Den of Geek

Weekend US Box Office report: Star Trek's 'disappointing' $72 million?

Ron Hogan


If a (frankly) shitty movie can bring in $13 million dollars more than a movie with GREAT buzz, what hope is there for the franchise?

Star Trek rules the US box office, with X-Men Origins: Wolverine in steep decline...

Published on May 11, 2009

Is it possible for a film to debut with one of the biggest openings in the franchise's box office history, yet still be kind of disappointing? That's the question I'm asking myself about Star Trek. The J.J. Abrams-helmed reboot of Paramount's tentpole franchise brought in over $72.5 million dollars at the US box office this weekend, enough to blow the total openings of every other Trek film out of the water. It's an unqualified success, yet... it's not terribly impressive anymore.

Fast And Furious, which is basically a franchise reboot after the disaster that was Tokyo Drift, brought in $70 million and cost half as much to make and market as Star Trek did. Hell, X-Men Origins: Wolverine (second place, $27 million, $129.6 million so far) brought in $85 million last weekend after everyone had already saw it online and trashed it for being absolutely horrible. If a (frankly) shitty movie can bring in $13 million dollars more than a movie with GREAT buzz, what hope is there for the franchise? I'm sure this will go on to be a very successful film for Paramount, but I heard some predictions of $100 million dollars this weekend! Trek will be lucky to bring in Wolverine money in its second weekend.

Ghosts Of Girlfriends Past dropped to third this weekend, on 10.45 million dollars. The slip was a lot less than I had assumed it would be. Perhaps this was the weekend where all the Wolverine audience had to make it up to their girlfriends for that movie with a little shirtless Matthew McConaughey action. Well, I assume he's shirtless; normally he doffs his top in every movie, kind of like Kate Winslet.

Obsessed falls to fourth place on $6.6 million at the box office. While the film cracked $56 million this weekend, proving that these sorts of films are very lucrative, it doesn't seem to have captured the cultural zeitgeist like, say, Fatal Attraction did before it. Good box office results, though!

Fifth place this weekend was 17 Again. The teen-themed comedy brought in another 4.4 million dollars. When you combine that film's $54 million with the $74 million drummed up by Hannah Montana The Movie (tenth place, $2.4 million), it's easy to see why the Disney company makes so much money and why they work so hard to promote new teen stars (prepare yourselves for Demi Lovato and Selena Gomez, they're next on the list). Disney's big (corporate) sister Buena Vista's documentary, Earth, spent the weekend in ninth place on $2.488 million. Needed more teen pop tie-ins, I guess.

Next Day Air was aimed at more of an urban audience. The comedy/action caper, starring every black actor in Hollywood who wasn't already in a movie during filming, stumbled on debut with only $4 million. The film took sixth place, but lacked the opening clout of a Tyler Perry movie. It's the sort of film that Jaime Foxx used to make until he decided to be a serious actor. The Soloist, Foxx's latest acting effort, sank to seventh place this weekend on $3.6 million.

Monsters Vs. Aliens lands in eighth place this weekend from fifth last weekend. The animated comedy is finally starting to lose steam, with box office receipts dipping to $3.37 million dollars. The gross is edging ever closer to $200 million, with running US totals hanging in at just under $187 million. I think it will still make it, fingers crossed.

Next weekend, the only film making wide release is the latest team-up from the uber-lucrative pairing of Ron Howard and Tom Hanks, Angels & Demons. The sequel to The Da Vinci Code will be lucky to match the preceding film's staggering $758 million worldwide gross. I expect it to do about half that business overall.

 

Users Comments

Re: Weekend US Box Office report: Star Trek's 'disappointing' $72 million?
Posted By DamonD 1 May 11, 2009 10:23:26 AM

In terms of the franchise it blows everything else away. In terms of the mega blockbusters it doesn't, but then having sometimes between those two examples was probably the most likely outcome. I thought it would make about $80m. It will need to do well internationally to make a profit. But it should do that, and the thing in its favour is that the WOM is very good, so it could hold up better than most of the one-and-done blockbusters of recent years.

Re: Weekend US Box Office report: Star Trek's 'disappointing' $72 million?
Posted By stcoop 1 May 11, 2009 02:35:53 PM

What a pile of crap. The Studio's expectations were that Trek would make around $50-60m for the weekend, which it far exceeded. Woverine was coming off a higly successful franchise (And as much as Internet nerds like to trash it X-Men III was a massive success.) Star Trek as a franchise was not only dead and buried but had a massive "nerds only" stigma attached to it. So to consider the film anything other than a success is just nonsense.

Re: Weekend US Box Office report: Star Trek's 'disappointing' $72 million?
Posted By RobGordon23 1 May 11, 2009 04:27:27 PM

I'm not really sure how 70+ million can be disappointing under any circumstance. And Wolverine was going to make more money than Trek regardless of how many people watched it online. Wolverine was running off of an entire trilogy of success to help boost it, while Trek was running off of Nemesis from 7 years ago. I think Star Trek will have a better hold over then most people think and it will give the franchise the shot in the arm it needs. To think 70 million is 'disappointing' is ridiculous...what idiot thought 100 was even an option?

Re: Weekend US Box Office report: Star Trek's 'disappointing' $72 million?
Posted By theshadowalker 1 May 11, 2009 07:09:32 PM

My $.02? Batman Begins, another franchise reboot, had a very tentative opening weekend 'cause Joe Public was still leery of the Batman franchise...so I fully expected Star Trek to have the same, initial problem that Begins had. But, unlike X3 or Wolverine which both opened huge - because people still like (or, at least, WANT to like) the X franchise - only to crash and burn the following week, I think this Trek will have legs (like, again, Begins).

Re: Weekend US Box Office report: Star Trek's 'disappointing' $72 million?
Posted By blackgeek1 1 June 2, 2009 07:51:10 PM

Here’s a perfect example of someone writing about an aspect of a business in which he knows next to nothing about. Don’t you just love the Internet? I would like to know from what legitimate sources did the writer overhear that Star Trek would make close to $100M on its opening weekend? And furthermore, how in the world could $72M been conceived as a poor showing for a franchise which was pretty much dead as others have pointed out. It is now a few weeks since Star Trek came out and it is still holding up quite well at the box-office here in the America, while the other films you pointed out, like Wolverine have faded quickly. This was a huge misinterpretation of the film industry and a solid return for a franchise that had been left for dead for years, and featured no huge movie stars.
Post a Comment
Security Code* Get another image
 
 
Zachary Quinto as Spock in Abrams' Star Trek

Zachary Quinto as Spock in Abrams' Star Trek

Untitled Document

Follow Den of Geek on

Related Articles

SEARCH

Coke Zero
Advertisement