Den of Geek

The Future Of 24

Simon Brew


Even embryonic human beings some months away from being born stopped taking bets on Jack Bauer's survival.

Is season 8 of 24 going to be the show’s last? And should it mark the final adventure for Kiefer Sutherland’s Jack Bauer?

Published on Aug 20, 2009

For a while now, it's been all-but-assumed that the currently-in-production eighth season of 24 is to be the last for the show, given that it's the last that Kiefer Sutherland is formally signed up for. Sutherland famously signed a three-season deal to play Jack Bauer after the fifth series that made him a very rich man, and once the clock ticks at the end of the show's next run, that deal is done and dusted.

Of course, there's nothing to suggest that Sutherland couldn't sign another deal and keep Jack Bauer batting aside inconveniences such as biological agent infections, being killed and having everyone around him die for several more years to come. But the problem facing 24 is actually not one of personnel. It's that the show could very well have come to the end of its natural life span.

The first season of the show was a bolt out of nowhere, a breath of fresh air that was genuinely edge-of-the-seat viewing, with unpredictable twists and some outstanding cliffhangers. The subsequent few seasons all obeyed the laws of diminishing returns, until someone happened upon the idea of a character called Charles Logan in 24's fifth season, arguably the best of the show to date.

That was, sadly, followed by the muddled travesty of season six, and when the writers' strike kicked in at the end of 2007, there was a theory that it could actually help 24 out. With around eight episodes in the can for the show's seventh season, Fox gave the show a year's break, which should have been ample time to sort out the problems 24 had been facing, and perhaps introduce a bit more unpredictability into the action. After all, over the years, regular viewers have grown used to the conventions of the show, and thus even the twists and turns of the plot became steadfastly expected rather than exciting.

Yet season seven, despite the year break, was a conventional, by-the-numbers adventure for Jack Bauer, that just got plain daft by the end (you can read what we thought of Kim Bauer, for instance, right here). It played things a little safe in an attempt to get the show back on track, but ultimately, highlighted the trouble that 24 is facing. It didn't help that it seemed to kill off its most promising characters (we'd have kept Kurtwood Smith around for a long time, for instance), but the bigger issue was a feeling of seen it all before. Combine that with the fact that Jack Bauer is clearly a man more invincible than any superhero the world has ever seen, and the peril levels simply dissolved. Did anyone, after all, seriously expect that Jack Bauer was going to die when he was exposed to an incurable biological agent? Even embryonic human beings some months away from being born stopped taking bets on Bauer's survival.

Season eight of 24, therefore, either needs to find a brilliant new character such as Charles Logan, or it's time that the producers pulled the plug on the show. We've talked before how 24 could and perhaps should work in the future without Jack Bauer, given the ring of protection around his body and soul, but that's not going to happen. And instead, when season eight begins its run next January, the big surprise would be if 24 still has its ability to pull any major surprise at all.

And perhaps it's not just us thinking it. The show's executive producer, Evan Katz, has now revealed to Entertainment Weekly that a storyline that would end the series full stop has been developed, and will be worked into season eight if necessary. This, of course, is dependent on Fox's decision as to what to do with the show, and it's believed that several endings are being prepared should a season nine get a green light.

Given that talk has regularly surfaced about a movie version of 24, the one certainty we'd suggest is that Jack Bauer is going to walk away from the eighth worst day of his life with his heart still beating. Our suggestion, though, were Fox really willing to take a gamble and pull the rug in the way that the show used to be able to effortlessly do, would be to kill Bauer in about episode 10 of the next season. That way, for the first time in a long time, you'd genuinely believe that no character in the show at all would be safe. And it'd potentially lead to an ending worthy of the show in its heyday.

We'll start getting answers to some of these thoughts and theories from next January, when 24 blasts back onto our screens...

 

Tags

Users Comments

Re: The Future Of 24
Posted By cordas 1 August 20, 2009 09:23:29 AM

Kill Jack Bauer, do it in a way that its possible he could have escaped from, and tease the audience repeatedly during season 8 that he is about to come back but have the final twist be that he really is dead....

Re: The Future Of 24
Posted By PeaJay18 1 August 20, 2009 09:54:03 AM

Whilst I agree that season 6 was utter rubbish compared to the others, the key problem with 24 is that no season, apart from the 1st, feels like it actually takes place during one 24-hour period. The real-time aspect is what sets the show apart and it has become less of a factor as the need to shoe-horn an action set piece into each episode replaces any sense of realism.

Re: The Future Of 24
Posted By Gazzajagman 1 August 20, 2009 10:03:33 AM

I recon they should kill Jack off in the first episode. Start the opening scene at his funeral...in the rain mellodrama. Then have the rest of the season in flashback.

Re: The Future Of 24
Posted By cordas 1 August 20, 2009 10:28:41 AM

I like that idea Gazzajagman.

Re: The Future Of 24
Posted By gudge 1 August 20, 2009 02:17:50 PM

Flashback absolutely would not work - the previous 168 episodes were in realtime. U can't change it now!

Re: The Future Of 24
Posted By blindfold11 1 August 20, 2009 02:23:48 PM

I don't think they need to kill anyone off. they just need to rethink how they write and build tension. Killing jack would only work on us once! After that it may just fall back into the usual pattern. that's all they need to do is rethink how to write it and it will be fine. Simon really doesn't like Kim Bauer... I ain't gonna argue there.

Re: The Future Of 24
Posted By cordas 1 August 20, 2009 07:27:21 PM

Why wouldn't flashback work, we know it isn't 'real' time. The show is set over 24 hours, and it would still be possible to do that by having a prelude set in the future, then going back and running the show over a 24 hour time period. Sorry but they need to kill Jack, simply because as long as Jack is alive its impossible to build any real tension in the show any more... We know that any other character can be killed (apart from Tony, but he is evil/mad now). The reaction of everyone i knew who watched 24 when they told us jack was going to die in 2 hours from nerve poison was 'yeah right, like thats gonna stop jack' and guess what to the surprise of ABSOLUTELY no one he survived... If they want to give the show a future they have to kill Jack, not blow his legs off or paralyse him but actually kill him.

Re: The Future Of 24
Posted By Sprocket 1 August 24, 2009 01:32:22 PM

It really is about time they put 24 out of my misery. Every year since year 2 they have said "best year ever" and then let me down, mind you I still get dragged back to the tv to watch it, just in case they are telling the truth.

Re: The Future Of 24
Posted By spatula 1 August 24, 2009 05:20:59 PM

I don't know if a flashback could work, but why can't the make a major change like that? It worked for Lost.

Re: The Future Of 24
Posted By sgs8r 1 August 29, 2009 05:57:05 AM

Suggesting that they rejuvenate 24 by killing off Jack Bauer is like suggesting they rejuvenate the Superman franchise by killing off Superman. Bauer is the central compelling character of the show. He *is* the show. Sure, 24's bag of tricks has gotten old, but they need to develop primary character(s) capable of carrying the show before killing off Bauer. Or come up with some genuinely new plot ideas. Otherwise, they should call it a wrap and do something else.

Re: The Future Of 24
Posted By Numpsey 1 September 1, 2009 04:58:01 AM

They went wrong in 2 places in being able to run 24 without Jack Bauer. #1. They killed Tony, brought him back, and made him vengeful. #2 They killed off Curtis Manning. Those were the only two characters they had to carry on 24 without Jack Bauer and have people keep watching it. They need another 2 years to create a character to the level of Tony and Curtis. Oh, #3 they killed of CTU. They need to bring it back or make another one.

Re: The Future Of 24
Posted By pokerking 1 September 1, 2009 06:24:48 AM

Simple. I would kill off kim bauer!. It starts with kim funeral.. jack bauer goes all out jack bauer killing everyone on his way...he eventually dies in the encounter before assasinate all.

Re: The Future Of 24
Posted By pokerking 1 September 1, 2009 06:27:58 AM

Key reason season six failed is thinking 24 is just twist and turn and action...Key is develop a charaters you hate and love and make them clash between jack bauer. season six was utter failure. season 7 was watchable atleast rene..they should have developed her more...i still do not like tony becoming villain...it did not work.
Post a Comment
Security Code* Get another image
 
 
24

24 returns in January.

Untitled Document

Follow Den of Geek on

Related Articles

SEARCH

Coke Zero
Advertisement