
Archive
Halloween recommendations: Night of the Living Dead 1990
Ron Hogan
Ron admits that not all remakes are bad, after all...
Published on Oct 30, 2007
Then, of course, I go out and see the remake.
Now, I know why I do this. Most remakes suck (so do most sequels). It’s a very rare, notable occasion that the remake of a film comes even close to matching, let alone besting, the original story, but my underappreciated film is the rare remake that is both faithful to the original story, and as good (or perhaps better) than the original.
The original Night of the Living Dead is a landmark in cinema. It launched a genre, after all, and was one of the first movies to feature a racially mixed cast with a black male as the hero. Unfortunately, it also has a stereotypical (but probably realistic, considering she watched her brother get killed by a corpse) hysterical female lead character, mediocre zombie makeup, and a shoestring budget.
I know you’re familiar with the original Night of the Living Dead, in which the dead inexplicably come back to live and shamble around in groups, killing the living and consuming chunks of them. Then the people who have been killed by zombies rise from the dead and become zombies themselves, continuing the pattern of killing and munching. A diverse crew of survivors barricades themselves into a farmhouse and must confront both the undead threat outside the door and the human threat inside the door in their attempts to survive the night.
So why do I say this is an underappreciated horror film? Well, glancing at the IMDB, Night of the Living Dead 1990 is rated as 6.4 out of 10, while the original Night of the Living Dead is a 7.9. Night of the Living Dead is a staple of all those Halloween anthology shows dedicated to scary moments, but Night of the Living Dead 1990 is rarely, if ever, mentioned despite better special effects.
The script for Night of the Living Dead ’90 has improved as well, restoring some of Romero’s original scenes (including a zombie lynching cut due to racial tension in 1960’s America) and adding some of his ideas that were removed from the original film. Barbara gets a much-needed update as well, transforming from a frightened mouse to an ass-kickingly strong woman. Some plot holes are filled, some scenes are tightened, and a new twist ending is supplied.
The cast itself has undergone a drastic improvement as well. The cast of Night of the Living Dead 1990 is filled out by horror and b-movie veterans like Tom Towles (Harry Cooper, better known as Otis from Henry Portrait of a Serial Killer or Sheriff Wydell from House of 1000 Corpses and The Devil’s Rejects), Bill Moseley (Johnnie, better known as Chop Top from Texas Chainsaw Massacre 2 and Otis from The Devil’s Rejects and House of 1000 Corpses), William Butler (Tom, who has been in Ghoulies II, Leatherface: Texas Chainsaw Massacre III, and Friday the 13th Part VII, among others), and Tony Todd (Ben, better known as Candyman). Even Patricia Tallman, as the new Barbara, had a bunch of credits to her name, particularly from Babylon 5.
Night of the Living Dead ‘90 doesn’t break any new ground. It doesn’t have to. It takes the source material and updated it while still being respectful to the legacy of the original. That’s about all you can ask of a remake. Well, that and a bigger budget, better acting, and improved gore effects. Night of the Living Dead ’90 delivers on all of these things in spades.
Don’t be afraid to check it out. It’s one of the rare good remakes.
Tags
Users Comments
Re: Halloween recommendations: Night of the Living Dead 1990
Posted By cjlines 1 October 30, 2007 12:07:13 PM
This got a 6.4 on IMDB? That's a travesty. It doesn't even deserve a 4.6!
Actually, one of the things that annoyed me the most was Barbara's transformation from near-mute woman in deep shock (as I think most of us would be if we'd seen our beloved brother torn to pieces by a walking corpse) to some kind of gung ho action hero.
The cast and the gore FX are both nice, I'll agree, but it's devoid of the atmosphere, tension and characterisation that made the first one so effective.
Re: Halloween recommendations: Night of the Living Dead 1990
Posted By twosheds 1 October 30, 2007 12:27:20 PM
Got to agree with this - this version is lacking in energy and direction in places but definitely worth a look; hard to understand why it's so overlooked.
Re: Halloween recommendations: Night of the Living Dead 1990
Posted By RonHogan 1 October 30, 2007 03:46:51 PM
I didn't mind the change in Barbara, if only because it made her significantly less annoying. Why is it that only Ben, who'd been through as much as anyone, should be a gung-ho action hero?
Re: Halloween recommendations: Night of the Living Dead 1990
Posted By RonHogan 1 October 30, 2007 03:57:17 PM
I could see the argument about the lack of atmosphere, as it does lose something going into color stock from the grainy black and white, but I don't think it suffers any more from a lack of energy or characterization than the original might have.
Different actors make different choices. I don't see Tom Towles Harry Cooper as being much different from Karl Hardman's, for example. Except Hardman's seemed more racist against Ben and Towles' more arrogant and domineering towards everyone.
Post a Comment
He's behind youuuu...
Related Articles
- The 2012 BAFTAs: our thoughts, and the full list of winners
- What Red Scorpion can teach us about guerrilla combat
- First footage arrives for Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter
- Ridley Scott set to Direct Cormac McCarthy’s The Counsellor
- Mark Neveldine interview: Ghost Rider: Spirit Of Vengeance, flaming skulls, and breaking Marvel’s rules
- The current state of the Evil Dead remake
- Extremely Loud And Incredibly Close review
- Dracula: Year Zero back in production
- Is this the definitive proof that Han Solo was supposed to shoot first?


