Crossbones: The Covenant Review
After a shaky start, Crossbones finds its sea legs a little in episode number two. Here's our review.
Crossbones comes on strong with its second episode. A flash of a ship, pirate politics, a damn good fight, and not quite so much sneaking around. Itās a little more pirate-like (still not enough.)Ā But seeing the reason behind some of these goings-on gives me a much better handle on the showās characters.
We open with a short summary, followed by a brief flash of hooded men on a ship.
Cut to Blackbeard and Selima. It seems that this woman ā the mathematician, the one who nearly let Blackbeard die in the previous episode, is the object of Blackbeardās affection. He pursues her. She gives him advice.
If the chronometer was a little unbelievable before, though, we now have a submarine. A submarine with a blindfolded Spanish passenger. This Spaniard showed up last time to give Lowe an excuse to save Blackbeardās life. Now it seems that this mysterious figure will be a season-long mystery. Iām willing to accept this, but please lay off the submarine.
The fellow in the hood is Sam Valentine, another pirate captain. Valentine says he used to āloveā Blackbeard, calls him Eddie (Edward Teach) and feels free to tell stories about him. But itās not logical. If Valentine was Eddieās old friend, he turns on him far to fast.Ā These two ought to be plotting together, discussing, talking of old times, and drinking much rum. Instead we get a simple statement of Blackbeardās plan (Not too stupid. Not really based in the real world, either, but not entirely stupid) and Valentine just gives a flat ānoā with no further discussion, and no negotiation.
Now, itās clear that there is a little envy here. Valentine says of Blackbeardās kingdom āI thought it would be bigger.ā He hands out some shit about how Blackbeard just decided to call himself āCommodoreā and later tells some stories about his hostās previous behavior.
The story heās improvising from has been written so often that people watching may already know it. In the original tale, Blackbeard accidently shoots his faithful second-in-command, Israel Hands, and when Hands complains, says something along the lines of āIf I donāt shoot one of you now and again, youāll forget who I am.ā Except in Valentineās version Blackbeard was already in the process of killing another member of his crew in cold blood when he wounds Hands, and upon hearing Handsā complaint, Blackbeard shoots him in the head before uttering the famous line.
In short, Valentine’s rage that his old friend has made himself a king is palpable. Once again, though, itās done without any warmth. If these two were such good friends once, why did Valentine change? For, though the story is supposed to show the rage that Valentine has for his friend Eddieās high-handed behavior, it also shows that Blackbeard was always like this. So whatās the big deal all of a sudden?
Plotline two involves Lowe and the former Jacobite James Balfour (Peter Stebbings). Yes, there was a Jacobite uprising (neatly summed up by Lowe as āYou thought the wrong king was on the throne.) And backing the wrong king explains why, when the ārightā king won, people like Balfour were jailed and tortured. And it makes sense that his wife Kate (Claire Foy) would do anything to get him out⦠But Kate, you didnāt āGive up everything, even (your) countryā for your husband. He pretty much took care of that himself when he backed the wrong side in the fight between kings.
Itās good to have this explanation, though, and good to watch Kate, the sensualist, beg Lowe, whom she has the hots for, to help her husband, literally, get back on his feet. Thatās unlikely to happen (though this is fiction, and I wouldnāt rule it out.) No, Lowe gives James a pep talk, and he invalid man doesnāt show a huge change in attitude, when his wife gives him enough encouragement, he does return her affection.
I like the fight between Blackbeard and his three would-be assassins. The organization of it worked for me, and using the heavy brass bell as a weapon was appropriate and innovative. I also liked the small bit of throwing the bones, as the only things available. If only this had been a movie, or Malkovich was a better combat actor. In spite of the emphatic sound effects, some of the punches were too obviously pulled. With more filming time, they might have gotten it better.
I like the outcome of the fight even better, though itās a shame the writers felt the need to get Lowe involved. Still, I understand it. If they had only put Valentine on the scaffold, the audience wouldnāt have been nearly so emotionally involved.
Yes, Blackbeard is a real bastard, slippery as a snake, and willing to do anything to get his way. Robbery, murder, torture, killing an old friend, itās all just part of the dayās work. This is in the best fictional tradition of Blackbeard. Not true, of course, but in the tradition, which I respect. So Iām enjoying this a little more, and looking forward to the next one.
Bonus Feature:
This is really historically accurate, right?
Well, a little. Obviously, by 1729 Blackbeard was long dead. And people were a long, long way from inventing the submarine. But some other things have been nagging me, and Iād like to share.
First, when I heard the name āSamā I was really hoping it was Blackbeardās historically accurate friend, Sam Bellamy. Bellamy died in 1717, but that never stopped a writer yet. I wonder if the writers originally wanted it to be Bellamy, and changed their minds. āBlack Samā was a real fanatic on the subject of democracy. He even cut the tall quarterdeck off his ship, so he would not stand higher than the men he captained.
But such a historical figure would have to put up more of a fight than our man Valentine.
Next: If you donāt break your neck when youāre hanged, it does not take ādaysā to strangle. Twenty minutes is about average. I canāt quite imagine why they wrote Valentine hanging there, alive, except to give Lowe an excuse to shoot him. I hope they make something out of it.
But the means of hanging, the low scaffold, with a stool under the feet that gets kicked out, is pretty accurate. Bravo for that.
Some excuse is given for why the chronometer will end piracy, and thatās a good thing. If sailors now exactly where they are, itās said, they wonāt follow the trade routes, and pirates wonāt know where to find them. But trade routes werenāt only used because navigation was so far from exact. Sailing ships were dependent on wind and water, and trade routes followed the places where currents and winds made the ship go in the direction the crew wanted her to. We still have trade routes today, for the same reason. So thatās for the effort, but no, thatās not true.
And lastly āCommodoreā is a ridiculous title for Blackbeard to have chosen for himself. A commodore is the man in charge of a flotilla of ships. Most good pirate captains were commodores of at least a small flotilla at one time or another, as they captured ships and held them for a while. But itās a temporary rank, and itās no big deal. āPrinceā ācommander,ā even āpresidentā would have been more sensible.
And last, while not historically wrong, a pretty good piece of the Pirates of the Caribbean soundtrack shows up during the brothel scene. Wonder what they paid Disney for that?
Or did they just pirate it?
Like us onĀ FacebookĀ and follow us onĀ TwitterĀ for all news updates related to the world of geek. AndĀ Google+, if that’s your thing!