Den of Geek

Twilight: New Moon review

Carley Tauchert


Carley's been to see Twilight: New Moon and rushed back to her keyboard to give us all the details...

Published on Nov 17, 2009


Its official, Twilight fever has taken over the world. At the moment you cannot walk anywhere in London without being reminded that the second of Stephenie Meyer's hugely popular book series is about to be released in the cinema. Having been a fan of the books, I (and what feels like most of the rest of the world) was waiting for New Moon to finally be released, and the good news it really is a rather good movie.

Keeping with the timeline of the first movie in the saga Twilight, New Moon picks up a few months on from where we last left high school student Bella (Kristen Stewart) and her vampire boyfriend Edward (Robert Pattinson). Everything seems to be going blissfully well, until an accident at her 18th birthday party forces Edward to leave the town of Forks, and Bella, forever.

Sent into a deep depression by his leaving, Bella slowly begins to come out of her shell again thanks to friend Jacob (Taylor Lautner), but things soon become complicated when he has a secret of his own.

Discovering that when she puts herself in danger she can see Edward again, Bella begins to become more reckless and an attempt at cliff diving starts a chain of events that concludes with a face to face encounter with the most feared of all vampires, The Volturi.

Following on almost effortlessly from its predecessor, New Moon is a bigger, bolder and, ultimately, a better movie than Twilight. With the storyline and characters in place, you jump straight into the action and feel like you have just carried on where you left off. Not many sequels can do this as naturally as what has been done here and kudos go to the filmmakers.

My one real gripe with Twilight was that it felt like a Catherine Hardwicke movie and not a Twilight movie and this has more than been rectified in New Moon with the style fitting the genre. It makes the movie itself run a lot smoother than the first.

The success of the first movie has also allowed a bigger budget for the second and that can be seen almost immediately on screen. Gone is the rather amateur attempt of making the vampire's skin sparkle and in its place is a much more natural authentic attempt of what, essentially, is making somebody look like they are covered in a diamond-like finish rather than being dunked in glitter.

Although it still does look slightly strange, it did not create hoots of laughter from the audience, which the original did. The biggest effects, however, are saved for the werewolves and this actually was the biggest disappointment I had. Although you can see on screen the time and effort put into their creation, there are times when your entire focus is on the fact they look so computer-generated. It takes you slightly out of the story.

Director Chris Weitz and writer Melissa Rosenberg have managed to do something that not many are truly successful at here though, and that is taking a book and bringing it to life without editing or watering down the source material. Even if that does mean cutting the screen time of teen heartthrob Robert Pattinson, a brave move as he really has become the face of the franchise more than any other.

It seems a shame really that this writer and director duo will be split up for the next movie (director David Slade will be helming the next instalment) but maybe a different take is what will breathe new life into the franchise. Time will only tell.

Reprising their roles from the first instalment though, Stewart and Pattinson slip back into Bella and Edward as if they have never been away or, in fact, become huge superstars between the films.

There will, however, be a firm line drawn between Team Edward and Team Jacob for the remainder of the films and that is down to Taylor Lautner who has really made the character of Jacob come to life both physically and emotionally. There has been plenty of press about the hard work he put into buffing himself up to keep this role and I really don't think if they had replaced him they could have found anybody better.

Flying the flag for the British actors involved is Michael Sheen as Aro, one of the heads of The Volturi and he's charmingly chilling in a very friendly British way. But just under the surface lies a darker creature that is waiting to be let loose, but never fully will be. Next to him in the creepy stakes is everybody's favourite child actor, Dakota Fanning, who plays evil vampire Jane with a straight face and rather menacing façade.

If I had to have a real grip, I wish there had been more time spent with the Quileute Tribe of wolves, as in the book you really got a sense of who they were, whereas here it was all very much glossed over, something that I hope will be rectified with the remaining films.

No matter what is said though, New Moon will do well at the box office thanks to the masses of Twi-hard fans out there. Thankfully, though, the filmmakers have not rested on their laurels and have made a film that will not only entertain the fans but the wider audience.

I can almost hear the countdown to Eclipse starting now.

4 stars

 

Tags

Users Comments

Re: Twilight: New Moon review
Posted By cress 1 November 18, 2009 05:51:16 PM

I can't wait to NOT see this! I am just as excited about NOT seeing this as I was about NOT seeing the last one. These films came out years ago, and it was called UNDERWORLD. And it had balls. Twilght is Underworld/Saved by the Bell/GAP all in one. It looks like a Nickelodeon live-action film somehow made its way to the big screen.

Re: Twilight: New Moon review
Posted By AshleyAnne 1 November 18, 2009 10:43:33 PM

Glad to hear the second film is an improvement from the first. I'm not a twilight fan, but you can't deny the popularity and appeal of vampires right now. http://www.newsy.com/videos/what_s_this_vampire_craze_all_about

Re: Twilight: New Moon review
Posted By nicolette 1 November 19, 2009 10:32:28 AM

HEHE CAN THIS MOVIE COME OUT ALREADY PLZ!!!!! WE HAVE TO WAIT TILL THE 27/11/2009 TO SEE THIS MOVIE IT SUCKS!!! I READ ALL THE BOOKS AND WOULD LOVE TO SEE ALL THE FILMS NOW 2+3+4

Re: Twilight: New Moon review
Posted By blindfold11 1 November 19, 2009 11:10:20 AM

Saw the preview footage at Empire and it got the audience laughing when jacob whips off his shirt to dab the rather poor looking blood off the girls forehead. If the male nudity is going to get this gratuitous then i can't see how people can take it seriously. But then it isn't a film amied either at my tatstes I have to admit. But great film making ti does not make for. But I have a team J and E at work sat behind me and they are all excited about this wekeend. :-)Enjoy the popcorn folks.

Re: Twilight: New Moon review
Posted By clementine 1 November 20, 2009 12:00:57 PM

underworld is nothing like twilight ..... and it had about as much balls as monopoly it f£$%ing sucked (excuse the pun)i have to admit though the cgi looks a bit erm cartooney

Re: Twilight: New Moon review
Posted By jdiuuu 1 November 21, 2009 01:09:01 PM

i saw the movie last night,in London. What can I say? Although we bought premiere tickets, we end up behind Team Jacob, lots of 12-year old girls who were screaming and almost having orgasms in any second of the film where Jacob appeared. I barely heard something,the movie was good,better than twilight BUT too much make-up,Edward looked like he had red lipstick on all the time,Esme and Rosalie looked like two completely different people than in Twilight,too much make-up I must say.Too much blood from a paper-cut,the actor that plays Alice is HORRIBLE,ruined the film in my opinion. I felt that Kirsten connected better with Taylor,rather than Robert,maybe this is because off their life's off screen as well. I thought Jacob looked very well,exactly like in the book,and I expected to laugh when he tried to look tough, but i didn't. The werewolves..Loved them when they were still,although the eyes were too animated,but they looked like game characters when they were moving. The fighting scene between the wolves was great, if you ignore the fact that they look so computer generated. Bella connected with Charlie very well,the guys from school are great as always, Mike is an awesome actor. LOOOOVED the cliff diving scene,absolutely perfect. GREAT movie anyway :D

Re: Twilight: New Moon review
Posted By twilightnewmoonsucks 1 November 21, 2009 10:55:52 PM

this is an utter disappointment. nothing actually happens in this film it is so boring. let me outline the move. edwards leaves bella. bella goes crazy. becomes friends with steriods kid. blaa blaa blaa. don't go see this. it is so much worse than the first one. any one who thinks this is a good film obviously is special needs and hasn't seen a proper film before. This film deserves 0 out of 10. story line is rubbish however the acting is okay. but still overall an utter disapointment which made me wanna cry because it was so bad.

Re: Twilight: New Moon review
Posted By twilightnewmoonsucks 1 November 21, 2009 10:57:51 PM

sup me again just a note to the douce jdiuuu get ur facts rite douche bag

Re: Twilight: New Moon review
Posted By PurplePandora 1 November 23, 2009 09:06:27 PM

It was much better than the first movie and I believe if anyone find it boring they do not understand the whole drama about heartbreak and how depression can take over you, after all that is the biggest part of the movie. I went to see it and I almost laughed my ass of at the end when everyone gasped and started swearing because well.. the ending was sort of a cliffhanger and they probably didn't read the books. Hopefully more action in the next movie even though I liked the romance I want more action. (:
Post a Comment
Security Code* Get another image
 
 
Twilight: New Moon

Twilight: New Moon

Untitled Document

Follow Den of Geek on

Related Articles

SEARCH

Coke Zero
Advertisement