Den of Geek

The Apprentice 2009 episode 12 review: the final

Simon Brew


The business lesson here is pure and simple: if you want to get a job working for Lord Sralan, you don’t need to be the best candidate, you don't need to have the best product, and you don't need to have the best campaign.

Sir Alan Sugar chooses his Apprentice, as Simon reviews the final episode of 2009's run. Was it Yasmina or Kate who triumphed?

Published on Jun 7, 2009

There’s a fascinating conundrum facing the makers of The Apprentice next year. By 2010, Sralan Sugar will have become a Lord. What, assuming he keeps his role on the show, are next year’s collection of contestants supposed to bleat in unison to him? “Yes, Lord Sralan”. “Good morning your Lordship Of Amstradshire”. Or maybe they should go the whole hog, bow, and call him “My Lord”. Ah, decisions, decisions.

You still have to wonder just what business lessons the new Lord Sugar has been drafted in by the Government to teach. Setting impossible goals and berating young, inexperienced candidates when they fail to meet them? Growling and generally being miserable at the first opportunity? Injecting businesses with such a pervading focus on negativity that only the clinically insane would consider it a good place to work? On the basis of The Apprentice, that’s just what he’d do on day one. And that's before we get to the decision he made at the end of this final episode.

Truthfully, I’d not been looking forward to this final, courtesy of the media bleating about how it was an all-female final episode, and thus spurring on articles about whether the glass ceiling had been shattered. That kind of argument would assume that the show bears much relation to real business life, when plainly, it doesn’t Then we’ve had the two finalists poshed up in the papers as part of the hype machine, and it confirmed that – and I know I’m naïve for holding out hope otherwise – The Apprentice is now fully a reality show, rather than anything with any kind of business message to give.

Enough of that, anyway. There’s one question in my mind here: how the fuck has Yasmina just won The Apprentice? How, after an episode where she came up with a crap product, a crap advertising campaign and generally failed to particularly impress all series, has she emerged victorious? Serious, and it’s nothing personal, but if Gordon Brown was watching that, surely he’s thinking of revoking his offer to Lord Sralan. At the very least, a phone call to find out what's going on wouldn't hurt.

Meanwhile, Kate’s product was excellent. She managed to prove time and time again that she could make the right decisions at the right time, and did it without rubbing people up the wrong way. The business lesson here is pure and simple: if you want to get a job working for Lord Sralan, you don’t need to be the best candidate, you don't need to have the best product, and you don't need to have the best campaign.

Let’s rewind a little, though. The task this week pitched Kate and Yasmina against each other to design a box of chocolates, and come up with a marketing plan. Then both candidates would have to present said chocolates to an industry panel. You know the drill by now.

As part of the process, out came the previous candidates, and both got to choose who they wanted on their side. Interestingly, Kate avoided the option to pick Phillip, and had seemingly pulled a masterstroke when we cut to him trying to train dancers for Yasmina later on. Pantsman lives again, clearly.

The two teams got to work, anyway, and Yasmina’s team had an idea to appeal to men. They looked at a brand that women would buy for men, but the focus groups soon put them off the scent of his one. Granted, Yasmina – with some justification, as we’ve noted in our reviews right throughout the series – has been proven a victim of the editing over the past weeks, but for me, this was the only area where she genuinely impressed this week. She, half way through day one, realised it wasn’t working, and instead opted for Cocoa Electric instead. That what was a brave decision, and cut the already tight timelines of her project even further.

Cocoa Electric, we learned, was a box of shitty tasting chocolates that, according to the advertising campaign, would give you an electric shock when you ate them. The box looked quite impressive, but the highlight was Margaret tasting one of them, and looking like she was licking piss off the nearest thistle. It's fair to say that few were impressed with the product.

Kate’s team, meanwhile, was quite innovative. She opted for a chocolate brand that would appeal to men and women, with a third tray to share. The box continued the innovation, too, with a three drawer concept that looked interesting. And while, perhaps, her fatal error proved to be the pricing (which was roundly criticised), her product was interesting. She even managed to jump into the advert production at one point and add a proper ending to it. Nick, in particular, seemed really quite bowled over.

Her wisest decision may have been to chance the name at the last minute, though. Intimate, as many noted, had more seemingly in common with feminine hygiene products, and the last minute change to Choc D’Amour was a wise move.

When it came to the presentations, Kate again – and I had no preference for either candidate, to be clear, but just judge this on what I saw – managed to deliver a slightly nervous but generally good presentation. Yasmina’s? It had me cringing on the sofa. It didn’t seem to flow, and at this point, I remarked to my wife that this felt like Manchester United playing the local school under 5s team at football. There just seemed little way that Kate could lose.

And then she did.

What puzzles me, however, it that I fail to see the logic in the ultimate choice that Lord Sralan made. What was it about Yasmina that he preferred? Was it that she had her own business? I honestly thought that when he was going on about toughest decision ever, and how he felt bad putting Yasmina’s staff out of work, he was just bottling looking someone in the face and telling them why they’d lost. That, or trying to make it look dramatic.

And that’s why, ultimately, The Apprentice is now 100% reality show. For it to have any educational benefit to the world of business, which was there in the original intention of the show, you have to have some inkling as to why the final decision was made. But it was never really explained, and were this a scripted drama, we’d be talking, surely, about a cheat ending just to put a twist in there.

Maybe Yasmina was right. Maybe she’d been more the victim of the editing more than we’d thought. Because, and this may just be me, on pretty much every criteria in this final episode, Kate seemed to do better than Yasmina. Congratulations to her, to be fair, but that doesn’t make me any the less puzzled.

Lord Sralan? You may just be a genius, and you may save British business single handedly. But I still haven’t got a clue why you did what you just did. Still, we may or may not, depending on the accuracy of the newspaper reports this morning, be seeing you again next year. And I suspect that I, despite this odd final episode (and generally middle-of-the-road series), be back again in front of my telly too...

Check out the review of the last episode here.

 

Tags

Users Comments

Re: The Apprentice 2009 episode 12 review: the final
Posted By kurtamery929 1 June 7, 2009 10:23:48 PM

personally i could see why he would give the job to yasmina. In th elast episode it felt likght all Kate did better than Yasmine was pick her team. Ben came up with the idea, Debra came up with the chocolates and the name. This left Kate to do what she did best. On th eother hand Yasmina seemed to do everything. Lorraines innovation was nowhere to be seen, and Phillip was a constant hinderance. I also felt yasmina answered the question of how will we make a profit much better. Kate said 'I am confidant there will be enough profit for us'. Yasmina said ' These chocolates cost 11p'. Not to mention that she has her own successful business and was the first contestant ever to go 3-0 as PM. In contrast, throughout the show Kate (whose strengths were supposedly Presentation and Sales) managed to give the worst presentation (albeit all the rest were excellent) and also not sell a single thing in one task.

Re: The Apprentice 2009 episode 12 review: the final
Posted By kurtamery929 1 June 7, 2009 10:25:38 PM

Sorry about all the spelling mistakes in that too. It's late and i'm going to bed.

Re: The Apprentice 2009 episode 12 review: the final
Posted By sshspooky 1 June 7, 2009 11:12:48 PM

I disagree with this review entirely. Firstly, a correction, Kate's chocolates had the name Intimate not Impulse before they changed it. Now the chocolates didn't matter. They reiterated this on the You're Hired show. It was about the brand, the packaging, the advertising, the profitability. It was about the business elements, and with that Yasmina's Cocoa Electric ticked all the boxes. Yes, Kate's chocolates tasted better. But they costed more than double, only appealed to couples, and wouldn't be stocked in the mass market. Yes Kate presented better, but Sir Alan doesn't need a good presenter, he needs the full package. Yasmina said this was her first time doing such a big presentation so all things considered she did ok. You must also remember that The Apprentice isn't about who does better on one task, it's about who shows the traits and qualities Sir Alan wants in an Apprentice, and where would each candidate fit in his organisation. This was a good series and I think I agreed with most of his decisions, and the right candidate won.

Re: The Apprentice 2009 episode 12 review: the final
Posted By moakle 1 June 8, 2009 07:51:21 AM

Have to agree with Simon here. Yes the marketing and pricing were spot on with Yasmina's product but I thought the promotional campaign was poor and as the guy from one of the choc companies said, you'd buy them once but would you buy them again? As per usual SrAlan's ideas on business seem completely skewed with much of the rest of the UK - can he honestly say that the product matters not as long as the marketing, pricing etc is OK? As a long-term business strategy that just won't work as it's reputation is shot before it even gets off the ground. Kate's product however brought almost universal praise barring the pricing which could have been sorted had she said 'Fine, we'll sell to niche markets then.' Kate was the better presenter, team leader, better organiser and had the best product. I don't believe for a minute that the majority of people watching last night's show didn't think the wrong candidate won based on how the show had been edited. Yasmina was flailing from the off. Still, great show though and a cracking end to one of the better series to date.

Re: The Apprentice 2009 episode 12 review: the final
Posted By kurtamery929 1 June 8, 2009 08:30:42 AM

what was so great about Kate's idea. it's a box of chocolates that you can share... or not! just like every other box of chocolates, and what was with her during the credit crunch spend a night in with a box of chocolates. There were 18 chocolates. 9 each! even if u eat 1 every ten minutes it's not gonna entertain you for as long as a movie you can rent for 2.50. and as for the niche market, like they said you need credit for that. I'll just pick up a box of thorntons and know i'm getting a good product. So everything wouldn't have been okey cokey because straight away her business has failed. At the end of the day people are more likely to try a product that tastes different (this is after thorough testing) than a product designed for morons who don't know how to count and share out 18 chocolates. Not too mention yasmina hit the nail on the head with the market, she aimed it at everyone. Kate aimed it solely at couples with deep pockets.

Re: The Apprentice 2009 episode 12 review: the final
Posted By simonbrew 1 June 8, 2009 08:42:54 AM

I've corrected the factual error - sorry about that. It was a late night last night :-) In retrospect, and I wrote this piece immediately after the show had finished, my problem is that we didn't see *why* Yasmina won. I have little problem with Sralan choosing who he wants, but the whole point of a 12-week interview process is that we see some logic to his decisions. Yasmina, thoughout the show, has not been edited particularly favourably, and last night, I had no insight at all into why she was chosen. I accept that there were problems with both, but I think the BBC has cheated, here. Sralan is no fool, and he chose who he wanted, that's fine. But I don't think it's unreasonable to expect the show to demonstrate *why* she was the right candidate, and I'm not sure it ever really did.

Re: The Apprentice 2009 episode 12 review: the final
Posted By moakle 1 June 8, 2009 09:31:13 AM

While everyone might share chocolates anyway - not me, I buy my wife her own so I can scoff mine - the point was that the promotion was actually very clever, picking up on something already associated with a product and then producing something specifically designed to cater for that. You clearly feel strongly about it though... Don't see what's wrong about aiming at a niche market for couples with deep pockets either - much of the chocolate market is aimed at a higher-end target.

Re: The Apprentice 2009 episode 12 review: the final
Posted By janey 1 June 8, 2009 04:53:59 PM

I agree that there is a little bit of deception going on with the basis for making the final decision. To say the job rests on the performance in the final task is disingenuous at best. Clearly, the calibre of the two women over the whole series was brought into the boardroom - and I understand they both worked for Surallen for months before the winner was announced, so that also has a massive bearing on the decision. I don't actually think there was that much in it based on the final task. Put simply, Kate's chocolates were way too expensive and Yasmina's tasted like s**t. Neither product (imo) had a strong enough name or identity, although I think Yasmina had the better box. However, a couple of things. I don't believe Kate was changing the name of the product (based on what we saw) until Debra steamrollered her into changing her mind. And 'Intimate' was a terrible, terrible name and would have been laughed out of the launch venue, make no mistake about it. Second, the electric shock thing was a total pass - surely no-one is seriously going to watch that advert and think the chocolates will give you an actual shock? Like Red Bull gives you actual wings? Or Ready Brek actually gives you a radioactive glow?? Anyone who takes a campaign that literally is being willfully naive. I thought Yasmina's replies in the presentation were stronger, she used actual statistics and thought on her feet. From what I saw, Kate didn't do that. She was good with her actual presentation, but not so much with the Q&A, where she relied on a shit-eating grin far too much. Yasmina was PM three times and her team won all three times. That in itself is some credit to her interpersonal, managerial and inspirational skills, and surely goes some way to answering the question of 'how the fuck' she won The Apprentice... Which is not to say I would have been disappointed if Kate had won. But I do understand why he picked Yasmina. Perhaps he could have articulated it a bit better and clarified the point of the actual task, is all.

Re: The Apprentice 2009 episode 12 review: the final
Posted By capt_1ntens0 1 June 9, 2009 12:48:44 PM

Just an idea but I would like to see reviews mention You're Fired as well as the main show next year. This year more than any other series made it clear to me that the You're Fired show, and in particular Adrian Chiles's brilliant hosting, is as much a part of the Apprentice experience as the show itself- at times it actually came close in the entertainment stakes to just beating the main show into a bloody pulp. This season has been almost without fail both hilarious, biting and forces the contestants to laugh at their foibles with some genius editing and features. Sralan himself even complemented the contribution of Adrian and his team, which is no small feat on You're Hired, showing that even he values what has become one of the entertaining tie-in shows on TV. Its part of the experience, if you don't watch it, you are seriously missing out.
Post a Comment
Security Code* Get another image
 
 
Sralan Sugar and his two trust aides...

Sralan Sugar and his two trusted aides...

Untitled Document

Follow Den of Geek on

Related Articles

SEARCH

Coke Zero
Advertisement