Anchorman 2 review

Review Ryan Lambie 16 Dec 2013 - 17:00

Will Ferrell returns as the oafish news reader Ron Burgundy in Anchorman 2. Here's our review...

What exactly was it that made Anchorman funny? If you’re one of those people who hated it, the answer is probably a simple “nothing”. But if you’re among the 2004 comedy’s sizeable cult following, you could say that it was its off-the-cuff sense of creativity. Partly improvised and almost entirely devoid of plot, 2004‘s Anchorman was a true diamond in the rough: an unpredictable comedy about a pompous news reader bumbling his way through the 1970s, jazz flute in hand.

Ron Burgundy’s since become one of Will Ferrell’s most beloved characters, and while Paramount was reluctant to finance a sequel for many years, the persistence of Adam McKay and Anchorman’s cast - not to mention a devoted following of fans - have ultimately led to Anchorman 2.

Taking place in the early 80s (one snippet of dialogue suggests that it’s 1980, but several gags suggest that it might be a bit later), Anchorman 2 sees husband and wife news reading duo Ron Burgundy and Veronica Corningstone (a returning Christina Applegate) relocated to WBC News in Manhattan. But when Veronica’s given a promotion and Ron’s fired (on account of being “the worst news anchor in the world” according to a fun surprise cameo), Ron relocates to fledgling news network GNN - a station with the far-out idea of providing 24 hours of constant rolling news reports.

Burgundy, keen to get to the number one spot in the ratings in order to get back at his now estranged wife, gathers up his old news team - Brian Fantana (Paul Rudd), Champ Kind (David Koechner) and Brick Tamland (Steve Carrell) - and sets about bringing America a different form of journalism: news as entertainment, with all the police chases, cute animals and salacious gossip he can find.

The original Anchorman tried dozens of ideas before the finished product was found in the final edit - the left-over plot strands and scenes, like a gang of serial bank thieves called The Alarm Clock, were so numerous, a second, straight-to-DVD film (Wake Up, Ron Burgundy) was assembled from the off-cuts. Anchorman 2 feels like an effort to reverse-engineer what it was that worked in the original film, and like a joke that becomes less funny the more it’s explained, this sequel doesn’t manage to hit its mark quite as often as the first Anchorman. While there are plenty of scenes that are sure to have all but the stuffiest audience members guffawing - the strange jobs Burgundy and his news team get up to between TV gigs are really something - there are also several jokes that simply fall flat.

There’s also a worrying insistence on either reprising old gags and putting a slightly different spin on them, or worse, relying on easy laughs by referencing back to moments from 2004 - such scenes are likely to leave newcomers mystified, and returning fans smiling indulgently, but little else. Then there are portions of the film that could be interpreted as mean-spirited or even in outright bad taste, which is strange, considering how essentially good-natured the original Anchorman was.

That, at least, is the bad news. The good news is that, when Anchorman 2 works, it works extremely well. Steve Carrell is a delight as always, and even though this new incarnation of Brick is borderline feral at times, the character remains an adorable creation. He even gets a love interest of his own - Kristen Wiig's Chani, who’s possibly the most inept secretary in history - and the film could possibly have withstood more of their bizarrely awkward romance.

There’s less for Brian and Champ to do overall, but the moments they do get are good value, and the latter’s nickname for bats might just win the prize for most quotable line in the entire film. Focusing so intently on Burgundy and his strange changes in fortune, from a toe-curling romance with a ferociously forthright African-American boss (played by Meagan Good) to fairly predictable fall from grace, may push other characters out of the picture, but at least Ferrell’s protagonist is as bumptious and idiotic as he ever was.

This is just as well, since quite a few of the new characters feel like straight replacements for the old ones. James Marsden’s suave rival anchor Jack Lime stands for the original film’s Wes Mantooth; Meagan Good’s Linda Jackson replaces Veronica Corningstone for much of the story, while GNN producer Freddie (Dylan Baker) is a stand-in for the great Fred Willard’s Ed Harken.

Returning director Adam McKay manages to get a fairly current message about modern TV news in here, with a clear and funny swipe at Rupert Murdoch, and some satirical moments which are actually quite incisive. But really, Anchorman was always at its best when it was at its most frivolous and unpredictable, like the aimless conversations over lunch or the gratuitous a cappella songs.

The moments that manage to recreate that same sense of invention are, unsurprisingly, the most successful, like an entirely disposable moment where a group of characters are collectively reading the same comic book and unapologetically laughing at it. On paper, it sounds like nothing at all, but on the screen, in the moment, it absolutely works - and it’s here, in these scenes, that the slippery secret behind Anchorman’s success hides in plain sight.

Anchorman was funny because its slipped so perfectly between outright improvisation and scenes that clearly had to be planned, yet also felt as though they were made up on the spot. Anchorman 2, by contrast, mislays some of the first film’s sense of freshness and creativity, and tries to compensate by being louder and more over the top. Thankfully, the old Burgundy magic still bubbles back to the surface in Anchorman 2's more intimate, character-based scenes, and it's these that are sure to leave audiences in stitches.  

Anchorman 2 is out in UK cinemas on the 18th December.

Follow our Twitter feed for faster news and bad jokes right here. And be our Facebook chum here.


Disqus - noscript

It's great to see Ferrell doing good in a film, I'm looking forward to seeing this more than The Other Guys.

I would have given 4 stars I think. 5/5 on the comedy front, but it let itself down on a lack of any real story. Plus about 30 minutes in the middle felt dragged out (ice skating and the result all felt pointless). But for me, it's not meant to be any more than a comedy, which it is. So 4/5

So 40% of the time........

I have an unlimited hatred for The Other Guys, it was an awful film and I cannot sit through it.
Such a shame because I love Will Ferrell and Mark Wahlberg.

I really liked it, it's the kind of comedy that I enjoy. I can't really put a finger on it, it just made me laugh. :)

I thought it was terrible. Laughs were too few and far between, and many of the gags fell horribly flat, the aforementioned dinner party scene, and the entire blindness subplot. And for a lot of the gags they relied on past glories. It screamed 'Hey, remember that bit you loved in the original? Well here it is to the nth degree. HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!' to me.

The funniest parts were Brick's non-sequiturs (the 'no legs' scene was terrific, as was the funeral bit) and...uh, no that's about it.

2 stars, and that's being generous.

I love The Other Guys. "You learned to dance like that SARCASTICALLY?"

Saw it last night and was slightly underwhelmed. I still laughed quite a bit, but a reliance on rehashed gags from the original was a bit disappointing. The huge dust up at the end between all the Anchormen and women was a random delight of a scene in the first one, whereas here it just comes back bigger and with more cameos, but doesn't really go anywhere.

The whole blind plot was just bizarre and added way too much to the overall running time for me (why can't Apatow productions EDIT their movies?!), and after a strong start I felt it kind of fizzled out. Brick was great but I preferred it when he was just a random non-sequiteur of a character, and the focus was far too much on Burgundy to the detriment of the rest of the news team and Fred Willard, who I think got about two scenes!

I'd say three stars is about right, I doubt it will enjoy the sheer rewatchability of the first film.

Abrupt ending, no outtakes. Poor show. Rest of the film needed at least twenty mins cut. It had a few decent chuckles and it's definitely worth a go, but the only people laughing regularly throughout were teenagers and simple folk who laugh with 'u's and 'r's instead of 'a's. "Hurhurhur".

I think it's Saturday Night Live syndrome. They're only half as funny when they've grown twice as many chins.

Regarding the fight scene near the end, two words. Casino Royale. The Peter Sellers/Woody Allen one.

The film could of done without the twenty minute Ron's blind segment - I like very slightly controversial stuff but it was a step too far for me. However "It's actually African-American, not African and American." quip, Brick's surprise intelligent piece of deep wisdom and the Australian head of the show's speech, "I got here completely off my own back, my Dad gave me Three Million Dollars and I have worked tirelessly to turn that into...Three Point Five Million Dollars(!)."...where all genius, don't worry so many other things were as well - it was for me a laugh a minute film and - excluding the blind segment - every joke worked. To end honestly though it was great to see our favourites back...but another film would spoil the good conclusion that's now been reached.




Sponsored Links