Den of Geek

Avatar: Special Edition review

Ryan Lambie


As opposed to, say, the extended cuts of Aliens, Terminator 2 or The Abyss, the new scenes add little of particular note to everything we've already seen

Avatar returns to multiplexes for an extended Special Edition. But does its extra footage warrant a return trip to the cinema? Ryan finds out...

Published on Aug 25, 2010

It's grand, expensive, and currently stands as the highest grossing film of all time. With Avatar, James Cameron proved himself to be the master magician, the David Copperfield of Hollywood, and his 3D fantasy epic is his multi-million dollar conjuring trick. And nine months on from its initial run at the box office, it's back, in a newly extended Special Edition.

Never a particularly concise film to begin with, this new edition of Avatar is nine minutes longer, and puts back a few scenes trimmed from its initial release.

While shoving Avatar back into the globe's multiplexes so soon after its initial showing could be viewed as cynical profiteering, James Cameron's florid fantasy is a film that relies so heavily on its visuals that the cinema is inarguably the only place to see it. Viewing it in 2D, on a television at home with a cat on your lap strips the movie of much of its glittering impact.

And so Pandora returns to the big screen in all its luminous glory. Essentially, a digital playground in which James Cameron plays around with the pet themes familiar from his earlier movies (space marines, heavy artillery, ecological warnings, destruction on a grand scale), the planet is home to the rangy, tree-dwelling Na'vi, whose verdant forest is under threat from a greedy corporation and its high tech army for hire.

In an effort to win the locals' ‘hearts and minds' (one of the film's many heavy-handed references to real-life conflicts), scientists have engineered avatars, creatures identical to the indiginous Na'vi, but that can be controlled remotely by humans lurking in special chambers.

Jake Sully (Sam Worthington) is a crippled ex-soldier who, linked to his Na'vi alternate body, becomes emotionally attached to the residents of Pandora, and finds himself fighting alongside them in a desperate guerrilla war against the invading humans.

You'll know all this, of course, because you'll have seen the film already. If so, Avatar's numerous shortcomings may still linger in your mind. The clod hopping ethnicity of the Na'vi and their toe-curling cod religion, the forgettable script and pulpy, predictable story are all as distracting the second time around.

After an engrossing introductory half hour or so, Cameron spends a lengthy second act swooping his camera across Pandora's tropical paradise, and swooning over Jake's relationship with Neytiri (Zoe Saldana). There are endless scenes of horse riding, flying and hunting, and the newly added sequences, which are almost interchangeable with those already present, make this part of the film even flabbier than it was before.

When the confrontation between human and Na'vi finally arrives, however, it's with a familiar Cameron crunch. His movies may have become soppier in recent years, but he's still an action director at heart, and the climactic battle, where the residents of Pandora swoop upon the armoured might of the humans' military machine, shows some of the verve we perhaps took for granted in Terminator 2 or Aliens.

This darker aspect of the film is helped considerably by Stephen Lang's performance as Colonel Quaritch. While forced to play a fairly stock military villain, he brings considerable heft and vigour to the role and gives every scene he's in a tingle of steely-eyed menace.

But these are all compliments that could be paid to the original cut of the film, which brings us to the central problem with Avatar: Special Edition - the additional footage is largely inconsequential.

The much discussed scene of alien copulation is mere seconds long, and is far less steamy than some were probably hoping. Elsewhere, there's an extra hunting scene, a brief sequence that shows an early retaliation from the Na'vi, prompting Colonel Quaritch's tree-wrecking expedition. Perhaps the most notable new moment occurs close to the end in a mercy killing that adds more melodrama where the end credits should be.

As opposed to, say, the extended cuts of Aliens, Terminator 2 or The Abyss, the new scenes add little of particular note to everything we've already seen. There's nothing here of the magnitude of The Abyss' excised tidal wave, or even the trimmed sentry gun scene of Aliens.

And, unlike those earlier science fiction classics of Cameron's, Avatar has had almost no time to percolate in the collective geek consciousness. By the time Aliens: Special Edition came out many years after its initial release, fans of the film were positively champing at the bit to see it in its new form.

Avatar, on the other hand, is still comparatively fresh in its audiences' minds, and those returning to their local multiplex expecting to see a startling new side to Pandora are almost certain to be disappointed.

Instead, what we've been given is a second chance to see Avatar on the big screen, with the added bonus of a few more minutes of flora and fanciful creatures. And while Cameron's conjuring trick of cutting edge 3D and sumptuous colour may not have quite the shock-and-awe impact it had the first time around, it's an entertaining sideshow nevertheless.

3 stars

See also:
Resident Evil Afterlife 3D impressions (uses Avatar technology)
The directors for and against 3D technology
7 notable old-school 3D effects

 

Tags

Users Comments

Re: Avatar: Special Edition review
Posted By Lachesis 1 August 25, 2010 11:04:08 AM

It was PLENTY long enough already imo and trimming it would have been a far more productive approach.

Re: Avatar: Special Edition review
Posted By TheTeacher 1 August 25, 2010 11:52:16 AM

Three stars? Seriously? Still sounds more like a one star flick to me. Man, I guess, this is still one of the worst films I've seen over the last few years. I agree with Lachesis's comment above: cutting it would have been a major improvement.

Re: Avatar: Special Edition review
Posted By Lansdowne5 1 August 25, 2010 12:21:46 PM

Lol. This film was awful..... Really, total rubbish.

Re: Avatar: Special Edition review
Posted By Utini42 1 August 25, 2010 12:38:59 PM

TheTeacher and Lansdowne5: I didn't much care for it myself but if I really felt it was rubbish or one of the worst* films I'd ever seen, I would have avoided the article or at least by-passed posting a comment. Obviously you two, as well as myself, are in the minority, based on the box office take. I think this is just the studio and Cameron double/triple dipping into the fans pockets. At $20 or more a ticket, to toss the fans a few crumbs... BAH! BUT... nobody is forcing anyone to go see it. *People who throw out the phrase WORST FILM either use that every time they see a movie they feel superior (??) to or simply have not seen very many movies.

Re: Avatar: Special Edition review
Posted By gudge 1 August 25, 2010 12:39:06 PM

JAMES CAMERON EATS BABIES! But in all seriousness, the Avatar bashing is getting old. If you dont like it, well done. I am sure you have made your feelings known on many message boards many times. OBviously, the film is "awful..... Really, total rubbish". The $3billion box office proves that. I am not claiming it at a great film, but it was thoroughly enjoyable and expertly made. Stop jumping on the Avatar-hating bandwagon because you think its edgy and cool to go against the masses. Are the prebookings available on the new Twilight yet?

Re: Avatar: Special Edition review
Posted By capt_1ntens0 1 August 25, 2010 12:41:02 PM

Great to see the oh so predictable knives are out from the comments above over the highest grossing film of all time. It must be an absolute stinker- its worse than a million Jonah Hexes and Batman and Robins right? my god its over $2billion of box office crap isn't it? Fact: no film could make that kind of money if it sucked like people keep saying- Transformers 2 was abysmal and made too much cash but didn't even come close to Avatar's take- the public has spoken people and they saw that it was good! This film is a superb sci fi addition to an already superb director CV. The plot may not be that original but for sheer spectacle (which is all this film was every going to be lets face it) nothing has come close since maybe the Matrix? Independence Day? Its broad strokes film-making and that's how it should be enjoyed, in the same vein as Star Wars- a grand space opera of a movie. I also disagree about the comment about it not being as good at home- it was the first Blu Ray I purchased and on a 40" plasma it looked superb. Not having the distraction of the 3D just made me able to appreciate the level of details the scenes held and absorb in this epic tale of primitive vs hardware even more than in the cinema. Lansdowne5, TheTeacher, Lachesis- you are wrong.

Re: Avatar: Special Edition review
Posted By cordas2 1 August 25, 2010 02:19:40 PM

Sorry but since when does box office take qualify a movie as great or terrible? The argument that Avatar MUST be a great film because it has taken billions at the box office is just a load of gibberish.. all it means is that lots of people went to see it, not that they thought it was brilliant....

Re: Avatar: Special Edition review
Posted By picknmix 1 August 25, 2010 02:49:05 PM

No he's right. It's a paper thin narrative papered over with glossy visuals. And the special edition isn't very special at all. But you obviously liked it, and lots of people turned up to see what the fuss was about.

Re: Avatar: Special Edition review
Posted By DontPanic 1 August 25, 2010 04:17:22 PM

I fail to see how the box office take is a sign that the film was any good. I for one went to see the movie and of course paid for it so I contributed to that box office total but I left the theater throughly disappointed. The film is essentially a rehash of a hundred overused tropes from other movies combined with a threadbare plot which we have seen dozens of times before. If anything the massive amounts of money made by this film should be attributed to the marketing campaign not the merits of the film.

Re: Avatar: Special Edition review
Posted By TheTeacher 1 August 25, 2010 04:36:52 PM

I never judged a film by the money it has made at the box office, which is why my comment definitely was not tied to anything having to do with that at all. And I''d never bash a film just because of that. I watched Avatar myself, because many people were talking about how awesome it would be... I've never been THAT disappointed after watching a film. That's the reason why I absolutely don't like this film. The visuals are simply stolen from any other Final Fantasy (flying continents?!?) and the story was as predictable as every other romcom. So that is that...

Re: Avatar: Special Edition review
Posted By JoRide 1 August 25, 2010 06:01:24 PM

The movie was good. Part of the magic was that it was believable. Did it have an amazingly different or intricate story? No. But it did have a point and it made that point. Does Box office earnings mean a great film? Partially yes. Word of mouth marketing keeps a film being seen. I've heard many people say, I loved it, you gotta see it, and quite frankly, I agreed. But what people seem to ignore is that part of the story is the whole world that was created and placed on the screen. Then there was the understanding of how some of our own cultures connect to nature symbolized by an alien world. Give the film a break!

Re: Avatar: Special Edition review
Posted By benheck 1 August 25, 2010 08:41:45 PM

As a huge Cameron fan, I have never cared for his Special Editions. It makes his already-too-long movies even longer. I think had Avatar been, oh, an hour shorter I would have liked it a lot more.

Re: Avatar: Special Edition review
Posted By Lachesis 1 August 25, 2010 08:44:08 PM

Ironically I don't dislike Avatar but maintain that if the running time is to be altered there is more likely benefit from a reduction rather than an extension - its an expressed opinion and not something that can either be right or wrong. As for box office success compare any list of greatest ever movies and highest grosses and there is notable disparity. In this case in the breadth of a single sentence we have a guy using the figures to arrive at two polar opposite conclusions - Box office success of proves my opinion is fact but box office success of proves nothing...there may be more overt examples of double standards and conceit on the internet but this one has to be well up there.

Re: Avatar: Special Edition review
Posted By aldowatts 1 August 25, 2010 10:01:37 PM

adjusting for inflation "gone with the wind" is and always has been the top grossing film of all time. with 10 academy awards it is also still the best one ever.

Re: Avatar: Special Edition review
Posted By aldowatts 1 August 25, 2010 10:07:42 PM

avatar was/IS "dances with wolves in space" I liked it, but best ever I think not I'm watching it on DVD right now so i obviously will not bash it

Re: Avatar: Special Edition review
Posted By cordas2 1 August 26, 2010 08:18:03 AM

@ aldowatts - and Shawshank Redemption a film that is rated as one of the best movies ever made died a horrible and unloved death at the cinema... It was only on its video release that it started to gain any recognition. Box office take is just a reflection on how many people went to see the movie, nothing more nothing less.... Personally I really enjoyed watching Avatar in 3D, it was a visual feast... a technical marvel of unparalleled beauty, as a cinematic experience it was 1st rate.... but as a movie it pretty dire.... I was repeatedly punching myself in the side of the head to keep my brain from thinking about what was going on, when I left the cinema with the friend I went to see it with we were hugely buzzed about the movie but as soon as we stopped talking about the gimmick 3D and the gimmick SFX we shut up because we didn't want to trash the memory by exploring the plot, the characters or the simple inanity of the story. For a movie to be considered one of the best ever then everything about that movie needs to be at least great... and on 3 of the most important area's Avatar was at best disappointing.

Re: Avatar: Special Edition review
Posted By aldowatts 1 August 26, 2010 09:27:57 AM

@cordas2 you missed my point completely "gone with the wind" is not now, nor has it ever been my favorite movie, but by the 2 most popular measures of movie greatness oscars and box office. it is the all time king of both. I just get tired of new movies being the called the new box office king when they are not even close.personally I'll watch k-pax again before wasting my time on most popular movies i like shawshank and have watched it more than once but I think you are reaching throwing it onto a "best list"it would hardly make my top 10 list. my lists are based on my answer to the question:"would I want to watch that again today"? titles like "august rush","29th street", "once upon a time in America","5th element","dune", "nice dreams""going south", "the color purple" would make that list before "gone" or "shawshank" would. I love movies and despise commercials, so there are not enough new releases to feed my movie habit without running plenty of repeats. I watch more movies in a week than most people watch in a month.

Re: Avatar: Special Edition review
Posted By Naviblue 1 August 26, 2010 10:24:41 AM

The review was fine until you wrote this. "...and those returning to their local multiplex expecting to see a startling new side to Pandora are almost certain to be disappointed." I don't think anyone planning to watch the re-release is expecting to see a new side of Pandora, well maybe except for one misguided Critic. We're expecting to see more of Pandora and the cool and creative stuff that didn't make it in the first cut. Plus, it's always a treat to see Avatar in 3D. Well maybe except for one misguided Critic.

Re: Avatar: Special Edition review
Posted By gudge 1 August 26, 2010 11:33:36 AM

just to throw into the 'Gone With The Wind' article, surely if you want to factor in inflation, shouldnt you try factor in the upon release there were no opportunities to see it other than on the big screen and the fact there was no such thing as the internet, let alone piracy? If Avatar was released back then, it wouldnt have been taken from the theatres for years on end. Anyway, noone has claimed Avatar to be the greatest movie ever, the mass box office is just to exemplify that the arrogant comments about it being one of the worst films ever are in fact in the minority. The same critics of the 'but its a story i have seen before' generally bum Star Wars, even though its a rip off of most westerns - it just happens to be in space.

Re: Avatar: Special Edition review
Posted By chrichtonkicks 1 August 26, 2010 04:07:19 PM

I find it strange the out and out hatred for Avatar; it’s almost as undeserved as the hatred for the Twilight films. When will people be grown up enough, and objective enough, to simply state they didn’t enjoy the film. To make a statement like Avatar is the worst film ever is simply idiotic. On what level is it the worst film? Visually it gets top marks. The acting - while not Oscar material is certainly passable - which is more than you can say for any of the recent Star Wars films. The script, while not original, and perhaps a little flabby, was nevertheless well enough written that it didn’t immediately throw me out of the universe the film had created. So by what measure is it the worst film ever? Is it more likely you were simply were a victim of your own over expectations? Personally – as a massive Star Wars and LOTR fan – I thought Avatar was clichéd, simplistic, and could see where the film was going from the start. I loved it. It doesn’t pretend to be anything it’s not, it knows its Dancers with Wolves in space, but it’s just done so damn well that it couldn’t help appeal to the scifi geek in me.

Re: Avatar: Special Edition review
Posted By tfoltz 1 August 26, 2010 04:38:19 PM

I loved Avatar. As with any large grossing movie, the popular thing to do is to talk about how bad it is after the fact.

Re: Avatar: Special Edition review
Posted By cordas2 1 August 26, 2010 05:16:03 PM

I dunno I think a lot of the scorn it gets is directly proportional to the amount of praise it gets by all the people saying that its a great movie....

Re: Avatar: Special Edition review
Posted By seany 1 August 27, 2010 11:40:02 AM

Highest Grossing Film! 7 Months in Multiplexes Special Edition Cinema Release Simply put Avatar is Tremendous! Im still hurt that it didn't win the Best Picture Academy Award, although i thought Hurt Locker was an excellent movie too. ... and how can anybody compare the new mediocre Transformer movies to Avatar, i mean the 1986 version has much depth in the story line compared to the crap Michael Bay is pumping out...

Re: Avatar: Special Edition review
Posted By nz_flyboy 1 August 28, 2010 04:45:34 AM

Hardly any of these comments have anything to do with the Extended edition. Personally, Avatar rocked! The beautiful Pandora, Eywa- planetary intelligence, Tech gadgets, Love story, and again- James Camerons masterful storytelling. The extended edition features extra CGI scenes which I felt didn't add much to the original, except for a sensational amazing new aerial hunt scene, and I long suspected Jake and Neyteri would join each other Tsaheylu's (bonds) together in the love scene. The final addition wraps up what happened to Tsutey- which I felt was rather corny after that brilliant climactic showdown "you are me last shadow"- arggh- gimme a break! There are also many other small additions which are hardly noticable. Avatar is an amazing achievement. I would love to live on Pandora with the biodiversity and respect for life the Navi have. I wonder how many reviewers who have slammed it did so from within 4 walls of a industrial city landscape. There is still time to wake up before we do completely kill our 'Pandora' Earth.

Re: Avatar: Special Edition review
Posted By ultramonkey 1 September 7, 2010 04:45:16 PM

You hit it on the nail nz_flyboy; one of the main appeals of the movie imo is the connection to nature and also the fact that everything(flora, fauna, invertibrate, vertibrate) is inter-connected. Peeps who get that love the movie because it one of few movies that show that deep respect for the world around us. For others, its just another 3d movie with an overused plot.
Post a Comment
Security Code* Get another image
 
 
Avatar Special Edition

Avatar: Special Edition

Untitled Document

Follow Den of Geek on

Related Articles

SEARCH

Coke Zero
Advertisement