YouTube Horror Just Scored One of its Biggest Movie Adaptations Yet

Horror fans have been eating good recently. From breakout indie films to blockbuster revivals and a new wave of video games, the genre has been firing on all cylinders. Now, one of YouTube’s most influential horror series is making the leap to Hollywood, marking yet another mainstream milestone for horror. 

According to Deadline, Steven Spielberg is producing a feature film adaptation of The Mandela Catalogue, with Amblin Entertainment, United Artists, and Amazon MGM Studios set to produce it “following a highly competitive 11-studio bidding war.” The series creator, Alex Kister, is set to direct the film based on a screenplay he adapted with Tyler Clifton. 

The involvement of multiple major studios points to a clear and rapidly growing appetite for adapting internet-native horror properties. What was once a niche corner of YouTube storytelling is now being treated as viable big-screen IP, as seen with the success of Curry Barker’s Obsession and Kane Parson’s Backrooms, which have brought in $374 and $331 million, respectively, at the box office so far. 

Launched in 2021, The Mandela Catalogue is set in the fictional county of Mandela, Wisconsin, where reality is disrupted by beings known as “alternates.” Through instructional warning videos and found footage encounters, the alternates are shown to take the form of loved ones and friends with the goal of driving their victims to suicide. 

The series has since amassed well over 100 million views across its 19 episodes, the first installment of the series having 11 million views alone, cementing itself as one of the defining titles of the genre alongside Local 58, The Walten Files, Gemini Home Entertainment, and more. 

But despite its success, its selection for a Hollywood adaptation has sparked debate among YouTube analog horror fans, with some arguing that other analog series—like the ones listed above—should take priority given the controversy surrounding Kister.  

In March 2024, Kister became the subject of online controversy after allegations circulated on social media accusing him of inappropriate behavior involving fans, including claims of grooming and boundary violations. Kister denied the allegations, calling them false and defamatory, and said he would address them in further detail, which he later did, denying both the grooming claims and that the series was fetish content. 

The situation sparked widespread discussion across the analog horror community, with fans divided over the claims and fellow creators unsure about their ties with Kister, resulting in the crew of The Mandela Catalogue to quit and a terminated deal for a VHS release of the series with Retro Release. Later, in April, one of the accusers retracted the allegations, which led to Kister promising that the series would continue.

Still, the project underscores the turning point for horror as a whole, as another successful adaptation could open the door wider for more analog horror and internet-native storytelling to be adapted for film. 

At the same time, it raises questions about how these stories will translate beyond their original format going forward, with analog horror relying on fragmented storytelling, low-fidelity presentation, and audience interpretation that do not always map neatly into traditional cinematic structure. 

While Backrooms is now the prime example of how this kind of material can be adapted successfully, it remains to be seen how The Mandela Catalogue will handle the transition, as details about how faithful the film will be have not yet been revealed. 

Despite mixed feelings toward the series, The Mandela Catalogue represents one of the clearest signs that the horror genre is officially taking a turn towards niche, original, Gen Z-forward storytelling. Whether Hollywood fully understands what makes that kind of internet horror resonate, however, is a question that only the next wave of adaptations will be able to answer.

Supergirl Proves That the DCU Needs to Be Bigger than James Gunn

This article contains spoilers for Supergirl.

Even those of us who liked Supergirl can’t call the movie a coherent vision. In the same way that Supergirl herself was constantly depowered, Milly Alcock’s vulnerable and ferocious take on the Maid of Might was undercut time and again by clunky story choices, a bland aesthetic, and distracting needle drops, culminating with a rendition of Jimmy Eat World’s “The Middle” by indie artists Kelty Greye and KidMotel. Those last two points highlight the feeling that director Craig Gillespie was doing his own cover, emulating the work of DCU co-head James Gunn.

Turns out, Gunn did in fact influence the movie, but not necessarily by Gillespie’s choice. A postmortem published by The Hollywood Reporter revealed that DC Studios responded to unfavorable test screenings last winter by creating two cuts, one by Gillespie and one by the studio. Test audiences were shown both cuts, and while “the scores surprisingly dropped significantly” from when there was just one cut, the “studio’s inched out ahead of Gillespie’s.” The studio cut made it to theaters, and while the article only specifically identifies the inclusion of “The Middle” as his decision, it’s hard to imagine that Gunn didn’t drive that version. In light of this revelation, the problems in Supergirl only underscore the fact that the DCU needs to evolve past James Gunn if it wants to succeed.

Gunning for Success

It’s easy to see why Warner Bros. wants to lean so heavily on Gunn. Kevin Feige and Marvel have defined the modern superhero movie landscape, with Feige serving as the ultimate auteur. As demonstrated by his Guardians of the Galaxy movies, Gunn was one of the few who figured out how to maintain his voice within Feige’s system. Moreover, Gunn has both the knowledge and the passion for the deep cuts of DC Comics, bringing weirdos like Peacemaker and the Creature Commandos to the wider public. When Gunn proved that he could do a respectful, interesting take on Superman, a character far outside his wheelhouse, he seemed to cement his position as the right filmmaker to guide the DCU.

That reputation only grew as Gunn touted a creator-first approach that contradicted the Marvel factory. Gunn insisted that no project goes into production without a finished script and foregrounded his screenwriters, putting Supergirl screenwriter Ana Nogueira on the press tour alongside Alcock and Jason Momoa.

At first glance, the behind-the-scenes debacle of Supergirl seems to undercut Gunn’s ethos. Studio cuts, reshoots, and excessive marketing are nothing new to the world of big-budget, IP-driven filmmaking. But Gunn seemed above that, and if there’s truth to the claims of the unnamed sources quoted in Hollywood Reporter saying Gunn and Gillespie “were not creatively aligned,” then it appears that Gunn’s principles couldn’t resist standard studio operating procedure.

But the signs of problems were clear even before Supergirl started shooting. Gillespie has certainly had his hits, including the Oscar-winner I, Tonya and the Disney origin story Cruella, but it’s hard to say he has a distinctive voice. Or, if he does, it’s one similar to and lesser than Gunn’s: messy lead characters, a self-awareness, lots of needle drops. For the much-anticipated Batman flick The Brave and the Bold, Gunn chose director Andy Muschietti, a guy whose greatest successes might be getting It and The Flash to the screen after messy productions. The next DCU movie is Clayface, which boasts a script from the incredible Mike Flanagan, but is directed by James Watkins, a filmmaker whose best decision was to just let James McAvoy go nuts in Speak No Evil.

Crisis in the Gunn Universe

Looking at this list of filmmakers, it sure seems like Gunn hasn’t strayed from the Mighty Marvel Movie Method: get a bunch of journeymen to direct movies conceived by the studio head. Except it’s even worse, because Feige is very much a studio head and Gunn is very much a director.

Gunn has a take on DC Comics characters, and he knows how to bring out the best in them. Gunn never shies away from the inherent silliness of those who put on bright tights to fight crime, but he also treats them as three-dimensional figures, real people in an absurd world. Moreover, Gunn knows how to tackle heavy themes without ever becoming pedantic or sacrificing the fun of a superhero spectacle, as demonstrated by making Starro the Conqueror a weapon of mass destruction in The Suicide Squad or making black site prisons a key part of Superman.

Yet as wonderful as Gunn is at telling these stories, he’s not the only one who can do it. Even within the MCU, Taika Waititi and Ryan Coogler both managed to make superhero movies that felt personal. Certainly, nearly two decades after the launch of the MCU, other filmmakers have had their own wild ideas on superheroes. It’s time for Gunn to find them and give them the same freedom he affords himself. In particular, Gunn needs to find filmmakers who do not approach superheroes in the same way.

For all Gunn does right, he does have his limitations, and his raunchy sensibilities do clash with the fact that superheroes are fundamentally for kids. Surely, someone out there knows how to make an excellent kid-friendly DC movie that Gunn would have never imagined.

Elseworlds and Other Voices

Despite the disappointments of Supergirl and the concerns about the next few DCU movies, there is reason to hope that the universe will expand beyond its studio head’s perspective.

Of course, there’s The Batman Part II, a film that reflects the vision of director Matt Reeves and has no connections to the rest of the universe. This August sees the release of Lanterns, a show that does not at all feel like a James Gunn project. While TV vet Chris Mundy serves as showrunner, Lanterns also boasts as co-creators Tom King and Damon Lindelof, two guys know for their ideosyncratic (and sometimes infuriating, as anyone who read Heroes in Crisis will tell you) takes on established characters.

Even more exciting is Dynamic Duo, a movie about Robins Dick Grayson and Jason Todd. The film comes from animation studio Swaybox, who specializes in combining traditional animation with puppetry. Not only does it promise to be completely different from the usual superhero offerings, it will certainly appeal to kids in a way other DCU movies haven’t.

In light of these projects, it’s clear that the problems with Supergirl raise concerns for the DCU, but don’t yet signal the demise of Gunn’s tenure. You might even say we’re in the middle of the ride.

Supergirl is now playing in theaters.

Hands on With Onimusha: Way of the Sword – What’s New in Capcom’s Next Big Swing

From Resident Evil Requiem to Pragmata, Capcom has been having a banner year of delivering top-tier games that have been well-received by fans and critics alike. Now Capcom is looking to extend this trend with its next major title of the year, Onimusha: Way of the Sword, out this September for all major modern gaming platforms and the first brand-new title in the franchise in 20 years. While attending Summer Game Fest 2026, we got to play a new build of Way of the Sword three months ahead of the game’s launch and speak to director Satoru Nihei and producer Akihito Kadowaki.

This hands-on experience came shortly after Capcom released the public demo for Onimusha: Way of the Sword, which mirrored versions of the build that we saw and played at Summer Game Fest and Tokyo Game Show last year. The SGF 2026 build provided a much more extensive look at how the final game is shaping up, with a wide linear stage that let us explore this haunted vision of Kyoto as samurai Musashi Miyamoto, defeating enemies and discovering relics that helped him continue his quest. Last year’s build was one of the best-looking games at SGF 2025 and this year’s SGF build maintains that detailed visual fidelity and fast-paced swordplay.

This hands-on build culminated in a fierce boss battle against a hulking monster Rasho-gan, where we got to use combat mechanics, like the Break Issen technique allowing us to cleave through our opponents guard and inflict massive damage. Parrying and dodging incoming attacks required attention to timing but the difficulty wasn’t nearly as unforgivable as a soulslike title like Elden Ring or Sekiro: Shadows Die Twice, by design to make the experience fun and challenging, but still accessible. For the developers, it was important to reflect and recognize how action games have evolved since 2006’s Onimusha: Dawn of Dreams, while retaining the core elements, both aesthetically and in terms of gameplay, from the series.

“It’s been a long time since the last Onimusha game and the action genre has changed,” observes Nihei. “We really wanted to focus on something that would appeal to fans, with that classic feel, but that would also appeal to a new audience as well. We wanted to make this not just a new game in the Onimusha series but for the action game genre overall. To help it stand out and keep the core elements of the series, the Issen mechanic and soul absorption give it that Onimusha feel. But we’re also introducing things like clashing blades, a parry mechanic, and the new blade system.”

With players worldwide trying out Way of the Sword for themselves in the first public demo since the game was announced in December 2024 at The Game Awards. In reviewing player feedback, Capcom has noticed fans are enjoying the game’s combat system well, particularly its parrying and deflecting mechanics. Capcom has also taken note that some players feel the demo is much easier than fans were anticipating, especially compared to more difficult action titles, with Capcom noting that this early build was to make the demo more accessible to casual players than the final game itself.

“The demo is taken from a very early portion of the game and the demo has been custom-made,” explains Kadowaki. “We wanted to introduce all of Musashi’s abilities within the demo. There are actually abilities in the demo that you don’t get until much later in the game. When the real game comes out, those elements will be introduced gradually once you play through the game with more progressive care and provide more of a challenge to people who are core action game players.”

Reportedly in development since early 2020, Onimusha: Way of the Sword is finally poised to revive the long-dormant Capcom franchise for a new generation while providing fresh thrills to returning players. Kadowaki notes that much of the development time has been spent revamping and refining the game’s combat system and that’s what he’s most excited for players to experience for themselves when the final version of the game finally comes out. Having seen and played multiple early builds of the game for the better part of the past 12 months, I can confirm that, on top of the cinematic presentation, the precise combat is a clear highlight for Way of the Sword, something that Capcom put a lot of time and energy into.

“There was a lot of trial and error that went into making the system for this. Players can experience that in the demo and a lot of people have been enjoying that. I’m also excited for people to get their hands on the real game,” adds Nihei with one last tease. “There are a lot of really exciting bosses because that’s when the combat really feels like it’s coming alive.”

Developed and published by Capcom, Onimusha: Way of the Sword launches September 4 for PlayStation 5, Xbox Series X|S, Nintendo Switch 2, and PC.

Ranking Every Season of The Bear

Some have suggested that The Bear’s five seasons represent the five stages of grief.

The show begins with Carmen “Carmy” Berzatto (Jeremy Allen White) returning to his hometown of Chicago following the suicide of his brother Mikey (Jon Bernthal) and finding Mikey’s restaurant in disarray. Season 1 would be denial, as Carmy avoids the true reality of his loss by throwing himself into modernizing the restaurant. Season 2 would be anger, as Carmy argues with everyone and takes his pent-up rage out on the people trying to help him. Season 3? Bargaining, as Carmy tries to regain control of his life by setting impossible standards for the restaurant, while season 4 is where the depression, hopelessness and withdrawal set in as Carmy begins to realize that change must start from within. Season 5, then, would be acceptance, in which Carmy comes to terms with his situation and moves on.

Whether you believe any of that or not, The Bear touched a nerve when it first arrived, and many people became invested in Carmy, his journey, his family, and all the other complex characters that revolved around them. The show certainly had its ups and downs, but the actors’ performances were consistently wonderful, and it was a genuinely immersive TV experience that went way beyond its much-memed shouts of “corner!” or “hands!”

Now that it’s finished its run, we’re taking a look back at The Bear and ranking its five tumultuous seasons…

5. Season 3

The creatives behind The Bear began experimenting in season 3, as the series slowed down to explore its characters more deeply rather than relying on the kinetic energy of the first two seasons. The momentum that had built toward the restaurant’s chaotic opening at the end of season 2 suddenly juddered to a halt, even though the story picked up immediately after that diabolical night, with Carmy setting a list of “non-negotiables” for The Bear and deciding that the menu should change every night, setting up both a financially grim future for the eatery and himself for failure.

Still, season 3 had some great character-focused episodes. The Tina-centric “Napkins” revealed more of her shaky employment background and her first teary encounter with Mikey. Meanwhile, “Ice Chips” finally saw Sugar (Abby Elliott) work through her traumatic history with Donna (Jamie Lee Curtis) as she went into labor. But the slow storytelling of season 3 was definitely an issue for many returning viewers. The plot seemed stretched out and offered very little in the way of resolution. Carmy’s futile quest for perfection was compelling, yet threads were left dangling all season long, like Sydney (Ayo Edibiri) trying to decide her future, the restaurant review, and Carmy’s guilt over the end of his relationship with Claire (Molly Gordon).

It was all set up and no payoff, and it felt like half a season of TV dragged out over a whole one. The glacial pace was definitely less infuriating if you watched seasons 3 and 4 back-to-back, but if you were watching in real time, it was more than a little bit maddening. Some fans even started to question if The Bear had lost its edge.

4. Season 4

Pacing and storytelling issues lingered in season 4, but the show regained some of its lost momentum in the first episode when Uncle Jimmy (Oliver Platt) and Computer (Brian Koppelman) gave Carmy and the gang two months to turn the restaurant’s fate around, placing a countdown clock in the kitchen and demanding they get it together or they’d be forced to shut up shop. Though it suddenly had a clear, time-sensitive goal, season 4 was still caught somewhere between the fast-moving energy of season 2 and the introspection of season 3, drawing out conversations among the characters and creating plenty of long scenes where nothing really happened.

In terms of standout episodes, season 4 was also lacking. “Bears” was a fun jaunt to Tiff’s wedding, but it still felt fluffy and unnecessary. Elsewhere, there was healing between Carmy and Donna in “Tonnato” and between Carmy and Claire in “Scallop,” yet as the focus realigned with Carmy’s emotional journey, supporting characters were sidelined and their propulsive screen time sacrificed to guest stars like Brie Larson and Josh Hartnett, who didn’t really add anything to the show. As Carmy grew, characters like Richie (Ebon Moss-Bachrach), Sugar and Sydney were simply stuck in a holding pattern while the show dealt with the head chef’s issues.

3. Season 5

The Bear had a strong return to form in season 5, making for a satisfying conclusion to the series as everyone processed Carmy’s decision to leave the culinary industry. His realization that his gift didn’t actually have to be his fate felt like a good place to leave the character, with the ex- head chef still helping out at the restaurant and having more fun than he’s ever had, but still making room for Sydney to step up as The Bear’s new leader.

Focusing on a single high-pressure service as the restaurant ran low on staff, ingredients, and certainty, season 5 allowed the characters of The Bear to evolve rather than sink back into their old patterns within that pressurized environment, which made for frenetic and compelling viewing and recaptured some of the show’s early essence.

Sydney understood that she could be just as good as Carmy without making everyone else’s life hell, Richie found respect outside the restaurant and became an “international businessman,” finally ready for a relationship with Jessica (Sarah Ramos), and there was simply no interest in pursuing a romantic entanglement between Carmy and Sydney, something that fans of the show had mixed feelings about but was arguably the right choice, though the chemistry between chefs Marcus (Lionel Boyce) and Luca (Will Poulter) was off the charts and some felt it could have been an interesting development for the show to explore.

2. Season 1

The Bear was a breath of fresh air when it first landed in 2022, boasting an ensemble cast to die for and a unique energy that captured the pressure of the food service industry from the perspective of the workers behind the scenes, capitalizing on the critical acclaim and interest generated by Philip Barantini’s 2021 film, Boiling Point (which also went on to spawn a TV show).

While the amount of yelling took some getting used to, The Bear genuinely sought to offer viewers a host of complex characters who weren’t just “good” or “bad” but had experienced traumatic and life-changing events that needed to be processed and dealt with but weren’t, boiling over into their lives and relationships even as they tried to work together in chaotic circumstances.

Jeremy Allen White, Ayo Edibiri and Ebon Moss-Bachrach were quickly vaulted into stardom after playing their characters perfectly and would go on to scoop plenty of awards for their troubles. Carmy, Sydney, and Richie felt authentic and realistically flawed as the ghost of Jon Bernthal’s Mikey haunted them every step of the way. Every episode was a banger, and everyone, both in front and behind the camera, was firing on all cylinders as the show’s story of a renowned chef returning to manage his dead brother’s sandwich shop blossomed into a series where every character mattered and every second counted.

1. Season 2

We don’t think it’s too controversial to give season 2 of The Bear the top spot in this ranking. It gave us not only two exceptional episodes of the series but of television in general in “Forks” and “Fishes,” where the former gave Richie confidence and purpose at upscale restaurant Ever, while the latter showed us what Christmas used to be like in the Berzatto household and featured truly unforgettable performances from Jamie Lee Curtis as the family’s matriarch and a returning Jon Bernthal as Carmy and Sugar’s emotionally deteriorating big brother, Mikey. Marcus’ trip to Copenhagen amid his mother’s illness in “Honeydew” is also touching and inspired, as is Tina’s (Liza Colón-Zayas) journey through culinary school.

Though Carmy’s burgeoning romance with childhood friend Claire during this season proved divisive, it only added to the pressure he was putting on himself to make the restaurant soar and move past his trauma from Mikey’s death without properly dealing with it, all while trying to be a decent boyfriend when he didn’t really even have the capacity to function in a relationship.

Ultimately, season 2 built on the solid foundations of the first season to find greater depth in the show’s characters and careered into an agonizingly upsetting finale that saw Carmy’s self-destructive tendencies reach a crescendo while his pals in the restaurant continued to flourish. The acting, writing, and direction across the board here were simply peak TV.

15 Non-Horror Productions That Gave Us Some Terrifying Moments

Horror is the genre that we most expect to be unsettled by, so when it happens in a completely different genre, it lands in a deeper way. A single scene, creature, or sequence can suddenly shift the tone into genuine nightmare territory before the story moves on.

Those unexpected detours often stick with viewers far longer than traditional jump scares because they catch us completely off guard. These movies and shows weren’t marketed as horror, but each contains at least one unforgettable moment that could easily belong in the genre.

IMDb

Star Trek: The Next Generation, The Borg

The introduction of the Borg in “Q Who” permanently changed Star Trek. Their emotionless assimilation of entire civilizations and the body horror of turning people into cybernetic drones made them one of television’s most unsettling science fiction creations.

IMDb

Who Framed Roger Rabbit, Judge Doom’s Reveal

For most of the film, Judge Doom is simply an intimidating villain. His horrifying transformation into a shrieking, red-eyed Toon before being flattened and resurrected remains one of the most traumatizing moments in a family movie.

IMDb

Willy Wonka & the Chocolate Factory, The Tunnel Ride

The cheerful factory tour abruptly descends into chaos during Wonka’s boat ride through a dark tunnel. Disturbing imagery, frantic editing, and unsettling poetry create a sequence that feels more psychological horror than children’s fantasy.

IMDb

Pee-wee’s Big Adventure, Large Marge

Large Marge’s ghost story seems harmless until her face suddenly transforms into a grotesque claymation nightmare. The unexpected visual gag has startled generations of children watching what is otherwise an offbeat comedy.

IMDb

The NeverEnding Story, The Nothing

The Nothing isn’t a monster you can fight. It’s an unstoppable force that erases the world itself, culminating in Artax’s heartbreaking death in the Swamp of Sadness, one of fantasy cinema’s most haunting sequences.

IMDb

The Brave Little Toaster, The Air Conditioner

Early in the film, an angry air conditioner spirals into a terrifying emotional breakdown before exploding. The combination of screaming, distorted animation, and sudden violence catches viewers completely off guard.

IMDb

The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring, Bilbo’s Lunge

Bilbo’s brief attempt to grab the Ring from Frodo lasts only seconds, yet his monstrous face and animalistic snarl remain one of the trilogy’s biggest jump scares despite the films primarily being epic fantasy.

IMDb

Superman III, The Robot Transformation

When Vera is pulled into a supercomputer and transformed into a cybernetic servant, the film briefly abandons superhero adventure for unsettling body horror. The scene remains surprisingly disturbing for an otherwise lighthearted comic book movie.

IMDb

Pinocchio, Pleasure Island

The boys’ carefree vacation becomes terrifying as they slowly transform into donkeys. Their panic and inability to stop the change create one of Disney’s darkest and most unsettling animated sequences.

IMDb

Return to Oz, Princess Mombi’s Heads

Disney’s Return to Oz introduces Princess Mombi, who keeps a collection of living interchangeable heads. The eerie hall of sleeping faces creates a surreal nightmare unlike anything in most family fantasy films.

IMDb

The Secret of NIMH, The Great Owl

Mrs. Brisby’s encounter with the Great Owl unfolds like a gothic horror scene. The eerie setting, glowing eyes, ominous sound design, and the predator’s imposing presence make the sequence deeply unsettling.

IMDb

Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets, The Basilisk

The hidden basilisk stalking Hogwarts transforms parts of the film into a creature feature. Students are mysteriously attacked while an enormous serpent hunts unseen through the castle’s walls and pipes.

IMDb

Raiders of the Lost Ark, Opening the Ark

The climax shifts dramatically from adventure to supernatural horror as ghostly spirits transform into deadly apparitions. The melting faces and explosive deaths remain among the most shocking practical effects in a mainstream blockbuster.

IMDb

The Adventures of Mark Twain, The Mysterious Stranger

This claymation adaptation takes an unexpectedly dark turn when the Mysterious Stranger calmly creates and destroys tiny living people. His philosophical monologue and eerie appearance create an unforgettable nightmare sequence.

IMDb

The Dark Crystal, The Garthim Attack

Jim Henson’s fantasy suddenly becomes terrifying whenever the crab-like Garthim appear. Their relentless pursuit, mechanical movements, and ability to overwhelm entire villages give several scenes the feel of a full-fledged monster movie.

13 Images Taking You Behind the Scenes of Iconic ’80s Flicks

Movies have always been wonderful, from the golden age of cinema to even today, they keep pushing the envelope of what’s possible within the medium. Of course, when it comes to big budgeted films, nowadays it’s all mostly CGI, but that wasn’t the case back in the 80s.

This is why images from behind the scenes of that era are so interesting, since their practical effects and costumes took a long time to create. This allows us to have a glimpse of movie magic being developed before our eyes. Here are just a few pictures that show just how much work went into the films we know and love.

IMDb

The Thing

While the film aimed to be grotesque, there is a beauty in the hand crafted work that went into showing the shape-shifting alien. This makes it timeless, maintaining the same gruesome effect it had back in the day.

r/blankies

E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial

Humor exists even behind the scenes, since the people making movies need levity too. Here, we have director Steven Spielberg ‘washing’ his alien creation, E.T., in the set with the tub.

IMDb

Ghostbusters

Movies don’t have unlimited money, so when it came time to showcase a marshmallow man the size of a building, they couldn’t just make one. Instead, the filmmakers made a miniature of the creature and shot the scenes with a scaled down skyscraper.

r/BacktotheFuture

Back to the Future III

There isn’t much for an actor to do between one take and the next, so they might as well catch up on the daily news. This photo is of particular note since Michael Fox is dressed on his cowboy get-up, making the paper particularly anachronistic.

r/conan

The Goonies

Prosthetics take a good while to implement, so seeing the make-up process in action for this Goonies character is quite a sight. Of particular note is the animatronic eye, something today would definitely be solved with CGI.

r/80smovies

Labyrinth

The movie’s main story has Jennifer Connelly going through all kinds of exhaustive trials, so it is nice to see the actress had some levity between shots.

IMDb

Aliens

The Alien creature is part suit, part animatronic, something that needed constant adjustments between takes. Here, we have the people behind the scenes getting the creature ready for the next time they need it.

IMDb

Predator

Just like with the Alien, the Predator is also portrayed by a person in a suit. A particularly tall person, but a real human nonetheless, and fortunately for him the face can come off so he can breathe with ease.

IMDb

Who Framed Roger Rabbit

In the film, real life actors interact constantly with cartoons, but they need something tangible to interact with for the performances to work. Here we see how the cartoon vehicles were handled by the production.

IMDb

Beetlejuice

Makeup work requires not only expertise from the makeup artist, but utmost patience from the actor, since they need to spend hours upon hours just sitting down. Michael Keaton at least had a comparatively easy time when thinking about the other movies covered here.

r/80s

Neverending Story

The two main characters of the Neverending Story go through a lot of challenges, and don’t really meet much during the movie. It’s nice then to see them as the kids they are in a heartfelt photo.

r/80smovies

Robocop

Actors aren’t really wounded during films, that much we know. But they also have a say in how they look with their scars on, participating openly in the process of making their character look as weak, dangerous or whatever the film needs them to be.

IMDb

Honey, I Shrunk the Kids

The movie’s title requires the children of the movie to be smaller than bugs, but of course, that’s difficult to showcase. Therefore, the film made animatronics that were bigger than most people, creating an impressive effect on camera.

15 Big Actors Who Starred in Roles Where You Can’t Tell It’s Them

Actors are public figures, and their faces tend to sell movies as much as the premise or spectacle can. Audiences latch on to a performance, so when they like a given person enough, they’ll go watch anything with them on it. That is, when you can tell the actor is in the movie or show.

There are times where films hide their biggest stars behind make-up, voice work, or something as simple as never removing a mask. It’s not that they’re completely hidden, but unless you go out of your way to know who’s who, you could go the whole film without realizing the biggest names attached to them.

IMDb

Vin Diesel as Groot (Guardians of the Galaxy)

Vin Diesel provides the voice of Groot, speaking variations of only three words throughout the Marvel films. Between the motion-captured tree design and limited dialogue, many casual viewers never realize it’s him.

IMDb

Pedro Pascal as Din Djarin (The Mandalorian)

Pedro Pascal stars as the Mandalorian, yet his face is hidden beneath a helmet for nearly the entire series. Stunt performers also portray the armored bounty hunter in many action scenes, further masking his presence.

IMDb

Colin Farrell as Oz Cobb (The Penguin)

Colin Farrell is virtually unrecognizable beneath extensive prosthetic makeup as Oz Cobb in The Batman and The Penguin. His dramatic physical transformation is so convincing that many viewers don’t recognize him until the credits.

IMDb

Doug Jones as the Amphibian Man (The Shape of Water)

Doug Jones has built an entire career playing heavily made-up creatures. As the Amphibian Man in The Shape of Water, elaborate prosthetics completely conceal his appearance while allowing his expressive physical performance to shine.

IMDb

Bill Nighy as Davy Jones (Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man’s Chest)

Bill Nighy never physically wore the octopus-faced makeup audiences see. Instead, his motion-capture performance was transformed into the unforgettable CGI pirate captain, making his recognizable features disappear almost entirely.

IMDb

John Leguizamo as The Clown (Spawn)

John Leguizamo is almost impossible to recognize as the grotesque clown known as The Clown. Buried beneath heavy prosthetics, exaggerated makeup, and a completely transformed voice, he disappears into one of the film’s most memorable villains.

IMDb

Emma Thompson as Nanny McPhee (Nanny McPhee)

Emma Thompson wrote and starred in Nanny McPhee, but extensive prosthetics, facial warts, a bulbous nose, and crooked teeth make her nearly unrecognizable. The magical nanny’s appearance gradually changes as the story progresses.

IMDb

Hugo Weaving as Megatron (Transformers)

Hugo Weaving voices Megatron throughout the live-action Transformers films. With the villain appearing entirely as CGI and speaking through a heavily processed robotic voice, few viewers immediately recognize the acclaimed actor behind him.

IMDb

Nicole Kidman as Virginia Woolf (The Hours)

Nicole Kidman underwent an extraordinary physical transformation to portray author Virginia Woolf. A prosthetic nose, subtle aging makeup, and completely altered mannerisms made her nearly unrecognizable, earning her the Academy Award for Best Actress.

IMDb

Benedict Cumberbatch as Smaug (The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug)

Benedict Cumberbatch performed Smaug using motion capture and voice acting. Once transformed into the enormous dragon, almost none of his physical appearance remains visible despite his unmistakably commanding performance.

IMDb

Alan Tudyk as Hei Hei (Moana)

Alan Tudyk voices Hei Hei, the dimwitted rooster in Disney’s Moana. Rather than speaking dialogue, he contributes little more than comedic squawks and clucks, making his participation almost impossible to recognize.

IMDb

Frank Oz as Yoda (The Empire Strikes Back)

Frank Oz doesn’t appear on screen at all, instead bringing Yoda to life through puppeteering and voice performance. The seamless illusion helped audiences believe they were watching a living Jedi Master rather than a puppet.

IMDb

Tim Curry as Darkness (Legend)

Tim Curry disappears beneath one of cinema’s most elaborate prosthetic makeup creations as Darkness. The massive horns, crimson skin, and towering costume make it nearly impossible to recognize the actor beneath the transformation.

IMDb

John Rhys-Davies as Gimli (The Lord of the Rings)

John Rhys-Davies spent hours in elaborate dwarf makeup and prosthetics to play Gimli. The transformation was so extensive that many viewers fail to recognize the actor, who also voiced Treebeard in the trilogy.

IMDb

Charlize Theron as Aileen Wuornos (Monster)

Charlize Theron underwent a remarkable physical transformation to portray serial killer Aileen Wuornos. Prosthetic makeup, weight gain, altered teeth, and completely different body language made the Oscar-winning performance almost impossible to recognize as the glamorous star.

15 Actors Who Refuse to Take Part in the Media Circus

Celebrity drama sells, hence why there are so many media outlets and online magazines dedicated solely to that. The only way to fuel drama, however, is to engage with it, and several actors have taken the wise decision to not engage with any of that. Some barely appear on the public eye beyond press tours.

This means that we can only judge them for their work, and it makes their career all the better for it. These actors have built successful careers while largely steering clear of the media circus that surrounds so much of modern Hollywood.

IMDb

Daniel Day-Lewis

Daniel Day-Lewis has long avoided the spotlight outside his films. He rarely gives interviews, has no public social media presence, and is known for disappearing from public life between projects, allowing his performances to remain the primary focus.

IMDb

Michelle Pfeiffer

Michelle Pfeiffer has long maintained one of Hollywood’s most private careers. Although she occasionally promotes new projects, she has largely avoided celebrity feuds, tabloid drama, and the constant media exposure that accompanies many stars of her stature.

IMDb

Cillian Murphy

Despite becoming one of Hollywood’s biggest stars, Cillian Murphy avoids social media and rarely discusses his personal life. He has repeatedly said he prefers audiences to focus on his work rather than his off-screen persona.

IMDb

Mia Wasikowska

After rising to prominence with films like Alice in Wonderland, Mia Wasikowska deliberately stepped away from Hollywood’s promotional culture. She has spoken about valuing privacy and limiting the amount of attention devoted to her personal life.

IMDb

Joaquin Phoenix

Joaquin Phoenix has never embraced celebrity culture. Although he participates in promotional interviews when necessary, he generally avoids discussing his private life and rarely engages in the kind of publicity that dominates entertainment headlines.

IMDb

Frances McDormand

Frances McDormand has built an acclaimed career while remaining largely uninterested in celebrity culture. She gives relatively few interviews, avoids unnecessary publicity, and consistently shifts attention back to filmmaking rather than herself.

IMDb

Viggo Mortensen

Viggo Mortensen keeps an unusually low public profile for an actor of his stature. Outside of promoting films or discussing his artistic interests, he rarely participates in celebrity gossip or high-profile media appearances.

IMDb

Ryan Gosling

Ryan Gosling has built one of Hollywood’s most successful careers while staying largely out of the celebrity spotlight. He has no public social media accounts, rarely comments on industry drama, and keeps interviews focused on his work rather than his private life.

IMDb

Christopher Walken

Christopher Walken has famously avoided modern celebrity culture. He does not use social media, has said he doesn’t own a cellphone, and generally limits his public appearances to projects he’s actively promoting.

IMDb

Denzel Washington

Denzel Washington has consistently avoided public feuds and celebrity gossip throughout his career. While he regularly promotes his films, he rarely comments on Hollywood drama and keeps his family life largely out of the spotlight.

IMDb

Emily Blunt

Emily Blunt maintains a careful separation between her public career and private life. She has no public social media accounts and generally avoids discussing her family, preferring interviews to remain centered on her work.

IMDb

Christian Bale

Christian Bale is known for immersing himself in his roles rather than cultivating a celebrity image. Outside of film promotions, he gives relatively few interviews and has consistently kept his personal life out of public view.

IMDb

Keanu Reeves

Despite worldwide fame, Keanu Reeves remains remarkably private. He avoids social media, seldom comments on celebrity controversies, and has earned a reputation for quietly going about his work without seeking constant public attention.

IMDb

Glenn Close

Across a career spanning decades, Glenn Close has largely avoided the tabloid spotlight. Her public appearances are typically tied to professional work or advocacy, rather than the kind of personal drama that fuels celebrity news.

IMDb

Michael Caine

Throughout his long career, Michael Caine largely avoided Hollywood feuds and tabloid controversies. Known for his professionalism, he focused on acting rather than cultivating a larger-than-life public persona, even after becoming an international star.

The 15 Horror Flicks That Keep Us Up at Night the Most

There are plenty of movies that are meant to be scary, with gore to impact us and jump scares to startle us. Yet not all of them stay with us after the credit’s roll, making us second guess every shadow in our house late at night. That level of horror is deeper, more personal.

If you don’t mind not sleeping for about a week, we have a selection of movies that touch on that level of horror. Some, of course, are classics that you’ve probably seen dozens of times. But you’re likely to find at least one film that will keep you up at night, something that shooks you to your core.

IMDb

The Exorcist

William Friedkin’s classic remains terrifying because it grounds its supernatural horror in an ordinary family. The unsettling transformation of Regan and the film’s deeply serious tone continue to disturb audiences decades after its release.

IMDb

Hereditary

Grief, family trauma, and occult horror combine to create an overwhelming sense of dread. Ari Aster slowly builds toward a devastating finale that leaves viewers questioning whether the characters ever had any chance of escaping their fate.

IMDb

The Babadook

On the surface, it’s a monster movie. Beneath that, it’s an exploration of grief, depression, and parenthood. The Babadook becomes frightening because it represents emotions that can’t simply be defeated or locked away forever.

IMDb

The Witch

Set in 1630s New England, Robert Eggers’ film creates terror through isolation, religious paranoia, and mounting distrust. Every unsettling moment feels historically grounded, making the family’s slow unraveling especially believable and unnerving.

IMDb

The Ring

The cursed videotape and Samara’s unforgettable emergence from the television became horror landmarks. More importantly, the film creates a persistent feeling that ordinary technology can become a conduit for something impossibly malevolent.

IMDb

It Follows

A relentless supernatural entity walks toward its victims at a steady pace, never stopping and never tiring. That simple premise creates constant anxiety, turning every distant figure in the background into a potential threat.

IMDb

The Others

Alejandro Amenábar’s gothic ghost story relies on silence, shadows, and uncertainty rather than loud scares. Its carefully constructed mystery culminates in a revelation that encourages viewers to immediately reconsider everything they previously witnessed.

IMDb

The Sixth Sense

M. Night Shyamalan’s supernatural drama balances emotional storytelling with lingering unease. Its famous twist doesn’t diminish the horror. Instead, it makes earlier scenes even more unsettling upon a second viewing.

IMDb

The Descent

A caving expedition becomes increasingly terrifying long before the creatures appear. The suffocating tunnels, darkness, and claustrophobic atmosphere are enough to make many viewers uncomfortable even without the film’s monstrous inhabitants.

IMDb

Jacob’s Ladder

Blending psychological horror with surreal imagery, Jacob’s Ladder constantly blurs reality and hallucination. Its disturbing visuals and emotionally devastating ending continue to inspire discussion about trauma, death, and the nature of perception.

IMDb

The Wicker Man (1973)

This folk horror classic builds tension through cheerful normalcy instead of obvious menace. The contrast between the island’s welcoming atmosphere and its increasingly disturbing customs leads to one of horror’s most unforgettable endings.

IMDb

Pulse

Kiyoshi Kurosawa’s Japanese horror masterpiece links loneliness with supernatural intrusion through the internet. Its quiet pacing and haunting imagery create a profound sense of existential dread that lingers far beyond the final scene.

IMDb

Lake Mungo

Presented as a documentary, Lake Mungo unsettles viewers by mixing grief with subtle supernatural elements. Rather than relying on constant scares, it gradually reveals disturbing details that become more haunting in retrospect.

IMDb

Session 9

An abandoned asylum provides the perfect setting for creeping psychological horror. As the workers uncover disturbing recordings, the line between external evil and internal breakdown becomes increasingly difficult to distinguish.

IMDb

Skinamarink

Using static shots, darkness, and sparse dialogue, Skinamarink recreates the childhood fear of being alone in a house at night. Its unconventional approach has divided audiences, but many find its atmosphere uniquely unsettling.

15 Big Celebs from the 1970s We Rarely Hear About Anymore

The 1970s produced a huge wave of celebrities who dominated film, television, and music during their peak years, yet many of them have gradually faded from mainstream conversation. While they were once constant figures in pop culture, appearing on magazine covers and leading major productions, time and changing trends shifted attention toward newer generations of stars. Some continued working quietly, others stepped away entirely, and many simply became less visible to younger audiences. Despite this, their influence during the decade helped shape entertainment history in meaningful ways, even if their names are not mentioned as often today.

IMDb

William Holden

A major star transitioning from earlier decades into 70s cinema. His later career is less remembered compared to his peak years.

IMDb

Tuesday Weld

A frequent presence in 70s film and television with strong critical attention. Her visibility has declined despite a solid body of work.

IMDb

Susan Dey

Rose to fame through television success in the early 70s. Her popularity was closely tied to that era’s TV landscape.

IMDb

Stacy Keach

A respected actor with strong roles in crime and drama films. His 70s work helped establish a long career in television and film.

IMDb

Sally Field

Became a household name in the 70s through television and early film success. Her career continued strongly, but her early era is often overlooked today.

IMDb

Ryan O’Neal

Rose to fame through romantic dramas that defined early 70s Hollywood. His peak popularity was closely tied to that specific era.

IMDb

Peter Fonda

A counterculture icon whose work helped define late 60s and 70s cinema. His cultural relevance peaked during a very specific period.

IMDb

Karen Carpenter

One half of The Carpenters, whose voice defined soft pop of the era. Her legacy remains strong but her name is less frequently mentioned today.

IMDb

Karen Black

A standout character actress in 70s genre films and dramas. Her versatility made her a recognizable face during the decade.

IMDb

John Saxon

Known for supporting roles across multiple genres throughout the 70s. He was a consistent screen presence during the decade.

IMDb

John Ritter

Began gaining recognition in the late 70s before becoming a major TV figure. His early career is often overshadowed by later sitcom success.

IMDb

James Caan

A major 70s film presence known for powerful roles in crime dramas and character driven stories. His work helped define a tough, emotional acting style in that decade.

IMDb

Jacqueline Bisset

A major international film star with strong visibility in 70s cinema. Her global fame was significant but has faded from mainstream memory.

IMDb

Charles Bronson

A dominant action star of the 70s known for intense and stoic roles. His films were hugely popular during the decade but are less discussed now.

IMDb

Bo Derek

Became a cultural phenomenon late in the 70s with an instantly recognizable image. Her fame was intense but relatively short lived.

House of the Dragon Season 3 Episode 3 Review: Heavy Is the Head

This review contains spoilers for House of the Dragon season 3 episode 3.

You ever of have of those days? Well, Rhaenyra Targaryen – Queen on the Iron Throne, former Princess of Dragonstone, the Realm’s Gods Damned Delight – is having one of those days.

Not even 24 hours since the taking of King’s Landing, Rhaenyra (Emma D’Arcy) discovers that King’s Landing is very annoying. Before getting lost at sea in heavy armor, master of coin Ser Tyland Lannister emptied the Red Keep’s treasury and now the crown has no money. King Aegon II remains missing in action but his legacy lives thanks to the rats that now swarm the city, thriving without any living rat catchers to stop them. The High Septon refuses to publicly coronate Rhaenyra as the Faith of the Seven isn’t so sure the last king is dead yet.

What’s more: seemingly everyone in Rhaenyra’s orbit wants something from her. Hand of the Queen Corlys Velaryon (Steve Toussaint) wants his bastard sons legitimized. Hugh the Hammer (Kieran Bew) wants a place to live. Prince Daemon (Matt Smith) wants Rhaenyra to kill their new Green hostage Daeron (it must be noted that his offscreen reminder of “you still have to kill Daeron” is probably the season’s biggest laugh line yet). Even the smallfolk – hungry, desperate, and increasingly bold – get in on the petitioning, requesting 500 gold dragons that the crown doesn’t have to replenish the capital’s supply of sheep. If this back-of-the-napkin math from Reddit is to be believed, that’s a request of nearly $6 million. For wool and mutton!

All of these entreaties to Rhaenyra’s newly-won authority begin early in House of the Dragon season 3 episode 3 and never really stop. Viserys’ headstrong daughter feels the weight of the crown before she’s even worn it to her coronation yet. And thanks to plenty of Sorkin-esque walking-and-talking, there’s nowhere in the Red Keep she can go to escape it. Even when the day ends, she must retreat to the bed her father wasted away in. She opts to snuggle up with Daemon instead.

Though House of the Dragon‘s third season kicked off with two season finale-level episodes that feature some of the most consequential moments from George R.R. Martin’s Fire & Blood, this is the first hour in which the show truly feels like itself again. At its best, any Game of Thrones story is about the frustrating impossibility of governance. And governance has rarely felt more frustrating or impossible than it does for Rhaenyra here.

Even before she gets her period.

Creature of the internet that I am, I suspect that Rhaenyra’s cramps will generate some online headlines, with some arguing that her discomfort while trying to perform her queenly duties is at odds with the show’s feminist inclinations. As someone who does not have a menstrual cycle, I cannot really assess the accuracy of the Rhaenyra’s pain. It is clear, however, that writer Sara Hess’ script approaches the moment carefully and empathetically. This isn’t a case of Rhaenyra opining that “I was gonna be a good queen today but then my genitals got in the way.” It’s just one more irritation heaped upon the beginning of a reign that has not gone the way she hoped.

Of course, Rhaenyra’s despair only feels this acute because of how complete her victory initially seemed. Usually when the monarch makes it to the other side of the board, the game is over and the pieces put away. The opening scene of this week’s episode appears to be an acknowledgment of this reality at first. When Daemon, Hugh, Ulf (Tom Bennett), and their respective dragons arrive in the Riverlands to address Lord Ormund’s army, everyone has good reason to believe that this struggle is over.

Daemon tells Lord Ormund (James Norton) as such, summing up the situation succinctly, “Glad news, Lord Ormund! The war is ended, your allies have scattered, and your nephew’s fled. There is a new queen and she sits her father’s throne.” Ormund takes the words as intended, consenting to take his massive, impeccably assembled army home and send the queen’s son Daeron (played by Charlie Gordon…but not really) and his dragon Tessarion off to King’s Landing as honored guests (re: hostages).

Following my muted reaction to episode 2, if House of the Dragon thought it could win me back with a glitzy cold open, then… it was absolutely right. The pre-credits sequence of this episode is a perfect table-setter. It’s also an equally perfect bookend with the episode’s final moments in which the “Daeron” in King’s Landing is revealed to be a fraud and Rhaenyra discovers that Lord Ormund’s forces have taken Tumbleton, a small market town in the Reach with no strategic value other than forcing the new queen to decide whether she should lay fiery siege to her subjects. The episode slyly dropping that Hugh’s wife absconded to Tumbleton in search of safety and food amid Aegon’s reign adds a layer of emotional resonance to the incoming decision. It also adds some dramatic tension for those familiar with the source material.

This is a consistently tense, thematically on point episode of House of the Dragon but it’s also a particularly funny one. I already made mention of Daemon’s hectoring Rhaenyra that she needs to kill a child, delivered with the same energy as if he were reminding her about a dentist’s appointment. But it really can’t be overstated just how vibrant and entertaining Daemon has become now that he’s away from his spooky misadventures in Harrenhal. Similarly funny is Rhaenyra immediately emerging from her overwhelmed fugue state to assert “Oh absolutely not” when Ulf proposes that he style himself as “Ulf Targaryen.” He settles for Ulf the White.

Even the sensitive issue of Corlys wanting Rhaenyra to legitimize his bastards takes on some comedic energy due to the show’s shrewd creative decision to cast Black actors for the Velaryon family. While House of the Dragon never needed complicated lore or storytelling justifications to change the race of some of its characters (at least not from me), the fact that Velaryons have a markedly different skin tone from Targaryens has paid real dramatic and comedic dividends in a world that relies on family inheritance for political legitimacy. When Corlys makes the stunning reveal to Rhaenyra that the two son-aged men who look very much like his sons are, in fact, his sons, she replies with a measured “I did not guess though I believe I see it now.” Well done, Rhae. He suspected nothing.

Moments like these affirm that House of the Dragon is at its best when it’s getting the little things right. But translating the bigger, more operatic moments remains a bit of a struggle. For, as satisfying as Corlys’ initial chat with Rhaenyra is, his swift and final repudiation of her when she doesn’t come through with what he wants is less effective.

“Your son Joffrey is a bastard. Your son, Lucerys, who I accepted as my heir, was a bastard. Your son Jacaerys lived and died a bastard,” Those are big, BIG words to say to any monarch. Notably the last Velaryon who said anything approaching that got his head cleaved in half. Yes, Rhaenyra is not quick to anger or as proficient with a sword as Daemon, but even factoring in her tenuous grasp on power at the moment a non-response doesn’t quite read as right.

Similarly ineffective is the episode’s biggest “setpiece” – the rat dinner fed to the nobles of King’s Landing. While both clever and visually striking, serving grilled rats to former Green supporters and raiding their storehouses rather than, you know, killing them goes beyond mere strategic miscalculation and straight into poor characterization.

In some ways the scene is emblematic of the biggest challenge facing showrunner Ryan Condal, writer Sara Hess, and the rest of the House of the Dragon team. One can’t always faithfully translate the nuances of Medieval-era politics into popular art without it coming across as boring. Lean too far into the spectacle, however, and you get nerds pushing up their glasses and issuing in a stern “well ackshully.” And here I am, well ackshully-ing a nice rat supper.

In any case, Rhaenyra’s Robin Hood act plays well with the smallfolk for now. But as this episode makes clear, King’s Landing is very much a “what have you done for me lately?” kind of city. And with the last of the Hightower banners taken down in the capital, King’s Landers will know precisely who to blame once the price of sheep reaches 501 gold dragons.

New episodes of House of the Dragon season 3 premiere Sundays at 9 p.m. ET on HBO and HBO Max, culminating with the finale on August 9.

My Adventures With Superman’s Superboy Rewrite Introduces an Important Character

This article contains spoilers for My Adventures With Superman season 3 episode 4.

The reign of the Supermen is upon us. By the end of “Guess Who’s Slammin’ to Dinner?” both Superboy and the Cyborg Superman had entered the world of My Adventures with Superman. With John Henry Irons a.k.a. Steel introduced in previous seasons, and the Cyborg Superman also borrowing elements from the Eradicator, all four characters introduced in the 1993 DC Comics crossover Reign of the Supermen are now accounted for, setting up an epic battle that will play out in the next episode.

The Cyborg Superman isn’t the only character to be reimagined in My Adventures with Superman. The Superboy we meet here looks like Conner Kent, the clone of Superman and Lex Luthor who debuted in the Reign of the Superman storyline. But as he immediately reveals to a shocked Lois and Clark, he is in fact Jon Kent, sent from a dark future by unlikely ally Lex to change the past. By bringing Jon Kent into the mix, My Adventures With Superman acknowledges the most important advancement to Superman since the 1980s: his role as a father.

The Coming of the Superboy

Reign of the Supermen stems from the infamous Death of Superman storyline from 1992. After Superman sacrificed his life to stop the rampage of the murderous Doomsday, the four new Supermen arrived to take his place, including a young snot-nosed clone who insisted that people call him “Superman.” Eventually, the clone accepted the name Superboy and enjoyed his own series for several years, and also served as a founding member of Young Justice. Eventually, he matured a bit, took the Kryptonian name Kon-El and the human name Conner and spent some time with the Kents and the new Teen Titans.

Jon Kent also comes from a Superman death, but a much more convoluted one. In 2016’s Superman #52, by Pete Tomasi with Mikel Janín and Miguel Sepulveda, Superman dies fighting an imposter with energy-based powers, a death that is final and unreversed. By the end of that story, we never see him again.

But here’s the thing, that’s the Superman introduced in the New 52 reboot from 2011, an extension of the Flashpoint storyline in which the Flash rearranged the world after an adventure through time. In 2011, DC presented the New 52 as the mainline universe, insisting that all previous stories and iterations never happened. But in the 2015 event Convergence, the New 52 Superman learns that the Superman from the previous reality, the one who has existed since the first DC reboot Crisis on Infinite Earths and remained more or less unchanged through the next reboots Zero Hour and Infinite Crisis (DC reboots kind of a lot), still lives in a pocket dimension. He’s still married to Lois Lane and, more importantly for our purposes, they have a son, Jonathan Samuel Kent.

Before his death, the New 52 Superman reached out to the previous Superman, who had since entered the mainline DC continuity and had been living a quiet life with his family outside of Metropolis. Donning the black costume he wore at the end of the Reign of the Superman storyline, the original Superman joined the New 52 Superman’s fight, and when the latter died, the former slowly made his way back into the world, and is now just the regular old Superman. But as he did, he brought Jon with him, and has become the best version of Superman in years.

Ask any writer or even some fans, and they’ll tell you the biggest challenge facing Superman is that he’s too powerful, too perfect. To write an interesting story, you have to depower him or corrupt his morals, decisions that too often undermine the very nature of the character.

The Adventures of Superdad

With the introduction of Jon, Superman faced a totally new challenge, one not even explored during the brief period when he had adopted young Kryptonian Christopher Kent in 2006 (part of a tie-in to Superman Returns, the movie in which the Man of Steel became a deadbeat dad).

First of all, the addition of a son makes Superman vulnerable in a way that he never was before. Lois Lane generally does not have powers to defend herself, but she’s also a grown woman whose fearlessness is part of her character. She is not defined by the protection offered by Superman, even if he rescues her on a regular basis. The same logic cannot be extended to Jon, even though the boy does have powers. When Superman makes decisions now, he must first consider how it will affect someone who does not have his own agency.

Second, raising Jon allows us to examine Superman’s morals from another perspective. Throughout the excellent 2017 run by Tomasi, Dan Jurgans, Patrick Gleason, and Doug Mahnke, Superman had to teach Jon not just how to fly or shoot lasers from his eyes, but also how to interact with a world that could break so easily, how to think about defending others first.

Finally, as Jon grew into his own, he redefined central Superman tropes. The Super Sons, in which Jon joined forces with the snotty pre-teen Robin Damian Wayne gave us a look at a gleeful, energetic Kryptonian on Earth, someone who loved adventure and could make a few mistakes. Even after Brian Michael Bendis‘ decision to age Jon to young adulthood took the Super Sons off the board, writers such as Tom Taylor and Grant Morrison positioned Jon as the Superman of the future, acknowledging that Superman, perfect though he may be, belongs to a certain age, and it must fall on the next generation to continue the never-ending battle for truth, justice, and a better tomorrow.

In current continuity, the young Jon Kent has returned, thanks to the older Jon Kent in disguise as a futuristic hero called Tomorrow Man, and already the storytelling possibilities are endless.

A Better Tomorrow

Of course, the Jon who arrives in My Adventures with Superman meets a Lois and Clark at the start of their careers. As demonstrated by the anxiety that Lois feels in “Guess Who’s Slammin’ to Dinner?” they haven’t even established themselves as people, and don’t need the reinvention that Jon brings with him.

But the mere presence of Jon Kent in the show reminds us that he’s an important part of Superman lore from now on, one that only makes Superman a more complicated and satisfying character.

My Adventures With Superman airs new episodes on Adult Swim and HBO Max every Saturday at midnight.

5 Shows About British People Being Miserable to Celebrate the Fourth of July

First of all, congratulations. You did it. Two-hundred and fifty years ago, you adopted the Declaration of Independence and ditched Great Britain. You put your foot down. And you were right to do it. We were toxic and we weren’t making you happy.

I’d love to say we learned, healed, and grew from the experience, but honestly, we didn’t. In the interest of transparency, we were down bad for some time. Oh, we carried on bossing other countries around for a while, doing despicable things. We pottered around with our little inventions, like steam engines, the National Health Service, and the web. We tried to keep ourselves busy, not dwell on it. But the truth is, we were always four or five gin-and-tonics away from texting “u up?”

Don’t get us wrong, we’re comforted by the knowledge that we’ve managed to rebuild our trust with you since then. Even now, did you see? Look, it’s Harry Styles. Tom Holland. Dua Lipa. John Oliver. Sorry about James Corden and Piers Morgan, but we’ve still got something to offer, haven’t we? Perhaps you can admit we have a place in your heart these days. No pressure. Just when (and if) you’re ready. We’ll be here. Probably. There’s a lot going on, actually. We’re on our sixth prime minister in 10 years, with a seventh on the way. But that’s not your fault. We just can’t find much to be happy about anymore. We’re restless. It happens when you’re on an island.

Truth be told, we’ve become quite preoccupied with self-pity as a country most days. Moaning has become a national pastime. We love nothing more than complaining. Even on the happiest day of our lives, we’ll find something. And when we’re desperate, we always have the weather to blame, because there are only about three days a year here when the weather’s perfectly fine. Even then, we can check the forecast, see a dark cloud in the future, and say, “Ah, this won’t last.” Great Britain has embraced the role of Marvin the Paranoid Android.

Our TV often reflects our despair, too. There are the long-running soaps where we watch terrible things happening to regular people, especially on Christmas. The most wonderful time of the year? Not on our watch, mate. Even our sitcoms can drown in melancholia. We don’t deserve laughter at the end of the day; we need to remind ourselves of that.

To celebrate your independence, America, here are five TV shows you can watch whenever you even think about picking up the phone and saying “I miss us.” Set those boundaries and stick to them. Preserve your peace.

EastEnders

EastEnders has been broadcasting here on the BBC since 1985. At the moment, the beloved soap opera airs four evenings a week, exploring the daily lives of fictional characters in London’s East End. Their lives are a bit more eventful than ours, to put it mildly, but the writers manage to pack a lot of misery into those half-hour slots and we definitely get our money’s worth. Family breakdowns, crime, illness, addiction, betrayal, financial struggles, death …absolutely relentless suffering. And no one’s come to represent all of that quite like the character of Ian Beale, portrayed on and off by actor Adam Woodyatt.

Beale has been married at least five times. One of his wives hired a hitman to get rid of him. Another tried to poison him. He’s had numerous failed businesses. His daughter was murdered by his son. When it all got too much, he had a full breakdown. Ian Beale’s misery is so iconic that, if we ever abolish the monarchy, his visage will be on the shortlist to replace them on our currency.

Peep Show

Humiliation. Moral compromise. Social failure. God, we loved Peep Show, a sitcom following the antics of Mark Corrigan (David Mitchell) and Jeremy “Jez” Usbourne (Robert Webb), two men in pursuit of happiness, trying to be people they can never be, whether that’s a corporate high-flyer or just simply “cool.”

Ultimately, all their toxic friendship does is cause each of them to spiral deeper into their own misery, chasing ideal outcomes they can never achieve and sabotaging each other along the way, with every disappointment a realistic turn of events. We spent nine seasons of TV with these raging narcissists and could have probably watched nine more.

Utopia

Utopia aired only 12 episodes between 2013 and 2014, but it became a real cult gem. Bleak and violent, Dennis Kelly’s thriller series finds a bunch of comic book enthusiasts becoming preoccupied with “The Utopia Experiments,” a graphic novel that seems to have predicted terrible events in the past, and also a rumored sequel that will predict some in the future, all while a shadowy organization uses extreme violence to get their hands on it.

Keying into the country’s paranoia that we’re all being surveilled and controlled (we can’t let you guys have all the fun!) Utopia hit a nerve during an era when we weren’t quite sure how bad things would get. It also tapped into our tendency to blame those working against us in the shadows for failing to inspire meaningful change when we see a dark future ahead.

Black Mirror

Before Black Mirror went to Netflix, Charlie Brooker’s anthology show kicked off on Channel 4, where it gave us some of the most upsetting and darkly comedic British stories about where technology might be heading. “The National Anthem” saw a fictional prime minister having sex with a pig live on TV. The pre-Meta glasses “The Entire History of You” let people replay their memories with horrible consequences. “The Waldo Moment” explored our mistrust and apathy toward our own politicians.

To begin with, Black Mirror just leaned much harder into UK-specific social commentary. That would change, but for anyone who wants to understand just how easy it would be for us to ruin everything given enough of a shove, the first two seasons of Brooker’s show are a good place to start.

One Foot In the Grave

When Victor Meldrew (Richard Wilson) is forced into early retirement at the start of One Foot In the Grave, he ends up dealing with a seemingly endless string of problems and mishaps that he often makes much worse by getting incensed about them. As he copes with one misfortune or awkward coincidence after another, he inevitably also tests the patience of his long-suffering wife, Margaret (Annette Crosbie), who desperately tries to maintain a sense of calm as he grows increasingly outraged by his issues.

We won’t always admit it, but there’s a Victor Meldrew inside many of us, not just waiting to emerge, but almost daring life to provoke. Defaulting at first to a polite British demeanor, any random minor inconvenience can still set us off. The character’s catchphrase “I do not believe it!” caught on quickly when the show first hit the air in 1990, for good reason. We love to have something to moan about. It helps give our lives purpose.

Why Star Trek’s Most Iconic Piece of Technology Isn’t Getting Invented Any Time Soon

The Star Trek franchise’s fingerprints are all over basically every piece of contemporary science fiction. From an idea as large as an intergalactic government system to a design as commonplace as a spaceship that doesn’t just look like a saucer, Star Trek’s innovation is the foundation for tropes and machinery across the genre.

But the standout piece of technological advancement, the “Transporter,” has spread across works in the genre. The Transporter, a method of transportation that dematerializes its users and sends their molecules across the galaxy to another location, is easily Star Trek’s most recognizable invention. It utilizes quantum teleportation to send living beings across great distances. 

A diverse set of films, books, and TV series have made quantum teleportation a significant part of their plots. From Spaceballs to Doctor Who to even Phineas and Ferb: Across the Second Dimension, teleportation tech owes much of its creative and scientific foundations to Star Trek and the Transporter. 

However, the mechanics behind the show’s most recognizable piece of applied science don’t quite hold up under scrutiny. 

The Transporter dilemma is a topic examined by the first episode of the science-meets-pop culture podcast Does It Fly?, a collaboration between Den of Geek, the Nacelle Company, and Roddenberry Entertainment. In the episode, hosts Tamara Krinsky and Dr. Hakeem Oluseyi dive into the possibility of the Transporter becoming part of society. Unfortunately, it’s not looking good for anyone who ever wanted to travel across light and space in just a few seconds.

One of the main issues with bringing the Transporter into reality, according to Oluseyi, is surprisingly practical.

“Here is the problem: doing a Transporter is many things altogether, and the first thing is a measurement and a storage data storage problem,” Oluseyi says.

“What information do I want to store? All right, so every particle has a mass charge and spin, it has a location, it’s moving in a particular way. Another one, suppose I want to say it’s molecules, so you all have like different configurations that you’ll have to account for for that molecule. Every particle that makes you up is in a particular state,” Oluseyi explains further. “So, suppose the scanning of you takes like 10 seconds. One part of you is going to be 10 seconds older than the other part of you, and then the other thing I think about it is you can never remember actually transporting, because you need to get the data before you initiate the transportation, so whatever state you are in, that is also the state of your memory.”

The technology was invented in the 22nd century of the Star Trek universe, but Oluseyi and Krinsky believe we are much further away from quantum teleportation. Although quantum teleportation is a physics principle that has exciting potential for the future of human technology, as of right now it is not capable of putting astronauts on Mars without a rocket. 

Despite this, the Transporter and adjacent technology in film and television is still making appearances. The wonder that comes from such a revolutionary creation will certainly continue to inspire viewers just as it did in the first episodes of the Star Trek original series.

Episodes of Does It Fly? can be found on YouTube, podcast distribution platforms, and The Nacelle Company social feeds. Founded by producer and director Brian Volk-Weiss, The Nacelle Company is a pop culture imprint behind shows such as The Toys That Made Us and Down to Earth with Zac Efron on Netflix.

Resident Evil Survival Unit Teams Up with Monster Hunter

This article is presented in partnership with JOYCITY

The popular mobile game Resident Evil Survival Unit, published by Aniplex and co-developed with JOYCITY, is about to get a lot bigger thanks to a collaboration with the fan-favorite Monster Hunter property. For a limited time only, Resident Evil Survival Unit players can battle fan-favorite monsters and earn exclusive gear from the Monster Hunter franchise. We’ve got a sneak at what players can expect when this collaboration launches in Resident Evil Survival Unit on July 2 for iOS and Android devices.

Through the familiar gameplay mechanics of Resident Evil Survival Unit, players can team up and test their mettle by trying to take down some of the hulking creatures from Monster Hunter. Among the formidable bestiary making the limited time jump from the Monster Hunter universe are the Yian Kut-Ku and Rathalos, each ready to give even veteran Resident Evil Survival Unit players a daunting challenge. Rather than facing the usual hordes of the infected, players must choose and deploy their teams wisely to defeat these creatures in the defensive-oriented gameplay that Resident Evil Survival Unit is known for.

Exclusive to the collaboration are Heroes inspired by the Monster Hunter universe, who can be obtained for free during the event duration from July 2 to July 29. During this collaboration period, Resident Evil Survival Unit players can look forward to in-game events and special rewards that are must-haves for every Monster Hunter fan playing the mobile game. This includes in-game cosmetics that players can use to customize the appearance of their base and squads on the field inspired directly by Monster Hunter.

Among the events and activities included as part of the Resident Evil Survival Unit collaboration with Monster Hunter, is the limited time ability to hunt monsters through the mobile title’s usual gameplay to harvest and cook them. This echoes the prominent cooking mechanics in the Monster Hunter universe, with Resident Evil Survival Unit offering its own bonuses for hunting and cooking. After all, Rathalos can be packed with a surprising amount of nutrients to benefit any squad.

Since its launch in November 2025, Resident Evil Survival Unit has garnered millions of players worldwide to take their survival horror thrills on the go. The game takes place in locations in and around a ruined city as the region is swarmed by legions of the ravenous infected and other terrifying creatures. Players build up a base of operations and recruit survivors to help defend their base as well as embark on missions in the surrounding area, with several familiar faces from the iconic Capcom franchise joining the fray, each with their own special traits and abilities. Combat unfolds in tactical real-time strategy as squads battle enemies and gather resources and experience to upgrade their bases.

If you haven’t downloaded Resident Evil Survival Unit yet or are looking for the perfect opportunity to return to the mobile game, the Monster Hunter collaboration is a fantastic jumping-on point. The limited time collaboration takes the mobile game to epic new heights and offers plenty of in-game rewards across its entire duration. And, as with all things Resident Evil Survival Unit, while the experience is completely good to go solo, it’s even better when you team up and coordinate with friends and their bases and squads to take on overwhelming threats together.

The Monster Hunter collaboration is quickly shaping up to be the biggest event ever within the inaugural year of Resident Evil Survival Unit, with memorable enemy encounters and activities. And with plenty of rewards that are only available during this limited time event, fans should dive in and ready their bases and squads to get the most out of the collaboration. With Monster Hunter-inspired Heroes and exclusive cosmetics to earn, every Resident Evil Survival Unit fan is set to take their experience to the next level with this event.

Resident Evil Survival Unit is available now for iOS and Android devices through the App Store and Google Play. The Monster Hunter collaboration with Resident Evil Survival Unit runs from July 2 to July 29.

10 Independence Day Weekend Movie Releases That Became Classics

Independence Day weekend can be a huge opportunity for movie studios and theaters. If they’ve got a genuinely good movie lined up, butts can easily start filling seats when people have more free time during the holiday. Tentpole movies can also win big, and it stands to reason that if a studio has spent a lot of money on a project, they’ll want the best possible chance of recouping it, even if all they’re offering is just another underwhelming sequel fresh off a CGI assembly line.

Yet some Independence Day weekend releases have become genuine classics over the years, and we’re here to celebrate them. You won’t find Transformers: Dark of the Moon or Despicable Me 4 on this list, but you will find some movies much more likely to be called “absolute cinema.”

Terminator 2: Judgment Day (1991)

Back when Arnold Schwarzenegger was becoming a legitimate leading man and James Cameron was no longer thought of as the guy who made Piranha II: The Spawning, the director decided to make an action sequel to his 1984 horror hit The Terminator. It had already been established as a wise approach after he’d followed up Ridley Scott’s horror movie Alien by pumping Aliens with more action, but Carolco Pictures was still taking a massive gamble by financing it because Terminator 2: Judgment Day was the most expensive film of all time.

Cameron and co-writer William Wisher cooked up a fresh spin on the story this time around: Sarah Connor’s now-10-year-old son, John Connor, and a new T-800 from the future would become BFFs, but their ambitious vision would prove tricky to pull off. A gruelling L.A. shoot and the desire to use groundbreaking special effects added to the film’s challenges, but it was all worth it. Terminator 2 was a smash hit and is widely regarded as one of the greatest action movies. Unfortunately, the film’s success couldn’t save Carolco from its other losses; the studio filed for bankruptcy just four years later.

Back to the Future (1985)

“I guess you guys aren’t ready for that yet,” Marty McFly realizes after wailing some 1980s freestyle rock guitar in front of a dance hall full of baffled 1950s teens. “But your kids are gonna love it.” Thankfully, the kids of 1985 were absolutely ready for Marty’s antics when Back to the Future was released on July 3 that year.

It wasn’t supposed to go down that way, though. Universal wasn’t even originally planning to release Back to the Future on the 4th of July weekend, but test screenings for the Michael J. Fox-starring sci-fi flick indicated that it would likely be a banger, so the studio moved up its release date. The rest is history. Back to the Future made almost $400 million at the box office from a $19 million budget and spawned two sequels. Not bad for a movie with a plot about a boy’s mom wanting to romance him when he accidentally takes the place of his young father at a pivotal moment in their past.

Independence Day (1996)

The first movie people think of as a big Independence Day weekend release is also the first of two Will Smith projects on this list. Many have tried to copy Roland Emmerich’s entirely unsubtle actioner in the years since Independence Day came along (including the director himself), but none have come close to the high-octane nonsense of the extraterrestrial invasion that just didn’t see Randy Quaid’s drunk ass coming.

Emmerich and co-writer Dean Devlin came up with the idea for the film after seeing a ton of sci-fi movies portray alien invasions on a smaller scale, and wondered what would happen if they created a scenario in which aliens launched a massive attack and began annihilating the human race. With this in mind, $75 million to spend, and Smith as a charismatic lead, the pair struck box office gold and left Twister and Mission: Impossible in the dust that year.

The Devil Wears Prada (2006)

A fun, fashion-centric comedy was never going to beat the likes of Superman Returns during 2006’s holiday weekend, but The Devil Wears Prada fared surprisingly well against that DC spectacle and endured far beyond it, with the mid-budget comedy proving that audiences will absolutely show up for a movie about a woman trying to make it as a journalist but finding her first boss quite the workplace abuser. We’ve all had that one boss who was great at their job but treated their employees like sub-human scum. We definitely haven’t all had to thwart one of Lex Luthor’s villainous plans. As a result, The Devil Wears Prada connected with people in a way that Superman just couldn’t quite manage, at least in 2006.

Unlike other belated sequels, The Devil Wears Prada 2 managed to dodge a straight-to-streaming release, a savvy decision by 20th Century Studios that led to this year’s follow-up movie also hitting it big. Will it be considered the kind of classic that the first movie is in a couple of decades? Probably not, but we’ll always have florals for spring.

South Park: Bigger, Longer, Uncut (1999)

Paramount rolled the dice on a South Park feature film being just as good as their animated hit show in 1999, and after pestering creators Trey Parker and Matt Stone to make one, they finally relented and churned out this musical black comedy that has stood the test of time despite some dated references.

Offensive and sharply satirical, the movie’s plot is generally fine but often takes a back seat to the songs written by Parker and Marc Shaiman, a frequent collaborator of the late Rob Reiner. “I’m Super,” “Kyle’s Mom’s a Bitch,” “Uncle Fucka,” and “Blame Canada” are now all up there with the most beloved Broadway tracks. The latter failing to win an Academy Award for Best Song that year remains one of the Oscars’ greatest injustices. Parker and Stone later responded by mocking the winner, Phil Collins, in several episodes of the show, and to this day, one of the only non-music-related things that some people know about Collins is the urban legend that he divorced his wife by fax. The cultural impact of the South Park show and this movie cannot be overstated.

Spider-Man 2 (2004)

For a lot of people, Spider-Man 2 remains the best of the wallcrawler’s movies. The second entry in Sam Raimi’s trilogy pits Peter Parker against scientist Dr. Otto Octavius, a sympathetic villain under the influence of mechanical tentacles after a fusion power demonstration gone wrong, and Alfred Molina plays Otto perfectly with a weary yet menacing approach that contrasts well with the first film’s sinister Green Goblin (Willem Dafoe).

Spider-Man 2 was a hit back in 2004 and often still makes it to the top five in superhero movie rankings, usually battling Christopher Nolan’s gritter The Dark Knight for supremacy, but Raimi’s movie set the blueprint for the Marvel Cinematic Universe that would get underway later in the decade with its clever balancing act of humor and outlandish action.

Armageddon (1998)

Brushing scientific accuracy, plausibility, subtlety, and realism straight into the nearest bin, Armageddon is a Michael Bay Experience of the highest order, boasting an incredible cast of actors who put 100% of their energy into a script with eye-watering lines like “You know we’re sitting on four million pounds of fuel, one nuclear weapon and a thing that has 270,000 moving parts built by the lowest bidder. Makes you feel good, doesn’t it?” and “Requesting permission to shake the hand of the daughter of the bravest man I’ve ever met.”

Armageddon makes up for dialing ludicrousness all the way up to 11 by having so much fun it should be illegal, as a bunch of blue-collar boys head up into space to stop a massive asteroid hitting Earth. While a more realistic take on this scenario would arrive many years later with Don’t Look Up, Armageddon knew exactly what kind of high-stakes shenanigans people paid their good money to see and delivered. It’s a guilty pleasure, but a classic guilty pleasure nonetheless.

Coming to America (1988)

A huge success upon its release in 1988, Coming to America features Eddie Murphy at his best as Zamunda’s crown prince Akeem Joffer, who embarks on a quest to dodge an arranged marriage and find a strong, independent woman who isn’t interested in his wealth or royal standing. Along the way, there are jokes, yes, but also strong performances by James Earl Jones and John Amos, as well as Murphy and comedian Arsenio Hall, who play multiple characters in a way that genuinely works rather than irritates (check out some of Murphy’s other multi-role movies for comparison).

Paramount had no idea that Coming to America was going to hit big, let alone become a classic comedy. They even canceled press screenings after the movie bombed with a press screening in New York. It had been a rocky production, too, with Murphy and director John Landis on bad terms during and after production. Still, the studio was soon pulling a “Homelander relieved as crowd cheers” meme in real life after Coming to America soared.

Men in Black (1997)

It’s easy to forget that Men in Black is technically a Marvel movie. Adapted from Lowell Cunningham and Sandy Carruthers’ comic book series for Aircel (before it was acquired by Malibu and then Marvel), Will Smith and Tommy Lee Jones admittedly still rock the mismatched buddy cop splash page vibe here in a truly odd sci-fi actioner with ambition to spare.

Barry Sonnenfeld’s 98-minute “French Connection with aliens” project became Sony’s highest-grossing film until it was beaten into submission by Spider-Man years later, and it remained the best in the franchise as it generated sequel after sequel until Smith and Jones were long gone. Danny Elfman’s memorable score for the movie was also key to its longevity, though the composer claims he was actually hired in a very offhanded way after running into star Vincent D’Onofrio on the set of Peter Jackson’s The Frighteners, by which time Men in Black was close to the end of its production.

Big Trouble in Little China (1986)

Big Trouble in Little China is the only box office bomb on this list. It also drew little in the way of critical praise when it was released, but John Carpenter’s delightful movie became a surprising cult classic after it hit home video and audiences finally understood that the director’s weird mashup of martial arts, comedy, action, and fantasy was actually the anti-white savior movie of their fever dreams.

After working with Kurt Russell in The Thing and Escape from New York, Carpenter reteamed with the amiable actor for Big Trouble in Little China, where he plays truck driver Jack Burton, a distinctly tongue-in-cheek spin on John Wayne who just can’t quite get past the level of hapless sidekick despite swaggering around with the confidence of a true American hero. It was a risky take and suffered financially for it, but the film deftly subverted audience expectations and influenced plenty of hit movies that followed, including The Mummy and Thor: Ragnarok.

America 250 vs. How Hollywood Addressed the Country’s Last Landmark Birthday

Apollo Creed has a problem. In his first proper scene during the seminal 1976 sports classic, Rocky, Sylvester Stallone’s budding antagonist is introduced not as a villain or, necessarily, a fair-minded athletic rival. He’s a businessman sweating bullets because his upcoming New Year’s Day fight on the year of America’s bicentennial just imploded. The man he was supposed to fight has an injury, and there’s no time left to field a credible challenger. So he comes up with an idea; an innovation; a fine example of American entrepreneurship.

“This is the land of opportunity, right?” Apollo, a Black man living barely a decade removed from the Voting Rights Act, almost incredulously asks. “So Apollo Creed, on Jan. 1, gives a local underdog fighter an opportunity. A Snow White underdog whose face I’m going to put on this poster with me, and I’ll tell you why. Because I’m sentimental. A lot of other people in this country are just as sentimental, and there’s nothing better they’d like to see than Apollo Creed give a local Philadelphia boy a title shot on this country’s biggest birthday.”

There is a lot to unpack in this brief and flashy introduction to a character whom actor Carl Weathers turned into an unlikely icon. Not so subtly based on real-life heavyweight champ and legend Muhammad Ali, Apollo is depicted by Stallone’s screenplay as a showboat and a showman, a guy who literally comes to Philly at the beginning of America’s bicentennial riding a pony and dressed as George Washington. The movie suggests one should view Apollo’s sudden patriotic fervor a bit askance. Yet he seems to genuinely value the type of inspiration a once-broke Stallone also was betting on when he insisted any producer cast him as the lead of his script. Hence, perhaps, why Apollo even ends the aforementioned scene by dismissing a compliment about his vision being very American. “No, Jergens,” he counters, “it’s very smart.”

It’s also very much in dialogue with its cultural moment, onscreen and off. Then and now, Rocky is truly sentimental, if in a slightly sneaky, downbeat, ‘70s Hollywood fashion. So much so, it wowed audiences and critics to the point where folks were on their feet and cheering the feel-good ending—an ending where Apollo beat Rocky, for the record. But even the hero losing the fight while going the distance in a post-Vietnam, post-Watergate, and post-1970s cinema cynicism felt like a Cinderella story in ‘76, to the point where it won the Best Picture Oscar. In other words, it felt American.

And during that era of America’s previous major 50-year milestone, it was also part and parcel of a pop culture that engaged both with the ideals and myths of America, ever struggling to reconcile the sometimes yawning gap between the two.

1976 was, indeed, a year of contrasts and deliberation about what it means to be an American, and perhaps more acutely, a good American. While Rocky won Best Picture, one of the many better nominated rivals was All the President’s Men, director Alan J. Pakula and screenwriter William Goldman’s procedural celebration of the journalists who brought down President Richard Nixon not even three years prior to the film’s release. Overly romantic about the role of journalists and the fourth estate in society? Absolutely. But it was nonetheless a breathless, hushed study of a country on the edge of corruption, and as much as warning as valedictory speech that patted Woodward and Bernstein on the back for catching a crook.

In some ways, Rocky and All the President’s Men stood on opposite ends of the political spectrum, but both were engaged with a moment in America that despite having all the reason in the world to be as skeptical as Robert Redford and Dustin Hoffman’s muckrakers were onscreen, was a country more concerned with either protecting or salvaging American principles. That’s a stark difference from the current impulse to, generally, seek to be distracted from them.

The 200th anniversary, by contrast, was the year of the tall ships in New York Harbor on the Fourth of July, a literal “Freedom Train” museum scooting coast to coast on American rails, and even the British Elton John’s “Philadelphia Freedom” hitting number one on the Billboard’s Top 100 charts. It also was part and parcel at a time when American art, both pop culture and counterculture, were excited to engage in an internal debate.

Seven years prior to the bicentennial, Dennis Hopper and Peter Fonda’s Easy Rider fairly overtly, if despairingly, critiqued the idea of American freedom when a biker going by the name of Captain America (Fonda) is gunned down by good ol’ boys after cryptically musing “we blew it.” That was one vision of an America torn apart by Vietnam, assassinations, and the struggle to end a century of Jim Crow in the segregated South.

Other films took a more measured, but still relatively sharp-eyed accounting of the moment. Arriving both a few years early and in response to the bicentennial was 1776 (1972), the big screen adaptation of Sherman Edwards and Peter Stone’s Broadway musical about the drafting of the Declaration of Independence. Comparatively rose-tinted when contrasted with Lin-Manuel Miranda’s Hamilton 40-ish years later, 1776 was still revelatory for a country that had the popular image of the founding generation of Americans calcified in marble.

William Daniels’ John Adams exasperated and exhausted, even with intended affection, Howard da Silva’s Benjamin Franklin charmed but also vacillated when the question of slavery arose, and Ken Howard’s Thomas Jefferson… probably got more of a pass for his hypocrisies than the real author of the Declaration deserved. Nonetheless, all three and their rivals, from the slave-defending Southern caucus to the royalist-sympathetic members of the Pennsylvania delegation, offered a rousing and intentionally messy portrait of American independence. Which makes Adams, Franklin, and Jefferson’s jovial, high-kicking wins all the more giddy.

Yet the comparison to Miranda’s Hamilton proves apropos since, with the exception of the occasional Ken Burns documentary on PBS, it feels like pop culture has generally evaded debates of patriotism, liberty, and even America itself in the 11 years since Miranda’s musical took Broadway by storm—and then received a brief resurgence during the pandemic when a taped version of Hamilton was released on Disney+.

Otherwise most of pop culture has favored evading the American experiment rather than risk alienating a catastrophically divided audience by considering what it might mean on America’s 250th. There are technically a few independent films and TV series released by companies like Angel Studios that nominally tread these waters, but they by and large arrive with the type of hagiographic hokum that even 1776 rolled its eyes at more than 50 years ago. Meanwhile the major studios only want to confront questions of patriotism if there’s a guy holding a Captain America shield—the Marvel one, not Fonda’s.

Given the acrimony and general decline of American democracy in the last decade, I understand the sentiment of choosing to just recoil from the debate or even the holiday. But in a certain sense, that surrenders it to the folks who would stamp America’s 250th with bloodsport and racist rants on the White House lawn, and the gilded excesses of old King George on the Oval Office walls.

An inability to debate, fight for, or even acknowledge the question of America, even in our shared fantasies, is to let an experiment fall evermore into disarray.

Danny McBride Drew Inspiration for His GI Joe Movie From a Cartoon Deep Cut

You wouldn’t think it would take too much to make a good G.I. Joe movie, right? The concept’s pretty simple: you’ve got the Joes, an American military unit filled with people who each have their own gimmick fighting a terrorist organization also filled with people who each have their own unique, and also a legion of faceless soldiers and/or robots. Just make them fight! And yet, even though directors The Mummy‘s Stephen Sommers and Wicked‘s Jon M. Chu squeezed plenty of that goofiness into their films, no G.I. Joe flick has managed to connect with the public.

Paramount is hoping to right that ship by going to a famous superfan. Comedian Danny McBride has written a new G.I. Joe movie with his The Righteous Gemstones collaborators Jeff Fradley and John Carcieri, and he’s gone back to the cartoons for inspiration. “You’re following Duke and a group of other Joes,” McBride told Josh Horowitz. “There’s that town in the comics, Springfield, which is a town that’s secretly all Cobra. That is where our film takes place.”

Even longtime G.I. Joe fans who don’t read the comics will find the name Springfield compelling, and not just because it reminds them of The Simpsons. Springfield comes from the 1985 two-parter “There’s No Place Like Springfield,” written by comic book legend (and Howard the Duck creator) Steve Gerber.

The episode begins with the naval-themed Joe Shipwreck getting… uh, shipwrecked, and waking up in a sedate hospital. The nurse and doctor explain that he’s a married man, who used information given to him by a respected scientist to help the Joes defeat Cobra once and for all. With the war over, Shipwreck’s free to return to his family in the suburban town of Springfield. Despite the domestic bliss, Shipwreck cannot shake the feeling that something’s wrong, nor can he understand why his wife and neighbors keep asking him about the secret formula he gave to the Joes.

Turns out, Cobra was channeling their inner Ethan Hunt and had set up an elaborate farce in order to trick Shipwreck into spilling the secret of the formula. Of course, this being a ’80s kids cartoon, Shipwreck stays resolute and discovers the ruse in time, eventually reuniting with the Joes and defeating Cobra once again.

Despite the simplicity of the plot, “There’s No Place Like Springfield” does have potential to make for a compelling movie with widespread appeal. Similar premises occur regularly in popular culture, as in The Twilight Zone episode “The Monsters are Due on Maple Street,” the series The Prisoner, and the Star Trek: The Next Generation episode “Future Imperfect.” Furthermore, by starting with a familiar neighborhood, the movie could introduce the more outlandish elements at a measured pace.

Maybe with that starting point, McBride and his co-creators can finally make a G.I. Joe that appeals to the masses while also including wonderful weirdos like Chuckles, Dr. Mindbender, and Ice Cream Soldier.

Stepping Out of Sherlock’s Shadow: Why Enola Holmes Works as a Detective Hero 

Sherlock Holmes is a name that has dominated the mystery genre since the late 1880s, taking on many new incarnations and seeing many canon changes in the past 140 years. One notable recent change to the Sherlock universe has been the introduction of the rest of the Holmes family. American author Nancy Springer joined in on this Holmes expansion in 2006, with the creation of the book series The Enola Holmes Adventures.

Enola, the rambunctious younger sister of Sherlock and Mycroft Holmes, was raised by their mother Eudoria Holmes in a progressive household that valued independence and intelligence, a rare upbringing for women in the Victorian Era. A captivating character in her own right, Enola’s identity has long been associated with her relation to Sherlock. 

With the recent release of Netflix’s Enola Holmes 3, however, the youngest of the Holmes’ tribe has seemingly stepped out of the shadow of her older brother, showing that detectives aren’t defined by only unmatched intellect but also a sense of adaptability, empathy, and the willingness to challenge powers causing harm. 

Sherlock Holmes is arguably the most famous detective in fiction. That makes any character connected to him at risk of being sidekicked or pushed to the background in the wake of Sherlock’s analytical genius. When Netflix first introduced the live-action film version of Enola (Millie Bobby Brown) in 2020’s Enola Holmes, there was a risk of that happening to Enola and being marketed as a film about “Sherlock’s teen sister.” Enola’s identity as a Holmes was wrapped in following the footsteps of her older brother, especially with her older brother actually appearing in the film, played by literal Superman Henry Cavill.

In her first film, Enola’s journey is about establishing her place in the real world after her mother’s disappearance. She has her “brother’s wittiness,” and her similarities to Sherlock assist her sleuthing prowess. Yet, Sherlock’s stoic logical nature is not something Enola shares. Enola is emotional, her empathy being the defining trait of her character — this leads to many comparisons of her to Sherlock by characters in the series of films. It can also be added that Enola’s place as a young girl, now young woman, in society inhibits her from having Sherlock’s “non-emotional” mentality. 

Throughout the first film, Enola is introduced to the realities of being a woman in Victorian society. Having been raised in an isolated paradise centering freedom, it isn’t until she is away from her mother’s protection that she has to fight to keep that freedom for herself. Her eldest brother, Mycroft Holmes (Sam Claflin), does his best to confine her to the constraints of being a “proper lady” by sending her to Miss Harrison’s Finishing School for Young Ladies — telling a then 16-year-old Enola that her lack of desire for a husband was something that she “needs to have educated out” of her. 

This is what makes Enola so distinct from her brothers. Sherlock can operate autonomously, engaging with society as he pleases as an almost neutral body, desiring nothing but a game of intellect. Mycroft engages in society with the goal of gaining privilege and prestige, wanting to gain a place of notability. Enola’s options are not as freely given — being a female detective, and in turn a troublemaker, her identity intersects with the systems of classism and sexism that make her susceptible to unjust and harsh treatment. The role of Victorian women was to keep house; girls didn’t need education as their duty was to learn to be wives and mothers. 

This is the antithesis of Enola’s character, yet she uses it as both an advantage and a disguise. She also uses sexism as a cloak. As a woman, she is often underestimated and looked down upon — which allows her to get ahead of many of her male adversaries. This also allows her to navigate in places that Sherlock cannot. Often relying on women and female spaces, Enola has a network of underground radical feminist women that have helped her along her journey. This was a focal point in Enola Holmes 2, as her mother (Helena Bonham Carter) and mentor, cafe and secret women’s dojo owner Edith (Susan Wokoma), introduce her to that network who have each other’s backs. 

The second film showcases not only Enola’s grit and determination to get out of Sherlock’s shadow, but her willingness to help people simply because they need help. In the third film, Enola even marks the difference between her brother and her as Sherlock helping “those with means” while she helps “those with needs.” Enola prioritizes understanding people — her comprehension of social dynamics, emotional patterns, and personal motivations being the way in which she solves her cases. 

She helped the Matchstick girls, which tied into the real-life Matchgirls’ strike of 1888, when no one else would define her place in detective work. These girls were being poisoned by the chemicals used to make the matches, resulting in the deaths of hundreds of young girls working in these factories. She helps those whose lives are seen as disposable. She understands what it means to have no one defend you, to fight for your own freedom, and to keep going when you think no one believes in you. She knows what it feels like to be alone, yet understands the moral responsibility of persevering when you are the only person in the room who represents more than your own desires. 

Sherlock is a vastly different character. He is anti-social, profoundly introverted, and unapologetically himself. That personality has understandably captivated readers for over a hundred years now. However, Enola’s opposingly earnest yet complimentary nature has been a breath of fresh air. 

While Sherlock is chasing the thrill of solving complex mysteries, Enola is fighting against systems of inequality; sexism, classism, elitism, and racism are all cultivated into her greatest antagonists. In Enola Holmes 3, Enola is battling against herself, her desire to marry Tewksberry (Louis Partridge), whom she loves, and her hesitance to enter the confines of being a lady, having now officially “joined the pantheon of great Victorian detectives.” Simultaneously, Enola is faced with the prospect of saving a kidnapped Sherlock, who is the distraction for a mystery surrounding the people of Malta and the incredible suffering and wrongdoing they have faced at the hands of the British crown. Enola takes on this challenge, not only to save her brother, but to find out the truth that the people of Malta deserve as they remain under the oppression of the British monarchy. 

Enola isn’t perfect in her methods, but she works harder than anyone else to get the desired result. Enola feels scrappy in nature. She takes risks. She makes emotional decisions, while fighting first and asking questions later. She is occasionally kidnapped, relies on the allies and connections she makes along the way, and she isn’t the loner superhuman deductionist that her brother is. Yet every win feels earned — watching Enola evolve and grow throughout the films, learning lessons and seldom making the same mistake twice. Enola works hard and embraces her circumstances while doing everything in her power to change them. 

Enola’s nature and navigation of life is so strikingly different from her brother’s, but it just works. 

She represents the amazing storytelling that comes with changing the angle inside of a popular story. Focusing on the “underexplored” (using that term extremely loosely) or creating new characters to examine perspectives that weren’t previously considered can birth amazing films and inspirational characters. 

Enola Holmes 3 is now streaming on Netflix. 

15 Movies That Don’t Answer Their Own Questions

Movies don’t necessarily need to answer every single question they pose, since what we can imagine can often fill the gaps. These mysteries stay with us far longer than any definitive answer can, letting fans discuss the film for decades rather than just having an opinion on the solution.

We do admit that, sometimes, that can be frustrating. Some mystery is fine, but when you don’t have anything to hold on to form a theory, you’re just shooting in the dark. These following movies present questions without clear answers, although if they do it well or not, that’s up to you.

IMDb

The Thing

John Carpenter’s sci-fi horror classic ends without revealing whether MacReady, Childs, both, or neither are actually the alien imitation. The film deliberately leaves the fate of its final survivors unresolved, fueling decades of fan debate.

IMDb

Inception

Christopher Nolan famously ends Inception with Cobb’s spinning top wobbling but never definitively falling. The audience is left to decide whether Cobb has truly returned to reality or remains inside a dream.

IMDb

Pulp Fiction

The glowing contents of Marsellus Wallace’s briefcase are never revealed. Quentin Tarantino intentionally leaves the mystery unsolved, allowing the briefcase to function as one of cinema’s most iconic unanswered questions.

IMDb

Lost in Translation

As Bob whispers something to Charlotte during their final goodbye, the audience never hears his exact words. Sofia Coppola intentionally keeps the moment private, preserving the intimacy and ambiguity of their relationship.

IMDb

2001: A Space Odyssey

Stanley Kubrick’s masterpiece presents the Monolith, the Star Gate sequence, and the Star Child without straightforward explanations. Rather than spelling out their meaning, the film encourages viewers to interpret its cosmic symbolism themselves.

IMDb

No Country for Old Men

Anton Chigurh disappears after surviving a violent car accident, and Llewelyn Moss dies off-screen before Sheriff Bell arrives. The Coen brothers intentionally deny audiences the conventional confrontations many expect from a thriller.

IMDb

The Lobster

The film ends just before David makes a life-altering decision in a restaurant bathroom. Director Yorgos Lanthimos never reveals what choice he ultimately makes, leaving the conclusion entirely open to interpretation.

IMDb

Enemy

Denis Villeneuve’s psychological thriller concludes with a giant spider appearing in Adam’s apartment. The startling image is never literally explained, remaining one of modern cinema’s most discussed and symbolic endings.

IMDb

Picnic at Hanging Rock

Three schoolgirls and a teacher vanish during a Valentine’s Day outing in 1900. The film never reveals what happened to them, preserving the central mystery that has fascinated audiences for decades.

IMDb

Donnie Darko

While the film offers clues about time travel and alternate realities, many aspects of Donnie’s visions, Frank’s identity, and the mechanics of the Tangent Universe remain intentionally open to interpretation.

IMDb

The Shining

The final photograph showing Jack Torrance at the Overlook Hotel’s 1921 ball remains unexplained. Stanley Kubrick never provides a definitive answer for how or why Jack appears in the decades-old image.

IMDb

Mulholland Drive

David Lynch’s surreal mystery resists a single definitive interpretation. The relationships between Betty, Diane, Rita, and the film’s dreamlike structure remain intentionally ambiguous, encouraging endless analysis rather than concrete answers.

IMDb

Under the Skin

Scarlett Johansson’s mysterious alien is never fully explained. The film reveals little about her species, mission, or origins, choosing atmosphere and implication over direct exposition throughout the unsettling story.

IMDb

The Blair Witch Project

Despite the title, the audience never actually sees the Blair Witch. The film relies entirely on suggestion, found footage, and the characters’ growing fear, leaving the nature of the supernatural threat unresolved.

Cache

Michael Haneke’s thriller never definitively identifies who is sending the anonymous surveillance tapes. The unresolved mystery reinforces the film’s themes of guilt, memory, and accountability instead of offering a satisfying culprit.

Minions & Monsters Easter Eggs and Hollywood History Explained by the Director

This article contains some Minions & Monsters spoilers

Minions & Monsters is the third Illumination film to bear the title of the devious, banana-shaped critters who were first dreamed up by filmmaker Pierre Coffin and collaborators Chris Renaud and Eric Guillon. It is also the seventh film to showcase these animated hybrids between Oompa-Loompas and the Keystone Cops. Yet while devising a new film about the little guys, writer-director Coffin wasn’t so much thinking about their future as he was their past. Plus his own. It’s a fact that becomes obvious before the finished film even starts.

When families and fans enter the cinema for Minions & Monsters this holiday weekend, the first proper thing they’ll see is Eadweard Muybridge’s 1878 motion picture of a horse running (albeit Minions style). But right before that lovely sight is a literal walk back in time via every Universal Pictures title card since the studio’s 1912 founding.

“I had the idea from the start,” Coffin confides to us with a wry smile over Zoom. “I even went on YouTube and got all the Universal logos.” With the exception of the earliest version from the salad days of studio founder Carl Laemmle, they were all online and easy to mash up and reverse. “I didn’t know if it was going to work, so I stole those off of YouTube, edited them, put it backwards, edited that little effect, and it’s in the movie.” It serves as a cute easter egg but also a statement of intent.

For Coffin, the whole appeal of Minions & Monsters has been this walk down memory lane, both as a cinephile who loves the building blocks of the moving image, as well as someone who was once a kid growing up on Universal’s catalog of monsters from nearly a century ago. Minions & Monsters represented a chance to explore the past, even while creating something new for the next generation.

“The goal of the movie is that it’s a Minions movie but it feels different,” Coffin admits. “[It needs to be] funny… but I didn’t want it to be more of the same. So the era, and everything that we put in there, was stuff that felt relevant and also that motivated me into wanting to do it.” Below are a handful of those biggest motivators and inspirations, for Minions, Monsters, and more…

Hollywood History, Gods and (Universal) Monsters

The new Illumination film’s framing device is designed to get moviegoers of every generation feeling nostalgic. Inside an apparent Hollywood History museum, a snappy tour guide voiced by Allison Janney walks families and school children by familiar—and often Universal copyrighted—sights. The hoverboard from Back to the Future Part II (1989); E.T. and the fateful bicycle from the Steven Spielberg movie of 1982; there’s even a deeper cut of Alfred Hitchcock’s The Birds (1963). Oh, also, no less than George Lucas himself.

But in the corner that sets the plot in motion is an area dedicated solely to the memory of Henry and James, the Minions from a different tribe who broke into Hollywood in a big way during the 1920s and ‘30s. And as a testament to their legacy are three specific movie posters: one for the Fritz Lang German silent film classic Metropolis (1927), and two that directly riff on iconic Universal Monsters The Mummy (1932) and Creature from the Black Lagoon (1954), albeit with a certain Minions styling. The latter two specifically represented monumental moments in Coffin’s childhood introduction to American culture. 

“I didn’t know those movies existed before moving to the States in ’77,” Coffin reveals. “I moved to the States for three years, and there were so many horror movies that I didn’t know existed. So when I discovered them on TV—[movies like] The Fly and Frankenstein—at the time I was just in awe of these movies. They weren’t aired on French TV at the time, so I was just like, ‘Whoa, how come I can’t see them in my local theater?’ I had to chase them on those TV channels they were on at the time.”

Indeed, while The Mummy appears to be a personal favorite with a version of the Boris Karloff undead sorcerer showing up before quickly unraveling later in Minions & Monsters, one non-Universal beastie that had special significance on the film and young Coffin is Paramount’s original The Blob from 1958.

“I remember going to the movies in France to see The Blob… in the ‘70s,” says Coffin, “and I was terrified by it, really terrified. And just because of  that I had the idea [on Minions & Monsters] for Irene.” The writer-director is referring to the ultimate monster that a Cthulu-like creature summons in the third act of the film (and which is on all the posters).

Says Coffin, “I was like, ‘Let’s make Irene this blobby thing with eyes.’ I then said we should all go look at that movie again.” The filmmaker pauses and a grin spreads across his face. “And horrible, just horrible. The Blob doesn’t even move in that movie! It’s just like standing there with everybody yelling and that was it! So the perception of it as a kid and knowing what it is as an adult, it’s a different thing.”

Charlie Chaplin, Harold Lloyd, Buster Keaton, and the Building Blocks of Comedy

Yet while the monsters of the title are one of the selling points of the movie, the real centerpiece of its muses comes during the grandest animated set piece. It’s the scene where the Minions Henry, Ed, and James quite literally break into Hollywood by way of a runaway locomotive that explodes into the film like a prop from The Great Train Robbery (1903). Meanwhile in hot pursuit is no less than the Keystone Cops, the titular slapstick law enforcement buffoons who appeared in a series of comedies produced by the Keystone Film Company between 1912 and 1917.

According to Coffin, all of the mayhem that ensued, including the Minions meeting their veritable ancestors in comedy stars like Charlie Chaplin, Buster Keaton, and Harold Lloyd, originally sprang from Coffin and his team trying to imagine a humorous way to introduce the Minions crossing over from ancient history to the relatively recent backstory of cinema.

“I go by visual cues,” Coffin admits. So when he and his team drew up what it would look like if there were so many Minions climbing atop a stagecoach in the Old West, Coffin knew they were on the right track by how humorously jarring it was when they started forming into giant balls of yellow. After that, it became about escalation.

“I knew that I needed to create a little bit of surprise,” Coffin explains, “so we added the train, and then we referenced The Great Train Robbery. And then the whole moment was for me to say, ‘How do I get from the audience thinking we’re in the Western era to the moment where we’re discovering that, no, that’s totally wrong, we’re in 1920s Hollywood. So we [decided] we need to trickle out the clues. And so from the train, we go to the Keystone Cops, which is ‘whoa, what are the cops doing here?’”

Eventually, though, it became specifically about recreating—and perhaps affectionately desecrating with Minions mayhem—three iconic moments in physical comedy: Harold Lloyd hanging from a clocktower in the vertigo-inducing silent rom-com classic, Safety Last! (1923), Buster Keaton surviving a literal house falling down around him in a shot that would make insurance men sweat bullets during Steamboat Bill Jr. (1928), and most especially the bit where Charlie Chaplin gets gummed up in the bowels of industrial America during Modern Times (1936).

“When I was thinking about a factory [setting], I said, ‘Maybe we should do that Modern Times quick reference and have our take at it?’” Coffin recalls. “And the conceit of those three little moments—Chaplin in Modern Times, Harold Lloyd in Safety Last!, and Buster Keaton in [Steamboat Bill Jr.]… is just not to give a reference. It was just to say maybe what we know of history is wrong? Maybe it’s the Minions that actually provoked those accidents?!”

Kidding aside, for Coffin it was about paying homage to his forebears.

“I think the Minions come down from every one of those geniuses that did slapstick at the time,” says Coffin. “Like before doing this movie, we were already referencing those guys just because in animation we go for slapstick, which is a form of physical comedy. So cartoons, in terms of an animated genre, is only referencing those guys who have invented slapstick: non-talking characters, physical violence, you name it. It’s Tom and Jerry, it’s all the Tex Avery movies.”

Babylon, Singin’ in the Rain, and All That Jazz

While Minions & Monsters isn’t (quite) another parable about the cataclysmic culture shock of sound being introduced to silent pictures in the 1920s, the movie nonetheless moves and bustles through quite a bit of Hollywood history, showing the Minions rising to the top of silent comedy cinema in the Jazz Age and getting completely decked out how we might expect.

Indeed, there’s a scene where James and Henry win an Oscar and a line of sequined flappers in pink dresses come bounding on the stage behind them. Coffin freely admits they’re modeled after Debbie Reynolds’ iconic cake-girl outfit and routine in the definitive Hollywood musical-comedy about Hollywood itself, Singin’ in the Rain (1952).

“Yeah, totally,” Coffin laughs. “She has the same hairstyle and stuff.” But then he admits he is playing in the same sandbox as every film, recent and old, that has revisited this monumental moment in Hollywood history. “I mean it’s the same subject matter, right?” Coffin considers. “Babylon, Singin’ in the Rain, and The Artist, they all speak about that era and the arrival of sound, obviously.” By his own admission, the party sequences in Minions & Monsters were more specifically modeled after the epic shindigs written down by F. Scott Fitzgerald in the seminal 1925 novel The Great Gatsby. Yet even by almost accident, he found himself echoing the immense bacchanal of Damien Chazelle’s Babylon, which imagined Hollywood debauchery culminating in an elephant running through Los Angeles house parties.

“The Babylon thing came after the fact, but my initial thing was Blake Edwards more than Babylon,” says Coffin. “It was just a general collectivist thing where let’s have crazy animals in there to show these guys are so rich they can get anything they want.” The filmmaker is specifically referring to the Blake Edwards and Peter Sellers comedy The Party (1968), wherein ‘60s go-go swingers and flower children throw down at a party that also includes an Asian elephant running wild. Still, when the connection to Babylon became apparent, Coffin and his team happily brought it into the merrymaking.

Casablanca, Citizen Kane, and the Brothers Warner

Of course no exploration of the Golden Age of Hollywood, especially when sound is introduced, can occur without a nod to two poles that frequently wind up at the top of all rankings of the greatest American movies: Michael Curtiz and Warner Brothers’ gold standard example of the Hollywood system of yore being able to produce masterpieces, Casablanca (1942), and the iconoclastic film that broke that mold and bucked industry trends and cinema vernacular, Orson Wells’ Citizen Kane (1941).

One of the latter’s several easter egg nods in the film has been partially released online, in which one of the Minion performers continuously flubs a pivotal moment for his director (Christoph Waltz) by being unable to say the fateful word “rosebud” on his deathbed. Once you see the finished film though… it ain’t “rosebud” that comes out of James’ mouth!

Citizen Kane is obviously the ultimate thing,” Coffin admits, and it was one of the movies from the earliest concept art and meetings that was always going to be referenced in a montage of the Minions struggling with sound.

“That survived the test of time, but we tweaked it slightly, because we used to end it on just one word, a nonsense word. It used to be ‘bikini,’ which I think now is second. But in the end, it’s just, ‘Oh poop!’ And then ‘bikini.’ Then all of them.” It’s the culmination of a gag that was always supposed to show, like for the characters of Singin’ in the Rain, that the talking pictures were hard, man.

“We tried, I think, a dozen ideas,” Coffin explains. “I know that I wanted a moment where the Minions would screw up with sound. I didn’t know how yet. I didn’t know if it was going to be because they’re saying the English words wrong or if they just can’t speak. I didn’t know. So we did a lot of stuff.” At one point, the Minions were going to mess up on the set of a Western, at another they were going to fumble on the set of James Whale’s Frankenstein (1931), and also a Ten Commandments-esque biblical epic. What survived this process though was Citizen Kane being the ultimate punchline, a nondescript World War I epic that Coffin claims he picked just because he liked the aesthetics—albeit I see quite a bit of The Big Parade (1925) in it—and of course Casablanca, with maybe a little bit of The Maltese Falcon (1941) sprinkled in.

Both of those last two star Humphrey Bogart, which is the name that James’ miscast Minion goes by while chatting up a dame in an office that looks suspiciously like a film noir private eye’s humble abode.

Says Coffin, “Casablanca was really the thing that felt like it started slowly. Like ‘Okay, it established the principal and cue cards, and all that stuff.’ We needed something that slowly grew.”

Yet it wouldn’t be the only Casablanca nod in the film which also seems to be taking special aim at Jack Warner and Harry Warner, two of the Warner brothers who gave WB its name. Theirs was the studio that produced Casablanca with its iconic use of the song “As Time Goes By.” In Minions & Monsters, we meet the Bright Brothers of slightly diverging sensibilities on a studio lot that looks like a cross between WB and the iconic Paramount Pictures gate. Coffin freely admits he modeled both Bright Brothers on Jack and company.

“If I was a cartoonist at the time, that’s how I would draw them,” Coffin says of the Warners. “That image of the director stuck between those two big guys is actually a drawing for me where, when I started doing the beat boards and for this movie, that was one of the images I wanted to see in the movie. So it’s there. If I could have done like cigars and stuff, I would have done it, but I was not allowed.”

With that said, he wanted to at least nod to the legacy of what they could create as well.

“I wanted to have the cliché of those mean, scary guys, and then ultimately, we made them slightly different. One really ruthless, like mean, and the other one is just as ruthless but in a nice way. And adding that little Casablanca moment made them very human, which was very important to me. I didn’t want them to be all the way through caricature. I still wanted them to have this soul, this sensitivity, and them asking that Sam, the piano player, to play that music felt like a good way to humanize those guys.”

The Power of Movies

There is a line of thinking that might question why any of these sometimes hundred-year-old films are being homaged and revered in a Minions movie. The target audience will undoubtedly be children who likely never have heard of Citizen Kane, much less the infamous revelation that “rosebud” is the name of Charles Foster Kane’s sled.

“I get asked that question,” Coffin concedes. “‘But kids don’t know Citizen Kane’ and dah dah dah. I don’t think you need to know. You just need to know that it’s a guy, or Minion, that looks like he’s dying and his last words are, ‘Oh poop.’”

That’s the gag, but truthfully, Coffin hopes Minions & Monsters will be the start of some kids discovering more.

“So whether it’s Citizen Kane or all these moments of ‘who are those guys? Why is everybody laughing, hopefully, at the Modern Times moment, at the Harold Lloyd moment?,’” Coffins begins, “I don’t think kids know that, or maybe they do. But then it’s sort of a TikTok thing where it’s ‘poof,’ and ‘Harold Lloyd was a genius,’ and then moving on. So I’m hoping that if they don’t know, they’ll ask and then they’ll find an answer, and then they’ll realize that, yeah, Buster Keaton, when you see his stunts, they’re incredible. And then you fall on a video where you see a collection of all his stunts, and then all of a sudden you’re interested in his film career, and then you plunge into it, and you find The General, The Cameraman, and then you find all these movies that are still working to this day.”

By the Minions maestro’s accounting, these are the kind of classics that will always hold up.

“When you look at them, they’re just brilliant,” he says. “And when I showed it to my kids, they were reacting to the black and white, and saying, ‘Oh, what is this?’ But then 10 seconds in, they were totally forgetting that it was in black and white, and they were struck by the storytelling, which is still working these days, particularly Chaplin, by the way.”

It can be a new world of old gods and monsters.

Minions & Monsters is in theaters now.

15 Movie Heroes Who Only Made Their Own Lives Harder

A hero or protagonist of a film is often the one that solves the problems being thrown at them by the plot, and seeing how they can triumph at the end tends to be the point of the story. Some tales, however, involve heroes that, through their very own actions, made their lives so much harder than needed.

The way they act is oftentimes why their tales are so successful, but it doesn’t stop us from feeling frustrated at how their lives could’ve been much easier. An easy life doesn’t make for good content, but we like these characters enough to wish they had a break.

IMDb

Scott Pilgrim (Scott Pilgrim vs. the World)

Scott’s reluctance to be honest about his relationships creates unnecessary conflict with nearly everyone around him. His romantic indecision complicates situations that would have been far simpler with straightforward communication.

IMDb

Peter Parker (Spider-Man)

Peter’s desire to handle every crisis alone frequently backfires. Whether hiding the truth from loved ones or refusing assistance from fellow heroes, his secrecy often creates bigger personal problems than the villains themselves.

IMDb

Marty McFly (Back to the Future)

Much of Marty’s trouble stems from his inability to ignore insults. His habit of reacting whenever someone calls him “chicken” repeatedly pushes him into dangerous situations that could have been avoided entirely.

IMDb

Woody (Toy Story)

Woody’s jealousy of Buzz Lightyear leads him to make impulsive decisions that leave both toys stranded. His rivalry creates the very crisis he spends the rest of the movie desperately trying to fix.

IMDb

Bruce Nolan (Bruce Almighty)

After receiving divine powers, Bruce initially uses them for personal gain instead of helping others. His selfish choices create chaos in his career, relationships, and community before he finally understands the responsibility he’s been given.

IMDb

Chris Gardner (The Pursuit of Happyness)

Chris’s determination is inspiring, but his decision to invest heavily in expensive bone-density scanners before securing reliable buyers leaves his family in severe financial hardship that becomes increasingly difficult to escape.

IMDb

Carl Fredricksen (Up)

Carl isolates himself after losing Ellie, pushing away people who genuinely want to help. His refusal to let go of the past complicates his journey until Russell gradually helps him reconnect with the world.

Lightning McQueen (Cars)

McQueen’s arrogance causes him to prioritize winning over everyone else. His impatience leads him off course, stranded in Radiator Springs, where he ultimately learns lessons that could have come much less painfully.

IMDb

Andy Sachs (The Devil Wears Prada)

Andy accepts the demands of a prestigious fashion job but gradually sacrifices her relationships and personal values. Many of the difficulties she faces come from choices she continues making long after recognizing the consequences.

IMDb

Dr. Richard Kimble (The Fugitive)

Kimble repeatedly risks capture by conducting his own investigation while evading authorities. Although he eventually uncovers the conspiracy, cooperating with trustworthy allies sooner might have shortened his ordeal considerably.

IMDb

Jack Dawson (Titanic)

Jack repeatedly puts himself in greater danger after the ship strikes the iceberg, first by returning to rescue Rose and later by risking precious time helping others. His selflessness is admirable but undeniably costly.

IMDb

Buster Moon (Sing)

Buster’s optimism borders on recklessness. By promising prize money he doesn’t actually have, he creates financial and personal problems that threaten both his theater and the dreams of everyone participating in his competition.

IMDb

Po (Kung Fu Panda)

Po initially refuses to take his training seriously, frustrating Master Shifu and slowing his own progress. Much of his early struggle comes from doubting himself instead of embracing the potential others already see.

IMDb

Luke Skywalker (The Empire Strikes Back)

Ignoring Yoda’s warnings, Luke cuts his training short to confront Darth Vader before he’s ready. His impatience leads directly to a devastating defeat and one of the most painful revelations in cinematic history.

IMDb

Daniel LaRusso (The Karate Kid)

Daniel often escalates conflicts with Johnny and the Cobra Kai students instead of walking away. While he’s hardly the sole cause of their rivalry, several confrontations become much worse because of his impulsive reactions.

15 Sitcom Characters Who Would Be Awful Neighbors

Sitcom characters aren’t meant to be realistic, they are a constant source of conflicts that make us laugh through their antics. They don’t solve problems the obvious way, have communication problems and are, in a general sense, not great to be around.

But what if you don’t live with them, but next door to them? Well, with such vocal personalities, what makes audiences laugh would make neighbors want to kick them out of the hood. These are just a few sitcom characters whose neighbors would likely spend more time complaining than borrowing a cup of sugar.

IMDb

Cosmo Kramer (Seinfeld)

Kramer treats every apartment in the building like it’s his own, barging in uninvited, launching bizarre business schemes, and accidentally creating chaos. Living next door would mean constant noise, surprise visits, and unpredictable emergencies.

IMDb

Charlie Harper (Two and a Half Men)

Charlie’s beachfront home hosts loud parties, overnight guests, and frequent arguments. Between the constant drinking and late-night activity, anyone living nearby would probably lose plenty of sleep and patience.

IMDb

Michael Scott (The Office)

Michael desperately wants everyone to like him, but his lack of boundaries would make him exhausting as a neighbor. Expect awkward conversations, ill-advised neighborhood events, and constant interruptions at the worst possible moments.

IMDb

Barney Stinson (How I Met Your Mother)

Barney’s apartment is the setting for elaborate parties and an endless parade of romantic conquests. The constant stream of visitors and late-night celebrations would make him difficult for any neighboring tenant to tolerate.

IMDb

Sheldon Cooper (The Big Bang Theory)

Sheldon values rules above almost everything else. He’d likely complain about minor noise, parking, trash placement, or thermostat settings while expecting everyone nearby to follow his incredibly specific standards.

IMDb

Lucy Ricardo (I Love Lucy)

Lucy’s endless attempts to break into show business usually end in spectacular disasters. Whether she’s causing commotion in the building or dragging others into another scheme, peace and quiet would be hard to find nearby.

IMDb

Frank Gallagher (Shameless)

Frank’s reckless lifestyle brings police officers, arguments, and questionable visitors to his doorstep on a regular basis. Even by sitcom standards, he’d be one of the most unpredictable and troublesome neighbors imaginable.

IMDb

Karen Walker (Will & Grace)

Karen’s loud personality, extravagant parties, and complete disregard for social etiquette would quickly wear on anyone living nearby. Her wealth might solve some problems, but it certainly wouldn’t make her quieter.

IMDb

Joey Tribbiani (Friends)

Joey is friendly enough, but his apartment often becomes the site of loud gatherings, constant visitors, and late-night celebrations. Add his tendency to forget responsibilities, and he’d make for a frustrating neighbor.

IMDb

Ron Swanson (Parks and Recreation)

Ron generally keeps to himself, but his extreme desire for privacy would make neighborly interaction nearly impossible. Borrowing a tool or making small talk would likely be met with visible annoyance.

IMDb

Kelso (That ’70s Show)

Kelso’s lack of common sense means almost every situation becomes an accident waiting to happen. Whether damaging property or causing neighborhood mishaps, he’d unintentionally create endless headaches for those living nearby.

IMDb

Bender (Futurama)

Bender drinks constantly, throws wild parties, steals almost anything not nailed down, and has little regard for other people’s property. Even in the 31st century, he’d be the resident everyone complains about.

IMDb

Kimmy Gibbler (Full House)

Kimmy’s over-the-top personality, constant unannounced visits, and loud enthusiasm regularly test the Tanner family’s patience. Living next door would mean little privacy and an endless supply of unexpected interruptions.

IMDb

Dennis Reynolds (It’s Always Sunny in Philadelphia)

Dennis presents himself as charming, but his manipulative behavior and inflated ego make him deeply unsettling. Most neighbors would probably avoid eye contact entirely after only a few uncomfortable interactions.

IMDb

Arthur Spooner (The King of Queens)

Arthur is loud, argumentative, and constantly inserting himself into other people’s lives. His unpredictable behavior and habit of creating unnecessary drama would make sharing a property line an exhausting experience.

The 15 Most Pointless Movie MacGuffins

A ‘MacGuffin’ is a storytelling device that keeps characters moving, even if the object itself barely matters in the end. Alfred Hitchcock popularized the term to describe the mysterious briefcases, artifacts, and secret documents that motivate entire plots without being the real point of the story.

It is understandable that they aren’t a focus, rather an excuse, but as audiences we do feel they need to be able to do something. If the movie is going to revolve around a single item, we should at least understand its purpose. These are some of the most memorable movie MacGuffins that, in hindsight, were surprisingly pointless.

IMDb

The Briefcase (Pulp Fiction)

Everyone wants the glowing briefcase, yet the audience never learns exactly what’s inside. Quentin Tarantino deliberately leaves its contents a mystery, making the case one of cinema’s most famous examples of a true MacGuffin.

IMDb

The Rabbit’s Foot (Mission: Impossible III)

The Rabbit’s Foot is treated as a world-changing bioweapon throughout the film, but its exact nature is never explained. What matters isn’t the device itself, but Ethan Hunt’s mission to recover it before the villains do.

IMDb

The Heart of the Ocean (Titanic)

The enormous blue diamond motivates treasure hunters decades after the Titanic sinks. In the end, Rose quietly throws the priceless jewel back into the ocean, rendering the entire search effectively meaningless.

IMDb

The Falcon (The Maltese Falcon)

Detectives, criminals, and collectors betray and kill one another over the legendary jeweled statue. After all the bloodshed, it turns out to be an expertly crafted fake, making everyone’s obsession completely futile.

IMDb

The Rosebud Sled (Citizen Kane)

The mystery of Charles Foster Kane’s final word drives the entire investigation, yet no character ever learns that “Rosebud” refers to his childhood sled. The revelation changes nothing for the people searching for answers.

IMDb

The Silver Briefcase (Ronin)

Nearly every major player in Ronin double-crosses someone else to obtain a mysterious metal briefcase. Its contents are never revealed, emphasizing that the object itself is irrelevant compared to the intrigue surrounding it.

IMDb

The Government Files (Kiss Kiss Bang Bang)

Several characters risk their lives pursuing a set of supposedly valuable government files. The specifics of what’s inside are largely beside the point, as the mystery serves mainly to fuel the film’s twists and betrayals.

IMDb

The Grail Diary (Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade)

Everyone races to obtain Henry Jones Sr.’s diary because it contains clues to the Holy Grail. Once the Grail is found, however, the diary’s practical importance quickly disappears.

IMDb

The Tesseract (The Avengers)

The Tesseract changes hands repeatedly across multiple Marvel films as factions seek its incredible power. Ultimately, it serves mostly as a container for the Space Stone, making the cube itself expendable.

IMDb

The Red Ryder BB Gun (A Christmas Story)

Ralphie’s dream of owning a Red Ryder BB gun drives the entire story. Once Christmas finally arrives, the coveted gift functions mainly as the punchline to the film’s long-running anticipation.

IMDb

The Declaration of Independence (National Treasure)

Nicolas Cage’s character steals the Declaration not because he wants the document itself, but because it supposedly hides a clue. The priceless historical artifact is ultimately just another step toward the real treasure.

IMDb

The Formula (The Formula)

The entire thriller revolves around a secret synthetic fuel formula that multiple factions are willing to kill for. By the end, the formula’s actual contents and potential impact matter far less than the conspiracy built around it.

IMDb

The Ruby (Romancing the Stone)

Joan Wilder’s adventure revolves around delivering a priceless ruby while avoiding criminals. By the conclusion, the relationships formed and experiences gained prove far more important than the gemstone everyone was chasing.

IMDb

The One Ring (The Lord of the Rings)

The One Ring possesses immense power, yet no hero can safely use it. The Fellowship spends three films protecting an artifact whose ultimate purpose is simply to be destroyed rather than wielded. Granted, it is of great use to Sauron, but pointless to the heroes.

IMDb

The Orb (Guardians of the Galaxy)

Most of the film centers on competing factions trying to obtain a mysterious Orb. It is eventually revealed to be little more than a protective casing for the Power Stone, making the container itself largely irrelevant.