Den of Geek

Can Dollhouse survive a second season?

Carley Tauchert


Joss Whedon’s Dollhouse was arguably the disappointment of the last television season. But does it have enough left in the tank to make good on a second season?

Published on Jul 13, 2009

It would be fair to say that Joss Whedon is a creative genius. He not only gave the world Buffy The Vampire Slayer and its spin-off Angel, but he also re-invented the western genre with Firefly. He has worked as a script doctor on films such as Toy Story and Titan A.E. and his first time in a film director's chair produced Serenity, a big screen outing for the Firefly team, which not only garnered a cult following, but was - in my view, at least - a pretty amazing film.

I have, if you haven't guessed, a huge soft spot for Joss Whedon. Buffy The Vampire Slayer was and, in fact, still is my favourite television series. But recently, and no matter how hard I try, I just can't seem to get into his zone and I think I may have to blame this slightly on Dollhouse. Please note if you are only watching this show in the UK now, what I'm about to discuss does contain some spoilers.

The idea of Dollhouse is, as I understand it, the brainchild of both Whedon and its star Eliza Dushku. It was a concept, so the story goes, they came up with over lunch one day. Dushku had signed a five-series development deal with Fox, and while talking about ideas they came across this one and stuck with it.

Dushku plays the lead, Echo, an active within the Dollhouse who has her memory erased and a new one implanted for any assignment she is sent on, be it that of a bank robber or as the perfect girlfriend. They are looked after by Handlers and, should the situation take a turn for the worse, they can be extracted. Thrown into the mix is a rogue active, Alpha, who wants to bring the Dollhouse down and take Echo for himself.

I'll admit straight off the bat that Dollhouse is a very good original idea; I was intrigued by the concept of dolls, blank canvases, so to speak, who can literally become anybody. But the reality of how it was introduced on screen failed to, in any real way, live up to the hype. And one of the main factors of this is the fact that, although you can feel Whedon's influence over the project, he doesn't really make a proper appearance until episode six, where you can feel his vision really begin to take shape. But it felt like it was a little too late.

After plodding along for what felt like an eternity, and with most of the episodes slightly reminding me of plots that took place in V.I.P., the two-episode season finale really wrapped the show up well (you can thank the ever wonderful Alan Tudyk for that). But it can't be ignored that the show was critically unsuccessful, with both the industry and fans alike. Cancellation looked inevitable, but Fox really did pull a bit of a surprise when they renewed for a further 13 episodes. Now here is a slight conundrum for the show; has it played its ace card too quickly?

Alpha is a great character and you have the feeling that the creatives on Dollhouse thought the end was nigh, and they may as well wrap the story up. It's a story which could have carried on into season two; after all, Alpha is not the really big season baddie we were used to seeing in Buffy. He carried with him more about the workings of the Dollhouse and what can go wrong. Having him escape does free him up for the future, but the mystery has mostly dispersed.

In my personal opinion, I think the best course of action for this show would have been to follow the plot progression that Angel did - from fighting against, to walking into, the offices of Wolfram & Hart. The audience always knew they were up to no good and eventually the tables were turned and Angel & Co took over the offices, which led to them taking down the beast from the inside (which could have played out for a further season, but the show was cancelled prematurely).

Yet the progression to that point took the best part of five seasons, and Dollhouse could learn a lesson or two from that, as Whedon did mention he had a five year vision for the show.

However, with the slot it's currently been given by Fox for its second season, I'm not holding out much hope for a third, and it simply might not have the space or ideas left to develop as it should. We'll find out in the autumn...

 

Tags

Users Comments

Re: Can Dollhouse survive a second season?
Posted By Grumbled0re 1 July 13, 2009 10:31:46 AM

Well, unbeliever, what I take from exactly those same words is that the magic happened. Yes, it did take a lot longer that we had all hoped, but it did happen. When you take a look at the variety that Buffy offered - from musicals to multiple deaths of the main star to the many multi-themed story arcs that gilded each season, it is hard to doubt that this premise has a similar depth and potential in store. My totally uninformed and somewhat cynical view would be that FOX wanted some "grabby action" of the type they could match more comfortably against TV programming demographics before handing over the creative reins from the hitching post and finding out what really was in Joss' mind. I was a disappointed critic by episode 3, and had rediscovered my faith by the end. Bring it on!

Re: Can Dollhouse survive a second season?
Posted By cordas 1 July 13, 2009 11:56:10 AM

I would say i am sat firmly on the fence, dollhouse at its best was decent TV, but that tended to be when I suspect it was at its least studio / fox friendly, and that when it was at its worst (sex doll) was probably when the studio liked it best.... Time will tell what season 2 has in store for us, and I will be watching in order to find out, but I ain't holding my breath. Honestly I wish that Fox had given 13 episodes to Terminator: Sarah Conner Chronicles instead, as that was a far far better show in my humble opinion.

Re: Can Dollhouse survive a second season?
Posted By geekygirlUK 1 July 13, 2009 01:12:52 PM

Worshipper of his Jossness though I am, and much as I enjoyed Dollhouse, I have to agree with Cordas - I wish that it had been Sarah Connor that had been renewed rather than Dollhouse. Dollhouse did pick up towards the end, and there is plenty of scope to explore some interesting issues and themes, but as Cordas says, Fox's idea of good TV and Joss's don't always match. I'd like to think they've learnt their lesson about interfering with a genius at work, but they always have a surprise knife waiting for the second your back's turned.

Re: Can Dollhouse survive a second season?
Posted By ssj4timoteo 1 July 13, 2009 01:56:52 PM

One word: Yes. I agree that Dollhouse was a slow first season as most. But look at Buffy, how many "useless" episodes were in that first season? Personally I don't feel they are useless, they set the setting. Most people tell you the setting your supposed to believe it then get right into the arch's. Joss lays ground work. He says, "Okay this is an everyday life in Dollhouse/Slayer, this is the norm, day to day." That way when the fan is hit, it's a much bigger "Holy ****" Again though, for season 2, I point towards any Joss Whedon work. Look at transitions from season 1 to 2..... he's done placing the setting, now it's all about story, and I'm excited, it's going to be excellent. And in that respect, it always makes me wonder about Firefly... Firefly's first season was already amazingly awesomeness, so a second season of that woulda... well, I shutter to think how perfect it woulda been. All in all, I have high hopes and I don't think people should count Joss out just off his first season, his first season's are always slow.

Re: Can Dollhouse survive a second season?
Posted By Ghalev 1 July 13, 2009 02:19:04 PM

While I felt disappointed by the five-pilots-in-a-row approach of the early Dollhouse episodes, I really felt it achieved full Jossness after that. And frankly, with a lowered budget forcing even more character-oriented fare, things can only get better. I have high hopes. That said: I too would have picked Sarah Connor Chronicles, had I been given the choice, because SCC season 2 had no weak spots at all; it was magnificent.

Re: Can Dollhouse survive a second season?
Posted By ants97 1 July 13, 2009 03:15:07 PM

I'm another who'd rather have had another 13 episodes of the sarah connor chronicles but if dollhouse manages to even last 13 eps I'll be amazed. Its rating were in freefall towards the end of its run and went further down the pan when tscc finished so god knows how they are going to look when you see the garbage its being paired with now. Having said that it did really pick up after a load of generic tv by numbers episodes but it was too little to late. One piece of advice I'd give us to use amy acker more. In the last 2 episodes she out acted dushku and gained more sympathy than echo will ever get from me. more amy acker and less dushku.

Re: Can Dollhouse survive a second season?
Posted By greennogo 1 July 13, 2009 04:54:08 PM

Dollhouse can survive--as long as it can remain cost effective--if it can pull about a 1.5 in the 18-49 demo on Friday nights. These are definitely niche level ratings--even for a Friday, but FOX clearly wants to brand Fridays as an evening for scripted programming, and as long as Pilots like Masterwork have projected episode order budgets at $3.5 million plus per, FOX won't have anything more cost effective to replace it with. But if Dollhouse can't improve from it's 1.0 rating in the season finale, I'd expect to see a lot of House reruns or episodes of 'Are you smarter than a 5th grader?' in that 8/9pm slot by mid-October. The big question is...how does it build it's viewership. FOX really screwed the pooch when network demanded a thriller of the week structure for the episodes over the first half of the season. I understand why they did it, because episodic action oriented episodes are easier to market than a serialized show about Identity, Prostitution, and the Anti-singularity, but the problem was all of the unconvincing plot convolutions used to sell us the "Bionic Dushku Action Hour" were completely irrelevent to the actual themes of the show. If FOX can keep their mitts off and allow the show to explore the "business of fantasy" and the "purpose of transhumanist apocalypse", then Dollhouse might be able to survive on it's own terms. It's risky, and the show'll never hit top 25 numbers that way, but with a little luck, it may manage to carve out a decent enough niche.

Re: Can Dollhouse survive a second season?
Posted By Sovrath 1 July 13, 2009 05:36:16 PM

I have to say that I was one who wrote fox and asked that they continue the series. The Friday night time slot was not convenient so I was never able to watch it. I did attend an event at Harvard where Joss Whedon was invited to speak. It seemed to me that there were many Dollhouse fans in the audience who were all taping the episode (as the event fell on Friday). I eventually found out that one could view the show on Amazon and I-tunes and I gladly paid in order to view every episode. It was my understanding that Fox had some stipulations for the first 5 episodes. However, I think that overall it's a great show and will gladly pay (because the show will still stay on Friday night) my e-rental fee for every one of the new episodes. I think the series needs the second season in order to grow into what it could be without Fox's interference.

Re: Can Dollhouse survive a second season?
Posted By MarvMarble 1 July 14, 2009 11:36:23 PM

I've only seen a few of the first series episodes (so I'll admit I skipped some of the article in case of spoilers) and I actually rather enjoyed it. A couple of things got a bit repetitive, but it's still been decent TV.

Re: Can Dollhouse survive a second season?
Posted By guesswho4715 1 August 7, 2009 09:27:28 AM

I am also a huge Joss fan & a huge Buffy fan. I never watched buffy when it was on. A friend introduced it to me later & had all seasons on DVD. I have to say, the show was fun and quirky in the beginning, but not great. Good, just not great. With each season it got better and better as I became attached to the characters and story & as Joss grew with the project. I agree Dollhouse had the same slow start, but I have faith that it will be worth hanging around for. Even Buffy had a fairly small fan base by the end of season one. Committed, but small by rating standards. Look how far it went from there. Joss gives us a reason to look forward to TV again, and I can't wait to see where he goes next. Also, I do love Echo. I think to many want to compare her to Faith and those are unfair comparisons. I thinks she does a great job, and considering the slow 1st season, she made it work. We have to give her a chance as Echo. I has to be very challenging to portray a different character and personality week after week, & I think she's doing a great job in this leading role. Her character is nothing like Faith & I personally don't see Faith when I'm watching her. That alone shows me she is doing great w/ her portrayal of this character & I think she will also grow as the show goes on. I do not expected to be dissapointed, unless the show gets pulled of course.
Post a Comment
 
Dollhouse

Joss Whedon's Dollhouse

Follow Den of Geek on

Related Articles

SEARCH

Broadband

Mobile Broadband

Compare over 100 mobile broadband & broadband deals online!

Mobile Phones

LG ArenaHTC Magic

Compare over 250 mobile phones &
52,000 deals!