Den of Geek

The casting of Superman: a geek’s response

James Hunt


The idea that you might cast someone more popular, or with inherent drawing power, is easily dismissed. In a Superman film, the actor should not overshadow the icon.

Henry Cavill may officially be the next actor to don the Superman costume, but is he right for the role? Here’s James’ opinion...

Published on Feb 1, 2011

The casting of a new Superman has the potential to be a huge moment in any geek's week, but with the character's stock damaged following the underachieving Superman Returns, it's hard not to be a little cautious about it.

The geeks' choice was undoubtedly Jon Hamm, an actor whose performance as Don Draper in Mad Man already shares much with the Man of Steel, a lonely individual, disconnected from his past, possessing gentle inner strength and leading a double (occasionally triple) life. All you'd have to do is put a cowlick in his hair and you're virtually looking at Superman already.

However, many, including Hamm, for that matter, considered him too old for the role. Which begs the question: how old is too old? This is a story about a super man, after all. If anything, the concern should be casting someone too young (something that didn't bother previous director Bryan Singer, who chose an actor younger than Tom Welling, who was still playing 'Superboy' over in Smallville.)

A character like Superman doesn't just rely on his strength and powers to inspire people, but his experience, empathy and, to some extent, authority. The marketable appeal of actors in their mid-20s is easy to understand, but we'll know the time has come for movies to treat Superman seriously when a director dares to cast someone in their 30s in the title role. Someone with the gravitas and life experience to make you believe he knows what he's talking about.

Still, maybe Henry Cavill can adequately pretend. That's what he's paid to do, after all. Bearing the constraints of the industry in mind, Cavill does seem like a good choice. In particular, his relative obscurity works for him the same way Brandon Routh's did. The idea that you might cast someone more popular, or with inherent drawing power, is easily dismissed. In a Superman film, the actor should not overshadow the icon.

This is because the Superman story is, at its heart, about an outsider showing us how good we can be. The last thing you want in the role is an ‘insider'. As much as the much-rumoured Nic Cage Superman would have been a true sight to behold (whatever your opinion of The Cage!), it would have given Superman the wrong power balance. Just because he can fly, it doesn't mean he gets to talk down to us mortals. That's sort of the point.

Casting someone on his way up, rather than someone at the top, neatly sidesteps that concern that we might find Superman's message trite, patronising and self-inflated. We already know we'll never be Nic Cage, but watching Cavill step forward and make the role his own would remind us that even the best of us was a nobody once.

Of course, it all depends on what the story is, and as yet, there are no details. One can only hope that Zack Snyder shies away from J. Michael Straczynski's recent Superman: Earth One as a template, particularly given the faithful manner in which he translated 300 and Watchmen to the screen.

Clearly written with the intention of giving Superman's origin a cinematic reboot, Earth One features a Superman initially more interested in earning the big bucks than saving humanity, and a woeful villain in the form of alien general Tyrell, who brings an alien fleet to Earth looking for the last son of Krypton in order to fulfil the terms of his demolition contract.

You know a re-telling of the Superman origin has taken a wrong turn when it ends with the edict "Avenge the death of Krypton!", and the hoody-wearing sulky version of the character that permeates Straczynski's comic is worryingly present in the mind when you consider that Cavill was Stephenie Meyer's first choice for moody sulky Edward Cullen in the Twilight films. Let's hope it's a coincidence.

Still, the casting of a new Superman is but the first of the many hurdles that a Superman director has to leap. Snyder has arguably cleared this one without much trouble. Nothing about Cavill screams 'mistake'. We just have to hope Snyder knows how to use him better than Bryan Singer used, or rather, didn't use, Brandon Routh.

See Also:

Follow Den Of Geek on Twitter right here.

 

Tags

Users Comments

Re: The casting of Superman: a geek’s response
Posted By stuxmusic 1 February 1, 2011 11:16:53 AM

I just hope we get some classic score in there.

Re: The casting of Superman: a geek’s response
Posted By idleprimate 1 February 1, 2011 11:25:51 AM

your the first i have come across to point this basic flaw out, that this guy could perhaps approach superboy, but not superman. same problem with routh. i actually like smallville, or at least i admired the first several seasons and now just watch it cuz i am a geek. but we don't need another cinematic origin, please dear god don't go that way. so we need a mature, manish looking superman. reeves was perfect because he was neither young nor weathered, just an alien square jawed man. i have no suggestion for the right image. nowadays everyone is a perpetual fey youth, or else a very weathered man. what happened to the stage between youth and agedness?

Re: The casting of Superman: a geek’s response
Posted By _mart_ 1 February 1, 2011 01:21:23 PM

I think it would be actually a great idea to see older Superman (I'm not sure if he gets old, I have read only some comics) or Batman. For example Batman who is in his 50s or 60s, who isn't maybe as fast or strong as he was before, but is a lot smarter.

Re: The casting of Superman: a geek’s response
Posted By DavidFullam 1 February 1, 2011 02:32:56 PM

Agreed. Please no Superman-Earth One. I sincerely hope that the man can pull off the very hard duality of Clark Kent and Superman. Chris Reeve could do it, not many can. I wish him well.

Re: The casting of Superman: a geek’s response
Posted By DrMorbius 1 February 1, 2011 05:31:17 PM

I do not see anything that explains why this fits more the role than Brandon Routh. Let's hope the villain has at least some personality.

Re: The casting of Superman: a geek’s response
Posted By GoblinKing 1 February 2, 2011 10:04:31 AM

I may be in the minority here, but I thought Superman Returns was a great successor to the Christopher Reeve glory days (III and IV aside). I also thought Brandon Routh did a fantastic job of delivering The Man of Tomorrow, while hiding beneath the mundane veneer of Clark, a man of today. The 'Lex Continent' storyline wasn't the best, but I feel Routh gets an undeservedly tough press because of that. [For the record - I agree with your point on casting an older Superman, 30+ heroes are disappearing from our screens, particularly female 30+ heroes/heroines]

Re: The casting of Superman: a geek’s response
Posted By Pukerama 1 February 3, 2011 02:29:11 AM

Agreed 100% with GoblinKing, loved Superman Returns and I thought Brandon Routh was just fine. In fact I'm a little disappointed he wasn't given a second chance. On the flip side I'm sooo relieved they did not cast Jon Hamm, besides being too old, he's a borderline big time actor who might, as the article says "overshadow the icon."

Re: The casting of Superman: a geek’s response
Posted By wynne 1 February 7, 2011 08:05:26 AM

Certain actors, despite being too young to justify their ability to do so, can pull off the "older and wiser" gravitas perfectly and utterly convincingly. Cavill may just be such a man (Having never seen him act before, I'm withholding judgement). Frankly, I'm more concerned that a) Snyder will stylize it too much (Please, God, let it not be stylized like 300 and Suckerpunch), or b) Cavill, Snyder, or both will try to make Supes too much like Reeve. Reeve was excellent, but trying to imitate him was a good part of where Superman Returns went wrong. You can't get out of his shadow unless you try something different. Also, I wish they'd stop trying to make the Clark side of Supes a complete imbecile, which is my one problem with Reeve's portrayal. Batman might consider himself Batman first and Bruce Wayne second, but Superman generally considers himself Clark first and Superman second. How can he become a top reporter if he's too timid call out someone who cuts the line? Part of what makes George Reeves' Superman from the 50's so good is that his Clark is just as bold as his Superman, if not more so. */end soapbox
Post a Comment
Security Code* Get another image
 
 
Henry Cavill is the next Superman
Untitled Document

Follow Den of Geek on

Related Articles

SEARCH

Coke Zero
Advertisement