Den of Geek

Is Columbia trying to push Ivan Reitman off Ghostbusters 3?

Simon Brew


With Ghostbusters 3 set to go into production later this year, reports are circling over whether Ivan Reitman will be directing or not...

Published on Mar 18, 2010

An interesting story has arisen at tbe Vulture blog which suggests that things might not all be well on the good ship Ghostbusters 3.

The current status of the project is that a fresh draft of the screenplay is expected in the next couple of months, with the idea being to press ahead with production later this year, in time for a summer 2011 release we're guessing (although don't rule out winter). Some of the original cast are returning, but the plan is to bring in a new collection of Ghostbusters, who will be trained by the old crowd.

However, there's now some confusion over the choice of director for the project. It had been revealed that the director of the original, Ivan Reitman, was set to helm the film, but reports circulating today suggest that he's far from Columbia's ideal choice. In fact, it might be that Columbia has no choice but to hire Reitman, off the back of a deal he struck in the early 1980s with the studio.

Reitman's contract, according to Vulture, gives him "exceptional creative control over the series, including director approval". And given that this deal has been in stone for over two decades, that's not giving Columbia much room for leverage at all.

Vulture sums up Columbia's problem with the following quote from an unnamed insider: "while it's true that Reitman can't force Columbia to make Ghostbusters III with him, he can make it nearly impossible for the studio to make the film without him."

Reitman's apparently not the only one with a powerful deal, either. The site reports that Harold Ramis, Bill Murray and Dan Aykroyd all potentially have the power to kill the project if they don't like the direction it's going.

It's believed that Columbia's preferred way forward is with a younger director, perhaps understandable given that Reitman's last film was, er, My Super Ex-Girlfriend. But it doesn't realistically seem to have the power to push Reitman off the film, and instead needs him to walk away. There's a slight chance of that, given that he's just got the go-ahead for a new comedy with Paramount called Friends With Benefits. Reitman, however, is apparently keen to direct both this and Ghostbusters III.

It sounds like a bit of a mess without an easy answer, and we'll keep you posted as to how it all pans out. In the meantime, the Vulture report goes into a lot more detail here.

 

Tags

Users Comments

Re: Is Columbia trying to push Ivan Reitman off Ghostbusters 3?
Posted By Modestgaz 1 March 18, 2010 10:47:13 AM

Please dont make this!

Re: Is Columbia trying to push Ivan Reitman off Ghostbusters 3?
Posted By bobajim 1 March 18, 2010 11:40:18 AM

Yeah Modestgaz, you tell 'em. The very best we can hope for is a huge disappointment. Or Ghostbusters 2 in other words.

Re: Is Columbia trying to push Ivan Reitman off Ghostbusters 3?
Posted By benheck 1 March 18, 2010 03:31:56 PM

While they just shouldn't make it period (or MIB3) I agree with Columbia that Reitman shouldn't direct if they do. He hasn't been good in nearly 2 decades, and even in his heyday couldn't create a decent Ghostbusters sequel. At least with a new young director there's a chance to breathe life into it.

Re: Is Columbia trying to push Ivan Reitman off Ghostbusters 3?
Posted By FrenkyA9 1 March 18, 2010 03:35:16 PM

That's a fascinating stand-off: the leads all have the power to kill the project, while Reitman holds an ace card from a 1980s deal. It amazes me even more that the studio doesn't dispute such an old contract!! Still, the instant brand recognition alone validates a proper sequel.

Re: Is Columbia trying to push Ivan Reitman off Ghostbusters 3?
Posted By DavidFullam 1 March 18, 2010 03:53:22 PM

Add me to the list of those who do not want a third chapter. So much time has gone by, just let it go and let us remember the classic first film.

Re: Is Columbia trying to push Ivan Reitman off Ghostbusters 3?
Posted By KWillyvox 1 March 18, 2010 07:51:05 PM

Why not make it? It appears that the entire creative core of this film can red light the project. Doesn't mean it'll be good, but at least they can blame themselves if it's bad.

Re: Is Columbia trying to push Ivan Reitman off Ghostbusters 3?
Posted By rabbitc 1 March 19, 2010 11:15:30 AM

Funny enough - I hated the sequel when it came out but having watched it again just recently, I was laughing out loud. The second film didn't have enough traditional 'bustin' which is why most fans hate it - but it was decently written - especially if you compare it to the shovelpile of comedy crap that gets released nowadays.

Re: Is Columbia trying to push Ivan Reitman off Ghostbusters 3?
Posted By Interference 1 March 20, 2010 11:31:59 PM

I have a great amount of time for the second film. The pink slime in the bath had equal pegging in my nightmares with the library ghost screaming. If they cast the new guys well, it might be OK. And by well, I don't mean fucking sia lebouf (or whatever the prick's name is). How about some genuinely funny guys taking over? Not just teen lookers, please.

Re: Is Columbia trying to push Ivan Reitman off Ghostbusters 3?
Posted By stuxmusic 1 March 22, 2010 01:08:51 AM

I am well up for this as long as they have the right team for the job. And don't give me the guff that Ghostbusters 2 was rubbish because it wasn't. It was great!
Post a Comment
Security Code* Get another image
 
 
Ghostbusters
Untitled Document

Follow Den of Geek on

Related Articles

SEARCH

Coke Zero
Advertisement