Den of Geek

The James Clayton Column: District 9 and Alien Discrimination

James Clayton


Only after Alien Rights protesters experienced police brutality at their benefit concerts and educational sit-ins would the ones-not-of-this-planet rise up with anger against Earthlings...

Aliens will probably come in peace...until the riot police turn up...

Published on Aug 31, 2009

Now that District 9 has hovered into view, I’d say the time is right to finally face up to reality and drop all the delusions we’ve been carrying about human contact with aliens. Indeed, we shouldn’t be happy to see this movie simply because it offers some late-summer sci-fi spectacle, but also because it appears to offer some earnest insight rare in the movies. It’s taken long enough, but here we may at last have the film that gives a more realistic representation of how the encounter with extra-terrestrial life forms would really happen.

When it comes to belief in aliens, I’m inclined towards H.P. Lovecraft’s opinion that any visiting creatures from cosmic vistas beyond our stratosphere would be absolutely unlike anything within our ‘earthly’ understanding and experience. As such, instead of being little green men or slimy beasts that look a bit like Earth animals, they’d probably not even have any kind of anatomy as we know it. They would, in fact, more likely come to us as nebulous gases, disembodied space odours or luminescent thought-bubbles that communicate through telekinetic currents of electrical energy.

That school of thought poses a challenge for blockbuster movie production, so it’s understandable why District 9 would go down the usual route of having humanoid aliens that the audience can identify and recognise. What Neill Blomkamp's film does do though is affirm one of my other key beliefs about alien landings on Earth. As it does this, District 9 challenges convention and gives cinemagoers something stimulating and thought-provoking in contrast to the age-old clichés that have been carried on by sci-fi horrors for decades.

This is the truth: if aliens landed they would not begin wiping out human civilisation, hit its architectural monuments and occupy our planet as a new master. I reckon that, in fact, it would be the total opposite: the visitors would instead find themselves immediately incarcerated as a dangerous entity on the basis of their ‘inhumanity, before being scientifically studied and exploited for human-gain.

Conceptually, District 9 agrees, as it presents a world where extraterrestrials are kept segregated in an Apartheid-style arrangement, housed in a slum controlled by private military contractors.

Thanks to the backing of Peter Jackson and the full power of the Weta special effects people, Blomkamp has been able to adapt his short movie Alive in Joburg as a big blockbuster. Though now supersized, the feature-length flick still retains not only the mock-doc style, but most crucially the South African setting and the contextual basis in the institutionalised racism of Apartheid. What we have here is an alien-themed film more about discrimination than doomsday panic and perceived threat from the skies.

We’ve seen the King Kong flicks and Creature from the Black Lagoon and so we know that humanity takes extraordinary ‘monsters’ and makes them into a research project, pets for rich kids or a money-spinning sideshow. In contrast to the number of creature features that have recognised this sad truth though, aliens have all too often been approached as omnipotent invaders with few alternatives throughout film history.

It’s probably only the ugliness of the aliens in District 9 that prevents domestication and consequently they are categorised as undesirable elements to be kept under observation. So it goes then that the space-beings suffer in a system built on prejudice and pernicious contempt. Oh, the inhumanity! What happened to the dream of intergalactic harmony?

Alien designs on annihilating the human race would really only come after a prolonged period of persecution. In ‘reality’, the War of the Worlds fuse-lighting moment would most likely only flare after the extraterrestrials had exhausted diplomatic avenues and had a stab at political activism. Only after Alien Rights protesters experienced police brutality at their benefit concerts and educational sit-ins would the ones-not-of-this-planet rise up with anger against Earthlings.

In District 9, this clash between humans and “prawns” plays out in a more likely place than movie wisdom would traditionally have it: the streets of South Africa. Where do the powers-that-be dump their undesirables in the ‘real’ world? They bury them out-of-sight, out-of-mind in the third-world and so the location of the zone of the title in Africa - the crisis continent that the ‘civilised’ world wishes to ignore - is appropriate.

The setting in Blomkamp’s own home country also makes a change from the trips to America that invasion movies have made repeatedly. What makes the USA so special that space travellers would select it as the landing site? Why, when there’s an entire globe of divergent cultures to go at, would they pinpoint Washington D.C., New York City or the Arizona desert in particular?

You’d assume that the sentient beings would seek to communicate with intelligent representatives of the human race and, having seen Raising Arizona, we know that they won’t be found in the Copper State. Every invasion film that instantly springs to my mind - excepting The Thing - has the extraterrestrials arriving in the US of A, either seeking to hit the landmarks of Washington or infiltrate Earth through the country’s rural backwaters.

I put it to you that if there are aliens out there, if they had any interest in visiting Earth they’d send a polite request for landing clearance rather than ram their flying saucers into the White House. They’d be more interested in observing the Earth’s bio-systems and learning about the planet’s inhabitants than in destroying civilisation with death rays. What’s the point of travelling across the Milky Way if you’re only going to obliterate your final destination?

For not perpetuating the myth that the extraterrestrials are all out to get us and that, actually, the world is actually aggressively against them, I salute District 9. (People’s eagerness to deny the existence of life ‘out-there’ is testament to this vicious hatred.) This film may be serving the greater intergalactic good better than any movie since E.T. the Extra Terrestrial.

Empathise with the space-travellers. They only want to have a conversation with us, teach us how to care for our plants and pass on their wisdom of worlds beyond the stars. All the human race wants is rid of the cosmic ‘other’ before they’ve even got over their intergalactic jet-lag. Until hostile discrimination against non-humans is eliminated, issue movies like District 9 are essential.

James' previous column can be found here.

 

Tags

Users Comments

Re: The James Clayton Column: District 9 and Alien Discrimination
Posted By Dierk 1 September 4, 2009 10:53:21 AM

Look at it from the PoV of, well, earthly habitats: they are invaded by big, hulking almost hairless beasts on two legs, trampling everything into the ground. Then, when the beasts get interested in the habitat they've already nearly destroyed, they catch the native plants and animals - either to concoct strange to unspeakable experiments on them or to breed domesticable beasts of burden and pets. Now readjust your TV set, ähem, your perspective back to being the beast that does all this. And apply it to anything this two-legged, featherless, almost hairless creature sees as more intelligent and technologically advanced than itself. Clearly anal-probing and havoc-wielding aliens are simply a projection of the mediocre animals living in huge offices in Hollywood. They fear anything that is more intelligent or otherwise different from them; fear leads to senseless violence.

Re: The James Clayton Column: District 9 and Alien Discrimination
Posted By gr81disp 1 September 4, 2009 12:05:14 PM

This was one of the most preposterous columns I've read on this site. First you say that they will probably be forms of life unlike any we have encountered and then ascribe to them human emotions thoughts and feelings, turning them into alien hippies. You then proceed to talk about how humanity will instanty repress the advanced alien society that has technology beyond our wildest dreams and only after diplomacy has been exhausted will they have to rise up against the stupid brutes known as humanity who still managed to be smart enough to repress them. Good premise for a movie, but truthfully, Independence Day, with aliens that need room to expand and considers humanity a trifling problem, is MUCH more realistic than alien hippies repressed by THE MAN. That is how bad this column is. I USED INDEPENDANCE DAY AS A SOURCE OF REALISM!!!

Re: The James Clayton Column: District 9 and Alien Discrimination
Posted By Ibashdaily 1 September 4, 2009 04:37:52 PM

I think you missed the point...but then again you are the gr81...

Re: The James Clayton Column: District 9 and Alien Discrimination
Posted By gudge 1 September 5, 2009 07:24:26 AM

Dude, many readers will know I have my share of problems with articles on this site, but your comment is pretty damned ignorant in itself. You seem to think that aliens looking completely different to humans would be 'preposterous', while i see this as science fact. Just as a starting point any foreign species would have to take its planets mass into account - anything different to our own would constitute a different build of muscles to deal with it, let alone distances from its star(s), number of moons (earth has one moon, the District 9 aliens' planet has 7). Now, as far as the 'hippies' being repressed by 'THE MAN' (i like caps too, and INDEPENDANCE DAY) is entirely plausible. At the beginning of the film we find out that the aliens are basically refugees - who knows what situation they come from. They are obviously an intelligent species that have hit hard times. They didnt come here to live in slums, so therefore its not a choice. Again, the film tells us that when the aliens arrive they are malnourished, while the aliens tell us that they have lost their fuel. Now finally, how is it not likely that humans wouldnt repress them? Humans force their own kind into slums and refugee camps, so if 1.8 million aliens were to turn up in one city, they wouldnt be putting them up in the Hotel Fucking Hilton. Try watching the film before you decide that Independence Day is a more accurate description of events (also a pathetic statement. obviously aliens would turn up just to blow up the whitehouse, and obviously Will Smith and a pissed up Randy Quaid would save the day). Finally, I would like to point out that your post in itself actually reinforces what James is saying: that most people are scared and ignorant, and if aliens did turn up would only see them as hostile and something to fear - the human reaction that would instigate the actions seen in District 9.

Re: The James Clayton Column: District 9 and Alien Discrimination
Posted By gr81disp 1 September 5, 2009 11:56:14 PM

My point wasn't about physical appearance. Anything we come up with to represent an alien is almost certainly going to be way off. But mentally they also would have evolved differently and have completely different motivations and thought process which is where ascribing anthropomorphic tendencies breaks down. I am not saying Independence Day was realistic, just more so than D9. Hell, if aliens wanted to take over earth, we are toast. As for D9, saying the aliens are refugees is just a cop out. Refugees took over a highly advanced spacecraft, flew to earth and managed not to crash and kill themselves along the way? Highly implausible. As for how they would be treated by earthlings, I believe in the goodness of humanity. Yeah, picking South Africa was a good idea considering their history of Apartheid, I can see that possibly happening there. But I think IF some alien refugees did land on Earth, it would look more like the old movie/television show Alien Nation than D9. Assuming we didn't piss them of and they just annihilate us.

Re: The James Clayton Column: District 9 and Alien Discrimination
Posted By Dierk 1 September 7, 2009 06:28:16 AM

sure, one can read D9 as a straight [and then: boring] SF-thriller. Or one could use ones braincells and see that the writer/director chose South Africa for two reasons: 1. He is from SA; 2. The film is about Apartheid. From 2. develops the underlying theme of human interaction - very often based upon [unreasonable] fear from which violence stems. Trying to parse details about alien civilisations from a film is a bit disingenuous, as it can only show us the specifics needed to tell a story from a creative human mind. This, BTW, is what keeps many [most?] people off of SF, the details-obsessed fanbase more interested in the most arcane pipe curvature in a split-second moment in a corridor than what's actually going on.
Post a Comment
 
District 9

District 9

Follow Den of Geek on

Related Articles

SEARCH

Broadband

Mobile Broadband

Compare over 100 mobile broadband & broadband deals online!

Mobile Phones

LG ArenaHTC Magic

Compare over 250 mobile phones &
52,000 deals!

Click Here