The Best Versions Of Spider-Man

If we’re talking about who’s the best Spider-Man, then the original Peter Parker has no competition. There’s a reason why nearly every adaptation focuses on him, with only a handful changing the character either completely or with a few alterations. But the multiverse has more Spider heroes to offer.

What we have today are the best Spider-Man variants that do something different with the formula, either perfecting it, flipping it on its head, or straight up ignoring it. While 616 Peter will forever exist in our hearts, there is also room for some wackier versions of the character as well.

IMDb

Ultimate Spider-Man (Earth-1610)

The original Ultimate Spider-Man reimagined Peter Parker for a new generation without losing what made him relatable. Brian Michael Bendis’ long-running version remains one of the most beloved alternate takes on the character.

IMDb

Spider-Man 2099

Miguel O’Hara brought a darker, more futuristic edge to Spider-Man. His high-tech suit, tragic backstory, and willingness to bend Peter Parker’s moral code made him an instant fan favorite.

IMDb

Ben Reilly

As the Scarlet Spider and later Spider-Man himself, Ben Reilly gave fans another Peter Parker with his own personality and struggles. His redemption arc has only become more appreciated over time.

marvel.fandom.com

Spiders-Man

One of Marvel’s strangest Spider-variants, Spiders-Man is literally a colony of radioactive spiders that consumed Peter Parker and now believe they are him. It’s bizarre, unsettling, and surprisingly memorable.

IMDb

Mayday Parker

Peter Parker’s daughter inherited both his powers and his sense of responsibility. As Spider-Girl, Mayday became one of Marvel’s most successful legacy heroes, earning a devoted fanbase through her long-running series.

marvel.fandom.com

Assassin Spider-Man

This darker Peter Parker abandoned his usual no-killing rule after being recruited into a multiversal strike force. Seeing Spider-Man embrace lethal methods made this version stand out among countless alternate realities.

marvel.fandom.com

Spider-UK

Billy Braddock’s Spider-UK combines Spider-Man’s powers with Captain Britain’s leadership qualities. He became one of the key organizers during Spider-Verse, helping unite dozens of Spider-heroes against overwhelming odds.

IMDb

Miles Morales

Miles Morales successfully accomplished what many thought impossible: becoming a second Spider-Man without replacing Peter Parker. His personality, powers, and stories have made him one of Marvel’s biggest modern successes.

IMDb

Pavitr Prabhakar

The Indian Spider-Man adapts Peter Parker’s origin to Mumbai while creating a unique cultural identity. His popularity exploded after Across the Spider-Verse introduced him to a much wider audience.

IMDb

Superior Spider-Man

When Doctor Octopus took over Peter Parker’s body, he genuinely tried to become a better Spider-Man. His ruthless efficiency and eventual growth created one of Marvel’s most compelling modern storylines.

IMDb

Spider-Gwen

Gwen Stacy’s reinvention as Ghost-Spider quickly became more than a clever alternate-universe concept. Her distinctive costume, emotional stories, and unique supporting cast turned her into one of Marvel’s breakout characters.

IMDb

Spider-Man Noir

Set in the Great Depression, Spider-Man Noir trades bright colors for trench coats, revolvers, and hard-boiled detective stories. His pulp-inspired world gives Spider-Man one of his most distinctive alternate identities.

IMDb

Spider-Punk

Hobie Brown fights oppression with electric guitars, punk rock, and complete disregard for authority. His rebellious attitude and unforgettable design helped turn a once-obscure variant into one of Marvel’s most popular Spider-People.

14 Actors Who Spent Entire Movies Looking Confused

Most actors have range beyond a single emotion, something we’ve seen time and time again as they perform. However, some movies don’t require more than one: an everpresent state of confusion. This can work for a while in movies with complex moving parts, but even then, you’d expect them to eventually get used to their situation.

Either due to a directorial mandate or lack thereof, these actors went through their movies with one face: bewilderment due to their non understanding. It’s amusing once you notice it, particularly for characters famed for being problem solvers.

IMDb

Keanu Reeves

In Bram Stoker’s Dracula, Keanu Reeves spends much of the film reacting to increasingly bizarre events with a perpetually bewildered expression. His confused demeanor has become almost as memorable as his much-discussed accent.

IMDb

Tom Cruise

Eyes Wide Shut follows Tom Cruise from one strange encounter to another. Nearly every scene leaves his character looking increasingly confused as he wanders through a mystery that never fully explains itself.

IMDb

Jesse Eisenberg

As Columbus in Zombieland, Jesse Eisenberg spends most of the movie looking like he can’t believe what’s happening. His constant uncertainty perfectly complements the film’s mix of horror and comedy.

IMDb

Chris Pratt

Peter Quill enters Guardians of the Galaxy believing he’s an ordinary outlaw. By the end, he’s encountered talking raccoons, living trees, and cosmic artifacts, spending much of the adventure visibly bewildered.

IMDb

Brendan Fraser

The Mummy repeatedly throws Brendan Fraser’s Rick O’Connell into supernatural chaos. Between resurrected priests and ancient curses, he often reacts with the expression of someone improvising every second.

IMDb

Martin Freeman

Bilbo Baggins spends much of The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey wondering how his quiet life turned into a quest involving trolls, goblins, and dragons. Martin Freeman’s baffled reactions sell every absurd situation.

IMDb

Will Smith

In Men in Black, Will Smith’s Agent J discovers that aliens have been hiding in plain sight all along. His constant disbelief provides many of the film’s funniest moments.

IMDb

Jeff Bridges

The Dude in The Big Lebowski rarely understands why events keep spiraling out of control. Jeff Bridges spends much of the film looking pleasantly confused as increasingly bizarre people enter his life.

IMDb

Sam Neill

Few actors have looked more genuinely overwhelmed than Sam Neill in Jurassic Park. From seeing living dinosaurs to surviving a T-Rex attack, his stunned expressions mirror the audience’s own amazement.

IMDb

Daniel Radcliffe

Harry Potter spends much of the early films reacting to magical revelations with wide-eyed confusion. Daniel Radcliffe expertly portrays someone constantly discovering that the wizarding world is even stranger than he imagined.

IMDb

Michael J. Fox

Marty McFly barely has time to process one problem before another appears in Back to the Future. Michael J. Fox spends nearly the entire movie trying to understand increasingly impossible circumstances.

IMDb

Kyle MacLachlan

In Dune (1984), Kyle MacLachlan’s Paul Atreides is bombarded with prophecies, political conspiracies, and mystical visions. Much of the film finds him looking understandably uncertain about his destiny.

IMDb

Ryan Gosling

As Officer K in Blade Runner 2049, Ryan Gosling quietly pieces together a mystery that continually upends everything he believes. His restrained, confused reactions fit the film’s existential tone perfectly.

IMDb

Edward Norton

Before the truth becomes clear in Fight Club, Edward Norton spends much of the film looking exhausted, uncertain, and increasingly confused by the strange events unfolding around him.

14 Obvious Movie ‘Twists’ Everyone Saw Coming

Who doesn’t enjoy a good plot twist? You’re enjoying a movie, following the story closely, when all of a sudden everything gets turned on its head. Looking back, you can see the seeds of what’s going on, but you know that you could’ve never guessed it.

Now, a bad plot twist is one you see from a mile away. Sometimes you have the hope that, since it’s so obvious, the twist will be something else. But no, it’s just a bad script on a poorly made plot. These are the most obvious plot twists we’ve found, so we’re not that sorry to spoil most of them.

IMDb

Thanksgiving

Eli Roth sprinkles clues almost immediately, beginning with the opening sequence. By the halfway point, many viewers had already narrowed down the killer, making the eventual reveal feel more like confirmation than a genuine surprise.

IMDb

Spiral

Marketed as a fresh take on the Saw formula, Spiral telegraphs its central reveal early. Genre fans quickly suspected the true mastermind, leaving the final act with far less impact than intended.

IMDb

Alien: Covenant

The moment Walter and David disappear together, many viewers expected a switch. The reveal that David had replaced Walter plays out dramatically, but countless fans saw it coming long before the finale.

IMDb

Ghost Ship

Ferriman is mysterious, always appears at convenient moments, and even has an ominous name. It doesn’t take long for audiences to suspect he isn’t an ordinary salvager, making the supernatural reveal fairly predictable.

IMDb

MaXXXine

The mystery surrounding the killer generates suspense, but many horror fans identified the likely culprit early. The film succeeds more through style and performances than through keeping its central reveal secret.

IMDb

Intruder

Slasher fans often point out that simply studying the film’s promotional artwork gives away the killer. Once that clue is noticed, the mystery becomes far easier to solve before the ending.

IMDb

The Prowler

Despite some memorable kill scenes, The Prowler doesn’t hide its mystery especially well. Many viewers correctly identify the killer after only the opening stretch of the movie.

IMDb

Scream 4

Longtime Scream fans were already looking for the least obvious suspect, making Emma Roberts’ Jill an early favorite. Her motive is memorable, but her identity surprised fewer viewers than intended.

IMDb

Prometheus

Charlize Theron’s Vickers behaves less like a corporate executive and more like someone with a personal stake in Weyland’s mission. Her eventual connection to Peter Weyland felt obvious to many audiences.

IMDb

Reindeer Games

Charlize Theron’s character appears almost too perfect from the beginning. Thriller fans quickly suspected she was manipulating Ben Affleck’s character, making her betrayal one of the film’s least shocking moments.

IMDb

Incredibles 2

Evelyn Deavor’s name alone raises eyebrows, and her constant criticism of superheroes points suspicion in her direction. Many viewers guessed she was the Screenslaver long before the official reveal.

IMDb

The Forgotten

The film spends so much time insisting everything has a rational explanation that many viewers immediately suspected something far stranger. When aliens finally enter the story, the twist felt surprisingly unsurprising.

IMDb

Saltburn

The closing montage spells out Oliver’s manipulations in detail, but many audiences had already pieced together his schemes. Instead of revealing new information, it mostly confirms what attentive viewers already believed.

IMDb

Smile 2

Even before release, trailers led many horror fans to predict exactly where the sequel’s curse would end up. The marketing unintentionally made the movie’s final direction easier to anticipate than expected.

15 of Our Fittest Celebrities

Often, celebrities need to stay in shape because a given role demands it. That is not the life for all of them, however, since some of them want to stay in shape at all times. They include marathon runners and triathletes, martial artists and even endurance athletes; these stars have proven their dedication extends well beyond a movie set or concert stage.

Many have completed major races, embraced demanding training regimens, or spent decades mastering physically challenging disciplines. Their commitment isn’t about looking good on screen, rather about discipline, consistency, and pushing personal limits. These celebrities have earned reputations as some of the fittest and most athletic figures in entertainment.

IMDb

Terry Crews

Before becoming an actor, Terry Crews played in the NFL. He still maintains an intense workout routine focused on strength training and has become one of Hollywood’s most recognizable advocates for lifelong fitness.

IMDb

Jennifer Connelly

Jennifer Connelly is an accomplished distance runner who has completed the New York City Marathon multiple times. She has spoken about running as both a physical challenge and a way to clear her mind.

IMDb

Ryan Reynolds

Ryan Reynolds has transformed his physique repeatedly for action roles like Deadpool. His long-term commitment to strength training and conditioning has made fitness a consistent part of his career.

IMDb

Gordon Ramsay

The celebrity chef is also a dedicated endurance athlete. Gordon Ramsay has completed numerous marathons, Ironman triathlons, and other demanding races, often sharing his training progress with fans.

IMDb

Ellie Goulding

Singer Ellie Goulding is passionate about running and endurance sports. She has completed multiple half marathons and regularly discusses how fitness plays a major role in her mental and physical well-being.

IMDb

Mark Wahlberg

Known for his famously disciplined daily routine, Mark Wahlberg trains year-round with a combination of weightlifting and cardio. His commitment to fitness has remained consistent throughout decades in Hollywood.

IMDb

Zac Efron

Zac Efron embraced demanding workout programs for films like Baywatch and has maintained an active lifestyle involving hiking, climbing, swimming, and outdoor adventure sports beyond movie roles.

IMDb

Hugh Jackman

Preparing to play Wolverine required years of strength training and disciplined nutrition. Even between superhero films, Hugh Jackman has continued lifting weights and maintaining an impressively athletic lifestyle.

IMDb

David Goggins

Although better known today as an author and motivational speaker, David Goggins has appeared in films and television. His resume includes ultramarathons, Ironman triathlons, and some of the toughest endurance races on Earth.

IMDb

Natalie Dormer

Natalie Dormer completed the London Marathon in an impressive time while raising money for charity. She has consistently emphasized running as an important part of her overall fitness routine.

IMDb

Jason Statham

Before acting, Jason Statham competed nationally in diving for England. His background in athletics, combined with martial arts and functional strength training, helps him perform many of his own action sequences.

IMDb

Matthew McConaughey

Matthew McConaughey is an avid runner who has completed major road races and frequently trains outdoors. His lean physique has long reflected a lifestyle built around consistent physical activity.

IMDb

Joe Manganiello

Joe Manganiello’s muscular build comes from years of disciplined resistance training and careful nutrition. He has openly discussed treating fitness as a long-term commitment rather than something reserved for film roles.

IMDb

Chris Hemsworth

Chris Hemsworth has built his career around athletic roles, but fitness remains a priority off camera as well. He regularly trains with functional workouts, surfing, boxing, and high-intensity conditioning, even launching his own fitness platform.

IMDb

Cameron Diaz

Cameron Diaz has long been known for her commitment to an active lifestyle. She has completed the New York City Marathon and has frequently spoken about strength training, nutrition, and exercise as lifelong habits rather than temporary goals.

15 Vintage Photos of Gaming in the ’70s & ’80s

Video games have been around for quite a while, and it’s always a good time remembering the roots of it all. Mostly because, for most of us, the golden era of gaming is behind us. We might envy the children that grow up with today’s gaming scene, but we aren’t kids anymore.

For those of us that can still enjoy gaming, it’s still a warm feeling to remember the good old days. Back then, the sky was the limit, a few pixels represented eternity and you got what you paid for. These pictures represent a trip down memory lane, with all its ups and downs.

r/OldSchoolCool

Indie Developers

Gaming was for everyone, even back in the 70s. Here, we see soon-to-be engineers preparing to finish their final senior project, their very own video game.

r/OldSchoolCool

Ads In Comic Books

The comic book and video game scenes are somewhat related today, at least in terms of audience overlap, but back then it was even more so. Here, we see an ad for a video game on the back of a, you guessed it, comic book page.

r/OldSchoolCool

Video Game Wonder

The children born in the back end of the 80s were the first generation that grew up with video games. Of course, that wasn’t the case for the whole population, but like this picture shows, it was the case for some of us.

r/OldSchoolCool

Steven And E.T.

You might not know the legend, but the E.T. video game is considered by most the worst game ever made. That makes this image of Spielberg testing the game with awe on his face a little bit sad.

r/OldSchoolCool

The Video Game Store

Nowadays, the video game store is slowly dying in favor of purely digital purchases, but here we can see the craft on its first legs. Of course, before having dedicated stores, games were sold alongside other products, like at a cafe in this case.

r/OldSchoolCool

Test Your Future Games

A very common practice in video game stores was letting customers try out the games, like what we today know as a demo. Some people used these opportunities to beat entire games in one sitting, something frowned upon by the store owners.

r/OldSchoolCool

Space Invaders Competition

Unlike other, more casual competitions, the ones held for Space Invaders in the early 80s were quite organized, with devices made specially for the event. Since PvP wasn’t really a thing, players competed for the highest score.

r/OldSchoolCool

Trying The Atari Controller

As we know, adults were into video games just as much as children, and with home consoles, they were the ones that needed to know how the system worked. A small child wasn’t going to fix the console if something broke, after all.

r/OldSchoolCool

Perfect Distraction Tool

I think we can all agree that having a waiting area at the dentist, one filled with toys and video games, would make going there less of a hassle. This doctor was ahead of its time.

r/OldSchoolCool

Mystery Game

Here, we can see a bunch of kids hunched over a computer with excited poses. Now, we don’t know what they’re watching, but we doubt that’s homework; they’re more likely playing some new videogame at someone’s house.

r/OldSchoolCool

Waiting Game

The dentist wasn’t alone in modernizing the way we wait for things, since the Powell Street BART Station added Atari consoles for people waiting for their trains. We can only imagine the number of trains lost due to people having a bit too much fun.

r/OldSchoolCool

Console Wars

You might think that the console wars were always between Sony, Microsoft and Nintendo, but these companies weren’t reality a thing the further back you go. The original console wars were between the Coleco Vision, Intellivision and Atari.

r/OldSchoolCool

The Tech Store

The one place where you can still see physical video games being sold is at department stores around the world. The things on offer today may be different, but visually, little has changed at these places.

r/OldSchoolCool

The One That Started It All

No vintage video game list is complete without mentioning the progenitor of the medium, Pong. Here, we see some kids enjoying an afternoon of gaming, bouncing that ball around like their lives depended on it.

r/OldSchoolCool

First Spinach, Then Video Games

As we all know, the concept of Popeye was conceived so kids in America would eat more vegetables, spinach in particular. Well, Popeye did such a good job at that, that he was then used to sell other things like video games. Sadly, to lesser results.

15 Embarrassing Moments in Otherwise Great Movies

We can excuse some ‘bad’ moments in movies we love, because the overall message is there for us to enjoy. Particularly on first time viewings, we can excuse almost anything. The problem comes when we rewatch these films knowing how it ends, the surprise gone, we are now left looking at the smallest details.

And those details, for some, can ruin great movies. Fans of such productions often overlook these moments, use them for bathroom breaks, or scroll on their phones until they are over. Here we will point them out not only for true fans, but for those who are thinking of watching these films and need a fair warning.

IMDb

The Secret Life of Walter Mitty – The Benjamin Button Joke

Most of Walter Mitty balances heartfelt adventure and self-discovery remarkably well. That’s why the brief Benjamin Button parody feels so strange. The gag lands with a thud and clashes with the movie’s otherwise sincere tone.

IMDb

The Godfather – Sonny’s Fake Punches

The tollbooth sequence is legendary, but Sonny Corleone’s earlier street beating has aged less gracefully. James Caan’s punches often miss by a noticeable margin, making an otherwise intense scene look surprisingly stagey.

IMDb

Edge of Tomorrow – Dr. Carter’s Reaction

The film moves at a relentless pace, making Dr. Carter’s extended look of confusion stand out. The reaction lingers just long enough to feel exaggerated in a movie that usually keeps things tight.

IMDb

Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part 2 – The Final Duel

After years of buildup, many fans expected something more satisfying than Harry and Voldemort flying around ruins together. The movie abandons the book’s public confrontation for a visually busy but less impactful showdown.

IMDb

Breakfast at Tiffany’s – Mr. Yunioshi

Few aspects of a classic film have aged worse. Mickey Rooney’s broad caricature is so distracting that it pulls viewers completely out of a movie that otherwise remains charming and influential.

IMDb

Monty Python and the Holy Grail – The Abrupt Ending

The film is packed with brilliant sketches, but the police suddenly arriving to stop the quest has always divided audiences. Some find it hilarious, while others see it as an intentionally unsatisfying punchline.

IMDb

Django Unchained – Tarantino’s Accent

Quentin Tarantino’s cameo is brief, but his attempt at an Australian accent is memorable for all the wrong reasons. It momentarily breaks the immersion in a movie filled with otherwise excellent performances.

IMDb

Psycho – The Psychiatrist Explanation

The mystery has already been solved visually by the time the psychiatrist begins explaining everything. Many viewers feel the lengthy exposition spells out details the audience had already figured out.

IMDb

Apocalypse Now Redux – The Plantation Sequence

The original theatrical cut moves with a dreamlike momentum. The restored plantation sequence is fascinating historically, but many viewers feel it interrupts the film’s descent into madness rather than enhancing it.

IMDb

The Godfather Part III – Mary’s Breakdown

Sophia Coppola’s performance has long been a target for criticism. Her emotional scenes, particularly moments of distress, stand out awkwardly in a film populated by some of the strongest actors in cinema.

IMDb

The Boondock Saints – The Psychic Twin Moment

For most of its runtime, the movie stays grounded in stylized crime action. Then the brothers suddenly share a strange synchronized awakening that feels almost supernatural and is never really explained afterward.

IMDb

When Harry Met Sally – The Deli Scene

The famous ‘faking it’ scene is iconic, but some viewers argue it doesn’t quite fit Sally’s established personality. Its popularity has largely overshadowed questions about whether the moment feels earned.

IMDb

Arrival – The Mandarin Conversation

Arrival is celebrated for its intelligent approach to language, making one detail especially noticeable to Mandarin speakers. Amy Adams’ pronunciation during the phone call scene has often been criticized as unconvincing.

IMDb

The Dark Knight – Harvey Dent in Court

Harvey Dent disarming a gunman with a quick swipe is already a stretch. The courtroom’s applause afterward pushes the scene into territory that feels oddly theatrical compared to the movie’s grounded tone.

IMDb

The Addams Family – The Tornado Finale

Most of the film thrives on witty dialogue and eccentric characters. The climactic storm and large-scale chaos feel like a studio-mandated attempt to create spectacle in a movie that hardly needed it.

Voicemails for Isabelle is a Love Letter to Healing from Grief

This article contains some spoilers for the Netflix film Voicemails for Isabelle.

You’re proof that sometimes life rigs things in our favor. In a movie that encapsulates the sometimes silly messiness of grief and the warmth of loving through healing, Netflix’s Voicemails for Isabella is a refreshing, poignant reminder to keep living. 

Zoey Deutch stars as Jill, currently a prep cook in San Francisco who aspires to be a baker. As she navigates her life’s challenges, she shares them through a series of phone calls and voicemails with her sister, Isabelle (Ciara Bravo), whose cystic fibrosis has prevented her from leaving their home in Austin, Texas. While Jill is her sister’s only looking glass into the outside world, Isabella is the only voice of reason in hers. 

When Isabelle abruptly dies, a devastated Jill continues to leave voicemails and life updates to her sister on her old phone number, unaware that the number has been reassigned. Here enters the movie’s male lead, Wes, played by Nick Robinson, a real estate agent in Austin whose new work phone is the new recipient of Jill’s audio diaries. 

While the voicemails are all silly, wacky, and provide TMI comedic relief, hopeless romantics can watch as these two unlikely and chaotically lovable characters find a love that is remarkably grounded, capturing the realities of love with an authenticity that feels both refreshing and deeply moving. Deutch and Robinson provide powerful performances that show that the process of grief and healing can be beautiful. 

Directed and written by Leah McKendrick, the romantic comedy-drama is based on her own experiences with leaving her sister voicemails after moving to Los Angeles to pursue her writing dreams. McKendrick’s sister, Olivia, lived in New York, which meant the time difference made it hard to catch up with each other when they weren’t busy. So, McKendrick started leaving her sister long voicemails just talking about everything in her life — noting that the messages helped her during some of the darkest times in her life. 

Thankfully, McKendrick’s sister is still very much alive, but using the voicemails as a medium for remembrance is a masterful storytelling tool. The start of the film shows Jill and Isabelle’s relationship, how close they were, and establishes Isabelle as her own character. We are introduced to her humor, her sadness, and her love for Jill. She isn’t just a plot device for the narrative — we learn about her gradually, even her desire to love life in gentle self-deprecating humor. 

Even with a brief introduction, Isabelle is built into a fully formed character whose death is felt in more than just the impact on the characters, but the loss of her as a person. Despite her prognosis and being stuck in a room, she felt the liveliest out of all the characters introduced. Viewers feel the absence of that liveliness to the point where one looks forward to hearing her voicemails play when Jill needs to hear her sister’s voice. 

The voicemails set up who both Jill and Isabelle are without having to manufacture scenes of character development. The way they talk to each other through technology reveals a bond and a familial intimacy that encapsulates their relationship for all to see. It makes it even more profoundly melancholic when Isabelle can no longer leave new messages of her own. Despite this, Jill’s continuing to talk to her sister as if she never left, even though she acknowledges her death, is beautiful to see. There is a rawness and complete vulnerability that, at times, feels like you are watching a vlog rather than a film. 

Grief isn’t linear, and that phrase encapsulates the main theme of the film. Grieving, as a process, is never truly over — the difference is learning to find warmth in remembering what you lost. Wes, despite losing his mother at a young age, still deals with the grief in small ways. Jill’s grief is a constant battle between moving forward and feeling lost. Despite this newfound missing piece, the romance between Jill and Wes never feels like a bridge to avoid grieving or to replace Isabelle. 

Wes’ intrigue and love for Jill comes from hearing who she was at her worst and her finding her way back. Jill loves Wes because of his willingness to be himself and have fun, even if at times he is shy or pessimistic. Their connection is defined by their ability to be empathetic, vulnerable, patient, and understanding with each other. Both put themselves aside to understand the other – showing that love can coincide with grief. 

Wes’ grief for the loss of his mother isn’t a main focus point of his character. It also isn’t mentioned often; he even downplays it at times due to his lack of memories of her. Yet, in moments like their first date, when Jill makes the dish that his mother used to make him, we see his grief manifest. In one subtle moment, he is seen by Jill and remembers one of the most important people he’s lost. It is a deeply intimate scene that marks a turn in their relationship. 

The chemistry between Deutch and Robinson is built upon these little moments of understanding between the characters. Acknowledging the way those they have lost impacted them, and motivating each other to continue. Wes was the one to motivate Jill to lean into her specialty of desert tacos, Isabelle’s favorite food that Jill made, to start her own business and finally be the baker of her dreams. 

That is why this story resonates the way it does. The voicemails represent a security blanket for the loss and nostalgia of grief until the healing process progresses enough that they’re not needed. 

Turning grief into something tender, hopeful and profoundly human, Voicemails for Isabelle is more than a romance — it suggests that the people we lose continue to shape us through memories, lessons, and love. It is a heartfelt letter to healing — learning to carry grief instead of overcoming it. 

Voicemails for Isabelle is now streaming on Netflix.

Spider-Man’s New Popcorn Bucket Is Getting the Dune Treatment

Not long ago, film theater merchandise was fairly straightforward. You got a themed popcorn tub, maybe a collectible cup, and went on with your day. Somewhere along the way, however, Hollywood has started to churn out merchandise that has you stop and think, “Did nobody look at this before it went into production?” 

This trend arguably (but not really) started with Dune: Part Two’s infamous Arrakis sandworm popcorn bucket, which instantly became an internet sensation for reasons that had very little to do with Denis Villeneuve’s 2024 sci-fi epic. What should have been a relatively standard piece of film merch instead took on a life of its own, becoming the subject of endless memes and social media jokes jabbing at the bucket’s admittedly questionable appearance. 

Since then, theaters have found themselves repeatedly at the center of accidental, or possibly not so accidental, questionable merchandise designs. The latest entry comes courtesy of Spider-Man: Brand New Day, whose newly revealed Cinemark popcorn bucket on Instagram has already caused many double-takes online. 

The collectible is designed to look like Spidey’s signature web-shooting pose with a large cone-shaped web structure with a straw to serve as both a popcorn holder and drinking vessel. It’s a clever idea in theory, one must admit. In execution, many fans have started to point out that the web portion of the collectible evokes something considerably less family-friendly. 

In response to Cinemark’s post, an Instagram user wrote a mellow, “We need to chill on the popcorn buckets, I think.” Others were less restrained in their commentary, with one joking, “Chum bucket remove the ‘h,’” while another added in disbelief, “No one actually thought about the cup, I see.” Possibly the most blunt (and hilarious) commenter said, “I don’t want a Spider-Man jizz tornado, thank you.”

Still, as bizarre as Spider-Man’s concession stand may be, it’s far from an isolated case. In fact, it’s not even the only superhero collectible to spark this kind of reaction this year. 

promotional “gripper” cup for James Gunn’s upcoming Supergirl went viral after fans noticed that its suited-torso design featuring Kara’s jacket from the Superman film looked suspiciously like another body part entirely. The internet immediately dubbed it the “Supergirl foreskin cup,” prompting many people to assume the images circulating online had to be AI-generated. They were not. The cup is very real, proving once again that reality continues to outperform parody when it comes to film merchandise. 

At this point, the pattern is becoming difficult to ignore even if you insist your mind isn’t in the gutter. Which raises an increasingly real possibility: none of this is accidental. 

Studios and theater chains have now seen firsthand what happens when a collectible goes viral. While some make their intentions clear, like the Deadpool-designed Wolverine popcorn bucket for the 2024 Deadpool & Wolverine film (there was something in the air in 2024, wow), others are harder to read. Items like the Supergirl cup and Spider-Man: Brand New Day’s combo container make it less obvious whether these designs are simply unfortunate coincidences or deliberate attempts at engineered viral marketing.  

To be fair, plenty of fans genuinely like Cinemark’s batch of Brand New Day merch. The simple but classic Spidey-face water bottle and comic-printed blanket have received much warmer reception, offering something a little more understated for the non-freaky fans. Well, in all fairness, Spider-Man collectors rarely need much convincing to add any new item to their shelves.

Regardless, as the Dune bucket proved, and as the Supergirl cup and Spider-Man container now seem to be proving once more, the weirdest item at the theaters almost always becomes the story. 

Spider-Man: Brand New Day doesn’t arrive until July 31, yet the buzz around the movie is well underway. Regardless of intensity, the design choices have clearly done their job of sparking conversation, going viral, and keeping the film in the spotlight. At this point, whether it’s accidental or not, it’s hard to argue with the results, and Hollywood may well find there’s no reason to not push things even further into absurdity.

Leviticus Ending Explained and Unpacked with the Director

This article contains major Leviticus spoilers.

On the same Friday that first-time feature director Adrian Chiarella’s Leviticus is opening nationwide in the U.S., the Australian filmmaker is having lunch in Los Angeles with someone else in the industry. They’re there to discuss work, presumably some prospects for the future, and maybe the SoCal weather. And yet, as Chiarella recounts a few hours later, the most passionate, driving topic of conversation came down to the end of his new horror film and Mia Wasikowska’s portrait of bad parenting decisions in it.

“They really wanted to get to the heart of that,” Chiarella recounts with a wry smile. If you’ve seen the movie, you’d understand why.

In a summer full of potent, “elevated” horror with heavy subtext, Leviticus might be the heaviest. Here’s a film where deeply religious rural communities in Australia turn to a holy man for guidance. This so-called “deliverance healer” practices a form gay conversion therapy prayer that instead of blessing queer teenagers curses them to be stalked by their own desires. A literal demon (or the like) hunts the children down by taking the form of the person they desire most, attempting to lure them to a horrifyingly brutal death.

For Chiarella, it began in part by researching various different gay conversion therapy practices around the world and looking for a through-line.

“What they all seemed to have in common was there was an element of performative scaring people out of their feelings,” the writer-director explains. “There were cases of exorcisms performed in cultures all around the world on queer teenagers, and I started to think about what are they actually doing? Are they taking something out, as they’re claiming to do, or are they just putting something in? They’re infecting people with a fear of their own feelings and their own desires. That’s really how I came up with the idea of this monster that takes the shape of the person you’re most attracted to.”

That is the devastating hook of Leviticus, but the ending revelation is the final gut-punch. Before that moment, poor Naim (Joe Bird) has lost the ability to trust Ryan (Stacy Clausen), both because half the time he sees Ryan it might be a dream-demon trying to lure him to his death, and the other half of the time… well, it’s complicated. Yet as a teenage kid who’s in way over his head, the one person Naim should be able to turn to is his mother Arlene (Wasikowska). But she also disabused Naim and the audience of her trust when she became the one to drive her son, kicking and screaming, to the deliverance healer.

However, it is only in Wasikowska’s final scene with Bird that the full extent of the betrayal become clear. After refusing to hear any of her son’s laments, she belatedly confides, “It can’t be undone.” What was done to him, she was told, is irreversible. She isn’t apologizing though; as Mom sees it, she won’t be around forever and she thinks her son, like everyone, “needs fear” to stay on the righteous, narrow, and Christian path.

“I want the audience to take what they want from that,” Chiarella tells us. “She knew that she was putting her child at risk, how far she thought she was going, I want the audience to try and attach their own meaning to, depending on their own experiences. It’s why we have that little subplot of the pastor and, and his wife losing their child, and the grief that they were experiencing is just sort of glimpsed.”

Indeed, the helmer spoke at length with actors Ewen Leslie and Edwina Wren about how much the parents of another gay child—a kid who ends up butchered by the demon—knew about their deal with the deliverance preacher before going to him, and who was more supportive of the act. And, of course, he spoke about the level of complicity with Wasikowska.

Says Chiarella, “Those little things are the reason why I went with such experienced and qualified actors to play the adults in the film, because they don’t really get a lot of screen time. We don’t follow them off for their own subplots. They have to bring the weight of all of that in the brief moments that we see them.”

Varying levels of complicity and moral culpability are part and parcel for the horror genre though. As a young Millennial filmmaker, Chiarella grew up inheriting the American horror cinema of the 1980s where the parents are often obstacles, an antagonistic presence in their children’s lives that’s incapable of accepting the ghosts of Freddy Krueger or Jason Voorhees are real.

“Quite often those films were about sex and sexuality, and turning sex into [violence],” he adds. “For most of those films, it was heterosexual sex, but turning it into a transgression that was going to bring doom and curses upon these young characters, that was something I was very aware of, ever since I watched those films as a very young kid.”

It was also something he wished to duplicate in Leviticus, and not only with the parents. The film, indeed, asks a lot of the audience when it comes to sympathizing with Joe Bird’s Naim since this kid also, in a fit of jealousy upon learning his semi-boyfriend Ryan is hooking up with the pastor’s son, tells said pastor about the kiss. In effect, by outing the two other closeted kids in his religious community, Naim helps invite the deliverance healer’s twisted brand of Christianity into the town.

“What I’ve always loved about horror movies is the convention where there’s some transgression committed—don’t feed this thing, don’t cross this land, don’t do this thing that we’re warning you about—and then the transgression is committed and that is what unleashes the curse or the monster or the horrible thing that starts terrorizing the characters. But I really love the horror movies where it’s a little gray who committed the transgression and what that was. So I wanted with this film a sense of, ‘Well, did this happen because of the parents and what they did and what they believe in? Did it happen because Joe’s character went and committed this betrayal? Did it happen because of what Stacy’s character did?’”

To the writer-director, it began with forces far beyond any individual character in his movie. While Chiarella was not raised in a religious household, he had friends and extended family who were, and he has always been deeply aware of Pentecostal and other Christian communities Down Under who might embrace homophobic ideology. And he cites the germ of Leviticus being specifically planted around the time of the Australian Marriage Law Postal Survey, a national survey sent out in 2017 asking every voter if they would support letting same-sex couples marry.

Says Chiarella, “Every single person in the country got to put in their ballot about whether or not same-sex marriage would be legal, and then what that led to was this public debate in the lead up where a lot of homophobic language was being thrown around. So even though we won that vote—I think it was about two-thirds of the country approved of it, and so they did legalize same-sex marriage—in the aftermath of that, there was still all of this language that had been platformed and all of this rhetoric that was still going around.”

For the record, the filmmaker does not consider his film or his personal perspective to be anti-religious. However, by virtue of titling the movie Leviticus, he is calling down a religious text that can be triggering for many in the audience.

“For people in our community, [Leviticus] is a word that carries a lot of weight because of the way it has perhaps been weaponized and communicated,” Chiarella considers. “I think this is a film that’s not so much anti-religion as it is about an interpretation and how people take particular meanings from things and then use them to weaponize those ideas against people.”

The intent of the film is to use horror as a metaphor for literalizing that anxiety. The filmmakers want you to feel as much anxiety and apprehension as relief when Naim and Ryan share a moment on a bus, because like the characters, you’ve been conditioned to think moments of romance or sensuality come coupled with violent pain and anguish.

In Chiarella’s mind, though, he didn’t really know if it worked until he saw it playing at Sundance earlier this year—to such a rapturous reception that indie tastemaker NEON acquired the film for $5 million.

“You can test it out on people you know, but until it’s in an actual theater in front of hundreds, you actually don’t know if the emotion and that sort of gut feeling I’m trying to give everybody actually land,” Chiarella says. “So it was such a relief to play the film at Sundance and just hear those reactions in the first few minutes of the film and just know that it was all landing. That was the bit where I really was able to feel like, ‘Okay, we’ve done something here.’ And then the fact that NEON picked it up, and now it’s opening today on, I think a bit over a few over 1,000 screens, I didn’t really expect it to reach that wide.”

The most rewarding aspect, however, might be how it’s already found a place in the LGBTQ+ cinema landscape. “I certainly didn’t expect all of the fan art and the fan edits and fan fiction to come out of it,” the filmmaker gratefully adds. And particularly seeing the film premiere in Park City, Utah and then play in Austin, Texas for SXSW was illuminating.

Explains Chiarella, “Sundance and South By, they’re held in these regional parts of the U.S., which has been really interesting. You just don’t get industry people going to those festivals, you get people who are from those areas, and local viewer audiences, and a lot of them came forward and spoke about their experiences growing up queer in particular communities, and how the film, shapeshifting demons aside, really spoke to them and their experience. So that was actually really special to know the film was landing with the people I had made it for.”

It’s meant to be an escape from the Arlenes of the world.

Leviticus is playing in theaters now.

Famke Janssen Thinks Avengers: Doomsday Is Missing an X-Men Staple

Marvel’s Avengers: Doomsday has promised a truly massive cast, bringing together core groups from across the MCU’s  biggest corners The Avengers, the Fantastic Four, the Thunderbolts, and the X-Men

For longtime fans of the Fox X-Men era in particular, the appeal in the upcoming film lies in seeing so many familiar faces return after years away from the franchise. Nearly the entire original cast is set to return, with Patrick Stewart as Professor X, Ian McKellen as Magneto, Rebecca Romijn as Mystique, James Marsden as Cyclops, Alan Cumming as Nightcrawler, and Kelsey Grammer as Beast. 

Three of the franchise’s most iconic figures, Halle Berry’s Storm, Hugh Jackman’s Wolverine, and Famke Janssen’s Jean Grey, are notably absent from the announced returnees, however. 

Berry last expressed her disappointment in being excluded in Doomsday in February, telling ScreenRant, “While I’m sad I won’t be in Doomsday this round, there are other rounds,” and that she would play the Mistress of the Elements “in a heartbeat” if given the opportunity. 

Around the same time, while promoting Crime 101, Berry joked with us that co-star Chris Hemsworth might help change her involvement status with the project. When the idea of her absence from the new ensemble came up, Berry laughed and said “Chris is going to fix that,” with Hemsworth quickly playing along, agreeing “I”m going to fix that” 

Like Berry, Hugh Jackman also faced questions about whether he’ll suit up again for the film. Speaking with Adam Lupis in May while promoting The Sheep Detectives, the actor played coy when asked about a potential Wolverine return, saying, “I have no idea what you’re talking about. What is it? Dooms-what? Who knows?” 

More recently, Janssen adopted a more pointed tone when discussing the film at Spacecon 2026 with Nerdtropolis, saying, “I think they made a mistake, but hey, who am I? I’m just a little me who thinks that.” She also addressed the ongoing speculation around her involvement, insisting she is not part of the project and joking about how difficult she finds it to hide anything from fans. “I am so bad at keeping secrets that I always say to everyone, ‘I’m the worst actor in the world,’” she said. “It’s all on my face. You right away will read it.” 

Janssen made her Jean Grey debut in the 2000’s X-Men, introducing audiences to the telepathic mutant also known as the Phoenix. She went on to reprise the role in X2: X-Men United and X-Men: The Last Stand, continuing the character’s arc across the original trilogy. Later, she returned for brief appearances in The Wolverine and X-Men: Days of Future Past

Although Janssen has previously expressed interest in stepping back into the role, she revealed last November that she has “never ever” been contacted by Disney about returning as Jean Grey for any upcoming MCU projects. Speaking to Entertainment Weekly, she noted how often the topic comes up in interviews, saying, “Every time I do an interview, it’s mentioned.” 

Janssen added that she understands why fans continue to bring the return even years later, though. “I should be flattered, I suppose, that this character has resonated with people. It’s been so long, but it’s nice that people are still talking about her.” It’s no wonder too seeing how much of a crucial role Jean Grey plays in any X-Men story, movie, or otherwise. 

That being said, it seems there might be a reason for why Janssen’s version of the character may be left behind in particular. Some fans have speculated that Sadie Sink will take up the Phoenix mantle in Spider-Man: Brand New Day, seeing as her mysterious character has been described as a dangerous mind-controller. 

That theory becomes even more plausible when considering Marvel’s new MCU plans for the mutant franchise. With Jake Schreier now set to direct the upcoming X-Men reboot, the studio appears to be looking toward the future with a younger cast in mind rather than simply extending the Fox-era cast’s stay indefinitely. 

Of course, much of this remains speculation. Marvel has only revealed what they want to reveal of Doomsday’s sprawling cast, and there are surely surprises no one could expect yet to come. 

Whether Janssen’s comments truly signal the end of her time as Jean Grey, whether Sadie Sink is playing the MCU’s version of the character, and how Marvel ultimately plans to introduce its new generation of X-Men are questions that likely won’t be answered until Avengers: Doomsday arrives in theaters on December 18, 2026. 

Turok: Origins Brings the Dino Hunter Back from the Dead

Any millennial who had a Nintendo 64 will tell you that one of the staples for the console was Turok, a franchise which began with 1997’s Turok: Dinosaur Hunter and released four games on the N64 alone. Since then, the first-person shooter title has struggled to maintain its relevance and audience over subsequent gaming generations, seemingly coming to an end with 2008’s Turok, published by Disney Interactive Studios of all companies. Saber Interactive has now taken the reins on the series with the upcoming Turok: Origins, which we got to play at Summer Game Fest 2026 as part of their demos available on-site, including Clive Barker’s Hellraiser: Revival.

Playable solo or in a team of up to three people, Turok: Origins unfolds like a linear mission-driven shooter in the tradition of Saber’s recent Warhammer 40,000: Space Marine 2 albeit with its sci-fi/prehistoric aesthetic mash-up still very much intact. Players have an option between three character classes to choose from between deployments, each with their own loadouts and special abilities to support the squad. We personally went with the more acrobatic Raven class and the middle of the road Cougar class, though we were intrigued by the hard-hitting, tank-like Bison class and teamed up with several Bison players in our run.

Once deployed, Turok: Origins feels right within the arcade-style wheelhouse that made its original titles so much fun. There is no question of where to go next, no set of complex mission objectives, at least not in the build that we played. It’s simply a matter of progressing to the next enemy encounter, usually in an arena-like portion of the level, and blasting and/or cutting down every enemy in the immediate area into digitized viscera. And, naturally, this straightforward approach is where the entire game excels.

All of the weapons that we tried felt intuitive and distinct from one another, be it futuristic assault rifles to chugging shotguns with plenty of up-close stopping power. The action is as frenetically paced as you can imagine, but we never got lost in the chaos, being able to tell where the enemies were coming from and keep track of where the ammo and health restoratives were around a given level. And every class has their own glory kill animations for each major enemy type in the game when the target’s health is low enough, denoted by a glowing outline, which had us rushing in to finish off each vulnerable opponent in gruesomely satisfying ways.

And did I personally get the glory kill on the final boss of this demo build? I sure did and, yes, it felt fantastic.

The game also looks much more visually impressive than I anticipated, rather than the repetitive environments and assets that tend to get used in a lot of contemporary extraction shooters. While not the most eye-popping game that we played during SGF 2026 weekend, Turok: Origins also isn’t necessarily trying to go for the most detailed and hardware-pushing presentation. The game keeps its levels varied enough and the combat runs smoothly, even with the controlled chaos of having multiple players and enemies running around trying to kill each other.

The big thing to get used to, and this was more noticeable in a primarily interior mission that closed out our demo, is some of the level traversal mechanics. There are some areas where you can just sprint and jump and others where you need to use a grappling hook mechanic to swing across wider gaps. These moments were some of the less intuitive sequences in the demo compared to the more open environments, with minimal climbing and jumping. In the grand scheme, these are more quibbles than anything else but if I had to cite one area of improvement in the demo, that would definitely be it.

Thankfully, those segments seem to be few and far in between, with the developers recognizing that Turok handles better as a fast-paced shooter than a platforming experience. And even with this in mind, we were never fully taken out of the experience and would’ve loved more time, if only to see what the Bison class was all about on the battlefield. Unfortunately, the game doesn’t have a confirmed release date yet, leaving us on the hook to see how the final build will play out.

Who would’ve thought, in the Year of Our Lord 2026, that the most overtly fun first-person shooter we got to play at Summer Game Fest this year would be Turok: Origins. But it’s true and it’s caught us by surprise as much as anything else, reminding fans that the once-prolific dinosaur hunter should never be counted out completely. Though we only played an early build of the game, we definitely have the title on our radar now rather than regarding it as another attempt to revive a ‘90s franchise. Turok: Origins has enough of the sauce to bring the series back to prominence, or at least does its fans justice in a way its 2000s era titles didn’t.

Welcome back, Turok. We missed you.

Developed and published by Saber Interactive, Turok: Origins is slated for release in late 2026 on PlayStation 5, Xbox Series X|S, Nintendo Switch 2, and PC.

Tom Hanks Can’t Face Watching One Cast Away Moment Again: “I Will Get Up and Leave the Room”

Though some found Robert Zemeckis’ survival drama Cast Away flawed (usually for its abrupt ending), it was well received by critics and a box-office hit for the director and his star, Tom Hanks.

The 2000 movie was also parodied to death in the decades following its release, after a pivotal scene saw FedEx systems analyst Chuck Noland (Hanks) lose his Wilson volleyball companion to the ocean during a final escape from the deserted island he’d washed up on. “Wilson!” Hanks screams-sobs as the ball floats out of reach. “Wilsonnnnnnn!!!!” Hard not to hear it in your head even now, right?

But Chuck losing Wilson isn’t the Cast Away scene that still haunts Hanks today; it’s an entirely different moment in the movie he has a problem with—and it’s likely a moment that no one else got stuck on but him.

“I do not watch these movies after the first time,” Hanks first revealed to Richard Osman and Marina Hyde on The Rest Is Entertainment podcast. “There are movies that have moments in that I cannot watch because I didn’t get there. There is a moment that it was painful for me where I just think, ‘I’m not there.’”

Hanks added, “At the end of the 47th day of shooting, in the 14th hour of the day, you still have to capture an emotional bit of lightning in a bottle that is going to last forever, whether you do it well or not. There remains forever a terrifying moment of, ‘Am I going to be escorted off the set and off the lot because the authenticity police have dubbed me a crook?’”

Hanks then singled out Cast Away as a specific film he can’t fully rewatch. “There is a moment in that it was painful for me in Cast Away in which I am back, and Chuck is back in Kelly’s house and he gives her watch back. And there is a moment where I just think, ‘I am not there.’ All it is is a turnaround on me, but I do this gesture that I just think is false and is me and is not Chuck. And if the movie is on, I will get up and leave the room before that scene comes on.”

The Toy Story 5 and Saving Private Ryan actor says he didn’t notice the Cast Away moment in question until he finally saw the movie, but it seems to have bugged him ever since. He also won’t really give himself credit for the great moments he did ace.

“I don’t sit there and say, ‘Oh, watch this movie. Watch this move that comes up, we really nailed that.’ I look at it, and all I can say is, ‘I was cold. It looks like I’m warm. I was really freezing that day, or that beard was sticky’. I can say things like that.”

TV Premiere Dates: 2026 Calendar

Wondering when your favorite shows are coming back and what new series you can look forward to? We’ve got you covered with the Den of Geek 2026 TV Premiere Dates Calendar, where we keep track of TV series premiere dates, return dates, and more for the year and beyond. 

We’ll continue to update this page weekly as networks and streamers announce dates. A lot of these shows we’ll be watching or covering, so be sure to follow along with us! 

Please note that all times are ET. 

Note: These are U.S. releases. For upcoming British releases, head on over here.

DATESHOWNETWORK
Monday, June 22Rhythm + Flow: Italy Season 3Netflix
Wednesday, June 24The American ExperimentNetflix
Wednesday, June 24Another Self Season 3Netflix
Thursday, June 25FX’s The Bear Season 5 (9:00 p.m.)FX | Hulu
Thursday, June 25Avatar: The Last Airbender Season 2Netflix
Friday, June 26Life, Larry, and the Pursuit of Happiness (9:00 p.m.)HBO
Friday, June 26StrungPeacock
Saturday, June 27Agent Kim ReactivatedNetflix
Monday, June 29Adventure Time: Side QuestsDisney+ | Hulu
Tuesday, June 30Ruthless Season 6Paramount+
Wednesday, July 1Worst Neighbor EverNetflix
Wednesday, July 1Elle Season 1Prime Video
Wednesday, July 1X-Men ’97 Season 2Disney+
Thursday, July 2Survival of the Thickest Season 3Netflix
Friday, July 3Silo Season 3Apple TV
Wednesday, July 8Trying Season 5Apple TV
Thursday, July 9Little House on the Prairie Season 1Netflix
Thursday, July 9The Five Star WeekendPeacock
Sunday, July 12The Westies (9:00 p.m.)MGM+
Wednesday, July 15Ride or DiePrime Video
Wednesday, July 15LuckyApple TV
Thursday, July 16The HawkNetflix
Thursday, July 23Stuart Fails to Save the Universe (9:00 p.m.)HBO Max
Sunday, July 26The Walking Dead: Dead City Season 3 AMC
Wednesday, July 29Diarra from DetroitParamount+
Sunday, August 2Lioness Season 3Paramount+
Monday, August 3Futurama Season 14Hulu
Wednesday, August 5Ted Lasso Season 4Apple TV
Wednesday, August 5The Shards (9:00 p.m.)FX | Hulu
Friday, August 7Alley CatsNetflix
Sunday, August 9The Chosen in the Wild with Bear GryllsPrime Video
Thursday, August 13Tires Season 3Netflix
Sunday, August 16LanternsHBO Max
Thursday, August 20Outer Banks Season 5Netflix
Wednesday, August 26One Hundred Years of Solitude: Part TwoNetflix
Wednesday, September 9Last SeenApple TV
Wednesday, September 16Slow Horses Season 6Apple TV
Wednesday, September 16South Park Season 29 (10:00 p.m.)Comedy Central
Thursday, September 24A Different WorldNetflix
Thursday, October 15Crystal LakePeacock
Wednesday, October 21The Terminal List Season 2Prime Video
Friday, October 23Lupin Part 4Netflix
Wednesday, November 11The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of PowerPrime Video
Thursday, November 12The Good DaughterPeacock
Friday, December 25Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s StoneHBO Max

If we’ve forgotten a show, feel free to drop a reminder in the comment section below!

Want to know what big movies are coming out in 2026? We’ve got you covered here.

Movies from the ’70s & ’80s You Can’t Watch Anymore

The 70s and 80s gave us many classics we still enjoy today, movies that have shaped what we understand cinema to be. However, during that experimenting period, many other movies came out that challenge our sensitivities today. We aren’t just ‘emotional,’ we are more comprehensive today when it comes to what is ok to show in movies.

These are the films that you can’t enjoy today due to their content. We’ve also included a few entries that, while technically fine content wise, are physically hard to find, fitting with the theme of media lost to time.

IMDb

The Kentucky Fried Movie

This 1977 sketch comedy from the creators of Airplane! is packed with jokes that would never survive a modern studio release. Some sketches are now remembered as much for their offensiveness as their humor.

IMDb

Cruising

William Friedkin’s 1980 thriller remains controversial decades later. Its depiction of New York’s gay leather subculture sparked protests upon release and continues to divide audiences and critics today.

IMDb

Soul Man

The premise alone makes modern viewers wince. In this 1986 comedy, a white student darkens his skin to qualify for a scholarship, making it one of the most frequently cited examples of an aging poorly concept.

IMDb

The Toy

Richard Pryor remains hilarious, but the film’s central premise involving a wealthy man effectively purchasing another human being as a plaything makes many viewers uncomfortable today.

IMDb

Revenge of the Nerds

Once considered an underdog classic, the film has undergone major reevaluation. Several scenes involving consent and intimate deception are now discussed far more than the movie’s comedy.

IMDb

The Gods Must Be Crazy

This 1980 international hit remains beloved by many viewers, but critics have increasingly questioned aspects of its portrayal of African characters and cultures through a modern lens.

IMDb

The Cannonball Run

Packed with celebrity cameos, the film also includes racial and ethnic stereotypes that were common in broad comedies of the era but draw far more scrutiny today.

IMDb

Sixteen Candles

John Hughes’ coming-of-age classic remains influential, but several jokes and character portrayals have become recurring points of criticism among modern audiences revisiting the film.

IMDb

Bachelor Party

Tom Hanks’ early comedy was a success in 1984, yet many of its jokes reflect attitudes and humor that have become far less acceptable to contemporary viewers.

IMDb

The Day the Clown Cried

Jerry Lewis’ infamous unreleased film about a clown in a Nazi concentration camp became legendary largely because almost nobody has actually seen it. It remains one of cinema’s most famous lost movies.

IMDb

Let’s Get Harry

This 1986 action film has never achieved widespread availability on modern streaming platforms. It occasionally resurfaces through specialty releases but remains largely forgotten and difficult for casual viewers to locate.

IMDb

Nothing Lasts Forever

Despite starring Bill Murray, Dan Aykroyd, and Zach Galligan, this 1984 fantasy comedy was shelved before receiving a proper theatrical release. For years it was nearly impossible to see outside rare broadcasts.

Superman Returns Editor Looks Back at Some of the Film’s Biggest Problems

Superman Returns definitely has its fans—including Quentin Tarantino—but it was a “one and done” DC movie for director Bryan Singer and his version of Clark Kent, Brandon Routh. Though there’s been much discussion over the years about both Singer and Routh’s co-star, Kevin Spacey, Superman Returns was released at a different time in a different cultural landscape, yet it still didn’t meet the studio’s expectations at the box office back in 2006.

Editor John Ottman, who worked on many of Singer’s films until he stopped making them midway through 2018’s award-winning Bohemian Rhapsody, has been looking back at the main issues with Superman Returns in conversation with Half the Picture and says that one of the movie’s problems was actually its deep respect for Richard Donner’s original movie.

“I think one of the problems with Superman Returns is that we were so trying to be so reverential to the ’78 version,” he mused. “It was crippled to go in a new direction. At the same time, I like the fact that it stayed true to the feeling that Superman should have. He should be a very positive, good force.”

Ottman went on to hint that Superman Returns’ “positive, good force” contrasted with Zack Snyder’s take on the character, which began in 2013. “When those dark ones came later, I was like, ‘What is this garbage?’ you know? So, not that ours was great; it’s like ours was very flawed as well. It was a beautiful film. I think it was beautifully done. I just think the plot by Lex Luthor was derivative of before.”

According to Ottman, other perceived problems in the movie were Parker Posey’s Kitty Kowalski, one of Lex Luthor’s henchwomen, who Ottman says “had nothing to do”, and Kate Bosworth’s Lois Lane, who was “fantastic” but “miscast”.

“Not that everyone has to be Margot Kidder [but] she needed to be more endearing,” Ottman explained. “We need to laugh with her at least once or something, and she was so ‘hard-hitting reporter with a Pulitzer’ at like, what, 12? You know, I just didn’t buy it.”

The editor, who also worked on this year’s box-office hit Michael, also discussed the irony of Bosworth’s miscasting after initial concerns focused on Routh’s performance as Superman.

“The funny thing is we were so concerned about [whether] Brandon pulled it off, [but] the whole time it was really her character that was the problem, I think,” Ottman told the podcast. “Not that she was bad, she was excellent in the film and she’s a really good actress, it’s just I felt she was miscast or she was miswritten or something. It wasn’t her fault. So all along it really wasn’t Brandon that shouldn’t have been the worry of ours, it was that role, I think. I think they would have had a more fun relationship, had she been a little more endearing in a way.”

Ottman also thinks Superman Returns’ long title sequence “bogged it down” and that the movie should have got its plot going faster.

Are you a Superman Returns defender? Is it better than Snyder’s movies? Do you think Routh should have continued on in the role? As always, let us know in the comments.

15 People Share the Oldest Video Game They Remember Playing

Video games have been with us for quite a while now, helping many generations grow and discover new ways to solve problems. As we grow older, we often look fondly on the first few games that introduced us to the medium, and the different ages have their own ‘classic’ games.

Users of Reddit gathered to discuss just that, and the different ages of the participants couldn’t be more obvious. Some remember playing the very first video game in existence, while others played as children what others consider games from their teenage years. These are a selection of games they were discussing.

r/OldSchoolCool/harleybug88

Pong

For many older gamers, Pong wasn’t just their first video game, it was their introduction to electronic entertainment entirely. Two paddles and a bouncing square were enough to create a lifelong hobby.

IMDb

Duck Hunt

The NES light gun made Duck Hunt feel magical to kids. Pointing a plastic pistol at the television and actually affecting what happened on screen seemed like futuristic technology at the time.

YouTube/Game Archive

Space Invaders

Arcades and home conversions introduced countless players to Space Invaders. The simple task of shooting descending aliens became one of gaming’s earliest worldwide phenomena.

YouTube/nineko

Battle Chess

Many PC gamers fondly remember Battle Chess on floppy disks. The game followed normal chess rules, but every captured piece triggered elaborate animated battles that made the ancient board game feel exciting.

IMDb

Super Mario Bros.

Nintendo’s landmark platformer served as a first gaming experience for an entire generation. Running, jumping, and discovering secrets in the Mushroom Kingdom created memories that have lasted for decades.

YouTube/wc10k

Leisure Suit Larry

Some players discovered gaming through the notoriously adult-oriented Leisure Suit Larry. Whether they were old enough to play it or not, its humor and puzzle-solving left a lasting impression.

IMDb

Pac-Man

The yellow dot-eating icon became one of the most recognizable video game characters ever created. For many people, Pac-Man was the first game they encountered in an arcade.

YouTube/4k Retro Gaming

Intellivision Baseball

Sports fans often remember Intellivision Baseball as their introduction to gaming. Its graphics seem primitive now, but the ability to play a baseball game on television felt revolutionary.

IMDb

Tetris

Countless Game Boy owners received the handheld bundled with Tetris. The puzzle game’s simple design and endless replayability made it one of the most memorable first gaming experiences ever.

IMDb

Streets of Rage 2

Many Sega fans have vivid memories of cooperative sessions in Streets of Rage 2. The side-scrolling action and memorable soundtrack helped make it a defining game of the early 1990s.

IMDb

Frogger

Crossing roads and rivers sounds simple, but Frogger became an arcade classic. Many gamers still remember desperately trying to guide a tiny frog safely across increasingly dangerous obstacles.

YouTube/kiraa96

Minesweeper

For a generation of PC users, Minesweeper arrived preinstalled and ready to play. It introduced countless people to gaming during school breaks, office downtime, or long afternoons at home.

IMDb

Sonic the Hedgehog

The original Sonic the Hedgehog showcased the Sega Genesis with speed unlike anything many players had seen. For countless kids, it was their very first console gaming experience.

YouTube/Shortmandesigner

The Oregon Trail

Many students encountered The Oregon Trail in school computer labs. Learning about westward expansion while trying not to die from dysentery became a surprisingly memorable gaming experience.

IMDb

Crash Bandicoot

The original PlayStation introduced many players to 3D platforming through Crash Bandicoot. Navigating its colorful levels became a formative gaming memory for countless late-1990s kids.

15 Actors Who Live Their Life in the Background

We consider successful actors to be the headliners of a movie, the million dollar face that sells tickets worldwide. Yet we don’t judge other professions with the same pressure; after all, success for most of us is having a bit of disposable income, if at all.

Well, background actors are successful in their own way. These actors have mastered the art of playing coworkers, best friends, police captains, neighbors, villains, mentors, and countless other supporting roles. While they occasionally land leading parts, their careers are largely defined by making the stars around them look even better.

IMDb

Stephen Root

Stephen Root has spent decades appearing in everything from Office Space to Barry. Rarely the lead, he consistently elevates supporting roles with such reliability that audiences often recognize him before remembering his name.

IMDb

William Fichtner

Whether playing law enforcement officers, military personnel, or mysterious authority figures, William Fichtner has built a career as one of Hollywood’s most dependable supporting actors across film and television.

IMDb

J.T. Walsh

Before his death, J.T. Walsh became famous for portraying politicians, executives, and authority figures. He rarely received top billing, but his presence immediately added credibility to almost any project.

IMDb

Margo Martindale

Margo Martindale has become one of television’s most respected character actors. She regularly appears in acclaimed dramas and comedies, often leaving a lasting impression despite limited screen time.

IMDb

David Morse

Tall, imposing, and endlessly versatile, David Morse frequently plays soldiers, detectives, and authority figures. His career is filled with memorable supporting performances rather than traditional leading-man roles.

IMDb

James Cromwell

James Cromwell has appeared in countless films and television shows over several decades. Despite occasional starring roles, he is best known for bringing depth and gravitas to supporting characters.

IMDb

Bruce McGill

From Animal House to The Insider and countless television appearances, Bruce McGill has spent years excelling as the kind of supporting performer audiences instantly recognize.

IMDb

Richard Jenkins

Richard Jenkins occasionally headlines projects, but much of his career has been spent as an exceptional supporting actor. His ability to disappear into ordinary characters makes him particularly valuable.

IMDb

Beth Grant

Beth Grant has made a career out of memorable supporting turns. Whether playing strict authority figures, quirky neighbors, or eccentric relatives, she frequently steals scenes with limited screen time.

IMDb

Clancy Brown

Known for his distinctive voice and imposing presence, Clancy Brown appears everywhere from live-action films to animation. He often plays villains or authority figures rather than central protagonists.

IMDb

Xander Berkeley

Xander Berkeley has spent decades portraying military officers, government officials, and tough professionals. He’s one of those actors whose face seems to appear in nearly every genre imaginable.

IMDb

Harriet Sansom Harris

Harriet Sansom Harris has built a reputation as one of television’s most effective supporting performers. Her eccentric and often intense characters frequently become fan favorites despite limited appearances.

IMDb

Kevin Dunn

Kevin Dunn has quietly accumulated hundreds of screen credits playing fathers, executives, politicians, and professionals. He’s a classic example of a character actor whose face is more famous than his name.

IMDb

Miguel Sandoval

Miguel Sandoval has enjoyed a long career playing detectives, doctors, and authority figures. His steady presence has made him a familiar face across television and film for decades.

IMDb

Colm Meaney

Although beloved by science-fiction fans for Star Trek, Colm Meaney has spent much of his career as a supporting player. His ability to make ordinary characters feel authentic remains his greatest strength.

13 Horror Shows That Got the Pacing Just Right

Great horror television lives and dies by pacing: move too slowly and viewers get bored before the scares arrive, move too quickly though, and the tension never has time to build. The best horror shows understand exactly when to reveal information, when to hold back, and when to unleash something terrifying.

They keep audiences hooked from episode to episode without feeling rushed or padded. Their themes can be about supernatural mysteries, psychological nightmares, or monster stories, yet what matters is that these series found the perfect rhythm. Suspense works best when the timing is just right.

IMDb

Widow’s Bay

Apple TV’s breakout horror-comedy balances mystery, scares, and humor with remarkable confidence. Each episode expands the cursed island’s mythology without dragging, allowing the story to build steadily toward revelations while maintaining tension throughout.

IMDb

The Haunting of Hill House

Mike Flanagan’s adaptation unfolds like a carefully constructed puzzle. Every episode reveals new layers of the family tragedy, keeping viewers invested while steadily escalating both the emotional stakes and supernatural horror.

IMDb

Midnight Mass

Rather than rushing to its twists, Midnight Mass spends time developing its isolated community. The deliberate buildup pays off as the story gradually transforms from character drama into something far darker.

IMDb

From

The mystery-box structure of From constantly introduces new questions while answering just enough to maintain momentum. The result is a horror series that rarely feels like it’s stalling for time.

IMDb

The Terror

The first season of The Terror expertly balances survival drama and supernatural horror. Each episode increases the desperation facing the expedition, creating a sense of dread that never lets up.

IMDb

Marianne

This French horror series wastes little time establishing its threat. The scares arrive early, but the show continues raising the stakes rather than exhausting its best material too soon.

IMDb

The Fall of the House of Usher

Mike Flanagan’s adaptation moves briskly through its doomed family’s collapse. Each episode delivers a self-contained tragedy while advancing the larger narrative toward its inevitable and satisfying conclusion.

IMDb

Penny Dreadful

Despite juggling multiple classic horror icons, Penny Dreadful maintains strong forward momentum. Character arcs and supernatural plots advance together, preventing the series from becoming bogged down by its mythology.

IMDb

Archive 81

The series gradually peels back layers of mystery through found footage and investigation. Every answer leads to new questions, creating a compelling rhythm that keeps viewers moving through episodes.

IMDb

The Outsider

Based on Stephen King’s novel, The Outsider transitions smoothly from crime investigation to supernatural horror. The gradual shift helps maintain suspense while keeping the story grounded and believable.

IMDb

Ash vs Evil Dead

The series never lingers too long between action, comedy, and horror. Its energetic pacing allows it to deliver outrageous gore while still finding room for character development.

IMDb

Kingdom

This Korean horror series combines political intrigue with zombie horror. The story moves quickly, but never so quickly that viewers lose track of the growing crisis facing the kingdom.

IMDb

Harper’s Island

Designed as a self-contained mystery, Harper’s Island eliminates characters regularly enough to maintain suspense without feeling repetitive. The result is a horror story that keeps moving toward its endgame.

The 15 Worst Episodes Of Great TV Shows

Even the greatest television shows occasionally stumble. A series can deliver years of brilliant storytelling, unforgettable characters, and classic episodes, only to produce one installment that leaves fans scratching their heads. Maybe the writers wanted to try an experiment, or the story just stops flat on its feet. Whatever the case, fans notice and make themselves known.

The fact that these episodes stand out so much is often a testament to the quality of the shows surrounding them. These are widely regarded as some of the weakest episodes from otherwise beloved television series.

IMDb

Fly – Breaking Bad

Often cited as the most divisive episode of Breaking Bad, “Fly” traps Walt and Jesse in the lab chasing a contaminating insect. Some admire its character work, while others consider it an unusually slow detour.

IMDb

Stranger in a Strange Land – Lost

Among Lost fans, this episode is notorious for revealing the origin of Jack’s tattoos. The flashbacks feel inconsequential compared to the island mysteries, making it a frequent choice for the show’s weakest outing.

IMDb

The Great Divide – Avatar: The Last Airbender

Even fans of Avatar often skip this episode. The conflict between two feuding tribes lacks the emotional depth and world-building that made the rest of the series so beloved.

IMDb

Justice – Star Trek: The Next Generation

This early Next Generation episode features a bizarre society where minor crimes are punishable by death. Many fans consider it among the show’s roughest early efforts.

IMDb

Fear Her – Doctor Who

David Tennant’s era produced many classics, but “Fear Her” rarely appears on favorite-episode lists. Its story about a lonely child trapping people in drawings is often viewed as underwhelming.

IMDb

The Principal and the Pauper – The Simpsons

This episode revealed that Principal Skinner was actually an impostor. The twist was so unpopular that later episodes largely ignored it, and many fans still consider it a major mistake.

IMDb

Intro to Felt Surrogacy – Community

This puppet episode divided viewers sharply. While some appreciated the experiment, many felt it lacked the sharp humor that defined the series.

IMDb

Space – The X-Files

One of the earliest episodes of The X-Files, “Space” is often criticized for its weak story and awkward effects. It stands out in a series otherwise known for imaginative mysteries.

IMDb

The Gang Cracks the Liberty Bell – It’s Always Sunny in Philadelphia

The colonial-era flashback episode has its defenders, but it frequently appears near the bottom of fan rankings due to its unusual premise and departure from the normal formula.

IMDb

Beer Bad – Buffy the Vampire Slayer

In this episode, magical beer causes college students to regress into cavemen. Even many devoted Buffy fans acknowledge that the concept never quite works as intended.

IMDb

In Camelot – The Sopranos

While not universally disliked, “In Camelot” often ranks low among Sopranos episodes. Its focus on Tony’s father’s former mistress lacks the intensity viewers expect from the series.

IMDb

The Long Night – Game of Thrones

The massive battle against the White Walkers should have been a defining television event. Instead, complaints about darkness, visibility, and storytelling choices made it one of the show’s most controversial episodes.

IMDb

Route 666 – Supernatural

This early Supernatural episode involving a haunted truck is frequently singled out as one of the series’ weakest. Even fans who love the show often rank it near the bottom.

IMDb

The Last Christmas – Modern Family

This late-series holiday episode is frequently cited by fans as one of the show’s weaker efforts. Misunderstandings pile up excessively, and many viewers felt the character conflicts seemed forced compared to the series’ usual charm and warmth.

IMDb

Night Family – Rick and Morty

While some fans enjoy it, others cite “Night Family” as an example of the show leaning too heavily into a single joke. Its reception was notably more mixed than many classic episodes.

15 Young Actors That Look Totally Different Now

Certain stars have been famous throughout their whole lives, and we’ve seen them grow up into incredible performers. Others, however, we only remember as they were in their youth, either because they stopped acting or we simply didn’t follow their career. Until now.

These few actors have had full lives filled with ups and downs, but we only remember a small chapter of those stories. This is how they look now, past the childhood innocence and filled with adult experience. Some you might have seen already in recent films, without realizing who they once were.

IMDb

Macaulay Culkin

The face of Home Alone was once one of the most recognizable children in the world. As an adult, Macaulay Culkin looks so different that casual viewers often fail to recognize him immediately.

IMDb

Jonathan Lipnicki

After memorable roles in Jerry Maguire and Stuart Little, Jonathan Lipnicki largely stepped away from the spotlight. His adult appearance is dramatically different from the round-faced child actor audiences remember.

IMDb

Haley Joel Osment

The star of The Sixth Sense and A.I. has remained active, but adulthood transformed his appearance completely. Many viewers are surprised when they realize they’ve been watching the same actor.

IMDb

Mara Wilson

Known for Matilda and Mrs. Doubtfire, Mara Wilson retired from major film acting while still young. Decades later, she bears little resemblance to the child star of the 1990s.

IMDb

Jake Lloyd

Millions knew Jake Lloyd as young Anakin Skywalker in The Phantom Menace. After leaving acting, he largely disappeared from public view, making his adult appearance unfamiliar to many fans.

IMDb

Danny Bonaduce

As the red-haired child star of The Partridge Family, Danny Bonaduce had a distinctive look. Years of adulthood and television work have made him nearly unrecognizable compared to his teen years.

IMDb

Barret Oliver

The young star of The NeverEnding Story left acting entirely. Today, he is better known for his work as a photographer, and his adult appearance surprises fans revisiting the fantasy classic.

IMDb

Peter Ostrum

After playing Charlie in Willy Wonka & the Chocolate Factory, Peter Ostrum never pursued an acting career. He became a veterinarian, and few would connect him to the famous child performer.

IMDb

Jeff Cohen

Best remembered as Chunk from The Goonies, Jeff Cohen left acting and became an entertainment lawyer. His transformation from lovable child actor to successful professional often shocks longtime fans.

IMDb

Miko Hughes

The child star of Pet Sematary and Kindergarten Cop had one of the most recognizable faces of the early 1990s. As an adult, he looks dramatically different from his younger self.

IMDb

Charlie Korsmo

After appearing in films such as Hook and What About Bob?, Charlie Korsmo stepped away from Hollywood. His later career in law and academia makes his childhood fame easy to forget.

IMDb

Noah Hathaway

The young Atreyu from The NeverEnding Story became an icon of 1980s fantasy cinema. Decades later, his rugged adult appearance bears little resemblance to the youthful warrior audiences remember.

IMDb

Bug Hall

Known for playing Alfalfa in The Little Rascals, Bug Hall’s childhood image remains frozen in many viewers’ minds. His adult appearance is strikingly different from the character that made him famous.

IMDb

Thomas Brodie-Sangster

Although he continued acting, many people still picture him as the child from Love Actually or Nanny McPhee. His adult roles often surprise viewers who haven’t followed his career.

IMDb

Joseph Mazzello

The young Tim Murphy from Jurassic Park grew into a successful adult actor. His appearance changed so much that many fans don’t realize he later appeared in projects like The Pacific and Bohemian Rhapsody.

Toy Story 5 Box Office Suggests Sequel Scarcity Is Still a Good Thing

Thirty-one years since Buzz and Woody first went to Infinity and Beyond, it’s safe to say that Pixar still has a friend in me. And you. Also that family down the street. Plus, now that we mention it, multiple generations of moviegoers. Which is pretty impressive when we haven’t seen a Toy Story movie since 2019—a time before Disney+, streaming wars, and the pandemic.

Even so, the studio estimates from the Father’s Day weekend are in, and according to the latest data, Toy Story 5 just grossed $160 million stateside and a total of $312 million worldwide. That’s the best opening for any Toy Story movie ever, and the second best for Pixar by either measure—with Incredibles 2 earning $183 million domestically in 2018 and Inside Out 2 grossing $384 million worldwide in 2024. Furthermore, it’s the biggest opening weekend in 2026 so far, toppling The Super Mario Galaxy Movie’s also impressive $132 million domestic bow back in April.

 Cumulatively, this is a big win for Pixar and Disney, which has somewhat commercially struggled this decade, particularly in terms of original movies and/or quasi-original movies that still attempted to rely on Toy Story IP like 2022’s Lightyear. And yet, I cannot help but notice that barring the Lightyear space oddity, Toy Story 5 is the first real movie about these characters in seven years.

With the exception of a handful of short films starring Forky and Bo Peep that were released on Disney+ back when Toy Story 4 was new and Disney+ was launching, the brand has remained relatively dormant, at least onscreen, all while multiple generations of children, parents, aunts and uncles, and even grandparents kept the flame alive via theme park visits, holiday merchandise, and by passing the older movies on to the next era of kids.

This phenomenon of keeping a beloved billion-dollar IP scarce is a rarity in the 2020s, to the point of seeming almost quaintly old-fashioned. Which also means it creates a curious juxtaposition when compared to other brands that were also grossing $1 billion-plus per entry back in 2019, including Disney contemporaries like Marvel, which in the same year saw Avengers: Endgame and Captain Marvel clear $1 billion (and $2.5 billion in the case of the one with Iron Man), and Lucasfilm’s Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker, which pocketed another cool $1 billion despite a divisive audience reception.

Speaking anecdotally, it became tempting to reminisce about “back in my day” when noticing the hard pivot from a time where audiences waited years between installments to our modern 2020s reality with the market being flooded by a glut of Marvel, Star Wars, and DC projects across multiple platforms and streaming services. Marvel particularly, and despite studio head Kevin Feige’s reluctance, increased production to the point of having a new movie, streaming series, or TV special (and sometimes several) in every fiscal quarter of 2022 and 2023. And at this point, there are more Disney+ Star Wars shows than there are movies when you count the animated series.

Five years ago, it was an open question whether Disney and its contemporaries were over-saturating the market with the short-term gains won by this abundance of product buttressing the streaming services. Meanwhile the handful of IPs kept behind relative lock and key—your James Bonds, your Mission: Impossibles, and, yes, Pixar franchises like Toy Story—were looking creaky in a modern context where we’ve seen three Minions movies, two Marios, and three different actors play Batman since Toy Story 4.

But looking at the Toy Story 5 numbers, another tale seems to be unfolding. Perhaps the best way to keep audience excitement high for a business strategy built around “event” films is to keep the idea of a new installment feeling like an actual event. With the exception of Toy Story 2, which came out four years after the original film in the ’90s, none of the sequels made in the 21st century have arrived in less than half a decade. In fact, Toy Story 5 and its seven-year gap is relatively short when compared to the 11-year gap between Toy Story 2 and Toy Story 3. And each film has shown minute care and dedication on the part of Pixar’s army of artists. Wherever Toy Story 5 ranks on your personal scale for the series, co-writer and co-director Andrew Stanton has been working with these characters since he co-wrote and helped design the original 1995 movie.

The patience and attention to detail in the film is palpable, with the filmmakers, like the audience, treating the movies akin to sacred ground. And the studio has been rewarded for that slow-walk with a movie that just opened like the 2010s never ended. There might be a lesson in these toys’ ongoing story.

House of the Dragon: Tom Bennett on the Ulf Moment That Explained Everything

This article contains spoilers for House of the Dragon season 3 episode 1.

Midway through the House of the Dragon season 3 premiere, Rhaenyra, Alicent, and the Dance of their Dragons all take a back seat for a bucolic moment of peace in the Riverlands where freshly-minted dragonriders Addam of Hull (Clinton Liberty), Hugh the Hammer (Kieran Bew), and Ulf (Tom Bennett) are gathered to keep a watchful eye out for Prince Aemond and his dragon Vhagar.

The trio is clearly bored with the assignment as, unbeknownst to them, Aemond currently has better things to do than aimlessly fly around Westeros now that he sits the Iron Throne in his missing brother’s stead. So Ulf, the most talkative among them, does what he does best and begins to speak. Without so much as a “hey, I’m about to reveal some real shit here” warning, Ulf proceeds with the details of his devastating backstory.

“Never knew my mother. Same as most of the gutter rats. Was kicked about more than a mongrel dog. Wished for death more days than I wished to live. There was this priest from Essos – fancied me, paid me coin to do things. He said I had king’s blood. That I was born for a purpose. I liked that story. So I owned it. Ulf the dragonseed. That red cunt was right!”

With one relatively brief monologue, delivered superbly from Tom Bennett, Ulf suddenly becomes one of the more compelling characters on House of the Dragon and a much more layered version than the one presented in George R.R. Martin’s source material Fire & Blood. As has been well-established, Martin’s book is presented as a historical tome written by “modern day” Westerosi maesters and therefore offers little about the true motivations of the major players of the era, let alone the B-teamers like Ulf and company.

Not only does this tragic account of Ulf’s upbringing help explain some of his cynical mindset and self-destructive behaviors, it also ties him in more closely to the Game of Thrones canon. The priest he mentions is undoubtedly a red priest of R’hllor a.k.a. the sect of crimson sorcerers that Melisandre of Asshai belongs to. In hindsight, Ulf’s backstory feels so integral to his character that it would seem impossible to portray the boorish dragonseed without having access to it.

Thankfully, Bennett had all the access he needed. That’s because, before shooting his first scene on House of the Dragon‘s “Cock Inn” tavern set back in season 2, Bennett was approached by series showrunner Ryan Condal with a revealing document.

“Ryan took a sheet out of his folder and gave it to me,” Bennett tells Den of Geek and other outlets during a press roundtable. “He said ‘I’ve already written this, but I think it might be useful to you now. It’s kind of a monologue of yours.’ I read it and was like that’s so generous, because this really does inform everything. Like this here is your origin story. Now I can hang everything else off that.”

Bennett’s early knowledge of Ulf’s childhood imbues the moment with a gravitas that his scene partners were happy to play off of.

“It was useful for me as well because within that scene he’s revealing so much and being so honest, and then he asks Hugh about himself and Hugh chooses not to tell him anything,” Bew says.

“I was in awe of Tom as he just disappeared as Ulf in the scene, and it’s a particular way I’ve never seen Ulf before,” Liberty adds. “I started to see the humanity in him and kind of understand his perspective and why he is the way he is. And then a couple of takes later I had to obviously be professional and be Addam within the scene. But honestly, it caught me off guard how good he was. genuinely.”

It’s amazing the things you find out about your friends when waiting for a massive she-dragon that never comes.

New episodes of House of the Dragon season 3 premiere Sundays at 9 p.m. ET on HBO and HBO Max, culminating with the finale on August 9.

House of the Dragon Stars Break Down Season 3’s Battle of the Gullet

This article contains spoilers for House of the Dragon season 3 episode 1.

So-named for the narrow stretch of ocean between Driftmark and Dragonstone upon which it’s fought, the Battle of the Gullet is the biggest engagement in the Dance of the Dragons Targaryen civil war and remains one of the bloodiest sea battles ever fought in Westeros. And House of the Dragon has never been shy about making sure we all know it’s coming.

The second season finale of HBO’s Game of Thrones prequel put all the relevant players for the battle in motion. The Triarchy ships, led by flamboyant Lyseni commander Sharako Lohar (Abigail Thorn) and the reserved Ser Tyland Lannister (Jefferson Hall), were en route to Westeros to break the Velaryon fleet’s blockade of King’s Landing. That, combined with plenty of between-seasons teases, made it clear that conflict was imminent. Little did we know, however, just how imminent it would be.

The House of the Dragon season 3 premiere concludes with the Battle of the Gullet and it’s every bit as bloody and chaotic and promised. During a press table junket with a handful of other outlets, Den of Geek spoke to some of the skirmish’s key players about bringing a naval spectacle to life. Here is what we learned.

As one might expect, the Battle of the Gullet was a big logistical undertaking for the series. Showrunner Ryan Condal previously revealed that the shoot took multiple weeks and involved the creation of a full-scale model of Corlys Velaryon’s ship The Queen Who Never Was and a massive water tank. That attention to detail extended to lessons in the history of naval warfare for the actors.

“There was a gentleman there who I guess was an expert in historical nautical stuff. He would give us all these phrases to say. And yet my one disappointment actually was that there wasn’t a [steering] wheel. It’s just a stick that you have to sort of do that with,” Corlys Velaryon actor Steve Toussaint says, miming the pulling of a whipstaff.

While the experts were helpful in teaching Toussaint and his sailors about “starboard,” “larboard,” and various masts and knots, it turns out that a lot of that training immediately goes out the window in the heat of battle.

“You forget everything,” Alyn of Hull actor Abubakar Salim says. “It is literally just about survival. Is that person trying to kill me? I’ve got to kill them before they kill me. So that was a real fascinating thing to experience to – especially the way it was filmed and choreographed. It showed a very human side and a very ugly side to what battle is, no matter where it is.”

To further illustrate the point about the brutality of war – whether in land or sea – Salim expounds upon the experience of Alyn killing Sharako Lohar.

“Abigail is a force of nature. She was so great and so fantastic work with. But it was dark, man, like we went into a dark place. Originally we had choreographed this really cool fight. What ended up happening though was it just turned into this primal exhaustion. I drown her to her last breath and rather than have her last breath be snatched by the sea, I stab her in the neck. It was cruel.”

Of course, the Battle of the Gullet isn’t just naval warfare as both sides in the Dance of the Dragons have flying dragons and are eager to use them. Queen Rhaenyra’s eldest son and heir Jacaerys Velaryon (Harry Collett) enters the fray on the back of his dragon Vermax and is joined by his cousin/bride-to-be Baela Targaryen (Bethany Antonia) and her dragon Moondancer. If the presence of two dragons circling around battling ships weren’t chaotic enough, a third dragon arrives – the untamed Sheepstealer ridden by Baela’s sister and novice dragonrider Rhaena (Phoebe Campbell).

While the presence of Rhaena at the Gullet represents a diversion from George R.R. Martin’s Fire & Blood source material (something George famously loves), it does help explain how Jace’s dragon is taken down by the Triarchy’s ships. It’s not only that their sailors are particularly adept with Scorpion crossbows, it’s that Jace is understandably distracted by the introduction of an unfamiliar dragon who seems to be a foe. Rhaena’s inability to control Sheepstealer leads to Vermax and his rider being dragged down to the watery depths and killed. This makes Jacaerys actor Harry Collett the only Gullet combatant to experience the battle from both the air and the water. That combination led to a funny misunderstanding on set.

“I was wearing Jace’s dragonriding gloves in the scene and they reacted with the water and made my hands blue,” he says. “When I came out of the water tank, the medic ran over to me because my hands were so blue she thought I had hypothermia. But it was just the dye from the gloves.”

In the end, the Battle of the Gullet claims countless lives including some big name characters like Jacaerys, Lohar, and Tyland. With two more seasons of war to come, those at the bottom of the Gullet might consider themselves the lucky ones.

New episodes of House of the Dragon season 3 premiere Sundays at 9 p.m. ET on HBO and HBO Max, culminating in the finale on August 9.

House of the Dragon Cast Discuss Season 3 Premiere’s Brutal Death

This article contains spoilers for House of the Dragon season 3 episode 1.

Rhaenyra Targaryen is no stranger to the vulgarities of war. The Queen in Dragonstone and claimant to the Iron Throne received an education in what war really costs before her war even truly began.

Back in the House of the Dragon season 1 finale, Rhaenyra lost her second son Lucerys when he and his dragon Arrax were devoured by his cousin Aemond’s dragon Vhagar on what should have been a relatively safe diplomatic mission. It’s a devastating loss, to be sure. But thankfully Rhaenyra still has a host of other sons including her eldest and heir Jacaerys Velaryon.

So, about that…

Jacaerys meets his end in House of the Dragon season 3 episode 1. And like his younger brother before him, he perishes whilst riding his dragon Vermax. Rather than being swiftly consumed by a bigger dragon, however, Jace and Vermax’s demises are more tragically drawn out.

When the Triarchy’s fleet of ships arrives in a narrow Westeros waterway known as the Gullet, Jace locks his queen/mother away in a room for her own safety and takes off on dragonback alongside his cousin/step-sister/fiancée Baela to protect Corlys Velaryon’s navy. Unfortunately, the Triarchy has developed a rather ingenious strategy of dealing with dragons, harpooning Vermax in mid-air and then dragging him down into the water where the beast known to the Westerosi as “fire made flesh” drowns. Jace doesn’t last much longer than his dragon as he is quickly lit up with arrows and killed.

While we do not yet get to see how Rhaenyra responds to her oldest child’s death, her portrayer Emma D’Arcy believes that the moment represents a point of no return.

“I think for Rhaenyra, Jace’s death is an insurmountable loss, honestly. It’s unprocessable,” D’Arcy tells Den of Geek and other outlets during a press roundtable. “But I think grief actually sometimes simplifies things. It offers her a sort of nihilism in that final part of the journey.”

House of the Dragon will certainly look a lot different onscreen without the presence of Harry Collett as the raven-haired, not-so-secretly bastard-born prince. It will also look different for the performers offscreen as the show careens towards its fourth and final season.

“The relationships that we have on the show and the friendships that we form are very real. They’re friends of mine. There is always a life imitating art aspect to a character death because we lose a company member and so those days have an atmosphere necessarily,” D’Arcy says of Collett’s departure.

For his part, Collett is taking things in stride.

“Maybe I’ll have to leave [the cast group chat]. Can you imagine? It’s a really dramatic ‘Harry left the group chat,'” he says with a laugh, then continues: “I was told what would happen in season 1, so I’ve been preparing for this. I’ll always be grateful for being on this show in the first place. Ultimately I’ve had the best time ever and I got to travel the world because of it.”

Collett is also aware that, if your character destined to die in a Game of Thrones story, they might as well do so in style – on the back of a dragon and shot through with arrows certainly fits the bill.

“What a great way to go! I’m glad it just didn’t get, you know, brushed under the carpet. It’s a really impactful episode and it’s been done amazingly. I’m very, very happy.”

New episodes of House of the Dragon season 3 premiere Sundays at 9 p.m. ET on HBO and HBO Max, culminating with the finale on August 9.