Den of Geek

So what’s happened with the Superman Returns sequel?

Simon Brew


The chances of Bryan Singer directing, certainly, seem all but gone

Why hasn’t Superman returned again? We look at the future for a sixth big screen Man Of Steel adventure…

Published on Jul 6, 2009

The plan, following the Batman template, was fairly straightforward. Bring in an established director whose films have mixed commercial and critical acclaim. Give them the reigns to one of your potentially most lucrative superhero franchises. Sit back and watch the cash come in, and start planning the sequel fairly quickly.

It worked with Christopher Nolan and Batman Begins, which paved the way, of course, to last summer's The Dark Knight. And when Warner Bros unleashed 2006's Superman Returns into the world, under the stewardship of Bryan Singer - who by this time had two successful X-Men movies under his belt - the thinking was surely that 2009 would see some form of Superman 2.

Only, as you've probably worked out, it hasn't happened yet. That's in spite of Warner Bros' summer 2009 slate being so bare at one point that it needed to delay a Harry Potter movie by eight months to bulk it up.

So where exactly is the next Superman film? Nowhere in sight, appears to be the answer. For a while, it seemed that Bryan Singer would be re-attached, and while nobody has come out and said that he won't be doing another Superman movie, Warner Bros has clearly hardly been beating a path to his door to do it. The reason? The underwhelming word of mouth that the last film garnered. It actually did similar numbers to Batman Begins too at the US box office, and yet many were left wondering several things. Where's the action? Why are you being quite so reverential to the earlier films? What's this silly plot all about?

Personally, I quite liked it (and to be fair to Singer, when he stages an action sequence, such as the landing of the aircraft, it's something to behold), but Superman Returns nonetheless failed to ignite fresh passion in the franchise. But still, the initial thought was that enough money was in the bank to press ahead with another film.

And then Warner Bros wobbled. It had originally announced that the film would indeed be arriving in the midst of 2009's summer blockbuster season, and that Bryan Singer was pencilled in to return to the director's chair. The initial thought was that Brainiac and Bizarro were possible villains for the story, and that the action quotient would be ramped right up too. In fact, all of the key cast were also primed to return, too.

Thus, the story work began, and yet it seemed to be taking longer than originally planned. Then, Singer decided to go off and film the Tom Cruise-headliner Valkyrie, and the word was that filming would start in the middle of 2008. At the end of 2007, though, writers Dan Harris and Michael Dougherty left the project, and the writers' strike in America made it problematic to quickly bring in fresh faces. Warner Bros decided to delay the project to 2010, as a result.

But then talk surfaced that Warner Bros was looking, effectively, to reboot the reboot. Comics star Mark Millar commented that he'd approached Warner Bros with such a plan, after saying that an unnamed yet well-known director had asked him to help him come up with a pitch. Millar was looking to do a trilogy of pictures, but it's understood that by this stage in 2008, Warner Bros was listening to ideas from many writers, none of whom it appears has yet given the studio the magic bullet that it seeks.

It was in the summer of 2008 that it finally, publicly, voiced its thoughts on Superman Returns and its search for a follow-up. "'Superman' didn't quite work as a film in the way that we wanted it to," Warner Bros Pictures group president Jeff Rubinov told the Wall Street Journal. "It didn't position the character the way he needed to be positioned. Had 'Superman' worked in 2006, we would have had a movie for Christmas of this year or 2009 ... But now the plan is just to reintroduce Superman without regard to a Batman and Superman movie at all."

And that seems to be where Warner Bros is sitting right now. Bryan Singer had originally intended to move from Valkyrie to his second Superman movie, with the promise to go "all Wrath Of Khan on it". Yet Valkyrie has been and gone, and while there's been no official confirmation one way or the other, you can't help but think that if Singer was still on the project, it would at the least be talked about. Instead, neither he nor Warner Bros seem able to say much on the matter one way or the other. Singer, incidentally, has four projects listed on IMDB Pro at various stages of development, and not one of them is a Superman sequel.

Warner Bros also seems reluctant to press the green light on a new Superman movie until, it seems, it thinks it's got a better chance of making more cash off it. And, to be blunt, the focus is clearly more on Batman - which has turned again into a massive cash cow - than the man in the blue tights. In fact, at the end of last year, DC Comics president Paul Levitz admitted that "Everyone is waiting for Nolan to sign on for another Batman, once that happens, the release date for Superman and all other future projects will follow."

Given that Christopher Nolan's future in the bat-chair is itself the subject of some intense rumour, it's perhaps understandable that Warner Bros is keener to establish the fate of the next Batman movie than it is the new Superman film. Bluntly, we'd be surprised to see either any time before 2012.

For the one constant throughout all of this was that Brandon Routh was likely to return as the Man Of Steel, but today's story (here) even throws that into doubt. Routh's contract to play Superman has expired, and that could, in theory, allow Warner Bros just to hit a firm reset button, and start the whole thing from scratch again. In fact, as time progresses, you can't help but feel that's the more likely option here. The chances of Bryan Singer directing, certainly, seem all but gone, and with only McG among Hollywood directors expressing public interest in the project - and you can't imagine that Terminator: Salvation will have helped his chances - then the whole project remains very much in limbo, several years after work began on it.

Will Superman return again? It's inevitable, and Warner Bros knows it. But given even the failure of The Incredible Hulk to concrete over the first Hulk movie for Marvel, it knows it's got one hell of a job on its hands...

 

Tags

Users Comments

Re: So what’s happened with the Superman Returns sequel?
Posted By stueyd67 1 July 6, 2009 11:29:23 AM

Whilst watching this film, i was visibly cringeing. The greatest evil mastermind in the world....runs out of petrol. Oh dear. And dont get me started on Superson.....

Re: So what’s happened with the Superman Returns sequel?
Posted By cordas 1 July 6, 2009 11:42:48 AM

Superman Returns was boring, over dawn, lackluster garbage.... For him to make a successful return i think they need to actually write a decent script and then worry about the special effects/stunt sequences....

Re: So what’s happened with the Superman Returns sequel?
Posted By Malky 1 July 6, 2009 11:59:43 AM

Superman just does not fit in today's world. He is totally invincible to everything but kryptonite. Oh look the bad guys have kryptonite did not see that coming at all. He is too boring with no edge, I know he is the first superhero but time has passed for him much like Captain America.

Re: So what’s happened with the Superman Returns sequel?
Posted By adalvare 1 July 6, 2009 02:01:49 PM

I am not sure what they could do with this franchise. We all know the story. The fact that he had a son is just annoying. They need the film to be action packed and have Superman truly challenged. How they do that I do not know.

Re: So what’s happened with the Superman Returns sequel?
Posted By cordas 1 July 6, 2009 02:19:10 PM

Like Batman, the X men, Spiderman, John Mclane, John Connor, Indy e.t.c aren't invincible... Lets face it the hero of 99.9999% of movies survives, well unless its a movie franchise in which case they are always going to survive. Its not a question of worrying about the hero, its about being able to tell a decent story that people will buy into. There is plenty of scope for a new Superman movie.... all it needs to work is a decent script that engages the audience, and makes them hungry for more... When I went to see Batman Begins the 1st thing my mate said to me was "I want a sequel now!!!". When we saw Superman Returns the 1st thing I said was "god my arse is numb" to which my mate replied "beer".

Re: So what’s happened with the Superman Returns sequel?
Posted By RandyTheFool 1 July 6, 2009 02:19:43 PM

adalvare: "They need the film to be action packed and have Superman truly challenged. How they do that I do not know." Pit him against a villain that wants to do more than deal in real-estate scams?

Re: So what’s happened with the Superman Returns sequel?
Posted By Malky 1 July 6, 2009 02:45:28 PM

@cordas yes they survive but they can be hurt, shot stabbed tortured etc. These are all dramatic devices. Superman is invincible and can crush peoples skulls with his thumb and forefinger. His opponents are hopelessly mismatched. You can not put him in danger without Kryptonite which appears to be about as common as quartz

Re: So what’s happened with the Superman Returns sequel?
Posted By neozyem 1 July 6, 2009 03:14:50 PM

superman vs. batman - frank miller - dark knight graphic comic, where batman kicks superman's booty. I wanna see that.

Re: So what’s happened with the Superman Returns sequel?
Posted By cordas 1 July 6, 2009 04:21:01 PM

@Malky, then you just have to give him people he cares about and put them in danger... In clever and ingenious ways where he can't just use his super powers to save them... I dunno like the Comic, TV show, earlier films, tv spin offs, comic spin offs e.t.c. have all done quite easily...... Not to sound patronising but it ain't rocket science....

Re: So what’s happened with the Superman Returns sequel?
Posted By CymbalKiller 1 July 6, 2009 05:11:53 PM

Well, even though the movie was a disappointment, it didn’t COMPLETELY suck. They could do fine with just picking up where it left off and bringing in Braniac, or Bizzaro…or, even breaking Luthor out of jail for round 2 (umm…5?). One thing though: if they do Doomsday—if they try, at all, to be faithful to the comic (which they’d better, but I’m not holding my breath)—there are a couple of things they should keep in mind: 1. Doomsday’s origin in the comic was so amazing that it would be absolutely criminal not to include it in the movie. 2. It’ll have to be AT LEAST 3 movies: The Death of Superman, The Return of Superman (with the 4 ‘fake’ Supermen—but not Shaq!!) and The REAL Return of Superman. I say ‘at least’ because some, if not all, of these should take more than one movie. 3. They can’t do it right until they introduce the JLA. To show proper scale, Doomsday has to beat the crap out of everyone BEFORE he gets to Superman. I can see a really cool SFX moment where they do an x-ray shot of Doomsday breaking Superman’s arm, like in Romeo Must Die (Jet Li). When that happens, a close-up of Superman’s shocked expression would be priceless. Anyway, Hollywood being what it is, I’m not hopeful for any faithful-to-the-comic renderings of ANYTHING with Superman. Sadly, they just can’t afford to give it the time it deserves. They’d prefer to fill up 2 hours with ridiculous things like Superman’s kid (?!?). But, hey, I can dream, can’t I? Oh, and they can’t do anything with the kid until at least the 6th movie, when he gets out of high school, or something. With flashbacks to incidents from childhood (using truck tires as teething rings, etc). But, that’s an equine of a different hue.

Re: So what’s happened with the Superman Returns sequel?
Posted By CymbalKiller 1 July 6, 2009 05:14:25 PM

Ok, note to self: "Hard returns for paragraph breaks . . . ."

Re: So what’s happened with the Superman Returns sequel?
Posted By Davros 1 July 6, 2009 09:58:02 PM

Why can't they take a very good comic storyline from Supermans history & just film that, a great story of Superman being Superman. No angst, no reboot, no superbratz, just an established character with an established set of sub characters that we all already know (Lois, Jimmy, Perry etc) Just a great film with a good story & loads of action. It would work ya know.

Re: So what’s happened with the Superman Returns sequel?
Posted By n8thebate 1 November 29, 2009 08:09:43 AM

I just want to say(and just did), if Superman doesn't fit into todays society, then neither does integrity, morals, truth, justice, and the American way. Sure he's not as vulnerable as Batman but he's purley original. And if you can't appreciate a timless classic like that then I don't know why you even bother posting anything about the character. So that statement is completely bogus that he's "out-dated" or what ever. I didn't hate Superman Returns (really at all) and appreciated Singer's efforts, (hell it wasn't like it was Indy 4). I think they should keep the director and cast on the sequel. What they should do, however, is focus on a really unique twist. Like take the original Christopher Reeves Superman movies, In the 2nd one Superman saves Lois from a bomb that is hidden in the Eifel Tower. He does this by throwing the bomb into space. Great he saved the day. Now what he doesn't know is that the bomb sets off a chain reacttion releasing Zod, and his counter parts, from the portal they were stuck in from the first movie, by Superman's deseased Father(Marlon Brando/Jor-El). See Superman intended to do something good,but accidentally did something bad. The new Superman sequel should have a twist like this... Its complex,yet easy to follw, and really showcases the morals of Superman. Someone we can all aspire to be like.You see Superman has morals and can come do the right thing every time because of his imortality, thats why he's one of the greatest... A great quote I heard puts things into perspective "America see's itself as Superman, but the rest of the world see's America as Batman..."

Re: So what’s happened with the Superman Returns sequel?
Posted By batmanologist 1 January 29, 2010 03:36:38 AM

1st of all lets think back to brian singer doing xmen...the 1st 2 movies were terrible. he left the last stand to make superman returns and in the end the last stand grossed more than superman returns. the biggest problem with superman all dates back to whenever kevin smith was fired. superman is the same old same old lex luthor...WHO CARES. Its time to bring in brainiac, bizarro, composite superman, i mean anything is better than gene hackman or kevin spacey. Also lets get a Superman who knows how to throw a punch. Superman Returns is the biggest let down and in my opinion i would rather sit through something like Ghost Rider. Movie Studios are concernd with money. Get someone who knows what they are doing. Spend time on Krypton. I mean god make a Superman origions or something and go from there. Batman messed up 4 times and has finally gotten it right with Nolan. Bring Kevin Smith in to write and direct or let Nolan tackle both of the greatest super heros of all time.

Re: So what’s happened with the Superman Returns sequel?
Posted By jokerboy75 1 March 10, 2010 09:57:43 PM

I agree with most tht the last film lacked sustainable action but, Routh shud def return as the man of steel as he played the part perfectly(in my opinion), maybe for the new film introduce doomsday or a collection and as millar has put forward make it in2 a trilogy along the lines of the matrix or pirates films where the story carries over.
Post a Comment
 
Superman

When are you coming back, Superman?

Follow Den of Geek on

Related Articles

SEARCH

Broadband

Mobile Broadband

Compare over 100 mobile broadband & broadband deals online!

Mobile Phones

LG ArenaHTC Magic

Compare over 250 mobile phones &
52,000 deals!

Click Here