The Hunger Games: the Mockingjay problem

Feature Sarah Dobbs 6 Jan 2014 - 09:06

The third Hunger Games book might be the hardest to adapt to the screen. Sarah looks at the reasons why...

This article contains spoilers for The Hunger Games: Catching Fire and Mockingjay.

By now, you should’ve had time to see Catching Fire at least twice, had a good cry over it, and compiled a mental list of everything that was different in the film to the book. So let’s start thinking about Mockingjay. Because of the three Hunger Games novels, it seems like that’s the one that’s going to be hardest to adapt to the screen.

For starters, it’s the most controversial book in the trilogy. Although it was fairly well received critically, not all of the fans enjoyed the book’s darker tone. Like the previous two books, Mockingjay is told from Katniss’s POV, but by this stage she’s thoroughly bruised and battered, and spends much of her time finding dark corners to curl up in and hide from the world. She’s suffering from PTSD, and it’s heart-breaking, but it also means not much happens for long stretches of time.

When something does happen, it’s violent and brutal and generally involves the death of at least one beloved character. Then there’s that epilogue, in which Katniss and Peeta fall in love for real, have a family and live… well, not happily ever after, since this is The Hunger Games and both of them are pretty scarred by their experiences, but as happily as could reasonably be expected. Portraying those things on screen, when many fans already hate the fact that they happened, isn’t gonna be universally popular.

But there are other issues, too, especially considering the decisions that have been made in the first two Hunger Games movies. The love triangle, for instance, despite being much trumpeted by the marketing and media coverage of the films, isn’t really that prominent in the actual movies. And despite Jennifer Lawrence’s all-round wonderfulness, some of the subtleties of those relationships has been lost in the movies.

It’s not clear from the films how Katniss really feels about Peeta, for instance; it’s possible to read it all as an act, when in the books she’s confused, unable to sort through her emotions, but definitely feels something for him. And Gale has been pushed so far into the background in the films that the Mockingjay movies are gonna have to work pretty hard to establish, well, everything about him. We got a tiny glimpse of his hot-headedness, his will to fight, and his hatred for the Capitol in Catching Fire, but is that enough to prepare movie audiences for what he’s do in the next movie? I suspect it might feel a bit like it came out of nowhere.

Speaking of coming out of nowhere, District 13 hasn’t really been set up very well in the movies, has it? In Catching Fire the book, Katniss meets two refugees from District 8, Bonnie and Twill, who tell her that they suspect District 13 isn’t the nuclear wasteland the Capitol claims it is, which sets up the exodus from District 12. But the movie didn’t include that scene, and there hasn’t been all that much focus on the district that started the last uprising, so the introduction of District 13 in Mockingjay Part 1 might seem a little out of the blue.

On a more practical level, the CGI creatures in the Hunger Games movies haven’t been brilliant so far (though Catching Fire did a better job of its killer monkeys than The Hunger Games did of the wolf mutts) and the muttations in Mockingjay seem particularly ill-suited to the screen. Human-sized white-skinned lizards that smell of roses? Yikes. There’s a very real danger that they’d just look ridiculous, rather than terrifying, and their perfume probably ought to be dropped completely – it works in the book, when we’re inside Katniss’s head and privy to all her thoughts and sensations, but on film, it seems like a trickier sell.

Then there’s the commercial side of things. Mockingjay has been split into two films, like so many of the final instalments in young adult film franchises. Arguably, Mockingjay deserves it, since there’s so much going on, and there’s even a fairly obvious place to split the story – Mockingjay Part 1 will almost certainly end with the scene where Katniss and Peeta are finally reunited and he tries to strangle her. It’s a killer cliff-hanger, and it changes the whole dynamic of the story.

There’s a lot of story to fit in, and the filmmakers have already said they’re going to be adding in new characters and new plot elements… which is interesting, considering there are so many new characters introduced in Mockingjay anyway. Whether fans will welcome the chance to see a bit more of the world of Panem that Katniss’s POV hid in the novels, or whether they’ll be outraged at any changes to their beloved texts, remains to be seen. (I’m a bit wary, myself.)

And then there’s the demographic issue. Both The Hunger Games and Catching Fire have been rated 12A in the UK (PG-13 in the US), meaning that, considering the subject matter, the filmmakers had to find clever ways to get round the violence of the story. That might actually have made it feel even more shocking, in some cases – hearing Gale’s screams as Katniss runs towards him was harrowing enough, even without seeing the whip connect with his flesh – but Mockingjay has a massive body count. How do you do the scene where children and medics, including Katniss’s sister, are killed by rebel bombs, for instance? It seems likely that it’ll be done using Katniss’s POV, keeping her view obscured and cutting away to avoid any blood spatter, but even so, that’s a pretty nasty scene for a kids’ film.

It’s not like there are just a few gory scenes in Mockingjay that can be worked around; the whole thing is incredibly bleak, permeated with death and despair. (I mean, it opens with Katniss walking through the ashes of her former home and nearly tripping over a skull, it’s not a fun book.) It’s in Mockingjay that we find out what happens to Victors after the Games, too – they are, essentially, forced into prostitution, hired out to anyone in the Capitol who can pay for their services, and if they refuse, their loved ones are murdered. That’s a pretty big deal, and a pretty significant piece of both Finnick and Johanna’s backstory. But it’s not gonna fly in a 12A, is it? It’ll be interesting to see how screenwriter Danny Strong (Buffy’s Jonathan) decides to get round that.

The biggest issue, though, might be the titular Mockingjay. In the books, it’s explained fairly early on that the mockingjay is a symbol of the Capitol’s failure; during the last uprising, the government of Panem had created a genetically modified bird called a jabberjay which could repeat anything it heard. The idea was that the jabberjays (which made a brief appearance in Catching Fire) would eavesdrop on the rebels’ plans and report back to the Capitol, but the rebels soon caught on and started feeding nonsense back to the Capitol.

More embarrassingly, the jabberjays mated with wild mockingbirds, creating a species that can’t repeat words, but can copy songs – the mockingjays that Katniss and Rue used to send signals to one another in the first arena. The mockingjay became a sort of symbol of the Capitol’s failure, which is why it’s important that Katniss wears her mockingjay badge as a symbol of rebellion, and also explains why she, as a figurehead of the revolution, becomes known as the Mockingjay. And it’s also why Cinna got murdered for making Katniss a mockingjay dress.

So much of the Hunger Games story is about symbols and what they represent, with the mockingjay being the most potent symbol of all, but in the movies, that hasn’t really come across. Katniss’s pin has been around since the first movie, and we’ve seen it replicated in graffiti, and in Katniss’s amazing dress, but it hasn’t really been explained, or given much significance. Plutarch’s tell-tale watch, for instance, didn’t make an appearance. To anyone who’d just seen the movies and not read the books, the mockingjay probably doesn’t mean much of anything right now – beyond maybe reminding them of Rue? – and that is gonna be difficult to smooth away in the Mockingjay movies, as District 13 presses Katniss into assuming the mantle of the Mockingjay in their propaganda videos.

Don’t get me wrong, there are plenty of things that will undoubtedly be great in the movie. The first two films have been great adaptations, and with Catching Fire director Francis Lawrence returning for both the final films, there’s no real reason to suspect the ball will be dropped now. And the movies have already set up a couple of things that weren’t in the books, but which will pay off brilliantly in Mockingjay Parts 1 and 2 – we’ve already seen President Snow’s rose garden, for instance, and already been introduced to his granddaughter, which should make that all-important vote at the end of Mockingjay seem particularly dramatic. And the shooting of President Coin is such a wonderfully cinematic sequence that I can’t wait to see it on screen.

I’ll be there on opening night for both movies, no matter what, because I love this story and have faith in these movies to do it justice. All the same, though, I don’t think I’d fancy Danny Strong’s job.

Follow our Twitter feed for faster news and bad jokes right here. And be our Facebook chum here.

Disqus - noscript

SPOILER AHEAD:

I'm intrigued as to how they are going to deal with Finnick's death scene, which in the book was done horribly, with the narrative (whether it was done delibrately or not) hugely disorientating and confusing, loosing the emotion of the moment. But they have done everything else brilliantly so far, so I'm sure they'll pull through!

Interesting article though!

Did you see the Buzzfeed article suggesting various 'improvements' that they make to the final films, two of which included not killing off Finnick and the other key character death? Point - missed.

This is a great article - I agree totally with the concerns about the CGI job on the mutts for this film; it's such a crucial element.
Another key concern of this book is how unlikeable Katniss becomes in it; the problem with the book is that it doesn't really convey the true nature of Katniss' trauma and instead, based on her actions (particularly her confused back and forth between Gale and Peeta) just makes her look incredibly unpleasant as a result. Being given two films should give Jennifer Lawrence adequate time to win our sympathy for the character; even the final few scenes of Catching Fire did more to convey the hurt she's suffered and how it's damanged her than the whole book did.

I really liked the books except for the fact that Katniss is unconscious or asleep for all the main battles in the third so you miss everything because it's from her point of view, I was hoping the films would actually show these as they're not just her POV but now you mention the fact it's a 12A they probably won't, which is disappointing! Still can't wait to see them though :p

More than any other books, this is going to be a nightmare to do justice to in a 12A. I think they will probably have to come up with different, less brutal, deaths for many of the characters. And obviously the children must die off screen.

Either that, or (this won't happen), they should just embrace the 15 certificate and adapt the book properly.

I don't care much about the story. I felt the CGI in Catching Fire was pretty ordinary, and I hated the whole gritty, grainy shaky cam feel. Action scenes were blurry and unclear and violence was sanitized. It was terrible. It was fairly repetitive as well...how many times did we see teenagers running through a forest?

I tried so hard to like the first film. But I just couldn't. I have seen it all before.

It was just a mix of Battle Royale, The Running Man and Rollerball. And I love those films so I just couldn't get past the pure plagiarism from the author.

Before you all shout at me and call me an idiot, please do not. This is merely one opinion from someone. And that is why we are all here, to share opinions.

I am not saying the film is BAD, I just did not enjoy it.

Yeah I can see why it'll be hard especially the lizard things. But Mockingjay isn't my favourite of the series as it felt awfully rushed like Collins had only written the first draft. I hope that they slow it down in the movie adaptations.

That's fair enough, but I think we've heard that criticism enough times now that there's not much point saying it again?

I think Mockingjay is when it really began to show that Collins hadn't originally planed to write a trilogy. Still, hopefully the fact that the Hunger Games film series knew what was coming from the start will help that at least a little.

I think you might be confusing the first two films, because the second film had little (if any) shaky cam, going for a smoother look and feel, and the CGI was a huge improvement on the first one.

CG creatures are not Francis Lawrence's strong suit... (I am Legend). Hopefully the producers make sure it won't be too shabby...

Besides that issue everybody I know who has read the books said the third one is the weakest of the bunch. Almost felt like written by a ghostwriter or in a real hurry. Is that true?

I was of the same opinion also but the second film is an improvement on the first. My problem now is that they seem to be splitting the final book into 2 films? This sort of thing is really annoying. Such a cynical money grab.

I agree. What is wrong with having a nice full bodied Trilogy? A start, a middle, and an end. Done.

Not a start, a middle, a start and an end.

It may make more money for the studio, but it just waters down the content of the film as they have to stretch it out for so much longer.

All i can say to that is, there's no smoke without fire.

I don't know, I really didn't feel that way. Mockingjay was my favourite of all the books; it felt like everything came together properly in it. Catching Fire was the one I thought was the weak link.

If the first film was 12A, then the youngest of the people who watched that may now be getting close to 15, especially by Part 2, so maybe the certificate isn't so much of a problem?

Sponsored Links