Den of Geek

Doctor Who: The End Of Time Part One review

Simon Brew


David Tennant takes one step closer to the exit, courtesy of the return of John Simm's The Master in Doctor Who: The End Of Time Part One...

Published on Dec 24, 2009


WARNING: THERE ARE SPOILERS IN THIS REVIEW, AND LOTS OF THEM. DON'T READ IT UNTIL YOU'VE SEEN THE EPISODE!

To this day, I sit here wondering if the finest casting decision that Russell T Davies oversaw during his tenure on Doctor Who – outside of his title stars – was the appointment of Bernard Cribbins. At times, when the generally very good The End Of Time Part One was threatening to lull a little, Cribbin’s Wilf not only steadied the ship, but also gave the episode its finest moment. The still scene in the café when, with tears forming in his eyes he practically begged The Doctor to help Donna was exceptional. Tennant was wonderfully restrained, and Bernard Cribbins was simply superb. He’s created a  moving, believable character, who seems to be at the heart of the coincidences that set up the story.

And it was a surprisingly dark tale we got for a Christmas Doctor Who episode, too (even factoring in the regular deaths in Voyage Of The Damned). That’s appreciating that we all know where this tale is heading, but even so, there was little concession in tone to the festive season. The foreboding voiceover at the start quickly brought the image of The Master into things, as if Russell T Davies was very keen to get down to business quickly. But even the post-credits first scene, where Tennant steps out of the Tardis in his holiday gear, is quickly quashed with the appearance of Ood Sigma standing in the snow. There’s no time for pratting around at all.

We’d already seen this scene, of course, when the BBC showed it during its Children In Need telethon, and in hindsight, it gets through a lot of work. Not only is everyone having dreams, not only is The Master coming, but there’s something bigger instead. What’s the something bigger? Mr Davies is understandably holding the full scope of that and a few other cards back for New Year’s Day, but things are set up quickly and efficiently here, and a lot happens in an hour.

There’s the resurrection of The Master for starters, but it’s here for this reviewer where the episode suffered the most. The bringing back to life of one of the Doctor’s deadliest enemies I thought was bordering on the wrong side of ludicrous, and it really offered a taste of what was to come for the character. It was loud, daft and over the top: themes we’ll be returning to later. It’s a shame that Alexandra Moen’s Lucy Saxon didn’t get much to do here, but the character was here to serve a narrative purpose, before going kaboom. On the plus side of the Master’s regeneration, at least it was done very quickly. A wise choice, given that it was all just a little bit silly.

Not as silly though as The Master’s subsequent transformation into an auditionee for Ang Lee’s Hulk movie. The Master jumping high into the air? That was just outright daft, and for me went against what makes him such a potent foe for the Doctor.

I’ve always loved The Master as an enemy, as he’s the one foe the Doctor faces who’s the most obvious foil for him. It’s two equals, going head to head.When you then give The Master superpowers, where he can leap over high buildings and fire bolts from his hands, you disturb the balance and make the fight a little less interesting as a consequence. That may just be me, granted, but I thought that the elements surrounding The Master were the weakest parts of The End Of Time Part One (although, to be fair, he was bonkers enough to be unsettling).

Still, they were the weakest parts of an episode I still thought was very good. Clearly much of the time was spent sliding pieces around the board, preparing us for what’s around the corner. We know, for instance, that Joshua Naismith is both rich and stupid, clawing back old Torchwood technology that may as well come with a warning notice that if you use it, you’ll screw up the world. His driving force is, apparently, immortality for his daughter. We’d wager a bit of cash, therefore, that she’ll be dead by the time the credits roll on New Year’s Day.

There were also characters brought in whose main role in the story is yet to be determined. The two cactus people – I’m not even going to attempt to spell their real name – clearly are potential allies for the next episode, and the fleeting glimpse of Timothy Dalton in Time Lord gear is arguably the most exciting little taster for what lies ahead (we didn't get the full end of episode scene with the Time Lords at the preview screening, but that end sequence of the episode we've since caught up with was terrific). The glimpse that we got sent my my geekbumps went into overdrive. The Time Lords are coming (in fact, there are billions of them technically by the end of the episode).

But perhaps the most interesting piece of the jigsaw is Donna. For the first half of the episode, she was in exactly the state she was in when we left her. Back to her usual catchphrase spouting self, oblivious to the events that led her to become the Doctor Donna.

Yet there was something more, and the first clue we got (and, to be fair, we didn’t assume that Catherine Tate had been brought back just to make up the numbers) was when she bought her Grandfather Mr Naismith’s book for Christmas. But more was to come. And her importance to the events of Doctor Who was confirmed though when the only person on the planet to not be affected by The Master’s mind-warping plan – which even took out Barack Obama (or, let’s charitably say a vaguely convincing lookalike of him) – was Donna. Wilf was exempt because he just happened to be in the chamber with radiation sealing (from the moment you saw said cabinet, you figured it had to be a plot get-out-of-jail card somehow). Donna? She’s the only person on the planet, the Doctor aside, who actually resisted it herself.

Why is that? Is that her being half-Time Lord? Whatever the explanation, she’s going to be pivotal to Part Two, clearly, which is where several other familiar faces are going to be returning.

Finally, then, there was the cliffhanger with the multiple Masters. And this, again, was daft, although I suspect it's a crowd-splitter. I can see that argument that it matches the scale of the story, for instance.

Anyway, I’ve always argued that Russell T Davies writes great cliffhangers and strong penultimate episodes. This, for me, wasn’t one of his best endings. The idea of turning pretty much everybody in the world into The Master was again just, well, a bit silly. It was entirely in keeping with the decision to turn the batshit-crazy meter on The Master through the roof, and John Simm was clearly having a ball (and testing the BBC’s wardrobe deparment to the limit). But all of a sudden it’s transformed what could have been a fascinating one vs one battle between the Doctor and The Master into a one vs eight billion. I suspect Davies has a masterplan for this, and that he’ll pull it out of the bag. But on paper at least, it makes for a less interesting fight right now.

That said, and I appreciate I may have come across over-critical here (although, in my defence, this two-parter has been top of to-watch wishlist for a long time now, so my hopes and expectations aren't low), I still thought The End Of Time Part One was very good. It managed a delicate balance between delivering a Christmas episode that the family could enjoy, and putting into place some fairly dark stepping stones for the journey ahead. That’s really no small feat when you reflect on it. And behind the camera, Euros Lyn deserves credit for his fast, flowing direction, while keeping things still when required too so that Bernard Cribbins’ eyes alone could bring a lump to the throat.

It’s clear, however you felt that the cliffhanger went, that the second part of this adventure is set to be epic Doctor Who one way or another. There’s a near feature-film length running time, a big cast and no need to pull back on the ending and save everyone this time round.

It presents a different challenge, of course, in that we know where Davies must leave the show by 9pm next Friday. But freed from both the demands of a Christmas episode, and with the world and time itself facing disaster, the blocks are now firmly in place for what could and should be a dark, enthralling final episode.

It might be an idea to put The Master on a bit of a leash, though…

Check out the new and ever growing Doctor Who page at DoG, where we are marshalling all the Who content at the site, including interviews, DVD and episode reviews, lists, opinions and articles on our favourite time traveller...

 

Tags

Users Comments

Re: Doctor Who: The End Of Time Part One review
Posted By acre2009 1 December 26, 2009 07:28:05 AM

I thought, if nothing else, that the multiple masters scene was the most hilarious doctor who scene for ages. you can't fault john simm for the charisma he brings to the role.

Re: Doctor Who: The End Of Time Part One review
Posted By viridis 1 December 26, 2009 09:24:24 AM

The ending was both the most silly and sinister scene in the history of Doctor Who. You can tell John Simm had a blast though. Firstly I was against the Master's superpowers, but then it hit me that without them he would've been a bit easy to capture now wouldn't he? Nowhere to hide, because the Doctor can somehow smell him. So he can blast away. Downside to that, he has to eat loads to keep his energy up. I thought the Master was a bit too crazy, until that DT/Simm scene when they share psychic powers and the Doctor hears it too, and the Master goes: "It's real!" Like a psychiatric patient seeing his delusions turn real. Meaning he wasn't this crazy before his first resurrection. The drums were placed inside his head, probably by the Time Lords. I figure they used the Master like the Master himself used his ring, to keep an essence of them alive, to survive. Maybe that entire scene with the thousands of Time Lords took place inside the Master's mind. It's bigger on the inside, maybe? Cribbins was amazing, but my favourite scene had to be where the two Time Lords reminisce about the past, about Gallifrey. And his laugh is pure evil.

Re: Doctor Who: The End Of Time Part One review
Posted By TheTeacher 1 December 26, 2009 09:50:37 AM

Anyone else who was reminded of Star Wars in the very last scene of this episode (cf. Palpatine, senate etc.)? "For the glory of Gallifrey, for victory etc.? Wtf? All in all a nice first part to a finale. I just hope three things: 1. That the time lords don't return for good. The doctor should remain the "last of the time lords". Although it would open many options for the next series, it really takes the drama out of the doctor's existence. [In the days of Tom Baker & Co. time lord stories were always a drag, so who needs that?] 2. No x-ray scenes any more, we had enough of them in the first part to last the whole future of the series. And no superpowers! Please, please with sugar on top! 3. Don't kill Wilf! But he is too brilliant, so I guess he will die...

Re: Doctor Who: The End Of Time Part One review
Posted By cordas2 1 December 26, 2009 10:26:16 AM

Personally I was disappointed with it, I felt the super-master was just way OTT, as said in the review the Master isn't a supervillian, he is an intelligent (if insane) enemy who battles using his wits. As for him being to easy to capture without his powers... gibberish that all depends on how it is written. I was also really annoyed with the whole Naismith story, it was just ludicrous and the idea that he 'just' wants imortality for his daughter *HUH* surely its not a one ticket machine. I quite enjoyed the multipul Masters and its an interesting idea even if the getting there was daft... Here's hoping part 2 is a lot better! I also really hope the Timelords aren't a one off appearence because to bring them back and then kill them off in one episode will just be too much imho, also they could make a great on going foil for the next season.

Re: Doctor Who: The End Of Time Part One review
Posted By DamonD 1 December 26, 2009 10:54:57 AM

"I appreciate I may have come across over-critical here..." Not at all, you were more than fair and could understandably have ripped it further. Suffice to say I liked some stuff (Cribbins & Tennat) and didn't like some other stuff (almost everything involving The Master sadly), but the real meat should be in part two so I'll see how that goes.

Re: Doctor Who: The End Of Time Part One review
Posted By Omniaural 1 December 26, 2009 11:20:44 AM

I kind of think that they tried too fit too much into this episode. THey wouldhave been better off unpacking a lot of the developments in another episode, replacing the dire Waters of Mars with something altogether more significant. That said at times the episode dragged soooo much! I nearly turned off during the whole 'MasterMania' bit as he transformed everyone into him. There are lots of you! I GET IT! And quit with the laughing!!! Its obviously plaing to the younger kids with whole superhero stuff. THe problem with this doctor now is the same as with Superman. You have to keep throwing more and more ridiculously overpowered enemies at him in order to bring on any sense of real danger. The only good bit was the end, and I don't mean that in a horrible way, but the reveal of the timelords and their possibly imminent return is long overdue. I'm guessing they are going to take over the bodies now transformed by the Master and they will then reset time and the doctor will have all his regenerations back thereby answering fanboy niggles.

Re: Doctor Who: The End Of Time Part One review
Posted By LittleManFromAnotherPlace 1 December 26, 2009 11:22:47 AM

I used to be known as Grrr but couldn't log-in any more under that name any more for some reason(if that's relevant which it isn't really). Anyway didn't think this was bad - just dissapointing. It did a pretty good job of building up to what is obviously intended as some kind of big face-off. Found the Master's reserection was poorly explained - just a bit of voodoo nonsense. I liked Cribbins & Tennants performances. Didn't like Simms hamming it up. The plot was too bogged-down in arc-story complications. I didn't like the way The Doctor's death was signposted. A big deal is being made about the fact he is about to regenerate but its' happened to nine other Doctor's before inc. Tom Baker who was in the role for longer. In the old days The Doctor just got mortally wounded & regenerated - no big fuss which I prefer. Still - the ending was quite dramatic & surprising (if yes - derivative of Matrix Revolutions). Nice nod to Palpatine's senate scene at the end of Revenge of the Sith with that wide shot from behind Timothy Dalton & his Timelord chums. Here's hoping Part 2 will be better.

Re: Doctor Who: The End Of Time Part One review
Posted By gingeryoda 1 December 26, 2009 12:47:08 PM

Personally I loved it.Completely bat shit crazy with a great payoff.Very interested to hear reset mentiond.Could explain the new Doctors age and Tardis.

Re: Doctor Who: The End Of Time Part One review
Posted By willbass86 1 December 26, 2009 01:13:27 PM

I thought it was a vast, vast improvement on the last two specials. The "loads of masters" thing was a bit hammy, fair, but the re-introduction of the Time Lords en masse sent a shiver up my spine. I can't wait to see Dalton flex his muscles and chew some scenery.

Re: Doctor Who: The End Of Time Part One review
Posted By Zardoz 1 December 26, 2009 01:30:09 PM

Agreed , the whole Human Race becoming the Master was just a tad daft and is it only me that thinks Tate is the worst piece of casting since Bonnie Langford ? (without showing my age.) Big up the Cribbins and roll on New Year's Day .

Re: Doctor Who: The End Of Time Part One review
Posted By Danalottah 1 December 26, 2009 01:48:55 PM

I think Catherine Tate has been the best companion yet and John Simm is the best Master/villain. I noticed that in the last scene two of the Time Lords had their faces covered. I'm guessing one of them is the woman who Wilf encountered at the beginnning but am wondering about the identity of the other. Is he/she someone significant or just added in to provide symmetry?

Re: Doctor Who: The End Of Time Part One review
Posted By fowardlook07 1 December 26, 2009 02:31:35 PM

Shameful. This was a mess from beginning to end. The last 3mins was the best part of the episode. Timothy Dalton stole the episode right at the end. Dalton's spit was flying from his mouth, but he delivered the goods. If this is the best Russell T. Davies can deliver for the close of the Tennant era, then God help us!. Russell seems to either deliver a decent start to a 2 parter or he does the reverse of a crap beginning and decent ending. The Master was turned into a cartoon character with superpowers, just ridiculous and rather stupid. Tennant deserves better than this surely. I just hope we REALLY do get a decent send off for the Tenth Doctor era. RTD's time as head writer on Dr Who has been a mixed bag indeed. I just hope that Dr Who that I know and love of old returns with Steven Moffat's 11th Doctor. Darker stories and better plotting with intelligent storytelling.

Re: Doctor Who: The End Of Time Part One review
Posted By explodingzebras 1 December 26, 2009 03:03:58 PM

The companions vary so much, Billie Piper was great (much better than i expected). Catherine tate is so annoying,loud mouthed and dense. It's like what shall we do to appeal to the base-line masses? oh right lets get in some stupid popular comedian with all the intelligence of a packet of peanuts! Freema hardynwillis was n't much better, almost as annoying an dense.

Re: Doctor Who: The End Of Time Part One review
Posted By mokofil 1 December 26, 2009 03:23:35 PM

Awful. Although I'm grateful to RTD for bringing the show back, his continued presence is (for me) ruining the show, and I'm glad he's passing the reins over while there is still a chance to salvage something. I suppose I've still not got over the fact that Dr Who is now a light entertainment show rather than a sci-fi show, trying to pander to the widest audience possible. "Hate" is probably too strong a word for Catherine Tate, but I bracket her with Bonnie Langford - awful, stunt casting. Tennant and Cribbins are excellent, and I like Simm as a very different master to the one I grew up with. The tease with Timothy Dalton and the Timelords was fantastic. But the superpowers - why? The x-ray thing - why? The plot-exposition-cactus-aliens - why? The multiple masters - why? In fact, almost all of the plot - why? The cleanest tramps I've ever seen gushing about Obama saving the world's economy - possibly the worst scene I've seen in any tv show for years. I'll watch the second episode for geek reasons (the Timelords, natch), but this show is on life support and fading fast.

Re: Doctor Who: The End Of Time Part One review
Posted By cordas2 1 December 26, 2009 04:33:18 PM

Tate may have been a bit of stunt casting, but she filled the role admirably and became one of my favourite assistants (even if I still can't stand her comedy). I also have a sneaking feeling that she is going to be very good in the next episode and the Doctor/Donna stuff is going to be pivotal.

Re: Doctor Who: The End Of Time Part One review
Posted By misterjingo 1 December 26, 2009 04:58:16 PM

possibly the worst DH storyline IMO. From the initial "woo woo" reincarnation of the master, with references to books of saxon, potions of life and death. To X-man-esque master leaping around and licking his lips. I was more embarrassed than exhilarated. We were next introduced to a throw away character, his daughter and a gate. It all seemed so poor. They had a destination in mind so disjointedly stumbled towards it, with cut scenes of the master jumping about, shooting energy from his hands, and then licking his lips. If this is the best they can do, perhaps it is time for DH to be stored away for a while again.

Re: Doctor Who: The End Of Time Part One review
Posted By Omniaural 1 December 26, 2009 05:44:21 PM

I think part of the problem is that the episode talks down to people and thinks it can get away with half-arsed sci-fi concepts because its the 'drama' that matters. Not if the drama is as ham-fisted as possible in this episode. I really do hope they pull it together much better. Wilf is a timelord, but humanised like John Smith and DR YANA, and his DNA will allow Donna to survive the relapse.

Re: Doctor Who: The End Of Time Part One review
Posted By xtrmntr 1 December 26, 2009 06:53:13 PM

When the words ‘by Russell T Davies’ appeared on the screen my heart sank. It was the usual mix of ridiculous plot devices, outrageously large-scale plots, rubbish music, lame jokes, gay references, running around and an incoherent and non-existent story. Man why was that guy ever let near a pen?? The whole thing was just awful. Bah humbug! I can’t wait till Steven Moffat takes over.

Re: Doctor Who: The End Of Time Part One review
Posted By taylort 1 December 26, 2009 07:35:43 PM

You totally nailed it when you said: "When you then give The Master superpowers, where he can leap over high buildings and fire bolts from his hands, you disturb the balance and make the fight a little less interesting as a consequence." I'm heartbroken at the way RTD treated the Master in this. They could have come to the same conclusion without making him crazy/a sith lord/spiderman.

Re: Doctor Who: The End Of Time Part One review
Posted By welshleek 1 December 26, 2009 07:54:34 PM

Of course! Cribbins is a Time Lord, but not just any Time Lord!! Wilfred Mott - an anangram of -'The Womble Master'.....

Re: Doctor Who: The End Of Time Part One review
Posted By twinboom 1 December 26, 2009 10:10:07 PM

Nothing worse than looking forward to a nice Xmas present and getting....pants! Maybe RTD will reverse a trend and make the second episode fab, as this time the build up was the dud. Maybe. Master's resurrection daft/character overblown. Grey blanket pointless. Naismith? Nay point laddie! Dalton's spit. Yuk! Point of it all? Erm...??!!? Perhaps the cleaner swept up some bits from the cutting room floor and taped them together into this. Makes more sense than thinking a sentient being chose to edit it the way it was. The next episode will be the last I ever watch. Tennant is six days older than me and it seems sad to watch a much younger doctor. Time to grow up! Can't help feeling that Bernard Cribbins as the Doctor and Derek Jacobi as the Master is what we should be watching. Must be getting old. Time...oh Lord!

Re: Doctor Who: The End Of Time Part One review
Posted By RobReaper 1 December 26, 2009 10:16:42 PM

Was the whole episode rushed? Yes. Was it batshit crazy? Yes. Did I enjoy it? Absolutely. But really, it should have been a three parter, ending where Dalton first appears on screen. This would have given Naismith and the 'blink and you'll miss em' Disciples of Saxon. It might have also given the first part an actual plot. What we got was the Doctor goes somewhere and something happens that won't be fully explained till next week. The Advanced Ood, The Sound of Drums, The Master's ressurectors and ressurection, Naismith, the Green Conkers, the woman who appears to Wilf, Wilf himself and the return of the Doctor/Donna. I'm out of breath just typing this. But like any Christmas special, it's hard not to enjoy it... though looking up I can see I might be alone in that thinking :)

Re: Doctor Who: The End Of Time Part One review
Posted By Dr_Wadd 1 December 27, 2009 01:00:07 AM

What if Wilf isn`t a Time Lord? I`m wondering whether he could actually turn out to be the White Guardian.

Re: Doctor Who: The End Of Time Part One review
Posted By A1nostalgia 1 December 27, 2009 02:27:53 AM

Wilfred Mott is an anagram of Timelord wtf. . . WTF indeed?!!

Re: Doctor Who: The End Of Time Part One review
Posted By A1nostalgia 1 December 27, 2009 02:36:38 AM

But surely anagrams of important Who characters went out with Tremas/Master and (Sir Giles) Estram in the JNT era?. . .

Re: Doctor Who: The End Of Time Part One review
Posted By Anthony1 1 December 27, 2009 09:28:26 AM

Average-some but not enough good points, given all the hype. One hour simply to bring back the master, have him clone himself and show a glimpse of the time lords. Not a lot happened plot wise! I enjoyed JS in fact, he did the best he could with the material but this isn’t really the Master. Master race bit -silly but superficially fun. But why would he do it!? And Naismith's motive was to give his daughter immortality-daft and not credible. There's no excuse for p2 not to be good given the elements in it...But please turn down the music!

Re: Doctor Who: The End Of Time Part One review
Posted By essjayar 1 December 27, 2009 02:04:26 PM

Well, I'm firmly on the side of the OTT argument. But then again, as you say, it's easy to be over critical on a Doctor Who Special - they are after all designed to be family friendly, prime time fun. It's always a balance between pleasing the Who fans who expect Who lore versus the quickfire action and non-taxing plots favoured by a tea time audience! Here's how I feel it will play out: Wilf will shoot the master, since his gun has been shown a few times, including accidently pulling it out in the radiation proof enclosure. The real bad guys are the Timelords, and the Doctor and the Master will team up to defeat them and the Veil of Darkness (which is also probably the Timelords). I wouldn't be surprised if this whole scenario has been manipulated by the Timelords in order to bring them back :-) Of course, in a week, this comment will be proved hopelessly wrong...

Re: Doctor Who: The End Of Time Part One review
Posted By essjayar 1 December 27, 2009 02:20:52 PM

Oh... a couple of other points, since DoG doesn't let us edit comments (or indeed provide proper formatting - incl. blank lines!). To those who are awaiting Moffat and darker, more intelligent stories - beware. Russel Davies brought Who back from the dead and he's managed the balance of crowd pleasing, and Whovian pleasing, stories well. If Moffat appeases the Who crowd then Who won't last another series or two... Secondly, look "forward" to a long regeneration sequence with images and flashbacks of everything from the entire Tennant age - including a special spot for Billie Piper who may or may not return. As for the rest: the cactus people (who are intergalactic salvagers) will take the Immortality Machine, Wilf will die (so he can't be a Timelord - or will he regen?), and the Timelord Massive will be wiped out as time fixes itself - those flying time-correcting things perhaps?

Re: Doctor Who: The End Of Time Part One review
Posted By sweed 1 December 27, 2009 04:03:49 PM

The episode was slightly erratic at times and difficult to follow; there were too many characters with different objectives and motives. However, as a whole the episode was beautiful and there was a real sense of tension throughout as a result of Tennants imminent regeneration. Personally I found the Master to be superb and truely terrifiying, I think his insanity gave the episode an edge and was signifcant in illustrating the chaos and madness that is looming ahead. I hope the second part will tie up all the loose ends and close the chapter on what has been the adventures of a truely great Doctor.

Re: Doctor Who: The End Of Time Part One review
Posted By DamonD 1 December 27, 2009 06:18:13 PM

Only going on what I've read here and about six or seven other Who-releated websites and message forums I visit (plus talking to some real live human beings too)...the general spirit seems to be "Disappointed but I'll see how the second half turns out". I just hope that can be considered a fair opinion to hold, rather than just swept under the carpet in that all-too-convenient "Oh it's the Internet fans, they just complain all the time" excuse.

Re: Doctor Who: The End Of Time Part One review
Posted By cycadia 1 December 28, 2009 08:00:42 AM

For what it's worth, the Master was one of my favourite aspects of this story, which I overall loved. I thought he was beautifully portrayed, with some unexpected subtlety in his confrontation with the Doctor. Not a coincidence that he was talking about when he was a boy - here I could see the inner child coming out in his body language and choice of words to the Doctor. As for DamonD, I think your anecdata's a little off, personally. The LJ comms and Gallifrey Base forums seem to be divided as with any episode, but more positive than not - the latter's ratings thread has in its poll of 3200 people so far, 75% of respondents rating the episode 7/10 or higher (81% for Waters of Mars). I'm looking forward to the AI figures, which are usually slightly higher than the fan ratings. Ah Doctor Who fans. Cringeing is what we do best. Casual viewers just enjoy the silliness and spectacle and story.

Re: Doctor Who: The End Of Time Part One review
Posted By solaco111 1 December 28, 2009 06:42:46 PM

all I will say, is thank god Russel T Davies' tenure is coming to an end, it is episodes like this that put me off the show completely, ridiculously repetetive, predictable and yet silly storylines, the same old enemies and just a general lack of direction... fingers crossed Moffat doesn't make the same mistakes.

Re: Doctor Who: The End Of Time Part One review
Posted By bigal65 1 December 29, 2009 04:43:43 PM

I thought John Simm was quite good as a completely bonkers Master, although yes, his 'superpowers' were a bit naff. The scene in the cafe with Cribbins and Tennant was excellent, with a downcast Doctor's comment of 'dont we all' to Wilfred's mention of Donna 'making do'. I do hope that Billie Piper is bought back for the second part, being a surprisingly good assistant, a lot better than what I thought she would be. The same cannot be said of Tate however, I keep expecting her to come out with 'am I bovverred?' in every scene.......a case of casting to the lowest common denominator perhaps? Please have The Master eat her like the KFC he so evidently enjoys now !

Re: Doctor Who: The End Of Time Part One review
Posted By jodief1 1 December 29, 2009 05:05:17 PM

I'm a fan of RTD and NewWho and still was very disappointed by EOTpt1. Seemed like Auntie Beebs had run out of cash and was trying to pad out the episode with cheap tricks: the Master eating fast, again and again; the cringeworthy resurrection scene, etc. The last quarter hour *almost* redeemed the rest, but not entirely. Even the famous Dr/Wilf scene in the cafe was badly done IMHO: the Doctor we know and love would have asked after Donna before whining about his own death. I understand that this Doctor is under a lot of pressure etc etc etc - but please. If he carries on like this, I'll be glad to see him go, and that's hardly the point of all this buildup, is it? Finally, the Great Spittle Debate: I just thought it was in poor taste, and worse, it made it difficult to enjoy the climactic scene. Just another indication of laziness and poor editing. Here's hoping pt 2 is better (though it's hard to imagine how it could be worse)! First scene seems promising.

Re: Doctor Who: The End Of Time Part One review
Posted By jodief1 1 December 29, 2009 05:09:16 PM

PS If Wilf is anything but a really cool, been-there-and-back human, I'll eat my pants. Now Donna, on the other hand...clearly not human when it counts, at least.

Re: Doctor Who: The End Of Time Part One review
Posted By bigal65 1 December 29, 2009 05:43:56 PM

Re The Great Spittle Debate.....ahhh, could have been lazy editing OR could it be that is the resurrected Time Lords secret weapon? Imagine, billions of Time Lords spitting in unison....Daleks, Cybermen, The Master...all drowned in moments !

Re: Doctor Who: The End Of Time Part One review
Posted By Lucille7777 1 December 29, 2009 10:59:17 PM

I love and miss Martha Jones, Freema Agyeman played her beautifully and she deserves to be remembered and not forgotten in this final. Martha was the best companion, as she is so intelligent, bright, funny and beautiful. Martha’s only failing was falling in love with someone who didn't appreciate her. That's the only fault I consider the Doctor to really have, how he broke Martha's heart. Even though the Doctor was not very nice to Martha, I will miss David Tennant playing the Doctor and I pity Matt Smith having to follow David Tennant in the role.

Re: Doctor Who: The End Of Time Part One review
Posted By Melchior23 1 December 30, 2009 09:38:01 AM

wilfred mott = time wolf RTD (Russell T Davies) = time lord wtf. hmmm... he does like the wolf thing - i suggest the wilf is the doctor's last regen - settled down to live out his days on Earth -And it is he that will die at the end of this story fulfilling the prophesy.

Re: Doctor Who: The End Of Time Part One review
Posted By Danalottah 1 December 30, 2009 02:30:13 PM

That's an interesting thought, Melchior23. But wouldn't Wilf then know that DT's doctor was himself in an earlier incarnation? There has been no indication of this in his attitude as far as I can see. Or are you thinking that Wilf's true identity is encrypted in a fob watch or some other artefact. Could be. Half the fun of Dr Who, to me, is this theorizing between episodes (though I, personally, have never been right yet!)

Re: Doctor Who: The End Of Time Part One review
Posted By jalively1971@charter.net 1 December 30, 2009 06:15:45 PM

Hypothesis: Umm the human race has ended, Donnas DNA will allow for a way back. The leader of the timelords is the Valeyard The Doctors death is not permanent nor does he settle. His destiny was written years ago with Collin Baker (Trial of a Timelord). At some point, he MUST return to Gallifrey, Timelocked or not. Wilf is not likely the Doctor. As said, his destiny is written. However, the Master was once an old man. And according to Time Lord prohecy, the Doctor "Saves" the master. They are Timelords, waiting a lifetime to ensure events play out properly is nothing to them. Jenny is also still out there and still kicking. She could have a role as well. The Master and the Doctor started off as childhood friends. I have a feeling that is how they will end. Star

Re: Doctor Who: The End Of Time Part One review
Posted By Disco 1 December 31, 2009 06:58:31 PM

I really liked the way that the Doctor spoke of regeneration as if he was dying and how unhappy he is about it. Which is the way I feel evey time there is a new Doctor.

Re: Doctor Who: The End Of Time Part One review
Posted By Disco 1 December 31, 2009 07:04:01 PM

At least there was an explanation of how the Master came back. Much better than 'So you escaped from Castrovalva'. I think RTD must have read 'The Completely Useless Encyclopedia' and fought against getting to the stage where the Master would turn up and just say Ta-daaa!

Re: Doctor Who: The End Of Time Part One review
Posted By twinboom 1 January 1, 2010 02:04:00 PM

Just saw it again in a lunchtime repeat. Seems much better than first time round. Maybe too much expectation? Even pants as an Xmas gift turn out to be useful. I think it was intended to be confusing, which it was. Second viewing is less annoying, now you know where it is going. Sure, grey cloak and 'Harry Potter' Master etc. seem a bit too keen to pull in a wide audience, but overall better. A solid six, where before I thought a poor four! Anyway, one thought occurs - the Master as messiah. Second coming, Christmas day, humanity reborn in his image. Is that the role he is unaware of. Must he die to save us? And who else...? Dalton's spit still 'yuk', but left second viewing looking forward to part two. Happy New Year!

Re: Doctor Who: The End Of Time Part One review
Posted By SixtiesChild 1 January 2, 2010 04:45:07 PM

I would have to agree with most of everything that has been said before.That is the problem because Dr Who has been everything from appalling to inspiring and the last two episodes prove this.For example I am no rocket scientist but unless Dr Who is set in an alternative reality,since when did Earth have intergalactic missiles? Also why would a salvage space craft be fitted with what looked like gun positions from a WWII Lancaster,or were they trying to make it look like the Millennium Falcon? Honestly the science was poor and this spoilt what was essential an okay ending.But that has always been the problem and i hope the new team rain back on this aspect and present more credible viewing. Yes when a heavenly body which looks twice the size of Earth moves in next door should we not have been watching a repeat of 2010 and not people wondering where they are going to hide, Lets hope Mr Moffatt sticks to what he is good at,ie Blink and drops the overblown stories of RTD.

Re: Doctor Who: The End Of Time Part One review
Posted By Slev86 1 January 6, 2010 11:55:55 AM

Thank god Russell is leaving before he does anything else stupid. So much wrong with this episode; OTT master, loud, flying, electric shooting, transparent!!, hungry, dressed in a skirt. What happened to the mysterious, clever, crazy but controlled master of disguise. The whole point is he is meant to be the doctors equal!!! Then there's a whole host of stupidity...a burger van in the middle of a wasteland. The doctor being shot at and surviving. The imortality gate that makes me think...why do you have to be a gate? Goodbye Russell, thanks for series 1-3
Post a Comment
Security Code* Get another image
 
 
Doctor Who: The End Of Time
Untitled Document

Follow Den of Geek on

Related Articles

SEARCH

Coke Zero
Advertisement