, and let’s face it, he probably wasn’t alone. You have to be at least a little too online to recognize the meme, let alone take umbrage at the besmirching of its good name.

Following pushback online, Jennings offered a mea culpa of sorts in a video posted to social media: “When we played a clue recently on Jeopardy! on John Pork, I remarked that I didn’t understand a word of it,” he said. “Well, I’ve had a chance to learn quite a bit about the late Mr. Pork, including the fact that some viewers took exception with our description of him as ‘AI-generated.'”

Jennings added, “Now, even though AI is used heavily in many of his TikToks, it’s possible that wasn’t the best wording to refer to his original appearances. John, I hope you’ll forgive me and all of us at Jeopardy! for any insult we may have committed against you or your memory.”

Jeopardy! remains the gold standard of quiz‑show entertainment, despite this ham-fisted slip-up. Hopefully, Pork fans are satis-sty-d with this apology and can move on.

A Long-Delayed Stan Lee Movie is Finally Being Made

Movie-goers don’t need to look far to see signs of Stan Lee‘s influence on the big screen. Characters that Smilin’ Stan co-created with Jack Kirby, Steve Ditko, and others continue to fill movie theaters, guys like Spider-Man and the Avengers. But anyone who knows anything about Lee also knows that he longed to move out of doing superheroes and into other forms of media, including film. To help him make the move, he sought out the help of collaborators, including Troma Entertainment founder Lloyd Kaufman.

One of those aborted projects is finally coming to life, more than 50 years since Lee worked on it. Bloody Disgusting is reporting that pre-production has begun on Night of the Witch, based on the screenplay that Lee and Kaufman wrote back in 1971. Joe Manco will direct, working from a script that he and Kaufman based on the earlier draft by Lee and Kaufman.

The story of a Mexican-American girl who gets caught in a witch trial, Night of the Witch is “a very powerful story,” Manco told Bloody Disgusting. “Once you see what Lloyd is trying to say in his scripts, you figure out the meaning behind it all; the message. That’s what I’m most concerned with. Night of the Witch is just as relevant today as it was in 1970 — maybe even more so —and our mission is to make it hit harder, to make it more brutal, and to remind people these same battles have been fought for decades.”

For Kaufman, the movie’s production is an opportunity to do what he does best, get people to make their own damn movie. “I know talent when I see it — my record proves it — and Joe is the right filmmaker to finally bring this story to life,” he said. It’s hard to disagree with his claim, given the success of his protogee James Gunn. But Kaufman sees another, more recent connection. “Just as I handed Toxie’s mop to Macon Blair at Comic-Con, I’m handing Night of the Witch to Joe Manco,” he continued, referencing the well-received Toxic Avenger remake. “He’s ready, more than ready, to carry that torch and finally make this film.”

And what of Stan Lee? While some might see more than a little poetic justice in someone totally ignoring Lee’s contributions and taking all the credit for themselves, that’s not what Kaufman’s doing. In the short documentary video “Passing the Torch,” about the production of Night of the Witch, Kaufman not only acknowledges Lee’s contributions, but credits his advocacy for helping The Toxic Avenger get made back in 1984.



Robert Englund Calls on Freddy vs. Jason Director to Make Horror Comeback

Bride of Chucky director Ronny Yu hasn’t helmed a full feature film since Saving General Yang back in 2013, but A Nightmare on Elm Street star Robert Englund would love to see him make a horror comeback.

Englund, who reprised the role of iconic boogeyman Freddy Krueger in Yu’s 2003 horror crossover hit Freddy vs. Jason, thinks it’s about time the beloved director returned to bless the genre with his gifts.

“I’d really love to see something new from Ronny Yu,” Englund told Dread Central. “Not only did he make Freddy vs. Jason work, but I remember being at a film festival in France years ago, sitting with John Landis at nine in the morning, sipping those big bowl cups of French coffee, watching Bride of Chucky. Ronny has such a gift for that edgy, graphic-novel-style horror.”

75-year-old Yu is often thought to have retired from filmmaking, a misconception he’s quashed before. In 2022, he said he’d be interested in returning to work on another Chucky project, and a year later in an interview with That Phat Samurai, Yu revealed he was working on a new sci-fi movie and confirmed he’d “never retire,” adding, “I’m lazy.”

“Lazy” certainly isn’t the first word that comes to mind when looking at Yu’s long career. Born in Hong Kong in 1950, Yu battled childhood polio, which he said was a key influence on his imagination and why he eventually turned to cinema, although it was a while before he got there. He initially pursued business studies in the U.S. before he moved into filmmaking in Hong Kong during the late 1970s.

Over the next decade or so, Yu went on to establish himself in the Hong Kong film scene, directing films like The Servant and The Occupant, but in 1993, he grabbed international recognition with films like The Bride with White Hair and made the move to bigger Hollywood budgets with his Chucky and Friday the 13th franchise installments.

Yu may have dabbled in horror, but his work has covered many genres, including martial arts. 2006 Jet Li vehicle Fearless was the highest-grossing Hong Kong film of that year, and having already worked with Samuel L. Jackson on The 51st State, he was set to team up with him again for Snakes on a Plane. Yu was replaced before filming began and has spoken about how different the movie would have been, claiming that he even planned to kill off Jackson’s character in a Jaws-esque shock. Perhaps he never saw Deep Blue Sea.

While Yu may or may not return to the horror genre in the future, we’re with Englund here – we’d love to see it.

Predator: Badlands Director Seeks “Holy Grail” of Arnold Schwarzenegger Franchise Return

Arnold Schwarzenegger could make a return to the Predator franchise in the future and reprise his role as Dutch, according to Predator: Badlands producer Ben Rosenblatt.

Rosenblatt has confirmed that director Dan Trachtenberg, who helms the latest franchise installment, has met up with Arnie about appearing in a possible sequel. Dutch briefly popped up in the animated series Predator: Killer of Killers recently, but Arnie hasn’t made a live-action comeback since he starred in the original 1987 movie. However, the team behind Predator: Badlands are still keen to make it happen.

“Obviously, the holy grail of Predator movies would be getting Arnold back in there,” Rosenblatt said this week (via Deadline). “And it’s always been something in the back of our minds that it would be really great to see him come back to this franchise that he’s made iconic, and that’s made him iconic.”

Rosenblatt added, “He’s been really wonderful. Arnold and Dan have met a couple of times now. He’s been really interested in what we’re doing, he’s a real fan of what we’ve done so far, from what I understand. And we’re really excited. After Predator: Badlands comes out, we’ll see and have more conversations. Hopefully, we’ll have a chance to do something with Arnold, because that would be awesome.”

Predator: Badlands flips the script on other franchise outings. Instead of humans hunting Predators, the film follows a young Predator outcast named Dek (Dimitrius Schuster‑Koloamatangi) who teams up with Thia (Elle Fanning). It also includes a different kind of Alien crossover element, as Thia is a synth created by the Weyland-Yutani corporation.

Director Dan Trachtenberg has explained that while the movie is a crossover with Alien in some respects, thanks to the corporate tie-ins, it isn’t a full-blown Predator vs. Alien mash-up, as he didn’t want to lean into the tendency to be “grabbing all the action figures and smashing them together” like other crossover movies do.

Predator: Badlands is set for release on November 7, with no Arnie… this time.

Only Robert Pattinson Could Confirm He’s In Dune 3 This Casually

Robert Pattinson, a man who, when once asked what his life was like outside of acting, simply responded with “sucks,” has finally confirmed that he’s in Dune: Part Three.

The actor broke the news in a typically casual way during an interview about his new film, Die My Love, in which he co-stars alongside Jennifer Lawrence. The press tour for the movie has so far seen Pattinson admit to eating out of Lawrence’s trash and freaking out about dancing in front of the camera, which apparently made him sweat so much he soaked his trousers.

In a conversation with IndieWire, Pattinson also discussed having memory issues in the past, and it was just about then that he (perhaps accidentally) broke the news of his Dune 3 casting, saying that the desert heat on the film’s set temporarily altered his usual mental state.

“When I was doing Dune, it was so hot in the desert that I just couldn’t question anything”, he said. “And it was so relaxing, like my brain actually wasn’t operating; I did not have a single functioning brain cell. And I was just listening to Denis [Villeneuve]: ‘Whatever you want!’”

Pattinson has readily admitted that he makes things up in interviews and that it’s come back to bite him. One particular interview with The Today Show saw Pattinson claim that he’d only been to the circus once because he saw a clown die there. Every Pattinson press tour is a gift because he really could just say anything, and it might be years before we find out if it’s real.

“There’s a little gremlin inside of me that thinks, ‘Just say something shocking. You’re only here for a few minutes, say something terrible,” he told Willem Dafoe in 2018. “There’s a kind of perverse glee I get from that. But I’ve given my publicist a number of heart attacks.”

While taking all this into account, it’s more likely Pattinson was telling the truth about Dune: Part Three. Rumors that the actor has a role in the film have been circulating for much of this year, but his involvement has never been confirmed until now.

Speculation about his possible role in the movie has also been running rampant, with Dune fans guessing he could be playing anyone from the shapeshifting Scytale to Paul Atreides’ son, Leto II. While there’s no confirmation of who Pattinson plays in the movie yet, it seems like we know he’s in the movie at all right now due to the actor’s lack of filter, which is easily one of the most endearing things about him.

The Mummy: Brendan Fraser and Rachel Weisz to Return for New Sequel

The Mummy will walk the earth again. After fizzling out with Tomb of the Dragon Emperor in 2008 and being interrupted by Tom Cruise in 2017, The Mummy franchise is set to resume with a new sequel starring Brendan Fraser and Rachel Weisz. Even better, The Hollywood Reporter states that Matt Bettinelli-Olpin and Tyler Gillett of the Radio Silence collective will direct.

Originally released in 1999, The Mummy has only grown in estimation over the past quarter century. A combination of classic Universal thrills and Indiana Jones style adventure, The Mummy proved a perfect showcase for the action chops and comedic chemistry for stars Fraser and Weisz. The film launched two sequels of mixed quality, as well as a series of spinoffs about The Scorpion King, mostly of very bad quality.

Despite these lesser entries, The Mummy remains a favorite. Directed by Stephen Sommers, The Mummy stars Fraser as adventurer Rick O’Connell, who gets forced into helping librarian Evelyn Carnahan (Weisz) investigate an ancient Egyptian map. The search brings them face to face with the resurrected the high priest Imhotep (Arnold Vosloo), determined to be ruinited again with Anck-su-namun (Patricia Velásquez), the woman whose love cost him his life all those centuries ago.

Sommers used aspects of the classic 1932 Boris Karloff film, but adds a healthy dash of adventure, augmented by the winning banter between the leads. While The Mummy certainly has plenty of CGI spectacle, the limitations of the technology prevented Sommers from over-relying on it, making The Mummy feel more like an old-school blockbuster than a quickly-dated turn-of-the-century oddity.

Adding to the excitement surrounding The Mummy is the critical reappraisal of Fraser that’s occured over the past several years. An incredibly charming and handsome leading man throughout the 1990s and early 2000s, Fraser dropped from the spotlight around the time of Tomb of the Dragon Emperor. Only later would we learn that he had been the victim of poor health, brought on by accidents while doing stunts, and of sexual assault by former head of the Hollywood Foreign Press Assocation, the organization that awards the Golden Globes, Philip Berk. Fraser’s return, most notably his Oscar-winning turn in 2022’s The Whale, has been widely cheered by movie-goers.

Weisz has not been quite as absent from the movies as Frasier, but her return as Evelyn would be notable, as she chose not to reprise the role for Tomb of the Dragon Emperor (Maria Bello took over the part). Weisz has spent the 2000s and 2010s earning acclaim for her parts in The Constant Gardner (for which she won an Best Supporting Actress Oscar), The Deep Blue Sea (2011), and in the Yorgos Lanthimos costume comedy, The Favourite.

Wonderful as those movies have been, there’s always been hope that she and Fraser would reunite on screen. And with Bettinelli-Olpin and Gillett, The Mummy has found the perfect directors to guide the way. The duo already reignited the Scream franchise with Scream (2022) and Scream VI, as well as horror romps Ready or Not and Abigail.

Hopefully, Universal can get all of these magic ingredients together, to once again unleash ancient evil onto our movie screens.

How David Lynch Recruited Diane Ladd for Oscar Nominated Role

When Diane Ladd passed away on November 3, 2025, at the age of 89, she left behind an incredible body of work that includes classic movies such as Chinatown and National Lampoon’s Christmas Vacation, as well as memorable parts in the TV series Alice and Dr. Quinn, Medicine Woman. Her career lasted more than 60 years, during which she was considered for several awards, including three Primetime Emmys and three Oscars. But she almost didn’t take one of those Oscar-nominated roles, because of the man who was directing the film: David Lynch.

Lynch wanted Ladd to play Marietta Fortune in Wild at Heart, his 1990 adaptation of the Barry Gifford novel by the same name. The director picked Ladd for the part for an obvious reason. Marietta Fortune is the mother of Lula, one the story’s protagonists, played by Laura Dern, Ladd’s real life daughter. Yet, Ladd was reluctant to take the part because she hated Blue Velvet, Dern’s first collaboration with Lynch.

In a 2024 interview with Vulture, Ladd recalled that she took exception to the infamous Blue Velvet scene in which the lounge singer Dorothy Vallens (Isabella Rossellini) walks naked and dazed across a quiet suburb.

“I was angry that [Lynch] would let one of the most beautiful women in the world, Isabella Rossellini, who he was in love with, stand nude in front of the whole world and light her so horribly,” Ladd admitted. “It wasn’t just bad — it was really bad. I thought, That’s a desecration. Would he do that to the blessed Virgin Mary? Why would he do that to his own true love? She’s got one of the most beautiful bodies in the world, but it didn’t look like it when he showed it. As a woman, I took exception just to that.”

Ladd was hardly alone in that criticism. Roger Ebert famously criticized Lynch for Dorothy’s treatment in the movie, in which she is spied upon by clean-cut kid Jeffery (Kyle MacLachlan) and physically and sexually assaulted by madman Frank Booth (Dennis Hopper) before the moment that Ladd points out.

However, one person who didn’t take exception to Isabella Rossellini’s treatment in the movie was Isabella Rossellini. “I remember I was told that Roger Ebert said that [Lynch] exploited me, and I was surprised, because I was an adult,” she told IndieWire in 2024. “I was 31 or 32. I chose to play the character.”

Even with those concerns, Ladd still liked the rest of Blue Velvet, but thought her reservations would prevent Lynch from ever hiring her. “I figured I’d never hear from him again,” she told Vulture. “And then all of a sudden, out of the blue, I get this phone call and it’s David Lynch. He says, ‘Diane, I’ve written a script, and it’s gonna star your daughter and Nicolas Cage. But there’s a starring role of the mother.'”

In particular, Ladd was impressed about how Lynch never brought up her criticisms of his work. “He doesn’t say anything about the past. He didn’t ask me if I could meet again. He says, ‘I would be honored if you would star in this role for me,'” Ladd recalled. “Now, listen. When somebody appreciates you — a painting you’ve done, a meal you’ve cooked, a smile you gave them — and they’re honorable with integrity, that is like sunshine, healing every wound in your body.”

And so Ladd took the part in Wild at Heart, a movie with its own upsetting content. Ladd threw herself into the part so much that she earned an Academy Award for Best Supporting Actress, losing to Whoopi Goldberg in Ghost. But for Ladd, the experience was enough, telling Vulture that Lynch was “one of most gentle and gracious and kind directors I’ve ever been privileged to work with.”

And so, Wild at Heart serves as a monument to two great legacies, David Lynch and Diane Ladd.

Predator: Badlands Review – Sci-Fi Movie Has Killer Chemistry

There are many reasons to look back on Alien: Covenant as a disappointment. The abandonment of the Space Jockey mystery from the original film; the obligatory return to xenomorph formula by a filmmaker long since bored with it; and the callous disregard of Noomi Rapace’s Elizabeth Shaw cover most of the bases. Yet a smaller, if gnawing, flaw persists: After Prometheus ended on the amusing sight of our hero, the aforementioned Shaw, teaming up with the severed but-still-chatty head of a Weyland-Yutani synthetic (Michael Fassbender), the sequel did nothing with that anime-ready contrast.

What a surprise it is then that 13 years later, another franchise would take the concept and run with it. The way director Dan Trachtenberg even describes it, this silhouette of a lonely, out-of-his-depth Predator and the ruined synth he meets along the way is the mental image which inspired the whole Predator: Badlands shebang. If that’s true, Trachtenberg should trust his instincts evermore going forward, because Dimitrius Schuster-Koloamatangi’s diminutive Predator (relatively speaking) trekking across mountains and forests with a bisected-but-bubbly Elle Fanning strapped to his back indeed looks like something stripped from an ‘80s sci-fi novel’s illustrations page, and plays like a cinematic throwback too.

This is not to say Predator: Badlands feels like a prototypical return to the 1980s roots of the Predator or Alien franchises, with Fanning’s loquacious android hailing form the latter. This is something new for each series, and may even flirt with blasphemy among those who view the titular Predator (or Yautja, as they are apparently called in their home world’s mother tongue) as purely a villain—an extraterrestrial Count Zaroff, here to bag Arnold Schwarzenegger like he’s the most dangerous game in the cosmos. In fact, Badlands is quite a conventional hero’s journey about a Predator realizing he was the good guy all along.

Heresy? Maybe. But for those who miss the now increasingly antiquated genre movies of 20 to 25 years ago that would play their Comic-Con conceits straight, and without a trace of self-deprecating irony, Badlands’ sweeping helicopter shots of a Yautja and his broken robo-bae making tracks across New Zealand vistas is like a blast from the Hall H past. And a welcome one at that.

While largely filmed in the land of Hobbits and Shires, in Predator: Badlands this place is called Genna, the apparently most dangerous planet in the known universe. On these desolate grounds, even Yautja walk with caution, for here lives the Kalisk, a mysterious giant beast that is considered unkillable after every Predator who has landed on that planet failed to return. To most Yautja, it represents death. But for Dek (Schuster-Koloamatangi), it signifies redemption. Played by an actor of six feet in height, Dek is considered a “runt” by his father (Reuben de Jong) and the other members of his tribe. And when the movie begins, what Dek mistakes for playful training with his brother Kwei (Michael Homick) turns out to be a last chance.

Kwei has defied their father’s orders to murder Dek and “cull the clan” of his weakness. Instead Kwei reluctantly sends Dek on a likely one-way mission to Genna. There little brother will prove his Yautja bonafides by taking the head of the unkillable as his trophy… or he’ll die trying. And on a planet as hostile as this, there are plenty of other hazards that could kill him before he even finds the prize. Fortunately, there are also a handful of Weyland-Yutani synths scattered to the wind after their own exploratory mission went sideways. Among them is Thia, Fanning’s endlessly chipper automaton who’s long since lost her legs but never her ability to charm any audience—be they a movie house or an initially hostile Yautja in need of some new tools (and maybe company?).

With its spartan setup and ensemble, Predator: Badlands is regressively, and refreshingly, uncomplicated. It’s as straightforward as a ‘90s comic book about a Predator or Terminator meeting Batman, and yet it never feels dumb even when keeping things simple. This is a significant testament to the casting. While the extended prologue on the Yautja’s home planet is fairly lore (and CGI) heavy, once the film gallops toward Dek and Thia’s first meeting, the film finds its winsome two-hander energy and almost never lets it go.

Much of this needs to be credited to Schuster-Koloamatangi and the makeup team, who are able to convey the actor’s real performance despite mountains of prosthetics and some CG-enhancement. He still looks convincingly alien, but there is a more human and tactile performance in those eyes than anything ever before produced in the Predator franchise. We get a sense of Dek’s pride and also vulnerability. Still, the reason the movie works as well as it does can be largely attributed to Fanning, a warm and intelligent performer who knows how to beguile the camera with a sing-songy voice, which here can bely a brutal intelligence behind those luminous lighthouse eyes.

The actress actually does double duty in the movie, playing both Thia and her “twin sister,” the unsurprisingly colder and more typical Weyland model, Tessa, who is also wandering Genna with all her appendages intact. It’s a nice actor’s showcase to switch between ice and… if not fire, then maybe hot cocoa. But it’s really about the contrast she brings like an automated Scarecrow waiting to be struck down from a trap by Dek’s brutish Dorothy that gives the movie its predictable, albeit pleasant, heart.

Mileage might vary about that conventionality, however. While none of the Predator movies have ever been quite what I’d call subversive in their plotting—at least once you get over the fact that Schwarzenegger is little more than a slasher movie’s final girl in the 1987 original—they certainly were hard-edged. Conversely, Badlands has a deliberate adventure-movie coziness about it as Dek’s prickly exterior is thawed first by Thia—whom he mostly refers to as “tool”—and then a cuddly monkey-sized alien creature who starts following them around like a lost puppy. This is a far cry from the “ugly motherf****” days of the series’ origins, and indeed matches the movie’s new PG-13 look and tone.

Truthfully though, the lack of an R-rating only visually hurt when aliens run into some other Weyland-Yutani synthetic red shirts. Sequences like that should look like an earthquake hit a dairy farm, but Badlands’ determination to play things safe means a lack of the milky substance that comprises synth blood in the Alien flicks. Perhaps more unfortunate still, the need to make this as accessible a blockbuster as possible leads to Badlands losing much of the cerebral weightiness of Thia’s own home franchise, especially in regard to questions of what it means to be “human,” “alive,” and a company man (or woman). 

Badlands plays things down the middle as a creature-feature adventure yarn, but plays them exceedingly well. As with the tenser Predator offshoot, Prey, and 10 Cloverfield Lane, Trachtenberg reveals a strong command of tone and style in his genre efforts. Whereas those other films flirted more with horror or suspense elements, Badlands is a “survive the island” movie to the hilt, and does the concept better than the last decade’s worth of Jurassic Park and King Kong flicks. The various alien designs on Genna are nasty and fun hybrids of fangs, fur, and tentacles. And an especially clever touch is “razor grass” wherein even the planet’s flora will cut you to pieces.

All of the set-pieces revolving around Dek figuring out how to circumnavigate the planet’s native threats, often while blocking out an invasive robot’s jibber-jabber, are winners. And when the movie switches to more human-sized threats, the emphasis on in-camera fight choreography is still amusing if less exciting.

At the end of the day, I am not sure Dek is a good Yautja. He repeatedly relies on the help of other species to survive and even comes to trust a faulty earth tool that Sigourney Weaver sure as hell could never get to work right. But I also know this: he and that giddy gizmo make for the most entertaining Predator movie since the original. I am not sure it’s better than Prey, but it is a good pulpy night at the movies, and promises grand things to come as long as Trachtenberg is mapping the Predator’s next hunt.

Predator: Badlands opens on Friday, Nov. 7.

The One Demand Idris Elba Had for Stringer Bell’s Ending on The Wire

Even almost two decades after The Wire aired its final episode, the show still regularly sits atop lists of the best TV series of all time. The HBO crime saga earned its reputation in part because of the gritty and complicated portrayal of the American War on Drugs as it played out in the city of Baltimore, Maryland—a byproduct of creator David Simon‘s time as a reporter for the Baltimore Sun. It also became beloved because of its incredible characters, including Stringer Bell, the business-minded second-in-command in drug dealer Avon Barksdale’s empire.

Portrayed by Idris Elba, Bell’s intellectual approach to the drug trade made him an immediate fan favorite. And yet, the demands of realism and of the Greek tragedy approach that Simon took to story meant that Bell had to die. Understandably, Elba hated the idea of losing such a rich, popular character. But what really made him mad was the inglorious way that his killer would commemorate the death.

In his book Difficult Men: Behind the Scenes of a Creative Revolution, journalist Brett Martin recounts the initial plan for Bell’s demise. After gunning Bell down, the vigilante Omar Little (Michael K. Williams) was to urinate on the body, “apparently a real Baltimore gang tradition.”

According to Martin, that last point was unconscionable to Elba. “Elba fixated on the pee,” wrote Martin. “Omar wouldn’t be peeing on him, Simon and [episode writer George] Pelecanos said; he’d be peeing on a fictional character. ‘Not on my character,'” Elba told them.

From Elba’s perspective, the scene added insult to the injury of ending his time on the show. Martin recounted how Simon often failed to take into account actors’ feelings about the character or the job. He wouldn’t listen when Seth Gilliam and Domenick Lombardozzi expressed concerns about their characters Carver and Herc getting pushed to the sidelines. Simon even excitedly told Lawrence Gilliard Jr. about how excited the actor would be about the episode he just wrote, the episode in which GIlliard’s character D’Angelo Barksdale is killed. Martin relates the question that Simon usually posed whenever they got defensive about their character: “Whoever said it was your character?”

Yet, Simon and Pelecanos did understand Elba’s frustration and, according to the latter, tried to justify the story beat to him. “He was pissed, man. And I got it, because, in effect, we were firing him,” Pelecanos told Martin. “David and I went to his trailer and tried to talk him down. We said, ‘This is the end of the character. We can’t keep his story going, it’s not logical. And this is exactly the way he would probably go out.'”

In the end, a compromise was made, as anyone who has seen The Wire‘s third season knows. When Omar and Brother Mouzone (Michael Potts) kill Stringer, they wait a beat to acknowledge that their unlikely alliance has come to an end. Then they walk away, and the camera pans up to look through the window at a sign advertising real estate that Stringer tried to sell in a bid towards legitimacy. In a way, it’s a more poetic and damning insult than the urination.

But did the new ending appease Elba, who was still being written off the show? Pelecanos wasn’t sure as he walked home at night after the death scene was shot. “Pelecanos heard pounding footsteps behind him and turned, cringing,” wrote Martin. “It was Elba. ‘I just want to shake your hand,’ he told the writer. ‘It’s just business.'”

It’s business that Elba has certainly done well in, as demonstrated by everything from his solo crime series Luther to his role as the U.S. President in the recent Kathryn Bigelow movie A House of Dynamite. But it’s hard to argue that Elba’s ever had a character as compelling as Stringer Bell. The Wire is, after all, the greatest television series of all time.

No Knives Out for J.J. Abrams and Rian Johnson as They Reunite With a Star Wars Joke

It looks like the persistent fan misconception that there’s a rift between Star Wars directors J.J. Abrams and Rian Johnson will finally be put to bed. The two reunited on stage for a Q&A about Johnson’s Knives Out threequel, Wake Up Dead Man, this week, and the man behind The Last Jedi immediately had a Star Wars gag ready for the crowd.

“Let’s talk about the franchise trilogy everyone wants to hear our thoughts about,” he said, taking a beat before adding, “Let’s talk about Knives Out.”

The joke drew laughs from Abrams and the crowd, who’d just been treated to a screening of Wake Up Dead Man. Abrams called the film “an incredible accomplishment” that was “beyond” being called the best Knives Out movie.

He also revealed that Johnson had spoken to him during the writing process because he wasn’t sure whether expanding Knives Out’s tone for the third movie would work. Acknowledging that the film’s central character doesn’t show up for quite a while, Johnson admitted he was “very worried,” but that perhaps this fear meant it was worth doing.

Also in attendance was the star of Wake Up Dead Man, Daniel Craig, and Johnson recalled a behind-the-scenes Star Wars moment when he was more eagle-eyed than most about Craig’s acting prowess, even back then.

“When I was writing Episode VIII, we were watching dailies, because [J.J. was] shooting VII,” Johnson told the audience. “One day… it was a scene with Daisy [Ridley] where she does the Force mind control on a Stormtrooper and gets him to unlock her things. The daily came up, the Stormtrooper came up, the Stormtrooper didn’t say anything—just walked across the room to her.”

Johnson then replicated his physical reaction to the random Stormtrooper, saying that he was moved to ask who the actor was. “Pablo [Hidalgo] at Lucasfilm was like, ‘I think it’s just a stunt dude in a Stormtrooper thing,’ and I go, ‘No—that’s a real actor, just from the way they walked across the stage.’”

Even though his thoughts were dismissed at the time with a “no, dude,” Johnson noted that Hidalgo returned to him later and confirmed he was right: “Yeah, that’s Daniel Craig.”

In Wake Up Dead Man, detective Benoit Blanc returns to investigate the mystery of a murdered priest when one of his colleagues becomes a suspect. The film is set to explore themes of faith and reason tied to a crime framed as potentially miraculous.

Wake Up Dead Man will release in theaters on November 26. It will stream globally on Netflix beginning December 12.

When Should Godzilla Minus Zero Be Set?

A sequel to Godzilla Minus One is coming, and the internet could not be more excited. It’s not just that we’re getting a sequel to what might very well be the best movie about the King of the Monsters since the 1954 original. It’s also that the mysterious title and surrealistic imagery in the teaser announcing Godzilla Minus Zero has people wondering if another classic monster like Mothra is on the way.

But the biggest question should really be around the film’s setting. Although it was the 37th Godzilla movie, Minus One took place in 1945 and 1947, before the first film. The setting allowed writer and director Takashi Yamazaki to explore Japan’s misdeeds at the time, adding another layer of moral complexity to film series about the ravages of America’s attack on the country.

So as we wait for more information about Godzilla Minus Zero to surface, let’s look at some of the potential settings for the next chapter in monster history.

1960s

Chronologically, it would make sense for Godzilla Minus Zero to just hop a decade and a half later than its predecessor. Time would have passed, but not so much that we couldn’t check in on would-be kamakaze pilot Kōichi Shikishima (Ryunosuke Kamiki) and his girlfriend Noriko (Minami Hamabe). But the 1960s would also give Yamazaki plenty of thematic material to work with.

The 1960s were, of course, the height of the Cold War, when the United States and the USSR threatened one another with nuclear annihilation, while the rest of the world either took a side or stood by and prayed neither would pull a trigger. While not one of the prime belligerents, Japan’s increased connection to the U.S. made them a sometimes unwilling player, especially as America inserted itself into Korea and Vietnam, two countries with whom Japan has its own imperial history.

Between the nuclear anxieties at work during the ’60s and Japan being forced to confront both its past and its new place on the world stage, Yamazaki would certainly find the Cold War a fruitful setting for his next monster movie.

1980s

Given the wave of nostalgia that continues to sweep across the country, the 1980s seem like the ideal setting for Godzilla Minus Zero. Furthermore, the 1980s were an interesting time for the franchise, as the release of The Return of Godzilla in 1984, the first new movie featuring the monster in nine years, played as a direct sequel to the first film and launched the Heisei Era of Godzilla movies. If Yamazaki wanted to continue the meta-commentary found in Godzilla Minus One, then setting Godzilla Minus Zero in 1984 or ’85 would make perfect sense.

Moreover, the period presented an interesting turn in the relations between Japan and the United States. During the 1980s, Japan saw a surge in technological advancements, threatening in the U.S.’s place in the global economy. In other words, Japan was doing Western-style economics better than the West, using the system foisted upon them to their own ends. Those types of tensions would be the perfect place for Yamazaki to insert Godzilla, the ultimate monster born of American intervention in the East.

2020s

Before the release of Godzilla Minus One, most fans believed 2016’s Shin Godzilla to be the best post-1954 entry in the franchise. That movie used Godzilla as a metaphor for the government’s response to recent disasters such as the 2011 tsunami and Fukushima nuclear accident, getting just as much horror for bureaucratic incompetence as it does from the titular beast. Given how well directors Hideaki Anno and Shinji Higuchi reframed the central threat for Shin Godzilla, one might think that Godzilla Minus Zero should stay away from the present.

But since Shin Godzilla‘s release, every modern day Godzilla film has been part of Legendary PicturesMonsterVerse, which have their charms, but aren’t interested in commentary like the Toho films. And since Toho’s deal with Legendary meant they couldn’t make Godzilla movies for a while, the time is right for the company to bring Godzilla into the 2020s.

Obviously, Yamazaki won’t want to travel the same ground that Anno and Higuchi already trod. But with the global pandemic still front of mind, and Japan facing a massive population crisis—and with it, renewed fears about loss of traditional culture—there are sadly more than enough new anxieties for Godzilla Minus Zero to translate into kaiju action.

Kyle Gallner Is Still the Reigning Scream King

Move aside, Justin Long. Out of the way, Patrick Wilson. Ethan Hawke? How did you get here?! Look, we love you all, but it’s clear that Kyle Gallner is still horror’s reigning scream king. After news broke this week that Gallner will write and star in a new upcoming monster horror/survival thriller called Man Vs, we were simply ready to call it.

Gallner is unstoppable and, quite frankly, we don’t want him to stop. In the last 20 years, he’s starred in a string of horror flicks. Red Eye, The Haunting in Connecticut, Jennifer’s Body, A Nightmare on Elm Street, Red State, The Cleansing Hour, Scream, Smile, Smile 2, Strange Darling …that’s not even all of them. He’s also received critical acclaim in other genres, starring in the dark comedy Dinner in America and Welcome to Happiness. There doesn’t seem to be much Gallner can’t do when he puts his mind to it, and that includes being our scream king of modern horror.

From a young age, Gallner has shown the kind of onscreen vulnerability and emotional resonance that reinforces a true genre actor. His 2009 role in The Haunting in Connecticut as a teenager battling cancer who faces supernatural terror set the template for many of his horror characters: he’s really good at playing a frightened but resilient guy pushed into extraordinary circumstances.

Since then, he’s carved out an identity within the horror space in a way few supporting actors have ever managed, and in recent years, he’s made the transition to high-profile horror movies, most notably in the smash hit Smile and its sequel. As he’s matured, he’s been able to continue inhabiting grounded characters who are forced into a whirlwind of chaos, but we also never know quite what he’ll be capable of.

In 2022’s Scream, the mere sight of a dishevelled, moustachioed Gallner propping up a car was enough for horror fans to do the DiCaprio pointing meme. He can slip into characters with a menacing edge just as easily as ones with deep vulnerability, which is one of the many acting skills that make him perfect for horror. Gallner may not be a marquee name outside the horror fandom, but we love that he can always turn out to be the terrorised or the tormentor. It keeps us guessing!

We hope he’s fine with us declaring him our reigning scream king. We’d never want him to feel pigeonholed, and we’ll take all the Gallner we can get, but he has said he’s “grateful” for the label before.

“I’ll take the term all day, I’ll adopt it and wear it like a badge of honor,” he told The Hollywood News last year. “It’s a genre that I enjoy. I enjoy the fans. I think they’re some of the most dedicated fans out there. They show up, they watch the films, they talk about them, they share them, they push it out there, and it’s where I got started.”

Kyle, thank you for your service. Rest assured, we’ll watch you in anything, horror or otherwise.

In the meantime, long live our gracious king.