Den of Geek

The James Clayton Column: The cult of the crazy old lady

James Clayton


James celebrates Sam Raimi's Drag Me To Hell, with a couple of spoilers within...!

Published on Jun 5, 2009

As far as movie villains go, I think that Mrs. Sylvia Ganush of Drag Me To Hell has instantly catapulted herself into the elite club of "Unbelievably Noxious and Nefarious Nasty Guys in Film That You Can't Help But Love Nonetheless". Though I sympathise with the Alison Lohman character - sweet-faced Christine Brown who's sadly condemned and cursed for the one occasion she fails to show compassion - I can't help but cheer on the wicked gypsy hag who harangues her in Sam Raimi's new horror flick.

Played brilliantly by Lorna Raver, Ganush is great. Throughout Drag Me To Hell, she's memorable and mesmerising as the infirm and elderly bringer of darkness who swiftly turns from vulnerable pensioner to vicious purveyor of curses upon being refused an extension on her mortgage repayments. It's unwise, so it emerges in the unfortunate case of Christine, to come down hard on a gypsy woman...

Regardless of Ganush's wisdom in the ways of the supernatural, Christine should have known that, aside from being rude, it's really not a good idea to go up against antiquated female figures anyway. I'm pretty certain that there is no more unsettling an antagonist in cinema than the archetypal crazy old lady. If Psycho taught us anything (beyond the fact that you shouldn't steal money, that there's a reason the empty roadside motel has nothing but vacancies and that taxidermists are odd), it's that you don't mess around with mad elderly mothers. Such is their power to do pernicious damage, their ill-influence can transcend the grave (as seen in both Psycho and Drag Me To Hell). Never cross a deranged matriarch (I think it's something to do with giving birth. Once you've been through that, everything else is easy).

Ganush is furthermore a fantastic adversary in that she's not only suitably disturbed but concomitantly disturbing and, indeed, disgusting. Manners maketh man, but they mean nothing and matter not when you're a frighteningly insane old hag in a film. No standing on ceremony for Sylvia - she just slips out those false teeth in front of all and sundry at the building society and leaves the slobber-covered dentures on the desk so she can suck on sweets. Admit it - if you had false teeth you wouldn't resist the opportunity to gross everyone out. For her unashamed self-acceptance and refreshing honesty (though there isn't much ‘fresh' about it), I salute the gummy grand old woman.

It's not just the false-dentures that bring forth an abundance of bodily fluids, and right from the beginning Sylvia is established as an almighty purveyor of putrescence through her constant hacking and wheezing. From her first encounter with the clean young Christine she's coughing up phlegm and she subsequently proceeds - should that fail to rile the spectator's sanitary concerns - to spread more yuckiness throughout Drag Me To Hell. As Ganush goes for her victim with vehement hell fury, poor Christine comes into contact with more saliva, slobber, gunk, gore and other gushy substances than any regular person would want to experience in a lifetime.

Perhaps that means I'm not a regular person as I loved the all-out viscera and slimy violence of Drag Me To Hell. It's been acclaimed as Sam Raimi's return to form and celebratory slide back into the Evil Dead-type stuff that made his name, but I'd mark the movie as a happy comeback for cathartic splatter cinema. In a sea of bleak brutality, Drag Me To Hell's inclinations towards black comedy and interest in amping up the ooze instead of focusing on perverse sadism, as many horror releases have done lately, strikes me as something to savour. Whether we're freakishly weird or not, fans of schlock and gunge are guaranteed a mind-blowingly great time as Ganush unleashes all icky insects and barrel-loads of bodily fluid on the mortified Christine.

In the face of such carnage, the more practical, hygienic or house proud members of the audience may find themselves asking: "how on Earth would you clean up such mess?" To deal with her own personal flying phlegm, Ganush uses a grotty old handkerchief, which raises another reason to praise her (and, indeed, the entire film). Several seemingly mundane, innocuous items from everyday life become charged with supernatural evil in Drag Me to Hell and the eyeball-sprouting slice of cake and curse-bearing button stand as two examples of material objects that come to assume a more sinister nature. (Incidentally, if you look to the way button-eyes came to symbolise the subversive threat of the ‘Other' world in Coraline, I'd say someone is trying to tell us something. Don't trust the buttons!)

Beating out such humble horrors as a cyclopean dessert and a diabolical coat-fastener, Ganush's hankie sits as the supreme object of evil in the movie. Possessed and empowered to forcefully attack Christine in her car, the handkerchief captured my imagination whether it was floating ominously in anticipation of its assault or in the actual act of engaging its prey.

If you think about it, handkerchiefs are pretty nasty things considering that they exist to be shoved in nasal orifices and soak up stuff that no one wants to contemplate. It makes sense then that one should be constructed in film as an artefact of ill omen to accurately reflect the dread and disgust that people project onto them. In view of the fact that Mrs. Ganush's well-worn hankie has presumably had to endure years of the most repulsive phlegm, slobber and snot conceivable, it's no wonder it turned evil. The inspired act of manipulating a nose wipe into being a manifestation of gypsy black magic is a masterstroke. Thanks to Drag Me To Hell, noses will be running unstaunched all winter...

Until Attack Of The Toilet Paper is released then, there's probably going to be no more upsetting a prospect to flu-suffering cinemagoers than the possessed handkerchief belonging to the Great Ganush. With said demonic hankie alongside her wonky eye, hexing fury and delightful amounts of discharge, I find Raver's character to be compelling and captivating as a cult villain. She's the kind of crazed old lady that you long to see crop up in a film for no apparent good reason - every film needs the reassuring presence of a decrepit ancient hack in the backdrop to occasionally cackle with malice or make a remark about "something narsty in the woodshed". Forget Spider-Man 4, Sam - what we need is a franchise for gypsy geriatric Sylvia Ganush.


James' previous column can be found here.

 

Tags

Users Comments

This Movie Was Terrible
Posted By DanDFromNJ 1 June 5, 2009 02:03:01 PM

Since I loved the Evil Dead Movies and regularly read this site and a number of others that were praising this poop fest, I decided to waste 20 dollars and two hours of both my and my girlfriend's lives the other day. The buildup is great, as is the parking lot scene (although it moves a little too far from scary to silly for me, and I wonder why she is in a giant underground parking lot when she seems to work in a strip mall). However, once that is over, Ihave a number of problems with the film. 1. The Lamia of legend is a female vampire, not some sort of baphomet-inspired shadow. 2. While I'm on the shadow: They never show the thing and the ending is anti-climactic because of it. 3. The ending is also damn obvious to anyone who has ever taking a writing class (I realized the envelope was going to be relevant as soon as the coin was put in it in the beginning, tey made too big a deal out of it) or was paying attention (Both me and my girlfriend immidiately knew the coin envelope replaced the button envelope as soon as she took it after the accident. It was painfully obvious.) 4. If the button was so damn important, wouldn't she at least take a peak in the envelop before she ran around like a maniac getting to the grave? I know I would. 5. I know it's relevant to today's times and I can't even argure it wasn't a good plot device. But it was the THIRD time the gypsy was in forclosure (or default or whatever). So, it the commentary on this movie that banks are evil because at some point they expect people to pay their mortgage payments and that its wring to take take things back after giving people multiple chances to pay? THIS MOVIE IS POOP ON A PLATE! Bona Petit!

Re: The James Clayton Column: The cult of the crazy old lady
Posted By Soupie 1 June 5, 2009 09:18:46 PM

I think anyone would have got the ending spoiler from the envelope thing tbh. Though I thought as HE was now the owner of it as it was left in HIS car, I might have been proved wrong... ahh well. Overall as juvenile as the plot appears, I liked the atmosphere of it.. and hell man, banks are EVIL :o))

Re: The James Clayton Column: The cult of the crazy old lady
Posted By Soupie 1 June 5, 2009 09:19:59 PM

I also thought that Justin would be a very good choice should there every be a 'The Life Of Keanu Reeves' movie

Re: The James Clayton Column: The cult of the crazy old lady
Posted By HolgerHaase 1 June 7, 2009 09:58:01 AM

Must admit I tend to agree with the commenters in that this is definitely somewhat of a flawed movie. I absolutely loved the first half of it to bits: It was wonderfully gross out and yucky, but for the second half it slid into (involuntary? I can't tell) humour that really was at odds with the excellent premise. This could have been one of the best horror movies ever, but just ended up deeply flawed.

Re: The James Clayton Column: The cult of the crazy old lady
Posted By Soupie 1 June 7, 2009 09:33:00 PM

I laughed propers at the gumming of the face bit , when she lost her horrid false teeth and decided that sucking and gumming would work... well I suppose the victim still screamed... movie makers love a good screamer
Post a Comment
Security Code* Get another image
 
 
Drag Me To Hell

Drag Me To Hell

Untitled Document

Follow Den of Geek on

Related Articles

SEARCH

Coke Zero
Advertisement