Den of Geek

Confused Views: Strictly for chump-core

Matt Edwards


It seems as though there's a big scrap on this year for who can spend the most money on turning out the crappiest film

Matt looks back on the carcasses of Wolverine, Transformers 2 and Terminator Salvation. What's becoming of modern-day audiences, he wonders...?

Published on Jul 2, 2009

On a recent trip to Portsmouth I found myself aboard the HMS Victory with a group of people I don't know very well. They're friends of my girlfriend, so I have to be nice to them and they have to be nice to me. The peace between us seems very tenuous, but it exists, balanced like a sober Mickey Rourke - safe for now, but always threatening to disappear into the abyss.

Aboard the Victory, the debate raged amongst them about Nelson's last words, at the very point where he died. "Kiss me, Hardy", "Kismet, Hardy" or ‘other' appeared to be the main points that were being made. Now, I can't claim to have any insight into this subject. I had nothing to offer the conversation, which became quite intense. Given that I don't know them very well and I don't think they like me anyway, it seemed foolish to interject with nothing at all. That said, I was becoming very bored. We'd been stood on the spot for some time whilst they each reiterated their point. It's not like they were going to come to any conclusion. None of them were there anyway, so the idea that any of them had a definitive and correct answer seemed arrogant.

Then, the point was raised, "What you're saying is nonsense and gibberish, sir. Who would say ‘Kiss me, Hardy'?"

"Stan Laurel?" I questioned.

I knew that none of them had a sense of humour and that they were having a debate that was of some importance to them, so why would I make a stupid joke to trivialise it? All I achieved was ostracising myself from the group and a brief smirk of amusement from myself. The whole rest of the day was a write-off. I don't know what my problem is.

I think it's the same problem, my inability to avoid jabbing the big red self-destruct button, which was responsible for my presence in the Leicester Square Odeon on Saturday afternoon watching Transformers: Revenge Of The Fallen. I didn't really like the first one and the second looked awful, too. In fact, nearly all of the big summer movies look terrible this year, so it only makes sense that I've managed to see all four of them so far. Fortunately for the Trek-core elite, Star Trek was alright. Everything else has been, well...

It seems as though there's a big scrap on this year for who can spend the most money on turning out the crappiest film. Transformers this weekend was so awful I wanted to chainsaw pieces of my own face off and use the chunks of flesh to construct a blindfold to shield me from the bad. Unfortunately, I'm not comfortable making that much noise in a cinema and so the chainsaw idea had to be abandoned. I did make a brief effort with a discarded popcorn box but just ended up rubbing salty cardboard onto 40 paper cuts. It hurt, but not enough.

There are so many things to hate about Transformers. The robots themselves look like Meccano mis-shapes as constructed by a handless drunk. Two of the Autobots talk like gangster rappers and during a critical moment of the film Optimus Prime issues the rousing battle cry "Let's roll!" It's a series of very stupid events that you can't even see properly because, apparently, if the cameraman stays still for too long, it violates union regulations and the whole crew gets to strike. Which, to be honest, might have improved the film.

Perhaps the most annoying thing about Transformers: ROTF is its fans. They're hardcore chumps. They refer to it as T2, like Terminator 2 never happened, and they can only praise the film in obnoxious Americanisms they've heard on Friends like ‘totally awesome' and ‘hello? Best movie ever!'. I'm sure I even heard someone say ‘that scene where the little dog humps the big dog made me do a serious LOL'.

In Leicester Square they applauded after the film. I'm not sure if this audience were such chumps that they actually meant this or if they were only chump enough that they didn't know what clapping meant. Perhaps everyone had a simultaneous hand spasm. But from where I was sitting it felt like they were condoning the film, which would confirm that Transformers: ROTF is strictly for chump-core audiences.

Terminator Salvation wasn't much better. We get a 45 minute montage of explosions and shootouts, some kind of plot that involves Christian Bale shouting very loudly at a pregnant woman and a radio, some naked Austrian grappling and lots more explosions. I do think it's funny that the Terminators are starting to look more like Transformers, where Transformers seems to be developing Terminator-like Transformers.  This never would have happened on Cameron's watch.

However, in terms of the shittiest film of the summer so far, it's Wolverine that is leading the pack (I know, that is awful, but good films get good word play and Wolverine gets ‘leader of the pack'). The film stumbled onto screens after a troubled production and bizarrely-handled Internet leak looking like a once beloved boxing champion in the pitiful twilight of their career: sluggish, confused and in terrible shape. It also had weird-looking ears. Every single character who isn't Wolverine seems only to be present to advertise a spin-off film. Perhaps the worst part, though, is the last twenty minutes, which seem to feature special effects from Crayola as rendered by a handless drunk.

So where does this leave me for the rest of the summer? Standing in queues in sweltering heat, waiting to buy an overpriced ticket for a film that I know is going to be awful. Why do it to myself? It seems that the captain of the HMS Confused Views is the biggest chump of them all. Drop anchor. Abandon ship. Kiss me, Hardy.

 

Tags

Users Comments

Re: Confused Views: Strictly for chump-core
Posted By spago 1 July 2, 2009 11:07:07 AM

i couldnt agree more, this summer has been nothing but a bitter dissapointment and a waste of three franchises. michael bay has always been an arsehole so i can forgive that, and whoever decided McG was good enough to make a terminator film, or FUCKING GAVIN HOOD to make Wolverine, frankly, needs to die in a fire. Star Trek was the summer's saving grace, but one out of four is a terrible average for summer blockbusters

Re: Confused Views: Strictly for chump-core
Posted By chamelious 1 July 2, 2009 11:48:19 AM

I agree with you in that you shouldn't have bothered going to see a film when you know you wouldn't like it. Who the hell are you to call the people who do like it "chumps"? I mean fair enough if you hate it, even fair enough if you want to waste your time seeing it then reviewing it. But then ridiculing people who did enjoy it? Get off your high horse you elitist prick.

Re: Confused Views: Strictly for chump-core
Posted By Overfiend 1 July 2, 2009 01:58:04 PM

Nah, they really are chumps. Them using "LOL" is all the proof you need.

Re: Confused Views: Strictly for chump-core
Posted By evanjdooner 1 July 2, 2009 02:30:41 PM

I agree with chamelious; you wouldn't deride a chimp for getting enjoyment from banging a stick off a rock, would you?

Re: Confused Views: Strictly for chump-core
Posted By cordas 1 July 2, 2009 06:51:40 PM

I dunno I think there is a lot more to blame than just the directors... after all someone had to hire them in the 1st case.... My feeling is that the studios are far too risk averse, and don't credit the audience with enough intelligence. They hire hack writers to write hack scripts who are told that the stunt / fx sequences are the be all and end all of the movie... Give me an intelligent script with no plot holes, some decent action and stunt sequences and you will end up with a decent blockbuster.

Re: Confused Views: Strictly for chump-core
Posted By justacomment 1 July 3, 2009 04:33:06 PM

According to QI (Series B, Episode 8), Nelson's last words were "Drink, drink, fan, fan, rub, rub". http://www.answers.com/topic/list-of-qi-episodes-b-series

Re: Confused Views: Strictly for chump-core
Posted By Kapp 1 July 6, 2009 09:25:46 PM

I truly have hope most of the time for sceince fiction cinema. But sometimes, I think that, as an art form, as something that is NOT dumbed down, sci fi cinema is in danger. I have not yet got a chance to see "Moon" in the theaters, and I want to do so, because 1. it looks cool 2. looks like a good story 3. ISNT TRANSFORMERS and WASNT DIRECTED BY MICHAEL BAY...I just gotta get my wife to get her mother to babysit and get over there to see that film- My point is, sci fi cinema, and just film in general, is in DANGER, if people are called "elitist" for wanting films to have an intelligent storyline, good camera shots, good exciting action scenes, and humor that IS ACTUALLY FUNNY. My example- I rented the film "Inkheart" for my daughter to watch...I had to keep reminding her that I rented her a film because she was so busy wathcing cartoons all weekend...we end up watching it with my wife's family...all that work to see this film- and it was NOT WELL MADE. Plot went nowhere, characters had no clear trajectory, etc. And THAT film earned a 39% rating on Rotten Tomatoes...Transformers is currently at 20%...Critics completely and unabashedly HATE this film with a passion- and people go in droves to see it and then say "Dude, that was awesome"... I'm not going to be one of them...I dont need to waste my time or money on something just to be herd-like. But I do have concerns for the future of cinema when a film that I am fairly certain is THAT LAME is such a huge success. It's already reported that Bay has already been greenlighted to do Transformers 3.............(yikes)
Post a Comment
Security Code* Get another image
 
 
Death of Admiral Nelson

What's this got to do with Wolverine? Funny you asked...

Untitled Document

Follow Den of Geek on

Related Articles

SEARCH

Coke Zero
Advertisement