Den of Geek

Doctor Who series 5 episode 2: The Beast Below review

Simon Brew


Politics. Choices. Scary Smilers. The Beast Below packs those in, as well as a tough adventure for The Doctor and Amy. Here's our review of the latest Doctor Who...

Published on Apr 9, 2010


PLEASE NOTE: THIS REVIEW CONTAINS SPOILERS. OUR SPOILER-FREE REVIEW IS HERE

The general consensus come the end credits of The Eleventh Hour seemed to be that the new era of Doctor Who was off to a good, solid start (that's a little bit of an understatement). But for me, it’s this second episode I’ve been waiting for, The Beast Below.

For this is the second standalone Steven Moffat-scripted instalment of the series, but the first that’s freed of the need to bring in and introduce two new faces to the show. As such, here we get to find out just what he can do with an early season episode, the kind that’s often forgotten about several weeks down the line.

That won’t be happening here, though. For The Beast Below was very good indeed.

It worked on more than one level too. At heart, it often felt like a traditional old-style Doctor Who episode, with corridors to explore, an enemy observing the Doctor investigating the strangeness around him, and the constant feel of a greater threat waiting to be discovered. Long time followers of the show have seen that kind of build up many times before, and it was fun to see it again here.

But while the structure may have felt familiar, the flesh put on the bones was really something quite special.

Firstly, this was an episode where we saw the imperfections in the relationship between The Doctor and Amy begin to develop. Certainly in the early stages, they appeared to be a solid working match, sharing an upbeat and wide-eyed view of the world.

But in the early stages, Amy starts to probe – most tellingly when asking if the Doctor had ever had children – and she starts to learn about one or two of the gaps in his backstory. We know, of course, about the story of the Time Lords (it was only at Christmas, after all), but to Amy, it’s all fresh.

It also proves to be crucial information in its own way come the denouement of the episode, when – as the Doctor tries to resolve things in the same old way – it takes Amy to work out what’s staring them in the face, because ironically the Doctor can’t.

It was Amy that ultimately adhered more to his rule set, and it was Amy that saved the day. It was really well done, and brought them back together as a working team by the end of the episode. But it’s good to see just a little bit of unease and friction working its way in there. Star-crossed lovers this pair absolutely aren't.

The central story itself was timed to perfection to arrive in the midst of an election campaign in the UK. We find that most of Britain is now a floating spaceship, one without an engine as it transpires, where the people are allowed to know the truth about what’s basically kept them safe, and are given the instant opportunity to either protest or forget once they know the full horror of it. It’s an episode full of choices, and the political subtext is neatly worked in. Society as a whole thus chooses to forget, has their minds wiped, and goes about their everyday lives, freed from knowing what keeps them alive.

It inevitably draws comparison with the Doctor Who team of the late 1980s and the subtexts that they wove into their stories. Moffat has more than picked up the mantle, and crafted it extremely well. Heck, I even got a bit of a vibe of The Happiness Patrol at one point.

But back to The Beast Below. The ongoing message of the series already is to look carefully, and the Doctor’s attention is thus drawn to the Smilers, creatures in boxes that look too clean to be a genuine part of the world. His instinct proves correct, and once more, Steven Moffat comes up with quite an effective, creepy monster. The irony, of course, is it’s not the Smilers that prove to be the main problem.

Instead, it’s those buttons that allow the wiping of knowledge in an instant. They, ultimately, are the biggest enemy in the episode. This is brought terrifically to the fore with the decision that Liz 10 can’t make when she’s put in front of a screen with the option to reign for another decade and keep the status quo, or to free the tortured creature that we learn is powering the starship and abdicate. It takes a youthful mind – Amy’s - to overcome the fear of making that call.

This is an episode that's set to stick in the mind some time after the credits roll, not least the moment where Moffat takes the Doctor into darker territory. For the Doctor’s solution to the dilemma of potentially killing the residents of the British ship or allowing the starwhale creature to remain tortured is to basically mentally kill it. The uneasiness of Matt Smith’s Doctor headed a little into Patrick Troughton territory at this point, and it was great to see.

After all, it arguably took some time to take Tennant’s Doctor this far (culminating, of course, in the wonderful The Waters Of Mars), yet Moffat seems keen to waste little time in exploring the darker sides of the Doctor’s existence. That bodes extremely well, and he also demonstrates why the Doctor has been so missing a full-time assistant over the past year and a half.

On the downside of the episode? Some of the effects work, mainly. It was fine when looking at exteriors of the floating Britain, but it did struggle whenever it had to focus in on the starwhale in any of its forms. If you were being picky, you might also suggest that the character of Liz 10 wasn’t the strongest, but she was well played, and served a crucial story purpose.

Yet, it's hard to really complain, for The Beast Below was a strong and subtlety complex episode. I counted more than one Star Wars nod in there (although that might just be me!), and I loved the way it tied into the next adventure, Victory Of The Daleks (and just how good is that looking?). One adventure flowing wonderfully into the next? More of that please.

Likewise, there's another hint to the series' underlying story arc with the crack we see at the end of the the episode. Is this a hint that we've not seen the last of the Atraxi perhaps? Or are bigger forces at work?

That's for future weeks, though. Most of all here, we loved the way that Steven Moffat took a series of strong ideas, wove them together with a skill that few writers working in television today could manage, and still packed together a 45 minute episode of high quality Saturday night science fiction.

And we couldn’t help thinking that if this is what Steven Moffat can do with episode two of a series run, that we should be in for a hell of a treat by the time his closing two-parter comes around in two months time.

Next time: the Daleks. For once, I can’t wait to see them again…

Our review of last week's episode, The Eleventh Hour, is here.

Check out the new and ever growing Doctor Who page at DoG, where we are marshalling all the Who content at the site, including interviews, DVD and episode reviews, lists, opinions and articles on our favourite time traveller...

 

Tags

Users Comments

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 2: The Beast Below review
Posted By 04BennettCH 1 April 10, 2010 06:13:13 PM

That was bloody brilliant, on par with the girl in the fireplace (my fav). I think this season may turn out to be the best of the new series.

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 2: The Beast Below review
Posted By MadProphet 1 April 10, 2010 06:14:14 PM

"Help me, Doctor- you're my only hope" was the Star Wars nod, eh? Loving the way each episode cliffhangers out now, all tying back to that crack. Daleks should make for great viewing, but this week's episode was wonderful too.

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 2: The Beast Below review
Posted By fermanaghcon 1 April 10, 2010 06:25:27 PM

pretty good episode bring on the churchill/dalek story!

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 2: The Beast Below review
Posted By dynamicthinking 1 April 10, 2010 06:25:51 PM

Overall, a great episode. However, there were a few moments where I thought they could have done with a longer running time.

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 2: The Beast Below review
Posted By viridis 1 April 10, 2010 06:32:11 PM

I punched the air when the Doctor pressed the Protest Button. "I'm bringing down the government!" That was awesome. The Doctor in a nutshell. Bloody brilliant, yes, and very subtle, and I can't wait to see more of Smith's Dark!Doctor, especially knowing the Daleks are up next. Horror, adventure, a child's excitement rushes over me... My younger brother walked in on me halfway through the episode and he didn't understand any of it, didn't like it... They just don't get how marvellous this show is. And with Daleks and Angels in River Song and Steven Moffat at the helm it will only get better! Geronimo!

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 2: The Beast Below review
Posted By DCDJ18 1 April 10, 2010 06:41:05 PM

I was unfortunately really quite disappointed by this - the first half in particular. It just felt like 'Doctor Who by numbers', except painted with a slightly duller paint selection. The final exposition was good, but not enough to save it. So much of the dialogue felt clichéd (e.g. the Queen telling the Doctor that she'd find him in response to his asking), and the opening bits (ominous mentioning of scary thing by children, meet character that's slightly rebelling but hasn't got all the facts, gang of sinister things sit about the place etc.) I mean I know it's always a bit predictable, bit it felt formulaic. On the plus side, the Doctor and Amy were the best bits, and anything involving just them that didn't have some annoying minor character getting in the way was good. The next one looks much better though.

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 2: The Beast Below review
Posted By mark-reed 1 April 10, 2010 07:19:04 PM

So what decision does the BBC make about its most exported, most watched, highest profile show with the longest viewing profile in history? Oh yes. Cut the effects budget so the monsters look cheaper than the shark in "Escape From LA". Well done, Beeb.

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 2: The Beast Below review
Posted By tombombadil66 1 April 10, 2010 07:53:28 PM

I enjoyed this episode. It somehow feels better than the previous run, more subtle and layered. I especially liked the English iconography and the small details that reminded me of The Prisoner and The Avengers, i.e. the hooded figures, the Smilers, the gas dispensing from the ring and the political 'choices'. Hopefully, this will series will continue to get better. It would be nice if Moffat could do a four-parter in future with a longer story. It worked with Torchwood to much critical acclaim and would be a lovely nod to the old days.

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 2: The Beast Below review
Posted By xxnapoleonsolo 1 April 10, 2010 08:51:22 PM

I love how Moffat makes everything so layered, so children watch it and love the adventure but the older viewer is rewarded too with some deeper themes and ideas. Like the Doctor and the water or an extra door, you can see different things by looking at the same object in a different way. That is massively skilled by Moffat and bodes well for the weeks ahead.

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 2: The Beast Below review
Posted By Smithusama 1 April 10, 2010 09:39:04 PM

I can say that after this episode my fears of Matt Smith not being able to live up to my high standards as set by the likes of Tom Baker or David Tennant are now completely gone. I believe that he contributes an amazing amount to the show and that he is perfectly suited to act out the new personality the Doctor seems to be forming. Karen Gillan supports him and her fun persona really brings out the good side of the show for all to see. Although at some points in this episode I believed that it could be improved slightly, my overall opinion is that it was very well written and performed and it really showed how the Doctor thinks in certain situations and explains deeply how he sometimes needs a companion from doing something he will regret. Also, as you mentioned the crack in your review, I believe it is a sign of a higher power than the atraxi as mentioned by Prisoner Zero just before it is taken captive once again. My overall score for this episode is 4/5 stars.

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 2: The Beast Below review
Posted By smolemon 1 April 10, 2010 09:41:03 PM

WHAT? did I miss something here - I thought it was dull and predictable. The support acting was below par and the story was clunky to say the least. Also, The noticeable budget cuts are so off putting - saying that, the star whale looked good from the outside. The crack in space/time is intriguing me though - so I suppose I can't complain about bad episodes like this - I just hope something comes up that keep me watching week after week. by the way, did anyone else laugh when the doctor tried doing angry? it was terrible! ...anyway - just my opinion! roll on next week, restore my geeky faith!!

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 2: The Beast Below review
Posted By Mawson 1 April 10, 2010 09:45:47 PM

Maybe its just that I'm old enough to remember and enjoy the classic series. But, really, I think the effects are good. The story and acting of the leads was great. Thats what I want from my Who. Effects are a very secondary consideration in my view.

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 2: The Beast Below review
Posted By explodingzebras 1 April 10, 2010 10:22:09 PM

The Star Whale reminded me of the turtle in Terry Pratchett. Anyway can't wait for next week!

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 2: The Beast Below review
Posted By Angostura 1 April 10, 2010 11:31:46 PM

Not bad, but some nasty continuity problems at the beginning - keep an eye on the Smiler as little Timmy is going down in the lift. Looks to me as if they did a little reshoot, but didn't have the budget to redo all the shots.

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 2: The Beast Below review
Posted By Lachesis 1 April 10, 2010 11:43:15 PM

What i am enjoying is the fact that, in these two episodes, we the audience have been able to learn of the story along with the Doctor...it is traditional Who and quite diferent from the RTD era where more often than not episodes simply threw everything at the wall till the Doctor 'remebered' everything he needed to pull a bizarre rabbit out of the hat.

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 2: The Beast Below review
Posted By Dutchface 1 April 10, 2010 11:58:48 PM

I know SM can write a good episode, I sure we can all see that. I'm just wondering what he's going to be asking of his other writers and how well their episodes pan out :D

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 2: The Beast Below review
Posted By madforit89 1 April 11, 2010 12:31:58 AM

the story of an incarsarated alien being used for something a bit over done. did we not have that in Torchwood. did it not also happen in Star trek. Episode 1 brilliant, episode 2 run of the mill! Episode 3 looks fantastic, but then the Darleks always are. Not really sure how they sems to always get out of the temporal time wars that are locked down, about 5 times now. And the poor old Timelords managed once, and they required James Bond to pull that off!

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 2: The Beast Below review
Posted By revolution 1 April 11, 2010 01:07:09 AM

After a good start with the eleventh hour, Moffat delivers a really good second helping with The Beast Below. The relationship between The Doctor and Amy took on a added complexity and dimension whilst the storyline was well done - slowly unravelling the mystery behind the big secret. Matt Smith has done the seemingly impossible and eased into the role of the Doctor - his slightly more off key depiction creates his own slant on Tennants version. I like the fact the doctor can be wrong, can perhaps not be all knowing in deciding the right action to follow. Makes for a far more interesting dynamic and ride. Only quibbles? - the supporting acting was passable and sadly the fx once again look out of place - BBC has scored an own goal by budget cutting on what is one of their few rare remaining global brands programmes. So thats 2 hits in a row... now comes that difficult third album - tho judging by the previews, the return of the daleks looks darn exciting! Let the adventure continue indeed... Geronimo!

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 2: The Beast Below review
Posted By Headache2112 1 April 11, 2010 05:20:22 AM

A surprisingly predictable episode. It was obvious what the "beast below" was from the past few months of trailers. The Doctor giving a lesson in seeing everything and recognizing everything for what it is was strong, but then when he himself neglected to do either of those things, well that simply created disappointment in the character. Smith is good as the Doctor and Karen Gillan is wonderful as Amy. I don't understand why Liz 10 was 300 years old. Do humans live that long in the century the episode takes place? The Smilers were very creepy to begin with, but then amounted to absolutely nothing. We weren't even made to care very much for the little boy who "just showed up" at the end after seemingly falling to his death at the top of the show. The special effects seemed fine to me though. The actor portraying Winston Churchill in the next episode looks nothing whatsoever like Churchill. Hopefully his acting will be strong enough to make me forget that. The trailer for next week's episode wasn't very enticing, though I'll certainly be there for it. Oh, and I am most definitely already sick of "Geronimo".

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 2: The Beast Below review
Posted By roncook 1 April 11, 2010 05:49:01 AM

Nothing horribly wrong with it - especially for a fan whose been with the show since the 1960s - special effects look about normal to me - but it felt like it could have been a two-parter with more content. Suddenly the Cockney Queen appears and everything seems to get tied up pdq. As for the Doctor's "three options" well I will be generous and assume post-regeneration problems. Overall good, but not great.

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 2: The Beast Below review
Posted By Zokko 1 April 11, 2010 06:30:59 AM

'The Beast Below' was utter bollocks. Its strange how fans can accept the idea of a city flying through space on the back of a whale and yet had problems with Earth towed by the Tardis in 'Journey's End'. Matt and Amy were great but the episode sucked on all levels. Moffat even stole the garbage compactor scene from 'Star Wars'! Has the man no shame? R.T.D. should return to show him how it should be done.

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 2: The Beast Below review
Posted By hammondsgc 1 April 11, 2010 06:32:25 AM

Did you notice that the "hole in the road" was outside Magpie Electricals ("The Wire")? Nice touch

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 2: The Beast Below review
Posted By LittleTime 1 April 11, 2010 08:44:37 AM

Star Wars nods: 1. Help us [Doctor], you're my our only hope". 2. The garbage compacter. 3. Being trapped on the tongue of a giant creature (the space slug from Empire). 4. My favorite, there is a fast sideways fade transitioning from on scene to another.

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 2: The Beast Below review
Posted By Codgin 1 April 11, 2010 10:49:37 AM

I like how people are just so eager to complain about the who, compare this episode to all "Secondary or future episodes" before it in the new series, and it really does stand up. the only real problem was that there were so many ideas in the ep it could have really done with a two parter to balance it out. And to the guy comparing this to the tardis pulling earth through space. Consider this the whale is simply carrying a spaceship on its back. BUT the Tardis was pulling an entire planet, which would cause countless disasters, so it's a different kettle of fish And RTD was a great writer but Moffat holds credit for the best eps in the series And as for the nods when you're not stealing an idea simply giving it a glancing nod, its just fun

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 2: The Beast Below review
Posted By mark-reed 1 April 11, 2010 12:29:37 PM

Saying these effects are good compared to the 1984 incarnation is like saying a punch in the face is comparable to a kick in the balls : the standard now is higher, and one of the weaknesses of old Who was 'Bloke In A Rubber Suit Running In A Quarry' syndrome.

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 2: The Beast Below review
Posted By TheRahman 1 April 11, 2010 02:47:00 PM

I disagree. I thought the acting was terrible. Like it was the first time they had shot as a team. It was so bad, I was almost cringing. Especially the Queen. She was terrible. I liked the 1st episode, but i am starting to wonder if Dr Who and Philosophers Stone. Oh, and the story was a pile of cack.

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 2: The Beast Below review
Posted By mcfangirl 1 April 11, 2010 04:30:37 PM

2 weeks in and I'm convinced I'm watching a different series than everyone else! For a second week in a row there was rehash galore! 'you look human, you look timelord' - Easter 2009 anyone? I thought this was an ep full of good ideas and scenes that was poorly executed. The acting left much to be desired tbh especially Eleven's anger. I look on horrified that that was supposed to pass for anger and this would've been a VERY SERIOUS issue for the Doctor... and THAT was his response?! For proper anger may I refer you to an episode called New Earth. One of my biggest problems with the ep content was Amy's recording. WHEN was that recorded or am I just dense? I'm hanging all hope on the Dalek ep but so far this series for me has been a bunch of fanfare over a bunch of crap. Oh and the fact that effects were crappy in Classic Who does NOT excuse crappy effects in this day and age. Overall, an even greater disappointment than the first ep.

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 2: The Beast Below review
Posted By smitty 1 April 11, 2010 05:31:41 PM

@mcfangirl - Amy made the recording just before she "forgot" - you see her wiping the same dirt smudge from her eye as you do before she watches the playback. You don't see her making the recording one, to show that she's already forgotten making it, and two, because it would be boring for the audience to watch it twice.

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 2: The Beast Below review
Posted By Jenni 1 April 11, 2010 07:08:12 PM

@mcfangirl1- In total agreement! I love Moffat, but not loving these firsts eps. I said last week, i like Amy more than i like the doctor, that's not right!

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 2: The Beast Below review
Posted By Interference 1 April 11, 2010 07:50:59 PM

you can totally tell from these comments who watches trailers and episodes over and over again. Remembering lines from Planet of the Dead? What!? Sick of 'Geronimo'? He's said it twice, it's your own fault for watching the trailers 20 times in a row with a box of kleenex.

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 2: The Beast Below review
Posted By Codgin 1 April 11, 2010 08:23:42 PM

im starting to wish whos viewing figures did drop just to lose the idiots, I mean Matt Smith is a great actor, and he's playing a more old school doctor, and the joy of a doctor changing is each doctor being different which smith is. Why are people moaning about that? This ep is the second ep of the season, normally 2nd eps are not the greatest same as the first, but alas it was a strong ep with a clever plot were everything was relevant and built up as the episodes continued, good story telling. Stop ya bitching and just enjoy it for what it is family entertainment

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 2: The Beast Below review
Posted By smolemon 1 April 11, 2010 10:29:59 PM

Codgin 1 - I don't think people are "bitching", just airing their opinions. All these people here will keep watching it because it's..well because it's Doctor Who! lol. Everyone watches it for different reasons. I think we may have been spoiled by waters of mars. it's hard to come back to the cheesy jokes etc when a character has gone so dark - even if he has regenerated.

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 2: The Beast Below review
Posted By Mawson 1 April 11, 2010 11:54:39 PM

See, I thought Waters of Mars was decent enough. But it wasn't great by any means. The threat of water as a force of nature was vey well done. But it had poorly handled elements of humour, a robot to rival Jar Jar Binks in terms of naffness and an ending that I disliked immensely. Had it been really as dark as mentioned above, it probably would have been a classic. Matt Smith is doing a grand job, I was set and ready to hate him in the role (I've never seen him on screen in anything else, and was horrified when he was cast on account of his hair) but I've had to rethink. He's clearly a talented actor and is giving a convincing perfomance as the 11th Doctor. Perhaps we haven't yet hit the heights of some of the excellent episodes of the modern Who tales (Dalek, Doctor Dances, Impossible Planet, Blink etc) but for my money its the best start to a series yet and comfortably the best start made by a new Doctor. The End of the World and New Earth were both weak episodes far eclipsed by The Beast Below. I for one am very much looking forward to seeing the continuation of this season. For those concerned by the special effects (I'm not, they look spiffing to me) it should be remembered that Doctor Who has always been about quality of script and story over standards of effects.

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 2: The Beast Below review
Posted By smolemon 1 April 12, 2010 01:10:15 AM

yeah, I agree that the episode "waters of mars" had some "naffness" lol, it is Doctor Who after all and the naffness works, its part of the charm... but I was saying the doctor character went dark, not the world he inhabits. anyway, I found this episode boring (but not as boring as some of the older episodes - "midnight" jumps to mind), very predictable, and a massive let down. I enjoyed the first episode of this series though, like the new doctor, and have high hopes for things to come :)

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 2: The Beast Below review
Posted By mcfangirl 1 April 12, 2010 02:22:38 AM

If you watched the Water of Mars and thought it was about water monsters then you clearly missed the big picture. just sayin'. As for bitching about things, I'm just sharing my comments like everyone else which MOST people don't agree with. Because it's not what YOU think it makes it "bitching", go figure. One more thing, I've seen Planet of the Dead TWICE and yes, I tend to remember dialogue. While we're at it, 'you've had some cowboys in here' in the first ep was used TWICE in The Girl in the Fireplace. >=/

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 2: The Beast Below review
Posted By cremebrulay 1 April 12, 2010 10:11:16 AM

its very sad that so many people cannot open their minds enough to accept change. and to compare a show that is effectively 2 episodes old with a show that ran for 4 years is pathetic. open your minds people and stop whining about how its all new and different. if you like the rtd/tennant era so much, go and buy it on dvd and dont watch the new show. no-one forces you to watch it, its called choice. personally i think the new team are doing a great job and can't wait for the rest of the series to pan out

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 2: The Beast Below review
Posted By The_Tomahawk_Kid 1 April 12, 2010 10:28:26 AM

My first reaction was that it was a bit too much in the typical Doctor Who formula, but on second viewing yesterday I thought it was a very good episode. I thought the Smilers were great. However, I still have some major reservations about Matt Smith - he just does not have enough presence! I could not imagine Matt carrying off an episode such as Human Nature, where DT's acting skills really came to the fore. Karen Gillan on the otherhand is a potential superstar in the making. As well as being very attractive (to say the least!), she is a great actress. In my view she is a class above Matt Smith. She seems to have far more presence than he does. I really hope the BBC haven't made a big mistake with Matt.

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 2: The Beast Below review
Posted By gifu 1 April 12, 2010 10:58:30 AM

Didn't think Waters of Mars was all about the water monsters, but I also thought it was rubbish (just saying!). I liked The Beast Below, but did think that the story (and its resolution) was too obvious and telegraphed too early. I have been quite surprised by how much I like the new doctor, but I think a lot of that might just be that it's no longer about Tennant leaving, like it has been for the past 2 years or so. Who is much, much bigger than Tennant and RTD, and in fact I would say better for the departure of both after the disappointment of the 4 specials

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 2: The Beast Below review
Posted By Omniaural 1 April 12, 2010 11:45:30 AM

I'm the Queen and I RULE!!

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 2: The Beast Below review
Posted By Omniaural 1 April 12, 2010 11:49:50 AM

I think this new series is a promising start. As someone who had been disappointed by the end of RTD's reign I was hoping for something that felt different and that's what this new WHO is like. Me and my kids are liking it. Especially the new dynamic between the Doctor and Amy. Do we want it to be romantic? I'm not sure it will be. We've already been told that Amy is broken but can the Doctor fix her or will she go all nasty on him? This would be a new twist for WHO fans only familiar with the relaunched series.

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 2: The Beast Below review
Posted By TheTeacher 1 April 12, 2010 12:17:44 PM

After watching the episode a second time, I cannout find many flaws in the new series. The best second episode of a new doctor since "The Ark in Space" (did anyone else notice the similarities?). Here is hoping that the denouement of the series will be very exciting and that the cracks in the universe are more of a red hering (Something like Amy being the Rani or something would be awesome).

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 2: The Beast Below review
Posted By Mawson 1 April 12, 2010 12:21:07 PM

I think that out of loyalty to the series, I'd kept quiet. But now, having seen that Omniaural has come out and say it. I feel enabled to do that same! Yeah, I was disappointed in the end of the RTD run, in truth everything from and including "The Next Doctor" onward was poor. I never thought I'd say it out of respect for RTD having brought the Doctor back in such great form, but there.. I said it.. and I feel better for letting the truth out!!

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 2: The Beast Below review
Posted By The_Tomahawk_Kid 1 April 12, 2010 12:59:05 PM

There is more to Amy than meets the eye. Why was a little girl like her left alone at night in the house? Who is her aunt? What happened to her parents? Why didn't anyone look at the crack in her wall (if one of my children was worried about a crack in their wall I think I might try and repair it to stop them being scared)? What effect has Prisoner Zero had on Amy (living in the house with her all those years)? What happened to Amy in the twelve years before the Doctor returned? Lots of questions, some of which I hope we get resolved as the series progesses.

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 2: The Beast Below review
Posted By SarahR89 1 April 12, 2010 08:57:40 PM

I agree on all points... except that I might take issue with the idea that the 10th Doctor was slower to sweeping ultimatums. Fact is, Ten was always reactionary. His monsters - even under Moffat (the Empty Child, Girl in the Fireplace, Human Nature) - were almost always limited with the scope of their evil plans. The Tenth Doctor didn't come around to huge, horrifying, soul-scarring decisions because he didn't encounter any. "Fires of Pompeii" was probably his first planet-wide decision, and it hurt him. (This on top of the later revelation that he was carrying around all the anger and pain from sealing the Time Lords in the Time War, which is not exactly an idle decision.) Matt Smith did really well with this episode, and I think more time could easily have been spent on this story. But let's not say Ten was longer in coming to a serious conflict. After all, isn't the point that every little decision is life or death for someone?

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 2: The Beast Below review
Posted By milliemorten 1 April 12, 2010 11:12:06 PM

MS is turning out to be brilliant. And I was a seriously hardcore DT fan with huge doubts. This ep gets better and better with repeated viewing. I'm sorry but I just dont understand the negative comments on MS doing angry. I found that scene VERY effective. The anger worked for me and the final scene with Amy qas for me, very moving. Yes the CGI has suffered with budget cuts but the acting rises above it. Oh and I loved Liz 10! Made me smile, great fun.

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 2: The Beast Below review
Posted By milliemorten 1 April 12, 2010 11:39:15 PM

By the way, did anyone spot the Magpie Electricals sign? Originally from the DT and Rose ep? The one with The Wire monster?

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 2: The Beast Below review
Posted By chewedmelon 1 April 13, 2010 07:06:02 AM

Who's this Tennant bloke you're all banging on about? I'm loving this stuff.
Post a Comment
Security Code* Get another image
 
 
The Beast Below

Doctor Who: The Beast Below

Untitled Document

Follow Den of Geek on

Related Articles

SEARCH

Coke Zero
Advertisement