Den of Geek

Indiana Jones IV: No Sean Connery

Simon Brew


Presumably the character of Henry Jones Sr is in the script somewhere. Especially as it took them so long to write the damn thing

Indiana Jones IV is shortly to start filming! And, it's now been confirmed, Sean Connery isn't going to be in it! Is George Lucas about to squander another legacy?

Published on Jun 8, 2007

In a not-unexpected turn, given that he retired from acting in 2005 (leaving us with the, er, The League Of Extraordinary Gentlemen as his final film), Sean Connery has now confirmed that he won't be joining the cast of Indiana Jones IV.

This is not good news.

Indiana Jones And The Last Crusade was perhaps the flabbiest of the films to date, but it was also damn funny, and the majority of the fun stemmed from the relationship between Sean Connery and Harrison Ford as father and son. As Connery wisely noted in that film, "Our situation has not improved".

Now, notwithstanding the fact that Ford is now in his 60s and this is going to present some different challenges of its own, it does ask questions as to where Spielberg and Lucas can take the franchise next. They made little secret of the fact that they were looking to snare Connery back, and presumably - as the movie is shortly to start filming - the character of Henry Jones Sr is in the script somewhere. Especially as it took them so long to write the damn thing.

So will they recast? Surely they couldn't do that? This isn't like a Batman movie, where every role seems to get refreshed every few films (Aaron Eckhardt is to be the third person to play Harvey Dent, by our reckoning, in just six films). And who would they get? Is Michael Gambon's agent expecting a call or something?

So they leave him out? It has to be the most logical move. And surely that leaves the film with a bit of a hole at the heart of it, given the strength of the family relationship that powered The Last Crusade.

Disappointing as the news about Connery is, and despite our deep-seated feelings that the film is being made around half a decade too late, there are some things about the production that have perked us up.

Certainly the addition of John Hurt to the cast is a good thing, and we'd turn up to see Ray Winstone in pretty much anything (excluding King Arthur, obviously). Cate Blanchett too is intelligent casting. And we hope the return of Karen Allen from Raiders turns out to be true.

As for the rest of it? Well, with the cameras rolling imminently for a release on 21/22 May 2008, we suspect we'll be finding out more in due course. Fingers crossed: we really want this to be good, and hope desperately that our gut reservations are proved false.

And our guess for the title? Indiana Jones And The Asbo Of Doom. Er, don't worry. Our taxi's here...

 

 

Tags

Users Comments

Re: Indiana Jones IV: No Sean Connery
Posted By RonHogan 1 June 8, 2007 01:31:41 PM

Disappointing the 007 isn't in the film, but I'll go see it anyway if only to have my childhood raped again by George Lucas.

Raiders Of The Lost Steradent Tin
Posted By twosheds 1 June 9, 2007 01:33:04 PM

I think Connery is wise in this - they blew it by waiting too long (if you can't get a half-decent popcorn script together in 16 years, you probably can't do it at all). Ford may now need a stunt-double even if he is required to rise quickly from a chair.
Post a Comment
Security Code* Get another image
 
 
Harrison Ford and Sean Connery "Retirement is just too damned much fun", says Sean Connery. Bah.
Untitled Document

Follow Den of Geek on

Related Articles

SEARCH

Coke Zero
Advertisement