Den of Geek

James Bond will return – but not until 2011

Simon Brew


007’s next adventure isn’t set to go before the cameras until the end of next year…

Published on Oct 25, 2009

It's probably fair to say that most of us here weren't exactly bowled over with Quantum Of Solace, which was a bit of a shadow of the quite brilliant Casino Royale. So we've been intrigued to see just what Daniel Craig would get up to with his third James Bond adventure. After all, both Casino Royale and Quantum Of Solace were effectively two parts of the same story, so Bond 23 is the one where Daniel Craig is set to cut loose a little. Of course, given that he'll be in the third film of his Bond tenure, the fears arise that he'll fall into a similar mid-term rut that undercut the Pierce Brosnan Bond movies, but we're nonetheless still quite hopeful for the next movie.

And we're waiting for it, too. While there was only a two-year gap between Casino Royale and Quantum of Solace, there's going to be three between Quantum and the next movie. For Daniel Craig has revealed that the next Bond movie isn't even due to go before the cameras until the end of 2010.

The news was broken at the excellent CommanderBond.net website, as it uncovered a video of Craig talking about a performance of the play that he's currently starring in on Broadway. In response to a question shouted to him by a fan, Craig replied, "Uh, we start the end of next year..."

That would suggest that the Bond producers are looking for a November 2011 release date for the film, with an outside shot that it might by summer 2012. However, given that the Bond films traditionally sit closer to Christmas, winter 2011 is looking like the best bet right now.

Here's the story at CommanderBond.

 

Tags

Users Comments

Re: James Bond will return – but not until 2011
Posted By Nostromo71 1 October 26, 2009 10:36:35 AM

Am I the only person who actually ENJOYED Quantum of Solace and thinks that for all its many qualities Casino Royale was 20 minutes too LONG? Quantum of Solace was fast, brutal and surprisingly clever - a film that benefits from repeated viewings especially to appreciate the subtleties of Daniel Craig's performance. Admitedly it was the most sexless Bond since The Living Daylights but given its story was following directly on from the end of Casino Royale this DID make sense.Whatever - roll on the next one!

Re: James Bond will return – but not until 2011
Posted By Dierk 1 October 26, 2009 01:02:54 PM

Na, I still think, as I did when I got out of the theatre after the first viewing, QoS will be the most underrated James Bond movie since OHMSS. Granted, the script could have done with another go-through [cut short by the writer's strike], but then, the scripts after 1969 have all been crap except for Casino Royale. what I find a bit distressing is that nobody but me seems to see the development of Bond's character in QoS within the action sequences, which start out completely jumbled,confusing and dizzying like reflecting James' confusion. Over the course of the film they get ever more straightforward, less confused until, at the end, we have a self-assured James Bond acting instead of just reacting, knowing his place and how to make the best of it.

Re: James Bond will return – but not until 2011
Posted By cerveloguy 1 October 27, 2009 07:11:42 AM

It was the awful female lead that helped wreck QoS, actually there is little good to say about it. My advice is to make the next one totally un-PC. No Felix being cool and no French please.

Re: James Bond will return – but not until 2011
Posted By KWillyvox 1 October 27, 2009 06:21:21 PM

Although i enjoyed QoS, i'm a HUGE Bond fan, so i'm pretty easily entertained. Objectively, QoS wasn't even close to as fun and exciting as Casino. BUT, it was far superior to anything Brosnan.
Post a Comment
Security Code* Get another image
 
 
Untitled Document

Follow Den of Geek on

Related Articles

SEARCH

Coke Zero
Advertisement