Den of Geek

Demons episode 4 review

Gemma Reilly


Oh, come on, you painted yourselves into this ‘British Buffy’ corner, don’t try to distance yourselves now by coming up with over-elaborate rubbish like that

ITV's attempt to do Buffy hasn't been going well. Will episode four of Demons manage to pick things up?

Published on Jan 27, 2009

Episode 4: Suckers

Vampires are in town this week, bringing with them some much-needed backstory for Mina and a whole lot of literary references. It was revealed back in Episode 1 that Bram Stoker’s Dracula was not the work of fiction the world believes it to be; with Suckers, the show heads deeper into that mythology.

“They’re not dead,” Galvin explains as he and Luke watch a suspicious-looking chap with a giant mohawk and a zip around his neck load two coffins into a hearse. “They’re undead... Night-stalkers. Blood-ghouls. Nosferatu.” “Vampires?”, says Luke. Nothing gets past him.

The vampires in question are Quincey – a smug yuppie-type in a shiny shirt and gold jewellery – and Anika, whose appearance can best be described as ‘feathery pseudo-Victorian Eurotrash cancan fetish monstrosity’. Spike and Drusilla they’re not, and the less said about their henchman Zippy – a character pitched at an audience too young and/or stupid even for this show – the better.

Unless we’re going back to the Max Schreck era, there are two things your average vampiric villain is supposed to be; menacing and sexy. Sadly, Ciarán McMenamin’s Quincey falls short on both counts; thanks to some dodgy writing, he’s a pouty, glowery sleaze with his head up his own undead backside (though, to be fair to him, this reviewer wouldn’t call someone in a shiny shirt and gold jewellery sexy if you bribed her). Oh yes, and he’s rubbish at bowling.

He does, however, have a mysterious connection to Mina. When they meet, it’s all seductive hand-kissing and the old, “Join me, you belong with me” routine, and it would seem that the two were once lovers.

Back in the 19th century, Mina was repeatedly bitten by Dracula and is potentially the most powerful vampire in the world, but controls her urges by cleansing her blood. “She is one of us,” Galvin warns, “but if she starts behaving differently, we grade her and smite her.”

As Luke engages in some more pointless martial arts training, Galvin flings a bucketload of exposition at the viewers. “Only vampires can kill vampires,” he explains. The usual trappings – stakes, garlic – are ineffectual folk traditions. The only way Luke can defeat Quincey is by obtaining a sample of his DNA, then using electrical currents to stimulate the dead sample back to life, then shooting him with it, thus making him revert to his natural age and consequently killing him.

Eh?! Oh, come on, you painted yourselves into this ‘British Buffy’ corner, don’t try to distance yourselves now by coming up with over-elaborate rubbish like that. Having guns as weapons in a show like this was a misguided idea in the first place; a proper fight is far more entertaining, at least in theory.

Meanwhile, Luke gives Ruby the task of ploughing through the text of Dracula to find clues to Mina’s history; given that Luke is ‘the last Van Helsing’, it’s about time someone thought to do that. What she discovers shocks them both; Quincey isn’t Mina’s ex. He’s her son.

Hang on a minute... Demons, did you just pull off a halfway decent plot twist?!

To anyone who isn’t familiar with the story of Dracula, that was actually pretty unexpected. It also makes all the seductive hand-kissing earlier on really quite creepy, but never mind.

Mina – having already lost her husband Jonathan – turned Quincey into a vampire to save him from dying in a military hospital after WWI. A selfish gesture rather than a merciful one, perhaps, and one that left Quincey feeling pretty resentful. Tsk. Kids.

A rare and welcome scene between Glenister and Tapper, in which Galvin convinces a reluctant Mina that her child must die, illustrates who the real stars of the programme are. Can we just pack Luke and Ruby off on an extended camping trip in the Himalayas and make this ‘The Rupert and Mina Show’, please?

Bizarrely, Luke always seems somewhat peripheral to the story; Galvin points him in the direction of the Demon of the Week and he fights it (briefly), but he never seems to make his own decisions or struggle with any real internal conflict. This episode wouldn’t have suffered at all if he had been completely absent. In fact, it might have made for a better showdown.

With Luke and Galvin held hostage by her son, Mina drinks her own blood in order to confront Quincey as an equal. The character finally comes into her own as an all-powerful vamp; she moves ‘faster than a New York minute’, she’s a strong fighter and her sight is temporarily restored.

Then, as if the writer suddenly realised that the main character should probably contribute to this episode in some way, Luke shoots Quincey, rendering vamp-Mina irrelevant. Yet again, the fight ends just as it was becoming interesting.

Suckers; is perhaps the strongest episode of this series to date. Given that it’s still riddled with flaws, unlikeable characters and dodgy accents however, that’s not saying very much.

Episode 1: They Bite
Episode 2: The Whole Enchilada
Episode 3: Saving Grace
Episode 4: Suckers
Episode 5: Smitten
Episode 6: Nothing Like Nebraska

28 January 2009

 

Users Comments

Re: Demons episode 4 review
Posted By cordas 1 January 31, 2009 02:10:12 AM

Damn these lousy script writers... they show the very rare glimpse of talent but burry it under huge amounts of bull droppings. Glenister carries the show easily, Mina showed for the 1st time some flashes of intrest. I dunno but I kinda like Ruby, or more the actress seems prepared to run with the drivel she has been given. Luke *MEH* as the supposed lead of the show he really should do more than pout. I can't understand how someone didn't look at the scripts and kick them... What happened to the whole "we don't name them, we just grade and smite" grabage? If you are going to throw lines like that in then you really need to stick to that idea (lousy as it is).

Re: Demons episode 4 review
Posted By dergolem 1 January 31, 2009 07:05:17 PM

I really want to like this show. After the travesty that was Merlin, (I didn't get past the second half of episode two) and the expectation of a weekly dose of Phil Glenister (I miss Gene Hunt terribly), I thought this might be fun. But it's all about pacing. The show feels sluggish, as if it's being held back. And that's down to the writers and the director. I actually enjoyed this episode, lots of backstory. I agree that Luke is a waste of valuable air space, but Ruby is shaping up quite nicely. Sidekicks are tricky: you either get a Willow who develops over time or a Thelma who comes out of the gate at a full gallop. Ruby is finding her place in the gang and once they release her from the bonds of the doe-eyed crush on Luke, she could turn in to a really interesting character. As we say over here: "Let's get the lead out people!"

Re: Demons episode 4 review
Posted By LizLemon 1 February 2, 2009 01:53:08 PM

All I can say is I enjoy your entertaining reviews far more than my one attempt at watching this abysmal show! I hope you have the stomach to stick with it, Gemma, as I plan to read every review you write despite the fact I've given the show the big heave-ho from my scheduled viewing list. :cD
Post a Comment
Security Code* Get another image
 
 
Demons

Life On Demons

Untitled Document

Follow Den of Geek on

Related Articles

SEARCH

Coke Zero
Advertisement