Den of Geek

Watchmen review

Michael Leader


We review Watchmen, the most highly anticipated superhero movie of 2009. But is it faithful...?

Published on Feb 24, 2009

Fanboys, lay down your noble swords. Watchmen the movie is here, and it is good.

As the opening titles of Watchmen kick in, an elegiac, graceful montage of photographs passes by, narrating and illustrating its slightly altered, kinky universe - Nixon re-elected for a third term, masked heroes forming a team called the Minutemen, before disbanding - backed by the downbeat strums of Dylan telling us 'The times they are a'changin''. Breath a sigh of relief, as this is the best of all possible worlds.

Zack Snyder, the dude who brought you muscles, testosterone and stylish man-nipples in 300, takes his meticulous hyper-real approach to cinematic art and marries it to Moore and Gibbons' seminal graphic novel.

In bringing Watchmen to the screen, Snyder and co. have accepted the boundaries of the medium and, for this theatrical cut, have sought to trim away the side-glances, extra-narrative material and metafictional depth that is one aspect of the comic's genius.

Gone is Tales of the Black Freighter, Under the Hood and other bits of colouring. Importantly, however, that still leaves more than enough story to give the film ample depth and complexity for its 2 hours and 40-odd minutes.

Set years after an act that outlaws masked vigilantes, the members of the Minutemen - a team of heroes - are spurred back into action by murderous mystery and international conspiracy. The narrative presents enough twists and turns to keep the audience engaged and gripped but, as any reader of the comic would know, Watchmen is more than action pulp. This manifests in the film as a conflicted, emotionally-charged, character-driven ensemble drama, as the distinct heroes - the nuclear demigod Dr. Manhattan (Billy Crudup), the Tom Waits meets Phillip Marlowe gumshoe Rorschach (Jackie Earle Haley), the affable tech-whiz Nite Owl (Patrick Wilson), amongst others - come together in debates on crime-fighting, politics and philosophy. Heavy on flashbacks, the narrative trajectory is as complex as the characters it creates.

Of course, as an adaptation, voices clamour for a list of changes made in transition. For the most part, the comic book is used as a very close source, provoking wonderful moments of frame-by-frame fidelity. Moments are exaggerated, extended or tweaked, either to give scenes more impact or to provide a more satisfying screen experience. Even though most of these changes are seamless and work within the logic of the movie, there are some howlers towards the end of the film, which drastically change the nature of the end-of-the-world plot and alters the final handful of scenes, and final glimpses of key characters, in the process. It is frustrating, because it jars with the lightness of touch seen in the rest of the film.

What makes Watchmen the movie stand out as a must-see experience, however, is found in its cinematic values. Having Snyder as director guarantees extreme violence and gratuitous use of slow-mo, although these action scenes are firmly rooted in emotional storytelling - for example, Nite Owl and Laurie Jupiter's (Marin Akerman) tentative forays back into crime-fighting, while bloody and brutal, are laced with triumph and catharsis thanks to the narrative's prior legwork.

Equally, the book contains myriad references to pop music, notably Bob Dylan's All Along The Watchtower, but use of original tracks to underpin key scenes and montages help set context and history, as well as providing a whole extra level of stimulation impossible in comics. Fans should have their breath taken away by the audio-visual impact of well-placed use of Nat King Cole's Unforgettable in the opening scene, or KC & The Sunshine Band's I'm Your Boogie Man as Nite Owl and The Comedian (Jeffrey Dean Morgan) quell riots in disco-era New York City.

Importantly, it is also used to great effect to characterise the mixture of tones and themes of the film's narrative strands - from the Mark Knopfler-esque guitar introspection for the awkward and tender relationship between Nite Owl and Laurie Jupiter to the towering strings of Phillip Glass' monumental modernism for Dr. Manhattan's wholly godlike creation story. Coupled with a flawless approach to set and production design, Watchmen looks and sounds great.

These production flourishes would be ineffective window dressing if not for the work of a well-chosen and competent cast. The lack of a discernible 'big star', and ensemble approach, allows each actor to stretch out and impress, inhabiting the complexities yet nailing the fundamentals of their roles. Billy Crudup, embraced by a blue glow and exposing a CGI penis for the world to see, speaks in an ethereal, otherworldly murmur, at the same time vastly assured and profoundly sad, but each member of the main cast deserve praise for their work.

Comparisons will inevitably occur between the film and the 2008 movie that 'made comic movies artful', The Dark Knight. However, it is in Watchmen's ensemble nature, wide canvas and deep complexity that it trounces the best efforts of Christopher Nolan's staggeringly successful blockbuster.

Far and beyond the dualities and binary-relationships of chaos/order, madness/determination and Joker/Batman, Watchmen presents a spectrum of morals and perspectives. It boldly interrogates the notions of heroes and villains, and the old adage of ends justifying means. It also performs the minor miracle of making all-out action sequences that are stylised, violent and yet not truly gratuitous. The comic came out at a time where violence and sex were still taboo, and due to the escalation of time, Snyder takes these up a notch. That is not to say he does it without grace, however.

Watchmen is still an adaptation, and is imperfect as a result. Taken out of its publication context, and with elements of its world and narrative shorn off, much of its charm and genius is missing. However, so much could have gone wrong; what we have been given is presented almost entirely faithfully, with enough tricks and style of its own to warrant a viewing. It is hard to imagine a better screen representation of this 'unfilmable' graphic novel.

4 stars

 

Tags

Users Comments

Re: Watchmen review
Posted By KevinPocock 1 February 24, 2009 01:08:25 PM

Cracking review Mr Leader - can't wait to see the film either.

Re: Watchmen review
Posted By danielbettridge 1 February 24, 2009 01:29:50 PM

Managed to score a screening last week and wholeheartedly agree. The soundtrack was imense and really made the film for me. I must admit though i really like the changes and think they updated the film for the current political climate and issues just as Moore's nod to sci fi fitted with the 80s version.

Re: Watchmen review
Posted By capt_1ntens0 1 February 26, 2009 12:06:54 PM

That's just got me the right amount of excited. I've been trying to not get OTT excited whilst seeing trailers etc but this review sounds like the theatrical cut will do itself justice until all Watchmen book fans can finally indulge in the 3hr+ directors cut. Cannot wait!

Re: Watchmen review
Posted By princesspeach 1 March 3, 2009 08:28:40 PM

The movie stunk. It was long and pointless and didn't make sense. It jumped all over the place, none of the characters storylines went together or with the movie as a whole. It was dark and bring and the opening intro was the longest I've ever seen in my life. It was a sign of BORING things to come. I only made it 1.5 hrs and then I had to leave the theatre. Maybe the last part of the movie had action in it, the rest sure did not!

Re: Watchmen review
Posted By Grrr 1 March 5, 2009 03:38:49 PM

There's nothing worse than sitting through a film that's "dark & bring"... except advertisers who shove postings under feedback columns.

Re: Watchmen review
Posted By goatboy_snr 1 March 6, 2009 10:20:45 AM

Ha! princesspeach's comment above is exactly why Watchmen is doomed to become a commercial failure, this is by budget but not content/quality. People will expect another Dark Knight or Spiderman because of the level of hype pushed by the studio to make big money. The simple fact is that this isn't a superhero movie, it has that but it also tries to give a genuine depth, and indeed it is more of a people film. Apart from fanboys, it's going to have a hard time finding it's market. Perhaps some people should just go buy a Fantastic Four box set and enjoy the loud noises and flashes :) I love the book, and the film could not have been made any better - DB

Re: Watchmen review
Posted By cordas 1 March 8, 2009 10:12:01 PM

I dunno, I think its wrong to try and put this film in the same bracket as Dark Knight and Spiderman. Those movies are comic book and aimed at PG13 audience, this is something different, its an adult take on a graphic novel aimed at an older and hopefully more expectant audience... an audience that will appreciate that whilst this a special effects laden movie it isn't one driven by them. Whether or not this movie will find that audience is a difficult question to answer time will tell. I haven't read the graphic novels, but I loved this movie and I want/need to see it again, I am sure there was a lot more going on than I saw with my 1st viewing. Having heard from friends what happened in the books I am curious to see how that works, because the "changed" ending to me work perfectly, the twist is nasty and masterful it gives the film a rather unsettling feel if you are prepared to think about it and what it means to the people involved. I would put this film into the same bracket as Sin City and maybe 300 (which its much better than imho), its grown up and asks for a greater investment than the ticket price and a tray of nacho's it wants the audience to get involved with the broken dreams and tangled mess that the characters find themselves in.
Post a Comment
 
Watchmen

Watchmen

Follow Den of Geek on

Related Articles

SEARCH

Mobile Phones

LG ArenaHTC Magic

Compare over 250 mobile phones &
52,000 deals!