Den of Geek

Transformers 3: not in 3D after all?

Simon Brew


Michael Bay has been voicing his opinions about the plans to turn Transformers 3 into a 3D movie. He doesn’t sound too pleased about it, either…

Published on Mar 24, 2010

Yesterday, we rounded up a collection of the latest stories surrounding the upcoming third Transformers movie. They're right here if you want to read them.

However, the one thing we didn't touch on was the plans to make the movie in 3D. Various options had been reported a while back, with Michael Bay revealing that he was trying to upcovert some footage from the earlier films to see how well it works. According to a new report up at Deadline Hollywood, ‘not very well' would appear to be the answer.

In an interesting piece over at the site, Bay revealed, "I shoot complicated stuff, I put real elements into action scenes and honestly, I am not sold right now on the conversion process." Bay had been looking into shooting with 3D cameras, but wasn't sold at all considering the pace of the action he likes to put on film. Inevitably, he's this been leaned on by Paramount/DreamWorks to allow a retrofit once the film is in the can.

However, Bay appears to be holding out. "I am trying to be sold, and some companies are still working on the shots I gave them. Right now, it looks like fake 3D, with layers that are very apparent. You go to the screening room, you are hoping to be thrilled, and you're thinking, huh, this kind of sucks. People can say whatever they want about my movies, but they are technically precise, and if this isn't going to be excellent, I don't want to do it. And it is my choice."

The more he talks about it, too, the more we find ourselves oddly warming to him. In particular, his comments on upconverting already shot footage are bang on the mark for us. "This conversion process is always going to be inferior to shooting in real 3D," he said. "Studios might be willing to sacrifice the look and use the gimmick to make $3 more a ticket, but I'm not. Avatar took four years. You can't just shit out a 3D movie. I'm saying, the jury is still out."

Blimey.

You can read the full article here, and Transformers 3 - seemingly without 3D - will be arriving in the summer of 2011.

 

Tags

Users Comments

Re: Transformers 3: not in 3D after all?
Posted By madpinkdog 1 March 24, 2010 10:46:04 AM

I'm not a Bay dissenter, I appreciate his films for their turn off your brain and eat popcorn quality, but I am surprised and impressed by his statements regarding 3D as they show a level of artistic integrity I didn't think the man would be capable of. Good on him.

Re: Transformers 3: not in 3D after all?
Posted By MadProphet 1 March 24, 2010 10:48:34 AM

I'm at odds with my own brain here. I can applaud James Cameron's similar comments today, but Michael Bay is barely a porn director. Transformers 3 will still suck the big one.

Re: Transformers 3: not in 3D after all?
Posted By cordas2 1 March 24, 2010 10:49:00 AM

"You can't just shit out a 3D movie. I'm saying, the jury is still out." but you can shit out 2d movies.... I suppose it just means he wants his 'technically precise' movies to be shit by design rather than because some studio execs and accountants want to rake in a few extra $$$.

Re: Transformers 3: not in 3D after all?
Posted By Nocturne 1 March 24, 2010 11:34:06 AM

Maybe he'll threaten to walk just like he did when the first one only came out on HD-DVD. He didn't keep his promise on that one either did he! and I take it when he says complicated stuff he isn't referring to the story!

Re: Transformers 3: not in 3D after all?
Posted By RobGordon23 1 March 24, 2010 05:07:33 PM

My God, Michael Bay just made sense!! We don't need to wait for to see if the world ends in 2012, it's going to implode any second now...
Post a Comment
Security Code* Get another image
 
 
Michael Bay on Transformers (2007)
Untitled Document

Follow Den of Geek on

Related Articles

SEARCH

Coke Zero
Advertisement