Den of Geek

Chris Weitz turns down Twilight Breaking Dawn?

Simon Brew


The fourth Twilight movie is set to go before the cameras later this year. But we’re no clear to finding out who’s directing Robert Pattinson and Kristen Stewart this time…

Published on Mar 8, 2010

Now that we pretty much know that the final book in the Twilight saga, Breaking Dawn, is being broken into two movies (it's not been confirmed, but there are few who don't expect it to happen), arguably the big question remaining is just who Summit Entertainment is going to rope in to direct them.

It's easy enough to rule out Catherine Hardwicke, who helmed the first movie, as she's now looking to do The Girl With The Red Riding Hood with Amanda Seyfried (also, it does seem that she and Summit aren't best of chums). David Slade, who's putting the finishing touches to Twilight: Eclipse, is not someone Summit appears keen to re-recruit either.

Yet, Chris Weitz, the man who steered the ship on Twilight: New Moon, has been near the top of most people's list to at least take on one of the Breaking Dawn movies. However, that idea now appears dead, as the director himself has ruled himself out of the running.

"Of course I'm interested," he told MTV. "But I think I'm on record saying I have a 2-and-a-half-year-old son."

"Because it'd be such a long shoot for 'Breaking Dawn', it kind of brings me to the edge of my physical and mental endurance. And I just don't believe I have it in me, and I think that it's appropriate that someone else go ahead and do it."

Summit's search, therefore, continues. We'd like it to take the kind of gambles that Warner Bros eventually started taking with its Harry Potter movies, ideally, but given how crucial the Twilight saga is to the fabric of Summit Entertainment, don't be surprised if it goes for a safe choice.

We wonder what Mr Ratner is doing?

MTV

 

Tags

Users Comments

Re: Chris Weitz turns down Twilight Breaking Dawn?
Posted By marcela 1 March 8, 2010 08:55:51 AM

i don't think that chris should do breaking dawn anyway. i was disappointed with new moon, as it did not capture some of the major parts of the book, espeacially after, bella returns with edward. i liked catherine more in twilight as she captured the passion, and chemistry between the characters. breaking dawn is crutial to the saga, and one of the more detailed books, which needs to be transfered onto film in the same manner. no matter who does the film, PLEASE capture ALL the main parts of the book, and dont hesitate with the scenes, if teenagers read the book, they got more detail in that then what they may see.

Re: Chris Weitz turns down Twilight Breaking Dawn?
Posted By Robmac 1 March 8, 2010 09:38:33 AM

Get Rob Bowman to direct - Look at his past work such as Elektra, as that was also mostly shot in a forest, had an attactive cast and also made you want to get up, walk out of the cinema, get a plane ticket to the directors house, knock on there door and shout at them in your loudest voice - 'I WANT THE TWO HOURS OF MY LIFE BACK YOU JUST STOLE FROM ME FOR THE TIME I HAVE WASTED WATCING YOUR EFFORT TO TRY AND TAKE ANY AND ALL ENJOYMENT OUT OF CINEMA AND THE SUBJECT MATTER YOU HAD TO WORK WITH - MY GOD HELEN KELLER COULD ADD MORE VISUAL APPEAL THAN YOU DID TO YOUR WORK' then poke him really hard in the face...with a sharp stick.

Re: Chris Weitz turns down Twilight Breaking Dawn?
Posted By amalthea1983 1 March 8, 2010 01:11:23 PM

lol @ Robmac
Post a Comment
Security Code* Get another image
 
 
Breaking Dawn

Breaking Dawn, the fourth and final novel in the Twilight Saga

Untitled Document

Follow Den of Geek on

Related Articles

SEARCH

Coke Zero
Advertisement