Den of Geek

The problem with music biopics

Simon Brew


As a biopic of Kurt Cobain moves into gear, we brace ourselves for another film that conforms to a very predictable template…

Published on Feb 19, 2010

The tragic suicide of Kurt Cobain back in 1994 was, whether you liked the music of Nirvana or not, a significant day in the world of music. Some may love his work, some may argue that it still has ramifications through music right now, and some won't give two hoots. But his death was a tragic story, bringing a genuine musical talent to a premature end.

Yesterday, it was announced that a biopic of Kurt Cobain was being put into production by Universal Pictures. It's going to be directed by Oren Moverman, who helmed the Oscar-nominated The Messengers, and David Benioff (Troy, X-Men Origins: Wolverine, American History X) will be providing the script (which he started back in 2007). The film is going to be loosely based around Cobain's autobiography, Heavier Than Heaven, and while there's no word on when cameras will roll, the appointment of a director tends to confirm that it won't be long.

But can I be churlish and cite a bit of a problem here? And I appreciate this harks back to the idea of complaining that the crimes on Crimewatch aren't interesting enough. But that's that biopics of musicians have a horrible habit of conforming to a very strict template. Sure, they tend to be award magnets for those concerned (heck, name us any other way Reese Witherspoon would have got an Oscar, and that's from someone who generally quite likes lots of her films), but when it comes to the narrative structure, you generally know exactly what you're going to get (and that's whether you're familiar with the subject or not).

Now granted, I do accept that you can only follow what happened in true life, and I know that I'm on not on the sturdiest ground on which I've stood. But even so, the formula is this: with the optional inclusion of a modern-day wraparound, you get the talent of a musician being noticed, you see their gradual climb to fame, and then - what's this? - fame corrupts them somehow, they abuse a few substances, they destroy what's around them, and if they're lucky, they get some kind of redemption before they die.

I know, I know. This all makes me sound a little heartless. But the problem isn't the musician, it's the steadfast and predictable way in which Hollywood tends to approach these films (even the fictional music movies). It's not that the end product tends to be bad. It's just that it tends to be presented in a straight-down-the-line narrative that tries to cram as much into a film's running time as possible.

And that, friends, is the fundamental problem here. For it doesn't have to be like this. Take a look at the love letter that Tim Burton composed to Edward D Wood Jr in the film Ed Wood. That manages to get the start, middle and (nearly the) end of Wood's story in, but in a different, interesting and ultimately very, very effective way. Contrast that with Ray, an utterly conventional film made workable by a stunning central performance from Jamie Foxx. They couldn't be much further apart.

Music biopics don't always confirm to this template, though. I'm a fan of Kevin Spacey's Bobby Darin flick, Beyond The Sea. And that's not just because it's a solid film, but also because Spacey made some interesting choices in trying to get across Darin's story. Sure, it's a movie with flaws, but it's an interesting one nonetheless, and I can't think of a more interesting music biopic in recent times (although I'm sure someone would want to champion I'm Not There, and feel free to do so).

The Cobain biopic will be a major film for Universal, and I'll happily predict now that whoever takes on the central role will win an Oscar nomination, if not an Oscar. It's that kind of movie. But I'm genuinely intrigued to see if a musician who didn't really play by the rules can now inspire a movie that's willing to take a few narrative gambles too, rather than relying on a flat three-act structure. I doubt that it will, but I live in hope. And at the least, you could argue that its subject deserves it.

In the meantime, I sit here waiting to see if Martin Scorsese really will turn his attention to Frank Sinatra. Because that's one movie, in spite of all I've said above, I'd desperately want to see...

 

Tags

Users Comments

Re: The problem with music biopics
Posted By Interference 1 February 19, 2010 10:12:00 AM

Ed Wood is the best damn Burton film by far, and I will wrestle anyone to death who disagrees.

Re: The problem with music biopics
Posted By alephnaughtpix 1 February 19, 2010 10:38:46 AM

Definately would want to see what Scorsese would do with a Sinatra biopic. I'm surprised there's not been any mention of "La Vie En Rose", the film of Edith Piaf's life, as that managed to mix up the conventional biopic narrative in quite an interesting way, and still managed to get an Oscar for Marion Cotillard's performance. BTW We've already got a Kurt Cobain biopic, and an unconventional one at that, with Gus Vant Sant's "Last Days".

Re: The problem with music biopics
Posted By Name1ess 1 February 19, 2010 10:47:45 AM

Interference - I was going to argue with you about Ed Wood but I had a look at everything else Tim Burton's done and actually your absolutely right!

Re: The problem with music biopics
Posted By Sarah_Jayne 1 February 19, 2010 11:34:06 AM

I was in the final years of my American high school education when Cobain died. They simply weren't THAT big a group yet. Those who knew them loved them but it was for sure a cult thing. It could be argued that with his death it took Nirvana from a cult thing that the 'artsy' kids followed to being mainstream and therefore less powerful. Perhaps it could be argued that this is what a lot of biopics do too. They take something/somebody that a group of people really love and water it down to make it mainstream. This is where the recent Ian Dury film Sex & Drugs & Rock & Roll shined, in my view. You pretty much *had* to already know something about Ian Dury or the film would haven't made much sense. Better yet, they didn't try to make it make sense to non-fans either. Since they assumed that knowledge, they then were able to skip over the 'this is when he had his accident' moment that has been in most recent biopics (Ray and Walk The Line).

Re: The problem with music biopics
Posted By Sarah_Jayne 1 February 19, 2010 11:35:04 AM

Pee Wee's Big Adventure was a Tim Burton film!

Re: The problem with music biopics
Posted By Kahotep 1 February 19, 2010 11:48:45 AM

I don't think anyone really goes to a biopic for the story, because as you pointed out, it's rarely going to be unexpected or interesting. They go for the actor/actress in the role, usually someone better known for their comedy or romcom roles, but are now being given a chance to act in something different, and will invariably deliver a "stunning", "uncanny" or "electrifying" performance (gaining, as you also said, Oscar considerations. An actor who portrays a real person gets a better chance at the award. An even bigger chance if said person has a disability.) I turned off Beyond the Sea after ten minutes, despite my admiration for Spacey, because it seemed to be throwing all the hoary old biopic cliches ("You wanna know about the real Bobby? Well, lemme tell ya...") from the very start. And I predict that the Cobain bipic will be heavily-produced and possibly critically-acclaimed, but fail at the box office, because biopics fail even with the most renowned subjects, and no matter how revered the man is in some music circles, to most people Cobain remains just a minor footnote in history.

Re: The problem with music biopics
Posted By Nocturne 1 February 19, 2010 12:17:52 PM

Well seeing Courtney Love show up for the premiere should be amusing if nothing else is.

Re: The problem with music biopics
Posted By ERG1008 1 February 19, 2010 12:21:08 PM

I love Bob Dylan's music but thought I'm not there was pretentious drivel. Good call above on La Vie en Rose, brilliant film. Shame Heath Ledger isn't around, he'd be perfect to play Cobain. James Franco might be a good bet.

Re: The problem with music biopics
Posted By Sarah_Jayne 1 February 19, 2010 12:34:30 PM

What happened with the lawsuits over who owns the rights to the Nirvana music?

Re: The problem with music biopics
Posted By Geordie2004 1 February 19, 2010 04:46:20 PM

1) 'Heavier Than Heaven' wasn't an autobiography... 2) I loved 'I'm Not There', personally. I think the problem with it lies in the fact that you have to have more than a passing knowledge of Dylan's life story as well as his music to appreciate it.

Re: The problem with music biopics
Posted By _tjn_ 1 February 19, 2010 06:47:32 PM

'I was in the final years of my American high school education when Cobain died. They simply weren't THAT big a group yet.' eh? this was a band that knocked both Michael Jackson and Guns N'Roses off the number one spot in America (and at christmas, to boot) and at the same time, killed hair metal and arguably redefined MTV. yours is not a take I'd agree with and I'm not aware of any commentators who do either. even if you dont particularly like the band (and personally , I'm not a rabid fan - I wasnt that surprised when he did what he did and it didnt really bother me either - although it's a crying shame his daughter will grow up and never really know him - I wouldnt want that for anyone) you cannot deny that they caused a sea change in culture on so many levels.

Re: The problem with music biopics
Posted By dergolem 1 February 19, 2010 07:37:39 PM

Three little words: Sid & Nancy.

Re: The problem with music biopics
Posted By Norton77 1 February 19, 2010 08:57:49 PM

"Heavier Than Heaven" wasn't an autobiography. Joseph Gordon Levitt for Kurt Cobain Dave Grohl to play himself and who the hell is going to play Novoselic?!

Re: The problem with music biopics
Posted By vader100 1 February 20, 2010 03:56:35 AM

It is because Hollywood always wants to see the tragic, flawed genius. Do a film on Iron Maiden.... oh shit yeah they did better.

Re: The problem with music biopics
Posted By benheck 1 February 21, 2010 06:26:41 AM

Ed Wood IS Burton's best film, by a long shot. Well, I liked Big Fish a lot too, but I didn't buy the DVD and watch it 20 times. Also Burton's 1st Batman > Nolan's good but ultimately joyless films.

Re: The problem with music biopics
Posted By James-Clayton 1 February 21, 2010 07:02:37 PM

I think quite often studio execs just get lazy and greenlight musical biopics because they've got all the ingredients for instant audience and award potential. Sex, drugs & rock 'n' roll plus music plus triumph in face of adversity plot plus familiar material plus 'it's already been written': no wonder studios love 'em. I'm not enthused about having Cobain's name dragged through another bloody filter. I'd rather see original musicals or documentaries than dull biopics, to be honest...

Re: The problem with music biopics
Posted By shruggy63 1 February 21, 2010 07:20:13 PM

Charlie Hunnam (Jax in Sons of Anarchy) could be a good Kurt Cobain? Though he's a bit buff to play a junkie.

Re: The problem with music biopics
Posted By vasces 1 February 22, 2010 10:51:00 PM

I could see J.G. Levitt as either Cobain or Gruhl. How about Keanu Reeves as Novoselic just because it would be funny. ;) As for the poster who felt that Nirvana wasn't that big of a thing... if the impact is felt in Nebraska (where I grew up) than you can damn well bet it was an even bigger deal where there were actually people.
Post a Comment
Security Code* Get another image
 
 
Kurt Cobain (1967 - 1994)

Kurt Cobain (1967 - 1994)

Untitled Document

Follow Den of Geek on

Related Articles

SEARCH

Coke Zero
Advertisement