Den of Geek

Doctor Who: The Waters Of Mars review

Simon Brew


It’s so well done here that you can’t help but scan the Radio Times to see if, by some miracle, the next episode is on tomorrow

A Doctor Who special that really delivers, we review the beginning of the end for David Tennant's Doctor in The Waters Of Mars...

Published on Nov 15, 2009


PLEASE NOTE: IF YOU'VE NOT SEEN THE EPISODE, THIS IS A SPOILER-FILLED REVIEW

I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: Doctor Who will miss Russell T Davies.

The Waters Of Mars very much saw the show turning down a much darker path, and for long parts is perhaps best described as one of the Doctor-less episodes, yet with the Doctor slap bang in the middle of it.

Russell T Davies has probed at this before, at how the Doctor leaves behind a line of casualties in his wake, and how his very arrival at the scene of something means calamity is never far away. But here his script – co-written with Phil Ford - attacks the central character of the Doctor in perhaps the most potent way: he renders him utterly, utterly helpless.

Sure, he’s uttering words, and sure, he’s running around corridors. But ultimately, there’s a genuine feeling pumping through much of Waters Of Mars that for the first time in a long time, there’s nothing that the Doctor can do.

But all of this shouldn’t come as a surprise. Davies’ best episodes – with the exception of the superb Midnight - have invariably come when he’s writing on the home strait to a big finale. The Stolen Earth, Utopia and Bad Wolf were all strong to varying degrees, and while the pay off has never convincingly matched the build up (with, perhaps, the exception of The Parting Of The Ways), Davies damn sure knows how to tantalise and build-up an audience.

With The Waters Of Mars, he does it again, although that’s not how initially it seems things are going to pan out. Particularly in the early part of the episode, it seemed a jamboree of classic horror and monster movies rather than anything particularly dark. It can’t just be me who had visions of The Thing in their head when it was revealed that everyone could already be infected by the water that was causing the creation of some not particularly friendly monsters.

The use of water, to be fair, was an inspired plot device, even if it did ultimately seem a bit of a distraction from the main work of the episode. When Doctor Who taps into simple, everyday things it’s usually at its most unnerving, and when the Doctor warned here that water is patient, it managed it again. Ironically, of course, it was the single drop that was the most dramatically effective, rather than the hosepipe dribble coming out of the monsters’ mouths.

The characters themselves, most of whom proved to be water-cannon fodder, at first came across as the usual demographically-diverse collection of faces. The first human off-world colonists in history, we meet them working on Bowie Base One (see what they did there?), clearly isolated and clearly unlikely to make it to the end of the episode. Step forward the superb Lindsay Duncan though, who is just brilliant as Adelaide Brookes, the leader of the team on Mars.

Whenever the focus switches away from the ensemble and more onto her, The Waters Of Mars immediately feels the benefit. Her speech to Tennant at the end, about how he’s wrong, is brilliantly delivered. It’s in line with the best moments of the episode, and the script wisely slows things down an awful lot for long periods of time to let moments like that resonate.

Take too the part where Tennant is telling her about her fate, and the understated reaction on Duncan’s face. When he drops out the word “consolation” to her, it has real resonance and impact.

Duncan’s performance is matched though by Tennant’s, in arguably his best ever performance in the show. For those who’ve complained about the wild-eyed, hyperactive Tennant of earlier episodes, this is the perfect riposte.

The scene near the end when he’s walking away, hearing the radio chatter of the doomed inhabitants of Bowie Base One, demonstrates simply superb acting. For large chunks of this episode, the Doctor is a very still and haunted man (spitting out lines you never thought you’d ever hear the Doctor say), and Tennant for me absolutely nailed it. Take too the moment where he’s trying to convince himself that he’s effectively the boss of time, and his decision to go against its laws by affecting a fixed point: he utterly owns the role, and it’s really going to miss him.

Memo to Matt Smith: you’ve got one hell of a job on your hands.

Furthermore, this was a Doctor Who episode with consequences. Adelaide’s presence on Mars was a direct result of the events of The Stolen Earth, where a Dalek stared her straight in the eye and then left her alone (we’ll come back to that in a minute). The Ice Warriors may have contributed to the events on Mars in the first place. And then there’s the consequences to come, with the summons from the Ood at the end, with Tennant’s Doctor realising – even if he’s running from it – that his time is nearly up.

It’s so well done here that you can’t help but scan the Radio Times to see if, by some miracle, the next episode is on tomorrow. There’s no immediacy to the cliffhanger, rather a festering feeling of impending doom. It works all the better for it, too.

Picky time, though. There was still room for a little comedy in an otherwise very dark story, the best of which was Tennant’s aside about he hates robot animals, albeit with the exception of dogs. But less successful was Gadget, who looked like an in-bred version of Johnny Five from Short Circuit, particularly when filmed from the side.

I also wasn’t hugely keen on the monster side of things this time, although my feeling is that’s more down to the fact that the emotional battering the Doctor was taking was by far the most involving part of the show. The creatures were perfectly serviceable, but – as with Planet Of The Dead – they were more the sideshow here than the main thrust of the episode.

Also, I can’t help thinking there’s a logic gap in there somewhere. If the destruction of the Mars base is a fixed point in time, and if Adelaide’s presence there was a result of the events of The Stolen Earth, then how could the Dalek we see have known that?

That might be me misreading things, but the Daleks would have needed the events of The Stolen Earth to play out and for decades to pass before knowing how vital Adelaide was to time. Surely, therefore, the Dalek there and then should have just shot her, as it wouldn’t have known of her importance? There’s no doubt some clever time-travelling answer to that, but it did jar a little for me.

Those slight grumbles aside, though, I thought The Waters Of Mars was terrific. We saw in Torchwood: Children Of Earth that Russell T Davies can write stone cold hard drama to a very high standard, and this is surely as far as he’s yet pushed Doctor Who in that direction.

The Doctor, as presented here, is a lonely man, without a human companion to act as a counter balance, and he starts going off the rails fairly swiftly as a result. That’s not the Doctor that we’ve seen on the side of lunchboxes and on school rucksacks for the last few years, and the really intriguing thing is that, surely, further darkness lies ahead.

On the basis of The Waters Of Mars, Christmas – and The End Of Time – simply can’t come quickly enough. For it can’t just be us whose geekbumps soared off the scale when the trailer for the final specials kicked in at the end.

The Doctor vs the Master with some assistance one way or the other from The Ood? We know what we’ll be doing on Christmas Day…

See also:

We'll be rounding up some of your reactions to The Waters Of Mars, so please leave your thoughts in the comments below!

 

Tags

Users Comments

Re: Doctor Who: The Waters Of Mars review
Posted By mark-reed 1 November 15, 2009 08:07:32 PM

Now THAT is what I want to see Dctor Who being like ALL the time - brilliant, intelligent, and thoughtful.

Re: Doctor Who: The Waters Of Mars review
Posted By varoh 1 November 15, 2009 08:09:57 PM

The final half of that show was pretty much the best I've ever seen Doctor Who be. A complete tour de force from all involved

Re: Doctor Who: The Waters Of Mars review
Posted By moakle 1 November 15, 2009 08:17:00 PM

I'm by no means a massive Who fan but that was quite simply one of the finest episodes of any series I've seen this year. Tennant was brilliant and that final twenty minutes or so was electrifying. Great, considered review by the way Simon.

Re: Doctor Who: The Waters Of Mars review
Posted By 1tango13 1 November 15, 2009 08:18:05 PM

Was that Brian Cox on the voiceover for the trailer? I hope so.

Re: Doctor Who: The Waters Of Mars review
Posted By 04BennettCH 1 November 15, 2009 08:18:50 PM

I agree it was a fantastic episode, one of my favs. I think the other side of the doctor we saw was (i.e. a bit psycho) was brilliant.

Re: Doctor Who: The Waters Of Mars review
Posted By mrs_saxon 1 November 15, 2009 08:19:08 PM

A very dark episode, I loved it. what got me most excited though was the clip of the next ep - John Simm is back as the Master! My all-time favourite incarnation of The Doctor's arch-enemy! I can't wait!

Re: Doctor Who: The Waters Of Mars review
Posted By roncook 1 November 15, 2009 08:21:51 PM

Good stuff, the sort of thing we have come to expect. Shame that DT is leaving, he really has come to make the Doctor his own. Most interesting thing for me was that this could have been, without too much rewriting, something other than a DW script. Now whether that is a good or bad thing, I am not sure. On the downside, these cannon fodder episodes can be a little depressing, but on the whole the sort of thing we have come to expect...shame we had to wait so long!

Re: Doctor Who: The Waters Of Mars review
Posted By mark-reed 1 November 15, 2009 08:26:19 PM

...and exactly the kind of thing I've been wanting to see from Dr W all this time.

Re: Doctor Who: The Waters Of Mars review
Posted By Dutchface 1 November 15, 2009 08:41:08 PM

So... how long till christmas? :D

Re: Doctor Who: The Waters Of Mars review
Posted By 04BennettCH 1 November 15, 2009 08:44:00 PM

By the way, were you actually writing this review as you watched the episode? How could you have possibly published it the moment the episode ended without doing so? Unless you got advanced screening.

Re: Doctor Who: The Waters Of Mars review
Posted By Jetterz1231 1 November 15, 2009 08:44:47 PM

When the Doctor started losing his grip on his sanity, almost, I was on the edge of my seat. David Tennant has proven time and time again that he is worthy of taking up the mantle that the previous incarnations have left him. Bravo to the Doctor Who team; what a brilliant episode!

Re: Doctor Who: The Waters Of Mars review
Posted By fooki 1 November 15, 2009 09:09:53 PM

I can't believe all this laudatory stuff about the Waters of Mars. I thought it was one of the most dumbed-down Dr episodes in the new series, with lumbering cod philosophical questions, pedestrian pace, an excess of pointless noise and babble, laboured dilemmas... we had to struggle through an hour of D-movie scriptwriting for a crisis point in the end ten minutes? Jeez, I could have done something useful like washed my hair.

Re: Doctor Who: The Waters Of Mars review
Posted By smithy80 1 November 15, 2009 09:20:56 PM

What an amazing episode, total agreement with Jetterz - edge of the seat stuff towards the end. My only gripe is - didn't Gadget go through the water and into the Tardis, therfore transporting it back to Earth? Or did I watch it wrong? There was a lot going on... On the whole though, excellent TV. Bring on Christmas!!!

Re: Doctor Who: The Waters Of Mars review
Posted By geordieracer 1 November 15, 2009 09:36:55 PM

Totally agree with Jetterz. In my opinion this is one of the best episodes of DT's reign. Not just because it was well written, well cast, and well acted but also because it just leads us in to his demise, and that is an amazingly exciting, and completely upsetting, though. Our lives will all be infiltrated by a large void when DT goes as this episode just reinforced what a brilliant Dr he is. Hats off to RTD and Phil Ford. Well worth paying over £100 for a TV license for!

Re: Doctor Who: The Waters Of Mars review
Posted By DamonD 1 November 15, 2009 11:12:33 PM

A good base under siege story, strengthened by one of Tennant's best performances and a very brave move in making the Doctor look quite so hardline at the end. The Doctor seems to have 'seen the light' already about his bout of meglomania, but the damage has already been done. It's not so much nothing he can do...more like nothing he SHOULD do.

Re: Doctor Who: The Waters Of Mars review
Posted By paulychilds 1 November 15, 2009 11:29:53 PM

Very good episode. A couple of things though... Re: the Dalek. Like the doctor, Daleks are time travellers and they 'just know' what are and aren't fixed points in time. Second - the doctor changed a fixed point in time by saving Adelaide. This happened in season one's Father's Day when Rose saved Pete Tyler - and the result was the Reapers. How come no repaers this time?

Re: Doctor Who: The Waters Of Mars review
Posted By cptjackharkness 1 November 15, 2009 11:51:25 PM

i enjoyed it what a fun time now give me the good stuff i want to see ROSE and Captain Jack it was a great day Christmas cant come soon enough

Re: Doctor Who: The Waters Of Mars review
Posted By smithy80 1 November 16, 2009 12:32:29 AM

Not that bothered about Rose to be honest (although we all know it's gunna happen) How many times can she be shut off in a parallel/alternate universe/world/reality/whatever FOREVER with no possible chance of returning and still come back?!!! None-the-less, can't wait to see how The Master is re-introduced and Xmas day can't come soon enough.

Re: Doctor Who: The Waters Of Mars review
Posted By stuxmusic 1 November 16, 2009 12:58:12 AM

To be honest, I was terrified. Not of the monsters, of the doctor. It's really the most terrifying he's been in this and this was all I'd known of Tennant before his Doctor stint as he did a itv drama and was a serial killer or something, and he scared the living shit out of me. That's the first time he's done it in doctor who, and damn, it was amazingly effective. That being said, I do wish we had some more fun times with Tennant, rather than just a pure black hole of terror to come.

Re: Doctor Who: The Waters Of Mars review
Posted By PersonMan1988 1 November 16, 2009 05:55:19 AM

If John Simm can match David's performance from this episode (which I'm very confident he will) then we'll be in for one hell of a finale. I know it's been stated one too many times, but Christmas truly cannot get here fast enough.

Re: Doctor Who: The Waters Of Mars review
Posted By lesmond 1 November 16, 2009 08:07:53 AM

This was one of the best Dr Who episodes I've ever seen. My only minor gripe is that as in all of Russell T Davies scripts there is always a lot of running about, but thats just me. I'm looking forward to the return of the Master, and will be looking out for some more evil welding (watch him - he's loving it) as done when he turned the Tardis into the paradox machine. John Simm can do no wrong in this role.

Re: Doctor Who: The Waters Of Mars review
Posted By cordas 1 November 16, 2009 10:45:27 AM

Hmmm... I thought it was ok/good but I wouldn't give it much more than that. Certainly its the best Dr Who special, but compared to some of the earlier Dr Who stories (Mommy, Satan Pit, The Tate episode to name but a few) it was more than a bit threadbare. Tenant was great at the bits where he got to put some emotion into the role (the tortured Dr was really good), but at other times it really seemed like he was just going through the motions. Lindsay Duncan was the same, when she was directly dealing with the Dr she was fantastic but as soon as she started to deal with her crew she might have been reading off auto cue.

Re: Doctor Who: The Waters Of Mars review
Posted By Codgin 1 November 16, 2009 11:39:19 AM

The last thirty minutes for me blew me off my feet, amazing stuff, the Who is forgiven for its rather weak Easter special. The door is blown open for the Doctor now, if he can change this fixed point, whats stopping the Doctor jumping into the Time-War? Saving Rose/stopping Doomsday? Can't wait till Christmas!!

Re: Doctor Who: The Waters Of Mars review
Posted By Codgin 1 November 16, 2009 11:39:21 AM

The last thirty minutes for me blew me off my feet, amazing stuff, the Who is forgiven for its rather weak Easter special. The door is blown open for the Doctor now, if he can change this fixed point, whats stopping the Doctor jumping into the Time-War? Saving Rose/stopping Doomsday? Can't wait till Christmas!!

Re: Doctor Who: The Waters Of Mars review
Posted By stegy 1 November 16, 2009 04:29:40 PM

I... didn't really like the ending i dunno, although bad, it seemed better to me when he was walking away while the shit was hitting the fan, seemed emotional, when he went off the rails it was a bit "eh.."

Re: Doctor Who: The Waters Of Mars review
Posted By Anthony1 1 November 16, 2009 09:02:32 PM

Glad most people enjoyed it but I found it a bit average-the underlying story was run of the mill (and done so many times before) and the threat from the monsters was not allowed to be frightening enough. Most fans love the Doctor as god again subplot but McCoy did all that years ago. The impact was also lessened by all the pre publicity telling us how dark it was etc. On the plus side it was certainly far better than Planet of the Dead!

Re: Doctor Who: The Waters Of Mars review
Posted By Omniaural 1 November 16, 2009 10:29:01 PM

I think this is definitely opening the door for the Doctor to go back and try and change some key moments in the past. And he will succeed in bring back Gallifrey but suffer a death because of it. Most likely as a punishment. I;m sure the Master is also going to try and bring back the timelords and undo the results of the time war.

Re: Doctor Who: The Waters Of Mars review
Posted By fowardlook07 1 November 16, 2009 11:19:20 PM

Quality Dr. Who. Good set design, stunning photography as always in new Dr. Who, nice acting and Graeme harper's direction was strong and assured. Planet of The Dead, Voyage of The Damned and Runaway bride were all dross in my view, except for Christmas Invasion and the half decent Next Doctor. Overall a decent piece of time-traveling pleasure for an hour of TV.

Re: Doctor Who: The Waters Of Mars review
Posted By DangerousDave 1 November 16, 2009 11:23:56 PM

Still reeling from watching Dr Who, Waters of Mars (WOM from now on). It was an enjoyable installment in the revitalised series. 1 hour only just did the story justice, however, but it was atmospheric and about as scary as Dr Who can get in a 7pm weekend time slot. In fact the only thing stopping my enjoyment of the episode was the gallumphing great plot hole in the middle of it and it all starts in a part of the action that is a side-line, character background, throw away even - namely, "Why did the Dalek fly away from the young Adelaide Brookes?" Lets start with the assumption: The Doctor says that the destruction of Bowie Base 1 (yeah, "Life on Mars", I got it - shame none of the caracters in WOM couldn't have been played by Dean Andrews or Marshall Lancaster . . .) is a fixed point in time, inviolatable. Further, Adelaide Brookes' death is essential as the driving force for her grand-daughter to become the first Human to travel FTL. That's all very well from a Human perspective - but why should the Dalek in "The Stolen Earth" Care? After all, the motivation of the Daleks in "The Stolen Earth" was to build a bomb big enough to destroy the entire universe (except their bomb shelter) and re-create it in their image. Adelaide Brookes, therefore, belongs to a future which wouldn't exist if the Daleks won. Look at it from the Dalek's point of view. It has three choices when it finds little Adelaide in the attic. Exterminate her, enslave her or (apparently) abandon her. Now the second assumption is that the Dalek "knew" that little Adelaide was highly important to Future History. So let's examine its three choices again: 1/. Exterminate her. Standard response for any Human that isn't useful as slave material (i.e. chilren, elderly, enemy soldiers). Knowing that Adelaide is a VIP in Human Future History makes her a potentially dangerous "fixed point" around which events could coalesce against the Dalek plan. So extermination sounds like a good plan. 2/. Enslave her. Standard response for any Human that can be made to further the Dalek plan. The Daleks could have used the knowledge that Adelaide is is a VIP in Human Future History to "turn" her and make her a Dalek "puppet", after all human children are easily manipulated by aspiring ultimate villains,no? Scuh a plan is devious and cunning and sure to win the Dalek a promotion . . . 3/. Abandon her. Standard Response when, erm, OK not a standard response at all. Only ever happened once - to Rose Tyler in the episode "Dalek". So, are we meant to believe that the Dalek turns and leaves Adelaide, who it suspects is important to *Human* Future History, and could seriously jeopardise *Dalek* Future History? Oh, come on! Be serious! Except that is exactly what happens. So, given that the Dalek has spared little Adelaide Brookes, and that it knows that she is important to Human Future History, what motivation could it have? Only one, for any true aspiring Master Race. It must be that leaving Adelaide to fulfill her destiny and die on Mars (or destroy Bowie Base 1) in 2059 puts the Humans at a disadvantage compared with the alternative plans of exterminating/enslaving her. Which, in turn, means that Dr Who was *right* to try and save her from Nuclear Destruction on Mars as it would provide a more positive outcome for humanity (and the Good Guys in general) . . . Or, the Dalek (with it's mega computer brain) made a stunningly bad judgement call in "The Stolen Earth". Or the Dalek *didn't* know little Adelaide Brookes from Adam. Or Russell T Davies placed a huge stinking great time-bomb of a plot hole in a Dr Who episode, just because he wanted to tie up a few loose ends (that didn't need tying). Again. D'oh!

Re: Doctor Who: The Waters Of Mars review
Posted By DangerousDave 1 November 16, 2009 11:26:30 PM

Oh, great. I'm sure the original text had paragraphs in it! If anyone at D.O.G. want's that post in all it's paragraphy, rtf glory just email me, it's in my profile!

Re: Doctor Who: The Waters Of Mars review
Posted By bobsuncorp 1 November 17, 2009 02:08:18 AM

My take on the Dalek's actions is this: The Daleks are frickin machines! (well cyborgs, but you know what I mean) by this I mean that they may well be able to use their sensors to detect time/space anomalies, including "fixed points". If the Dalek had exterminated her, this fixed point would have been deleted and the risk of those creatures from that episode where Rose's dad died appearing was too great as they could have got in the way of Davros' plan for total extermination. In the Rose episode, the Doctor made the analogy of these creatures being like an infection. Luckily the Doctor didn't cause the same result, but the Dalek couldn't be sure of this. So there.

Re: Doctor Who: The Waters Of Mars review
Posted By Omniaural 1 November 17, 2009 06:10:52 PM

There's no excuse for the Dalek moment. RTD FFed up there (see the other DW thread for what I'm talking about). Surely he could have written a better moment than that to act as an inspration.

Re: Doctor Who: The Waters Of Mars review
Posted By R-type 1 November 17, 2009 08:03:01 PM

What if the dalek knew that the reality bomb wouldnt work, and that killing adelaide as a child would disrupt the web of time and cause reality to be destroyed in a way where the daleks couldnt survive and remake it in their image? I mean Dalek Caan knew it, maybe all the daleks did and just davros didn't? I dunno, it does seem a huge plot hole, but then so does Gadget getting soaked in water and then going to earth when its snowing meaning the virus could travel. [or maybe they dried him off in the tardis unseen.] of course, y'know it could all be explained in the end of time.

Re: Doctor Who: The Waters Of Mars review
Posted By cloudbuster 1 November 18, 2009 02:42:22 PM

how could the Dalek we see have known that? There was a related earlier flashback scene in which Adelaide’s father(?) put her down, then said he was going to go find her mother. That Dalek could have been her mother. She looked down on her daughter one last time, then fled before the Dalek side of her could take any further action. She fled not because of any fixed point in time, but simply because some part of her was still her mother.

Re: Doctor Who: The Waters Of Mars review
Posted By ArabiaTerra 1 November 18, 2009 07:55:27 PM

The Daleks were created by Davros, a human mutant. If the human race never made it into Space, then no Daleks.

Re: Doctor Who: The Waters Of Mars review
Posted By DangerousDave 1 November 18, 2009 10:42:19 PM

Ah, the Reapers - I'd forgotten about them. Unfortunately they only appeared in the episode "Fathers Day" because Rose altered a *past* event in her personal history (or, was in view to another version of her future self as indicated by the Wikipedia article). In the flashback during "Waters of Mars" both the Dalek and Little Adelaide were properly in their own Time lines. Also, as we learned in the episode "Dalek" all these latest Daleks (what mark are we on now?) are constantly in touch with central control - so orders from the Emporer Dalek would have quickly been given!

Re: Doctor Who: The Waters Of Mars review
Posted By DangerousDave 1 November 18, 2009 10:47:53 PM

@ R-Type: Surely the Reality Bomb would have killed Little Adelaide anyway, disrupting time as you fear? @Cloudbuster 1: You're getting Daleks and Cybermen confused. Daleks would never allow a human to become one of the master race. except that one time in 1930's New York, and we all know how that ended! @ArabiaTerra: Daleks are not human, they have no conscience, no - erm - "humanity". The episode "Daleks in Manhatten" shows us what a human Dalek hybrid is like. And the pepperpots 'offed' him!

Re: Doctor Who: The Waters Of Mars review
Posted By DangerousDave 1 November 18, 2009 10:51:53 PM

Still, it's time for my bed, 'mes braves'. I still think the "Stoen Earth" flashback was an uneccessary and sloppy error. Unfortunately RTD does seem prone to just this sort of thing. Which spoils an otherwise well plotted and grandly envisioned episode. G'night!

Re: Doctor Who: The Waters Of Mars review
Posted By DangerousDave 1 November 18, 2009 10:52:46 PM

Argh, "Stolen Earth" not Stoen. And, yes, I am a pedant!

Re: Doctor Who: The Waters Of Mars review
Posted By Marley 1 November 19, 2009 08:55:18 PM

Oh well, obviously out of line with everyone else. I thought it was middling to feeble. The whole conceit hangs on the Doctor's utterly unconvincing assertion that this one event is key and cannot be changed. Why? Why this one? Why can't someone else lead the charge into space? He even says that it's only an idea. And off this Russel T Davies, a writer with no feel at all for science fiction, tries yet again to hang a sense of epic doom. Something he's failed horribly to achieve in every single season finale so far. Sadly the trailers look like more of the same bumpf for the next two eps. Never mind, roll on Moffat. (Will miss Tennant, though!)
Post a Comment
 
David Tennant as Doctor Who in The Waters Of Mars

The critical verdict on Waters of Mars has been generally positive

Follow Den of Geek on

Related Articles

SEARCH

Broadband

Mobile Broadband

Compare over 100 mobile broadband & broadband deals online!

Mobile Phones

LG ArenaHTC Magic

Compare over 250 mobile phones &
52,000 deals!