Den of Geek

Have CG monsters ever been frightening?

Simon Brew


In some cases, it was like watching the showreel for a computer graphics expert. Technically brilliant, but with entertainment removed.

As the latest crop of invaders in Cowboys & Aliens fail to intimidate, Simon wonders, has a computer-generated monster ever been truly scary?

Published on Aug 19, 2011

Walking out of a screening of Cowboys & Aliens, I couldn’t help but think that when the film was a western, it worked, and when it was to do with aliens, it didn’t. One of its faults, to my mind, was that it relied on CG monsters to try and intimidate, scare and interest its audience. And for my money, the computer generated aliens managed to do none of those things.

I’d had a similar reaction this summer to the last act of Super 8, and it got me thinking: has there ever been a point when a CG monster has been scary in any way whatsoever? The closest I could come were some of the dinosaurs in the original Jurassic Park (they weren’t outright terrifying for me, but they did generate convincing tension). But there’s been nothing to match the impact of more tangible creations, in the eye of the camera itself.

I think back to the monsters and aliens over the years that have genuinely managed to unnerve me. The alien in Alien and Aliens (although not the computerised ones that followed in some of the sequels). The Thing. The zombies of George A Romero's movies.

What most of those have in common is that they were real, physical effects, rather than generated by computer. I’m not sure whether that’s coincidence or not, as there’s an argument that, over the years, we’ve all become a bit desensitised to aliens and monsters anyway. Television shows throw them out with alarming regularity, and that means on the big screen, it’s becoming harder and harder to impress an audience.

The last aliens on the big screen that I thought worked were those in the much-maligned Skyline, simply because visually, I bought them. But scary or intimidating? Not at all.

Maybe this is an art that the movies have lost. Certainly, the ability of computers to bilge creatures onto the screen means that restraint has all but gone out of the window. The notion of only letting us glimpse at a creature isn’t gone entirely, of course, as Cloverfield pretty much made a film out of that. But in that example, and many others, when it came to the big reveal, the product of the special effects team was really quite underwhelming. You could say the same of Frank Darabont’s The Mist, too.

I put the question out onto Twitter, as to what movie creatures and aliens genuinely put the shivers up some of our followers. Pretty much every answer, with a few exceptions, was of a physical creation of sorts. So we had The Creature From The Black Lagoon. Lots of people citing The Thing and Alien. The Blob. The Incredible Shrinking Man. It. A quick shout for Candyman. The reavers from Serenity, and the zombie lepers from The Fog. The Pale Man from Pan’s Labyrinth, too (fantastic call, that one).

At the heart of nearly every one of those? Someone in a costume, on a movie set.

I do think, though, that CG can still be used to scary effect, it just has to be deployed very carefully. Look at the low-cost, highly-effective glowing teeth effect that Joe Cornish applies to Attack The Block. There’s no massive computer-created face or anything. Just an adherence to a simple horror dynamic, made possible through a computer. I’d also suggest that Toy Story 3 proved you can make genuinely terrifying horror movie characters with computers. Two of the creations in that film still manage to put the chills up me.

But there are a small handful of exceptions. And I can’t help but wonder if the movies’ skill at scaring us with monsters and aliens has all but dissipated now. In fact, if anything, it’s the small screen where ingenuity still rules. Doctor Who’s weeping angels, and the Silence, are convincing, and have the ability to get under your skin. I didn’t come close to reacting like that in films such as Super 8, Cowboys & Aliens, Clash Of The Titans, Transformers, Signs, War Of The Worlds, I Am Legend, Species, Resident Evil… well, you can fill in the rest of the list for yourself.

What most of these films had in common, ultimately, was that each had a computer generated foe (or foes) that, with the possible exception of Super 8, I didn’t give two hoots about, and, crucially, got no pleasure from watching. In some cases, it was like watching the showreel for a computer graphics expert. Technically brilliant, but with entertainment removed.

Creating genuinely scary creatures and monsters is hard work, and requires a writer and director who know what to show, and what to not. That in itself is a tough skill, and if we’re being circumspect, then there aren’t too many examples from the 70s, 80s and early 90s, before computers took hold, to cite. But I find it interesting that the ones that really stick in our minds – and The Thing and Alien are the names that keep cropping up – were a product of brilliant film makers knowing just how to make the most of what they had.

Thus, computers can’t be blamed altogether. But also, the search for a genuinely scary CG monster on the big screen continues. On the evidence of how aliens are treated in the likes of Cowboys & Aliens, it’s set to go on for some time to come.

Follow Den Of Geek on Twitter right here. And be our Facebook chum here.

 

Tags

Users Comments

Re: Have CG monsters ever been frightening?
Posted By jude2004 1 August 22, 2011 09:41:01 AM

I can't imagine the scene where the alien sticks its face right up against Ripley's would be the same if done with CGI. Sigourney Weaver would simply not have acted in the same way. Half the terror comes from her reaction.

Re: Have CG monsters ever been frightening?
Posted By ruinawish 1 August 22, 2011 09:50:34 AM

Starship Troopers? No, I'm not talking about Denise Richards...

Re: Have CG monsters ever been frightening?
Posted By easytigergb 1 August 22, 2011 10:28:11 AM

for me, the scariest monster I have seen in a long long time is the empty child from Doctor Who. "Are you my mummy?" I've got goosebumps just thinking about it. You did a piece a few weeks ago about Spielberg being the best horror director of all time; the discussion being that it's the familiar gone wrong that makes the most terrifying frights of all. I genuinely buy that. Good call for Pan's Labrynth too.

Re: Have CG monsters ever been frightening?
Posted By TigressUK 1 August 22, 2011 10:32:19 AM

Signs still gives me the occasional nightmare. The aliens may not be convincing in their entirety but you can't deny that they were freaky when you saw small glimpses of them (though admittedly, coupled with James Newton Howard's disturbing soundtrack).

Re: Have CG monsters ever been frightening?
Posted By TigressUK 1 August 22, 2011 10:34:51 AM

Signs still gives me the occasional nightmare. The aliens may not be convincing in their entirety but you can't deny that they were freaky when you saw small glimpses of them (though admittedly, coupled with James Newton Howard's disturbing soundtrack).

Re: Have CG monsters ever been frightening?
Posted By paulychilds 1 August 22, 2011 11:31:03 AM

I'm glad you mention Signs... That film was, for 95% of the time, great with building, Hitchcockian tension and a Lewtonesque skill for revealing very little of the monster. Until... The final showdown when we see the alien in all its 'glory'. What a let down!

Re: Have CG monsters ever been frightening?
Posted By groc 1 August 22, 2011 11:31:53 AM

^good call on Ripley. I wonder if that does have a subtle effect on us as an audience in that we're now only seeing actors respond to green screens and ping pong balls on sticks? We can tell they're faking it. Myself - I am just so bored bored bored of cgi being used in everything now. With the exception of all cgi pixar films. There is a difference cgi creatures just don't move right - they're too smooth - there's no weight, no friction. Great for spaceships maybe... but creatures? Nah.

Re: Have CG monsters ever been frightening?
Posted By Shilling 1 August 22, 2011 11:48:28 AM

Good article. Why can't so many film-makers understand this? CGI can do a lot of great things, but it can't scare us (not unless you're really, really clever and subtle with it). Some more notable "physical effects" monsters: Dog Soldiers. The Descent. Evil Dead and Drag Me to Hell. Tremors (yeah Tremors creeped me out when I first saw it as a kid).

Re: Have CG monsters ever been frightening?
Posted By RebelDog 1 August 22, 2011 11:52:23 AM

Not strictly "monsters" but the apes from the Planet of the Apes are very convincing, and while not scary in the sense of horror, they do generate a very real sense of threat. For my money this is probably the closest to fulfill the criteria of CGI creatures provoking a genuine fear reaction from a viewer.

Re: Have CG monsters ever been frightening?
Posted By rabbitc 1 August 22, 2011 12:38:22 PM

A good article. I think the point is that CG CAN be scary if used in the right way. Personally, I'm looking forward to Ridley Scott poo-pooing years of CG horror making with some good ole' fashioned props and makeup. Watch closely, folks.

Re: Have CG monsters ever been frightening?
Posted By Friction 1 August 22, 2011 12:55:28 PM

Gollum has been heralded as the triumph of cgI creatures...and I was inclined to agree. Really it was an amazing feat. the I saw Pan's Labyrinth's Pale Man and thought this is so many worlds ahead as an effect it bears no comparision. It's great to suspend disbelief and a bloke in makeup can just look like a bloke in makeup but atleast you can believe he functions within the same world as the other characters on screen.

Re: Have CG monsters ever been frightening?
Posted By hensoloo1ax 1 August 22, 2011 01:00:47 PM

I actually found some of the creatures in the Mist to be quite frightening. Also Lord Of The Rings has some pretty good examples of CG beasties that have weight. Maybe not scary though. One thing that really rings true is this idea of the familiar gone wrong. One of the scary things about some monsters e.g. The Pale Man is that they're almost human. We can see ourselves in them but not quite. CG allows creatures to be so far removed from anything we recognise or see, it often doesn't tap in to our hard wired fears. To scare us a monster should take something from the real world that we know and distort it so we have that old fashioned instictive fear of it. They could play upon our fear of the unknown like Ridley Scott does in Alien but the temptation is to show everything by which point it's not unknown and becomes less intimidating.

Re: Have CG monsters ever been frightening?
Posted By DavidFullam 1 August 22, 2011 01:01:35 PM

Excuse me, The Host!

Re: Have CG monsters ever been frightening?
Posted By Holmes 1 August 22, 2011 01:38:38 PM

Shelob in LOTR was pretty creepy (but who wouldn't be creeped out by a giant spider). I thought Pitch Black made pretty effective use of CGI as well.

Re: Have CG monsters ever been frightening?
Posted By lrrr23 1 August 22, 2011 02:15:24 PM

Gangers from Doctor Who. And I'm not talking the final form when they were nothing but a giant mess of CGI but the scene where Jennifer's head flies out at Rory. Terrified me. But it just gives more support to the idea of CGI only being effective in small subtle doses

Re: Have CG monsters ever been frightening?
Posted By paulychilds 1 August 22, 2011 04:13:34 PM

Irrr23 - That episode got so much right, but so much wrong also. The big monster at the end was creepy and menacing when she was blurred from being in the background, but as soon as we got a close up - all the terror was gone. Think of The Others or the original The Haunting. Sounds, and suggestion, provided the scares rather than in your face visuals.

Re: Have CG monsters ever been frightening?
Posted By paulychilds 1 August 22, 2011 05:09:30 PM

I thought the dinosaurs in the first JP were really quite scary, the tripods plus inhabitants and attachments in WOTW were genuinely menacing and the spiders in Minority Report gave me the creeps. All Spielberg films. As discussed in another article - he has not forgotten the lessons he learnt making Jaws - less is more, especially when it comes to frights.a

Re: Have CG monsters ever been frightening?
Posted By NickD 1 August 22, 2011 09:05:53 PM

I like CGI in very specific thing... It can do things that are very expensive or practically impossible to achieve. I suppose it comes down to if say a great director had the money and ability to shoe their creation (think The Thing, Jaws, Alien etc) if the creature could be seen on the screen in all its glory... Would they have shown it? I hope not. I think CGI works better for making more 'character' roles rather than 'monster' roles. Part of the problem is that they can create such weird and strange ideas like earlier noted that remove us from that sense of 'knowing' the threat/enemy. For me nothing has scared or thrilled me more than the big reveals in Independsnce Day, Alien, Aliens (the Queen is a fantastic character) and so is one of my all time favourites.., the Predator, a great character and design... And nothing but a good actor in a rubber suit.

Re: Have CG monsters ever been frightening?
Posted By rottenjohnny 1 August 22, 2011 09:36:23 PM

Hmmm.. I don't remember being scared by any CG monster, but then I can't say I've been genuinely scared by a film or TV show for a long, long time. I'm not bragging here, as I used to be petrified by pretty much everything as a child. Perhaps there are some kids out there terrified of CG monsters because they know little else. Another problem may be that film-makers now tend to throw everything at the screen at once, rather than allowing films to build up any tension. Compare and contrast the 2 Clash of the Titan films. The CG Medusa scene played like a typical action film, whilst the Harryhausen version was closer to horror.

Re: Have CG monsters ever been frightening?
Posted By paulychilds 1 August 22, 2011 10:01:52 PM

I watched 'Daylight' the other day on ITV, just because it was on, and I commented to my wife how refreshing it was to watch an action film with real stunts, real explosions and very little CG effects (the chemical fire at the start). Compare the mass destruction of, say, Lethal Weapon 3 or Demolition Man with GG heavy actioners such as Die Another Day or Knight & Day - it's the 'real' stunts which have a more thrilling sense of peril and danger.

Re: Have CG monsters ever been frightening?
Posted By hia09af 1 August 22, 2011 10:46:04 PM

I just want to put forth the aliens from District 9 as a good example of CG "monsters". I wouldn't say they were strictly 'frightening', however there was definitely something unnerving about them and for me, they evoked sympathy as well as a sense of unease - which I thought was very effective.

Re: Have CG monsters ever been frightening?
Posted By DarkPsion 1 August 23, 2011 12:02:50 AM

What is with the "Blubbery" CGI? The dinosaurs in King Kong, Cloverfield, the Kraken. That whale blubber effect really spoils the FX for me.

Re: Have CG monsters ever been frightening?
Posted By NickelobLight 1 August 23, 2011 03:04:42 AM

Compare the zombies when they're first revealed in the first Resident Evil. They're REAL PEOPLE! The guy with the dislocated foot? Creepy as hell! Then near the end...the Licker? Bleh. Silly looking. Just my 2 cents.

Re: Have CG monsters ever been frightening?
Posted By AbsoluteVirtue 1 August 23, 2011 07:57:42 AM

Another underated horror movie that had real effects was 'The Descent' and those cave creatures. I do agree that film-makers tend to rely on CG too much instead of going the extra mile and use practical effects. It's not a bad thing to use CG, but it must be done in a way that doesn't break the focus on what makes the monster threatening. The 'T-1000' from 'Terminator 2' is a good example where CG and practical effects can come together successfully to make an intimidating movie monster.

Re: Have CG monsters ever been frightening?
Posted By robomorph42 1 August 23, 2011 09:18:57 AM

Excellent article, though lacking one of the most terrifying CG aliens ever created: Jar Jar Binks.

Re: Have CG monsters ever been frightening?
Posted By mattchew 1 August 23, 2011 01:45:55 PM

Love the comment about JarJar!!! OK it's bugging me... which movies are the 3 aliens in the main image from (I think one of them is Species)

Re: Have CG monsters ever been frightening?
Posted By Drivad 1 August 23, 2011 01:50:14 PM

The thing that has scared me most in my life is the alien that walks past the birthday party in Signs. There's probably nothing scary about it but it terrified me for months. But i think the concept is scarier than execution. Anything where people get turned into something gets to me (to this day I cans watch the scene where the woman gets turned into a robot in Superman 3.)

Re: Have CG monsters ever been frightening?
Posted By paulychilds 1 August 23, 2011 02:41:32 PM

Not sure about the top one - possible Super 8 (not seen it yet but the mention of glowing blood made me think that). Bottom right... not sure... is that Independance Day?

Re: Have CG monsters ever been frightening?
Posted By loriservo 1 August 23, 2011 04:43:24 PM

I agree with the comment about District 9, I thought the creatures were very effective, if not scary, although the last "movie monster" that genuinely scared me was Tim Curry in IT...

Re: Have CG monsters ever been frightening?
Posted By CymbalKiller 1 August 24, 2011 08:53:09 PM

IT? Really? I remember being horribly disappointed by that--and I loved the book!........No bragging, RottenJohnny, I’ve never really been affected by movie monsters, either. I read The Exorcist at the tender age of 8, that’s how jaded I am! For me, it’s not the monsters themselves, it’s the psychological aspect that’s more frightening........ In fact, the ‘alien’ factor plays a large part in how movie monsters affect me, now that I’m thinking of it. The fact that the **creepingwhatevers** want to destroy you, not knowing anything about you, except that you’re in their way is pretty scary. That means there’s no way to reason with them, no way to appeal to them, or anything—basically, no hope (yes, kind of like the Terminator). Yeah, that’s scary. From that point of view, Aliens, Starship Troopers and pretty much any (serious) ‘Aliens Attack’ movie does it for me........ Alien Eggs—just the idea of being in an Egg Room with hundreds of those things is a nightmare. It’s the fact that there’s no real escape that makes it so frightening........ Hellraiser—Not the creatures themselves, so much as the thought that, if you’re not careful, you can become one. And the fact that, from that, there’s no escape........ Wishmaster—Not the Djinn, but the fact that you’re actually creating your own hell, with the only escape being the almost impossible task of outsmarting this thousands-of-years old creature who’s been playing this game for centuries........ And the actor’s response definitely contributes. The monster is just a suit (or an image) without atmosphere.

Re: Have CG monsters ever been frightening?
Posted By Exterminieren 1 August 25, 2011 11:51:41 AM

It's funny that you bring up Doctor Who, because when scary CGI monsters are mentioned, I find it hard to look past the werewolf from a few seasons back. A real sense of weight and presence, largely accomplished through clever direction and making the most of a limited budget.

Re: Have CG monsters ever been frightening?
Posted By DraconianOne 1 September 20, 2011 11:59:01 AM

re: pictures in the post. From the top- 1. Skyline 2. Cloverfield 3. Pan's Labyrinth 4. Signs
Post a Comment
Security Code* Get another image
 
 
Untitled Document

Follow Den of Geek on

Related Articles

SEARCH

Coke Zero
Advertisement