Den of Geek

Heroes season 4 episode 12 review

James Hunt


The threat of the axe hovers over Heroes, and the last episode of 2009 doesn't offer much of a case for the show's defence...

Published on Dec 3, 2009

As the spectre of cancellation hovers over Heroes in earnest following Sendhil "Mohinder" Ramamurthy's casting in a new NBC pilot for next season, those of us still watching can only wonder: is this season going to go out on a high?

As a dry run for the eventual (inevitable?) conclusion, we have this, the final episode of the year and, traditionally, the big cliffhanger to keep us chomping at the bit over the hiatus. Unfortunately, the episode doesn't really deliver that. Come next year when the show returns, we'll be lucky if most of us even remember the events of this episode, since it stuck so closely to the Heroes template that it could've come from any part of the series.

The episode's truly big event, if we believe what we saw, was the final, actual very definitely real ‘death' of Nathan Petrelli, from which there is no coming back, at all. Except, of course, the death scene itself was so muted that the only thing that marked it out as a special moment was the big, hammy speech Nathan gave beforehand. Let's face it, characters on the show have come back from far worse, so when it becomes time to write an actual death scene, this doesn't remotely cut it.

Indeed, the logic of the scene itself was already pretty tenuous. If Sylar can be de-powered and made vulnerable by Peter's ability, and Nathan wants to die... why drop him off a roof where he can walk harmlessly away when he wakes up? Why not do the job properly? And while we're talking about plot logic, how did Sylar even shape-shift into Nathan while he was supposed to be de-powered? There's nothing wrong with bending the rules a little if it makes a story run smoother, but sometimes it's as if Heroes expects us to do the writers' job for them.

The rest of the episode's big plots barely even get a look in. Given that this is the final episode before the season break, it might've been nice to check in with some of the other characters we've been following over the previous ten weeks.

Matt, Hiro and Mohinder were left to their respective fates. Emma, the only genuinely interesting addition to this season's lineup, hasn't been in it at all for a good few episodes, while Ando hasn't turned up in the ‘present' for, I dunno, months, except for a brief and completely inexplicable moment in this episode. I'm all for a smaller cast, but that doesn't mean you can ignore stories that are in progress and expect people to care when they come back.

So much of this criticism could be invalidated if the stories they actually were concentrating on made any sense at all. There was nothing at all believable about Claire's initial caution turning into fully-fledged conversion, and the brief appearance of puppet-master Eric Doyle did very little to suggest she was in particularly good mental health. I can understand, after she helped him escape the authorities last season, that she might not be entirely upset to see him - but a hug? REALLY?

Gretchen, meanwhile, retains her status as the most one-dimensional and pointless addition to a series that seems to pride itself on being one-dimensional and pointless. If she had even the slightest amount of sense, she'd be straight on the phone to Noah, but such is my lack of faith in the series' writing that I'm fairly sure she won't take what should be a fairly obvious step for someone in her situation.

And so, in a meandering and confusing way, this episode presents us with Edgar's actual aim: to create a homeland for people with abilities. Whether or not he ever intends to achieve that goal is another matter, but certainly, people believe he will. The fact that less than two months ago he was a drunken, workshy man-child under the constant supervision of his brother apparently doesn't matter to those around him. Should it matter to us? Well, the writers don't seem to care (or have noticed) so I suppose not. Oh, well.

Given that this is the last episode of Heroes for a while, I feel like I should, at least, come up with something positive to say so that it doesn't end on a sour note. So, here goes: at least they managed to justify the romantic subplot in that flashback episode a few weeks ago. Noah and Lauren were the one good thing about this episode, so there might actually be some hope for the series yet. But let's not hold our collective breath, hmm?


Check out our previous review here.

 

Tags

Users Comments

Re: Heroes season 4 episode 12 review
Posted By chewedmelon 1 December 3, 2009 08:18:23 AM

This was it for me. The show has been underwhelming since the last episode of season one but I've been hanging in there through some sense of loyalty or habit. Like continuing to buy a comic series even though your fave artist writer team no longer produces it. This episode was the last straw. I'm not coming back. Heroes, I'm done.

Re: Heroes season 4 episode 12 review
Posted By cordas 1 December 3, 2009 09:46:38 AM

I only watches it yesterday and was wondering what the hell the cliff hanger was when you started talking about it in this review.... Personally I hope the show does get cancelled because then I won't have to watch it anymore in the vain hope that it might become decent again! Yes season 4 is a load better than season 3, but thats not saying much... having my eyeballs sandpapered would have been more enjoyable than season 3.

Re: Heroes season 4 episode 12 review
Posted By Ronin74 1 December 3, 2009 10:14:18 AM

I've stuck with Heroes throughout so far, but I'll stick with it until the conclusion of this series and then that's it. It's just becoming more miss than hit these days. Personally, I think it's had it's time to shine (series 1 and a handful of sporadic episodes since) but it's lost it's way and now it's maybe time to draw things to a close for good.

Re: Heroes season 4 episode 12 review
Posted By Slacker 1 December 3, 2009 01:43:49 PM

The whole best buddy act between Claire & Eric Doyle had me wondering if I'd missed an episode! Complete load of rubbish.

Re: Heroes season 4 episode 12 review
Posted By butchchops 1 December 3, 2009 02:42:54 PM

I'm really enjoying this series. I think it's the best since series one. As I've said before, I think it's odd to criticise a show for 'what you think will happen...' or 'I hope this doesn't happen...' Surely you should review what actually happens. I've also noticed that you seem to dislike the fact that Gretchen left a couple of episodes ago and now you dislike the fact that she's back? There's constructive criticism and there's whinging. Oh, and Peter's power blocking only works within a certain range so as Nathan fell, Sylar could take over. Remember when Rene couldn't block Arthur Petrelli's powers? Again, raising these as negative points moves you towards a 'scoffing nerd' rather than an 'enthusiastic geek'.

Re: Heroes season 4 episode 12 review
Posted By cordas 1 December 3, 2009 02:55:51 PM

I think you have missed the complaint about the Peter / Sylar fight..... how did Sylar shift into Nathan when Peter was sitting on his chest? Surely if Peter had let his blocking down Sylar would have lobotomised him on the spot... The complaint about Nathan's 'suicide' was that it was retarded, if Nathan had wanted to kill himself and Sylar then he should have destroyed himself within Peter's blocking range, rather than throw himself off the top of a building so he would fall out of the range and allow Sylar to take control again, therefore surviving. Saying this season is the best since the 1st isn't really saying anything because the previous 2 seasons were so atrocious. The criticism of this series is that it really doesn't make any sense if you engage more than 2 braincells to think about it for anything more than a few seconds.

Re: Heroes season 4 episode 12 review
Posted By butchchops 1 December 3, 2009 03:11:03 PM

Look I'm not starting a flame war here - leave that to Youtube commenters! I'm just saying that it's no way near as bad you're making out. And I'm not sure Nathan wanted to kill himself AND Sylar. I think he'd just had enough of trying to fight, which is a lot to ask of a guy who's already died. Sylar was breaking through as it was and there was no way Peter was going to kill him cos he loved him so much. All made clear by the build up to the scene. The series does make sense. It actually does. And I should know cos I engaged seven braincells for 18 seconds.

Re: Heroes season 4 episode 12 review
Posted By solaco111 1 December 3, 2009 04:58:13 PM

to sum this up - this is just a dead show, it's been dead since the beginning of season 2, (I gave up watching a while back and I suggest everyone else does the same, in the hope it will be cancelled and reborn in a few years time by some more creative writers).

Re: Heroes season 4 episode 12 review
Posted By kldade 1 December 3, 2009 05:09:54 PM

I also understood that Nathan was just trying to kill himself - I was under the impression that the main reason he threw himself off the roof was to give Peter some protection when Sylar came back fully healed... they could have done with a little less slow motion though - I almost thought that Nathan had changed his mind, and had decided to fly back up! And you've got to feel sorry for his wife and kids - not even a mention before he tops himself! Still, I'm still enjoying this season, I'm not even too bothered that it's taking its time with the main story.

Re: Heroes season 4 episode 12 review
Posted By jrhunt 1 December 4, 2009 01:41:28 AM

@butchchops - I didn't dislike the fact that Gretchen left. In fact, at the time, I praised her actions as being one of the show's rare examples of "sane behaviour". What I disliked was how they made her leave without resolving the pointless lesbianism subplot, which - guess what - hasn't even been mentioned since she returned. Also, as other commenters have pointed out, it wasn't Nathan's shapeshifting as he fell that bothered me, but the bit where an explicitly de-powered Sylar shape-shifts into Nathan. Like I say, at this point, the writers don't seem to be following their own logic anymore. It's not the job of fans to make excuses for what we see happening on screen - at the very least, we should expect TV to make sense! I fully concede that Nathan's suicide could've been a spur of the moment thing, rather than a calculated anti-Sylar gambit, but even if you can justify that, you can't justify the painfully crappy speech he delivered beforehand. Kldade makes an excellent point about Nathan's wife and kids, too. Again, that's something the writers continually gloss over in the hope that fans won't notice. It's not just a desire to one-up the writers by pointing out minor flaws in their episode. There are major story and character elements going completely unaddressed, and it's geniuinely insulting to our intelligence as viewers.

Re: Heroes season 4 episode 12 review
Posted By butchchops 1 December 4, 2009 04:07:35 AM

Well on the off chance that anyone connected with the show is reading this, I would like to point out that I am not insulted by the show. As for Nathan's speech, the man had died. I think that would change someone's viewpoint on life somewhat! So I will happily accept the post of 'making an excuse' for how an already dead man speaks to his brother before killing himself and becoming his own killer. What doesn't make sense about that? With the whole Nathan/Sylar shapeshifting debacle, I see his power as being, just different to normal. We've not seen a shapeshifter actually battling with the shapeshiftee before, so who are we to say that it wouldn't happen? The way Nathan and Sylar were connected throughout the season was clearly messed up from the start so these glithes are easily explained. Also, didn't Peter say something about 'letting him out'? Can he alter the degree of his powers? Maybe you're worried that the writers aren't following your logic anymore. I'll leave you by reminding you of when you were critical of the fact that no-one had noticed Nathan's disappearance a while ago. That was claimed to be the writers 'glossing over' and 'insulting our intelligence' only to be resolved two weeks later quite appropriatley. Maybe we should wait to see the outcome before making accusations of intelligence-insulting. (Especially from those who claim that they haven't watched it since whenever)

Re: Heroes season 4 episode 12 review
Posted By cordas 1 December 4, 2009 09:32:53 AM

LMAO Butchchops, I ain't looking for a flamewar either. I am just sick of Heroes, sick of hoping that it will become good again, sick of the fact that the writers don't even try to make any effort to make it internally consistent. If the Peter / Sylar fight was the only hole then I wouldn't be bothered, but the entire show is littered with these holes. I just feel that I am addict who realises he has a problem, but carries on thinking that I can handle one more hit, all the time telling myself I can stop any time I want...

Re: Heroes season 4 episode 12 review
Posted By jrhunt 1 December 4, 2009 12:59:19 PM

@butchchops - you're doing exactly what fans shouldn't have to - making excuses for the events you saw on screen. "Maybe this, maybe that, perhaps Peter let him use his powers" - but none of that was in the episode. All we saw was a de-powered Sylar shape-shifting into Nathan ie: using powers he did not have access to. Similarly, you're making excuses for Nathan not mentioning his wife and kids. It wouldn't have taken any effort at all for the writers to address these issues within the show. The fact that they didn't suggests that they're just hoping we won't notice. If this was the only time, it could be forgiveable, but as Cordas says - these kind of examples have been par for the course ever since Season 3. Heroes isn't as bad as some of its peers, but for a show that once looked like it could be the next Lost, it's undeniably fallen hard.

Re: Heroes season 4 episode 12 review
Posted By cordas 1 December 4, 2009 01:20:14 PM

If you want to see how a show like Heroes should be handled, how it can be internally consistent then give Misfits a watch or go back and watch season 1 of heroes again :-)

Re: Heroes season 4 episode 12 review
Posted By Codgin 1 December 5, 2009 09:30:23 AM

Im not going to defend Heroes for some of its more obvious faults, but Season 4 has gone through a lot of tearing down to rebuild itself as the show we once cared about, I think everybody bashing the show should give Heroes the credit for that. From the last 12 episodes this season has had a lot of high and low points but what stands out to me is this show is in the best shape its been for two years. Yes this episode had faults, the Peter and Sylar fight at its core was good fun, and maybe Nathans death can be forgiven when Sylar goes and kills Petes mom, but who can deny Sylar walking off to bell toles wasn't good fun? If you don't enjoy the show anymore, then stop watching it, stop complaining, it's come to a point where you either accept that this show will always have faults or to walk away and watch Scrubs or something, the end

Re: Heroes season 4 episode 12 review
Posted By butchchops 1 December 10, 2009 03:43:02 AM

Agreed Codgin, well put.
Post a Comment
Security Code* Get another image
 
 
Heroes season 4

Heroes

Untitled Document

Follow Den of Geek on

Related Articles

SEARCH

Coke Zero
Advertisement