Den of Geek

Doctor Who series 5 episode 9 review: Cold Blood

Simon Brew


Here's our spoiler-y take of Doctor Who: Cold Blood, the episode that might just turn out to be the most talked about of the series...

Published on May 29, 2010


PLEASE NOTE: THIS REVIEW CONTAINS SPOILERS. OUR SPOILER-FREE REVIEW IS HERE.

Let’s do this the wrong way round, because if you’re anything like us, the part of Cold Blood that you’ll be wanting to talk about all happened in the last five or ten minutes.

Up until this point, we’d been treated to an entertaining, involving conclusion to an old-style Doctor Who two-parter. But from the moment the crack appeared again in the wall, and the Doctor actually looked like he was going to bother to explain it, we shot straight back up in our seats.

It’s a good job we did, too. As the Doctor reached into the crack, we couldn’t help thinking we were on the verge of a Utopia moment, where an episode was about to be turned on its head by something happening in its final moments. As it turned out, for once we were absolutely on the money.

Never mind for now what the Doctor pulled out of said crack (we’ll come to that shortly), how about instead the fact that Doctor Who did what it’s been reluctant to do ever since it returned: kill off a major character?

Granted, Rory is hardly assistant rank in the Tardis, but he’s not far off. And when you consider how dramatically Russell T Davies pulled back from even giving one of the assorted characters a scratch in Journey’s End after threatening to bump at least one of them off, then this is radical stuff for Doctor Who.

Because this is, after all, a Saturday teatime show. And yet, for the first time since Adric decided he was going to try and stop a spaceship crashing, a companion character who had travelled with the Doctor for several episodes was killed on his watch. Now granted, it wasn’t the most convincing way to go (there was a bit of a Die Hard ending about Restac crawling through rubble and firing off a shot), but nonetheless, Rory was shot, and Rory went down. Furthermore, the light coming through the crack got him, which most of us, we’d wager, suspect is the way that Rory will come back to life.

Truthfully, we’d be shocked if he didn’t. There’s presumably a reset switch in there somewhere, tied in to the fact that Amy has already forgotten him (and how good a plot device now does having the two of them waving across the valley look?) just as she’s forgotten the likes of the Daleks. But for now, that’s a genuinely shocking conclusion.

And yet, Cold Blood wasn’t finished. Because what’s that the Doctor has in his hand? A piece of the Tardis. That’s going to all come to fruition, no doubt, in the four weeks ahead, yet in truth, we were still in shock at Rory’s death by this point. Nonetheless, Doctor Who still squeezed in another little mystery with the Tardis segment moment before the credits were allowed to roll, and we'll be speculating about what that means for weeks to come.

All on a Saturday teatime.

The episode that had preceded it to this point all of a sudden felt like a different story, albeit still an enjoyable one. It carried on the themes from the previous episode, that of being an old-school-feel Doctor Who adventure. That meant you got corridors to run along (albeit very nicely dressed corridors), moments of perils that are interrupted with seconds to spare, and a race who aren’t as two-dimensional as they first appear.

The Silurians, as we noted last week, haven’t always drawn the longest bit of the straw where Doctor Who is concerned, but they had fine treatment here.

Turns out that they’re as divided and conflicted as the humans they’ve been sharing the planet with, and on each side there’s someone you could call an enemy.

What was surprising was just how far Ambrose was allowed to go in the script, fulfilling the prophecy that one of the humans would kill the Silurian prisoner (making it two genuinely surprising deaths in one episode).

That they did, instantly damaging any hope of brokering the peace deal that Amy, Sildane the Silurian leader and Meera Syal’s Nasreen had sat down to work out (with the Doctor urging them to be the best they could be). There was, to be fair, quite a lot of talking over action in Cold Blood, we should note, but that’s a good thing in this case.

And it led the Doctor to ultimately put the talks on hold, declaring neither side ready for another 1000 years. In short, 1000 years to save the planet. The subtext isn’t too tricky to see here. What was nice, though, was that Nasreen got a really solid end point in the story, and we wonder if she’ll be around when the Silurians are next explored by Doctor Who at some point in the future. It's certainly left something in the tank for the next time we meet them.

With quality mask and creature work that actually allowed the Silurians to emote and the actors underneath to do their stuff, we’re pleased with how well the return of the creatures turned out. These aren’t old style roaring Doctor Who monsters, instead having a backstory that allows them to be woven into more contemporary stories with just a little more depth to them. Writer Chris Chibnall did this well, too.

But still, it’s the ending that’s going to be talked about the most. And perhaps fairly, because until the rug was pulled from under our feet, we were puzzled as to why this was the second two-parter of the series, when the natural home for it appeared to be earlier in the run.

As it turned out, it’s set things up for a fascinating next adventure, the Richard Curtis-scripted Vincent And The Doctor. Taken as a standalone episode, that already had the potential to be intriguing. But given the story threads it now has to weave in – it can’t ignore them, after all – it’s a flat-out must see…

Our review of last week's episode, The Hungry Earth, is here...

Check out the new and ever growing Doctor Who page at DoG, where we are marshalling all the Who content at the site, including interviews, DVD and episode reviews, lists, opinions and articles on our favourite time traveller...

 

Tags

Users Comments

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 9 review: Cold Blood
Posted By Doenutty 1 May 29, 2010 06:53:51 PM

Poor Rory! Must be coming back somehow though with all the emphasis on the crack and time being rewritten. I'm intrigued as to where this'll lead. Not shocked about the Tardis being the cause of the problem, all the characters who have alluded to it so far have been sure to say ' the Doctor in his Tardis doesn't know' rather than just 'the Doctor doesn't know'. Still, definitely unexpected death on a good episode which looked like it was reaching its conclusion with all the parts sewn up. Wonder what the end solution will be......!

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 9 review: Cold Blood
Posted By Jfw1london 1 May 29, 2010 06:54:55 PM

six letters to sum up how I feel: OMG WTF

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 9 review: Cold Blood
Posted By 04BennettCH 1 May 29, 2010 06:55:42 PM

geuine gasp escaped me when the tardis piece was revealed, awesome!

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 9 review: Cold Blood
Posted By TomBeasley 1 May 29, 2010 06:55:56 PM

Moffat has balls for killing off a companion. Fair play to him and to Chibnall for writing it. Just as I was reflecting on how much better it was than last week, that curveball got thrown in. Wow.

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 9 review: Cold Blood
Posted By Noddle 1 May 29, 2010 06:56:12 PM

Oh boy oh boy. The Pandorica will open (still say ol' Pandora from Greece'll have something to do with that) Silence will fall (er... no, not got much clue what that means if I'm honest), and apparently the TARDIS will be blown to smithereens. This is going to be interesting. As far as the episode goes, I actually put it on mute and/or flipped over to 4 for The Two Towers at some points, which is a first for the series for me, although that's mainly because Dyslexic kid's (wish they'd made more of that) mum was really getting on my nerves. Not a bad episode otherwise.

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 9 review: Cold Blood
Posted By Keeilley 1 May 29, 2010 06:57:56 PM

Well, predictable episode, really, and absolutely agree the last few minutes were the best. But, after last week with the stuff with the engagement ring I expected something to come of that. On a different note, for me the young Amy is a very good actress. I feel that Karen Wotsit is really, really letting the prog down.

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 9 review: Cold Blood
Posted By Noddle 1 May 29, 2010 06:59:58 PM

Gillan. And from the way they shot the last few interior TARDIS shots, that's still very much involved in Amy's arc (I'd put a tenner on the Doc using it to get Amy to remember Rory).

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 9 review: Cold Blood
Posted By shelsfc 1 May 29, 2010 07:02:24 PM

I'll be gutted if they don't bring Rory back, there is so much more to do with him!! Though I suppose...it's Amy who is the companion, and that's the only way she'd stay on the Tardis without Rory now. Still holding out hope he'll come back though. Yeah, that last bit with the Tardis fragment was a bit of an 'holy crap!' moment. And a good one! :D

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 9 review: Cold Blood
Posted By Noddle 1 May 29, 2010 07:03:55 PM

One small, really teeny tiny quibble: WTF is the name of these things below Earth? 'Cause I heard them be called pretty much anything BUT Silurians for the whole ep!

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 9 review: Cold Blood
Posted By procrastinationathon 1 May 29, 2010 07:04:01 PM

D: that was not a happy lead into a night of eurovision cheese.

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 9 review: Cold Blood
Posted By Abomination 1 May 29, 2010 07:05:18 PM

Liked the episode better than Part 1, but am still not too fond of the overall story- it felt like they had crammed about 80% of the plot in Cold Blood and the opening 20% in The Hungry Earth. Fair enough, I can't expecta perfect 50:50 divide, but I found Cold Blood struggling to breathe a bit..... more so than Flesh and Stone when it concluded The Time of Angels. That said, I can understand and appreciate what other people see in the two-parter- a charming, smaller-scale affair with the best of both Old and 'Nu' Who. As for Rory, I'll finish this sentence with a word that could possibly be seen as a spoiler, so you may want to stop reading now, or now just to make sure, it won't make much sense but- Romans. All in all, Amy's Choice and Vampires of Venice remain my favourites of the series, and I also like The Eleventh Hour. I feel that Victory of the Daleks was also quite good, but that the Angel two parter was slightly overrated. That's my two pence, and I look forward to the final 4 episodes. :)

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 9 review: Cold Blood
Posted By Noddle 1 May 29, 2010 07:07:22 PM

Yes, I've heard Rory be associated with Romans before (no, not Venice, before anyone asks, proper Centurian Romans), which does open a few extra doors...

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 9 review: Cold Blood
Posted By alexwlchan 1 May 29, 2010 07:12:42 PM

@Noddle 1: what they're called is a bit of a mystery. The name Silurians was given to them by humans in their first appearance in DW because they came from the Silurian period. They've also been called Eocenes, based on a time period, but neither of these are strictly in line with accuracy. But call it wibbly-wobbly timey-wimey or something. The name the Doctor seems to use is Homo Reptilia, which kinda makes sense, even if I don't like it. On the episode, I enjoyed it a lot. Predictable in places - Ambrose's killing of Alaya was obvious, as was Rory's death, and even the TARDIS piece reveal; if not from the plot, by simply guessing how the series might go. Despite that, still a thrilling episode, and lots of questions for next week. Will definitely keep me going through A-Levels! If I have a criticism, it's that the crack didn't look as good as it has in the past. The set where it fitted looked too plastic-y (is that even a word?). But otherwise, cracking episode.

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 9 review: Cold Blood
Posted By jreiter 1 May 29, 2010 07:13:02 PM

wait, but the doctor pointed out that it was future rory and amy waving at them in the beginning of hungry earth when they emerged from the tardis, right? although he looked a little...put off...maybe it was amy & the other guy, the 'handsome one', and he knew rory's fate? or else rory is not long for the dead...

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 9 review: Cold Blood
Posted By Tlotoxl 1 May 29, 2010 07:15:46 PM

WOW. they pulled one hell of a one-two-three combo to the temples at the end there, the crack then Rory then the Tardis piece - the explosion right at the beginning of the season all makes sense now, the half dazed doctor at the beginning of the series piloting a damaged TARDIS is in someway creating all the problems with the crack IMHO. I do think that we haven't seen the end of Rory though...

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 9 review: Cold Blood
Posted By amylouise7@msn.com 1 May 29, 2010 07:29:17 PM

I don't know what everyone's saying about predictability, I was totally shocked at Doctor Who killing off a series regular - I mean that's Whedon territory!!

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 9 review: Cold Blood
Posted By Noddle 1 May 29, 2010 07:39:20 PM

Time can be rewritten - like the Doctor said, as long as it's not fixed like Waters of Mars or Pompeii, anything can happen. As for Rory, hats off to the writers/producers/everyone on the team, like amy says - that kind of move hasn't been seen since Tara (or possibly 24 series 5, although given that they brought back Tony it kind of takes the edge off).

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 9 review: Cold Blood
Posted By Noddle 1 May 29, 2010 07:40:52 PM

And thanks alex -n classic who isn't my forte. Bit too much a case of "yes, there's a Dalek going to come through that wall with the suspiciously Dalek shaped outline in it later" for me. Takes the fun out of it.

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 9 review: Cold Blood
Posted By Lachesis 1 May 29, 2010 07:56:09 PM

Fascinating episode with a lot to think on, but despite the quality and given the overwhelming list of failures involved I have to confess I struggled to enjoy it. Oh well onward and upward, I hope it resolves with something a bit smarter than a time reset however.

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 9 review: Cold Blood
Posted By Noddle 1 May 29, 2010 08:00:32 PM

Moffatt's not Davies. He doesn't do deux ex machinas and annoying resets. I've heard rumours that the TARDIS may be a source of the cracks from way back before Eleventh Hour aired (maybe even before End of Time was out), or at least that there's something in the TARDIS that's causing all the trouble, and that would appear to be the case here from what I've seen, especially as the Doctor himself has no clue what anyone's talking about. For once.

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 9 review: Cold Blood
Posted By emilymadcat 1 May 29, 2010 08:55:07 PM

As much as I loved RTD I do feel Moffat has challenged people a lot more - and is perhaps veering to a Whovian style serial-arc more than RTD did? I feel like there are little mini-stories threaded together into a whole series, though maybe that's just me? Even so, I really enjoyed the two-parter, though my mum sat whinging in the background that it wasn't David Tennant.

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 9 review: Cold Blood
Posted By Noddle 1 May 29, 2010 09:43:13 PM

If he is, and I agree, he is (or at least, he's adressing things a darn sight more quickly than RTD ever did), it's a bold move - serial arcs are more American than British, we just don't uusually have the time with our shows - 6, 8 and 13 episodes just isn't long enough usually. Hope it continues like this though.

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 9 review: Cold Blood
Posted By MarvMarble 1 May 29, 2010 09:59:11 PM

Great episode. I wasn't keen on the Doctor sticking his hand into a crack which GOBBLES PEOPLE FROM EXISTENCE, but the reveal of the shrapnel was great if contradictory, I.e. should there even be anything to reveal considering the properties of the crack? Then again maybe the Tardis's time travelling radiation thingumy protects it.) And please DoG, bring back the ability to create paragraph breaks!

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 9 review: Cold Blood
Posted By MarvMarble 1 May 29, 2010 10:00:25 PM

Oh and I'm wondering if the Tardis's stiff lock was a bit of foreshadowing considering that 'through the keyhole' shot of last episode...

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 9 review: Cold Blood
Posted By Noddle 1 May 29, 2010 10:05:14 PM

one thing I've just thought of: If Rory was ensnared by the crack and thus couldn't be brought back to the TARDIS, surely the Doc shoving his bloody hand into the sodding thing should've meant he got gobbled up?!

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 9 review: Cold Blood
Posted By thefifthdoctor 1 May 29, 2010 10:16:02 PM

Can't say I'm that fussed any more with "DW" as it's now called. It's too dumbed down & too kiddy oriented. As soon as I heard Moffat say his version was aimed squarely at kids I knew it was going to end badly. This series is all about merchandising & Amy Pond saying "it looks like the crack in my wall" everytime she sees (gasp!) the crack from her wall. I expect many will disagree, citing racial motifs etc from this two parter, but it's been bare bones stuff all the way. Want proof? Go check out the Pertwee arc.

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 9 review: Cold Blood
Posted By emmapants 1 May 30, 2010 12:15:02 AM

@thefifthdoctor I'm sorry, have you WATCHED the new show? Merchandising? Kiddy oriented? Are you kidding? Seriously. And for the record, the Pertwee stuff was made of awesome win and so was this episode. I loved the old school feel and a little bit of everything screamed Pertwee (Silurians, the drill, rural Wales). But man, oh man, was that ending killer (pun unintended). Poor Rory, he was REALLY growing on me. He was like a Mickey Smith she was actually in love with (and I love the fact that's where the comparisons between Amy and Rose end). But Rory was funny and useful and I hope this works out for the best somehow.

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 9 review: Cold Blood
Posted By Roade101 1 May 30, 2010 01:20:49 AM

I must say I loved this episode. Its a shame Rory's gone because I'd just started to like him, he'd really found his feet. But i must say, it came as a complete shock, as did the Tardis piece. Though it is debateable why the doctor wasn't erased from time. Looking back on it, it does seem very predictable but whilst watching it, not so. Fair play to Steven Moffat and all the episodes he's done have been better than the others IMHO. Love Matt Smith and Karen Gillan is officially my heroine of forever. Once again she excelled in Cold Blood when she lost Rory. LOVE LOVE LOVE doctor who. Cannot wait for the finale.

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 9 review: Cold Blood
Posted By winnie 1 May 30, 2010 02:08:31 AM

SPOILER ALERT REGARDING RORY: (other than what happened in the actual episode) Rory is coming back. I don't know in what form. If just as a memory or actually being brought back but according to imdb.com, the actor playing rory is in another episode titled 'the big bang' airing at the end of june.

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 9 review: Cold Blood
Posted By Morbius 1 May 30, 2010 02:32:51 AM

A disappointing conclusion to what started to look like an intelligent two parter. I'm struggling to maintain my interest this season. Oh, well. The visuals were nice, anyway. Great SFX makeup and set design.

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 9 review: Cold Blood
Posted By gakirin 1 May 30, 2010 04:13:32 AM

Better writing would have been to motivate RORY to kill the lizard woman, then have him throw himself before the Doctor in an attempt to redeem himself.

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 9 review: Cold Blood
Posted By thefifthdoctor 1 May 30, 2010 08:00:58 AM

@emmapants Yep, I've been watching...since 1982 actually, when my dad plonked me down in front of the tv for the PD years (hence my username!). Don't get me wrong, Matt Smith has proven all the doubters wrong (myself included), but the material isn't backing up his talent. There's no need to force feed us information every week, and Karen Gillan is almost reaching Bonnie Langford levels. There, I said it! New ipod skittle Daleks scream merchandising, as does the new "DW" logo (clearly for kids). I've been a fan for 28 years, I WANT to love this series, but it's moving strongly from "family" to "kids" & that's wrong. The early timeslots were evidence of that, if the content wasn't. RTD made many, many mistakes, but making it a 100% kids show was never one of them. They have SJA for that. I really hope the continuation of the story arc proves me wrong though. I just won't look at the series through rose (pun intended) tinted glasses. (not implying you do either, but there's plenty of them out there!)

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 9 review: Cold Blood
Posted By thefifthdoctor 1 May 30, 2010 08:04:03 AM

@emmapants Yep, I've been watching...since 1982 actually, when my dad plonked me down in front of the tv for the PD years (hence my username!). Don't get me wrong, Matt Smith has proven all the doubters wrong (myself included), but the material isn't backing up his talent. There's no need to force feed us information every week, and Karen Gillan is almost reaching Bonnie Langford levels. There, I said it! New ipod skittle Daleks scream merchandising, as does the new "DW" logo (clearly for kids). I've been a fan for 28 years, I WANT to love this series, but it's moving strongly from "family" to "kids" & that's wrong. The early timeslots were evidence of that, if the content wasn't. RTD made many, many mistakes, but making it a 100% kids show was never one of them. They have SJA for that. I really hope the continuation of the story arc proves me wrong though. I just won't look at the series through rose (pun intended) tinted glasses. (not implying you do either, but there's plenty of them out there!)

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 9 review: Cold Blood
Posted By thefifthdoctor 1 May 30, 2010 08:05:10 AM

Apologies for the double post, it appears the site is acting up.

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 9 review: Cold Blood
Posted By Viridis 1 May 30, 2010 08:36:58 AM

After last week's fantastic buildup, I was a bit let down by this episode. The episode was fine until Eldane arrived and the episode's tension dropped dead and would've been re-energized if they hadn't copped out of killing Ambrose. She should've been punished, but at the end the Doctor had a point. Instead of an awesome civil war, or war against Earth, we get war against a bunch of people in a room, in a scene that was very poorly directed and then the Doctor and Eldane come up with a deus ex machina to destroy the drill and fumigate the place. I was actually thinking about the crack before the episode aired, hoping that it wouldn't be used again to sort out the Silurians, but there it was, announcing the final tipping point that made the episode officially bad. First the Doctor sticks his hand in there, but then there's light coming out? Why wasn't he erased in the first place? Then Retna appears in a scene similar to the awful CyberKing climbing the ladder in 'Age of Steel' appearing just in the right moment for Rory to make his heroic sacrifice. But if they wanted to kill him off, why didn't they have him fall into the crack to begin with? It's like they really wanted him dead! More questions: why was Eliott stored in storage bay 19? Were there more kids stored down there? Why were the graves robbed? Why did Tony mutate and not die? Why was the voice-over of Eldane shoehorned in at the end? I thought there was actually going to be some action, some real change, some real loss, but there was none, except Rory and he wasn't the Doctor's favourite companion anyway. I was hoping the Doctor would have to choose between the lives of Amy and Rory or peace and harmony between humans and Silurians. How would Eldane even know Rory was lost if he is erased from time? This episode could've been so great, and dark: when the Doctor said to the Silurian scientist he loved him I was disgusted; he was the guy that was about to dissect Amy! There was a confrontation we missed there!

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 9 review: Cold Blood
Posted By Viridis 1 May 30, 2010 08:40:52 AM

And it looks like the TARDIS will be the source of the explosion creating the cracks in the final episode on the date of Amy's wedding. But will the wedding go through now Rory's gone, or will she marry that other guy, Jeff? Or the Doctor? I have a feeling we haven't seen the last of Rory yet. Time can be rewritten!

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 9 review: Cold Blood
Posted By scarimor 1 May 30, 2010 09:17:01 AM

So, is the TARDIS just caught in the explosion, or its source? *ponders contentedly*

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 9 review: Cold Blood
Posted By MarvMarble 1 May 30, 2010 09:31:26 AM

" I was actually thinking about the crack before the episode aired, hoping that it wouldn't be used again to sort out the Silurians, but there it was, announcing the final tipping point that made the episode officially bad." Indeed it appeared. But it didn't sort out the Silurians (although, considering how it acted in the Angels episode I wonder why it didn't. The Doctor didn't close the crack this time...) As for the Doctor and the Silurian official's resolution, I don't think that quite qualifies as a deus ex machina. They're in a control room. In a city of an advanced civilisation. Surrounded by technology. Not really too much of a stretch.

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 9 review: Cold Blood
Posted By MarvMarble 1 May 30, 2010 09:35:07 AM

No offence but I think the term 'deus ex machina' is used to often nowadays. I'd actually argue the crack in the Angels episode (which seems to be pretty much loved) was closer to a DeM than what we got in this episode. Even that mmight not quite qualify, since the cracks in time were established throughout the series right from the start, but that to turn up right when and where it was needed against an indestructible foe... that was awfully convenient wasn't it?

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 9 review: Cold Blood
Posted By utr@raglan.net.nz 1 May 30, 2010 10:54:30 AM

So if the piece of the Tardis is shrapnel from the Tardis blowing up then that makes it the 2nd time this season that the Doctor blew up the Tardis (first being Amy's Choice). I don't have a clue what that could mean but I love the way that Steven Moffat is messing with my head.

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 9 review: Cold Blood
Posted By the_hat 1 May 30, 2010 11:31:48 AM

I really enjoyed it! Actually, i'm really enjoying everything i'm seeing from the new series (well, almost). I'm by no means a big Who geek, but am a fan of a well made bit of Sci-Fi TV. Matt Smith's Doctor, with his capacity for making mistakes, has an actual CHARACTER, unlike David Tennant's annoying "HO YES!" take. Tennant's Doctor was too assured in his genius. There was a sense of jeopardy when Smith stuck his arm into the crack that wouldn't have been there with the last Doctor. And the Pandorica? Hmm... Pandora's box? Hmm... A POLICE box? Hmmmm.......

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 9 review: Cold Blood
Posted By Zozzy 1 May 30, 2010 12:39:21 PM

Surely the crack would be gobbling up all the reptilians unless the Doctor closes it?

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 9 review: Cold Blood
Posted By antonio7865 1 May 30, 2010 01:02:37 PM

I think we will all find by the end of Episode 13, the last episode of the series, in fact Matt Smith is blown up with the Big Bang and he will regenerate back in to Doctor 10. Everything in this series being wiped out by the crack in time...

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 9 review: Cold Blood
Posted By stuxmusic 1 May 30, 2010 01:07:04 PM

This episode was brilliant. Almost certainly the best of the current series. Matt Smith finally seems entirely at home, and my brain has fully accepted him as the doctor. And I've jelled with the companions without even knowing. I even got a little watery at the end, and whimpered out 'Rory?' with a shocked look on my face. It was an utter belter. I just hope the crack doesn't swallow up the Slurians and that they and the excellent, companion-worthy Nasreen Choudhly (played wonderfully by Meera Syal) come back again.

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 9 review: Cold Blood
Posted By sicubitt 1 May 30, 2010 01:29:44 PM

I don't understand how in the space of a few scenes the dastardly reptilian Doctor who was just about to dissect Amy whilst she was conscious, becomes all warm and fatherly towards the "apes", even waving comically at the revived Eliot whom he had put into cold storage because they don't dissect the young.

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 9 review: Cold Blood
Posted By sicubitt 1 May 30, 2010 01:46:59 PM

** Not spoilers but predictions** Two things about the end of this episode. We know that Steve Moffat is planning to go back through the established events at the end of this season and change some things (The Tardis comes back to Amy as she sits on her suitcase in her garden as a little girl -- The Doctor comes back to her in the Byzantium and asks her to start trusting him -- but he's wearing his jacket and the doctor in that episode has lost his jacket to the Angels etc) As Rory lies there shot, The Doctor "Sonics" him -- and he suddenly looks around and says "I don't understand. We were on that hill" as if he had suddenly been transported to this scene. Just a thought. Also, as Amy gets into the Tardis at the very end she says' "You boys and your locksmithery." She remembers "my boys". Finally, there has been more than one Police Box shaped Tardis in Doctor Who. Anyone remember when the Master Materialised his Tardis around the Doctor's at the end of Tom Baker, start of Peter Davison era?

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 9 review: Cold Blood
Posted By emmapants 1 May 30, 2010 04:01:27 PM

@thefifthdoctor I just don't see the "kiddie" overtones. Especially coming from Moffat, who has, in my opinion, always delivered the scariest episodes. The Empty Child STILL creeps me out something hardcore. And really as a whole feel to the show, maturity-wise, I don't see that it's changed. Most greatly evidenced, in fact, by the end of this episode and the very serious death of Rory. And more importantly, Amy's forgetting of him, which is not necessarily a concept that kids are going to understand. Why it makes it so much worse, that is. Maybe it's something about living in America and away from most of the publicity of the show, but I've never seen it as a "kid's show". And Power Ranger Daleks aside, I still think that's true. No the new logo isn't my favourite either, but it is more of a throwback to old logos, and I think you're reading too much into it. The DW is just so they could fit it into the shape of the TARDIS cause someone thought that'd be cool. No one's actually calling it that. (Are they??) As for Karen Gillan and Amy is just going to be a matter of opinion, and I haven't watched any Mel episodes, so I can't comment there. And yes, too true about the "rose-coloured glasses", it's part of what made Martha such a problem child.

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 9 review: Cold Blood
Posted By Viridis 1 May 30, 2010 08:15:21 PM

@MarvMarble Maybe I did use the term 'deus ex machina' a little bit premature. It was more of a handy plot device that ended the storyline and threat suspiciously easy, allowing the author to end the story within the allowed 43 minutes. This episode could've been awesome but it failed to live up to its potential in many ways. This could've been 'The Sontaram Strategem/Poison Sky' with the Doctor as an Arbiter of Peace negotiating the terms of a new world between warring factions, but instead all this was only hinted at and wrapped up with Eldane's handy voice-overs, so unless we get to see the Silurians again quite soon it was just a handy cop out. And I'm displeased over the return of the crack, as I would've rather seen a good standalone two-parter instead of this tagged-on scene, reducing the tension and pacing (not to mention erasing Rory, he was a great companion!) that alludes ominously to a future episode. I liked that he put his arm in there. I somehow already had a mental image of that in my head, and then he actually did it! But the episode would have been better off if the crack had killed off Rory to begin with. Why have him shot in that awful scene? I hate it when villains do that. This was a bad episode; It could've been so much better.

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 9 review: Cold Blood
Posted By FonceFalooda 1 May 30, 2010 08:23:44 PM

Yeah, kiddie show or not, this episode flipped my girlfriend OUT. Two major deaths, and two huge reactions to them (Amy AND that Silurian's sister making that noise!). I don't know how anyone can complain anymore that the Moff's turned it into the "TimeTubbies". ----- And yes, I wondered why the Dr could reach in and come back out, and what the weird light tendrils were, and what happens to it once he takes off, but I'm just gonna assume it'll all be explained at some point. Or not. Always (and I mean 'Since Pertwee' always) had to suspend my disbelief a little more with Who, but that's just part of the fun. :)

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 9 review: Cold Blood
Posted By DamonD 1 May 30, 2010 08:30:18 PM

I just can't take Rory's death serious and be shocked by it. I just feel they'll bring him back RTD style and take away any drama from him being dead. If I'm wrong I'll hold my hands up, but call me a cynical ol' bugger - I'll be expecting Rory right as rain by the end of episode 13.

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 9 review: Cold Blood
Posted By drayab 1 May 30, 2010 09:18:31 PM

One thing I'm wondering about, it's probably something to bring Rorry back, is the ring box. In the last 5 minutes it was to visible not to be important.

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 9 review: Cold Blood
Posted By cheechwiz 1 May 30, 2010 09:59:47 PM

Thank God, no more Rory. The guy was a wet end and brought nothing into the series, except to be well-deserved cannon fodder. But having said that, the end wouldn't have been half so poignant had he not existed. But, let sleeping dogs lie, here's hoping that they _don't_ bring him back.

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 9 review: Cold Blood
Posted By A1nostalgia 1 May 30, 2010 11:20:33 PM

So IMDB says Arthur Darvill appears as Rory in ep 13... Reminds me of Matthew Waterhouse getting credited in Time Flight but he just had a cameo as a ghost. Doctor Who was the second most watched BBC1 show (after Eurovision) with 5.7 million (Overnight estimate)which is up over a million on last week but the share is down with some viewers who may have missed last week watching ITV1 instead... Roll on Van Gogh! ;o)

So how the hell did the Doctor put his hand in the crack?
Posted By moorish 1 May 30, 2010 11:23:40 PM

Rory lies feet away from the light and it eats him, he never existed. The Doctor reaches *right into it* and... nothing. Not even a hint of an explanation for this. I love the Moff, but there have been some shocking oversights in the plotting of this series. If RTD had tried this on in one of his seasons the haters would've gone mental. And Cheech - Rory *will* be back. Count on it. Probably would've been more shocking if they hadn't already "killed" him a couple of weeks ago. COME ON, Moffat.

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 9 review: Cold Blood
Posted By QuattroFormaggi 1 May 31, 2010 12:47:50 AM

The Silurians have more than a passing similarity, both Appearance and Demeanor, to Babylon 5's Minbari race. These like the Silurians have a Warrior Caste and a Religious Caste (Albiet Scientific with regards to the Silurians).

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 9 review: Cold Blood
Posted By Geordie2004 1 May 31, 2010 01:06:21 PM

Much better episode than the last one. Chandry's character wasn't as annoying, the premise of it was enjoyable, especially with their choice of narrator. Rory's death was a big moment, and a massive twist for my money. It will be interesting to see whether he gets brought back or not.

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 9 review: Cold Blood
Posted By QuattroFormaggi 1 May 31, 2010 07:03:34 PM

@phil@grotto... I agree. It is silly childrens tv at the mo. I thought kids had thier own 'safe' spin off called Sarah Jane Adventures.. why branch this (U) rated drivel over to saturday nights? Too many over the top comedy moments and poor acting so far (bar Karen Gillan) Bring it back upto a standard of likes seen in "Impossible Planet/The Satan Pit,Dalek, Bad Wolf/Parting of Ways/Blink"+more not seen anything like these standard yet. Please lets see something better from this 11th doctor.

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 9 review: Cold Blood
Posted By RichyH 1 May 31, 2010 07:42:53 PM

Having disliked almost all of this series so far due to terrible plots and some cheap looking CGI, I actually found myself liking the concluding second part of this story more than I expected to. I think the lead actors are terrific, and I also have a feeling that somehow Rory will be back. I didn't like the new Silurian look; too human. They needed the third eye on the forehead and a bit of a different 'voice' to make them seem less human. I did find the scientist character who was an evil dissector in part 1 and a friendly almost comic character in part 2. I got the impression that a lot of stuff was cut from the story overall - no idea if/when we'll get to learn what was chopped but presumably it was all for running time reasons?

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 9 review: Cold Blood
Posted By milliemorten 1 May 31, 2010 11:02:17 PM

Phil@grotto and others. If we defend Who it's not cos we are sycophants it's cos we disagree. Personally I think u are all way off. This has been intelligent exciting clever fun. Yes Amy can grate but overall I love this clever season

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 9 review: Cold Blood
Posted By whitemere 1 June 1, 2010 01:51:52 AM

@ phil@grotto.. Wow someone likes their own voice. I tried to read the entire screed but tuned out around 'squeaky bums' being mentioned. No doubt if I wasn't so busy being sycophantic and partisan and fawning etc I'd have had the energy to plough on til the end.

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 9 review: Cold Blood
Posted By smolemon 1 June 1, 2010 10:44:37 AM

after the first part of this two parter - I wasnt looking forward to this episode at all. However, it was great. Well done to the writers for creating smart monsters for once! In fact, the humans turned out to be the mosters all along. Its episodes like this that make the show suitable for more than children. ..and the end.. well, Its the first time in this series that ive sat up in my chair and gasped! Has the TARDIS blown up a some point in time then? how can this be avoided I wonder! hurry up Saturday - we are waiting!!!

HOW DID HE NOT GET EATEN BY THE CRACK?!?
Posted By moorish 1 June 1, 2010 11:16:40 AM

I can't believe everyone is just glossing over this massive problem. The Doctor stuck his hand into the crack!! People are obviosuly willing to overlook anything for the Moff - RTD would've been *crucified* for that one. Smith is no Davey T, either.

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 9 review: Cold Blood
Posted By kerravon 1 June 1, 2010 12:12:28 PM

THE DOCTOR IS A TIMELORD!!!!!.Of course he can reach in there it wont affect him as it does others.

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 9 review: Cold Blood
Posted By Growler 1 June 1, 2010 02:22:43 PM

Yeah Whitemere, first time post...had lots to say. Shame no para breaks. It's not my voice I'm interested in...it's the show. Removed it now as it's more of an article than a post. Shame you don't like reading.

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 9 review: Cold Blood
Posted By Growler 1 June 1, 2010 02:28:46 PM

Well, Milliemorton, I don't see these posts as defending anything coz nobody is doing any challenging. Just saying how great everything is, and biting the heads of anyone who disagrees (not saying you have btw), isn't what a forum is about.

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 9 review: Cold Blood
Posted By explodingzebras 1 June 1, 2010 04:01:50 PM

If Rory was erased from history that would mean he would not have been able to save Amy in Vampires In Venice, and the episode Amy's Choice wouldn't have happened as she would have no choice!

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 9 review: Cold Blood
Posted By xtrmntr 1 June 2, 2010 08:11:26 AM

Wait a minute... Why were the lizard people taking people from their graves? Was this ever explained? And how come Amuy couldn't remember Rory, but she could remember the guys in the angels episode who had been eaten by the crack?? Was this ever explained?

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 9 review: Cold Blood
Posted By Shilling 1 June 2, 2010 11:57:29 AM

explodingzebras: one of the rules of time travel in Dr Who is 2whatever happens stays happened", changing the past only has very general domino effects, and hardly effects time travellers at all. xtrmntr: Amy remembered the soldiers because she is a time traveller and is was from a different time to them. However she is from the same time as Rory and so found it much harder to remember him. Yes this was all said in the show, just very quickly. They never did explain the graverobbing though. In general terms I thought the episode was good, with some very sophisticated messages (two sides with equal claim and good intentions can still end up at war; and parental protective urges can sometimes lead to great acts of evil). What I didn't like was more badly researched babble in the Silurian background (so the moon came into alignment around the time that apes walked the Earth, seeing as the Silurians hunted them...? TV writers are incredibly shit as research especially when it comes to geological time periods and events. Inexcusable in a show about time travel).

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 9 review: Cold Blood
Posted By Rob_H 1 June 2, 2010 09:14:45 PM

Loving all the "I have just about given up on this series of Doctor Who" posts. No prizes for guessing where you'll be next Saturday night. This was, for me, the peak of the series thus far.

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 9 review: Cold Blood
Posted By ubabz@hotmail.com 1 June 3, 2010 12:46:58 AM

@xtrmntr your quite right. didnt cross my mind until u jut mentioned it. Even in the angel episodes, everyone remembered them. they should have been forgotten. and they were being taken from their graves for...? Moffat doesnt explain things at all. I'l wait untill the series end and if their no answers...what's his Mofat's number?

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 9 review: Cold Blood
Posted By junegrape 1 June 20, 2010 02:45:01 AM

What can I say... meh, meh, meh. For all the reasons already listed by those who were also underwhelmed. And I'm sorry... the character of Amy Pond... grating to the nth degree. Maybe it's a generational thing. Episode after episode with clunky writing... or is it clunky direction? I don't know. But, meh.
Post a Comment
Security Code* Get another image
 
 
Doctor Who series 5: Cold Blood

Doctor Who series 5: Cold Blood

Untitled Document

Follow Den of Geek on

Related Articles

SEARCH

Coke Zero
Advertisement