Den of Geek

Doctor Who series 5 episode 4: The Time Of Angels review

Simon Brew


The return of River Song. The second coming of the Weeping Angels. But was Doctor Who: The Time Of Angels any good? Here's our spoiler-filled review...

Published on Apr 24, 2010


PLEASE NOTE: THIS REVIEW CONTAINS SPOILERS. OUR SPOILER-FREE REVIEW IS HERE.

Right then. Let’s get the obvious out of the way first: Blink that wasn’t. For reasons we discussed in the spoiler-free review yesterday, there was never really a chance that the weeping angels were going to have quite the same impact in The Time Of Angels that they did when they first appeared. That’s the nature of the beast.

Nonetheless, you have to give Steven Moffat some fairly hefty credit here. Appreciating that we’re all pretty much au fait with the idea of not blinking when the angels are around, and appreciating that it’s hard to make us jump out of our seat in the same manner that he did the first time round, he’s still got a few ideas to make his finest monster creations very effective.

The centrepiece moment for them in The Time Of Angels was the marvellous slight homage to a certain Japanese horror movie (not mentioning it for fear of spoiling it for those who haven’t seen it!), where Amy finds herself locked in the bunker-esque vehicle staring at seemingly recorded footage of what’s supposedly the only weeping angel in the vicinity. He slowly builds it up, and you just know something’s going to happen. And just as you’re thinking that the angel doesn’t look quite as scary this time round, the damn thing jumps out of the screen.

It’s a really effective, and really quite creepy device, not least because once more it allows Amy to show herself to be one of the finest problem-solvers that the Doctor has ever travelled with. If you’re really looking for signs of massive progress in the world of Doctor Who, then just compare the savvyness of Karen Gillen’s Amy Pond to the likes of Bonnie Langford’s ever-screeching Mel from the 80s.

It’s not, of course, just the angels that Moffat is bringing back here. He also re-introduces another of his creations, River Song. Back when we first met her, in the Silence In The Library/Forest Of The Dead two-parter (and just as we explored the universe’s biggest library in Silence, we get the biggest museum at the start of this episode), it was heavily implied that she was the Doctor’s wife. Here, it’s once more implied that may be the case, and Amy gets the job of quizzing the Doctor on the matter. Just when we think we might get a clue, though, Moffat pulls back, and we’re left to consider what’s said of River Song later.

For what is the truth about her? Why was she in prison? And why, if the Doctor works out who she is, will he not help her? Is she going to turn out to be The Rani or something? Why has she got a book on the angels and who wrote it? How come the homebox she sent back had Gallifreyan writing on it? Maybe we’ll get some answers next week, and find out what some of those “spoilers” actually are.

Eventually, River, the Doctor, Amy and a gang of clerics with big guns find themselves in a massive chamber, which seemingly looks set up for a big game of hide and seek. The problem? It’s full of stone statues, and one of them is an angel. That said, it didn’t take too long to twig that there was more to the other stone statues than originally met the eye, and sure enough, the fit truly hit the shan.

The sequences in this chamber, while they looked stunning, weren’t quite as tense and gripping at first as we might have hoped. That’s no slight on director Adam Smith, who does some fine work here, but perhaps another by-product of meeting the angels before. They only really become sinister again in this segment when the statues around are revealed for what they truly are.

Which brings us to the one logic gap that niggles slightly. The idea is that if you don’t blink, and are always looking at the angels, then they won’t move. But surely, in a chamber that big, there’s always going to be an angel in the dark somewhere, or one that can’t be seen? Or is that just us being a little picky?

While we weren’t convinced entirely by the idea of the angels finding a voice at first, it did give a nod of the head to one of the immense skills that Steven Moffat has. Before the Doctor finds out that he’s talking to Bob the Angel, he draws our attention to the clue that’s been living in the background for a good chunk of the episode: namely that the statues in the background have one head when they should have two. We love moments like that, and it’s hard to think of anyone better than Moffat at doing them.

Still, The Time Of Angels did peter out a little to a pretty underwhelming cliffhanger. That’s the old Who fan in us, yearning for imminent destruction for the Doctor to resolve in double quick time perhaps, but while the peril around them was clearly escalated, it did feel like quite a low key end to the episode. That said, it does hint that it’ll make good of the anger that the Doctor has been fused with these past few weeks, and it’ll be interesting to see if the taunts of the angels can have their desired effect.

And thus we arrive at perhaps the obvious conclusion. The Time Of Angels was another good episode of Doctor Who, in a series that – appreciating not everyone likes Victory Of The Daleks – has impressed right from the start of its current run. Was The Time Of Angels up there with the best of Steven Moffat? You’d have to say no, it wasn’t. Was it a very good way to spend 45 minutes on a Saturday night, and an even better way to lose chunks of the next week wondering who River Song is? Absolutely.

We’ll see you back here next week to see how all of this pans out...

Our review of last week's episode, Victory Of The Daleks, is here.

Check out the new and ever growing Doctor Who page at DoG, where we are marshalling all the Who content at the site, including interviews, DVD and episode reviews, lists, opinions and articles on our favourite time traveller...

 

Tags

Users Comments

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 4: The Time Of Angels review
Posted By Vaderwink 1 April 24, 2010 06:10:12 PM

Small point, but did we have to have a cartoon Graham Norton and a reminder of 'Over the Rainbow' coming up next?? Because once the episode was finished, we were told again! Good Who episode, though ...

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 4: The Time Of Angels review
Posted By 04BennettCH 1 April 24, 2010 06:20:48 PM

That was an ace episode, Amy Pond is quickly becoming my fav side kick. Also I thought the end was pretty dramatic, awesome monologue from Matt Smith had me in goose bumps. The only negative is that occasionally it is hard to actually hear what is being said over the music, although this is forgiveable considering it is a superb soundtrack. I know what im doing next Saturday!

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 4: The Time Of Angels review
Posted By paultheitguy@hotmail.co.uk 1 April 24, 2010 06:24:14 PM

Totally agree Vanderwink - it was drawing up to a fairly tense, Aliens-like moment when suddenly up popped cartoon Graham totally destroying the tension that had been slowly building up over 40 minutes. We all spent the next 2 minutes or so moaning at BBC One about it and it ruined the episode for us. I have complained to BBC and I urge everyone else to do the same to stop it happening again (remember when Who fans successfully got them to move the 'Next Time' to the end of the credits on part one of two parters after 'Aliens Of London' gave us a cliffhanger of the Doctor dying and then revealed instantly that he was OK next week...?)

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 4: The Time Of Angels review
Posted By MadProphet 1 April 24, 2010 06:28:59 PM

Over The Rainbow graphic aside, loved it. Aliens to Blink's Alien, indeed! River Song is a little grating tbh, but there's enough mystery that I'm still interested in her character. Loved the cliffhanger too, so much different to virtually every new series cliffhanger to date. Can't wait for next week.

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 4: The Time Of Angels review
Posted By mart6049 1 April 24, 2010 06:31:14 PM

Feel the need to complain about the Norton bit. Anyone else?

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 4: The Time Of Angels review
Posted By Lachesis 1 April 24, 2010 06:33:18 PM

Awesome episode imo, Matt Smith so much more relaxed than last week and the extra episode allows the story to breathe which really works tot he good imo....didn't notice Graham Norton showing up on hd (unless I erased it as I would like to him)...but its disgraceful if the BBC threw that into such a show..complain long and complain loud.

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 4: The Time Of Angels review
Posted By Doenutty 1 April 24, 2010 06:35:38 PM

Enjoyed the episode, especially the part with Amy and the Angel coming out of the screen, I think there was enough time dedicated to this part to build a good amount of tension. The bbc are always annoying with their 'whats next' ads, seriously, wait 2 minutes and then you can show it happily once the show finishes. I'm looking forward to seeing the next episode and maybe getting some more clues about River, intriguing character however I do find her annoying.

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 4: The Time Of Angels review
Posted By Grimr 1 April 24, 2010 06:57:04 PM

I have to say, the new Who works so much better when they're not trying to cram a full story into a brief 45 minutes. Matt Smith is also better in a longer story when he can relax and pace himself a bit better. I wish the BBC would restore the episodes of the next series to 50 minutes. It would work much better.

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 4: The Time Of Angels review
Posted By tombombadil66 1 April 24, 2010 06:59:31 PM

I too have complained to the BBC about the Graham Norton graphic. Whoever decided to put that in deserves a quiet word. That aside, another fine episode. I love it when the show uses good ideas and atmosphere to drive the plot rather than just glossy special effects. This felt compelling and quite creepy. Roll on next Saturday.

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 4: The Time Of Angels review
Posted By nphorton 1 April 24, 2010 07:04:01 PM

Agreed, an excellent monolgue at the end spoilt by an intrusive and horrible animated Graham Norton! Please complain to the BBC and it should hopefully be dropped.

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 4: The Time Of Angels review
Posted By SpiritMuse 1 April 24, 2010 07:10:15 PM

Really? Amy savvy? Alhough it was pretty clever how she defeated the Angel in the recording, she really shouldn't have been in that predicament to begin with. It's the first of two times in the episode that she failed to alert the Doctor (or anyone) that something was wrong, and got into real danger because of it. I felt she was handed the idiot ball this time around. I like her, but she really did a few very stupid things today. Other than that though, it was a good episode. I love the effect River Song has on the Doctor, very funny.

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 4: The Time Of Angels review
Posted By paultheitguy@hotmail.co.uk 1 April 24, 2010 07:15:17 PM

I tried to put this on Wikipedia, but someone keeps taking it down again... If you notice it gone, please repost... ===The 'Graham Norton Advert' Controversy=== During the closing minutes of the original BBC One broadcast, as tension was being built up to a cliffhanger, an advert appeared on screen for the next show [[Over the Rainbow (UK TV series)|Over the Rainbow]] which featured a cartoon version of [[Graham Norton]]. This caused mass outrage amongst fans who claimed that the tension had been completely deflated. The terms "Graham Norton" and "Doctor Who" temporarily became worldwide trends on [[Twitter]] immediately following the initial broadcast. Comedian [[Simon Pegg]] was one of the highest profile fans to mention the incident in his Tweets.

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 4: The Time Of Angels review
Posted By McCarthy 1 April 24, 2010 07:30:11 PM

Loved the episode, the frightening aspect of the Angels was truly met, for me, when they realise every statue is an angel and they all start moving/crawling toward them, brilliant! One fault though, if you noticed sand/dust pouring out of your eye, would you not say something? Silly Amy. Apart from that, loved it. Oh, and no awful Graham Norton stupidity on the iPlayer, I can report.

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 4: The Time Of Angels review
Posted By paulychilds 1 April 24, 2010 08:22:31 PM

Just got a 'Final Warning' from Wikipedia for my little addition (above). Someone really doesn't want it there. Can request that someone else post it back as I am banned from posting the phrase "Graham Norton" on Wikipedia now. Hard to believe isn't it?

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 4: The Time Of Angels review
Posted By redhead 1 April 24, 2010 08:28:17 PM

I live in american and cant watch the newest episodes!!Can someone please post a link!!!??? IM DESPERATE!!!! I NEEEED MY DOCTOR WHOOO!!

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 4: The Time Of Angels review
Posted By tiger2000 1 April 24, 2010 08:44:45 PM

The Wikipedia addition was removed because it was an opinion and not fact.

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 4: The Time Of Angels review
Posted By SpiritMuse 1 April 24, 2010 08:53:29 PM

@paulychilds They're probably not allowing it because it's a bit early in the day to be talking about "controversy" and "mass outrage". It might have been mentioned on Twitter quite a bit but that alone does not a mass outrage make. If the BBC get loads of complaints and the papers pick up on it, then you could start to call it a controversy. But at the moment we just can't be sure exactly how this will develop.

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 4: The Time Of Angels review
Posted By paultheitguy@hotmail.co.uk 1 April 24, 2010 09:07:18 PM

As long as it develops with no intrusive ads in the body of the show I will be happy.

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 4: The Time Of Angels review
Posted By StellarX 1 April 24, 2010 09:07:59 PM

Superb episode (nightmare Norton animation aside). Loved "The Eleventh Hour", "The Beast Below" was 'okay' - just tried to do too much with its time. "Victory of the Daleks" was a monumental disappointment - worst Dalek story since the reboot (sorry everyone but it's true). Return to form tonight in spades. Which makes the (soon to be notorious) Norton animation gaffe so appalling.

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 4: The Time Of Angels review
Posted By paulychilds 1 April 24, 2010 09:09:11 PM

ps Tiger2000 - not opinion. Pure fact. You can look at freely available Twitter trending figures to see that Doctor Who and Graham Norton were the most mentioned phrases WORLDWIDE for about an hour following the show.

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 4: The Time Of Angels review
Posted By StellarX 1 April 24, 2010 09:10:36 PM

PS - Regards the subsequent Wikipedia-Gate: It will be FACT rather than OPINION in less than 24 hrs.

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 4: The Time Of Angels review
Posted By StellarX 1 April 24, 2010 09:22:20 PM

AND ANOTHER THING: In this day of digital-TV flexibility, can we not press a button to "opt out" of such adverts, channel ident logos etc? Just because they do it in America, doesn't mean WE have to! TV companies even try to "con" those of us who record programmes and fast-fwd through the adverts - they insert programme previews and channel logos mid-stream in the ad breaks to trick us into pressing "play" prematurely. Of course, all this does is make the viewer even more "anti" the product concerned. Perhaps if this "opt out" button were available, TV companies would realize how much money, time and effort is being invested in these initiatives.

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 4: The Time Of Angels review
Posted By sigsig 1 April 24, 2010 09:23:31 PM

I thought that the angels who were in the dark or out of sight would not move, since they would be looking at each other in anything other than pitch darkness. Thus explaining why they don't attack until there is complete darkness. OR they were being cunning and waiting...

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 4: The Time Of Angels review
Posted By Jenni 1 April 24, 2010 09:32:32 PM

At last, the first decent episode of the series :) Even maybe warmed up to Matt Smith slightly!

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 4: The Time Of Angels review
Posted By paulychilds 1 April 24, 2010 09:34:11 PM

For those who missed it and are wondering what the fuss is all about, someone has loaded it up to Youtube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GspzbY1iYO8

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 4: The Time Of Angels review
Posted By DamonD 1 April 24, 2010 09:53:02 PM

Good episode. I'll wait on final verdict until the second part (I remember liking Daleks in Manhatten but then Evolution came along...)

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 4: The Time Of Angels review
Posted By CiaraK 1 April 24, 2010 10:10:58 PM

Not as good as 'Blink'...but only just. Those weeping angels scare the **** out of me...and I'm a middle-aged adult! Really intrigued as to River Song's story...she appears to be a bit of a baddie here, [possibly..."if he knew who I was, he wouldn't help me" "I don't want to go back to jail" (paraphrasing)]. On the other hand, that could be interpreted many ways, including (i) she's lying to the Military Cleric chap, for some reason, (ii) she's a 'different' River, in the same way that Amy inhabits a 'different' Earth that doesn't remember the Dalek invasion of last series, (iii)some 'wibbly-wobbly-time-thingy reason that means helping her NOW changes the course of summat-or-other...etc etc. She's obviously multi-talented, (hinting at a looong life of learning)...and can write Gallifreyan, (as mentioned in the review)...but that COULD be because the Doctor taught her it; but even so, her almost 'all-knowing' persona with respect to all things Doctor hint to someone with more than a human lifespan and/or knowledge of Timelords. Is she also a Time Lord, or someone in the employ of the Time Lords hunting down the renegade Doctor? ...or do I just think too much? ;p

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 4: The Time Of Angels review
Posted By monkeyaround92 1 April 24, 2010 10:26:07 PM

I must disagree with this opinion. I thought this episode was probably the best of the season. Episode one was good, episode two was on the same level as one, and three only slightly behind those (in my opinion). In Silence in the Library and Forest of the Dead, two episodes that I loved,I found river song to be irritating. In this episode, I thought that her character was able to impress me more. Standing alone, this episode was amazing, but next week will help me decide.

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 4: The Time Of Angels review
Posted By Angostura 1 April 24, 2010 10:40:43 PM

A fine episode, with a ropey cliff hanger. Notably for me, River Song wasn't the only thing that returned from the Library episodes as far as I was concerned. The Voice of Bob idea was very reminiscent of the traces of consciousness that kept the animated space suits talking in the earlier episode. Regarding Wikipedia - not a place to start a campaign, certainly not without using hard facts. The phrase "This caused mass outrage amongst fans who claimed that the tension had been completely deflated. " is clearly going to cause problems, you would have been better off saying it caused strong reaction amongst fans, generating X,000 tweets in 20 minutes, or somesuch.

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 4: The Time Of Angels review
Posted By explodingzebras 1 April 24, 2010 10:41:53 PM

Again aside from the Norton Graphic, a pretty good episode. Funny moment for me: when the two black army/priest dudes go it alone i thought "well their dead then!" and lo an behold, broken neck time! @MadProphet 1: Agreed i do find River Song rather grating!

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 4: The Time Of Angels review
Posted By library_guy 1 April 24, 2010 11:41:20 PM

Loving this series so far, even Victory of the Daleks I found to be a good ol' Who romp (although I thought Churchill was a bit too comedy). Was a really nice touch building on the fact that the Doctor's tardis-flying skills have somewhat to be desired in "leaving the brakes on" to get the wooshy, wooshy noise - very Troughton. (Also thought Smith did a pretty good job imitating the tardis!)

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 4: The Time Of Angels review
Posted By revolution 1 April 25, 2010 12:23:43 AM

After the disappointing victory of the new power ranger daleks... thankfully doctor who returns to form and we see both the return of the intriguing River Song and the weeping angels. Matt Smith is easing ever more comfortably into the doctor and should be congratulated as such. Amy Pond continues to grow strong as a companion however in this episode her performance and indeed character was somewhat mixed. This is very much to quote Moffat himself, the equivalent of Aliens to the original Alien. The scene with Amy stuck watching the Angel creep out the image itself was scary and smart stuff - homage and influence right from the ring there. The cliffhanger was pretty meh... but the teasers for next week look darn exciting - pretty much unleashing the Angels in full force and furthering this continuing universe is cracked theme. Im certain next week will deliver a satisfying conclusion to what appears to be one of the strongest Doctor who seasons yet. btw the sheer disrespect shown by the powers that be about unleashing that Graham Norton graphic before the end of the show should be something the bbc should be wary about. This sort of careless attitude alongside the crazy budgetary cuts to what is surely one of their most iconic brand shows smacks of stupidity.

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 4: The Time Of Angels review
Posted By gakirin 1 April 25, 2010 03:32:27 AM

I just don't like the name "River Song". Sounds like a hippie compound name.

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 4: The Time Of Angels review
Posted By Headache2112 1 April 25, 2010 05:57:10 AM

A fantastic teaser with the Doctor and Amy discovering the Home Box in the museum, while River Song etches Old Gallifreyan text into it 12,000 years earlier. That is Moffat being brilliant, that is! A terrific episode with lots of great moments. Matt Smith seemed much more comfortable as the Doctor in this episode, though, it was one of the first filmed, wasn't it? (Not certain.) Great stuff with the Angel jumping out of the monitor screen and Amy getting her pause on it. One thing I don't get: I thought the Angels made their victims "live their lives to death". Why did the Angel snap the necks of the soldiers? Shouldn't the Angel have zapped the soldiers' life force, sending them to live in the past like what happened to the victims in "Blink"? I'm a bit confused there. Lots of fun stuff with River, and "Mr. Grumpy Face" was hysterical! "Flesh and Stone" is less than 168 hours away! I can't wait!

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 4: The Time Of Angels review
Posted By FonceFalooda 1 April 25, 2010 06:09:47 AM

Fine episode. Didn't like it quite as much as I think I should have, possibly because I'm still upset about last week, but I'll get over that. - What I'm really worried about is the episode AFTER next week's, the next episode that's not written by Moffat himself. That'll show whether "Victory" was a once off catastrophe, or whether the man has no skill at all in leading a team of other writers. We know he can write incredibly well on his own, but maybe he can't fix someone else's script to save his life. We'll see!

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 4: The Time Of Angels review
Posted By Swarley 1 April 25, 2010 07:35:08 AM

great episode, the first few eps this season have genuinely made me ask david who? when refering to the doctor. the one thing I don't actually get is why people are questioning why the angels didn't attack, did the doctor not explain that they were too weak to move as they had been down in the caves too long? I just assumed that was the reason and thought nothing of it. The other thing that’s not necessarily a bad thing but, didn’t this episode feel a lot like silence in the library? I mean hiding away from darkness, the ghosting on the radio, not to mention river song leading a small team of this time clerics getting picked off one by one. Still I think it was just different enough to become a great beginning to a two parter. can't wait for next week.

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 4: The Time Of Angels review
Posted By Viridis 1 April 25, 2010 09:38:31 AM

awesome, awesome episode in which ever element worked, every character and every twist and so many questions to be answered. I love the hint suggesting Angels might be something else entirely, dreams or ideas run amock, abstract forms, when you close your eyes. When you open them they're trapped in the Angel form, locked in stone. Steven Moffat is brilliant and the best man for the job of running Doctor Who. Matt Smith is the discovery of a lifetime. He IS the Doctor. But who is River Song? And bless Amy, she's an angel...

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 4: The Time Of Angels review
Posted By Vogonsrock 1 April 25, 2010 09:49:19 AM

Great episode that's allayed my fears of Dr Who becoming Dr Who Lite after last weeks episode. I liked the use of Angel Bob and Matt Smith seemed to carry off 'commanding' better than he has previously. One thing I am a bit wary of is that Dr Who is in danger of being renamed Amy Pond, the series so far seem to be concentrating heavily on the female roles, to the extent that it's changing the dynamic of his character as he seems to become increasingly pussy whipped. I like Amy and the fact that she's ballsy and capable, and the chemsitry between the Dr and the women is great, but can he be the one who comes up with the solution this time.. pretty please.

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 4: The Time Of Angels review
Posted By HampsteadNick 1 April 25, 2010 11:05:29 AM

if u want to send a verbal complaint, i have just called the BBC and spoke to a real person in the complaints dept, as satisfying as an email is it was nice to air my views vocally... 03700 100 222

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 4: The Time Of Angels review
Posted By johng79 1 April 25, 2010 11:37:48 AM

Maybe the angel snapped the three squaddies by snapping their necks rather than time-flushing them so that it could more easily adopt their trace consciousnesses and use them as a lure for the others - and a way to communicate with the Doctor? Just an idea. I loved this episode - my favourite so far. The Norton animation thing was such a ludicrous misjudgement on the BBC's part that it's almost funny. I've sent my complaint.

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 4: The Time Of Angels review
Posted By johng79 1 April 25, 2010 11:38:38 AM

I meant "killed" rather than snapped!

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 4: The Time Of Angels review
Posted By HampsteadNick 1 April 25, 2010 11:47:43 AM

It was stated about why they were killed and not zapped into the past, the doctor said "unless they need the bodies for something" or along those lines

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 4: The Time Of Angels review
Posted By flaysomewench 1 April 25, 2010 12:16:02 PM

Is nobody else freaked out aboutt the fact that Amy Pond does not remember the Daleks and also is a lot smarter than she probably should be? That's three episodes in a row where she has solved things that eluded the Doctor. Alarm bells anyone? And the niggle about angels in the dark unseen - They'd become visible when up close, surely? Good review though, and I thoroughly enjoyed the episode although I wasn't expecting the "To be continued..." RAGE!!!

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 4: The Time Of Angels review
Posted By HuwOS 1 April 25, 2010 12:33:12 PM

Matt Smith and Karen Gillan give excellent performances but for me this was a prime example of everything that's worst about the revived Doctor Who series. The relationship between two people who barely know each other for a few days is too far advanced to bear any comparison to how real relationships happen, that would be the Doctor and Amy. River Song is an irritation beyond compare and to the attitudes given by both female characters the Doctor gets to respond with petulance and pouting. Some people may find that appealing, but if that is anyone's idea of an ancient timelord it is not mine, for me that can never be the doctor. Then not only the doctor but everyone else gets to be utter morons when despite the doctor laying out that the now extinct race who created the temple had two heads, neither he nor anyone else realises for an unutterably long time that none of the statues supposedly created by this race have only one head each, despite it being the immediate comment presumably made by every viewer the second that information was made available to them. Never mind the problem with a multi level building full of angels who can only move when not being observed given that the vast majority of them are therefore free to move the entire time and it all comes across as a horribly ill thought out mess where terribly false relationships have been considered vastly more important than coherent story telling. I stopped watching Dr Who in the awful, irredeemable Sylvester McCoy years and have been watching the revival which has been gifted with incredible and wonderfully talented Doctors and some kind of budget but who are woefully let down by this fixation with pseudo relationships above all else. As it seems unlikely now that this will improve, this will probably be the last series I watch. It's disappointing to say the very least.

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 4: The Time Of Angels review
Posted By Dierk 1 April 25, 2010 12:43:10 PM

Good one. Minor niggle: [Horror] Monsters should not be fleshed out as they simply lose impact. I do fear a bit for future Moffat stories - and I am a huge fan of his writing! - since he relies a bit too much on remixing SF-/Horror classics and rehashing his own stories. For instance this time we had Star Wars [again], Aliens, Douglas Adams [though rather subtly, granted], the mentioned Japanese film. I was also strongly reminded of Moffat's own Library double feature. ... As for the Angels in the caves, it was mentioned by the Doctor how they are weak, nearly starved to death, for being millennia in the darkness without prey.

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 4: The Time Of Angels review
Posted By blueoyster101 1 April 25, 2010 03:45:17 PM

Got to agree with 04BennettCH, whoever's mixing the sound on this show has got cloth ears! Oh and please everyone, I don't know if you can still "swamp the switchboard" at the BBC, but have a go! The number's 03700100222. Whoever's in charge of links and continuity at the Beeb needs hanging out to dry.

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 4: The Time Of Angels review
Posted By moorish 1 April 25, 2010 03:56:38 PM

Great episode - absolutely naff cliffhanger though. Even without Graham Norton capering all over it.

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 4: The Time Of Angels review
Posted By Liv123 1 April 25, 2010 03:59:45 PM

I thought this was a great episode and the weeping angels were still very scary I thought. Mostly I'm so pleased I wasn't the only person howling at the screen when the beeb put that RIDICULOUS Graham Norton thing on during the tense ending. Totally totally out of order and I will also be complaining.

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 4: The Time Of Angels review
Posted By Liv123 1 April 25, 2010 04:01:50 PM

Really pleased to note I wasn't the only person howling at the tv when that RIDICULOUS Graham Norton cartoon popped up during a very tense moment - Really awful and I will definitely also be complaining. The Weeping Angels are still very scary to me and I thought this was a very good episode, very 'on form' I felt.

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 4: The Time Of Angels review
Posted By nkbabzy 1 April 25, 2010 07:58:52 PM

maybe she's the Doctors Daughter? just saying

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 4: The Time Of Angels review
Posted By FonceFalooda 1 April 25, 2010 08:22:55 PM

His daughter, huh? That's just crazy enough to be canon! ;) It makes sense from a logistic, "how do we film the episodes thatwe keep teasing" standpoint... Eventually Ms. Moffett will start showing up instead of River, and after several episodes, it'll be revealed that she's keeping a diary... Nice one Babzy! Mystery solved! :)

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 4: The Time Of Angels review
Posted By mirecraic 1 April 25, 2010 09:10:01 PM

Note to self: Do not watch Steven Moffat episodes alone before bed. Very bad idea.

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 4: The Time Of Angels review
Posted By cheechwiz 1 April 26, 2010 02:02:25 AM

You know? I really didn't want to like Matt Smith as the Doctor. I was underwhelmed with the first episode, and then I realised that we had the end of the last ep. Series 1(2005) and a Christmas special to get used to David Tennant after Christopher Eccleston's brilliant reintroduction to the character. 'Victory of the Daleks' actually got me excited it not only had SPITFIRES IN SPACE FOR GOD'S SAKE!!!! *ahem*...sorry...It also introduced the underlying theme for this series; the fact that all is not right with the universe. I for one am on tenterhooks to find out what has gone wrong. Loved 'The Time of Angels', I can't wait for next week and *Hurrah* for Matt Smith for winning me over.

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 4: The Time Of Angels review
Posted By Shilling 1 April 26, 2010 09:51:37 AM

I like the angels, but I think they would be a lot better without the goofy monster-face when they attack. The sad face is a lot scarier.

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 4: The Time Of Angels review
Posted By Thunderball 1 April 26, 2010 10:01:38 AM

I’m fairly surprised by this low key review! I think this was Moffat at his best. Ok, we have seen the angels before so knew what to expect, but Amy hadn’t, therefore we were reliving the fear through her. This was an exceptional episode, the best this series and I believe the best since Blink. This was Doctor Who as it should be. My daughter watched peeking through her fingers. Too scared to look but too enthralled to look away….very much like the theme of the episode itself, which reminded me of my younger self back in the very early eighties. I’m hoping that next week keeps the tension going and allows the series to remain ‘darker’ for the rest of this series. This episode proved one thing though. That by having time to create tension and having moments to breath brings out the best in the writing, the direction and the acting and suggests Doctor Who going forward will benefit more from the cliff-hanger ending of old Who.

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 4: The Time Of Angels review
Posted By Thunderball 1 April 26, 2010 10:19:57 AM

The tension was unbearable. Just imagine, you are stuck in a dark cave with danger all around…..and up pops Graham Norton. AAAAAARRRGGGGHHHHH!

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 4: The Time Of Angels review
Posted By blat210 1 April 26, 2010 12:12:59 PM

Right, getting a bit concerned now. New assistant, tick New Tardis, tick Daleks, tick Weeping Angels, tick River bloody song, tick Cybermen soon, tick Sorry to trouble you Mr Moffat, but any chance of something sort of, how shall I put this, new? Or is the new series going to be like Mondays dinner, warmed up stuff we have already seen? Dont get me wrong, it isnt bad, neither are fried up spuds, but its looking a bit, well, unoriginal to me. If you cant think of anything new, then why not look a bit further back than the last series?

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 4: The Time Of Angels review
Posted By TheLensOfTruth77 1 April 26, 2010 06:08:25 PM

Well blat210, you've already by your own omission got a New Tardis and a New assistant and i think i saw a New Dr in there somewhere too :)

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 4: The Time Of Angels review
Posted By TheLensOfTruth77 1 April 26, 2010 06:09:36 PM

*admission :)

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 4: The Time Of Angels review
Posted By cheechwiz 1 April 26, 2010 07:17:13 PM

blat210: Yes...but...SPITFIRES IN FRIGGIN' SPACE!!!!!!!

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 4: The Time Of Angels review
Posted By Mazie 1 April 26, 2010 09:07:17 PM

Just watched it now, what was that incredibly annoying sound effect every time a torch beam moved?! Seriously, what are the fx and sound guys up to these days?

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 4: The Time Of Angels review
Posted By Mawson 1 April 26, 2010 09:41:14 PM

Good episode. I enjoyed this and won't mention the Norton thing, I've nothing more to add to the travesty. I thought this was a well written and well paced piece. Great stuff. However, the sound was off again (not the first episode of the new season with this issue) at many times it was near impossible to hear the dialogue.

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 4: The Time Of Angels review
Posted By Rob_H 1 April 26, 2010 09:47:25 PM

@ HuwOS - the Angels cannot move when they can see each other. When there's a light source in the room, they can see each other, even if there's no human looking at them. Presumably, the ones in the unoccupied levels can and are moving the entire time. Also, I didn't pick up on the fact that the statues had two heads, and I consider myself a relatively observant type. Thirdly, there's no indication of how much time has elapsed between Victory of the Daleks and Time of Angels; there may have been weeks inbetween from the Doctor and Amy's point of view. If you seek nits to pick, then nits you will find.

Re: Doctor Who series 5 episode 4: The Time Of Angels review
Posted By junegrape 1 May 17, 2010 05:21:48 PM

Overall, I liked this episode. It was strong enough to make the 11th Doctor genuinely appeal to me for the first time - especially the bit where he imitates the sound of the TARDIS landing - loved it, really funny. The story itself was also the first that didn't leave me with a total feeling of "meh." Chief quibble: Amy Pond - why is there seemingly a mandatory 5-8 second delay for her to follow the Doctor's instructions? Count it - the Doctor says "Run, Amy, run!" She'll stand there, or say something absolutely silly under the circumstances, or just go ahead and do the exact opposite of what the Doctor is screaming at her to do in order to save her life. Case in point - "My hand is stone/you bit me with alien teeth!" Others in the group have already been killed, and the angels are upon her and the Doctor, but she's standing there going on about the Doctor biting her in order to save her life. Lastly, I love the character of River Song; loved the opening sequence -- although seriously - is Moffat giving us too much information in that he seems to derive pleasure from dressing women in long flowing black fabric and spike heels (The Queen in The Beast Below wore a similar outfit). Admittedly, the second part of the story at times almost succeeded in bringing me to the edge of "meh," but nothing's perfect.
Post a Comment
Security Code* Get another image
 
 
Doctor Who series 5: Time Of Angels

Doctor Who: The Time Of Angels

Untitled Document

Follow Den of Geek on

Related Articles

SEARCH

Coke Zero
Advertisement