Amazon.co.uk Widgets
Den of Geek

The Incredible Hulk review

Sarah Dobbs


Sarah goes to see The Incredible Hulk, but wonders if she hasn't accidentally strayed into The Abomination instead?

Published on Jun 9, 2008

WARNING: Spoilertastic!

There are some superheroes who really don't need much by way of introduction. We all know that Superman's from Krypton; that Spider-Man was bitten by some kind of scienced-up spider; and that Bruce Banner, when he gets angry, becomes the Hulk. So it's hugely refreshing when, instead of rehashing the same old tired origin story all over again, The Incredible Hulk dispenses with the pleasantries and gets all that gamma ray stuff out of the way during the credits sequence.

However, while it's very cool that the film acknowledged that what's cool about superheroes is what they do after they've got their powers, it's kind of unfortunate that instead the filmmakers spent most of this film telling the origin story of Abomination instead.

I'll hold my hands up here and admit that I know precisely sod all about Abomination from the comics - and I'm not sure I'm any the wiser after the movie. A loose three-act structure falls into place around Abomination's (or, in his human form, Emil Blonsky's) encounters with the Hulk/Bruce Banner; some other stuff happens along the way, but the three fights between Blonsky and Banner are the tentpoles that the rest of the film is draped over. Um, but to just stretch that metaphor a little further than it can comfortably go - they're crooked. Obviously, each fight is bigger and more destructive than the last, but each successive fight is also much less involving because there's more and more CGI every time the two of them face off.

And, oh, the CGI. If you've seen the trailers or posters or promotional images for this movie, you already know what it looks like - and it's not pretty. It's all very accomplished, and there are scenes involving rain just to show off all those not-quite-realistic-looking textures, but the fight scenes never look like anything other than a computer game. It never looks real, and there's never anything at stake; admiring the technical skill of the graphic artists is about as close as you'll ever get to feeling any real emotion during this film.

Ang Lee's Hulk has mostly been criticised for including too much drama and not enough superhero. This version of The Incredible Hulk features plenty of the green guy, but there's never really any point to it. Edward Norton might as well be sleepwalking through his scenes as Bruce, and Liv Tyler as Betty is completely devoid of personality - she's supposed to be a doctor, she's General Ross's daughter, there's plenty of material to work with, but she only ever gets to play the generic teary-eyed love interest for the anti-hero here. And a curiously lacking in chemistry love interest, at that. Ross's maniacal vendetta against the Hulk is supremely unthreatening, and Abomination's motives for wanting to fight seem to have been ripped straight out of Dragonball Z. Actually, the final fight scene is very reminiscent of that particular anime series: it's just two obscenely muscular men, with muscles piled on top of muscles where no human being should have muscles, facing off against one another purely for the sake of seeing who's stronger. I'm amazed neither of their power levels approached nine thousand, but I guess the inevitable "Hulk smash!" moment was a decent substitute for that.

There are a couple of very geeky nods to the fanbase in this movie - from the Nick Fury and Stark Industries name checks during the beginning credits to Bruce's refusal to even try on his iconic purple trunks - but then even Fantastic Four did things like that. And sometimes The Incredible Hulk gets it wrong, anyway; in the movie, Samuel Sterns is a highly intelligent scientist (even if he is a bit misguided, and working with substandard equipment) whereas in the comics he was, at best, an inept menial worker. Stan Lee's obligatory cameo was just bizarre (who was he supposed to be, and what was he doing there?) and though it's pretty cool of them to get Lou Ferrigno involved, the fact that I can remember more about the cameos and geeky winks than anything else about the film can't be a good sign.

It's only been a couple of hours since I saw The Incredible Hulk, and already the memory is fading. In the grand scheme of Marvel superhero movies, this was never going to be Spider-man 2, but I thought it might at least give Ghost Rider a run for his money. Actually, this probably should be placed underneath the Fantastic Four movies in the stack: it's not particularly clever, it's not particularly entertaining, and it somehow lacks any kind of emotional resonance whatsoever. Really, I wasn't expecting a Hulk movie to be anything other than a bit of brainless, fast-paced entertainment, but at a whopping 114 minutes in which virtually nothing real happens, it fails even at that. It's a damp squib.

Finally, at the screening I attended, the scene featuring Tony Stark came right before the credits, which seemed weird since the final, please-let-us-do-a-sequel moment had already happened and the screen had faded to black. I stayed until all the credits had rolled, and there was nothing afterwards, so I wonder whether, in the proper theatrical release, the random, pointless Tony Stark part will come after the credits? Personally, I don't think I could be bothered to go and see it again to find out.

2 out of 5 (and one of those was for Tony Stark.)

Sarah's got a list of things that could have made The Incredible Hulk better - read it here.

 

Users Comments

Re: The Incredible Hulk review
Posted By twosheds 1 June 9, 2008 11:22:47 PM

Hulk by the numbers, eh? Pity...

Re: The Incredible Hulk review
Posted By stuxmusic 1 June 10, 2008 01:12:55 AM

Damn. I was hoping this would be good, 'Hulk' was just... awful. Bad choice of actors, wrong director, bad editing choices. Still going to see this one mind you.

Re: The Incredible Hulk review
Posted By Djomigod 1 June 10, 2008 04:00:45 AM

SOMEone got off on the wrong side of the bed! Clearly not a fan. If you're expecting something 'real' to happen in what is essentially a heroic take on Frankenstein meets Mr. Hyde, I think you're asking too much! Guess You didn't ever enjoy a Godzilla movie or ole' King Kong, huh? You're asking for emotional resonance from a blockbuster, action Monster Movie. Everyone a critic- some people just get off on getting paid to whine, for whatever reason...

Re: The Incredible Hulk review
Posted By Spidergirl 1 June 10, 2008 06:34:55 AM

"Everyone's a critic." Yup, especially people writing film reviews! :D

Re: The Incredible Hulk review
Posted By Uthell 1 June 10, 2008 09:05:16 AM

That is the most off the mark review I have read in a while. I saw Hulk last night and can say its as good as Iron Man if not better. It stands up as a good movie and a good comic adaptation. 4 stars and one of the most enjoyable movies thus far this year.

Re: The Incredible Hulk review
Posted By DuncanMonkey 1 June 10, 2008 12:58:22 PM

I'll hold off reading this till I've seen it (thanks for the spoiler heads up), but I'm especially excited about the bit where Edward Norton goes off to find himself, but instead grows a beard and pretends to be me!

Re: The Incredible Hulk review
Posted By TVDust1 1 June 10, 2008 01:01:11 PM

Sarah, you have confirmed all of my worse fears. Cheers for saving me a tenner.

Re: The Incredible Hulk review
Posted By Norton77 1 June 10, 2008 02:11:50 PM

Hulk smash puny reviewer!! Actually, this film does look quite poor. Silly ol' Tim Roth, getting involved in such rubbish just so his young boys have something to watch (I'm paraphrasing his recent 'Metro' interview... I'm very highbrow, don't you know).

Re: The Incredible Hulk review
Posted By Spidergirl 1 June 10, 2008 02:17:52 PM

I considered wearing my "HULK SMASH" t-shirt, but in the end I went with my Hulk "Don't get me angry!" t-shirt. And, y'know, the film didn't get me angry, but maybe I should buy a shirt saying "Don't make me bored!" instead.

Re: The Incredible Hulk review
Posted By SeanFracture 1 June 10, 2008 02:32:31 PM

"SOMEone got off on the wrong side of the bed! Clearly not a fan. If you're expecting something 'real' to happen in what is essentially a heroic take on Frankenstein meets Mr. Hyde, I think you're asking too much! Guess You didn't ever enjoy a Godzilla movie or ole' King Kong, huh? You're asking for emotional resonance from a blockbuster, action Monster Movie. Everyone a critic- some people just get off on getting paid to whine, for whatever reason..." Worst comment ever. The review criticised the lack of real plot and emotional resonance, not the realism. And anyway, critics getting paid to criticise! Whatever next!? I'd TOTALLY get off on getting paid to whine. Are you, in fact, the Comic Book Guy?

Re: The Incredible Hulk review
Posted By SeanFracture 1 June 10, 2008 02:45:44 PM

Oh, and it's worth mentioning that both the films you used to compare to the Hulk were chock full of emotional resonance. What's your point exactly?

Re: The Incredible Hulk review
Posted By JacX1 1 June 13, 2008 09:13:47 AM

2003's Hulk was a great movie. There was no reason to re-due the whole thing, and now that they have... it's gonna be a huge let-down. I hope the audience is happy now... you've got the damn action you wanted, you've got no good diolouge, you've got no good actors to fit this movie, forget all that. Go ahead... go watch it and hate it or love it. This is not the movie I've been waiting a sequal to, the movie I wanted ended with Ang Lee. Screw you guys... I'm going home.
Post a Comment
 
Another bad hair day for our hero. Uh oh. Someone's stolen his sweetcorn.

Follow Den of Geek on

Related Articles

SEARCH

Broadband

Mobile Broadband

Compare over 100 mobile broadband & broadband deals online!

Mobile Phones

LG ArenaHTC Magic

Compare over 250 mobile phones &
52,000 deals!