Dead Account: Two Blue Flames Is About the Become Your Next Mobile Game Obsession
Among the many titles being displayed at Tokyo Game Show 2026, one of the most consistently popular the entire weekend came from Smilegate, a South Korean studio specializing in mobile and PC games. The most fun that I had with any of the mobile games unveiled by Smilegate at this year’s show was Dead Account: Two Blue Flames, a top-down roguelite actioner with strong deck-building and character collection gameplay mechanics. After playing an extended preview of the game, I interviewed the creative team over email following the show.
“This was the first time we’d opened the game up to general players who were simply interested in it and, honestly, we were worried about whether they would take easily to controlling multiple characters and using their skills,” admits producer Kim Byoungki. “But most of the people who came by and played, regardless of age and gender, cleared the stages we’d prepared all the way through and gave us good scores on the survey. Having been able to watch people genuinely enjoy the game we’re trying to make is something we’re truly grateful for.”
Dead Account: Two Blue Flames has all the roguelike shoot’em up action of titles like Vampire Survivors but with an even grander scope in terms of how players can choose to leap into the chaos. The game is a deck-builder that provides players with a whole host of playable characters, each with their own playstyles and synergy bonuses depending on how they’re deployed. These characters are based on the popular manga series Dead Account by Shizumu Watanabe, which the game adapts. Even not knowing the manga source material myself, I still found the characterizations strong, both in gameplay and how the characters interact with each other on the battlefield, which is a major goal for the creative team.
“Our collaboration with the author has exceeded our expectations. He has been highly satisfied with how the game expresses his art and has offered plenty of support and advice,” Kim shares. “In working with the author, there is one thing we care about most: even if we add new dialogue for the game, the essence of the original characters must not change. For example, an ability that only got a brief mention in the manga, might need to be expanded into a full combat system in the game, or there might be a case where a character needs to deliver new lines unique to the game. Whenever this happens, we don’t just ask, ‘Would this be possible because it’s a game?’ We ask, ‘Would this character really act this way?’ That’s the standard we set for ourselves.”
As players progress, blasting through waves of all sorts of incoming enemies from all sides, they unlock additional party members to join the fray, which is especially key as the amount of enemies increases on-screen and formidable bosses attack. In contrast to other roguelike shooters, the ability to have these characters work together and unleash their distinct attacks on waves of enemies is a key component to the combat system and one of the game’s most entertaining mechanics. This aspect of the gameplay is something that the creative team have put a lot of time and care into getting right, appealing to both manga and roguelike shooter fans alike.
“Each character’s combat role comes from the abilities and the personality shown in the manga, and when they are put together with specific characters, their abilities connect and unlock new ways to play. So, we’ve worked hard to make each character’s individuality blend as naturally as possible into their playstyle,” Kim explains. “Our goal is for players to think, ‘Now that I’ve got this character, I want to try a new synergy with the ones I already have,’ when they pull new characters. And that for us is the fun in collecting—the more characters you own, the more ways you get to play.”
Every major wave of enemies is punctuated by an intense boss fight, which always commanded our full attention whenever such a formidable foe surfaced. These skirmishes call on players to bring in all the allies they’ve recruited so far, pulling out every special move just to emerge from these battles in one piece. For the developers, creating and refining the bosses were a huge priority for the creative team as defining moments within Dead Account: Two Blue Flames.
“Boss fights are where players get the biggest thrill,” Kim observes. “Players cut through waves of enemies swarming the field, refining their team synergy and characters’ traits and then hit a mid-boss or final boss, and get to see what all the growth was for. That moment when you get to unleash everything you’ve got and beat the gimmick is where the dopamine and thrill come from. And that’s exactly what we’re balancing and fine-tuning through R&D.”
Of all the mobile games that we played at Tokyo Game Show 2026, Dead Account: Two Blue Flames was our personal favorite and feels relatively close to completion, at least by our estimate. The action is smooth and intuitive, even on the smartphone touchscreen that our demo was played on, while the roguelite elements keep the experience fresh and exciting. For the creative team, this is a project that celebrates its source material while keeping things accessible and, most importantly, fun.
“Dead Account : Two Blue Flames started from a simple idea: Take the affection and growth you feel when playing a character-collection RPG, and add the fun of a roguelite – playing and strategizing firsthand,” reflects Kim. “For fans of the manga, it’s a new way to interact with the characters they love themselves, and to discover stories for each of them that haven’t been shown in the original. And for people meeting the IP for the first time, we want the game to be so much fun, that it makes them curious about Dead Account as a whole.”
Developed and published by Smilegate, Dead Account: Two Blue Flames isavailable for pre-registrationon Google Play, the App Store, and PC.
Latest X-Men Reboot Casting Rumor Suggests Marvel Is Going Back to Basics
Marvel Studios is pulling out all the stops for its upcoming X-Men reboot, including tapping Jake Schreier — who handed the MCU one of its best movies in Thunderbolts* — as director and wrangling an all-star cast that includes Inde Navarrette as Rogue, Samara Weaving as Emma Frost, and Adam Driver as a character that’s definitely Mister Sinister. However, recent casting news suggests Marvel is doing something that could set the X-Men reboot apart from the previous Fox-era movies.
Deadline recently reported that Ben Wang (American Born Chinese, Karate Kid Legends) is in the running to play Bobby Drake a.k.a. Iceman. This is a great choice for many reasons. Wang has proven himself to be a genuinely talented actor in the handful of roles he’s had, which provides some faith he can capture Bobby Drake’s sense of humor and youthful energy. But the fact that Iceman is going to be part of the X-Men reboot also confirms that the story will likely center on the original five X-Men: Cyclops, Jean Grey, Angel, Iceman and the Beast.
While most fans are used to the “All-New, All-Different” era of X-Men which brought the comic world Storm, Nightcrawler, and Wolverine (and jumpstarted X-Men legend Chris Claremont’s run with the mighty mutants), it’s rare that an X-Men adaptation has featured the original five members. The closest we’ve come is the X-Men: Evolution episode “Under Lock and Key”, and 2006’s X-Men: The Last Stand, though fans would prefer to forget the latter.
By starting off with the original 5, the X-Men reboot isn’t just avoiding comparisons to the Fox-era X-Men movies, it’s also leaning into the idea that Charles Xavier’s School for Gifted Youngsters is actually a school. Most of the characters who’ve been cast – including Sadie Sink’s Jean Grey, Kit Connor’s Cyclops, and Asa Germann’s Angel – are teenagers, and in a world that fears and hates mutants, they need a safe haven to flock to. Young adult stories are still all the rage, as Harry Potter, Percy Jackson, and The Hunger Games all have adaptations dropping later this year. Why not get in on the action with a superhero story that’s built for this genre?
While Schreier has said he’s drawing inspiration from Chris Claremont and Jonathan Hickman for the X-Men reboot, the presence of the original five X-Men also hints that he may be using Louise Simonson’s X-Factor run as inspiration. Simonson reunited the original five, but it wasn’t exactly a smooth process: Cyclops ended up leaving his wife Madelyne Pryor when he found out Jean was alive, Iceman and Beast find themselves butting heads, and Angel gets it the worst as he has his wings cut off and is transformed into Archangel by Apocalypse. The presence of Mister Sinister strengthens those ties, and spells trouble for Cyclops as the gothic geneticist is obsessed with him.
Marvel Studios had to make sure its X-Men reboot stood out from previous X-Men movies. By going back to basics with the First Class, it might have done just that.
The Leander Film Festival Puts Hollywood Stars and Independent Gems Side by Side
There’s something exciting about a film festival that gives audiences the chance to see familiar Hollywood stars in unexpected roles or discover an independent filmmaker on the verge of a breakthrough. Experiencing stories that viewers might not otherwise encounter in their local cinemas is exactly what the inaugural Leander Film Festival is setting out to accomplish when it arrives in Central Texas this month.
Running from Nov. 11 to 15, the five-day festival boasts an impressive lineup of talent, including Michael Keaton, Renée Zellwegger, Adrian Grenier, James Hong, Martin Freeman, Barry Corbin, and many more recognizable names. But the festival is equally interested in giving emerging filmmakers, international storytellers, and Texan-based creative voices a platform, making for a wonderfully eclectic celebration of what independent cinema is capable of.
In fact, the festival aims both to entertain and educate its attendees. “The Leander Film Festival is more than a celebration of film. It creates opportunities to educate, inspire, and connect our community while helping the next generation discover storytelling and filmmaking,” says Mike Herrera, co-founder of the Leander Film Festival and co-owner of CSSI Solutions.
“I’m thrilled to be part of a festival dedicated to growing film and film education in Leander,” says Laura Davis, education advocate, co-founder of the Leander Film Festival, and owner of Davis Consulting AI. “The films submitted this year are incredible, and I can’t wait to celebrate them with our community from the opening night premiere of Jimmy to our Awards Gala.”
The biopic Jimmy, which follows the life and career of legendary Hollywood actor and World War II veteran James Stewart, is definitely one of the gathering’s biggest attractions. Riverdale star KJ Apa takes on the role of Stewart in the film written by Texas-based screenwriter Justin Strawhand, who is expected to be on hand for the movie’s red carpet premiere. Apa’s co-star Kara Killmer (Chicago Fire) is also set to attend the festival’s closing ceremony.
Elsewhere festival-goers can attend a screening of Faith, a locally shot comedy starring Adrian Grenier (The Devil Wears Prada) about an unlikely pastor attempting to save a small-town Texas church. Meanwhile, Renée Zellwegger will return to her home state of Texas to make her directorial debut with the experimental animated short They. Likewise, Michael Keaton steps behind the camera for Sweetwater, a science fiction drama co-starring Kyra Sedwick that explores grief through the lens of futuristic corporate memory simulations. The film’s screening will include an appearance by award-winning songwriter and screenwriter Sean Douglas, Keaton’s son.
Latino storytelling and representation also have a meaningful place in the lineup as well. Puerto Rican actress Paola Andino (Queen of the South) appears in You Can’t Leave, while Grenier brings his own Mexican American heritage to his aforementioned comedy Faith. But perhaps the most significant Latino-centered selection arrives on closing night.
Revolution’s Daughter, directed by Peabody and Emmy Award-winning filmmaker Thaddeus D. Matula, tells the extraordinary story of Alina Fernández, the daughter of Fidel Castro who eventually escaped Cuba and built a life outside her famous father’s shadow. Featuring artists like singer Gloria Estefan, playwright Nilo Cruz, and Artist José Bedia, the documentary offers a deeply personal perspective on Cuban history and life in exile.
In addition to screenings, the Leander Film Festival will host workshops and industry panels as well as awards ceremonies with cash prizes and development packages up for grabs in the Feature Screenplay and Co-Production Pitch Market, which is designed to help emerging writers take their projects to the next level. For its first year, the Leander Film Festival is making a bold statement about what a regional film festival can be, says the festival’s organizers.
“As one of the fastest growing cities in the country, Leander deserves its own cultural anchor, and we’ve been thrilled to discover incredible local filmmakers right here in our own community,” says Sasha Yelaun, co-founder of the festival. “The Leander Film Festival marks the birth of a major new creative hub, offering a distinct, intimate alternative to the crowded landscapes of SXSW and the Austin Film Festival.”
Den of Geek will be on-site at Leander Film Festival for an interview and photo portrait studio. Stay tuned for our coverage, and for the full schedule and tickets, visit leanderfilmfestival.com.
I Play Rocky Review: A Crowdpleaser Sylvester Stallone Would Be Proud to Claim
Sylvester Stallone and John G. Avildsen’s Rocky is often cited as a quintessential 1970s movie, a perception that never seemed entirely right to me. It certainly is of its era, grounded if even superficially in the grime and weariness that defined the decade-long hangover after Nixon and Vietnam. Yet Rocky was also in many ways a reaction to that bleak atmosphere; a counterpoint to the cynicism of The Conversation or The French Connection, or for that matter Avildsen’s own Joe, which ended in 1970 by having its racist loudmouth protagonist accidentally murder his own daughter (a babyfaced Susan Sarandon).
In this kind of cultural crucible, Rocky followed up on the prescient instincts of Jaws right before it, or Star Wars shortly afterward, and gave a populist palette cleanser to the masses. It insisted that sometimes even a southpaw from Philly can go the distance.
In 1976, some critics sniffed at such sentimentality as manipulative, but everyday moviegoers ran away by the millions with to join the Italian Stallion at the feel-good circus. In ways overt and subtle, Peter Farrelly’s I Play Rocky emulates that still-winning formula, right down to embracing sentiment over the aloof ambiguity of a fall festival season release.
The movie—which tells the ever impressive story of Sylvester Stallone’s journey from out-of-work actor to a writer with a hot script he wouldn’t sell unless he got the starring role—is every bit as sweet and syrupy as Rocky. It’s so yearning, and perhaps so calculated, it practically begs audiences to forget what came later, from Stallone’s reigning diva status in ‘80s action cinema to his more modern reputation as a Hollywood Trump whisperer. And to be fair, if one can let go of any pretenses at cynicism, then it’s hard not to be charmed by this real-life fairy tale with puppy dog eyes.
Indeed, when we meet the film’s version of a young Stallone (an eerily uncanny Anthony Ippolito), just about the only thing he’s got going for him are those eyes via his beloved bull dog, Butkus. The two lived on the street for a spell before the story starts up, and things aren’t going too much better in first New York and later Los Angeles for “James” (he is embarrassed to go by his real name Sylvester). One person who actually appreciates a 50-cent handle like “Sylvester” though is Sasha Czack (AnnaSophia Robb), a young woman Stallone meets at a movie theater where they both work. She also quickly becomes the voice of needed confidence, urging him to try writing roles for himself like Orson Welles did.
Cut to not-quite two years later, and Sylvester and Sasha are married and living on the West Coast, which is probably best since it puts time zones between Sly and his abusive father Frank (Matt Dillon). But the acting career isn’t going too much better, even as his spec scripts are starting to get the attention of producers like Irwin Winkler (P.J. Byrne) and Robert Chartoff (Toby Kebbell). The duo recognize Stallone’s got talent but are eager to see if he can do something more commercial. He can.
It begins after the would-be star watches from a bar stool how real-life challenger Chuck Wepner (almost) goes 15 rounds with heavyweight champ Muhammad Ali before the Greatest defeated Wepner by technical knockout. It was close enough though for Stallone to see the value in smudging the details a little and having his fictional Rocky Balboa go the full distance against a world champion. Producers like Winkler and Chartoff also see the value in the idea. Hell, a cantankerous and a delightfully shady composite character of various United Artists executives played by Tracy Letts likes the screenplay too, despite claiming he hates boxing movies! But this one will work, assuming they get someone like Burt Reynolds or Clint Eastwood, or maybe Ryan O’Neal. But that’s of course the hitch: Stallone insists, no matter how much money they try to put in front of him, that “I play Rocky.”
The crux of the film, and its literal title, is also the most dramatically rewarding thing about Farrelly’s film. By virtue of the subject matter, we know who will ultimately play Rocky, but the way Peter Gamble’s screenplay and Farrelly’s direction ratchets up the pressure on Stallone brings into stark relief how miraculous his career breakthrough really was. Not only does the long setup draw on Farrelly’s comedic instincts to lean into the wry industry satire where a bunch of suits seem to doubt the movie star potential of Sylvester Stallone, but the film then piles on mountains of pressure atop that once invulnerable-seeming lead character.
The offers start mild enough, even in 1975 money, with Winkler and Chartoff initially trying to lowball Stallone with a $15,000 writer’s fee. Before it’s over, the weeks-long negotiation will reach closer to the neighborhood of half a million dollars, provided that Stallone accepts his fate as behind a typewriter. In every scene between those figures though, Farrelly and Gamble steadily heat the stove beneath Stallone’s feet: he can longer afford to feed Bupkis, the dog he protected on the street, and must face the prospect of giving him away; Sasha reveals she is pregnant; his would-be studio head almost catches him working as a valet in Beverly Hills! Even his father shows up in LA to turn the screws.
Farrelly is no stranger to playing fast and loose with facts in order to spin a good yarn—look no further than the lingering controversy around his Best Picture winner, Green Book—but the prevailing winds Stallone faced were so severe that he didn’t settle for a screenwriting career remains a remarkable achievement. It’s also fertile ground for Ippolito who at glance really does look like someone has de-aged Sly back to his youth. Ippolito’s performance is far fuller than impersonation, though; he gives Stallone a salt-of-the-earth underdog quality that is in obvious conversation with the Rocky character while also, if only faintly, hinting at an ego that never quite crossed over into the real Stallone’s cuddly onscreen alter-ego.
That conversation between Stallone and Rock is at its best when it’s at a whisper during the pre-production process. Once the movie goes into production, it becomes a lot more conventional, with the Rocky making-of story insisting on rhyming with the 1976 classic to the point of occasionally straining credulity.
Still, this is not all feel-good easter eggs or generic biopic hagiography. Those elements do exist, including with how much AnnaSophia Robb is similarly minimized into the role of supporting spouse by the movie’s third act, but there is still an inside-baseball ruefulness that makes it go down smooth. Byrne and Kebbell find every subtle variation of exasperation on the gradient wheel, and late blasts of energy by Jay Duplass as a tyrannical Avildsen and Stephan James as a braggadocious Carl Weathers only heightens the tone of a movie that’s at its best when it gets gossipy.
I Play Rocky is a movie that succeeds at being a lot like the character it’s named after: the thing is big, loud, and wears its heart on its sleeve. I have little idea whether it’s the “real story,” but it is definitely a crowdpleasing yarn that leaves audiences feeling like they saw the little guy win one. It’s a movie that makes you appreciate every mile Stallone walked along that distance, and in its better moments just sits with him in the toughest stretches—making the happily ever after not quite so certain.
I Play Rocky opens in limited release on Nov. 6 and wide on Nov. 20.
After Mortal Kombat and Street Fighter, This Fighting Game Needs a Movie Adaptation
2026 saw the release of not one, but two movies based on an iconic fighting game series: Mortal Kombat IIand Street Fighter. Both of these movies attempted to capture their respective franchise’s flavor, whether it was buckets of blood and gore for Mortal Kombat II, the special energy attacks in Street Fighter, or the wide cast of characters that populate both. Naturally, discussion has sprung up about which fighting game franchise should get a similar treatment, and the answer is simple: Soulcalibur.
The Soulcalibur franchise kicked off with Soul Edge in 1996, a fighting game in which eight warriors sought to obtain the legendary sword Soul Edge. Some thought the sword would make them invincible. Others sought it to end wars. But what none of them knew is that Soul Edge is a pure force of evil, and corrupts whatever it touches. The first Soulcalibur game reveals that Soul Edge has a twin: the holy blade SoulCalibur, meant to offset Soul Edge’s darkness.
Already, a Soulcalibur movie is ripe with potential. The idea of an evil sword corrupting all it touches and compelling people to seek it out? That’s a story that has more than a few shades of The Lord of the Rings, and the wide cast of characters also feels Tolkien-esque. From the dread pirate Cervantes to priestess Talim and the strange samurai Yoshimitsu, plenty of characters have their own goals and connections to explore.
Perhaps the most compelling character, and the one a future film should focus on, is Siegfried Schtauffen. A former bandit, Siegfried stumbled upon Soul Edge and was corrupted by its power, becoming the monstrous Nightmare. Nightmare is arguably the most visually compelling character in Soulcalibur: his armor is as demonic as his namesake, with one of the arms being monstrous and corrupted – hinting at how Soul Edge has driven him mad. Future games would split Siegfried and Nightmare into two entities, wielding Soulcalibur and Soul Edge respectively. It’s a dynamic ripe with storytelling potential.
Soulcalibur would also stand out because each character in the game uses a signature weapon. A great example is Cervantes, who wields two swords with a pistol built into the handle of one. The massive Astaroth has an axe the size of his body, which he can swing with dizzying force. And ninja assassin Taki carries twin short swords which she uses with lethal efficiency. While Mortal Kombat focuses on bloodshed and Street Fighter on over the top attacks, Soulcalibur could stand out with expertly crafted sword duels.
15 TV Shows We Can’t Believe Everyone Forgot: Did You?
Television has given us countless unforgettable characters, iconic finales, and shows that people still quote decades later. But what about the series that once had everyone talking and somehow disappeared from the conversation? Some had impressive casts, unusual premises, or surprisingly devoted audiences, yet rarely get mentioned when people discuss the best shows of their era. Others were genuinely entertaining but got lost among bigger hits and newer releases. Whether you watched them after school, stayed up late for another episode, or completely missed them the first time around, these 15 forgotten TV shows deserve another moment in the spotlight.
IMDb
Pushing Daisies (2007–2009)
This quirky fantasy comedy followed a pie maker who could bring the dead back to life with a single touch, creating one of television’s most visually distinctive worlds.
IMDb
Dead Like Me (2003–2004)
A teenager dies unexpectedly and becomes a grim reaper, joining a group of equally unusual coworkers who collect souls while dealing with their own unfinished lives.
IMDb
Wonderfalls (2004)
A gift shop employee begins hearing strange instructions from animal-shaped objects, sending her into a series of bizarre situations she never asked for.
IMDb
My So-Called Life (1994–1995)
This short-lived teen drama captured the confusion of adolescence with an honesty that made its cancellation particularly frustrating for its devoted audience.
IMDb
The Adventures of Brisco County, Jr. (1993–1994)
Bruce Campbell played a Harvard-educated bounty hunter in a wonderfully strange Western packed with science fiction, comedy, and steampunk inventions.
IMDb
Freaks and Geeks (1999–2000)
Set in a 1980s high school, this cult favorite introduced audiences to a group of misfits whose awkward teenage experiences felt refreshingly authentic.
IMDb
Popular (1999–2001)
This teen comedy drama explored the rivalry between a popular cheerleader and an unpopular classmate who suddenly become stepsisters.
IMDb
Sports Night (1998–2000)
Created by Aaron Sorkin, this fast-paced comedy followed the personalities and professional chaos behind a nightly sports television program.
IMDb
Ed (2000–2004)
After losing his job and discovering his wife has been unfaithful, a lawyer returns to his hometown and buys a bowling alley while trying to rebuild his life.
IMDb
The Pretender (1996–2000)
A genius capable of mastering almost any profession escapes a secret organization and uses his extraordinary abilities to help people while staying one step ahead of his pursuers.
IMDb
Early Edition (1996–2000)
A Chicago man receives tomorrow’s newspaper every morning and tries to prevent disasters before they happen, whether he likes it or not.
IMDb
Northern Exposure (1990–1995)
A New York doctor is sent to a tiny Alaskan town, where its eccentric residents turn his assignment into an unexpectedly charming adventure.
IMDb
Jericho (2006–2008)
After nuclear explosions devastate several American cities, residents of a small Kansas town struggle to survive while trying to understand what happened.
IMDb
The Middleman (2008)
A young artist gets recruited by a secret organization to fight bizarre threats, including monsters, mad scientists, and all kinds of ridiculous supernatural problems.
IMDb
Wonder Woman (1975–1979)
Lynda Carter starred as the iconic superhero in a colorful series that became a defining piece of television pop culture, even if younger audiences rarely revisit it today.
5 Great Movie Presidents to Restore Your Faith in Democracy
No matter where you fall on the political spectrum, nobody feels particularly great about midterm elections. If you’re for the incumbent party, then you’re probably feeling some trepidation, because the opposition party tends to do well in midterms. If you’re with the opposition, you’re probably mad, frustrated that this election is your first chance to claw things back to your side. In short, everyone could do with a good movie night as they watch the results roll in.
Fortunately, there are a lot of good movies about American presidents. Even better, most of them feature presidents who embody the ideals of the office, certainly more than our actual leaders. Some may call that fantastical wish-fulfillment, but we see it as an act of self-care, restoring our faith in democracy even as actual democracy seems to struggle. So take some time from watching election results and check out these five larger than life, but ultimately inspirational, movie presidents.
Judd Hammond
Gabriel Over the White House (1933)
Okay, let’s get this out of the way first: Gabriel Over the White House is an insane movie, even if you share the film’s largely progressive stance. Directed by Gregory La Cava and written by Carey Wilson, Gabriel Over the White House features a president who ruthlessly imposes his agenda, willfully becoming a dictator for the sake of equality and against lawlessness, particularly the gangsters who rose up during prohibition. At least, that’s what Hammond becomes after a near-death experience, shifting from an opportunist career politician to a social reformer, one willing to ignore his Cabinet and dissolve congress if they oppose him.
Yes, Gabriel Over the White House is an incredibly uncomfortable watch, even if you agree with some of Hammond’s policies. Fortunately, Walter Huston gives such a ferocious performance as Hammond that it’s hard not to be entertained. And as long as we understand the whole thing as a fantasy, there’s something comforting about a President willing to take a stand for the people. Just, hopefully, the real version isn’t quite so scary when he does it.
Douglass Dilman
The Man (1972)
Given that we still have only had one Black president in actual history, the preponderance of Black presidents in media from the ’90s and 2000s still feels aspirational. As such, most of these stories rarely deal with the racist backlash that follows, despite the fact that we’ve seen how such responses occur in real life. All of that makes one of the earliest depictions of a Black president, the 1972 made-for-TV movie The Man, all the more compelling.
Directed by Joseph Sargent and written by Twilight Zone creator Rod Serling, The Man stars James Earl Jones as Senate president pro tempore Douglass Dilman. After the President and Speaker of the House die in a building collapse, and the Vice President discloses a terminal illness, Dilman is next in the line of succession. A humble man who understands that greatness has been thrust upon him, Dilman does his best to overcome the skepticism against him. Although frank in its depiction of American racism, The Man believes that even hatred can be overcome by the example of a good man doing a difficult job well.
Dave Kovic
Dave (1993)
Like President Dilman, Dave Kovic also had greatness thrust upon him and also was judged according to his looks, but with very different circumstances. Dave Kovic, played by Kevin Kline, is a temp agency manager who moonlights as a look-alike for President Bill Mitchell (also Kline) for parties and other events. Dave is so good, in fact, that the Secret Service asks him to stand in for President Mitchell after a speech. And then, when Mitchell dies during a tryst, Kovic has to permanently play Mitchell while the president’s men come up with a solution.
From Dave‘s somewhat absurd premise, director Ivan Reitman and writer Gary Ross tell a sweet, optimistic tale about an everyman who ascends to the Oval Office. A fundamentally decent guy, Dave spends the first half of the movie winning over those frustrated by Mitchell, including his wife Ellen (Sigourney Weaver). But the real power comes when the political movers try to shove Dave out and return to business as usual, threatened by a good man in power.
Andrew Shepherd
The American President (1995)
Written by Aaron Sorkin and directed by Rob Reiner, The American President plays like a dry run for The West Wing, right down to Martin Sheen playing the Leo McGarry role of the president’s Chief of Staff. But Reiner emphasizes the more romantic elements, the story of a single father in the White House, President Andrew Shepherd (Michael Douglas), who courts environmental lobbyist Sydney Ellen Wade (Annette Bening).
Unsurprisingly from the guy who made The Princess Bride, Reiner brings a fairy-tale quality to the romantic plot, played with old-school charm by the leads. But when the movie turns to hard questions about political compromise and policy decisions, the fantasy becomes more pronounced, as Sorkin makes Andrew Shepherd into the prototype for West Wing president Jed Bartlet: principled, passionate, and compassionate.
Thomas J. Whitmore
Independence Day (1996)
Really, being a good movie president comes down to two things: taking action and giving a great speech. The 1996 alien-invasion/disaster flick Independence Day may have a ton of problems, but it gets these two things right with its president, Thomas J. Whitmore, played by Bill Pullman. The first half of the movie sets up the precarious state of affairs for Whitmore, a former Air Force pilot whose youth and inexperience opens him up to attacks from the opposition. The second half of the movie shows us just what kind of person he is.
Of course, Independence Day comes from schlock auteur Roland Emmerich, who co-wrote the script with producer Dean Devlin. So Whitmore proves his worth not by navigating a deadlocked Congress or crafting a complicated bill, but by shooting down aliens with his fighter jet, and by giving a dumb but rousing speech about global independence day. But, you know what? At least he gets off his butt and does something, which is more than some real presidents can say.
Heidi Klum May Have Just Spoiled The Batman II in a Very Roundabout Fashion
The Batman: Part IIis arguably the most anticipated comic book movie adaptation in some time, and yet it’s been hit with a volley of issues and delays. Director Matt Reeves briefly paused production due to a family matter, tapping Steven Soderbergh to finish principal photography. The recent Paramount/Warner Bros. merger means that The Batman: Part II will be debuting in a movie landscape that’s already gone through massive upheavals. And now, a set of photos might have revealed the villains that will be menacing Robert Pattinson’s Dark Knight. Surprisingly, however, the leak came from someone who isn’t even in the movie.
This Halloween saw some creative celebrity costumes, especially when it comes to comic books, but the person that truly embraced the spooky spirit is model and businesswoman Heidi Klum, who dressed up as a severed hand. Her makeup team, including Mike Marino of Prosthetic Renaissance (who worked on The Batman), posted behind-the-scenes photos of the work that went into making this costume to Instagram. And, in one photo posted by The Makeup Armory, eagle-eyed fans immediately spotted several character molds of actors appearing in The Batman: Part II. What’s more, the now-deleted photo seems to confirm who’s playing who. Check them out below via @TheBatmanSagaNW and also…
Beware Potential Spoilers
Heidi Klum’s Halloween makeup team has seemingly accidentally spoiled some major character secrets for ‘THE BATMAN: PART 2’ 👀🦇
• Brian Tyree Henry as Two-Face 🎭 • Sebastian Stan as Victor Zsasz 👩🦲 • Court Of Owls Mask 🦉 • Sebastian Koch will also have makeup ❔ pic.twitter.com/DmAk90COfy
First up, a mold of Brian Tyree Henry was shown with heavy scarring around one side of his mouth. This all but confirms that Henry is going to play Harvey Dent a.k.a. Two-Face. Dent is arguably one of the most tragic villains in the Batman mythos, due to being friends with the Dark Knight and Jim Gordon before being horrifically scarred by the mob. Henry’s incredible performance as Megatron in Transformers One proves that he’s capable of such a shift.
Two-Face’s presence in The Batman: Part II also implies that Reeves is continuing to draw inspiration from Batman: The Long Halloween by Jeph Loeb and Tim Sale. The Long Halloween is considered to be one of the best Batman stories ever published, thanks to its exploration of the shifting crime scene in Gotham City and the tragic fall of Harvey Dent. Reeves previously named it as one of three inspirations that helped shape The Batman, so it’s great to see that influence spreading into a sequel.
Next is a head mold for Sebastian Stan, showcasing a series of scars around the neck and face. Those scars hint that Stan is playing Victor Zsasz, who might be one of the most disturbing foes Batman’s ever faced. Zsasz originally started out life similar to Bruce Wayne, even losing his rich parents in a freak boating accident. But while Wayne took the pain of his parents’ murder and used it to fuel his desire for justice as Batman, Zsasz grew insanely nihilistic and decided to become a killer. What makes him stand out is that he carves a tally mark into his flesh for each life he takes. Fans who are used to seeing Stan as Bucky Barnes in the Marvel Cinematic Universe are in for a shock, while other moviegoers will continue to recognize that this man has serious range.
Perhaps the item that stands out the most in the workshop is a mask that comic fans will immediately recognize as belonging to the Court of Owls. The Court were the first antagonists in Scott Snyder and Greg Capullo’s Batman run, revealed to be a secret society that’s shaped Gotham City for years. The Court often employs “Talons,” undead assassins that carry out their work; given that Reeves has kept a more grounded tone for The Batman, it remains to be seen if that part of the story will be adapted on screen. The story of The Batman: Part II has been shrouded in mystery, but Heidi Klum wound up shining light on some of this movie’s shadows.
The West Wing’s Cheesiness Is Needed Now More Than Ever
Like all television pilots, the first episode ofThe West Wing has to introduce all of its characters, both their names and personalities. So the cold open of The West Wing‘s pilot gives us handsome Sam Seaborn (Rob Lowe) picking up a woman in a bar, motormouth press secretary C.J. Cregg (Allison Janney) jabbering about work/life balance while on a treadmill, crotchety Leo McGarry (John Spencer) crabbing about an error in the New York Times crossword, oddball Josh Lyman (Bradley Whitford) asleep at his desk at the office, and know-it-all Toby Ziegler (Richard Schiff) explaining to flight attendants why he should be able to use his cell phone on the plane.
The one thing that connects them is the word “POTUS,” specifically the message, “POTUS in a bicycle accident.” Each vignette treats the term like a special secret, building up to the point that Sam explains that it’s not a name, but an acronym: President of the United States. The pomp and circumstance, the smarty-pants approach to a fairly common term is just one example of the ways that The West Wing has aged poorly. But these days, when cynicism about the American government could not be higher, The West Wing‘s self-satisfied cheesiness isn’t just tolerable; it’s necessary.
In That White House
Nothing demonstrates the problems and promise of The West Wing better than the season 2 episode, “In This White House” (first aired, October 25, 2000), which introduces ongoing character Ainsley Hayes. Played by Emily Procter, Ainsley Hayes is a variation of what modern viewers recognize as a standard Fox News type, an attractive young blonde conservative who makes a splash on a Meet The Press-style roundtable show.
In the cold open to the episode, written by creator Aaron Sorkin and directed by Ken Olin, the show host condescends to Ainsley, urging her not to overreach when going up against a powerhouse like Sam. And then, as soon as the show begins, she proceeds to pummel Sam on substantive issues, much to the delight of the rest of the main cast, who watch from the Oval Office. “Did I overreach?” asks a satisfied and victorious Ainsley, bringing us into the main theme.
The rest of the episode sees President Bartlet (Martin Sheen) ordering his Chief of Staff Leo to offer Ainsley a job, precisely because he, as Leo puts it when he extends the offer to Ainsley, “the president likes smart people who disagree with him.” The rest of the staff doesn’t quite share the president’s ethos of reaching across the aisle, leading to comic moments in which C.J. has an outburst in front of her coworkers and Josh’s needling of Sam turns into genuine anger against Ainsley. For her part, Ainsley insists she won’t take the job, expressing her distaste for the “smug” Bartlet administration, a point her fellow conservatives bring up with not a few smirks of their own.
However, Ainsley’s trepidation fades via the episode’s B- and C-plots. In the former, President Nimbala (Zakes Mokae), of the fictional African country Equatorial Kundu, visits the White House to broker a deal for lower-cost AIDS drugs for his people. Thanks to Toby’s efforts, the president is able to convince pharmaceutical companies to lower their prices, provided that Nimbala’s administration agrees to certain economic rules. However, before Nimbala can go home to enact the deal, Bartlet learns that a coup has occurred in Equatorial Kundu, overthrowing Nimbala and killing his brother and two sons. Finally, in the C-plot, C.J. misspeaks to someone in the press corps, making her fear that she’s going to be called in front of a grand jury.
The C-plot mostly serves as an excuse for comedic bits of C.J. stressing out. Thus, it resolves fairly easy, when a compassionate Ainsley sees a stressed-out C.J. and offers some kind advice, relieving her worries. The Nimbala plot doesn’t resolve easily, with the President choosing to refuse the president’s offer of asylum and return to his country, despite the fact that he’ll likely be executed on the spot. However, the president’s compassion and leadership during the crisis wins over Ainsley, who not only accepts the job, but tells off her conservative colleagues for mocking the administration.
All and all, it’s top-level dramatic entertainment. The characters have easy chemistry, and Sorkin’s dialogue still sparkles today. And, in a vacuum, the stakes of the various plots have weight, all expertly acted by the cast. But once you view the episode in light of today’s politics, the episode plays much differently than it did in 2000.
Not Our White House
Watching “In This White House” today, it’s hard to not roll your eyes, if not outright wretch at some of the plot points. Throughout the episode, Ainsley takes exception to the very idea that she would choose a cushy commentator job on a news channel over the real work of politics. Yet, we have seen politicians do that very thing time and again, perhaps most famously when Sarah Palin parleyed her surprise vice presidential nomination in 2008 to appearances on Fox News and a show on TLC. Whether selling supplements or building their online brand, figures such as Glen Beck, Milo Yiannopoulos, and Alex Jones stoke right-wing anger for financial profit, hurting real people.
On the other end, the B-plot stinks of Western arrogance, portraying African countries as unstable and chaotic, especially compared to the relative stability of the US. Yes, Democrats and Republicans disagree, sometimes virulently, but they don’t murder one another. Even worse, the introduction to President Nimbala comes via one of the series’ patented walk and talks, with Leo and Bartlet discussing with irritation real South African president Thabo Mbeki’s comments about HIV, reducing a complicated issue to an opportunity to show off the intelligence of the main characters.
But easily the most grating part of the episode involves the treatment of the two parties. Ainsley believes in small government, low taxes, and economic initiatives for businesses. She disagrees with the Bartlet administration on significant issues, but she can be swayed by the force of a better argument. Throughout the episode, and Ainsley’s entire time on the show, conservatives are simply good, reasonable people with a different point of view, as are liberals. If they could just stop and hear one another out, everyone would get along.
Which is, of course, ridiculous to anyone who has been paying attention to American politics for the past 26 years. And that’s why The West Wing matters.
A Fantasy of Service
The West Wing wasn’t realistic in 2000, and it certainly isn’t realistic now. Sure, they’ll reference real-world positions in government, and will name-drop real leaders. But the show always existed more in the realm of fantasy than gritty realism. President Bartlet exists in the same way that Superman exists, a reflection of our aspirations and desires, not of people we actually know and see.
As aspirational fantasy, The West Wing shows what we wish from our government. From the president to aide Charlie Young (Dulé Hill) to the opposition, everyone on The West Wing is extremely smart and devoted. They know the ins and outs of their job, and they want nothing more than to execute it to the best of their abilities. At a moment’s notice, they’re ready to deliver impassioned speeches on even arcane topics. Toby runs himself ragged trying to convince drug companies to aid Nambala’s people, shouting down anyone who downplays the human suffering involved. President Bartlet expresses both compassion and leadership when informing President Nambala about what has happened.
But the best moment occurs when Leo completes his recruitment pitch to Ainsley. After listening to all of her concerns, Leo puts the matter bluntly. “The President is asking you to serve your country,” he tells her, and even without the music sting and camera push that follows, we understand the weight of his words, as does Ainsley.
Unrealistic? Yes. Cheesy? Indisputably. But as we trudge to the polls and watch the results in trepidation, we’ll be hit with reminders of the world as it is. The West Wing points us to a better world. Not a perfect world, but one in which people consider public service an unquestionable good, where the president acts with dignity, and where smart people are in charge. Until we can make it happen in the real world, The West Wing is a useful, if cheesy, reminder that things can, and should, be better.
Taika Waititi Should Take a Page from M. Night Shyamalan
Taika Waititi had a bad weekend. It’s not just that his latest film, Klara and the Sun, released to disastrous reviews so bad that Sony canceled a wider global release; it’s also that he went to social media, reposting an article about Klara and the Sun‘s 78% audience score on Rotten Tomatoes, along with a self-aggrandizing statement. “I haven’t read a review of anything aimed at me or my peers in almost 15 years,” he wrote, going on to describe critics as “sad lost souls who couldn’t achieve their dreams of becoming artists,” and are now “Irrelevant. Out of touch. Obsolete. In the bin.” Conversely, Waititi claimed he does “listen to the people,” a claim undercut by the fact that he disabled comments on his post.
Waititi is hardly the first filmmaker to position himself as a populist after less-than-favorable reviews. But he may find it more constructive to try a different approach, one followed by a filmmaker who went from beloved auteur to critic fodder to now a reliably safe bet: M. Night Shyamalan.
Although his debut pictures Eagle vs Shark (2007) and especially Boy (2010) received more fanfare than Shyamalan’s first two movies, Praying with Anger (1992) and Wide Awake (1998), both directors enjoyed breakthroughs on their third feature, The Sixth Sense (1999) and What We Do in the Shadows (2014), respectively. From there, Shyamalan was declared “the Next Spielberg,” delivering well-received thrillers such as Unbreakable (2000) and Signs (2002). But by the time that The Village hit in 2004, critics grew tired of the conventions in Shyamalan’s work, particularly his stilted dialogue, the airlessness of his movies, and an over-reliance on twists.
Waititi followed What We Do in the Shadows with Hunt for the Wilderpeople in 2016, a mostly slice-of-life drama with absurdist edges, and then became a household name with 2017’s Thor: Ragnarok, still recognized as one of the best MCU entries. Although the strange Holocaust dramady Jojo Rabbit (2019) split audiences and critics, it received multiple Oscar nominations, including a win for Best Adapted Screenplay. From there, however, it was all downhill for Waititi, as Thor: Love and Thunder (2022) was met with a lukewarm reaction, and the 2023 soccer comedy Next Goal Wins barely made a ripple in the larger consciousness. And we all know what’s happened with Klara and the Sun.
It’s hard to pinpoint what, exactly, went wrong for Waititi. A controversial Oscar player will always be met with blowback, so it’s no surprise that some critics and audiences were angered by Jojo Rabbit‘s success. Further, Thor: Love and Thunder hit just as superhero fatigue set in, as audiences have grown tired of even a more unconventional entry in the genre. Finally, Waititi himself became something of a celebrity, perhaps overestimating the public’s interest in him as a figure. For many, rumors about his love life and lackluster performances (see: the noxious riffing he does as a cool boss in the Ryan Reynolds comedy Free Guy) made Waititi an irritant, despite the success of the TV series What We Do in the Shadows and Our Flag Means Death.
In short, Waititi became too big, too hyped, and too separated from what he does best. The exact same thing happened to Shyamalan, who went from small, somewhat sappy genre pictures with a nasty edge, to bloated, high-concept messes like The Last Airbender (2010) and After Earth (2013).
By the time What We Do in the Shadows hit theaters, M. Night Shyamalan was a byword among movie fans, an utter joke. Yet, he’s managed to recover, to the point that all of his movies do fairly well, and fans are waiting with excitement for his next picture, Remain, a collaboration with romance author Nicholas Sparks, of all people.
How did things turn around for Shyamalan? It wasn’t lashing out at critics, even though he did do some of that. In his most self-indulgent film, Lady in the Water (2006), in which he cast himself as the world’s most important storyteller, Shymalan also cast Bob Balaban as a bitter, snotty critic, one who gets justly mauled by the movie’s monster.
Rather, it was by going small again. To hear him tell it, he had to learn to be scared again. Starting with the nasty little found-footage movie The Visit (2015), Shyamalan has mortgaged his house to fund his movies, betting entirely on himself instead of a studio. But for us viewers, Shymalan has simply gone back to doing what he does best. There’s no more talk of him being Spielberg, no more sticking his name on too many undeveloped projects. He makes small-scale horror movies that are kind of sweet, kind of nasty, and totally idiosyncratic.
Not everyone can accept the open-hearted absurdity of Old (2021) or the utter disregard of realism in Trap (2024). But there are enough people on Shyamalan’s wavelength for those movies to keep making money, almost completely redeeming the reputation he seemed to have lost.
Waititi can do the same. What We Do in the Shadows has been his most enduring property, even more so than the blockbuster hit Thor: Ragnarok, but Hunt for the Wilderpeople is likely the model that Waititi needs to follow: A simple story about his native New Zealand, something he knows well and most others do not. The movie has a strong emotional core, anchored by great performances from the late Sam Neill and young actor Julian Dennison, with still room for Waititi himself to come in and be weird.
Shyamalan managed to shrug off the colossal expectations placed upon him and get back to the business of making movies that only he could make. There’s no reason to believe that Waititi couldn’t do the same. Critics were the biggest champions of his first movies, urging “the people” to whom he now appeals to go check out Boy, What We Do in the Shadows, and Hunt for Wilderpeople. And if he makes another unique picture like those, we critics will be back to urge people to check them out.
But to do that, Waititi needs to stop worrying about social media, stop telling us he doesn’t care about critics, and stop being a public figure. He just needs to do what Shyamalan does and make his movie. If it’s good, critics will be his biggest supporters again
I Stayed in a Haunted Airbnb Near Death Valley. Here’s What I Heard.
The owner saw him first: a grizzled, bearded man leaning around the refrigerator at 2 a.m., staring right at him. During my three nights in that same haunted Airbnb in Beatty, Nevada — the desert town known as the Gateway to Death Valley — I never saw the miner. But I may have heard him.
I made the Airbnb-hosted trip for a Halloween episode of Talking Strange, the paranormal pop culture show (check it out on YouTube, Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and wherever you find your favorite shows). Beatty is just shy of two hours from Las Vegas, and although it’s a popular stop for hikers and mountain bikers, it’s also a hub for spooky travelers with a haunted saloon, haunted old casino, a freaky underground church possibly connected to Charles Manson, and a ghost town up the hill.
The Haunted Miner Cabin Airbnb
Home base was three old miners’ cabins joined into one house downtown. Derek Stonebarger and his wife, Dorian, bought the property in 2020 and spent four years restoring it, a side project for the entrepreneur behind Las Vegas spots like ReBAR, Davy’s Locker, and the new art-filled Arty’s Steakhouse. Derek loves old historic bars, which is part of what kept drawing them back to Beatty. The cabins came from the boomtown of Rhyolite.
“Around 1925, so maybe 10 or 12 years after everybody had left Rhyolite, the cabins were brought down to… downtown Beatty,” Derek says.
Travel Nevada notes Rhyolite’s buildings were dismantled and moved as the town died. Today the house is miner chic, with rustic bones and modern guts. It has three bedrooms, two bathrooms (one with a whirlpool tub), and a full kitchen with a bar area. Out front is a big patio with a fire pit and plenty of spots to lounge, per the listing. There’s also a sealed room behind the bathroom wall hiding a historic shower. Derek left that corner alone. By then, he’d met his spectral housemate.
Around 2022, at 2 a.m., Derek — who admits he had a few drinks, and had never believed in ghosts — saw a figure lean around the fridge.
“We made eye contact. It felt like it took seven seconds,” Derek says. “And then, when I looked back, he was gone.” The experience changed him. “I was not really a believer, but I know now that there’s something,” he tells me.
He slept on the porch that night. The next morning, he told his wife, “Babe, I saw a ghost last night.” Dorian has never seen anything, but she still gets nervous when Derek falls asleep before her. Derek, meanwhile, can’t stop talking about it. “I’ve been telling people the story ever since, because I know it happened,” he says.
Renting the house out was never the plan, but after that night, he wanted to share it and let guests “see if they can find more… ghosts.”
He still pours the old miner a shot of whiskey before he leaves, and it’s usually somewhat gone when he returns. Maybe it’s evaporation.
As for me, I investigated the cabin, and also left a camera rolling in the empty cabin. Visually, I didn’t capture anything. But the audio caught pops, shifting, maybe a footfall. Could be an old house settling as the desert cools. I still can’t explain it. Then I sat by the fire pit under a sky that earns Beatty its spot on what Travel Nevada calls the Park to Park in the Dark route.
I’m not the only one poking around. The Ghost Adventures crew filmed at the cabin, the Sourdough Saloon, and the Exchange Club for an episode airing later this season.
Ghost Stories at the Sourdough Saloon
The Pahrump Valley Times says locals date the Sourdough to anywhere from the Rhyolite boom to the 1940s. Its ghost stories are less disputed. There’s the Shadow Man pacing one corner (Derek, who has invested in the bar, thinks it may be a reflection), an upstairs rumored to have been an illegal brothel, and, Derek says, several past owners who died in the building.
Bartender Hutch, who owns more than 200 sports jerseys and banters like a pro, tells me about a bartender who looked into the window’s reflection at closing and saw a man on the stool behind her. No one was there. In the back room, where cook Tim runs the kitchen, I felt a heavy vibe at least twice. Not scary, but heavy. When you go, order the pizza and the Sourdough Smuggler sandwich.
Voices in the Exchange Club
Across the street, the Exchange Club dates to 1906, per Travel Nevada, and now wears an ornate steampunk facade. Inside, staircases drop into the dark, and the upstairs, rumored to be a former brothel, still has what is believed to be the original once-colorful carpet.
My guide, electrician Danny, has never seen a ghost. But from his shop in the back, he hears voices. “It’s like people talking, like right outside my door,” Danny shares. He can make out a man and a woman, two or three different voices. He walks the building, but doesn’t encounter a living soul.
The Underground Church With Charles Manson Lore
Behind the Sourdough, an unplanned “follow me” led me through brush and down steps into an underground church with a dirt floor. Locals say Charles Manson frequented it. I couldn’t confirm that, though Manson was arrested at Barker Ranch in the Death Valley backcountry in 1969. It isn’t technically open to the public, but that doesn’t seem to stop any curious explorers. Touring this structure in the pitch black is a daunting and freaky task — as long as you don’t have any concerns about spiders.
Voices in the Rhyolite Ghost Town
Rhyolite boomed after Shorty Harris and Ed Cross found gold in 1904, with the town growing to about 5,000 people in six months, per Travel Nevada. The National Park Service calls the Panic of 1907 “the beginning of the end.” By 1920, 14 people remained. Karl Olson, its Bureau of Land Management caretaker, and unofficial mayor of the ghost town, knows the old maps by heart. Karl is yet another amazing character in the area, who loves talking about history, and trading strange-but-true tales of Rhyolite. And he’s clearly deeply passionate about preserving what’s left of the town.
“This place comes alive for me ’cause I know where they lived,” Karl tells me. “I’m actually going through time.”
Alone on Millionaire’s Hill, near the remnants of a fireplace and chimney, I heard mutterings and whispers. Not wind. I tried to engage. Nothing clear came back. Still, for a brief moment I felt like I had interrupted an old conversation between Rhyolite’s phantom residents.
Also don’t miss the Bottle House (made with reportedly 50,000 old bottles) or the ghostly Last Supper sculpture next door at the Goldwell Open Air Museum.
Death Valley: Artists Palette, Mesquite Dunes, Mosaic Canyon
The National Park Service credits Artists Palette’s rainbow hills to iron oxides and chlorite. The Mesquite Flat Sand Dunes feel like another planet — fittingly, they stood in for Tatooine in Star Wars: A New Hope. In Mosaic Canyon, polished marble narrows go eerily silent, and a raven followed me in like a chatty guide as I scrambled up rocks on the moderate-to-challenging hike. No ghosts were encountered on my outdoor adventures in Death Valley, but the area was imposing and magical.
Tips for Visiting Beatty
In addition to the Sourdough, eat at Mama Sara’s for scratch-made burritos and fiery salsas, carry cash, and catch Beatty Days in late October. Come for the ghosts. Stay for the people, the pizza, and the stars.
Listen to the full Beatty episode of Talking Strange and my interview with Derek. Check out Talking Strange on YouTube, Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and wherever you check out your favorite shows. And don’t miss new episodes of my show Paranormal Caught On Camera on Travel Channel and HBO Max.
SNL’s Greatest Legacy May Be In The Competition It Inspired
Saturday Night Live‘s cultural imprint is unquestionably massive, as is the list of comedy stars who have come through the show in its 52 seasons. But the new documentary, SCTV: The Greatest Show You’ve Never Heard Of, reminds us of a lesser-known legacy: the many competing shows it inspired.
Launched in 1975, SNL took the world by storm with the help of Second City Toronto alums Dan Aykroyd and Gilda Radner. Second City Television (eventually shortened to SCTV) started a year later in response, giving remaining troupe members an outlet. But the two shows were vastly different.
With its “live from New York” setting, celebrity hosts, and musical guests, SNL presented as a high-wire spectacle with a weekly hook. SCTV, on the other hand, was taped from Toronto without the added star power or crossover appeal. A smaller-scale alternative driven solely by comedy, it was felt more deeply than widely, with interconnected sketches lampooning cheesy pop culture conventions.
Though SCTV launched to keep Toronto’s finest comedy minds from migrating south, SNL still looked at it as a possible talent pool. There’s a story in the doc about a “disaster” of an audition in which SNL creator Lorne Michaels brought in SCTV stars John Candy, Joe Flaherty, and Dave Thomas. It did not go well. “After this horrible set, we went to Lorne’s table. He didn’t say anything,” recounts Thomas in the doc before archival footage shows a Candy interview where he jokes that there must have been “something wrong with [Michaels’] throat because he couldn’t talk. Either that or he was very rude.” It’s a rejection that SCTV co-creator and producer Andrew Alexander says Candy was “stung deeply by.”
Michaels would have a much stronger connection with the next great sketch group to hail from his native Canada.
The New Kids And Lorne’s Growing Influence
When Michaels returned to run SNL in its 11th season, he brought “Kids in the Hall” troupe members Bruce McCulloch and Mark McKinney with him as writers. And while that didn’t take, Michaels later produced the full group’s sketch series. The Kids in the Hall had a vastly different sensibility than SNL; daring, dark, and occasionally cinematic in its influences and output.
Like SCTV, the Kids In The Hall series didn’t qualify as a ratings hit, but it inspired religious devotion among its fans in the early ‘90s (and beyond).
While not a sketch show, the Michaels-produced Late Night with Conan O’Brien warrants a mention for its connections to SNL (O’Brien and head writer Robert Smigel), its penchant for using sketches and characters to establish its absurdist tone, and the role it played in introducing Amy Poehler and the Upright Citizens Brigade to audiences.
An Era Of Controversy And Competition
From Andrew Dice Clay-inspired boycotts to the Sinead O’Connor pope photo tearing, and a blistering New York Magazine takedown, the ‘90s were SNL’s toughest decade.
High-profile cast members like Adam Sandler, Chris Farley, and Norm Macdonald were pushed out at the insistence of network execs. Other big-name additions to the cast proved underutilized or a poor fit, like Janeane Garofalo, Sarah Silverman, and Chris Rock.
The ‘90s also opened the floodgates, and SNL faced real competition from numerous comers.
With its focus on obscure pop culture references, The Ben Stiller Show shares more stylistic DNA with SCTV than SNL, but the connection remained. Stiller had left the mothership after just four episodes because he wanted to direct short filmed sketches. Ben Stiller Show cast member and writer Bob Odenkirk had a much longer, though somewhat tumultuous, run as a writer on SNL.
Despite winning an Emmy, the short-lived Ben Stiller Show’s most enduring legacy may be that it’s where Odenkirk first teamed up with his Mr. Show partner, David Cross. That show, which featured eventual alt-comedy stars like Scott Aukerman, Brian Posehn, Paul F. Tompkins, Jack Black, and Silverman, often ranks near the top of lists of the best sketch shows of all time.
The State is another ‘90s gem with long-lasting influence thanks to the work of David Wain and Michael Showalter as filmmakers. While the show seemed more traditional than Stiller’s creation, it was sneakily subversive. The State targeted the same younger audience as SNL, but it had substantially more bite.
While cable showed the greatest appetite for boundary-pushing sketch comedy, Fox was also heavily invested in taking the fight to NBC and SNL. Created in 1990 by Keenen Ivory Wayans, In Living Color broadened the opportunities and storytelling present in a genre often distressingly devoid of non-white male actors and writers. Starring Wayans, his sister Kim, his brother Damon (who had previously been fired by SNL), David Alan Grier, and Jim Carrey, the show flourished.
With uproarious comedy and recurring characters like Homey D. Clown and Fire Marshal Bill, In Living Color was better at being SNL than SNL, particularly to anyone under age 30. It was also an incredible launchpad, with Carrey (who had failed to land SNL in multiple auditions) becoming the biggest box-office star in the world. This was followed by Sandler stepping into his own as a movie star and Rock becoming the most relevant stand-up comic in the game. SNL’s misses and early exits were making a lot of noise.
While In Living Color earned praise and buzz at the start of the ‘90s, Mad TV came in mid-decade as its replacement, a direct competitor to SNL airing on Saturdays at 11 p.m. While the show had its fans and success stories (namely Keegan-Michael Key and Jordan Peele, who went on to create Key & Peele), it’s not on the same comedic level as these other shows. Still, its original run lasted 14 seasons, and it definitely pushed SNL.
Chappelle, I Think You Should Leave, And SNL’s Relic Phase
Rivaling the kind of provocative comedy SNL practiced at its inception, Chappelle’s Show also had a rare gift for driving word of mouth with memorable sketches. Clayton Bigsby, The Player Haters’ Ball, and Charlie Murphy’s True Hollywood Stories all hit before the advent of YouTube and social media. That ability to travel and endure speaks to the quality of sketches that could have never found a place on a more conservative show like SNL.
Former SNL cast member Tim Robinson’s I Think You Should Leave is the closest thing to Chappelle’s Show in terms of virality, leaning on Robinson’s specific comedic awkwardness. In an era where reaching a niche audience is more permissible than ever, something like I Think You Should Leave has a level of cachet that something mainstream like SNL can’t hope to attain. Especially when its tools are limited to stunt casting, shock value, and uninspired political comedy in an era of unmatched real political absurdity. Add sponcon sketches, and myriad ways for young comics to get exposure outside the SNL pipeline, and it’s clear SNL needs some kind of reinvention. Even its U.K. spinoff seems fresher and livelier by comparison.
That said, I want to be a little kind to SNL in the end. David Letterman’s Late Night was a response to Johnny Carson’s Tonight Show. The result was a chaotic, rule-breaking form of comedy that has influenced everything from the shows in this article to Hot Ones.
Similarly, none of these additional sketch shows get the chance to impact comedy culture without an SNL to react to and rebel against. While that sounds like a slight, it’s actually a tribute to SNL, extending its legacy beyond its own (still impressive) historical output and making it part of a larger portrait of comedy in the 20th and 21st centuries.
SCTV: The Greatest Show You’ve Never Heard Of is available to stream on Netflix now.
The eBay Most Wanted Collection Auction Celebrates Car Culture in Gaming
eBay Live is expanding into automotive sales while celebrating the history of cars in video games, including titles like the upcoming Grand Theft Auto VI. To commemorate this, eBay Live has unveiled its eBay Most Wanted Collection, four cars going up for auction in a livestream hosted by Fast & Furious star and noted automotive enthusiast Sung Kang alongside automotive influencer and creator Hert. With 100% of the proceeds going to charity, benefiting the Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation and Kang’s own history shopping through eBay for his own personal car collection, hosting the event was a no-brainer.
“eBay is really important for my personal car builds because most of the cars that I mess with are pretty old and the parts are no longer offered by OEM [original equipment manufacturer]. So I use them for rare parts,” shares Kang in an interview with Den of Geek. “With eBay (and I’m not just saying this because I’m working with them), it’s 100% secure. Everyone has dreams of creating their dream build. For these rare parts, I always tell everybody to go on eBay because they’ll find it. You can find anything there and it’s always secure.”
More than just talking to Sung Kang about the eBay Most Wanted Collection event, we got to test-drive each of the four cars being sold through the auction for ourselves. The cars included in the collection are a 1975 Chevrolet Supernova, a 1992 BMW 325i convertible, a 2006 Dodge Viper, and a 2022 Chevrolet Corvette C8, each modified to be the coolest cars on the road. All four cars handled beautifully and could easily fit in the high-octane worlds of classic car games like Midnight Club or Need for Speed. Each of the auctions for the cars start at $6, making the event accessible to hardcore automotive aficionados and newcomers looking to dive into car culture alike.
In getting to drive the cars around Los Angeles streets and obstacle courses testing our skills, each of these cars handled marvelously, with the Corvette being a particular favorite of mine. Both the Corvette and the Nova have automatic transmissions while I had to remember my old manual transmission know-how to drive the BMW and Viper, having not had to drive a stick-shift for over a decade. In getting to drive these vehicles, I recalled my own love of cars, rooted in movies like Bullitt and James Bond in addition to games like Forza Horizon and, of course, Gran Turismo and Grand Theft Auto.
For Kang, his interest in cars began when he was a kid, struggling to fit in with his peers, before he encountered a Korean War veteran in his neighborhood who was constantly working on his 1969 Chevrolet Impala SS. The man became a mentor to Kang, patiently answering questions from the young boy visiting his garage, with Kang noting that this figure taught him to value things under the hood rather than just on the surface. These insights have informed in all walks of life as he’s grown older and into his career and something he tries to impart to others that he meets.
“Unbeknownst to me then, he was teaching me what an honor it is to be a caretaker for these old cars. That Impala was the best of him. He put his nostalgia, his history, his love, his passion into it and he was able to use it as a tool of mentorship for me,” Kang recalls. “You can apply those lessons in life, as I have as I’ve gotten older and become a filmmaker. Those are lessons that I try to pass down to other people that are getting into car culture today when I meet them.”
The eBay Most Wanted Collection Auction is as inclusive as these automotive events get, serving as a full on celebration of car culture, with a particular emphasis on the legacy of cars and gaming. This intersection of passionate fandoms is what the event is all about and that its proceeds are going to a great cause makes this a can’t-miss afternoon for anyone who’s ever dreamed about driving the super stylish rides that gamers enjoy in any number of high-octane titles. It’s this celebration of the community around cars that particularly appeals to Kang, something he’s gotten to experience on a global level through his work starring in the Fast & Furious movies.
“We as humans need something to connect with,” Kang observes. “We need a community. Maybe it’s because we all have a car story. Every single human being has been in a car at one time. But as opposed to the car, it’s the memory that you have in the car. That’s something that’s just global. I’ve realized through the Fast & Furious franchise, the privilege I’ve had is that I’ve gotten to meet the global car community. I’ve got a garage clicker to everyone’s car story. It’s been really cool.”
Folks, start your engines. The eBay Most Wanted Collection Auction is set to be the automotive sales event of the year with a killer starting bid.
The eBay Most Wanted Collection Auction on eBay Live at SEMA begins at 3pm ET on Thursday, November 5 through eBay Live. Those interested cancheck out the collection hereand set a reminder.
Patrick Stewart: A Man Who Bridged Our Past with the Future
I only ever saw Sir Patrick Stewart once in person. It was on stage at the Cort Theatre in New York City, where he starred opposite his late-in-life best friend Sir Ian McKellen. Rife with humor, but also the crushing existential misery that makes Samuel Beckett’s Waiting for Godot such a challenge, both for performers and often the audience, Stewart’s performance as Vladimir brought a sense of affectionate doddering to a man waiting for everything and nothing—life to have a point, or for death to end it.
Admittedly though, I was in the audience for a matinee particularly to observe Stewart and McKellen at the top of their craft. As has become an increasingly common phenomenon in 21st century theater, theirs was a casting that brought metatextual baggage and delight, with Stewart and McKellen having famously played frenemies for decades in the 20th Century Fox era of X-Men movies. While the characters of Charles Xavier (Stewart) and Erik Lehnsherr (McKellen) have existed on the page for 60 years, it was the real undying bromance of Stewart and McKellen, two classically trained stage actors, which gave their superhero material a gravitas still rare in the cape genre, be it comics or on-screen.
I’ve thought a bit about that over the last day while mourning the loss of Sir Patrick, who passed away this week at the age of 86. A thoroughly British performer who grew up in the provisional part of Yorkshire during the rough rebuilding years of the mid-20th century following the Second World War, Stewart discovered acting as an outlet and escape. He used it to quite literally reinvent himself. It’s thus always a marvel to remember so much of his refined diction and presence was a presence he honed over many years, particularly while working for the Royal Shakespeare Company during the 1960s and ‘70s.
Yet something I fear many take for granted when they think of Stewart’s most beloved roles—be it Jean-Luc Picard of the Starship Enterprise or the aforementioned Professor Xavier of the X-Men franchise—is that here was a genuinely classical actor who made us feel better about the future via reminding us of our past.
In some sense, this could be quite literal. Recall that Stewart worked with the Vivien Leigh (if you haven’t, please watch his lovely reverie of Scarlett O’Hara) and Orson Welles. He genuinely was a link to the glories of a different world. But in a grander notion, he is also a product of a theatrical tradition that goes back centuries. That includes Leigh and her tempestuous union with Sir Laurence Olivier, but it also goes back to the literal times of William Shakespeare and Christopher Marlowe, dramatists who used the English language to reveal the joys and sorrows, and even the silliness of what it means to be alive.
One of Stewart’s earliest screen roles, and still among his best performances, is as Sejanus, the Roman Praetorian Prefect in I, Caudius, a man who might have begun his slow power grab with the noblest of intentions. Opposite the likes of Derek Jacobi as the titular “dumb” Roman Emperor, John Hurt as the far more sadistic Caligula, and Siân Phillips as a divinely evil empress-in-the-wings, Livia, the series is still a near obscene showcase of British thespians who’d rotate their seasons between the West End and the BBC.
Among this company, Stewart’s gift was always being able to find the pathos and empathy in the material, making hard, even morally dubious men like Sejanus, pitiable. Through the lens of Ancient Rome, it’s the stuff of tragedy, but in his most famous roles, he built a glistening vision of the future.
While Star Trek has always offered a vision of the 24th century that is shimmering in its promise of better days, and a case can easily be made that the original Star Trek series with Kirk, Spock, and Bones, will always reign supreme, it was Stewart’s Picard and the more egalitarian (if faintly patrician) tone he set on the Enterprise bridge that made Gene Roddenberry’s dream of tomorrow seem tangible. Star Trek: The Next Generation asked Stewart to partake in some occasionally ludicrous scenarios—did you see the episode where he went back in time and became Robin Hood?—but he always treated it with the weight and grandeur of Shakespeare or Beckett.
This might be even better crystallized in what he and Ian McKellen achieved in the original 2000 X-Men movie. Now a bit of a relic of its time, caught between the bombastic excesses of ‘90s action movies and the modern reinvention of the superhero subgenre that occurred a few years later, courtesy of Sam Raimi’s Spider-Man, the original X-Men trilogy is stuck somewhere between those poles, especially in its first installment. The characters wear the black leather of The Matrix and speak of mutation like this is a sci-fi thriller dystopia.
But it is again the performances, including Hugh Jackman but most magnanimously Stewart, that gives that first X-Men a dramatic heft and grounding that escapes many of the far more expensive superhero movies of today. The film’s dated and the special effects are stilted, as is its barebones screenplay, but Stewart makes the dream of Charles Xavier’s School for Gifted Youngsters seem miraculous; a genuine sanctuary for marginalized and ostracized children who sadly remain a timeless staple in any era.
On the comic book page, Xavier is actually quite aloof and a little bit cold, depending on the writer, but Stewart’s unbounded warmth and deep reservoirs of empathy blow past any such characterization. His Xavier is too kind and preternaturally fatherly to ever be a jerk, even when poor screenplay choices in the likes of X-Men 3 attempt to frame him that high-handed way.
It was almost superhuman how Stewart could imbue any material with hope and humanity. It came from deeply knowing our roots, at least in the great English dramaturgical tradition, and infusing it into stories of tomorrow. Whether science fiction television, or a superhero genre at its absolute nadir following the campy histrionics of Batman & Robin, Stewart saw it all with the potential of the Bard and made you believe in something better. He will be missed.
Mama Bear Explained: What Curry Barker’s New Horror Short Is Really About
This article contains spoilers for Mama Bear.
Horror fans’ latest obsession is back with a new short film. Just days before Halloween, Obsession director Curry Barker returned to his original format with Mama Bear, a five-minute short film that once again deals with the supernatural and a cursed relationship.
But unlike Obsession, Mama Bear isn’t quite as clear in its plot, let alone its themes. No need to waste a One Wish Willow hoping to understand it. We’re here to explain the story of Mama Bear and what it could mean.
Mama Bear Plot Synopsis
Mama Bear opens with blackness and the sounds of Jazzersize, a cheesy version of Van Halen’s “Jump” playing from an exercise show on the television. The first visual we see is that of Floyd (Jon Lee Richardson), a young man in a cleaning company uniform dozing on the couch of a stately home, a collection of neglected supplies waiting next to him. The camera lurches forward as Floyd’s phone starts buzzing, getting closer with each ring until its sleepy owner finally answers.
The voice on the other end immediately shocks Floyd awake, warning that a woman named Lacey (Katie Sarife) is coming to kill him because she doesn’t care about the justice system. A clearly confused Floyd demands an explanation, but the other person provides none, just simply ranting about how much he loves Floyd and believes in justice, even if Lacey does not. The voice pauses just long enough to let out something like a chuckle, which Floyd takes as indication that this is all a joke, allowing himself to exhale. The voice quickly disabuses him of that notion and demands to know Floyd’s location. When Floyd answers “the Wilsons,” the voice mutters, “We’ve got him,” and hangs up.
At this point, Floyd begins to take notice of all the signs he missed. He sees multiple missed calls from Lacey and his mother, and a voicemail from the former that consists of little more than screaming. Floyd’s phone dies before he can play more, and, while he searches for a way to charge, he sees three things: a trail of blood on the floor, a bloody wrench on the table, and a shadowy figure (Joshua Snyder) in the corner. A startled Floyd demands answers from the figure, who gives no answer, only takes disconcerting and unnatural shapes.
Then, Mrs. Wilson (Ericka Kreuz) arrives, chatting on her phone about an impending divorce and insisting that her ex can have “Milo” instead of the house. She’s shocked to see Floyd still there, and even more shocked by the blood and the presence of the shadowy figure. She shuts the door as Floyd tries to explain that he has no idea what’s going on, which she takes calmly but with concern, especially when the voice on the other end of the phone starts giving directions.
Before she can follow the advice of the voice, a gunshot blows open the door and in strides Lacey, still in her pajamas and her face distorted by tears and anger. She demands to know why Floyd did what he did, and Floyd insists he cannot answer and does not know. Unsatisfied, Lacey begins shooting wildly at Floyd, sending him crawling behind a couch. There, Floyd once again insists that he doesn’t know anything, but Lacey won’t hear it. She fires multiple times into the couch, cutting through Floyd.
That’s when the shadowy figure emerges, showing himself in full. He looks like Floyd, covered in blood and flashing a cruel smile. Confused, but realizing she killed the wrong person, Lacey screams as we cut to black.
That’s what happened on screen. But what happened offscreen?
The Meaning of Mama Bear
Clearly, Lacey thinks that Floyd killed somebody close to her, presumably with the bloody wrench, and instead of waiting for the law to sort it out, she wants to take vengeance into her own hands. Also, the crime was notable enough that others heard about it, including Floyd’s mom, his friends, and possibly Mrs. Wilson’s lawyer, who may have been coaching her on how to handle the fact that Floyd was still in her house.
Furthermore, the crime must be horrific enough that Floyd’s friends would turn against him, using the pretense of caring about him to find out about his location and hunt him down.
Nothing in the movie explains who Floyd killed, but the title of the movie gives a suggestion. “Mama Bear” is a colloquialism, popularized by former Vice Presidential candidate Sarah Palin, to describe a mother who will do anything to protect her children. Palin and others use the phrase to imply righteous lawlessness, as if they will destroy anything and anyone who gets in between her and her children.
From that hint, and the anger and shock of everyone around them, it seems that Lacey thinks that Floyd killed her child, possibly a child they had together. That theory certainly tracks with Obsession, which also dealt with a relationship turned horrific. Furthermore, the relative young ages of the main characters heightens the anxieties around parenthood and other markers of adulthood, something touched on in Obsession and has served as the thematic driver of many great horror movies, including David Lynch‘s Eraserhead.
Other elements in the film reinforce this broken family theme, such as the brief inclusion of Mrs. Wilson. Mrs. Wilson clearly has some form of success, complete with a nice house and the money to pay someone to clean it. But she’s also in danger of losing the house as her marriage falls apart. There’s a real coldness when she offers up Milo in exchange, whether Milo is a pet or a child. Combine those points with the fact that Floyd’s mother has literally lost contact with her child.
Mama Bear also carries Obsession‘s concern with the loss of selfhood. Floyd obviously did not kill anyone. Instead, it was a demon or creature who looks just like Floyd, something that Floyd recognizes as himself, but isn’t him. Moreover, the way that the Other Floyd responds to his questions by contorting itself furthers that misrecognition, refusing to use words when it answers and only using strange, inexplicable gestures.
Finally, Mama Bear shows that Barker hasn’t lost his comic timing. Before making his feature film debut with Obsession, Barker made comedy shorts on the internet, mostly absurd sketches with perfect comic timing. As dark as Obsession often gets, it also has comedic elements, from the presence of Andy Richter to the moment when a wish for a million dollars comes true.
A New Obsession
Together, then Mama Bear is a short about the loss of self and the fear of family, all in an absurd and elliptical short film. Or it may not be any of those things. Where Obsession was a film that got overdiscussed and overanalyzed, with good reason, Mama Bear may be just more of an exercise, where the ambiguity is an intentional part of the final work. Perhaps we’re not supposed to know what happened.
Whatever the purpose or meaning, we can be sure of one thing. Mama Bear proves that Obsession wasn’t a fluke, and Curry Barker is already establishing himself as a master of horror.
Patrick Stewart Finally Became a Star Trek Captain in TNG’s First Great Episode
The Captain has left the bridge. Patrick Stewart has died at the age of 86. With his passing comes the opportunity to remember the remarkable body of work that he left behind, including roles on the stage and screen, ranging from genre works like Dune and X-Men to stirring reinterpretations of Ebenezer Scrooge and King Claudius. But for most of us here at Den of Geek, Stewart is synonymous with Jean-Luc Picard, Captain of the USS Enterprise on Star Trek: The Next Generation.
Even after the character veered more toward action in the movies, Picard will forever be defined by his patrician presence, the impassioned and eloquent speeches he delivered about maintaining one’s duty or showing empathy for the unknown. He was an inspiring, compassionate figure, one fully distinct from his predecessor Jim Kirk and casting a shadow over Sisko, Janeway, and all who followed. And that persona did not come together until relatively late in the show, in the season two episode “The Measure of a Man.”
Unlike its predecessor, The Original Series, but very much like every series that followed, TNG did not start out strong. The first season is largely an embarrassment of reused scripts written for the abandoned TOS sequel series Star Trek: Phase II and failed ideas, such as the more feral Ferengi. Furthermore, many viewers, Trekkies and casuals alike, weren’t quick to accept a crew without Bones or Spock, and especially not a bald Englishman in the place of the dashing and toupee-wearing Jim Kirk.
The cast were not unaware of these problems. They all expressed frustration with the series and saw it as a dead end, most obviously Denise Crosby, whose character Tasha Yar dies late in the season. For his part, Stewart stayed in a hotel and kept his clothes packed during the shooting of the season, convinced that he would be fired at any second when the series was canceled. To that end, Stewart also distanced himself from the rest of the cast, who quickly developed a jovial sense of camaraderie. Stewart described himself as “a severe bastard” in his recent memoir Making It So, admitting with embarrassment that he chided his castmates for having fun.
All of this means that Star Trek: The Next Generation wasn’t Star Trek: The Next Generation in its first season. And even though the second season isn’t much better, it is better, as the cast begins to find its place. Geordi and Worf get promoted and assigned to engineering and security, respectively. Riker grows his beard. And Patrick Stewart establishes himself as the Captain Picard we know and love today.
That establishment comes with episode 9 of season 2, “The Measure of a Man,” written by Melinda M. Snodgrass and directed by Robert Scheerer. In “The Measure of a Man,” a Starfleet scientist named Bruce Maddox (Brian Brophy) arrives to study Data. An expert in the works of Data’s creator Dr. Noonien Soong, Maddox plans to disassemble Data to understand how he works, with the hopes of manufacturing more copies. When Data refuses, Maddox asserts that he is Starfleet material and not a person.
To save his crewman, Picard demands a military trial, one overseen by Captain Phillipa Louvois (Amanda McBroom), with whom he has a complicated past. While Picard takes the role of Data’s defense attorney, Louvois appoints Riker as Data’s prosecutor, and threatens him with sanctions if he does not argue to the best of his ability against his friend.
What follows is a fascinating bit of courtroom television, expanding the philosophical debates that Kirk, Spock, and McCoy would have in TOS and turning into a full-length trial. Maddox expresses his admiration for Data as a wonder of technology, Riker proves his point by pressing a button to shut off Data’s processors, and Guinan (Whoopi Goldberg) compares the dehumanization of a sentient being like Data to slavery.
Inviting Maddox to the stand as a hostile witness, Picard questions the three criteria used to establish personhood: intelligence, self-awareness, and consciousness. After proving that Data has intelligence and self-awareness, Picard runs into an issue, admitting that he doesn’t know how to measure consciousness. Rather than hide from this admission, Picard leans into it, pressing the fact that none of them there actually know how to measure consciousness. Moreover, because Maddox plans to create a thousand versions of Data, he’s effectively creating a new race. For that reason, Starfleet must be very careful when deciding on the consciousness and value of a new race.
“Your Honor, the courtroom is a crucible. In it we burn away irrelevancies until we are left with a pure product, the truth for all time,” he pleads, leaning slightly forward and softening his voice before moving into the final boom. “Your Honor, Starfleet was founded to seek out new life,” he points out, before turning toward Data and declaring, “Well, there it sits. Waiting. You wanted a chance to make law. Well, here it is. Make a good one.”
Stewart is captivating as Picard delivers the lines, shifting from a deep, resonating voice to quiet reservation. He makes his body huge while projecting his strongest arguments and pausing to give his audiences, both fictional and real, time to consider the Captain’s points.
In that scene, Stewart proves that he understands the stakes of his role. Picard’s argument doesn’t just carry on the Star Trek tradition of thoughtful, high-concept genre television. It gets to the heart of what sci-fi does so well, its contribution to the humanities, in its ability to ponder fundamental questions about the nature of humanity. Even in terrible episodes like “Code of Honor,” we all knew that Patrick Stewart was a great actor. But in “The Measure of the Man,” when he delivers that final defense, Stewart proved that he could meet and exceed the measure of a Captain.
Patrick Stewart Was the Leader We All Wanted to Believe In
Many performers get tagged with the label legend. Sometimes that feels a bit ambitious. But for Sir Patrick Stewart, it’s a word that doesn’t feel grand enough. A classically-trained actor from a working-class family in Yorkshire who spent decades with the Royal Shakespeare Company before mainstream fame came calling, his career spanned over six decades on stage and screen. His death at the age of 86 has left multiple generations of fans in mourning, whether they first discovered his talent on the bridge of the USS Enterprise, in the hallways of Xavier’s School for Gifted Youngsters, or at a Broadway theater.
A quintessential British actor with a distinctive baritone voice (he dropped his Yorkshire accent in drama school), Stewart played all sorts of roles over the course of his long career. Some of his more offbeat choices included a flamboyantly gay interior designer (Jeffrey), the owner of a skinhead Nazi bar (Green Room), a debaucherous deputy CIA director (American Dad!) and King Arthur’s father-in-law (Excalibur). But his legacy for so many of us will always be tied to two surprisingly similar men: Jean-Luc Picard and Charles Xavier.
Granted, Picard and Xavier are separated by at least a thousand years and several galaxies. One is a powerful telepathic mutant; the other is a French starship captain. But these men were not just compelling characters; they were genre-defining figures who helped reimagine what these kinds of stories—so often mocked or looked down upon—could be and do. It’s easy to see why Stewart was drawn to these roles, and why audiences everywhere responded so strongly to his performances in Star Trek: The Next Generation and the X-Men films. These are the kinds of leaders we wish to see in the world: Intelligent, empathetic, thoughtful, diplomatic, and morally upright. Men who believe in the better angels of humanity (or alien kind, depending on your perspective) and who exhort those around them to do the same.
After the bombast of William Shatner’s James Kirk, Stewart’s Picard initially felt like something of a strange choice for The Next Generation’s captain. In fact, Stewart’s agent told him the role was unlikely to disrupt his stage career, since the show probably wouldn’t make it past a single season. Instead, it ran for seven and changed Stewart’s life, along with those of millions of fans in the process. As a character, Picard was remarkable for many reasons, but perhaps for nothing so much as his ability to model a different kind of masculinity in a genre space heavy with hot-headed action types. Picard’s leadership style skews more diplomatic and philosophical than belligerent, seasoned with a heavy dose of empathy and emotional intelligence. He’s the kind of captain you go to war for, but who would never ask you to. And Stewart consistently finds the humanity and vulnerability in a figure that, in a different sort of show, could have stayed remote, stoic, and untouchable.
Stewart’s presence in the X-Men films does much the same. The fact that he signed on to these movies at all feels like something of a miracle. After all, he was an actor who’d already irrevocably tied himself to one long-running franchise; why would he make the leap into another? But his decision to play Xavier had far-reaching consequences we’re still seeing onscreen today. His presence helped legitimize the entire concept of comic book movies as a serious cinematic enterprise in a way that no previous outing had yet managed. And while Hugh Jackman’s Wolverine may have been used as the face of the X-Men films, Stewart’s Charles was undoubtedly the franchise’s heart. (There’s a reason that Xavier is the character that somehow keeps being brought back to get killed off over and over again.)
Stewart’s performance softened many of Xavier’s more comic-accurate arrogant edges, adding a warmth and tenacity that made the character believable as both a mentor-ish father figure and a steadfast leader who refuses to give up—on his students, on humanity, on a helmet-wearing villain who was once his best friend. The franchise’s most outspoken idealist—occasionally bowed, but never broken—Xavier constantly advocates acceptance, forgiveness, patience, and second chances. “Just because someone stumbles and loses their way doesn’t mean they’re lost forever,” he tells his younger self in X-Men: Days of Future Past, a mantra that should feel preachy, but instead is a time-looped reminder of his own most sincerely held belief.
Even off-screen, Stewart was a consistent beam of light in a world (and industry) with far too much darkness. He purposefully used his fame and platform for good, speaking out against domestic violence, advocating for animals, and being a generally fabulous LGBTQ ally, often with his BFF Sir Ian McKellen by his side. He even took to reciting daily sonnets over social media during the COVID-19 pandemic in the hopes of offering calm and comfort during the global lockdowns. They say never meet your heroes, but many of the traits fans most loved about Stewart’s characters seemed clearly reflected in his real life.
That Stewart and his work meant a great deal to many, many people is evidenced by the almost uncountable number of tributes pouring out onto the internet tonight, from former co-stars and friends to talk show hosts, advocacy organizations, brands, and fans from all over the world. But while we have lost a true legend, his impact will live on long after him, in every viewer his work touched, and in a pair of franchises that probably wouldn’t exist today without him. To paraphrase Winnie the Pooh author A.A. Milne, how lucky we were indeed to have had something that makes saying goodbye so hard.
James Gunn Says DCU Harley Quinn Role Is Margot Robbie’s If She Wants It
Harley Quinn is causing chaos once again. But this time, it’s not her fault. After all, the entire universe changed around her. The first film version of Harley Quinn came to the screen in Suicide Squad, a little-loved movie that rode the superhero boom to a huge box office return. While that movie suffered from countless problems, everyone agreed that Margot Robbie was the perfect Harley Quinn. Everyone did not agree, however, about the quality of her (excellent, in this writer’s opinion) follow-up, Birds of Prey (and the Fantabulous Emancipation of One Harley Quinn).
So divisive was Birds of Prey that people wondered if James Gunn would use the reboot of the DCU to recast the character, despite the fact that he worked with her on his first (pre-reboot) project, The Suicide Squad. In today’s DC Studios Showcase podcast, Gunn set the record straight. “Harley is a character I’m almost certainly going to use the DCU, and if Margot wants to play her, then I’ll bend over backwards to explain that in the world,” he declared. “But if she doesn’t, then I might have to go with someone else, where I don’t have to acknowledge what happened to Harley in this universe.”
The statement comes in a special episode in which Gunn, along with co-hosts and Peacemaker stars Jennifer Holland and Steve Agee, address questions about canon in the DCU. It’s certainly not the first time that Gunn has had to wrestle with the question, as even Den of Geek directly asked him about it, back when he described himself as “a balanced canon guy.”
But Harley Quinn poses a particularly tricky problem. Harley, of course, stems from television originally, first appearing on Batman: The AnimatedSeries, where voice actor Arleen Sorkin set the character’s spunky attitude and Bronx accent. Harley immediately became the break-out hit of the show, and soon not only arrived in the comic books, but regularly carries her own series. She’s the main character of a beloved HBO animated show, where she’s voiced by Kaley Cuoco, and was recently played by Lady Gaga in Joker: Folie à Deux.
In other words, there are a lot of different takes to choose from when it comes to Harley Quinn. And Gunn has shown that he’s willing to go in interesting directions when it comes to recasting characters, most notably David Corenswet replacing Henry Cavill to play a more innocent Superman and Kyle Chandler replacing Ryan Reynolds to play an older Green Lantern.
But, thus far, The Suicide Squad has been largely canonical to Gunn’s DCU. He’s only made changes to that movie when its absolutely necessary, and has carried over nearly every event and character, a point demonstrated by the fact that Rick Flag Sr.’s hatred of Peacemaker, who killed his son in The Suicide Squad, led to the creation of Salvation, the prison planet at the center of next year’s Man of Tomorrow.
For Gunn, the bigger issue is Robbie’s talent as a performer. Throughout the podcast episode, he praises what she was able to bring to the role, while also acknowledging that her status has only grown since then. He may want her to play Harley one more time, but she may just not have room on her schedule to make it happen.
Which would be a shame. While other performers can and have brought something interesting to the character, Birds of Prey remains one of the most compelling takes on Harley Quinn, one that fully moved her out of the Joker’s shadow (but not yet quite to Poison Ivy’s side) in the public opinion. Her twisted fairytale princess sequences in The Suicide Squad are among the best scenes in Gunn’s filmography. They would both benefit from working on another Harley Quinn project again.
But as of right now, we just don’t know what will happen. Which is exactly how Harley wants us to feel.
VisionQuest Snuck in a Cameo That Harkens Back to Ultron’s Finest Hour
This article contains spoilers for VisionQuest season 1 episode 6 and Marvel’s What If…?.
Who watches the Watcher? Lots of eagle-eyed viewers of VisionQuest, apparently, because one of them took to social media to claim that a pair of glowing dots on a monitor shown in Episode 6 belonged to Uatu, that other-worldly being from Marvel lore who can only observe, and never interfere with, major events. Turns out, those viewers were right, prompting kudos from showrunner Terry Matalas on X.
However, the bigger question may be, “Who watches What If…“? Because those who did catch up with Marvel Animation‘s series about alternate realities would know that the Watcher has very good reason to check in on Ultron, reasons that may affect the rest of the MCU.
In the comics, Uatu the Watcher is best associated with one of his first significant appearances, arriving with the coming of Galactus in 1968’s Fantastic Four#48–50. Since then, the Watcher’s presence is synonymous with a major event, some shift that would shake the very foundations of the universe.
However, the Watcher’s most regular appearances came in the anthology series What If…?, which began publication in 1977. In each issue of What If…?, the Watcher would greet the reader and invite them to join in observing another reality, one in which events from the mainline Marvel universe happen slightly differently, resulting in major changes: What if Wolverine killed the Hulk in their first meeting? What if Captain America became the President of the United States? What if Uncle Ben had lived?
The three-season Marvel Animation series on Disney+ What If…? followed this model. In each episode, the Watcher (voiced by Jeffrey Wright) shows viewers variations in the multiverse, in which T’Challa becomes Star-Lord instead of Peter Quill, or Peggy Carter takes the super-soldier serum instead of Steve Rogers. Like the comics, most episodes of What If…? were just fun little exercises in canon, enjoyable but forgettable.
However, the first season did involve an interesting, multi-episode arc, one that dealt directly with Ultron and the Watcher. In the penultimate episode, “What If… Ultron Had Won?,” the Watcher observes a world where the events of Avengers: Age of Ultron play out differently. Here, he defeats the Avengers and uses nuclear weapons to destroy humanity. So when Thanos arrives, seeking the Mind Stone in Vision, he gets killed by Ultron, who takes the Infinity Gauntlet for himself.
With the Gauntlet in hand, Ultron becomes aware of the Watcher, and the multiverse itself. Ultron attacks the Watcher, drives him from the Observation Plane, and begins an attack on the multiverse. Of course, the attack gets repelled in the season 1 finale, “What If… the Watcher Broke His Oath?”, in which the Watcher agrees to interfere (his comic book counterpart does this a lot), and assemble heroes and villains from across realities to fight back, finally destroying Ultron.
Which brings us back to VisionQuest. Since What If…? arrived on screens, the Watcher has been a fun easter egg in MCU projects, showing up to see the destruction of Genosha in season 1 ofX-Men ’97 or observing the death of Vanessa Fisk in Daredevil: Born Again‘s second season. In VisionQuest, he appears in one of the monitors that Vision’s AI’s use to see how Ultron courts Jocasta, sealing their relationship with a promise to destroy humanity.
Is the Watcher watching because he’ll always show up when a Marvel TV show starts moving into its final act? Or is he here because he intimately knows just how dangerous Ultron can be? We’ll have to wait until the final two episodes of VisionQuest to find out if the Watcher’s watching is worthwhile.
VisionQuest streams new episodes every Wednesday on Disney+.
Breaking Bad’s Giancarlo Esposito Pitches a Gus Fring American Dream Origin Show
Not even the biggest Mr. Show fan would have expected Saul Goodman to be the Breaking Bad character to get a spinoff series. And not even the biggest Breaking Bad fan would have expected Better Call Saul to be such a nuanced, rich series, equal (if not exceeding) the show that proceeded it. Most would have expected a spinoff to go to the series compelling villain Gus Fring.
Giancarlo Esposito agrees. Speaking with The Hollywood Reporter, Esposito admitted, “I would’ve loved to have examined that part of Gustavo’s life. If there were a [spinoff] show — which I, in my brain, have already created — you’d see that there’s the other side of Gus.” He even had a title for the show, dubbing it “The Rise of Gus,” and explained that it would reveal “where [Gus] came from in Chile and how he was a made man there, but he was made in politics. He could have become the president running the country, but he decided to give all that up to become self-made in America.” Given that synopsis, it sounds like The Rise of Gus would be a companion piece to both Breaking Bad and Better Call Saul.
When we first met Gus Fring in the episode “Mandala” from Breaking Bad‘s second season, he already appeared to have achieved a type of American Dream. The courteous man who met with Walter White to inquire about the quality of the chicken served by his restaurant, Los Pollos Hermanos, seemed well-put-together and in control, successful in his business. Over the next seasons of Breaking Bad and in Better Call Saul, we saw just how much Gustavo Fring had truly achieved, coming from Chile to the United States to take control of the area’s drug smuggling trade.
But if The Rise of Gus were to happen, it would fully flesh out the story, certainly borrowing from classic crime narratives such as Scarface and The Godfather, stories about people who come to America and find their dreams can be fulfilled… as long as they work outside of the law.
Such a story would pair nicely with Breaking Bad and Better Call Saul. Creator Vince Gilligan has never been secretive about the fact that both shows grapple with the American Dream, albeit cynically. Even at the start of Breaking Bad, Walter White is a nondescript science teacher who must turn to crime when the American healthcare system fails to meet his medical needs. His assent as Heisenberg happens outside of legitimate, legal channels, an assent made more striking by revelations about his work at Grey Matter Technologies.
Better Call Saul complicates things even further, showing how a talented lawyer like Jimmy McGill can’t find an ethical way to use his talents, nor can his even more intelligent (and less self-destructive) brother Chuck. As Jimmy transforms into Saul Goodman, he achieves some degree of stability, if not quite success. And even that goes away with the fall of Heisenberg’s Empire.
We may know the ultimate explosive end that Gus Fring meets, but everything up unto that point plays like the paradigmatic American Dream. Gus comes from another country with nothing in his pockets. Through his brilliance and hard work, he makes opportunities for himself. He takes unglamorous but steady work in the fast food industry to subsidize his dream, and keeps it around to help him expand his earnings. No chance goes wasted, no connection forgotten. He realized everything that America promises.
It’s just that he had to be a criminal to do it, just like Heisenberg, just like Saul Goodman.
At this point, it seems like The Rise of Gus will only exist inside Esposito’s head. But were it to be a reality, Vince Gilligan’s tryptic would be a coherent, and damning, look at America’s promises.
Brian Tyree Henry On New ‘Spaghetti Western Steampunk’ Anime Bass X Machina
This article appears in the new issue ofDEN OF GEEK magazine. Find out how you can subscribe to get the full physical copy right here!
Brian Tyree Henry has never been afraid to let his geek flag fly. “When I took this show, I remember thinking, ‘I hope I get Black nerd street cred,’” Henry admits. “I’m a Black nerd. I’m a total geek. I love cosplay. I love Comic-Con. I love comics. I love animation. I love anime. I love it. I love it. I love it.” That being said, despite Henry’s enthusiasm, it hasn’t always been easy to find representation in these forms of fandom.
“What I’ve noticed about some of these arenas is that they don’t really reflect how much we really love it. It doesn’t often feel like we are part of the narrative of that story,” he adds about representation. “What’s really great about Bass X Machina is that it’s existing in this land that we created and that’s so intertwined in such a wonderful way. They’re all trying to figure out how to exist in this world that’s denied them something. I’m hoping that fans, episode to episode, can root for somebody that looks like them.”
Bass X Machina, an upcoming animated series from Studio Mir that’s set to hit Netflix on Nov. 3, is described by Henry as a “crazy Spaghetti Western, steampunk punk rock” adventure. The series, which Henry executive produces and stars in, follows a heightened version of Bass Reeves, the first Black deputy U.S. Marshal, who fights for justice and his family in a wayward world that’s steeped in danger. The eclectic blend of genres on display in Bass X Machina brings to mind iconic anime space Westerns like Trigun, Cowboy Bebop, and Outlaw Star. It hits all the right bases for a challenging experiment that doesn’t feel the need to limit its options, which is also part of what makes it so exciting.
“I always start with my inner nerd with every project that I do,” explains Henry. “I’m like, ‘What does my inner geek want? How do I feed him? How do I shut him up for at least a day or two?’ and this will do it. I’m quite excited to release Bass to the world.” In the case of Bass X Machina, it’s been a three-year-long journey to let Bass Reeves loose and establish a new normal for anime heroes.
“I want Bass X Machina to create space for other Black nerds like myself who maybe don’t really feel like they’re seen,” he continues. “I’m hoping that Bass really creates a space and a lane that brings out more stories like this, more adventures like this, and more heroes like this. I want it to speak to Black audiences, but I want it to be global as well. I want people to be excited about seeing something so fresh.”
Clearly, Bass X Machina isn’t lacking in ambition, either on-screen or off. It’s a madcap mix of influences, styles, and spectacles that keep the audience’s heart racing from the jump.
“We’re gonna make you feel stuff,” teases Henry. “We can say that we really went there and created this badass, funky eclectic brand-new way to tell a story of this historical figure that really existed. And where else better to do it than animation?”
“Could a live-action version of this exist? Sure,” Henry adds. “But I think that in the world of animation seeing characters like this exist is so necessary, especially in the time that we’re in now. Animation has always, in my mind, been a form of protest against the norm. It can speak and reach people that you never thought would listen to certain beliefs. Animation just has a further reach than if it were live-action.”
When it comes to Bass X Machina’s animation, South Korea’s Studio Mir (Devil May Cry, Kong: Skull Island) has gone above and beyond with its work here. Meticulous visuals, radical displays of power, and brutal battles punctuate every episode.
“Each episode is a final boss,” jests Henry in reference to the endless obstacles that Reeves faces on his blood-soaked rampage. “Every story needs a hero and every story needs a villain. The crazy thing about this show is that there are so many villains. Post-Civil War has a lot of villains in it. You’re watching Bass fight through most of that.”
And on the topic of the series’ excessive brutality, Henry explains that blood is essential to Bass X Machina’s storytelling. “The overarching theme of the show is about blood. Blood ties. Blood loss. Bloodshed. What it all means. What it really means to be blood. There will be blood this season.”
This contemplative carnage would still hit hard if Bass X Machina were a complete work of fiction. However, it’s even more evocative due to how it holds up a distorted mirror to society.
Explains Henry, “We’re dealing with real-life things. We’re dealing with segregation. We’re dealing with oppression. We’re dealing with all these atrocities that happened in this country at this time. After the Civil War was a time of Reconstruction, but it was also covered in so much blood. So much loss.” Henry is honored to communicate that through genre-bending animation.
Henry couldn’t be more thrilled over Studio Mir’s work on Reeves’ revenge, but there’s another aspect of Bass X Machina that he argues is just as important to its identity. “The music is one of my favorite parts,” gushes Henry over Janelle Monáe’s Wondaland collective and their bold work on the series. “We’re using Indigenous music, drums, and sounds. We’re using African instrumentation. We’re also pulling from the funk era, using jazz and hip-hop, and blending tones to really challenge what Westerns can sound like.” Henry praises Wondaland for not just rising to the storytelling and animation’s level, but actively elevating it. “Do not skip the theme song, I promise you. You’re going to want to watch it every episode.”
Brian Tyree Henry couldn’t be prouder of the series they’ve put together and for audiences to finally see Bass Reeves in action. He’s also hopeful that this is just the start of many adventures to come for his metal-armed lawman. “There are so many stories that are waiting for Bass,” he says. “There are so many things to discover.”
The 13 Coolest Looking Werewolves in Movie History
There are certain rules you need to know to survive a horror movie. Jamie Kennedy’s Randy Meeks codified them for a post-slasher world in the 1990s via Scream. But if you’re a fan of far more classic cinema—or the lore that inspired it in the case of Robert Eggers, director of this Christmas’ Werwulf—then there are even more foundational commandments that should be obeyed: Beware the moon, stick to the road, and whatever you do, don’t go investigate that howling out on the moors.
More than any other mythical creature of legend this side of vampires, the werewolf is the monster we most associate with spooky season and Halloween. The concept goes back to the Ancient Greeks if not further, with the dread of transforming into a beast tapping into something literally primal… and perhaps seductive to a certain point-of-view. In the last century of moviemaking, the canon has been especially crystallized: the silver bullet (or weapon), the fear of wolfsbane, and of course the full moon. And yet, despite that general universality, the look of the werewolf has evolved and changed through the decades, with bipedal and quadruped lycanthropes alike earning their fans and detractors. But which is, purely aesthetically speaking, the coolest looking furry monster?
This Halloween, we’re going to determine exactly that with the below ranking of the fiercest, scariest, or just outright fun werewolf designs to bare their fangs on the big screen…
13. Bram Stoker’s Dracula (1992)
We start this one with a cheat since, technically, Gary Oldman plays a vampire and not a werewolf in the misleadingly titledBram Stoker’s Dracula. However, at the same time, Francis Ford Coppola was faithful in acknowledging that Irish author Stoker really did conflate vampirism and werewolfism as one in the same in his book, as did some folklorists before him. On the page, the literary Count Dracula would seem to turn into a literal wolf from time to time. But in this film, Coppola being Coppola, means Oldman’s Count turns into a bestial horndog.
The makeup team of Greg Cannon, Michele Burke, and Matthew W. Mungle won an Oscar for a reason on this movie, and there is something appropriately retro in the modern age of prosthetics and dawning CG that Coppola essentially did a throwback design to Jack Pierce and The Wolf Man, except he covered Gary Oldman head-to-toe in fur since this monster is as much a lothario as he is lethal. Fun fact: he’s also the werewolf design that most haunted modern horror director Eggers, who said “I saw him ravaging Sadie Frost on that bench, and I was way too young to see that, and it was pretty scary.”
12. Van Helsing (2004)
For readers who were an impressionable age in 2004, we suspect this could be the gold standard. There’s no denying that the general design of the Wolfman in Stephen Sommers’ Van Helsing is fun, combining the far more lupine features of modern movie werewolves with the bipedal posture of its namesake.
That blend of old and new earns Van Helsing a place on this list, but honestly the creature is just a little too garish in its CG appearance to be higher up in the ranking. Whether it’s the early Wolfman that Hugh Jackman puts down in the movie or the midnight-hued iteration our heroic Van Helsing in turn becomes at the end, both look more like cartoons than creatures of terror.
11. Cabin in the Woods (2012)
Here we admit is a deeper cut considering how minor the werewolf is in the absolute monster mash madness of director Drew Goddard’s Cabin in the Woods. Beginning ostensibly as a satire of the “deviltry in the wilderness” branch of horror—think Evil Dead or The Hills Have Eyes—the film, which is co-written by Joss Whedon, turns into a cacophony of every trope and cliché in horror, complete with killer clowns, unicorns, and even an honest to Cthulu merman.
In this context, the werewolf gets both a small but pivotal role, as it and not-Pinhead are the third act creature reveals that let our surviving heroes realize how doomed they are. The werewolf also gets to be the beastie that later seals that fate when it mauls Kristen Connolly’s not-so-nice Final Girl in the movie’s blood-soaked climax. And as realized purely with prosthetics and animatronics, it’s pretty badass. Pity it’s not in the movie more.
10. The Werewolf of London (1935)
If we were ranking purely based on iconic status, Henry Hull’s grandaddy of Hollywood lycanthropes would be closer to the top. There is something, indeed, unforgettable about what Jack Pierce admirer Rick Baker calls “the Elvis of Werewolf Designs” because of the monster’s widow-peak rising back into a quasi-pompadour. This is apparently because actor Hull did not want to sit in makeup artist Pierce’s chair for as long as Boris Karloff did to become the Frankenstein Monster or the Mummy a few years earlier.
Furthermore, the screenplay of Werewolf of London is also a curiosity. Before its far more famous Universal Pictures stablemate redefined the werewolf archetype six years later, this film points to how nebulous the mythology around werewolves still tended to be. So Hull’s lycan can (at times) speak and otherwise strategize when he dons a cap and scarf to conceal his furry intentions. He’s more Jack the Ripper or Mr. Hyde than a bestial id, more man than wolf. But that adds to his charm as being a kind of outlier in the subgenre to this day.
9. Curse of the Werewolf (1961)
Did you know Oliver Reed was a werewolf? Of course you did, but we mean he played a literal one too for Hammer Studios! Curse of the Werewolf is a strange work. It’s loosely adapted from the far better (if still grotesque) novel The Werewolf of Paris by Guy Endore, but its medieval concerns about generational evil and the sins of the father being passed down are turned mostly into misjudged Hammer titillation mingling with stories of rape and incest.
Be that as it may, this was Hammer’s one stab at the werewolf movie, and when it finally gets to the moment where Reed wolfs out, it is indeed a B-movie delight with Roy Ashton’s more barbaric makeup design vaguely evoking Lon Chaney Jr. while adding sharper fangs, heavier fur, and of course brighter red blood, as is Hammer’s wont. It’s an iconic look for the bipedal wolfman that needed to be in this movie more.
8. Dog Soldiers (2002)
What if we did Aliens but with werewolves in Scotland? That very well could have been the elevator pitch for Neil Marshall’s Dog Soldiers, a movie where elite British soldiers attempt to get a little practice done in a remote corner of the Scottish Highlands, and instead find themselves trapped in a house surrounded by lycanthropes. There is just a bare minimum of emphasis on transformation or the tragedy of becoming a monster. Otherwise, this is balls-to-the-wall, guns blazing action-horror.
That remove from typical werewolf movie tropes is perhaps why the monster designs are so joyfully gnarly. With a minimum of fur on the legs, but a maximum amount on prosthetic masks that look as if a horse joined a glam metal rock band, these things are devoid of all humanity or reality. They also look sick as all hell when trying to burst through a window like a full-moon xenomorph.
7. Underworld: Evolution (2006)
If we’re being honest, the Underworld movies haven’t aged great. Definite products of a mid-2000s, post-Matrix and concurrent nu-metal leather aesthetic, they’re a ridiculous product of their time—although one with a bemusing sense of commitment to them, with the casts being littered with Shakespearean thespians spouting pseudo-Shakespearean nonsense. And the early installments at least remembered their first and most important edict: it must all look kewl!
The werewolf designs in the original Underworld by Patrick Tatopoulos are the more original, with these lycans (and henceforth only “lycans” since someone at Screen Gems apparently deemed the term “werewolf” to be goofy) looking closer to hairless cats than canines. But it’s in the sequel film Evolution that we get the best of both worlds. The main lycan in question, a tundra-hued polar bear of a menace named William, is nothing short of fantastic in appearance. In the same era as Van Helsing and Twilight’s all-CGI werewolves, here was a throwback to ‘80s prosthetic mastery; a beast purely defined by wolfish features that can switch between two and four legs depending on the situation. If only the rest of the movie could’ve been just lycan this.
6. The Company of Wolves (1984)
Admittedly this one is another bit of a cheat where we’re ranking for the extended, mid-transformation appearance more than the final shape, which in this Neil Jordan cult classic essentially becomes just a gray wolf. Nevertheless, entire scenes are played out before that moment, particularly near the end with Micha Bergese’s worldly French traveler revealing what big, lustful eyes he really has for Sarah Patterson’s young Rosaleen and her little red-riding hood.
All unsubtle Freudian metaphor for the dangers of dawning desire, particularly for young women raised in a patriarchal society, there’s something simple but psychologically profound about the werwolf in this film being a bare-chested predator with long hair, preternaturally luminous eyes, and very, very big teeth. It might not win an Fangoria award, but it is perhaps the most threatening silhouette on this entire list.
5. The Wolfman (2010)
Rick Baker might just be the Michelangelo of werewolves. He certainly designed the definitive transformation for one in the unforgettable An American Werwolf in London. He also riffed on his idol Jack Pierce’s “Elvis Werewolf” design when he lightly turned Jack Nicholson into a furry via Wolf (1994). Baker even gave us Michael Jackson’s were-cat in the “Thriller” music video! But it was right before retirement that he returned one more time to the screen for the most pure tribute to Pierce in his career, The Wolfman (2010).
A flawed but, we’d argue, fascinating movie, this troubled production featured an absolute flawless throwback to early and mid-20th century werewolf movies when Baker turned Benicio del Toro into an even hairier monster prowling the streets of Victorian London. It is probably the most sophisticated iteration of the classic movie monster silhouette. The claws are longer, the fangs scarier, and the clothes far more ripped and bloodied. Yet it is perhaps so well-done—and also so clearly a mask near the end when del Toro needs to emote more than pure rage while circling Emily Blunt—that we keep it a little lower than its paterfamilias namesake.
4. Ginger Snaps (2000)
Curiously there are not a lot of female werewolves in fiction. Be it movies, TV shows, or books, even subcultures of lycanthropes are typically depicted by male-dominated demographics. Think Twilight, Underworld, Van Helsing. That makes Ginger Snaps doubly special considering it not only centers on a she-wolf of the Great White, Canadian North, but it uses the concept as a coming-of-age allegory for young women in general and those who might identify as queer or LGBTQ+ in particular.
It is probably for that reason the designs in Ginger Snaps are so outside-the-box. We admit we’re ranking more for the mid-metamorphosis appearance of Ginger Fitzgerald (Katharine Isabelle), who spends most of the film becoming her bloody best self after being mauled by a werewolf that scented out her first menstrual cycle. Midway through the film, Ginger embraces her bad self with a monstrous face and ghostly white-streaked hair cascading in waves down her face. Later on, she is replaced by a full bear-sized quadruped which also is pretty damn nifty as well as it tries to spread the liberation.
3. An American Werewolf in London (1981)
If we were ranking werewolf transformations, this would be number one with a bullet, silver or otherwise. In fact, it is! But if we are ranking purely based on the scientific metric of “what looks coolest,” we suppose we have a bit of a bias for bipedal beasties, as we’ll get to in a moment. Nevertheless, there is no denying that Rick Baker and John Landis’ vision for a four-legged “hound from hell!” is the definitive rendition of a quadruped werewolf.
Entirely the creation of animatronics and creature-shop design in his final form, this culmination of David Kessler’s carnivorous lunar activities is a tour de force in the golden age of horror movie special effects—as well as the first film to win a competitive Oscar for makeup, albeit more so for the aforementioned transformation sequence. Once David (who is played by David Naughton) is fully wolfed out though, his eyes glow with yellow anger, a single fang is big enough to crush an entire jugular, and the way the creature is only teased while stalking down a tube station at midnight is the stuff of nightmares. By the time he is turning Piccadilly Circus into a slaughterhouse, we view the creature in all its glory. And you know what? It still holds up.
2. The Howling (1981)
Here is what I’m sure is a controversial take. While An American Werwolf in London is the winner in terms of transformation sequences and arguably quality between 1981’s two seminal lycanthrope flicks (or three if you count Wolfen), Joe Dante’s The Howling is still a hair-raising triumph. And… if we’re being honest… the werewolves are kinda cooler looking.
That might be sacrilege around some parts, but Rick Baker’s protege Rob Bottin did a phenomenal job in his own right staging the second best transformation sequence in cinema history. Also by nature of Dante going for bipedal werewolves, Dante/Bottin’s have a more classical appearance, even deliberately evoking the Walt Disney design of the Big Bad Wolf from 1933’s “Three Little Pigs” short, which Dante uncomfortably makes explicit by intercutting the cartoon with a sequence of his own Big Bad Wolf brutally murdering the film’s most proactive character. Furthermore, we get two radically different werewolf designs for the price as one when Dee Wallace’s heroine also transforms in the movie’s final scene into the most teary-eyed tragic riff on the famed Jack Pierce Wolf Man design out there. Speaking of which….
1. The Wolf Man (1941)
This will undoubtedly earn ire from some corners, but sometimes it’s a classic for a reason. Jack Pierce’s legendary application of yak hair to Lon Chaney Jr.’s face, hands, and feet is not the scariest werewolf we’ve ever seen, nor the most ferocious. But for the better part of a half century, it was the yardstick they were all measured against. From Oliver Reed to Michael Landon in I Was a Teenage Werewolf (1956), to the entire cottage industry Paul Naschy created in Spanish Wolf Man knockoffs, this was the gold standard.
So when it comes to spooky season, there remains little as charming or seasonally appropriate as the shots of Chaney in his full furry regalia, stomping through fog-choked soundstages and their spray painted trees, looking for a throat to rip. By maintaining Chaney’s physical form, eyes, and even his clothes, we see both the actor’s humanity, as well as the tangible rage only someone familiar with losing himself to demons can conjure. There’s a devilish sense of fun to this werewolf, as well as a crueler energy, both pitiable and perilous. Nearly 90 years later it still shapes how we hear the call of the moon.
The 10 Best ‘80s Action Movies
Everything was bigger in the 1980s. Chalk it up to an economic boom in the U.S., to reactionary turns under the Reagan and Thatcher administrations, to the slick wheeling and dealing of super producers Don Simpson and Jerry Bruckheimer. Whatever the reasons, moviegoers wanted to see big guns, big muscles, and bigger explosions on the big screen, and action movies were happy to deliver.
Even better, action movies delivered that mayhem at a level of excellence and consistency we have not seen since the end of the decade. Which means that it’s going to be a knock-down, drag-out fight to try to limit ourselves to 10 ten best action movies of the ‘80s. We’re going to include movies that are great by any standard alongside movies that are really great at blowing stuff up. And if we miss a few of your favorites, well, feel free to keep the explosions going in the comment section. Just make sure you drop a stone-cold one-liner when you shoot us down.
Mad Max 2/The Road Warrior (1981)
As this list will show, things get big and bloated as the 1980s go on. But the first movie on this list is lean and mean and all the better for it. The success of 1979’s Mad Max gave director George Miller, working with co-writers Terry Hayes and Brian Hannant, means to certainly expand on the post-apocalyptic world for his sequel. Yet, even as Mad Max 2 takes the characters fully into a wasteland only hinted at in its predecessor, it still retains the restraint that made the first movie so striking.
The Road Warrior (as it was called in the U.S., to avoid confusing viewers who didn’t see its predecessor) finds former cop Max Rockatansky (Mel Gibson) wandering the desert, having lost not just his wife and child, but all of civilization. Along with the odd Gyro Captain (Bruce Spence), Max befriends a group of settlers, and comes to their aid when they are menaced by Lord Humungus (Kjell Nilsson), the Ayatollah of Rock and Rolla. Between its vivid characters, intense setting, and expertly-shot fight sequences, Mad Max 2 more than stands alongside its big-budget counterparts of the era.
Rambo: First Blood Part II (1985)
First Blood is one of Sylvester Stallone‘s best movies. It’s a tense thriller and a sympathetic look at a Vietnam vet who gets hassled by cops on a power trip, who don’t take kindly to a drifter in their midst. It’s a great film, but not for this list. For this list, we turn to the sequel Rambo: First Blood Part II, an inferior movie in every way, except for one: it is an incredible, unbelievable, utterly ridiculous action movie.
Where First Blood showed how war left John Rambo an empty shell of a man, with no place in civil society, First Blood Part II flushes all that away to let him win the Vietnam War for America. Upon learning of POWs still in Vietnam, Rambo suits up and goes back to fight, slaughtering all who stand in the way. Morally reprehensible and narratively implausible though it may be, First Blood manages to entertain, thanks to the tight script, credited to Stallone and James Cameron, and George P. Cosmatos maximalist direction.
Commando (1985)
By no standard is Commando the best action movie of the 1980s. But by every metric, it is the most action movie of the 1980s. The screenplay by master of the excessive form Steven E. de Souza, working on a story by Matthew Weisman and comic book scribe Jeph Loeb, is filled with all sorts of nonsense, that begins—but by no means ends—with naming Arnold Schwarzenegger‘s character John Matrix—and director Mark L. Lester brings it to life in all its absurd glory.
The movie begins with Matrix seemingly left his life of violence behind him, living in tranquility with his daughter Jenny (Alyssa Milano). But when members of his former unit start dying, and especially when Jenny gets kidnapped, Matrix must go back into action. And go into action he does, battling an entire army led by his former compatriot Bennett (Vernon Wells) and by General Arius (Dan Hedaya), the dictator of fictional Latin American country Val Verde, whom Matrix helped depose. Glorious, explosive nonsense follows.
Police Story (1985)
For Americans, no ’80s action movie list would be complete without the names Schwarzenegger and Stallone (it is complete without Norris, as you can see). But when we take the entire world into consideration, then the list must include the name Jackie Chan, easily the most exciting and innovative screen action star of the decade. And in 1985, Chan released perhaps his best movie, Police Story, a film so rich with action that one of its most jaw-dropping sequences involves the main character simply answering phone calls.
Of course, nothing is simple with Chan, a genius of the form who combined Buster Keaton style physical comedy with Bruce Lee’s big-screen prowess. Those skills are fully on display in Police Story, directed by Chan from a script he co-wrote with Edward Tang. The story of Police Story is pretty simple, as it focuses on Sergeant Chan Ka-Kui of the Royal Hong Kong Police Force breaking up the grip that master criminal Chu Tao (Chor Yuen) holds on the city, getting in trouble with his girlfriend (Maggie Cheung) and Chu Tao’s secretary (Brigitte Lin) along the way. But the basic plot leaves plenty of room for the thing we really want to see in a Jackie Chan movie: incredible stunts performed in perfect clarity by the star himself.
Aliens (1986)
In Alien, a group of working-class space-truckers found themselves outmatched by a xenomorph, a perfect organism. In Aliens, humanity fights back, thanks to the bold, brash, and unbelievably-armed space marines. Yes, they mostly die horribly, their guns unable to match the hordes of xenomorphs. But still, they look really cool doing it.
That’s the magic trick of Aliens, a film that manages to feel of a piece with Ridley Scott‘s “haunted house in space” movie while also serving as the paradigmatic action flick. James Cameron gives a masterclass in efficiently introducing colorful characters, making the various Marines who join Ellen Ripley (Sigourney Weaver) feel distinctive with just a few seconds of screen time. He then continues to create set pieces that thrill, allowing the xenomorphs to remain terrifying, even as they get chewed up by chain gun fire. Ironically, Aliens manages to increase the threat of the xenomorphs precisely because they’re fighting soldiers in an action flick.
Lethal Weapon (1987)
The buddy cop genre had existed long before the ’80s, with variations like the forerunner buddy cop movie Freebie and the Bean, the buddy criminal flick Thunderbolt and Lightfoot, and the buddy cop/criminal outing 48 Hrs. setting the stage. But Lethal Weapon brought all the pieces together, fully realizing what previous movies only hinted at.
Director Richard Donner and writer Shane Black come together to tell the story of by the book veteran officer Roger Murtaugh (Danny Glover, only 41 at the time, yet already too old for that shit), forced to team with troubled Vietnam vet Martin Riggs (Mel Gibson) to take down a drug smuggling operation based on Riggs’ former paramilitary unit. The combination of street grit and military action gives Lethal Weapon an energy all its own, one carried along by the rat-a-tat banter of the two leads, just as propulsive as any machine gun fire.
Predator (1987)
By now, pairing xenomorphs and Predators has become a tired and obvious trope. But back in 1987, the first Predator movie set the stage by taking the model Cameron set in his film and amping it up to 1000. The first half of Predator takes the introduction of the Space Marines in Aliens and expands it to a glorious symphony of violence, as a special forces team led by musclemen Dutch (Schwarzenegger) and Dillon (Carl Weathers) lays waste to Latin American rebels and an entire jungle.
From there, however, director John McTiernan, working from a script by Jim Thomas and John Thomas, shifts gears, turning toward sci-fi horror. The mighty American military men find themselves under attack by what we now know today as a Yautja, an alien hunter who challenges itself against the strongest opponents. The conceit allows Predator to play like the ultimate action movie, making its big, buff heroes so imposing that they draw challengers from the stars.
Robocop (1987)
Like Aliens and Predator, Robocop mixes science fiction into the action movie mix. But unlike those movies, it has a satirical edge that adds depth to the mayhem, even as it critiques it. The first Hollywood movie from Dutch provocateur Paul Verhoeven, working from a script by Edward Neumeier and Michael Miner, Robocop is both a satisfying action movie about police officer who becomes a literal crime-fighting machine and an indictment of America’s love for retributive violence.
Set in the near future, Robocop stars Peter Weller as Alex Murphy, a good cop and family man who gets transferred from his relatively quiet precinct to the apocalyptic Old Detroit. After being slaughtered by gangster Clarence Boddicker (Kurtwood Smith), Murphy gets repurposed into Robocop, a tool of unethical company OCP masquerading as a powerful force for good. Verhoeven has no use for subtlety, making Robocop’s attacks on corporate America and our lust for violence clear. But Verhoeven also knows how to shoot a memorable action scene, making Robocop an entertaining lecture.
Bloodsport (1988)
With yet another Street Fighter movie failing to live up to expectations, the 1988 Cannon release Bloodsport looks better every year. Bloodsport may star Jean-Claude Van Damme, the most physically adept but dramatically inert of the ’80s action heroes; it may draw inspiration from a totally made-up event concocted by fabulist Frank Dux; and it may be nothing more than a series of one-on-one fight scenes cobbled together – but Bloodsport manages to be pure entertainment, something no other tournament movie seems to get right.
Directed by Newt Arnold and written by Christopher Cosby, Mel Friedman, and Sheldon Lettich, Bloodsport follows Dux (Van Damme) as he participates in the underground fighting tournament Kumite. In between the bouts, Dux encounters reporters and government operatives, and befriends a galoot of an American wrestler (Donald Gibb), all building to a showdown with the deadly Chong Li (Bolo Yeung). Bloodsport isn’t deep or complex, but apparently its clean and entertaining model is almost impossible to emulate.
Die Hard (1988)
Nearly every other movie on this list features a musclebound hero, someone so built and ripped that we immediately clock them as the person who will still be standing at the end. That alone was enough to make Bruce Willis‘ take on New York cop John McClane surprising, even if modern viewers don’t know him mostly as a comedy star, as Die Hard‘s first audiences did. Director John McTiernan, working from a script by Jeb Stuart and Steven E. de Souza, turned Willis’ unlikely status into the movie’s greatest strength, making it an action movie about one normal guy’s very bad day.
As every obnoxious uncle can tell you, Die Hard is a Christmas movie about McClane flying to Nakatomi Plaza in Los Angeles in the hopes of reconciling with his estranged wife (Bonnie Bedelia) over the holidays. His plans run into a snag when a group of baddies, led by the magnetic Hans Gruber (Alan Rickman) lay siege on the plaza, for reasons not initially apparent. From those impossible odds, McClane must battle his way through, stymied by everything from broken glass to cynical federal agents. All the way to the end, we doubt Willis in a way that we’d never doubt Arnold or Sly, making Die Hard among the most thrilling action movies of all time.
Star Trek: Celebrating the Scene-Chewing Genius of William Shatner
At the end of Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan, Admiral James T. Kirk stands before the crew of the USS Enterprise to offer some words of solace on a heartbreaking occasion. Their friend, colleague, and commanding officer Spock has died, sacrificing himself to save them all. Kirk in particular has lost the person who understood him best, and fans of the franchise have lost their favorite character.
“Of all the souls I have encountered in my travels,” begins the Captain. “His was the most… human.” Kirk’s words are fitting, even the fact that he identifies the half-Vulcan as fully human, a designation the living Spock would have rejected. But its not the words that really stand out. It’s the way that William Shatner delivers those words, the preposterous pregnant pause he holds right before spitting the word “human,” the way he twists his face in anguish.
For years, moments such as these made Shatner’s acting an object of ridicule. But it’s high time that we recognize them as what they are: excellent melodramatic acting.
A Laughed-At Legend
It’s hard to say where Shatner’s reputation went sour. Certainly, people noticed and mimicked his off-beat cadences early on. See, for example, the way John Belushi milked the pauses when playing Kirk on a sketch in a 1976 episode of Saturday Night Live. Even Shatner himself seemed to play it up on various chat show appearances. But all of these seemed like extensions of the show itself, Star Trek’s tendency to prattle on about weird alien names or borrow from Shakespeare for titles such as “Dagger of the Mind.”
Yet, for those who grew up in the era of The Next Generation, Shatner seemed like the old buffoon we had to put up with before we got to the good stuff. Shatner would go on Conan and sing/talk “Common People,” or he’d show up in a spoof of Seven on the MTV Movie Awards. But surely he didn’t deserve to be taken as seriously as Jean-Luc Picard, played by properly serious dramatic actor Patrick Stewart?
Perhaps it was all of those goofy roles that diminished Shatner’s reputation. Perhaps it was his turn as the title cop in the ‘80s series TJ Hooker that did him in. Where Star Trek let Shatner monologue about humanity’s better nature and the joys of discovery, TJ Hooker asks Shatner to deliver diatribes about permissiveness corrupting society, and how the police should be given free reign to crack down on degenerates. On TJ Hooker, Shatner’s speeches felt like the boasts of a blowhard right wing talk show host, hardly engendering the same sympathies as the intrepid captain.
And so, Shatner became a joke, even among Trekkies. That is, until Kirk finally shared the screen with our beloved Captain Picard. And then, the magic of Shatner’s style could no longer be denied.
Generational Talent
Star Trek: Generations is a terrible movie. It somehow botches the lay-up of getting Malcolm McDowell to play a fanatical villain, it turns the explicitly kid-avoidant Picard into someone who longs for a Victorian family, and it lets Kirk die on a rusty bridge. It doesn’t even do justice to the central hook, teaming Kirk and Picard on an adventure.
But Generations does do exactly one thing correct: it gets out of the way and lets Shatner do his stuff.
For those who have forgotten, Star Trek: Generations involves an anomaly called the Nexus, which traps whoever enters it, but fills them with bliss. The Nexus destroys the Enterprise-B, under the command of hapless Captain Harriman (Alan Ruck), and seemingly kills Kirk in the past. But when Picard encounters the Nexus in his present, he finds Kirk apparently living out his dream, on a ranch with horses and an off-screen wife.
The story asks Picard to convince a seemingly contented Kirk to return to action and stop the villain Soran. Picard does so by using what we’ve come to know as his greatest skill, his gift of argument and oration. Yet, in the actual conflict between the two, Picard comes off stiff and uncomfortable, while Kirk seems sprightly and excited, full of life.
Take one of their first exchanges, when Picard enters Kirk’s homestead and tries to explain that he’s the captain of the future Enterprise. Stewart stumbles over his words, talking slowly in the fear that his revelations will startle his predecessor. At the same time, Shatner bounces around the room, with Kirk paying little mind to his visitor and instead taking stock of the items around him. Kirk stops when he finds a clock and realizes it was once a gift to Doctor McCoy. Shatner, of course, pauses as he delivers the line, holding his face stone still to register the shock. When Kirk snaps out of it, Shatner speaks the next lines in a rush, as if he can’t get them out quickly enough.
Were an impressionist on SNL to speak the lines in the same way, they would sound silly and ill-chosen. But in the moment that Shatner says them, they feel perfect. He knows that the occasion calls for pomp and circumstance, and he meets that moment. The meeting of two legends should be a big deal, it deserves awe and playfulness and even sanctimony—not whatever Stewart is doing.
Shatner delivers, over-delivers, the emotion the scene requires, and he does it well, because he’s been answering the call as Kirk for decades.
Boldly Going Where No Actor Has Gone Before
Part of Star Trek’s longevity owes to the fact that it covers so many tones and genres. Yes, it is absolutely an inspiring, utopian show about how humanity gets better over time and improves to explore space. It’s an adventure show that features humans punching aliens in the face, and it’s a philosophical show that sees those same humans sitting down with aliens to talk through their differences. It’s a serious show with pretentious titles, and it’s a silly show that has its doctor chase around a white rabbit to find a pair of girls in bikinis.
In short, Star Trek involves big feelings and big thoughts, and, as such, it calls for big performances. No one has answered that call as deftly and consistently as William Shatner. Laugh if you want, do goofy impressions if you want. But of all the actors in the absurd, far-out world of Star Trek, William Shatner is undoubtedly the most human.