Den of Geek

Lost season 6 episodes 1 and 2 review

James Hunt


Lost returns for its final season, and James for one is very glad to see it. Here he checks out the season's opener, LA X...

Published on Feb 4, 2010


6.1-2 LA X: Parts 1 and 2

More than most TV shows, Lost has been defined by its structure, dedicating itself to telling parallel, intertwined stories. First, we had three seasons where each episode contained flashbacks. Then, a season's worth of flash-forwards. Then one which had flashbacks, forwards, and on at least one occasion, we had both in the same episode. For Season 6, one of the burning questions was related to exactly this matter. Where was there left to go?

Well... how about flash-sideways?

Yes, apparently the gimmick for this season is a dual-timeline setup, exploring what the lives of the Losties might have been like had 815 not crashed. Of course, we all know that things won't be that simple, and from Juliet's death came the suggestion that the two timelines aren't quite as separate as they're being presented, and there's a fair chance that Jack's missing father is a major symptom of that. And was Charlie's "I'm supposed to be dead" a statement with a knowing double-meaning? One thing is certain - it's not a matter of if these two timelines interact, simply a matter of when and how.

Traditionally, Lost likes to use its significant episodes - openers, season breaks, season finales - to treat its viewers to a rug-pulling, eye-popping twist that makes it seem as though the room has just depressurised and everything's suddenly being sucked out the door. However, this time, there was none of that. Despite being a two-parter, the events of the episode were strangely muted, favouring a rhythmic, building sense of disorientation and confusion to a single moment of brain-exploding clarity. Indeed, although the twists came thick and fast, many were delivered with an almost pedestrian air - Desmond on the plane, ‘Locke' being the Smoke Monster - they were so understated they almost slipped past unnoticed.

As a season opener, it wasn't perfect. The lack of any big single game-changing twist left it feeling a little too much like simply the next episode in the saga, rather than the start of the sprint towards the finish line. It was the CGI that fell majorly short, though. It's almost hard to believe that a show offering such poor ‘sunken island' CGI and dodgy smoke monster effects is the same one whose pilot was touted for being the most expensive ever.

Certain elements of the flash-sideways were also hard to believe. Shannon's absence, although explained, still seems conspicuous, like it was motivated more by contract wrangling than story reasons. Why didn't Jack remember Desmond, given how quickly the realisation came when they were on the island together? And try as they might, all the makeup in the world isn't going to make the cast look like they did in Season 1, particularly in Claire's case.

On the plus side, we were introduced to a new bunch of enigmatic and compelling characters. A haughty Japanese man named Dogen and his interpreter, John Lennon. Well, apparently he's not called that. He's just "Lennon". Will either be the next Eko/Daniel/Desmond in terms of going from antagonist to fan favourite over the course of a season? Time will tell on that one.

At least the old stalwart, John Locke, was able to bring the goods, as Terry O'Quinn gave the kind of subtle, nuanced performance that shows why he's been placed at the heart of Lost. Deeply threatening and malevolent in one scene, genial and meek in the next.

However, as good as the big, sweeping elements were, it was the small details that made this episode great. For Lost obsessives (and, let's face it, aren't we all at this point?) there were tonnes of easter eggs: the return of Frogurt, Arzt, and Hurley's Chicken Advert, for example. The subtle indications that the alternate timeline might not be quite as similar to the original as it seems (Was Locke lying? Or did he really manage to go on his ‘walkabout' in this timeline?) As usual, the details are what make even the most pedestrian scene into something worth obsessing over.

So, if I had to review this episode in one line, it'd be, "There's a lot to process." To tell the truth, it seems as though there are more questions than ever that need answering, but at the same time, we're tantalisingly close to finding out the secrets of Ol' Smokey. Let's just hope the Lost writers have learnt from the reaction to Battlestar Galactica's ending...

 

Tags

Users Comments

Re: Lost season 6 episodes 1 and 2 review
Posted By stuxmusic 1 February 4, 2010 10:17:42 AM

And what reaction is that? I loved how BSG ended.

Re: Lost season 6 episodes 1 and 2 review
Posted By blindfold11 1 February 4, 2010 12:28:23 PM

Yeah BSG is even better second time round. Yes the Shannon thing was very suspect - But with these minor alterations - it is therefore suggesting that Blowing up the whatsit prevented Desmond from going there, and somehow prevented Shannon from ever getting on the plane with Boone...??? As for the new characters. I think the lennon guy looks more like a starved Weird Al Yankovic.

Re: Lost season 6 episodes 1 and 2 review
Posted By gudge 1 February 4, 2010 01:38:47 PM

Lennon is the Clerk from the beginning of From Dusk Til Dawn. Fun fact. James, just to explain why Desmond and Jack didnt recall their meeting: the island wouldnt have been about, so Eloise would have never told Desmond to not marry Penny and he wouldnt have been training for the race in the first place. History is obviously very different. But, I do think Jack is in on it. As is Charlie ("I was supposed to die!"). Agreed that the underwater CGI was guff, but the quality wasnt the point - you know what the goal was.

Re: Lost season 6 episodes 1 and 2 review
Posted By DeanLearner 1 February 4, 2010 05:07:28 PM

I loved the episode and agree with your general sentiment, but there are a few points I really can't agree with you upon. Firstly, I don't think you can call the flashback/forwards etc a 'gimmick' anymore. They may have come across this way in the early seasons, however as the show has progressed, the concept has become an integral part of the main themes, (see 'The Constant' in particular). Secondly, to moan about somewhat ropey CGI is a bit tiresome really. Yes of course it's no Avatar, but then this is TV. We should be grateful that the producers have been given the money and freedom to finish telling their story as they wish.

Re: Lost season 6 episodes 1 and 2 review
Posted By bobsuncorp 1 February 4, 2010 10:02:22 PM

With regard to Locke, he can't have gone on the walkabout because his inability to go was the reason he was on 815 in the first place, he took an earlier flight. I did wonder at first though whether he was uninjured, I was expecting his conversation with Boone to end with him getting up to use the bathroom.

Re: Lost season 6 episodes 1 and 2 review
Posted By pete3206 1 February 4, 2010 11:11:27 PM

Just like previous seasons, nothing it what it seems. The assumption is an alternate timeline, but I expect that the viewers are being toyed with. Jack clearly experienced deja vu several times in the flight scenes. He recognised Desmond because he met him at the stadium in season 2. Desmond has a very important part to play in the story and it's looks like he was on 815 for a specific reason. Another thing about Jack, I love the way he looked at himself in the mirror in the toilet. He seemed to recognise the fact that he had aged and then he found a cut on his neck. Spooky!

Re: Lost season 6 episodes 1 and 2 review
Posted By capt_1ntens0 1 February 5, 2010 11:26:26 PM

Why does this read like a review of just episode 1 when its titled episodes 1 & 2? No mention of any of the craziness of episode 2- temple, springs of eternal life/resurrection, Sayid coming back from dead- none of this worth a mention or discussion? Enjoyed it thoroughly- just so great to have it back messing with my mind for another 17 glorious weeks. Hope they up the budget on the CGI though cos I agree, the underwater bit wasn't just sub-par for TV, it was sub-par for an Xbox game cut scene!

Re: Lost season 6 episodes 1 and 2 review
Posted By pete3206 1 February 6, 2010 12:38:31 AM

Who cares about the CGI? The underwater bit was OK IMO anyway.

Re: Lost season 6 episodes 1 and 2 review
Posted By Omniaural 1 February 6, 2010 10:03:26 AM

A great lost opening, but not in the usual sense. This episode was great by getting a lot of the 'elephants in the room' out of the way and leaving you wondering 'if we know that now, what's left to tell?'. Locke is still very dead, We know the fate of the island itself is in the balance, Hurley's connection to the island is even more prominent, Jack's real purpose is even more mystifying as everything seems to go wrong for him, no matter how good his intention. Obviously we know they aren't going to answer everything but as long as they bring closure to the stories of the central cast I don't mind if they leave some of the island mysteries forever unresolved.

Re: Lost season 6 episodes 1 and 2 review
Posted By misterjingo 1 February 8, 2010 10:03:29 AM

Isn't it possible that the "flash" sections are not an alternative universe, but the ultimate destination of the lost-ees? It wouldn't surprise me if they reset the time line in this current season, yet something is not quite right (as shown by Jack), and so he initialises something that will result in the crash of the first season - or something similar. Whilst I enjoyed the episodes, I'm a bit worried about where they are taking things. Lost has always kept it's feet within reality (more sci-fi-esque quantum phenomena), but now it appears to be wandering into mystical territory; the problem with that is anything can be explained with some woo-woo "logic". I'm also disappointed with the revelation that Jacobs brother is the smoke monster. Interviews with the producers from earlier series stated that the monster was a kind of security system. The latest reveal doesn't really follow that, which suggests they are piecing things together to make them fit. I'll watch to see how it pans out, but I have a feeling it will be at the expense of the mythos they've built over the past 5 series.

Re: Lost season 6 episodes 1 and 2 review
Posted By cerveloguy 1 February 9, 2010 10:06:00 AM

I also agree that BSG's ending was perfectly ok. I have not seen this Lost 6 stuff, so can't commnent.
Post a Comment
Security Code* Get another image
 
 
Lost: LA X: Parts 1 and 2

Lost: LA X: Parts 1 and 2

Untitled Document

Follow Den of Geek on

Related Articles

SEARCH

Coke Zero
Advertisement