Den of Geek

Could 24 survive without Jack Bauer?

Simon Brew


Has Kiefer Sutherland’s Jack Bauer become the best and the worst thing about 24?

Published on Feb 16, 2009

The new season of 24 has been, I’m happy to admit, a very pleasant surprise. I’m not sure I was alone after season six, which got bogged down under too many villains and too many silly narrative strands, in wondering whether the show’s finest days were behind it, but the way that season seven has shot out of the traps, and continues to do so, makes me glad that I stuck with it.

What’s particularly impressive is that the episodes we’re seeing at the moment aren’t the ones that have felt the full benefit of the show’s year off. Right now, we’re still in the midst of the episodes that were in the can when the writers’ strike kicked in at the end of 2007, and these were the ones set to broadcast in January and February 2008.

And while it’s likely that a little bit of behind-the-scenes meddling has taken place with them in the time that the production team has had, it’s nonetheless shown that the show perhaps didn’t need as long a break to get right back on form.

What’s interesting is the mini-reboot that’s taken place, because this is perhaps at the core as to how 24 has recaptured its form. No longer is the show grounded in the workings of an increasing implausible Los Angeles Counter Terrorism Unit (CTU), an establishment that has been blown up, infiltrated and overrun on several occasions over the show’s duration. Now, we’re in the somewhat more grounded surroundings of Washington’s FBI, and this has allowed 24 to replenish its supporting cast (after all, can you imagine the job ad for CTU in 24: ‘High-tech analyst required, usual life expectancy a series and a half. Being held hostage compulsory’).

But there’s still the enigma at the heart of 24 that has to be dealt with at some point. And it’s Kiefer Sutherland as Jack Bauer.

Jack Bauer is the character who, for a long time, has glued 24 together, but it’s surely no coincidence that in the show’s more recent high seasons – most notable the quite brilliant season five – Jack had to be sidelined for us to buy what was going on. After all, is there anyone in any doubt that Jack Bauer is the most indestructible human being on the planet? The man has, quite literally, died in the line of duty, and still that hasn’t managed to kill him.

Sutherland’s contract as Jack Bauer is up at the end of season eight, and talks continue about the possibility of a movie taking up the reigns after that. But, I wonder, has the time come for a splinter of 24 without Jack Bauer at the heart of it? In fact, without any star name whatsoever anywhere near it?

Because right now, 24 – as with many shows before it – has a ringfence around the characters that aren’t allowed to die. It’s Star Trek in fresh clothing. And while that ringfence is tighter than most – surely it’s got Chloe in it, too, and there’s little point killing Tony Almeida again, because that doesn’t work either – it’s still there.

So how about it? How about a 24: New York or something of that ilk, where you genuinely start with a core cast of whom you believe anyone is expendable? Or even better, how about the old Hitchcock trick of pulling in a big star to headline everything, and killing them off in the first act? That way, you destabilise the rest of the series, as the audience simply has no idea who will survive and who won’t. Once the big name is out of the way, it’s fair game, and nobody is safe.

That said, it’s not going to happen, sadly. Because television series need big stars to keep getting recommissioned. Would 24 have lasted this long without Kiefer Sutherland’s name at the top of the credits? Quite probably not. It might have made it through a season or two, but there’s a legion of people who watch 24 for Jack Bauer, and not for a twisty-turning political thriller.

It’s a shame, as the show is better when it’s doing the latter, rather than being the Jack Bauer hour. It’s why, even if there was a 24 spin off, it would still need some kind of big name to get buy-in.

There is one more possibility, which at least has a (very long) sporting chance of coming true, and it would be the biggest rug-pull that the producers had pulled to date. If they were absolutely certain that 24 had reached the end of the road in its current guise, then how about turning Jack Bauer as a big, undercover criminal mastermind? Again, it ain’t going to happen, but I was always taken with the idea from Doctor Who scribe James Moran that Murder She Wrote’s last episode would have been infinitely improved had we gone down to Jessica Fletcher’s basement and seen a stack of corpses. Talk about turning a show entirely on its head…

As it stands, 24 is likely to take the more conventional route where its figurehead hero is concerned, and given how well season seven is panning out, I’d take that right about now. But I still can’t help yearning for something a little more, and a little bit different…

 

Users Comments

Re: Could 24 survive without Jack Bauer?
Posted By cordas 1 February 17, 2009 11:49:42 PM

My 1st thought is "the king is dead, long live the king", Jack needs to die yeah he has been great (and not so great at times) but he is only part of the magic that makes 24 work. I am not saying they can just bump him off tomorrow and move on, I would suggest that they break in 3 or 4 new "lead" characters and then let them battle it out on screen, the new FBI woman seems a good candidate for starters. Either give Jack a heroic death that he can't come back from (maybe diving into a black hole to save the presidents daughters, best friends dog), or have him brutally and obviously killed (head chopped off by terrorists seeking revenge), and then develope the 3-4 replacements slowly whittling the numbers of them down till at the end of season 8 we have the "new Jack". Personally I would avoid the temptation of turning Jack evil... no one would believe it, and if the show stuck to it i think it could kill it. Jack does need to die though, the simple fact he is involved means we know he's gonna win. Given some of the press about 24 I just wonder if they are going to wait till season 8 to kill him....

Re: Could 24 survive without Jack Bauer?
Posted By cordas 1 February 17, 2009 11:53:18 PM

P.S. Why the hell wasn't the new president handed the JB case file as she sat down behind her desk in the oval office for the 1st time? Oh and why hasn't the stupid bint considered a strategic withdrawl of her task force? Why not send the fleet outside the zone, wrap up the problem at home and then turn the fleet around... Or at least tell us why they can't do that!

Re: Could 24 survive without Jack Bauer?
Posted By bobsuncorp 1 February 18, 2009 06:54:06 PM

The problem I have with the idea of a whole new cast where anyone can die/be a mole is that I think the only reason 24 works is that it does have at least one character who is the hero. To be honest I'm not actually worried about a main character dying as I am about them turning into a mole. There is always at least one in every 24 series and they always try and make it shocking which means someone we thought was a good guy. The only reason they can keep getting away with this is if there is one character who is absolutely unimpeachable, and that is Jack Bauer.

Re: Could 24 survive without Jack Bauer?
Posted By cordas 1 February 18, 2009 11:02:42 PM

If it was done my way none of the 3 or 4 would be moles / spies they would all die trying to be "jack" and just not being good enough. I would however put some swerves in of course... it wouldn't be 24 without them. I think to kill jack and then create a "new" jack straight off the bat would sorta cheapen the role.
Post a Comment
 
Can 24 get by without this man?

Can 24 get by without this man?

Follow Den of Geek on

Related Articles

SEARCH

Mobile Phones

LG ArenaHTC Magic

Compare over 250 mobile phones &
52,000 deals!