Den of Geek

Heroes season 4 episode 3 review

James Hunt


There's no Hiro, but there are other Heroes staples ever-present as season four soldiers on...

Published on Oct 1, 2009

This week on Heroes: a very slow development of existing subplots with no clear indication where the show as a whole is heading. But you knew that, right?

The episode represented a rare Hiro-less outing for the series - a sure sign that things have moved on from the early days when Hiro was one of the characters who bound the show together. That said, where once his absence would've been immediately apparent, I didn't even notice it until I sat down to write the review. It's a far cry from the days when Hiro was the only character worth tuning in for, and highlights the character's slow descent into mediocrity, spurred on by tedious power-mangling plots and uninventive time-travel paradoxes. Mercifully, we didn't have to deal with any of that this week.

Instead, the focus is back on Peter, the series' once-and-future star. Although it's difficult to reconcile this version of Peter with some of the earlier ones, the character is definitely benefiting from a more streamlined premise, where he can copy one power at a time and uses them to help him in his job as a paramedic. The idea that he's neglecting his real life to save people is a classic super-hero theme, so it's a pity that the need to tie the character into a series-arc via Samuel's carnival of weirdness is getting in the way of exploring that element.

Samuel himself does, at least, have an interesting plot, even if his motivations and interests are only ever referenced in the kind of vague conversation that poorly written TV characters have. We now know, in unequivocal terms, that he's a bad guy with a dark past. It might be cheap, it might be cliché, but it's hard to deny that it works. Exactly what he's up to will probably take plenty more episodes to come out, but for now, it's enough to be amused by the fact that he killed a bunch of satirically haughty rich people. God knows the rest of the episode lacked a sense of humour, so I'll take it where I can get it.

With Nathan-Sylar (Nylar?) put aside for yet another episode, Parkman's plot remains easily the most interesting, as Sylar demonstrates just how dangerous he can be even without a body. Matt's plot thread is one of the few that actually builds on past seasons in a subtle and interesting way, as Parkman inadvertently heads off down the same path as his villainous father. It's a rare thing for Heroes to reward, rather than punish its long-time viewers, so let's assume it's an intentional choice and savour it while we can.

On the other side of the coin, Claire's plot is actually getting more excruciating. More than ever, it feels as though the scenes are being re-used from other episodes as we face the rather wearing Noah/Claire argument about whether someone needs their brain wiped or Claire can handle things by herself. It feels like we've seen that exact scene about 50 times before. Surely there must be something new that can be done with Claire? And I'm not talking about the rumoured lesbian-kiss ratings grabber, which they started setting up with some rather un-subtle candle-and-music scenes in this episode.

The introduction of a deaf and newly-synaesthesthic woman, Emma, is probably Heroes' most interesting move since the first series. Her introduction was efficient, but didn't give too much away and managed to leave her as an intriguing figure. The eventual discovery of her light and sound-based powers was a beautifully ethereal moment for a series that usually relies on the most bare and mechanical direction to tell its story. Scenes like this suggest that someone, somewhere on Heroes does actually know what they're doing - although, as the saying goes, even a stopped clock is right twice a day.

Episode 3, then. Not the worst Heroes has ever been by a long shot - but there still aren't enough new ideas. Unfortunately, the best thing I can say about this episode is that at least it wasn't double length like the season opener. As ever, the potential is there, it just failed to be realised - and as the series spins towards almost certain cancellation at the end of this series, that feels like it's going the be the epitaph for a show that once bordered on being the next Buffy or Lost.

Check out our review of the season opener, episodes 1 and 2, here.

 

Tags

Users Comments

Re: Heroes season 4 episode 3 review
Posted By cordas 1 October 1, 2009 10:43:45 AM

Hmmm... Not sure where to start with this review... I agree with a lot of the points Mr Hunt has made, but can't reconcile myself with his complaints over 'very slow development'...The show was great when this is how they did things, and utter garbage when they went fast...

Re: Heroes season 4 episode 3 review
Posted By stuxmusic 1 October 1, 2009 03:14:47 PM

I second that comment, cordas.

Re: Heroes season 4 episode 3 review
Posted By jrhunt 1 October 1, 2009 03:36:16 PM

In fairness, it is possible for a TV show to develop plots at speed without going crap. The problem with Heroes is that it stretches an episode's worth of development over three episode's worth of time.

Re: Heroes season 4 episode 3 review
Posted By RobGordon23 1 October 1, 2009 04:50:17 PM

"and as the series spins towards almost certain cancellation at the end of this series, that feels like it's going the be the epitaph for a show that once bordered on being the next Buffy or Lost." Not sure how making a comparison to Lost backs up your comment above or is supposed to mean something positive.

Re: Heroes season 4 episode 3 review
Posted By Codgin 1 October 1, 2009 05:14:38 PM

I think Heroes is treading a little more in the right direction as of late and so should be celebrated for it, more postivity, less negatvity by the fans and reviewers. If three episodes of Heroes that havent sucked just yet isn't worth celebrating I don't know what is! And in regards to the Claire/HRG thing, its been done before, yes, but now I think their going about it in a different way, kind of like starting again with the charchter its not perfect, no, but its not as tired as HRG actually interferring, I think the break up in the Bennet family is starting to do wonders for their charchters

Re: Heroes season 4 episode 3 review
Posted By cordas 1 October 1, 2009 09:19:41 PM

I just think there are a number of people who really want to hate this show...

Re: Heroes season 4 episode 3 review
Posted By Slacker 1 October 2, 2009 12:22:42 AM

@Cordas I think it just the frustration over so much wasted potential.

Re: Heroes season 4 episode 3 review
Posted By discountdom 1 October 2, 2009 08:11:54 PM

I've enjoyed the start of this series far more tha series 3 which was all over the place. i even enjoyed the rainbow music lady, despite mixed feelings from early reviews, is that a little Bryan Fuller Pushing Daisies style whimsy i spy?

Re: Heroes season 4 episode 3 review
Posted By cress 1 October 4, 2009 12:46:39 AM

I think Heroes is heading in the right direction from what I've seen this season. The stories are more contained. The core characters are the focus. And the writers aren't "all over the place" with new hero character introductions that plagued season 2&3. Peter is actually cool again. I even like the fairgrounds dude from Prison Break. I think a lot of people just want to piss on Heroes, no matter what it does. This season seems to have more mystery, like Season 1, as to what will happen. I think Tim Kring went down the WATER-SLIDE with Season 2&3, instead of just taking the slightly more anticapatory WATER-RIDE. No more mutant armies, no more government round-up--and that is great. But I fear its too little, too late.

Re: Heroes season 4 episode 3 review
Posted By Richie9 1 October 6, 2009 08:12:20 AM

Can I suggest that all reviews come with the network, country, date and time of broadcast from now on? It would be dead useful, almost as good as the geek TV articles.

Re: Heroes season 4 episode 3 review
Posted By gudge 1 October 9, 2009 05:15:02 PM

James, sorry I havent commented earlier but I have only just watched the episode. This was an excellent review compared to many recent reviews on the site, and still left a lot for people that hadnt actually seen the episode. I completely agree that Heroes has wasted its potential, but as you rightly pointed out the Parkman/Sylar thread is really interesting. I'm still not sure where they are going with Robert Knappers character though. Yes, it seemed that he was being all evil and nasty - but we never saw him intentionally kill everyone. For all we know he emotions got ahead of him. If it's one thing Heroes is known for, its curve balls with a characters emotional motives. Finally - goddamn I hate Clare Bennett. I really really hate her. Its a good job Hayden Pantsdownherarse or however you spell her name is super-fit.
Post a Comment
Security Code* Get another image
 
 

Heroes

Untitled Document

Follow Den of Geek on

Related Articles

SEARCH

Coke Zero
Advertisement