Holiday Gift Guide: 7 Purrfect Presents For Feline Fanatics and Card Collectors This Gift Giving Season

This article is presented in partnership with Upper Deck.

Don’t pawcrastinate and wait until the last minute to get your cat-loving friends and family meowmbers their gifts this year. No one wants to be running around at the eleventh hour like a cat being chased by the dreaded vacuum cleaner! Save yourself the stress and purrchase these meowrvelous, I Can Has Cheezburger-approved gifts with plenty of time to spare so you can enjoy a cat nap or two as the hectic holiday season approaches.

Some people are really good at giving gifts, but I am not one of those people.

That’s why I Can Has Cheezburger is purrtnering up with Upper Deck to give you the most cat-tastic holiday gift guide. If you’re wondering what you’re supposed to give your cat-obsessed family member (don’t get them another cat toy, their cats never play with them), then let us introduce the All-Mew Feline Collection! These cute collectible cards feature all your favorite felines, from amber Abyssinians, to sultry Siamese cats, to meowjestic Maine Coons. 

Each one has the pawtential to be the purrfect gift for anyone who grew up loving trading cards and collecting the things they love most. Frame them, sleep with them under your pillow, do whatever you want with them, just don’t let your cats see them. They might get jealous that you’re looking at other (beautiful) cats. And nobody wants a cranky cat during the holidays.

Give the gift of kindness this holiday season by donating to our Giving Tuesday fundraiser to help homeless pets and animals in need! It’s time to pay your cat tax!

Upper Deck Feline Collection

Upper Deck has transformed your favorite cat breeds into pawsitively beautiful collectibles! Whether you’re a trading card collector who loves our feline friends or simply a cat lover, Upper Deck Feline Collection is a must-have set! Like cats themselves, this set is full of playfulness, attitude, hilarity and… cuteness to stunning beauty. It is also loaded with information and fun facts. These cute kitties are certainly the ultimate gift for any feline fanatic!

BUY NOW

Maine Coon Card Pack

Each pack comes with 6 meowgnificent cards inside. With multiple parallels & variations of each Base Set card and an insert lineup that really taps into what makes cats special, the options for feline fun are as endless as your cat’s love for Churus.

BUY NOW

Base Set 

The 100-card Base Set features 10 different cats from 10 different breeds: Abyssinian, Bengal, Exotic Shorthair, Maine Coon, Munchkin, Ragdoll, Russian Blue, Scottish Fold, Siamese, and Snowshoe.

Each card front boasts meowjestic images of the cats, while the card back features fun facts and information about each breed. Through this set, you can learn about the hisstoric origins of the breed, the name, and purrsonality traits. Each 10-card subset delivers a pawsome amount of information about the breed.

A Hobby Box comes with 12 packs, so this is truly the ultimate gift you could give this meowliday season!

BUY NOW

Insert Sets – Cat Beams!

You know what cats need? Moar lazers! Bring yourself back to the good old days of the early internet with some good old-fashioned cat craziness with these funny felines featuring amazing digital art, printed on lenticular stock. Once you see one, you’ll want all of them! 

BUY NOW

Insert Sets – Know Your Breed!

Want to take a deep dive into the feline species? These sets cover 40 different cat breeds – the same 10 from the Base Set and 30 new ones! What could they be, you ask? Well, you’ll have to purrchase them to find out! Expect more pawsome images and all the fun facts your cat-loving brain could pawssibly ask for.

BUY NOW

Insert Sets – Pop Cats

Pawp extravaganza! This 30-card Quad Pop Art set includes cards with four images of a cat, each in a different color, and each card back provides more information about the breed. 

As Andy Warhol once said, “Every cat is a work of pawp art,” or something like that.

BUY NOW

Insert Sets – Now Trending

Do you consider yourself an internet cat culture expurrt? If so, you may recognize some of these kitties! This “Now Trending” set features several of your most beloved internet-famous cats. Between the images and the information on the back, you’ll learn what helped get these special felines their social media following. 

BUY NOW







Avengers: Doomsday – Who Are Doctor Doom’s Latverian Witches?

This article contains spoilers for VisionQuest episode 8.

In a surprise to even those who had advanced screeners and wrote all of their reviews in good faith that they were being shown the entire show and are not at all grouchy about finding out that their articles are now wrong, VisionQuest ended with an unexpected post-credits scene. The scene picks up shortly after the end of Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness, where Scarlet Witch gets crushed on Mount Wundagore. In the new material, we look through Wanda’s point of view as the rubble lifts, courtesy of Doctor Doom’s magic. “Scarlet Witch, awaken… your power will be mine,” commands Doom, causing Wanda’s eyes to open suddenly.

The post-credits scene all but confirms a theory that has been bandied about on the internet since promotional materials for Avengers: Doomsday revealed Doom’s Latverian Witches, a trio of women whose faces are hidden under masks, each of which wearing uniquely color-coded robes. We can now assume that the one in scarlet is, indeed, the Scarlet Witch. But who are the witches in purple and green?

The Purple Witch

The purple-hued witch is most likely Clea, who we met back in Multiverse of Madness. If you only know Marvel from the movies, then you probably don’t remember Clea, since she has approximately one minute of screen time. But this will help: she’s the person Charlize Theron played in the post-credits scene, recruiting Strange to help deal with the problem of Incursions.

Clea is one of the most important magical characters in the Marvel Universe. The daughter of Prince Orini of the Dark Dimension and niece to the Dread Dormammu, Clea became the love interest of Doctor Strange shortly after her first appearance in 1964’s Strange Tales #126, by Steve Ditko and Stan Lee. And, like most female characters in Marvel Comics, she sometimes gets corrupted when she gains too much power. However, Clea has more recently been given a steady place in the Marvel Universe, becoming the Sorcerer Supreme in Strange’s place and helping to bring balance to several dimensions.

Of course, a big blockbuster like Doomsday would benefit from a surprise appearance by an A-lister like Theron. But Clea also makes sense on a narrative and adaptation level. In the 2015 Secret Wars storyline by Jonathan Hickman and Esad Ribić, Doctor Doom steals the powers of the godlike Beyonders to save the universe from destruction through Incursions. In the process, he remakes the world in his image, setting himself up as God Emperor and making the family of the despised Reed Richards—wife Sue Storm and children Franklin and Valeria—into his own family.

Although a handful of survivors escape Doom’s recreation and eventually arrive to fight against it, only one person within Doom’s world remembers what used to be: Stephen Strange, who sought the Beyonders alongside Doom, but hesitated to take the power. For that reason, Strange plays the role of the Sheriff of Agamotto in this world, a guilt-riddled collaborator who enforces the lie that Doom has always been God Emperor because doing so will keep the peace.

Although Benedict Cumberbatch was not one of the actors named in the infamous chair reveal video, it’s impossible to think that Strange won’t be involved in Doomsday in some capacity. And there has been a male figure dressed in brown and green alongside the Latverian Witches, also masked, who some have theorized is Doctor Strange. But why would Strange collaborate with this version of Doom, given that there are no Beyonders? The answer may be that Doom has captured Clea and turned her into one of his witches.

The Green Witch

Which brings us to the other witch, dressed in green. Initial theories suggested that the green Witch is Sylvie, a variant of Loki from his TV show. Sylvie has always had a reckless streak, and given the multversal nature of Doomsday, it would follow that someone who hops between realities would be of interest to Doom. And, of course, Sylvie wears green and gold, just like that of the Witch.

But green is also Doom’s preferred color scheme, which means that the Green Witch may be someone close to Doom, and here’s where things get interesting. In the comics, Doom learns magic from his mother Cynthia, and even teams with Doctor Strange to rescue her soul from Hell in the excellent 1989 graphic novel Triumph and Torment.

Perhaps, he has Cynthia alongside him in Doomsday. If that sounds harsh, you have to remember that Doom in the comics traded the soul of his beloved to the Devil in order to gain the power to destroy the Fantastic Four. That beloved was named Valeria, and she’s recently become a key character in Captain America comics about Steve Rogers fighting Doom, a plot point created to hype Doomsday. Could the Green Witch be Valeria, then?

Valeria is also the name of the third, and most compelling, possibility of the Green Witch’s identity. In the comics, Reed and Sue have two children. In addition to Franklin, who we met in Fantastic Four: First Steps, they have Valeria, a girl whose delivery almost killed Sue. Upon learning that only magic could save both Sue and the child, Doom offered his help, happy to succeed where Richards failed. He only had one requirement, that he name the child, who he christened after his lost love. Since then, Doom has been Valeria’s loving godfather.

Loving, that is, by Doom’s standards. We already have already seen Doom interacting with Franklin Richards in the post-credits scene of First Steps, and Doomsday seems to involve him kidnapping heroes’ children, including the son of Steve Rogers and Peggy Carter, as well as Thor’s daughter Love. Even though Valeria Richards favors science over magic, and does not have her brother Franklin’s vast mutant abilities, Doom may age her up and make her one of his witches, if only to hold sway over Reed.

The Season of the Witches

Perhaps the biggest question of all is why Doom has these Witches in the first place. Given all the talk about Incursions and heroes from other realities in films from the past three MCU phases, we can tell that Doomsday draws in part from the Secret Wars comic arc.

Are the Witches the replacement for the abilities of the Beyonder and the all-powerful Molecule Man, who help Doom remake reality in the comics? Or do they serve a more sinister, personal purpose? Recent trailers for Doomsday have suggested that this version of Doom turns evil after losing his family. That family connection tracks not just with his interacting with Franklin in First Steps, but also with his decision to resurrect Wanda—a mother willing to destroy the world for her children—to be one of his Witches.

And that brings us to the most terrifying possibility, that the Green Witch is Sue Storm. Like Valeria, Sue doesn’t have magical powers, but she is quite formidable. Moreover, Sue represents for Doom everything that Reed has and he does not, which is why he made Sue his wife in the Secret Wars storyline. Finally, making Sue the Green Witch would fit within the familial theme we’ve seen, with Doom getting his own stolen life to make up for the one he lost.

We can’t say for sure, but we’ll learn the truth soon. Because Doomsday is almost here.

Avengers: Doomsday releases in theaters on December 18, 2026.

In The Rings of Power Season 3, Gandalf Investigates a Longstanding Tolkien Mystery

The following contains spoilers for the first four episodes of The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power season 3 episodes 1-4.

It took The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power two seasons to finally confirm the worst-kept secret in fantasy television: The mysterious man known as The Stranger—who had an affinity for elemental magic, halflings, and quotes made famous onscreen by Sir Ian McKellen—was, in fact, Gandalf the Grey. But, finally freed from the multi-season deception required to mask his identity, the character gets the chance to come into his own this season, and, in doing so, his story ventures into some heretofore unexplored corners of J.R.R. Tolkien’s fictional universe.

Gandalf’s journey takes him into the eastern kingdom of Rhûn, a land that Tolkien’s writings left largely unexplored and mysterious. (The idea of “The East” in Middle-earth is normally used as code for something that’s very far away.) The human race there, known as the Easterlings, fell under the dominion of Morgoth and later Sauron, but outside of Khamûl the Easterling, one of Tolkien’s two named Nazgûl, we know very little about them or their culture. The Rings of Power set about changing that last season, and takes it even further, offering a possible explanation for one of the most longstanding mysteries of Tolkien’s world: The fate of the Blue Wizards. 

“The idea of the Blue Wizards who went East is such a tantalizing, deep corner of the lore,” showrunner Patrick McKay tells Den of Geek. ”We always wanted to go out to Rhûn, and we always wanted to explore that story, but we also wanted to [do it] through a familiar face. The idea of Gandalf going there on that journey was always appealing to us, and we always knew that it was going to go this way, and then hook back into the main narrative. We trusted the audience would go with us for really three seasons for that to happen. And we hope the payoff is worth it to them.”

One of the few things we do know about Rhûn is that at some point Saruman the White and two of the other Istari—the Maiar spirits sent to Middle-earth to aid in the fight against Sauron—journeyed east, ostensibly to convince the Easterlings to resist the machinations of the Dark Lord. They’re known only as the Blue Wizards, though Tolkien’s Unfinished Tales confirms their names as Alatar and Pallando. In The Rings of Power’s third episode, “The Secret Fire,” it is revealed that Ciarán Hinds’ initially unnamed Dark Wizard is one of them; a surprising narrative swerve from the direction many viewers likely assumed the story was going. (Look, we all thought Hinds’ general Christopher Lee impression was because he was Saruman. Sometimes, it’s nice to be wrong!)

The Dark Wizard’s true name is Pallando, and he is not only one of the Blue Wizards, but it turns out that he betrayed and murdered his partner in the name of claiming power for himself. Gandalf learns this shocking fact courtesy of a casual conversation with the Secret Fire, a divine manifestation of Eru Ilúvatar, the Tolkien universe’s stand-in for God. (There’s a reason its depiction has real “Moses and the burning bush” vibes.) We’ll leave the questions about the wild convenience of Gandalf’s sudden celestial communication for another day, but the gist of it is that not only has Pallando broken a sacred rule of his order and fallen into Shadow, but his actions were so evil that they “laid all of Rhûn to waste.”

But although Gandalf immediately wants to know how he is meant to defeat him, that is not his mission. Instead, he is charged with saving Pallando and, in doing so, saving Middle-earth. It’s a surprising twist, but one that feels perfectly in tune with the Gandalf we know from much later in his story. He is, after all, the one who will praise Bilbo’s pity in sparing Gollum’s life, and remind us that we should never be too quick to deal out death in judgment because even the very wise cannot see all ends. It’s perhaps the most Gandalf-coded plot twist possible. But, according to the man who plays the famous wizard, Gandalf’s journey this season isn’t about him magically saving the day, but offering folks a chance to do it themselves. 

“Maybe it’s not saving him, which feels very much like [an] “I’m going to save somebody” [attitude]. Maybe it’s just reflecting to him that there was still goodness in [him],” Daniel Weyman says. “Maybe all Gandalf does is show people what they have inside that they’ve forgotten about. Maybe Gandalf shows them that their hearts are still warm, [when] they had thought that they were irredeemable. I even like to go a step further to say that it’s not about Gandalf saving somebody; it’s about the Dark Wizard saving himself. It just so happens that he’s got a friend on the journey, and that’s Gandalf.”

For McKay, this sidequest in Rhûn is an important piece of Gandalf’s evolution as a character, and something that the character needed to do before (one presumes, eventually) joining up with the series’ main action. 

“The idea that Gandalf’s story in season 3 would be [a question] of how does he supersize his magic powers or [how does he] defeat the magic whatever, no, no, no,” McKay says. “His story’s about learning what his real mission is, and his real mission is to inspire hearts. That’s a Tolkien thing. It couldn’t be a bigger Tolkien idea. The question is, has he picked the wrong one or not? Is Ciarán Hinds’ Dark Wizard redeemable? You have to see the finale to find out.”

The first four episodes of The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power are available to stream on Prime Video now. Two new episodes premiere on November 18 and November 25.

15 Men Share Their Hardest Part of Being a Husband

Marriage comes with plenty of wonderful moments, but nobody really prepares you for the parts that can test your patience, energy, and emotional strength. Being a husband means navigating countless little responsibilities, difficult conversations, unexpected challenges, and compromises that aren’t always easy to explain. Some men struggle with communication, others feel overwhelmed by family life, and a few have discovered that even deciding what to eat for dinner can become a surprisingly exhausting task. When married men were asked about the hardest part of being a husband, their answers revealed some pretty honest, funny, and occasionally heartbreaking experiences.

Learning to Listen Without Trying to Fix Everything

“I have to remind myself that sometimes she just wants me to listen, not come up with a solution to whatever went wrong that day.”

Supporting Her When You’re Struggling Too

“The hardest part is putting my own problems aside when we’re both having a rough time, because sometimes I need support just as much as she does.”

Having the Same Conversation Over and Over

“I can discuss a problem, figure out what we’re going to do, and move on, but sometimes we end up talking about the exact same thing several times a week, and it gets emotionally exhausting.”

Deciding What to Eat Every Single Day

“Figuring out what we’re having for dinner is a never ending responsibility, and somehow I have to make that decision over and over for the rest of my life.”

Feeling Like You Always Have to Be Funny

“My wife is so far out of my league that I feel like I have to be hilarious all the time just to keep up.”

Making Sure You Never Stop Dating Your Wife

“You have to keep communicating and dating each other through every stage of life, because it’s easy to let kids, work, and responsibilities take over your marriage.”

Knowing That One Day You’ll Lose Her

“I’m 62 and have been with my wife for 39 years, and the hardest part is knowing that eventually one of us will have to finish this journey without the other.”

Watching Your Wife Do Things You Can No Longer Do

“Since becoming disabled, watching my wife take care of everything I used to do myself is incredibly difficult, and I miss even the simplest things, like walking the dogs or cutting the lawn.”

Feeling Completely Unappreciated

“Sometimes the hardest part is feeling like everything I do goes unnoticed and nobody really appreciates the effort.”

Never Knowing What the Expectations Are Anymore

“The goalposts are always moving, and just when I think I’ve figured out what I’m supposed to do, the expectations seem to change again.”

Feeling Like You’re Never Allowed to Be Tired

“No matter how exhausted I am, I feel like I’ll never be as tired as my wife, so I shouldn’t even bother complaining about it.”

Finding Time for Your Wife After Having Kids

“Between working and raising children, finding time for my wife takes actual planning, because if we’re not intentional about it, we eventually risk becoming strangers.”

Having Your Entire Life Revolve Around Everyone Else

“Sometimes it feels like my entire life is based around everybody else’s needs and wants, and there’s very little time left for myself.”

Putting More Effort Into Her Hobbies Than She Does Into Yours

“I’ve trained for a half marathon with her and made an effort to enjoy the things she loves, but I still wish she’d show some interest in the hobbies that make me happy.”

Trying to Be Good at Every Role You Have to Play

“You’re constantly wearing ten different hats as a husband and father, and somehow you’re expected to be good at every single one of them.”

Victorian Psycho: How Maika Monroe Drew on Ted Bundy and Nicolas Cage for That Scary Smile

Director Zachary Wigon was already in Ireland scouting locations when Maika Monroe was cast in the role of Winifred Notty, the eponymous (and positively deranged) protagonist of Victorian Psycho. As befits her film’s title, Winifred is doleful in that way distinct to 19th century literary heroines; she has a penchant for walking along English moors and woodlands; and she’s absolutely, deliriously batshit unhinged when she gets her hands on axes, knives, or just an earnest young charge who she warns should call her Fred.

“Fred is not a lady’s name!” the child incredulously replies to his governess. “But Fred is the name of the demon that lives inside me,” she sweetly answers back before snuffing out the lad’s lonely, flickering candle.

For Monroe it’s one of the most daring high-wire acts of her career thus far, a character she describes as miles away from many of her traditional protagonists and real-life inclinations, perhaps better represented by the resolute and haunted FBI Agent Lee Harker in Longlegs, or the seemingly doomed, sensitive soul who contracts a supernatural disease in It Follows. And as she tells us on the eve of Victorian Psycho’s release, “A lot of the roles that I have done in the past are a bit more internal, and this was really having to go for it in a very external physical performance. So that was nerve-wracking, for sure, because it was absolutely out of my comfort zone.”

Hence the Zoom calls with her director, which led to the pair workshopping facial tics, frenzied movements, and the type of bold choices that harken back to an almost silent, expressionistic era of acting. “We had so much fun because we would be doing different crazy faces and body [contortions],” Monroe adds. “And then there was the one look I had where my eyes are rolled back, and I just remember, Zach went, ‘That’s it! That was it!’”

If you’ve seen the Victorian Psycho trailer, you already know the countenance: a slanted posture, a lowered brow, and a crooked smile portending ill intent.

“She was cycling through,” says Wigon with a wry smirk of his own, “She was like a slot machine, and Maika’s face would suddenly be like this and then that, and I’m watching [before saying] That one! Stop!”

It’s a big swing and one that pays off in the way certain movie maniacs of yore have entered the public consciousness. Victorian Psycho is not shy about its influences either, with a title echoing Anthony Perkins in Alfred Hitchcock’s Psycho (1960) or Christian Bale in Mary Harron’s American Psycho (2000). It was one of the initial appeals for Wigon when author Virginia Feito sent a first draft of her Victorian Psycho manuscript to Wigon to read. He agreed to give notes on it as a favor for a friend, but he proved so captivated by the novel that he encouraged Feito to also turn it into a screenplay, not least of all because it offered a female performance the fun of cinematic madness.

“One of the pleasures of the movie is being able to see a character who is typically in a caretaker role,” says Wigon. “You think about the governess role and obviously you think about The Innocents. It’s this woman’s role to take care of these children—one of the pleasures of the movie is the kind of intense, unnerving quality you get from recognizing that this character, who is serving that function, is actually the threat this time.”

Even the outre nature of Monroe’s choices echo the type of real-world horrors that are usually associated with men.

Wigon notes, “There was this video I sent Maika where this forensic psychologist is breaking down an interview that Ted Bundy gave, and basically the forensic psychologist will pause the video every minute or a couple of minutes, and they’ll talk about what he’s doing with his facial tics and expressions and gestures, how these things are cutting against what he’s actually saying in the course of the interview. We had these kinds of conversations that maybe was the germination of what Maika was then able to embody in all these wonderful, physical ideas that she brought to the table.”

It’s a choice that has earned Monroe raves out of genre-leaning festivals like Fantastic Fest, and comparisons to another actor who draws heavily on silent and expressionistic cinema, her Longlegs co-star Nicolas Cage.

Says Monroe, “He’s one of my favorite actors because I think all his choices are so interesting. You even see him in a rom-com, and I can’t take my eyes off of him because he’s so intriguing, and that was a definite influence for this character.” The star even seems to take special pleasure in comparisons to her performance and what Cage did in Vampire’s Kiss nearly 40 years ago.

Still, it’s a film designed to reflect the era it is set in, and the tension between expectation and being true to thine own (dark) self.

“So many of the beliefs of that era are so wild to think about now and were widely accepted at the time,” Wigon considers. “The first thing I always think about is that the Victorians believed that women couldn’t exercise too much because if they did, their uterus might fall out. That was one of the beliefs that they held at this time.” It’s a notion his leading lady mirthlessly chuckles “really sticks with ya.”

But in that context, the movie’s dark comedy becomes about a friction, or as the director says, “a dance between two aspects that’s essential to every moment of violence: you feel her trying to hold back the tide before it unleashes.” That delayed release, and the gratification that comes afterward, is its own kind of psychotherapy.

Victorian Psycho goes berserk in cinemas beginning on Friday, Nov. 13.

VisionQuest Finale: Episode 8 Post-Credits Scene Sets Up A Major Return in Avengers: Doomsday

This article contains spoilers for VisionQuest episode 8… and Avengers: Doomsday, believe it or not.

The VisionQuest has completed. Let the Children’s Crusade begin. Although billed as the third entry in a trilogy that includes WandaVision and Agatha All Along, VisionQuest has mostly felt pretty distinct from those two shows, which put Wanda Maximoff in the center. However, with its finale, Vision and Wanda’s two sons finally reunite, albeit in different bodies, when Billy Kaplan a.k.a. Wiccan and Tommy Shepherd a.k.a. Speed connect via magic.

Seeing the two together is obviously good news for fans of the Young Avengers, as the two mainstays on Marvel’s teen team will certainly soon be recruited by Kamala Khan, who began her membership drive at the end of The Marvels. But it’s even better news for fans of Wanda Maximoff, as the duo’s connection, and a potential plot point in Avengers: Doomsday, mirrors the comic book story that finally brought the Scarlet Witch back to the side of the angels, Avengers: The Children’s Crusade.

And in fact, an unexpected post-credits scene in the VisionQuest finale confirms that Wanda will return in Avengers: Doomsday! [Ed Note: Said post-credits scene was not included in the advanced screener of the episode for the press… which we hope explains some of the breathless “Marvel did what??? OK let me fire up my laptop” tone of portions of this article].

The post-credits moment replays a critical scene from the climax of 2022’s Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness in which Wanda brings down the walls of Mount Wundagore, destroying all copies of the Darkhold throughout the Multiverse but also sacrificing herself in the process. The scene then continues with new footage as Robert Downey Jr.’s Doctor Doom approaches Wanda’s corpse in the rubble. “Scarlet Witch, awaken,” he rumbles in his thick Latverian accent. “Your powers will be mine.”

Sure enough the Scarlet Witch does awaken and we have every reason to believe that her powers will be Doom’s.

So what can we make of this wild footage? Will the Scarlet Witch be in thrall to Victor Von Doom in Avengers: Doomsday? Thankfully, the pages of Marvel comics provide plenty of clues.

Written by Allan Heinberg and penciled by Jim Cheung, the creators of the Young Avengers, Avengers: The Children’s Crusade was published in nine issues released between 2010 and 2012, and had major ramifications for the rest of the Marvel Universe. In order to understand those ramifications, we have to look back at the Scarlet Witch’s status in the Marvel Universe at the time. Initially introduced as a relatively sheepish character with the power to give people bad luck, the Scarlet Witch had grown in strength over the years, especially under the tutelage of Agatha Harkness—a mysterious but benevolent old woman in the comics, unlike the spunky trouble-maker in the MCU.

With the greater power came bouts of madness, first when Tommy and Billy were taken from her and their souls reabsorbed into the evil Mephisto. To prevent Wanda from becoming overwhelmed by grief and turning evil, her memories of the twins were wiped away. But many years later, the memories returned, and she broke down again. Worse, this break came with a full understanding that the “Chaos Magic” she seemed to be using was, in fact, the ability to change reality.

Now both incredibly powerful and mad with grief, Wanda first destroys the Avengers, killing Ant-Man Scott Lang and the Jack of Hearts in the process. Then, she depowers nearly every mutant in the Universe, this after creating an alternate reality that wreaks havoc on several heroes.

In short, Wanda was persona non-grata in the eyes of even her closest friends when Billy Kaplan a.k.a. Wiccan reveals the ability to change reality during a Young Avengers mission. At this point, no one was certain that Billy Kaplan was the reformed Billy Maximoff, but such an incredible feat raised suspicions, not only in Billy, Tommy a.k.a. Speed, and the other Young Avengers, but in the mainline Avengers as well, who did not want to see Wanda’s history repeat itself.

What initially happens is what happened a lot in crossovers involving the Avengers: Captain America becomes an authoritarian cop and he and the Earth’s Mightiest Heroes clamp down on anything that seems like a threat, even when good guys are involved. But for our purposes, the important thing is what Wiccan and Speed decide to do, now that they realize that they’re the reincarnated children of the Vision and the Scarlet Witch: they’re going to find their mother and rescue her.

With the conflicted help of Stature a.k.a. Cassie Lang, who had to work through her resentment at Wanda for killing her father, the twins discover that Wanda is being held by Doctor Doom, who is channeling her magical abilities. Against the wishes of the Avengers, the Young Avengers launch an attack on Doom’s country Latveria, where they manage to find and free Wanda—but at the cost of Stature’s life.

The Children’s Crusade was certainly convoluted, something not helped by its delayed release schedule. But it did manage to begin the rehabilitation of Wanda Maximoff, moving her from the villain she had become in the 2000s back into being a hero. By showing her to be victimized by Doctor Doom, by letting readers see her through the eyes of her sons, and, to be frank, by making the Avengers seem like a bunch of uncharitable jerks, The Children’s Crusade reminded us that Wanda had much good in her, and had done much good. It opened the possibility that she could do good again.

Now that VisionQuest has finished, it’s not hard to see the parallels between the comic book Wanda and the MCU Wanda. The MCU Wanda also went mad because of her children, turning into a full villain in Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness. Yet, as seen throughout Agatha All Along and VisionQuest, Vision, and especially Billy and Tommy see that there’s good in her, that her incredibly difficult life has forced her to make terrible choices. Now that the rest of the family has come together again, it would make sense for them to find her Wanda and free her from whatever suffering she’s enduring.

Where might that place of suffering be? In the comics, that was the court of Doctor Doom in his country, Latveria. The same might be true of the MCU. Not only will Doctor Doom and Latveria figure heavily into the next MCU entry Avengers: Doomsday, but some promotional material has raised our interest. In stills and posters, we’ve seen that Doom has a trio of Latverian witches, all masked but each wearing robes of a different color. One witch wheres purple, another blue, and the last red. Or should we say scarlet?

Could Avengers: Doomsday be following the lead of The Children’s Crusade and having Doom capture Wanda, using her power for his own ends? Dark as such a fate may be for Wanda Maximoff, it may be the way that Vision, Wiccan, and Speed can bring the Scarlet Witch back, making into the hero we’ve always wanted her to be.

Every episode of VisionQuest is now streaming on Disney+.

VisionQuest Episode 8 Finale Review: Worthwhile Revival Television

This article contains spoilers for VisionQuest season 1 episode 8.

Early in the VisionQuest finale “Forever,” our big bad Virgil Horton, points out that his grandfather Phineas’ error in creating a flaming robot called the Human Torch is so infamous, that “You Horton’d it” has become a colloquialism for making a mistake. It’s a broad, goofy line, one that recalls the bit in Community about “pulling a Britta,” and it’s just one of many instances of “Forever” embracing TV tropes. This is the climax of a Marvel TV show, so of course, we’ll have a showdown between Vision and Ultron, of course, Paladin will get a new status quo, and of course, we’ll get a set-up for future stories, namely the Young Avengers.

But VisionQuest isn’t just a Marvel series. It’s also the close of a trilogy that includes WandaVision and Agatha All Along, two shows deeply indebted to the medium of television. As such, “Forever” embraces television tropes not just because it is itself a television show, but because it’s part of a metaconversation about the nature of television. Through this metaconversation, “Forever” actually reverses the greatest weakness of WandaVision and establishes VisionQuest as one of the best Marvel TV shows ever made.

Let’s get the plot stuff out of the way first: the client who hired Paladin to find Vision is also the mysterious sixth member of Jo Carrington’s research group, Virgil Horton (played by James Spader, of course, but looking a lot like John Hodgman). Horton used the code left to him by his grandfather Phineas to create artificial intelligence, finally redeeming his family name. And before her physical death, Virgil transferred the consciousness of his wife Josephine Carrington into a metallic body, the body that would be Jocasta.

Now that he has Jo back and now that he has Vision’s body, Virgil plans to upload his consciousness into Vision so that he and Jo can rule over a humanity made docile by the nanonbots in the Nest. Together, then, they can enjoy, in Ultron’s words, “peace in our time.” Speaking of Ultron, Virgil has trapped the evil AI in a tiny little box (a nice nod to Ultron’s original, smaller forms in the pages of Avengers comics). But when Thomas—now calling himself Tommy and dressed similar to his superhero character Speed—uses his super speed to free Vision and Jocasta. Jocasta dies in the ensuring fracas, but not before Ultron gets free, takes control of the nanobots to return to his robot form, and squeezes Virgil to death.

Mad with grief over Jocasta’s death, Ultron decides to end humanity once and for all, forcing Vision to stop him. Vision has on his side not just his team of AIs, but also a reformed Paladin, Lisa, and Tommy, the last one having been re-energized by his meeting with Billy (Joe Locke, reprising his role from Agatha All Along). In other words, we’ve got all the characters we met along the way, getting together to fight a big bad who has always been pulling the strings.

The same thing happened in Agatha All Along and especially WandaVision, to the latter’s enormous detriment. For as much as WandaVision broke all expectations for superhero television by becoming a commentary on the history of TV, it famously ended with Wanda and Agatha shooting multi-colored lights at each other while Vision and White Vision fly around in the sky. The climax left a huge, unsightly asterisk on an otherwise fantastic season of TV.

So it’s refreshing and exhilarating that Ultron and Vision only trade a few punches before “Forever” changes approach. Vision traps Ultron on a sitcom called UltraVision, about a grouchy old dad (Ultron, of course) forced to move back in with his son (Vision) and his wacky friend (E.D.I.T.H.) after the death of his wife (Jocasta). Director Terry Matalas, who also scripts the final episode, perfectly captures sitcom stylization, from the muted sound design and laugh track, to the TGIF font and jaunty theme song (“Don’t kill the world!”). The gags are deliciously lame, and Bettany slips easily back into doofy dad mode, as does Spader (who really should do more sitcoms; it’s been too long since The Office).

However, the sitcom stylings are only a mode, set-up for the true nature of the conflict: a philosophical conversation between Vision and Ultron. On the surface, Vision does little more than urge Ultron to show mercy and to call off the nanobots he’s unleashing on the world. Vision designed the entire sitcom premise to force Ultron to process his grief over the loss of Jocasta, one more reminder that humanity is a self-destructive plague, before he could send out the nanobots. So the two spend time discussing the loss that always comes with love, the impossibility of shielding one’s self from hurt, and the fact that our identifies are always tied up with others, even people who hurt us—an observation signaled by the name of the fictional show, UltraVision.

Occasionally, the episode does cut to the big, high-stakes images you’d expect from a superhero show, a CGI nanoswarm covering a CGI city. And it does end with nods toward future stories, with Paladin taking on a new, more heroic mission, while Tommy and Billy make plans to search for Wanda.

But none of that takes away from the episode’s greatest special effect, which is also the greatest special effect in VisionQuest as a series: Paul Bettany and James Spader. Earlier in the season, the two great actors sometimes overwhelmed the weak dramatic material with their larger-than-life screen presences. But here, with the emotional stakes in focus, they lend their prowess to their characters, and make these artificial beings believably sad, believably human.

And so, VisionQuest finally redeems the mistakes of WandaVision. It stays true to what it has been all season long, not abandoning its core principles to satisfy genre demands at the end. Its highs are never as great as those of WandaVision (though it does outdo Agatha All Along). But VisionQuest ends on such a strong note that it establishes itself as a worthy follow-up to WandaVision, and a great superhero series in its own right.

All of VisionQuest is now streaming on Disney+.

The Future of Mass Effect Is Bigger Than Just Games

On October 21 of this year, Mass Effect fans were sent reeling by the news that EA decided to shutter studio BioWare, meaning that the beloved sci-fi gaming franchise – alongside DragonAge and who knows how many future projects – were brought to an end. In the weeks since the announcement, fans and actors associated with Mass Effect have launched an online campaign to try and make sure the series lives on. Those fans are in luck, as Prime Video is still slated to bring a Mass Effect TV project to life. A recent report from IGN confirmed that the series is still in development at Prime Video, despite BioWare’s closure. 

Those fans will also be happy to learn that a wealth of creative talent is helping bring Mass Effect to a medium that it’s always been a great fit for. The writing team includes Doug Jung and Dan Casey, who are no stranger to blockbuster franchises; Jung co-wrote Star Trek Beyond a.k.a. the height of Star Trek’s “Kelvin Timeline” trilogy, and Casey is involved with the Fast and Furious franchise. This all hints that Mass Effect will bring the same sense of character development and galaxy spanning action to television that made the games so beloved.

Perhaps the most promising creative avenue the series is taking is the decision to set its story after the events of the original Mass Effect trilogy, which opens up so many storytelling possibilities. Some fans feared that a Mass Effect movie or television show would try to recapture the story of the original games, which would take away the element of choice that makes Mass Effect so great.

Former BioWare exec Mike Gamble put it best on his personal blog in 2025: “The writers room is going strong, and we’ve got a lot figured out about how it fits within the Mass Effect canon, and where it sits in respect to the new game. The show will explore a brand-new story within the universe’s timeline, and will be set after the original trilogy. It won’t be a retread of Commander Shepard’s story – because after all … that’s YOUR story, isn’t it?”

That makes sense, especially given how Mass Effect 3 ended. No matter what choice Commander Shepard makes concerning the Crucible, the fallout will destroy the “mass relays” that allow interstellar travel, effectively altering the state of the universe. Jung, Casey, and the creative team have a new story to explore, and a way to bring in new characters that have been positively or negatively affected by Shepard’s decision.

By keeping Mass Effect in development, Prime Video is hoping to capture the same magic that made Fallout a huge hit (ditto for the upcoming God of War series). But it’s also carrying the future of an entire franchise on its shoulders. If Prime Video plays its cards right, the legacy of Mass Effect will live on and give fans a new story that builds upon their beloved games.

What Marvel Television Can Learn from the ‘WandaVision’ Trilogy

Tonight marks the finale of VisionQuest, and the end of an era for Marvel Television. VisionQuest isn’t just wrapping up a trilogy that began with WandaVision and Agatha All Along; it also marks a shift in Marvel Television’s storytelling strategy. Next year will mark the end of Daredevil: Born Again, while 2028 will debut an entirely new series, Zodiac (which some fans believe will be the long-awaited resurrection of Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.). Now that Marvel Television is shifting gears, it should look to the WandaVision trilogy for inspiration with its future efforts.

For starters, don’t forget that some of the lesser-known characters in Marvel’s stable can anchor some truly compelling stories. WandaVision works because it centers on Wanda Maximoff’s grief over losing Vision, and the actions she takes to recover her loved ones – and how the fallout of those actions affect others’ lives. Agatha All Along follows in those footsteps, using the Witches’ Road as a way for Agatha Harkness to come to terms with the wicked actions she’s committed over her many years. VisionQuest has been a “quest” for identity, showcasing Paul Bettany’s Vision recovering his memories, his emotions, and most importantly, his family.

These moments prove that Marvel doesn’t always have to lean on explosive fight scenes to deliver great stories. Part of the reason why Marvel Studios became a pop culture juggernaut, and led to the development of WandaVision and other television series, is because it put in the work to make these lesser known characters resonate with the audiences. Considering television is a weekly investment, it’s a lesson that the higher ups – particularly Marvel’s television/animation/comics head Brad Winderbaum – should keep in mind.

WandaVision, Agatha All Along, and VisionQuest also haven’t been shy about wearing their comic book inspirations on their sleeves. Whether it’s the Darkhold, the cursed book of spells that warps people’s souls, in WandaVision; the appearance of ‘J.I.M.” – or as comics fans better known him, Jim Hammond (a.k.a. the original Human Torch) in VisionQuest; or Lady Death herself in Agatha All Along, these elements make for a richer story and remind viewers that they’re traveling into a world of monsters, mutants, and marvels. If Zodiac is really bringing back elements from Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D., it should definitely bring back some of the superpowered characters – particularly Chloe Bennet as Daisy Johnson/Quake.

Perhaps the strongest element that’s made the WandaVision trilogy stand out is that most of its installments are building upon previous MCU events, rather than setting the stage for future movies. While Wanda and Vision’s children Tommy and Billy eventually evolve into their comic book counterparts Speed and Wiccan, the focus is less on whether they’ll join the Young Avengers and more about rediscovering their identities. 

VisionQuest shows Vision dealing with the fallout of WandaVision, and the messiness of human emotion, not to mention his own homicidal “father figure” in Ultron. WandaVision came close to hitting those same heights, until Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness decided to have Wanda go full villain and cast aside the more complex character traits that made her series so compelling.

Ironically, Marvel might have hit upon a formula for success in its animated shows. X-Men ‘97, Your Friendly Neighborhood Spider-Man, What If…?, Eyes of Wakanda, and Marvel Zombies have managed to be standalone stories that embrace the sheer comic booky goodness that makes Marvel’s characters worth watching. It doesn’t take tapping into chaos magic or a collection of artificial intelligences to see that Zodiac and future Marvel shows should tap into that energy. And the so-called “WandaVision trilogy” leaves behind a compelling blueprint for how to do so in live action.

DC’s Dismantling Could Be the End of Shared Universes

It’s been an interesting 24 hours in the world of superhero movies, with not just the news that James Gunn and Peter Safran have been removed as co-heads of DC Studios, but also with information about their dismissal coming clear. Initially, Gunn’s post to social media made it sound like he and Safran willingly stepped down from their position, certainly (but not explicitly) in response to Warner Bros.‘ new ownership under Paramount boss David Ellison, who will combine the two studios into a new company called Skydance. However, a more in-depth article from The Hollywood Reporter reveals that Gunn and Safran were pushed out, in part because they had autonomy over DC Studios projects.

Further complicating things is a report from Hollywood insider Matthew Belloni, who stated in his “What I’m Hearing” newsletter that he has been told “plans are already afoot to dismantle much of what Gunn and Safran had plotted out.” In other words, the DCU is rebooting… again. This at the same time the MCU is offering ‘memberberries in Avengers: Doomsday before what also might be a reboot in Avengers: Secret Wars. This could very well spell the end of shared universes.

Hard as it might be to believe now, The Avengers seemed like a risky gamble back in 2012. Sure, Universal Monsters and characters from Godzilla had crossed over before, but the idea of several characters introduced in different moves coming together in a single film seemed like a huge risk. Observers couldn’t believe that moviegoers would go to The Avengers if they hadn’t already seen Thor or Captain America: The First Avenger, both hits but hardly cultural phenomena. They couldn’t understand how a traditional story could be told with three different characters who had previously been leads in their own films. And how could a movie generate enough box office revenue to pay for such a thing?

Turns out, they were wrong. For a while, anyway. The Avengers was a smash hit, and the Marvel Cinematic Universe reigned supreme for the next decade. Not only did moviegoers turn out for big, tent pole Avengers films. But they also signed up to watch B-listers like Ant-Man and Doctor Strange, all with the hopes of catching up for the next big movie.

Yet, observers were right at the same time. For as much as the MCU succeeded, every other shared universe that studios tried to create fell flat. There was Universal‘s pitiful Dark Universe, which consisted officially only of the Tom Cruise picture The Mummy. There were Sony’s multiple attempts to create a universe around Spider-Man, often without Spider-Man’s involvement. There were Paramount‘s attempts to create a Transformers and G.I. Joe universe. And there was, of course, the DCEU.

Yes, the DCEU made money, partially because of devotees of architect Zack Snyder‘s style, partially because of the big names of characters involved, and partially because superheroes were in. But by the time Snyder’s tenure ended and Gunn and Safran took over, enthusiasm had waned, as demonstrated by the lackluster response to the return of Henry Cavill‘s Superman in Black Adam.

Gunn and Safran’s regime didn’t entirely restore that enthusiasm. Yes, Superman did well at the box office and Lanterns had great streaming numbers, but Supergirl was a flop and Creature Commandos and Peacemaker had limited appeal.

Of course, all of this comes at the same time that no one seems terribly interested in superheroes. Even quite good MCU outings like Thunderbolts* failed to break the box office, and Disney+ series such as Daredevil: Born Again are met largely with shrugs. But that only proves the larger point that the dominance of the MCU in the 2010s and the public thirst for all things weird and wacky in superhero movies has passed.

At this point, we still don’t know what the DCU under new head Jeremy Latcham will look like. However, it seems likely that he’ll focus on A-listers instead of the C- and D-listers that Gunn and Safran prioritized, movies about Batman and Superman instead of Clayface and Supergirl. Those big names will certainly pull in more viewers than the niche offerings.

But will moviegoers be interested in a third iteration of Superman and the Justice League, right after they got used to David Corenswet instead of Cavill? Will MCU fans return after the reunion tour that is Doomsday has ended, and Secret Wars introduces a new Black Panther, if not also new Tony Stark and Steve Rogers, as some have posited?

Probably not. Even in the age of superhero hype, reboots are a hard sell for the general public. In this period of superhero fatigue, it’s unthinkable. And so, shared universes will fade away from the public consciousness and go back to the world of comic books, which is probably where they’ve always belonged.

Ebenezer: Ti West on Johnny Depp, the Freddy Krueger Homage and a ‘Gray’ Scrooge You Can Agree With

Ti West knew he wanted to do something different. After writing and directing a decades-spanning trilogy of horror and cinematic homages via X, Pearl, and MaXXXine—films that count Martin Scorsese among their fans—the New England filmmaker needed to step away from the genre. If perhaps by only a few inches.

“Everybody loves IP, and I was like, ‘Well, what IP do I really love?’” West muses when we catch up with the filmmaker while he’s on a whirlwind press tour for Ebenezer, a thoroughly reimagined take on Charles Dickens’ classic A Christmas Carol. By virtue of the film he’s promoting, it’s obvious where his nostalgia took him, albeit the filmmaker admits that his own memories of watching a specific 1984 TV movie adaptation of Dickens informed just how dark and horror-twinged he wanted to take the tale of Ebenezer Scrooge.

“As a kid, I watched the George C. Scott version, and Marley really freaked me out,” West explains. “I have this visceral memory of one of the earliest horror-ish things that I watched being A Christmas Carol, and I got a little scared in a couple parts… So when I was talking about making the movie to the studio, I was like, ‘It’s hard-PG.’ I want to make something like the movies I grew up on that you were allowed to watch as a kid but occasionally pushed it just a little too far.”

Right down to casting the once and future genre-connoisseur Johnny Depp as a different take on Scrooge, West’s Ebenezer feels a world apart from Disney or Muppets interpretations, or even the slightly more sinister George C. Scott iteration. Right down to its visual aesthetics and antiquated opening credits sequence, West deliberately evokes the cinematic vernacular of mid-20th century British chillers like Hammer Studios’ cycle of lurid Victorian horror movies.

“I think Hammer has just such a pleasing aesthetic to me,” West explains, “The amount of conversations I had about ‘no, no the candle should be really red, or that candle should be really green or really blue.’ When you first put them on set, you’re like, ‘This is preposterous! This is a crazy thing to do,’ but I’m so charmed by the aesthetic of Hammer because there’s a beauty to those movies… they’re somewhat preposterous choices, but they are aesthetically appealing.” They also bring the film in line with a timeless sense of British cinema that West is aiming to evoke in a very familiar tale.

Indeed, when it comes to A Christmas Carol, whether it’s under the title of Ebenezer, Scrooge, or any other, the differences are key to make the effort worthwhile. In addition to heightening the spookiness of all three Spirits of Christmas, West has sought bold choices, such as beginning the film not with a time where “Jacob Marley was as dead as a door-nail,” but rather alive and played by Ian McKellen for an extended sequence where he trades pithy barbs with Depp’s Scrooge.

“It’s very hard to photograph ‘he was dead to begin with;’ it’s very hard to photograph ‘you must understand that he was dead,’” West observes. “There’s a sense of humor to this that gives you a context. But what I wanted to do is to really put the audience in Scrooge’s perspective more than they typically have in the past, and I wanted to make it a more subjective journey.” The director hopes audiences might have an involuntary giggle at Scrooge or Marley’s cynical asides, which puts you more on the journey with a man in desperate need of redemption. 

As that man, Depp is a bold choice, not least of all given he is a bit on the younger and American side for Ebenezer Scrooge, but the counterintuitiveness of Depp was the appeal for the director.

Says West, “A Christmas Carol is one of the few stories that can be remade over and over again because the story is profound and rock solid, but the interpretation of the story is interesting every time, depending on who’s doing it. The brilliance of the book is that it can handle Bill Murray doing it, it can handle the Muppets doing it, and it can handle Johnny Depp doing it, and it’s intriguing to see how they do it.”

When he first reached out to Depp, the two got jazzed by comparing their own childhood memories of A Christmas Carol, and West couldn’t shake how much he could only partially imagine the choices Depp would make with his and Nathaniel Halpern’s script.

“His enthusiasm was just so high, but I also don’t totally know what he’s gonna do,” West says.  “I sort of have a sense from what we’re talking about, but you look historically at all the characters he’s done [and there’s an element of surprise]. Edward Scissorhands on paper shouldn’t work. It’s ridiculous. He’s wearing this leather outfit, he’s got these [scissors], but you’re crying in that movie, because he’s able to bring in that humanity.” He also is able to bring in those horror-flecked homages, even to Depp’s previous work, although West insists the bit that is already in the trailers where Scrooge is swallowed up by his bed was in the script long before they cast the guy who suffered a similar fate in A Nightmare on Elm Street.

“Nathaniel and I put that in the script because we thought it was a cool, cinematic way to go to the past, and we both like Nightmare on Elm Street,” says West. “[We had] no clue that Johnny Depp would ever be in this movie. Never had met him, nothing. So when I finally talked to him about it, and he wanted to do the movie, I had kind of a mild panic the next day, because I realized we never talked about that.” The filmmaker ultimately called Depp back and offered to take it out of the script if the actor thought it was too self-referential, but Depp replied, “No, man, that’s my first movie. I think we gotta do it.’”

With that said, the likely most controversial innovations will be new wrinkles added to the social, economic, and, perhaps, political context of Ebenezer Scrooge’s worldview. While the story is eternally that of a miser being redeemed to see the best in his fellow man, in the new film this occurs after audiences also see the world from a cynical rich person’s perspective: scam artists on the streets of London who pretend to be disabled when they’re not, or charity workers who on the page have the poor’s best interest at heart, but in the film are taking donations to spend lavishly on their own coats and refinements.

“A lot of that stuff was to try to take characters that are a bit black-and-white at times and put some gray area into it,” says West. “In a lot of versions, Ebenezer Scrooge is kind of terrible in the decisions that he makes, but everybody else is pretty benevolent and without sin, if you will. So what we want to do is humanize everyone to say, ‘Not everybody’s perfect in this movie.’ It doesn’t make Scrooge any less bad because of it, but it does highlight that in this era, if he has a resistance to charity, is it just because he hates people? You could do that, but what if it is because he has a perspective on it that is probably not the right perspective to hold overall, but you see where he’s coming from? If he thinks there’s a bit of a scam in there, it doesn’t make him right, you should still give money to charity because it benefits people, but I could see why you would think it’s bullshit if you’ve had a bad experience with it.”

It’s an interesting juxtaposition compared to Dickens’ A Christmas Carol, which the author wrote as an indictment for the cruelties of society in his time, specifically of the rich. Before he penned Carol, Dickens initially intended to publish a pamphlet titled “An Appeal to the People of England, on behalf of the Poor Man’s Child,” before pivoting to a fictional story he thought would “feel that a Sledge hammer [has] come down with twenty times the force.”

West doesn’t necessarily seek to view his film in such macro terms, telling us, “I’m not profound enough to say that, but there are funny moments in the movie based on things like you’re talking about that get a reaction from an audience that is an involuntary reaction. There must be some truth to that in order for them to have that reaction. And I think there’s irony throughout the movie, and there is a bit of a wry sense of humor that Johnny brings to the character, that, again, I don’t really agree with him, but I know where he’s coming from, and that I think puts you in his perspective.

“Throughout the movie, he learns the lesson of it’d be better to come from somewhere else, and it would be better to adjust, and he does so… [we’re] just kind of sending him on a slightly different path along the way. It keeps it fresh and it lets it be our retelling of it, because that’s the fun of an enduring classic like this.”

Ebenezer is in theaters on Friday, Nov. 13.

The Elder Scrolls 6’s Long Wait Explained

After eight long years of waiting, Elder Scrolls fans were rewarded for their patience with a minute-long teaser of a windswept sandscape and a blue-gemmed scroll gleaming in the dunes. 

The full title of the game, The Elder Scrolls VI: Sentinel, was revealed by Bethesda Game Studios via X/Twitter on Nov. 3, as part of a video celebrating the studio’s 40th anniversary. The company thanked fans for years of “shared memories” and said it “feels great to finally reveal the name and location” of the long-awaited game. 

Elder Scrolls 6 was first teased at E3 (Electronic Entertainment Expo) in 2018, but development didn’t begin in earnest until 2023. In its anniversary Twitter post, Bethesda added that “development continues,” a reminder that the game is still unfinished, and warned that “it’ll be some time” before they share any further information, much to the dismay of fans who hoped for more. 

With no new details coming anytime soon, the natural question is how a game announced pre-COVID ended up this far from release. For those uninitiated or those who have waited for so long you can’t exactly remember why, let’s break down what the hold-up has been all these years. 

It all started with a premature announcement. Bethesda’s director, Todd Howard, delivered a now-notorious quote regarding the game in an IGN interview in March, where he joked, “Just pretend we didn’t announce it. Doesn’t exist,” when asked about the status of Elder Scrolls 6. When IGN pushed him to comment further on where the game actually stood, Howard interrupted with a resolute “Nothing.” Howard has famously expressed regrets about how the game was announced, too, which makes sense considering it was mostly to soften the blow of Fallout 76’s rocky launch. 

Then there’s how Bethesda traditionally functions. The studio has historically focused on one big game at a time, alternating between Elder Scrolls and Fallout. The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim came out in 2011 and Fallout 4 followed in 2015, which should have put Elder Scrolls 6 next in line. Kurt Kuhlmann, a longtime Bethesda veteran and Skyrim co-lead, certainly thought so: “Why wouldn’t it be? That’s what we did, and that was kind of the expectation,” he said, calling it the natural next step given how the studio had always worked. Instead, Starfield, a brand-new space-faring IP that Todd Howard had long wanted to make, jumped the queue and broke the studio’s usual rhythm. 

On top of that, there were also staffing problems. Kuhlmann himself left the studio in 2023 after more than 20 years at Bethesda. An ever bigger blow came this summer, when Microsoft’s Xbox layoffs hit the studio, with staff telling IGN that more than 50 employees were cut, including veterans who had worked on major title games. Developers warned the cuts would have “substantial and cascading effects” on the game, and fans feared yet another extensive delay. Bethesda insists the roadmap for Elder Scrolls 6 is “unaffected,” however, and says the game is now a primary focus, with a majority of staff working on it. Still, losing that much experience on a project this size is unlikely to speed anything up. 

So where is all that effort headed? 

The game’s teaser points to Hammerfell, a desert province on Tamriel, the continent where the Elder Scrolls series takes place. Sentinel is one of Hammerfell’s major cities and the capital of the Alik’r Desert region, home of the playable race called the Redguards. Hammerfell also happens to be one of Tamriel’s largest regions, a mix of barren desert, coastal trading, and rugged highlands. It’s best known to Skyrim players as the province that broke away from the Empire during the Great War, a conflict that Skyrim’s story often references. 

The teaser itself is short on details, showing a metallic scroll being unearthed from the sand, along with an in-world passage attributed to Yazar, a Moth Priest to the High Queen of Hammerfell. In the lore, Moth Priests are the scholars who read the Elder Scrolls, the ancient artifacts the series is named after. The passage is dated 4E 206, which would place the game roughly five years after Skyrim. 

Longtime fans already know a fair amount about Hammerfell, the area having appeared in The Elder Scrolls II: Daggerfall (1996), The Elder Scrolls Adventures: Redguard (1998), and The Elder Scrolls Online (2014), which gives Bethesda plenty of established culture, politics, and geography to draw on. The big question is whether Hammerfell can support the kind of sprawling, varied open world Skyrim delivered on. The 2011 game was set in a snowy northern province, so a desert setting will be a big change in look and feel for the series. How Bethesda keeps it interesting across a map that size is still anyone’s guess. 

The same goes for the release date. The hopeful estimate is 2028 or 2029, but there’s really no telling. Bethesda hasn’t offered an official date either, or even a window, so for now fans can only keep waiting. 

The Stranger Things Franchise Currently Has a Prequel Problem 

Like Icarus, Stranger Things flew too close to the sun. What was once a pop culture phenomenon limped to the finish line in its final season, weighed down by a bloated cast, a series of revelations that landed like lead weights, and a polarizing finale that had fans gaslighting themselves into thinking Netflix filmed a secret episode. (Matters weren’t helped when It: Welcome to Derry actually dropped a secret episode!) Now, Netflix is trying to launch a new chapter of the Stranger Things franchise with Other Worlds: A Stranger Things Adventure, which takes place 30 years before the main series.

While Stranger Things creators Ross and Matt Duffer have said that Other Worlds was in the works for several years, the announcement was met with skepticism rather than cheers in many online circles, and for good reason. Previous attempts to expand the world of Stranger Things have run into the “prequel problem” – delivering unsatisfying answers to questions fans have about a series or making unnecessary connections between characters. Key examples, of course, include the Star Wars prequels, but also the short-lived Fantastic Beasts series and X-Men Origins: Wolverine.

In the case of Stranger Things, the prequel problem has never been more prominent than with Stranger Things: The First Shadow, a stage play meant to explore the origins of Henry Creel a.k.a. Number One a.k.a. Vecna. While The First Shadow does manage to dive into the events that lead to Henry turning into Upside Down monster, it also made the strange decision to reveal that a young Jim Hopper was classmates with Joyce Hopper and Bob Newby. While that’s thankfully overshadowed by the bond Henry forms with Bob’s sister Patty, it feels less like an organic story decision and more of a reminder that this is a Stranger Things story. It also doesn’t help that Jack Thorne, who penned the similarly bizarre Harry Potter and the Cursed Child, helped develop the story for The First Shadow.

The First Shadow also heavily influenced season 5 of Stranger Things, to the point that a major plot element was lifted straight from the play. The issue is that unless you had Broadway tickets, there was no other way to see The First Shadow, meaning some fans were left out of the loop. Even the reveal that a filmed performance is coming to Netflix feels like The First Shadow showing up to a party just as it’s winding down.

It also looks like The First Shadow isn’t done influencing Stranger Things, as Other Worlds is said to focus on the strange rock Henry discovers in a cave. What this rock is, and what its connection is to the “other worlds” mentioned in the title, is unclear. But with this series being announced at a time when interest in Stranger Things is at an all-time low, Netflix is going to have to pull off a Mind Flayer-sized miracle if it wants to recapture the magic.

James Gunn Exiting DC Studios Could Set Superhero Movies Back 25 Years

In a total shocker, James Gunn and Peter Safran are no longer serving as co-heads of DC Studios. According to a news report from Variety, the duo “are stepping down as co-presidents of DC Studios” and will be replaced by Jeremy Latcham, a producer on Marvel Cinematic Universe entries such as Iron Man and The Avengers.

Of course, fans were worried about Gunn and Safran’s position at DC Studios when Warner Bros. was sold to Paramount owner David Ellison, who has close ties to Trump administration and previously oversaw an ideological staffing shakeup at CBS News program 60 Minutes. Moreover, much has been written about the sizable debt wracked up to buy Warner Bros. and combine it with Paramount to form a new company, Skydance.

At this point, we don’t know why exactly Gunn and Safran are leaving the position, especially after the duo were named as members of Ellison’s leadership team. A post on social media from Gunn makes it sound as though this was their decision as much or more than that of Ellison’s. However, we can say one things with some certainty: superhero movies are moving backwards.

Whatever one feels about Gunn as a filmmaker, no one can deny that he loved the weird parts of superhero lore. He turned a space tree who could only say its name and a gun-toting raccoon into fan favorites with Guardians of the Galaxy. He made the Polka-Dot Man into a rich, sympathetic figure in The Suicide Squad. He gave Z-lister Peacemaker two seasons of a prestige HBO series.

That’s a far cry from the earlier days of superhero movies, when only Superman and Batman could carry a film, and not even reliably then. Sure, the (then) D-lister Blade kicked off the second wave of superhero movies in 1997, an era that saw some lesser-known characters like Jonah Hex and the Spirit get feature films. But even that era was still defined by the big guns, Batman and Spider-Man. It’s only after Iron Man and The Avengers kicked off the third wave of superhero movies that the genre got weird. And, unsurprisingly, they got weird under James Gunn, starting with the first Guardians of the Galaxy in 2014.

But it wasn’t just that Gunn loved the goofy side of superheroes. It’s also that he gave them meaning. Peacemaker isn’t just a show about a muscle man with a stupid silver helmet on his head played by John Cena. It’s also a show about toxic masculinity, about unlearning the hurt one picks up from childhood. Superman, certainly an A-lister if there ever was one, is about the power of kindness and peace, especially in light of those who would hurt others to compensate for their weakness, like Lex Luthor. Even the projects that Gunn didn’t directly make but greenlit show this adventurousness, namely the detective series Lanterns and the horror film Clayface. Obviously, Gunn saw superheroes as rich subject matter, suitable for all types of stories.

Surely, Gunn isn’t the only person in Hollywood who thinks this way. Moreover, he explicitly stated that he and Safran are not “immediately done with DC or superheroes,” citing both the Superman sequel Man of Tomorrow and another project that he’s writing. But the fact of the matter is that Gunn and Safran couldn’t make their vision at DC Studios work under the increasingly small studio system makes us wonder if anyone else can do it better. Surely, we’ll get more superhero movies from the DC Universe. But it’s hard to believe that they’ll be anything other than what we’re getting at Marvel, safe and bland retreads, as Avengers: Doomsday seems to be.

And so, even though it’s early, we can’t help but feel like the age of superhero movies has come to an end. It’s been 26 years since X-Men picked up where Blade left off, shifting from minor superheroes with some potential to the big name characters. With Gunn and his odd sensibilities pushed to the sidelines, it seems like we’re going back to that era, when studios wanted safe, predictable movies about the mainline heroes. Which is better than nothing, but not as good as it’s been.

Where Do The ‘Godzilla Minus’ Movies Go From Here?

Godzilla Minus Zero made its much-awaited debut this weekend, and once again, the King of the Monsters reigns supreme. Not only has Minus Zero received positive reviews, but it also took the top spot at the box office. Surely that means that a third movie is in the works, but writer and director Takashi Yamazaki recently revealed that the future of the Godzilla franchise is up in the air. 

“I would say it’s about fifty-fifty at this point. I’m quite satisfied and happy with the current ending we have,” Yamazaki told The Hollywood Reporter. “That being said, if Godzilla Minus Zero is my last Godzilla film, that would make me a bit sad.” Here’s where we get into spoiler territory, as Minus Zero ends on a note that could lead to a third movie but also is a solid ending in and of itself.

The following contains spoilers for Godzilla Minus Zero.

As fans now know, Godzilla Minus Zero finds Godzilla rising to combat one of his deadliest enemies: the three-headed dragon known as “King Ghidorah.” The battle ends with the King of the Monsters victorious, and the U.S. military holding off on delivering a killing strike as they view Godzilla as a potential weapon. Godzilla returns to the ocean to peacefully slumber; meaning that a future Godzilla movie can choose to deliver its own take on the Big G if Yamazaki doesn’t return, or that Yamazaki could develop a new story that sees Godzilla rising once again.

But what would that threat be? After all, Ghidorah is essentially Godzilla’s archnemesis – the Green Goblin to his Spider-Man or the Lex Luthor to his Superman. There actually is a monster in the Toho creature canon, however, that could let Yamazaki deliver a grand finale to the Minus movies and top Ghidorah in terms of menace: Destoroyah. 

Originally starting life as a colony of sea creatures, mutation transforms Destoroyah into a demonic creature that destroys everything in its path in 1995’s Godzilla vs. Destoroyah. Not helping matters is the fact that Godzilla is slowly overheating with nuclear energy throughout the film, leading to his death. To continue the comic book analogy, if Ghidorah was Godzilla’s Lex Luthor then Destroyah is his Doomsday. That would be a more than fitting way to make the Minus movies a trilogy and let Yamazaki tell a complete story.

Yamazaki’s next project, while not Godzilla-related, could end up being just as important as his Minus offerings. Thanks to the success of Godzilla Minus Zero, Yamazaki received acclaim from legendary directors like Christopher Nolan and Steven Spielberg. Now J.J. Abrams has stepped up to produce Yamazaki’s upcoming film Grandgear, which will also double as his English-language debut. Details about Grandgear remain scarce, but if Yamazaki can bring the same sense of scale and human emotion to it that he did with Godzilla Minus Zero, then his career will reach an entirely new level.

Time will tell if a third Godzilla Minus movie will become a reality. But no matter what happens, Takashi Yamazaki has cemented himself as one of the best filmmakers ever to work with the King of the Monsters.

Robert Pattinson Would Be the Perfect Gen Z Bond

Early in his career as a young adult, Robert Pattinson made a name for himself by telling ridiculous stories to reporters on press tours, most famously one about seeing a clown die in an explosion. So it was amusing to see him get a taste of his own medicine when he and co-star Jennifer Lawrence interviewed one another while promoting the (underrated!) 2025 film Die My Love. Amidst the back and forth, the very much millennial Pattinson found himself shocked that Lawrence refused to accept the fact that he is a member of Generation Z, an exchange that is now heavily memed.

Outside of Lawrence, no one would doubt that Pattinson is Gen Z. Presumably, one of those believers is director Denis Villeneuve, who is not only working with Pattinson for next month’s Dune: Part Three, but is also directing the next James Bond movie. According to a surprise bit of news dropped over the weekend, Villeneuve had Pattinson, along with Nicholas Hoult, screen test for Bond, adding two heretofore unconsidered names to the list for the next 007. While the others candidates, including Callum Turner and Jack Lowden, are also Gen Z, Pattinson has the opportunity to be the most Gen Z Bond possible.

To some, the words “Gen Z” Bond will provoke a strong, negative reaction. After all, author Ian Fleming created Bond as a product of the Cold War, a super spy whose various indiscretions were praised, in part because of the high stakes involved in saving the free world from the Communist threat. Those stakes allowed Bond to remain somewhat consistent, even if actors and tones varied wildly through the late ’80s. But Bond has struggled to find an identity since the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989, and studios have struggled to make Bond relevant for each new set of viewers.

Timothy Dalton played an edgy crusader in the drug war for the late Baby Boomers. Pierce Brosnan‘s Bond had to get a good dressing-down from M at the start of GoldenEye, properly called out for his behavior in order to appeal to cynical Gen X viewers who rather just play the Nintendo 64 game anyway. For the millennials, Bond had become too silly and convoluted, so they got a grounded reinvention with Casino Royale, one that told introduced firm continuity to appeal to those who love shared universes.

With Daniel Craig‘s era coming to a definitive end with No Time to Die, Bond must once again change his style to appeal to Gen Z. Hits like Obsession prove that Gen Z has a thirst for the movies, but their interests differ from what’s come before. These moviegoers will show up for big blockbuster franchises like Dune, Barbie, and Spider-Man: Brand New Day, but their devotion to auteurs such as Christopher Nolan, stars such as Timothée Chalamet and Florence Pugh, and even distributors such as A24 shows that they are perhaps more savvy about their movie-watching than the two generations that proceeded them.

For those reasons, Robert Pattinson is the ideal choice to play Bond. With his lantern jaw and floppy hair, Pattinson has all of the requisite good looks we want in a 00-Agent. And he even did a dry run in a Bond-esque espionage thriller, albeit in more of the Felix Leiter role for Nolan’s Tenet. But it’s been a long time since Pattinson’s taken a role that relied only on his good looks. Like his Twilight franchise co-star Kristen Stewart, Pattinson’s been one of our most interesting working actors, choosing roles that allow him to be weird and even off-putting, working against his considerable charisma.

Based on his previous work, Villeneuve will probably give us a more serious spy thriller, perhaps something closer to Sicario, avoiding the campiness of Roger Moore or Brosnan’s eras. But he’ll also likely have lots of room for things to get weird, as demonstrated by even a more emotional movie like Arrival.

That’s where Pattinson can come in. He could certainly play the suave social player, who can saunter up to a baccarat table and give a charming wink to the woman sitting next to him. He can play the unflappable hero, who doesn’t lose his cool, even when strapped into some death trap. And he can play the brawler, the guy who punches out the villain’s minions, after disposing with other underlings via a spray of bullets.

But Pattinson can also add that extra layer of depth that Gen Z audiences want to see in their heroes. Take his version of Bruce Wayne in The Batman, the clearest comp to Bond. It wasn’t just that Pattinson’s Bond beat the ever-living crap out of some street toughs at the opening, nor was it just the way he decoded clues alongside Jim Gordon. It was the streaks of black eye-makeup that he revealed when he took off his mask, or the look of confusion that crossed his face when the Riddler acted like they were on the same side. This Batman wasn’t just a superhero; he was a broken man who dressed up like a bat to fight crime because he didn’t know what else to do.

Pattinson can do the same as Bond. His Bond wouldn’t just be the ultimate ’60s male fantasy, a guy who gets out of every death trap and gets into bed with every girl. His Bond would be a broken man who doesn’t fit anywhere else in society, a misfit who found acceptance not at Eton or in the Royal Navy, but serving as a blunt instrument of the empire.

With Pattinson in the lead, James Bond could be the weird, rich, and ultimately off-kilter Bond that Gen Z wants to see. And that’s because Robert Pattinson is Gen Z, no matter what Jennifer Lawrence or anyone else might think.

Batman: 5 Actors Who Should Don the Cape and Cowl in the DCU

In a recent podcast about The Suicide Squad‘s canonicity to the new DCU, James Gunn said something that felt like a bat-signal blazing in the sky: Batman will be cast soon. We’ve long known that Robert Pattinson’s version of the Dark Knight in The Batman exists outside of DCU continuity, and Gunn announced Batman movie The Brave and the Bold as one of the first projects he and DC Studios co-head Peter Safran would be taking on. But, thus far, besides a silhouette in an episode of Creature Commandos, no Batman has actually been seen in the DCU, despite the movie Clayface taking place in Gotham City.

With a proper announcement of a new Batman coming, now’s the perfect time for us fans to do what we do best, and start making demands. The Brave and the Bold will reportedly feature the Damian Wayne version of Robin, Bruce Wayne’s preteen assassin son, which gives us a sense of how old this new Batman should be, as does the timeline laid out at the start of Superman. So, with those parameters in place, let’s start to speculate about the next person who gets to say, “I’m Batman.”

Alan Ritchson

One of the more popular fancasts for Batman, Ritchson has reportedly been speaking to James Gunn about a part in the DCU. Anyone who knows Ritchson’s work on the show Reacher understands how well he plays a brutal man who can execute a plan. And if Gunn and co. want to follow the lead of the wildly popular Absolute Batman, then the hulking Ritchson would be a great choice. That said, Ritchson has a military vibe about him that might make him more interesting as a character associated with the Armed Forces, such as the all-powerful Captain Atom or the villain Major Force.

Jake Gyllenhaal

One of the more interesting leading men of recent years, Jake Gyllenhaal certainly knows his way around a superhero movie. Before his loony turn as Mysterio in Spider-Man: Far From Home, Gyllenhaal almost took Tobey Maguire’s place when contract negotiations stalled out before Spider-Man 2. But the real thing in Gyllenhaal’s favor is his ability to be both handsome and weird. The real-life son of industry insiders, Gyllenhaal has a certain blue-blood quality, necessary to play Bruce Wayne, to say nothing of his good looks. But Gyllenhaal can also be an absolute weirdo, something that’s been central to Batman portrayals since Michael Keaton invited us all to get nuts in 1989.

Ethan Peck

Most Den of Geek readers know Ethan Peck as Spock from Star Trek: Strange New Worlds. And even if the quality of that show has diminished over recent seasons precisely because it spends way too much time on Spock’s love life, no one can deny that Peck does justice to Leonard Nimoy‘s character in the way he plays a stoic outsider. What readers may not know is that, in interviews, Peck is all charisma and charm. Furthermore, he is a blue blood as well, the grandson of respected screen legend Gregory Peck. Together, that means Peck could believably play a millionaire playboy born of privilege and a brooding grouch who has no patience for the shenanigans happening around him.

Henry Cavill

At this point, it’s utter cliché to pull Henry Cavill‘s name when talking about superhero casting. But in the case of Batman, it makes a lot of sense. As seen on The Witcher and in Mission Impossible: Fallout, Cavill works best, not when he’s wearing a symbol that means “hope,” but when he’s a grouch who is quickly running out of patience with anyone around him. He certainly looks good in a suit and he knows how to turn on the charm when needed. But if anyone can play a brooding, angry Batman, it’s Cavill.

Bill Skarsgård

Obviously, this one’s out of left field, and not just because Skarsgård’s taller and lankier than the usual Batman hopeful. It’s because Skarsgård knows how to play a creepy clown, and therefore should be the Joker. But if we’re looking at the Absolute Universe with Ritchson, we might also pay attention to the way that the Absolute Joker is essentially mainline Batman, a suave guy who has a cave under his mansion and lots of wonderful toys. Following that logic, one could imagine casting Pennywise as the DCU Batman, someone who cuts an impressive figure when in fancy clothes (remember John Wick: Chapter Four?), but who certainly feels like a creature of the night. Who else could better scare criminals, that superstitious and cowardly lot?

The Insect-Inspired Superhero Franchise Kamen Rider Is Finally Making Waves

When I attended L.A. Comic Con this Halloween weekend, I was floored by the sheer presence that Japanese superhero media franchise Kamen Rider had. There was an official Kamen Rider booth selling figures and Rider Belts, not to mention stunt performers dressed as Kamen Rider MY-TH and Kamen Rider ZEZTZ. 

A Kamen Rider panel flew directors and writers all the way out from Japan to discuss the franchise’s 55th anniversary. I was in a packed theater room for an English screening of Agito: Psychic War, which celebrated the 25th anniversary of Kamen Rider Agito; the entire length of said screening was filled with thunderous applause. People love Kamen Rider, and its studio Toei recently announced its intentions to bring more Kamen Rider projects to America.

A quick primer for those not in the know: Kamen Rider is a series that often focuses on a character who’s transformed into a cyborg or alien hybrid by an evil organization or an invading alien race. The newly-minted “Kamen Rider” decides to use their abilities for good, and they’re usually joined by another person who dons the Rider mantle. Though Kamen Riders vary in theme, three things are usually true: most of the Kamen Riders bear an insect-like visage, they drive a really cool motorcycle, and they finish off evil with a signature “Rider Kick.” Given the popularity that Mighty Morphin Power Rangers enjoyed in America, you’d think Kamen Rider would have had the same success…but it hasn’t happened.

That’s about to change, thanks to two new initiatives launched by Toei (the massive studio behind Kamen Rider and other popular Japanese tokusatsu.) President and CEO Yoshimura Fumio recently revealed during the Taiwan Creative Content Fest that the company is launching “Kamen Rider Animation,” a label which will bring Kamen Rider-themed anime worldwide, and “Kamen Rider Premium,” which is meant to launch standalone movies that won’t connect to the ongoing Kamen Rider TV series.

Most fans are focusing on the news that Toei will use generative AI in its film and video production, which raises a lot of concerns. Given that tokusatu productions like Kamen Rider often focus on practical effects, how will genAI affect that? Kamen Rider is a series that has frequently explored the double-edged sword technology can be and Toei needs to be very careful about how it utilizes these tools.

While the question of genAI still lingers, Kamen Rider Animation and Kamen Rider Premium are clever initiatives that could introduce a whole new generation of fans to Kamen Rider. For starters, there’s the fact that anime has become a global phenomenon. You’re just as likely to see people dressing up as characters from Demon Slayer or Chainsaw Man at a con as Spider-Men or Dungeon Crawler Carls; Toei is capitalizing on this by bringing Kamen Rider to a medium that’s perfect for the high-octane fights a Rider might get into. Having standalone movies also turns Kamen Rider into a cinematic draw, especially for those who are new to the franchise. In a day and age where franchises expanding their output to television or movies is considered “homework,” Toei just gave fans the perfect hopping on point.

This approach is also a big deal because previous attempts to bring Kamen Rider to America were…less than successful. Masked Rider, which adapted Kamen Rider Black RX, attempted to ride Power Rangers’ popularity but was a massive flop. A second attempt was made when Kamen Rider Dragon Knight aired on the CW; despite being more faithful to its source material and featuring some genuinely amazing fights, poor marketing led to it flying under the radar. 

The rise of Kamen Rider Animation and Kamen Rider Premium, alongside simultaneous U.S./Japan broadcasts of current Kamen Rider series and an upcoming Kamen Rider Zero-One/Batman crossover, proves that Toei wants Kamen Rider to be a worldwide hit. This time, it might actually pull it off.

The Strange Case of Doctor Mordrid, the Off-Brand Doctor Strange Rip-Off

When Doctor Stephen Strange arrives in Kamar-Taj at the start of the 2016 movie Doctor Strange he thinks he knows everything. As in the Marvel comics by Steve Ditko and Stan Lee that inspired the film, Strange has come to find a cure for his shattered hands. But as an arrogant surgeon and a devoted rationalist, he cannot bring himself to believe in the magic practiced by the Ancient One. Only once the Ancient One opens his third eye and shows him the many worlds of the multiverse does Strange begin to understand.

As we saw in the sequel, Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness, that understanding includes the acknowledgment of other worlds, places that seem familiar, but are ultimately different, sometimes terrifyingly so. Perhaps, in another adventure, Strange visited a world where there lived another Master of the Mystic Arts. This fellow traveler also dressed in blue and wore a powerful talisman, which he uses against a former friend turned enemy, not unlike Strange’s arch-enemy Baron Mordo. This sorcerer could have been Doctor Strange, but because of an issue with copyright and licensing deals, he became Doctor Mordrid, as played by Jeffrey Combs in the delightful 1992 film from budget studio Full Moon Entertainment.

Copyright Magic

The story of Doctor Mordrid begins with Stan Lee and, more specifically, with Lee’s love of the movies. Lee was in his 40s when the Marvel Age of comics began in the early 1960s, having long worked as a writer and editor for companies owned by his uncle-in-law Martin Goodman, including Timely Comics and Atlas Comics. Lee had long since put behind him his aspirations of writing the great American novel. But when Marvel proved to be a cultural phenomenon, he leveraged that attention to move outside of comics, booking a college speaking tour, hosting an event at Radio City Music Hall, and making friends with people in the entertainment industry.

Sometimes, that meant partnerships with filmmakers such as French New Wave director Alain Resnais; other times, it just meant trying to get Marvel heroes on the screen. While Lee had varying success with live-action and animated shows featuring Spider-Man and the Hulk, big-screen deals eluded the House of Ideas until the 1986 flop Howard the Duck. After that film’s failure, the best Marvel could do was produce direct-to-video schlock, such 1989’s The Punisher and 1990’s Captain America, until 1998’s Blade and 2002’s Spider-Man turned things around.

Worse, Marvel hit upon hard times in the ’90s, when various forces such as the burst of the comic book speculator market drove the company into bankruptcy. To stay afloat, Marvel sold off the distribution rights to some of its characters, which is why Sony still gets to make Spider-Man movies today, and why Disney had to buy Fox to get ahold of the Fantastic Four and the X-Men.

That may have been why brothers Charles and Albert Band started working on a Doctor Strange film for their B-level studio, Full Moon Features. The purveyors of video store favorite franchises such as Puppet Master and Subspecies, Full Moon Features thrived on high concepts, low budgets, and the promise of shocking material. Yet, the brothers were huge Marvel fans, and took their cues from the publisher, creating a shared universe among their movies and Charles presenting himself as a jovial host in promotional material, not unlike Lee’s “Stan’s Soapbox” column in the comics.

According to most accounts, the brothers were friendly with both Lee and Jack Kirby, the artist who created many of Marvel’s heroes. Those connections allowed them to secure a license to adapt Doctor Strange. But the production took so long that the rights reverted back to Marvel. Rather than let good work go to waste, the Bands simply swapped out a few names, and Doctor Mordrid was born.

However, the opening credits to Doctor Mordrid do identify the project as “Based on an Original Idea by Charles Band.” Furthermore, Cecil Trachtenburg of GoodBadFlicks revealed on the Puppet Masters and Castle Freaks podcast that Doctor Mordrid screenwriter C. Courtney Joyner asserted that the film was always just an homage to Doctor Strange, never a direct adaptation.

Whatever the true story, the fact remains that Doctor Mordrid plays like an alternate reality Doctor Strange movie, and a very good one at that.

The Tale of Doctor Mordrid

Doctor Mordrid opens as any story about a Master of the Mystic Arts should, in a stately library lit mostly by candles. Over a rousing score by Richard Band, promising adventure and thrills, the camera floats around the cavernous room, passing by strange objects that certainly hold untold power. After the opening credit sequence, we cut to a star field, through which peer two floating eyes. A rumbling, disembodied voice declares, “The Death’s Head will seek you out.”

Who does this cosmic figure, who we will know as the Monitor, address? None other than Doctor Anton Mordrid, who stands ready to take up the challenge, citing his oath to meet the Death’s Head.

An actor best known for playing weirdos in off-beat horror films like Re-Animator and From Beyond, and known for his multiple roles in the world of Star Trek, including the Vorta Weyoun on Deep Space Nine and the Andorian Shran on Enterprise, Combs gets a rare heroic part as Doctor Mordrid. But “heroic” should not be confused for “normal.” Combs plays Mordrid as a man either irritated or confused by the goings-on of the regular people around him, even those who rent rooms in his stately brownstone home. One such renter is Samantha Hunt (Yvette Nipar), a consultant in supernatural crimes working with the police, specifically detective Tony Gaudio (Jay Acovone).

When Samantha and Guadio discover a murder victim drained of blood, a strange sigil on her body, Hunt recognizes the symbol from the library of her new acquaintance Doctor Mordrid. Together, Mordrid and Samantha search for the wizard Kabal (all-time ’80s “that guy” Brian Thompson), who has been gathering items of power throughout the film. By the end of the movie, Mordrid and Kabal test one another’s magical might, resulting in a battle with dinosaur skeletons, astral projection, and lots of lightning.

If that sounds a bit haphazard, well, it is. Although perfectly acted by the leading cast, and certainly more ambitious than your average Puppet Master entry, Doctor Mordrid is still a Full Moon Feature, which tend to emphasize big, weird ideas over tight plotting. The film does feel a bit stretched out, even at 74 minutes, something no one would say about its MCU cousin. But does that make it a worse movie?

Strange and Stranger

Despite some differences, such as the fact that he’s an ageless defender of the Earth, Doctor Mordrid is a pretty direct copy of Doctor Strange, complete with his astral projection powers and use of an amulet that recalls the Eye of Agamotto. Kabal feels like an off-brand Mordo, while the Monitor is a mix of the Ancient One and the Vishanti. Between those near-misses and its decidedly lower budget, it’s easy to dismiss Doctor Mordrid as an unnecessary relic of the pre-MCU age.

But Doctor Mordrid should not be forgotten, for that very reason. There’s a directness and a sincerity to the film that gets lost in modern MCU entries, which try so hard to appeal to larger audiences. Where Benedict Cumberbatch plays Strange as a snarky know-it-all like Tony Stark, Combs makes Mordrid truly strange, someone otherworldly, closer to his comic book counterpart. Moreover, there’s a nastiness to Doctor Mordrid that comes from its Full Moon pedigree, including a gratuitous nude scene for a Satanic ritual, which retains a danger to the mystic arts, something lost in the MCU.

Is Doctor Mordrid better than Doctor Strange? No, of course not. But it is a worthy film on its own, a reminder of the types of superhero movies we used to have, in a different time and in a different world.

Star Wars: Ben Solo Never Needed To Come Back Anyway

Last year, Star Wars fans were shocked by the revelation that Lucasfilm turned down The Hunt for Ben Solo, a story that would have followed The Artist Formerly Known as Kylo Ren as he dealt with his redemption in the wake of Star Wars: Episode IX – The Rise of Skywalker. Not only would Adam Driver have reprised his role as Ben Solo, but none other than Steven Soderbergh was tapped to direct, with Scott Z. Burns (World War Z) penning the script. 

Ultimately, the project never went through as then-Disney heads Bob Iger and Alan Bergman spent a lengthy amount of time reading the script, and Driver and Soderbergh deciding to move on. “I’m not doing any more,” Driver told the Smartless podcast in 2024. Yet that didn’t stop fans from campaigning to get Lucasfilm to reverse their decision. A plane flew a banner over the Disney lot. Fans paid to have an electronic billboard in Times Square. Even Rian Johnson, who turned out in of the best modern Star Wars projects in the form of Star Wars: Episode VIII – The Last Jedi, threw his support behind the Solo film.

However, while the idea of a Steven Soderbergh-directed Star Wars film is a promising prospect, it’s a good thing that The Hunt for Ben Solo never came to pass. (And now it almost certainly never will, with Driver recently telling The Rich Eisen Show “Yeah, it’s over. No more Star Wars.) For one thing, it would have felt like an attempt to course correct the franchise after The Rise of Skywalker, which itself was an attempt to try and course correct on the (utterly wrong) assumption that The Last Jedi broke the franchise. For all its ups and downs, the Star Wars sequel trilogy did bring some major changes to the galaxy far, far away, and it’s better to move forward rather than look backwards.

Some fans might point out that The Hunt for Ben Solo would give the former Kylo Ren more character development. Those fans are forgetting that such a story exists in a miniseries published by Marvel Comics: The Rise of Kylo Ren, The Reign of Kylo Ren, and The Fall of Kylo Ren by Charles Soule, Will Sliney, and Luke Ross. In this trilogy, readers witness Ben Solo’s descent into darkness and his inner war with himself as he rules the First Order. It’s truly a well-written character piece that adds far more depth to the Sequel Trilogy and Ben himself. Some of the best Star Wars stories aren’t on the big screen, and these comics are proof of that.

Another major factor that must be considered is how the campaign to bring The Hunt for Ben Solo to life ran parallel to the “Release the Snyder Cut” movement that plagued the internet for years. While the latter campaign did feel fulfilled by the release of Zack Snyder’s Justice League, a large part of the reason why it was greenlit is that HBO Max needed a big draw as it then was only a year old and in need of some angry nerds’ subscription dollars. There’s also the “Restore the SnyderVerse” campaign that popped up and continues to this day, proving that the old adage of “giving an inch and taking a mile” has some merit. While The Hunt for Ben Solo campaign hasn’t stooped to such annoying behavior, a potential success would lead to more fans trying to push their demands on Lucasfilm. And as The Rise of Skywalker proved, you cannot please everyone – least of all Star Wars fans.

Next year marks the 50th anniversary of Star Wars, with Starfighter charting a new course in the galaxy far, far away. In that spirit, it’s time to let Ben Solo rest.

Phantom Fest Brings Genre Cinema and a Tim Curry Tribute to Texas

There are a lot of fan conventions out there, but they don’t all embrace the wonderfully weird side of pop culture the way Phantom Fest does. Only at this Houston-based gathering can you discover an unexpected international gem while simultaneously revisiting a beloved cult classic and celebrating alongside the performers and filmmakers who make genre entertainment so memorable. Such is the spirit behind Phantom Fest, which returns in January 2027 with an expanded lineup of horror, sci-fi, fantasy, action, and everything in between.

Running from January 14 to 17 at Houston’s historic River Oaks Theatre, the four-day showcase seeks to offer considerably more than a traditional film festival. Presented by Surprise Surprise Studio, Phantom Fest is going beyond the big screen to incorporate television, music, and live performance alongside its traditional (but unconventional) collections of premieres, cult favorites, and restorations. In the first wave of programming announcements, it’s clear that genre fans will have plenty of reasons to make the trip to Texas this winter.

One of the main attractions this year is the special 50th anniversary screening of Dario Argento’s horror classic, Suspiria. To give this celebration of the landmark 1977 film a special flair, a live score performance by Sergio Trevino will accompany the viewing. Fans of Argento’s distinctive brand of cinematic nightmares will appreciate what a little in-house music can do to accentuate the spookiness.

Phantom Fest also makes room for some offerings that are truly off the beaten path. Witness Angus Silver’s Insectasy, a psychosexual drama about a 20-something receptionist trapped by social isolation who escapes through lush daydreams and an all-consuming erotic fascination with insects. Also worth checking out is Zsazsa Zaturnnah, an adult animated superhero romantic comedy adapted from Carlo Vergara’s LGBTQIA cult-classic graphic novel about a shy, gay beautician who gains superhuman abilities and must face alien forces while learning to love again.

Another event at this year’s Phantom Fest is destined to be a popular highlight: Don’t Dream It, Be It: A Tribute to Tim Curry. This career retrospective honors the actor’s remarkable range and his most iconic roles ranging from scene-stealing villains to beloved cult favorites. Be prepared for a one-of-a-kind live shadow-cast performance of a Tim Curry classic!

Filmmaker and performer Andrew Bowser will also be on-hand as a guest host and moderator to offer a first look at Turmoil in the Toybox and lead a workshop on crowdfunding for film projects. This is in addition to the many other filmmaker and writer workshops, story panels, live podcast recordings, author readings, and talent signings, not to mention plenty of amazing cosplay.

Characterized by the guest activities in its special feature “Hallowinter,” a special January extension of spooky season, Phantom Fest has fun bringing its unique take to genre fan gatherings, and since this is only the first wave of announcements, expect to hear about more films, guests, and events in the coming weeks. For a festival that aims to bring filmmakers and fans together while celebrating the many weird corners of horror, science fiction, and more, there’s already plenty to get excited about!

Badges are on sale now with early-bird pricing through Monday, November 30.

Godzilla Minus Zero: Exploring the Ending and the Nuclear Destruction of Ideals

This article contains major Godzilla Minus Zero spoilers. Our spoiler-free review is here.

Have a safe trip.

Rarely has such a sweet, innocuous phrase carried such devastating power in a movie as when Akiko (Sae Nagatani) stands atop a lonely slide and cries it again and again. It’s a chant, a prayer for safe passage, but also an agonized outpouring of grief over the soon-to-be absence of her adopted parents Kôichi Shikishima (Ryûnosuke Kamiki) and Noriko Ôishi (Minami Hamabe). In the scene, the loving, doting parents feel compelled to leave, for the good of Akiko they tell themselves, and certainly for the good of the world.

While Noriko continues to live—which by all accounts may not be for much longer—her blood holds the secret for summoning and controlling nuclear-powered monsters. As Japan knows all too well, it’s the power of gods in a human’s hands. Also specific to that island nation in these bitter postwar years in which Takashi Yamazaki’s Godzilla movies are set, is an appreciation that such awesome power is not a natural thing.

It can change one’s priorities, their ideals, and even their souls. But it doesn’t mean it should cause one to forsake their humanity. Indeed, there are few more emotionally sentimental, and satisfying, endings than when Kôichi and Noriko hear the cry of their child, who they have convinced themselves they must leave behind. Earlier in the movie, Noriko explained “have a safe trip” is like a spell said by one loved one to another as a form of protection. It’s an act of love, which might be the only ideal worth preserving when the world ends.

How facing such apocalypse can shift your perspective and ideals is at the heart of Godzilla Minus Zero’s ending, as much as the undeniably stunning work that Yamazaki’s special effects team dreams up when kings clash. So let’s explore the full fallout, radioactive and otherwise, that occurred when Godzilla and Ghidorah met…

Sparing the World Another Oppenheimer

Despite 70 years of kaiju movies already on the books, the first teaser of Godzilla Minus Zero proved to be faintly shocking in its subversiveness: the Big G makes landfall on Liberty Island in New York Harbor, dwarfing in scale above the Statue of Liberty herself. It promised menacing things for the American city that never sleeps.

The finished film delivers them with fire and fury. There have been other Godzilla movies that have seen a kaiju take a bite out of the Big Apple, both Japanese and American, yet none so provocatively or framed through the wanton destruction of a nuclear bomb. But when Yamazaki’s monstrous lizard opens his yawning mouth and blasts lower Manhattan with a mushroom cloud, there wasn’t a single drop of laughter or popcorn munching at the New York Film Festival premiere I attended. There wasn’t even a fig leaf of allegory in the text: this sequence is the fantasy of a survivor of Hiroshima, Dr. Kanji Murakami (Min Tanaka), who is dreaming about one day visiting upon the American superpower what the U.S. brought to Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

In 1949, when Godzilla Minus Zero is set, this kind of quiet daydream might have faintly reflected the time. While Yamazaki’s film is undeniably a work of fantasy, imagining an alternative reality where in the rebuilding years following World War II, the Japanese government allocated massive amounts of dwindling resources to researching and fighting giant monsters who are beginning to make stomping Tokyo Bay a seasonal event. (It’s also a bit incredulous to believe the U.S. government would allow Japan to rebuild its navy and air armaments so soon after the war, Godzilla or no Godzilla.)

Nonetheless, Japan was very much in the midst of an American occupation that lasted from 1945 to 1952, and which has lingering effects to this day that extend beyond U.S. military bases. Consider that during the same period this movie is set, the Civil Censorship Detachment—a department among the Allied Powers—censored any reporting in Japan or abroad about the horrifying side effects of radiation poisoning left by the atomic bombs.

It’s the kind of denial that can breed resentment, especially from those who lived through the horror, such as Dr. Murakami in the movie. Not since the original Godzilla of 1954 has a Toho kaiju movie so explicitly drawn the 1:1 lines of allegory between the psychic and physical scars of nuclear war and the cinematic image of a giant lizard making buildings go boom-boom.

The sequence where a doctor remembers how Noriko was saved from the wreckage of Ginza in the last Yamazaki Godzilla movie, Godzilla Minus One, might be the most horrifying beat in the whole film. In a long tracking shot, doctors, nurses, and victims scramble across rivers of blood in what once was a hospital corridor. The aftermath of terror and carnage overtly echoes many tableaus of suffering and loss in the Second World War. The once censored documentation of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, yes, but also the firebombing of Tokyo—or for that matter the many Chinese and Korean victims of the Empire of Japan in the 1930s.

It is this sequence, along with a flashback of Murakami remembering Hiroshima that likely got Minus Zero an R-rating, a first for a Godzilla movie. But it also lays the stage for the anger of characters like Murakami and his dream of exacting a bloody revenge by way of unleashing Godzilla like a nuclear weapon on the United States.

That thirst for vengeance becomes just as much the dramatic heft behind the third act of Godzilla Minus Zero as the spectacle of the Big G and King Ghidorah trading blows in the ruins of Ginza. Perhaps more so. While there has never been a more satisfying “let them fight” matchup in a Toho film than the grounded stakes of Kōichi, Noriko, and my favorite character, naval genius Kenji Noda (Hidetaka Yoshioka), sifting through the rubble while gods spar in the heavens, the fight is still fundamentally like so many others in Godzilla movies. The humans are hoping the enemy of their enemy is their friend, and that despite past differences Godzilla will save them.

What gives the sequence more ominous weight is the idea of how we got here: Dr. Murakami has figured out a way to summon Godzilla and, essentially, convince him to attack at our behest by using his technological innovations… and the blood of poor Noriko. For in the other chilling echo of real-world nuclear horrors, we learn that those who survived the last film’s Ginza slaughter were touched by the backhand of God(zilla). Noriko lived, but her blood is irradiated. One day it will kill her, but not before leaving physical and mental scars, including a gnarly reptilian eye beneath an eyepatch that seems like an homage to Dr. Serizawa in the original ’54 Godzilla.

In this way, Noriko’s irradiated blood poisoning and Dr. Murakami’s tech become two halves of the same super weapon. When combined, they allow human beings the ability to turn Godzilla into their personal nuclear arsenal. It would essentially make Japan, or at least a grieving grandfather, a nuclear power able to start the war again against an occupying force.

This is the true “sin against nature” that Godzilla Minus Zero’s screenplay dances around when Kōichi and Mr. Noda debate the ethics of using Noriko to summon Godzilla. And it is the power Noda dreads Murakami clinging to beyond Ghidorah. He would seek to use it to destroy New York City and bring about a new era of war and suffering, and death at the magnitudes that took away Akiko’s biological parents, or Murakami’s granddaughter.

But it also would make Murakami another J. Robert Oppenheimer, the father of a technology that could reshape the world. Hence the U.S. government so aggressively wanting to take control of Murakami’s work and Noriko’s literal body…

A Change in Philosophy

Yet it should be noted that neither of Yamazaki’s Godzilla movies act as some kind of revisionist fantasy of a post-Second World War history. Like so much of modern Japanese media, it’s a reevaluation of the mindset that made such a cataclysmic event possible.

Consider Godzilla Minus One, a film that is a repudiation of both the government and the philosophy that led young men like Kōichi Shikishima to be strapped into kamikaze planes and sacrificed by the thousands at the altar of empire and conquest. The privates, the sailors, the cannon fodder like Kōichi who were considered too expendable to implement ejection seats during the war are the heroes of both Godzilla Minus One and its sequel. And like so much of Japan after living through loss, and perhaps more specifically being the only country to endure nuclear holocaust, they ultimately reject the old ways of doing things, including the martial values that were so highly prized for centuries in this country.

In Godzilla Minus Zero, Mr. Noda vocalizes that shift to Dr. Murakami when he visits him the night before the final confrontation with Ghidorah. He pleads with his friend to let go of his anger and hate, and his murderous dream of unleashing Godzilla on the U.S. It would just start up another war, and another grinder to chew up and spit out Japanese youth.

On a surface level, the dialogue between them is a standard “revenge will not free you of your grief,” but in the context of the film’s setting and worldview it continues Kōichi’s own journey: let go of the mindset, the dogma, the very philosophy that shapes your life. In 1949, Japan was very much in the midst of this exact journey. The fierce nationalistic militarism and imperialism that put young men in kamikaze planes—and also unleashed hell on Nanking, the Philippines, Singapore, and much else of East and Southeast Asia—was supplanted within a generation in favor of a nationwide embrace of antiwar pacifism.

There were no giant lizards or three-headed dragons, but the Mr. Nodas of the world extracted a promise from future generations, and even those grieving in the current one, to find a different path.

The Only Thing That Matters

It is worth pointing out that Godzilla Minus Zero’s great ethical debate—should mankind hold the power to control a creature like Godzilla, and then use it—is not the first time one of the movies in this series created a metaphor for nuclear power. The good Dr. Serizawa in the original 1954 movie similarly invented a world-ending technology to kill the O.G. big lizard. He called it “the Oxygen Destroyer.”

At the end of that movie, Serizawa succeeds at using it to kill Godzilla, but then he ultimately makes a decision that likely tracked for many Japanese audiences in 1954, not even a full decade removed from World War II. He killed himself and destroyed his research, ensuring his work never fell in the hands of any government or superpower that could use it to kill thousands.

The characters of Godzilla Minus Zero face a similar conundrum, even after Murakami agrees to not force Noriko into being a Godzilla whisperer. The superpower that dropped two nuclear bombs in wartime is still in control, and they still want this newfound power that Noriko’s blood unlocks. Hence the final, painful ending of the movie. For Murakami, it means refusing to share his research after he is arrested by the U.S. military. For our heroes, Kōichi and Noriko, it means a life of self-sacrifice and loss, not too dissimilar from Serizawa’s final choice. Which brings us back to poor little Akiko, standing atop a slide begging, pleading with her parents to have “a safe trip.”

… And they don’t leave her.

In what is sure to be a movie moment that lives on for years to come as a meme and coda, Kōichi, Noriko, and their daughter all cram onto a single motorcycle, attempting to make a run for it from the U.S. and the world—an attempt to spend as much time together as they can as a family before Noriko succumbs to her fate. And yet, despite those grim parameters, this is as happy and a feel-good ending as you can imagine. It’s like if The Dark Knight ended with none of the good guys dying, and them all stuffing onto the same motorcycle to ride into the dawn.

It’s a reversal of Serizawa’s choice and the original Godzilla movie, just as modern Japan seems to have removed itself from more ancient notions about warrior codes. In the aftermath and fallout of nuclear war, of ungodly and unnatural power raining down from the sky, previous priorities can seem trivial. All that matters are the family and friends you can hold, and maybe the better future you can squeeze onto the bike right next to you, journeying out in search of safe harbor and another safer trip.

Godzilla Minus Zero is in theaters now.

New Cliff Booth Trailer Addresses Once Upon a Time in Hollywood’s Biggest Problem

Quentin Tarantino‘s Once Upon a Time… In Hollywood is a celebration of all things Tinsel Town. Beyond its plot about fading star Rick Dalton (Leonardo DiCaprio) and his stunt double Cliff Booth (Brad Pitt) battling the Manson Family, the movie is a gift to fans of ’60s Hollywood. Unless you’re a fan of Bruce Lee, that is. In the most controversial scene of the movie, the slovenly Booth easily defeats Lee (Mike Moh), who comes off like an incompetent braggart.

Reducing the greatest film action star of all time to a jobber for Booth irritated Once Upon a Time‘s original viewers. So it’s shocking that the second trailer for the upcoming sequel The Further Mis-Adventures of Cliff Booth would remind us of it. Yet, throughout the trailer, various characters refer to Booth less as Rick Dalton’s stunt man and more as the guy who beat Bruce Lee. Fortunately, however, the trailer does offer some room for revision.

Set eight years after the events of Once Upon a Time… In Hollywood, The Further Mis-Adventures of Cliff Booth finds the titular stuntman looking for work after his partnership with Dalton has ended (“He got too fat,” says Booth in the trailer, probably on all that I-Talian food). Things seem to turn around when an agent (Elizabeth Debicki) for actor Charlie Peters (Scott Caan) calls him up for work. But what could the work be, given that Charlie does his own stunts? The trailer lets that question linger until its final moments, when Cliff hints that Peters has gotten caught up with some Filipino gangsters and needs help getting out. Cliff can help, because he beat up the Manson Family. And also Bruce Lee.

That last point seems of greater interest to the characters in the trailer, even more so than the fact that Cliff and Rick beat a group of Manson Family members (played by up-and-coming stars such as Austin Butler and Mikey Madison). Everyone from Peters’s wife Toni (Carla Gugino) to Blaxploitation star Hot Rod Harrison (Yahya Abdul-Mateen II) brings it up. For his part, Cliff tries to downplay the event, saying it was a long time ago, and had been exaggerated over the years.

In other words, Cliff is revising the story, which fits with the original movie’s theme. After all, Cliff and Rick’s heroics saved Sharon Tate (Margot Robbie) from the fate she suffered in our world. Revision is also a favorite theme of Tarantino’s. However, Tarantino only wrote the script for Cliff Booth, letting David Fincher step in to direct. And Fincher, who demands endless takes of one scene, is not known for being freewheeling and improvisational.

So what does that mean for the legend of Cliff Booth and the diminishment of Bruce Lee? We can’t tell from this trailer alone, but it is clear that the sequel isn’t afraid of making viewers as uncomfortable as its predecessor. But, then again, that’s Hollywood: sensational, unreliable, and ultimately pure fantasy.

The Further Mis-Adventures of Cliff Booth comes to theaters on November 25, 2026 and to Netflix on December 23, 2026.

How Ryan Gosling’s Ghost Rider Can Be Meaningfully Different From Nicolas Cage’s

The new Ghost Rider movie has many hurdles to overcome. Not only is it slated to release in the same year as the upcoming X-Men reboot and the conclusion to Ryan Coogler’s Black Panther trilogy, but it’s also dealing with the fact that two other actors have previously held the Spirit of Vengeance title. Nicolas Cage delivered a delightfully unhinged performance as Johnny Blaze in 2007’s Ghost Rider and Ghost Rider: Spirit of Vengeance, while Gabriel Luna brought a version of Robbie Reyes to life in Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. So how can star Ryan Gosling and director Shawn Levy make their take on Ghost Rider stand out?

The answer lies with the third character to don the mantle of Ghost Rider: Danny Ketch. Created by Howard Mackie and Javier Saltares, Danny’s turn as the Ghost Rider began, appropriately enough, with 1990’s Ghost Rider #1. After the criminal Deathwatch wounds his sister Barbara, Danny stumbles into a graveyard where he discovers a motorcycle that transforms him into the Ghost Rider. Naturally, he battles all sorts of wicked forces, including Blackheart – the son of Mephisto, who’s made a habit of creating Ghost Riders.

Danny Ketch is the reason why the Ghost Rider became such a popular character. Saltares’ sleek redesign, including giving Danny’s Hellcycle a more aerodynamic look and a spike-studded leather jacket, is extremely eye-catching. It also didn’t hurt that Danny made his debut at a time where darker, more morally ambiguous heroes were all the rage. Remember: he debuted in the same time period as Spawn.

Ketch is also the Ghost Rider who tends to team up with Marvel characters. In his early days, he crossed paths with the Punisher, Wolverine, and the X-Men, and helped form Marvel’s iconic supernatural team, the Midnight Sons. Perhaps the best team up came in Fantastic Four #347-349 by Walter Simonson and Arthur Adams, which featured Danny, Wolverine, Spider-Man and the Hulk becoming the “New Fantastic Four.” And who could forget the infamous moment from the 1994 Fantastic Four series where he one-shots Galactus with the Penance Stare? If the MCU plays its cards right, it could have a new set of ensemble movies on its hands with Ghost Rider.

If Gosling plays Danny Ketch, it would be a great way to set him apart from Cage and Luna’s performances. This would be a Ghost Rider whose life is upended by his new power. Danny has died twice while operating as Ghost Rider, and he would fully lose his sister to the malevolent Blackheart, making him far more tragic than his predecessor or successor. Danny and Johnny Blaze are also half-brothers, a bond that could add much-needed emotional heft to the movie. 

Additionally, some fans are speculating that Heated Rivalry star Connor Storrie might be Blackheart, giving Marvel Studios the chance to revisit a deadly rivalry. The fact that Sacha Baron Cohen recently played Mephisto in Ironheart only further hints that the crimson conniver’s spawn is lurking in the shadows.

Even one of Marvel Studios’ higher-ups wants to see Danny Ketch get his time to shine. During an interview with Collider, Marvel Television/Animation/Comics head Brad Winderbaum said that he would want to put Danny in his own series: “I would wanna do the Danny Ketch era of Ghost Rider.” 

Danny Ketch helped the Ghost Rider become a Marvel icon, and it’s time for him to ride again.