Den of Geek

Survivors series 2 episode 2 review

Robert McLaughlin


There's a genuinely shocking moment in the second episode of Survivors. Rob - in his spoiler-filled review - explains more...

Published on Jan 27, 2010

With the status quo set up two weeks' ago (and after the BBC decided that football is more important that good drama, forcing us to wait longer for this second episode) we start things off with Naj tagging the city (yup, its Brum again) with 'Abby' signs, trying as hard as he can to get his family back together by having banners, cars, buildings and as many surfaces as possible scrawled with her name and arrows for her to follow to get her back in the fold.

With the intention of reuniting with her, at the other end of the spectrum Greg is trying his hardest to get rid of Tom, stating that his casual use of violence, his demeanour and his general outlook is endangering everyone, especially the fact that he is constantly waving a shotgun around. It seems there can only be one 'alpha-male' in the group and Greg, who is still reeling from his wound last week, still has the firmness of will to force Tom to leave. And while this is only temporary, it shows that Greg is really the de-facto leader of the family.

With Tom cast out, his lone wolf instinct kicks in, using his weapon to hijack and take hostage another group, stealing all their food. While this seems a little harsh and a little extreme (there is still lots of food available, the infection has only been around month or so), this standoff really is more of a catalyst for things later in the episode and for a much more sinister and, frankly, quite horrific use of 'extras'.

After the raid, the group Tom has taken hostage is again attacked by the storm troopers working for Whitaker, being hauled off into a van and driven off. Which you would think would be all blacked out and cool, but nope, the vans the storm troopers drive are white (with, I suspect, a copy of The Sun on the dashboard) and conveniently have the name of the pharmaceutical company they work for emblazoned on the front.

Seeing the attack, Tom returns back to his family, stating that he now has some idea of where Abby is, splitting the group as to a course of action. Should they rescue her or flee the city? On the insistence of Naj, the majority vote for a rescue, with only Greg staying behind, both to look after Naj and to load up the cars for a quick getaway when they return.

While the setup and current story for the family is actually quite compelling, with fractions, loyalties and secrets all piling up, the most important and, frankly, quite shocking plot lies with Abby, whose predicament is far from comfy.

Still locked away in the secret compound, the agreement to have some 'tests' done on her for a cure to the virus soon proves to be a very bad idea as the tests get progressively worse, ending up with her being injected with the virus in an attempt to create antibodies. Alone in the isolation cell, Abby once more succumbs to the virus and, while her predicament is bad, there are people in the base who, shockingly, have it worse.

Last week we saw that Whittaker had smuggled his family onto the base, storing them away in a bunker, spinning his wife a set of lies that here, safe away from the virus and the chaos outside, they can live happily until the worst is over. Deceiving her at every turn and making out that it's for her own good, Whittaker leaves them for days on end and eventually, being sick of the cramped conditions, his wife 'escapes', finding that outside is a lot worse than she thought, and that the base they are on is more of a nightmare than the outside world.

In one of the most shocking things I have seen in a while, in her wandering around the corridors she comes across some doors which when opened reveal people, herded like cattle, pawing at the window to escape.

With the use of only a bright spotlight, the scene of the pallid faces stuck in an unknown room is the stuff of nightmares and when she too ends up like them in 'quarantine' and the door slowly closes on her, her fate and the fate of the rest of the guests can be only guessed at.

However, recovering from the virus, Abby, with the assistance of Whittaker's wife, who is horrified at what she has seen, manages to make an escape, fleeing the compound in panic but , with thanks to Naj, slowly works her way home back to her adopted family.

Still, not everyone gets a reunion or happy ending as while Abby escapes, Whittaker's wife is imprisoned for helping her (after she finds there is nobody alive outside and she has been lied to for months). We find that the hypocritical doctor, while he smuggled his wife and child to safety, his co-workers were told to ignore or give false advise to dying friends and relatives, all, it seems, for the 'greater good'.

Reunited and happy the team leave the city with the ever-positive Naj being the bolstering influence on everyone, not wanting to give up on Abby and seeing the group together again (not to mention making a new friend with the other groups youngest member). And after a final altercation with this other group, and Tom getting a rightful and justified kicking for stealing from them, the survivors are ready to move on and try to start their lives again in the country.

Again, I found this a top-notch episode with the right balance of characters, drama and action. It seems the series is going from strength to strength with the shades of grey and ambiguity of characters really being the driving force. With no single ‘baddie' (well, apart from the mysterious man Whittaker reports to), the idea that every character has their own motivation, ideas and morals makes the series really solid and one the most polished and well executed sci-fi dramas currently on.

Check out our review of the series opener here.

 

Tags

Users Comments

Re: Survivors series 2 episode 2 review
Posted By cordas2 1 January 28, 2010 02:06:07 PM

'makes the series really solid and one the most polished and well executed sci-fi dramas currently on.' - Really? This falls far short of Being Human and Caprica the only other Sci Fi shows on at the moment. Sorry but I thought this episode was utter dross! The scriptwriting is lazy in the extreme, the plots are pretty much farcical and most of the characters have all the emotional depth of a cardboard cut out. The show has all the moral ambiguity of a wet sock (yes that is more than most TV)... Characters act in illogical manners to progress pointless plots that in turn rely on pointless plots points to exist. (damn I want some page breaks!!!) Take the whole 'guns are bad' vibe, apparently Tom shooting the man that shot Greg caused Greg to be shot... rather than the reality that Tom actually saved Greg's (and possibly other members of the groups lives), Toms carrying of a weapon also apparently 'draws trouble' like having a mad woman (living on the 23rd floor of an office block for months, with probably no water or food) attack/threaten the group with a knife, just so he could conveniently save Anya, so she could lecture him on 'guns bad'. We also have groups of people who will kneel before the gun 1 second and then chase the same armed man with the gun seconds later, before deciding to launch an assault on the refuge of the armed man armed with nothing... What were they going to do when they confronted the armed man? Oh thats right the one time he was likely to need a weapon (coming back to the compound to find signs of trouble) he leaves it behind in the Land Rover, just so Anya can use the gun to save him... before then pointing out that it wasn't loaded.... *YAWN* This isn't morally ambiguous, it isn't a well plotted morality question regarding the use of weapons and force in a lawless society... its just writer monkeys wanking over a script trying to point out that weapons are bad... Weapons are morally neutral, its the people who use them who are good or bad, its the choices they make that are important. This episode was full of logic holes and stupidity... Like how and WHY did a fox decide to climb 10 flights of stairs, getting passed closed doors to wake Al so he could stop Sara's revenge mission (the scene between the 2 of them on the stairs was brilliant)? Why is Abby such a retard? Why didn't she get some clothes when she broke into the house to steal the car keys... did she at no point think SHOES... maybe helpful when trying to run away from bad guys... How long is a rucksack of food going to last half a dozen people? What happened to the hundreds (maybe thousands or even hundreds of thousands) of tons of tinned and dried food in the city? How come Anya didn't think of breaking into a shop to steal hundreds of packs of cigs? Why does the secret lab have miles of un-patrolled, watched passages? Why wasn't Abby who has already been helped to escape once not kept under constant observation (her being the most important person on planet to them)? Why are they rounding up survivors in the 1st place? Why are they then putting them into rooms in groups? Why when they rounded up the lot from the pub did they keep the leader and let the rest go free? Why do I feel that none of these questions have been thought about or asked by those responsible for producing the show?

Re: Survivors series 2 episode 2 review
Posted By Robmac 1 January 28, 2010 03:31:02 PM

In comparison to say the writing of Merlin though its Shakespeare! Honestly I didnt think it was that bad, its mainstream BBC drama with a hint of Sci-Fi. Both Caprica (which always for some reason i read as Capri-sun) and Being Human are perfect genre telly and probably some of the best shows on television at the moment, but Survivors I think is as good as we are going to get on mainstream BBC as far as genre telly goes, unless of course they decide to bring back Blake 7. Actually the bloke who plays Whittaker would make quite a convincing Avon...hmmmm

Re: Survivors series 2 episode 2 review
Posted By cordas2 1 January 28, 2010 04:12:24 PM

Well comparing it to Merlin ain't high praise ;-) I just think that this episode was particularly weak. Yes maybe it is the best we can expect from the BBC but that doesn't mean we can't demand better... Personally I think the Beeb needs to take a good long hard look at Channel 4 which over the last few years has produced a number of great 'mainstream' dramas that are in a different universe when compared to Auntie's output.

Re: Survivors series 2 episode 2 review
Posted By orac 1 January 31, 2010 09:49:20 AM

I think your all being a little too harsh. 'Survivors' is is a really good Beeb effort compared to their usual drama output. It has a great cast with mostly fine performances. 'Being Human' is terrific and can take more risks as it's on the usually dire 'yoof' channel BBC-3. I'm not sure of it would find a bigger audience on Beeb One. Pointless knocking 'Merlin' too which has done a fine job of catering to the trick 'family' audience. I'm not one to usually support Beeb drama (I do prefer the likes of Dexter, Battlestar, Supernatural etc), but I do think that the Beeb has improved somewhat since the return of Dr Who in 2005.

Re: Survivors series 2 episode 2 review
Posted By Omniaural 1 February 1, 2010 06:29:36 PM

I think Survivors is one of the Beebs, better efforts. ust compare it to the recent Day of the Triffids which handles a similar scenario. Whilst both are passable for the average viewer I think Survivors does well at hitting the beats of sci-fi TV. Its got a good focus on character as opposed to obsessing over the plots, although the central conceit is more to the foreground this series. I was worried they'd contrive some way out device to get the gang to rescue Abby and they successfully tricked me into believing they had until the last moment. Those moments show they are at least trying to play with the audiences expectations rather than throwing out cliche ridden claptrap. For a lot of the regular audience the cliche's have to be established before they can be successfully broken. I want to know what happens now that Abby is free and the streets are not safe. Is this what leads them back to the community they first left behind last series?

Re: Survivors series 2 episode 2 review
Posted By capt_1ntens0 1 February 4, 2010 07:45:20 PM

Cordas I think we pretty much disagree on everything, so yep- you're wrong on this one. Its not Shakespeare, fine, but as another poster said the BBC really do seem to be trying with this and quite frankly it makes a change to be thoroughly entertained by a BRITISH sci fi show. We are in a golden age of TV at the mo (I counted 12 shows I cannot wait to see not even counting box sets recently, the most I've ever known) and Survivors deserves to be supported.

Re: Survivors series 2 episode 2 review
Posted By capt_1ntens0 1 February 4, 2010 07:45:45 PM

That being said- that was one SERIOUSLY lost fox...
Post a Comment
Security Code* Get another image
 
 
Survivors series 2

Survivors

Untitled Document

Follow Den of Geek on

Related Articles

SEARCH

Coke Zero
Advertisement