Den of Geek

Do all superheroes merit movie adaptations?

Craig Lines


The Dragon manages to do all of this gung-ho fannying about without once giving in to weaknesses like, say, a personality.

Superhero movies seem to be making big bucks nowadays. But where should we draw the line? Not all superheroes were created equal, after all...

Published on May 2, 2007

Edgar Wright's decision to direct an Ant-Man feature film in 2008 suggests that ANY comic book character is fair game for an adaptation nowadays. A badly dressed, insecure paranoiac with a Napoleon Complex, Ant-Man was constantly overshadowed by his fellow Avengers and his solo comic was the least commercially successful of any launched by Marvel throughout the Silver Age; and yet … he gets his own movie?

In the 21st Century, the Marvel Universe is a full-on multimedia world and clearly everything must be assimilated. Whilst most early attempts to televise or film even the finest of comics resulted in Lycra-tastic camping or squeaky-voiced cartoon stereotypes, the superhero movie has critically and commercially come of age in the last decade. The bandwagon is rolling with nitro boosters.

So what about a Forbush Man movie, based on the antics of the anti-hero from Marvel's legendary Not Brand Echh series? This saucepan-headed loser was blessed with No-Power. No one has ever been quite certain what No-Power does, but it's very likely it does nothing. Perhaps the charisma-barren Paul Giamatti could be brought in to play the part?

Or how about Mole Man? Possibly the lamest supervillain within the Marvel Universe, his criminal devastation amounts to little beyond some spiteful property damage in the 1960s and multiple failed attempts to burrow into the Earth with his drills. He was last seen being kidnapped by the Lava Men somewhere in the inner caves; a whimper of an ending for a dull, pointless character. Hmm. With those credentials, this could be another Giamatti opportunity!

It’s not Marvel, but I will cry black, treacly tears of despair on the day when they make a movie of my least favourite comic character of all time; THE SAVAGE DRAGON. A lean-finned, green-skinned behemoth of a creature who joins the police force and fights evil everywhere; from keeping Chicago’s streets clean, to saving the President from supervillain Mr Glum and his weapon, the ‘God Gun’ (manufactured in Iraq, no less). I’m, sadly, not making this up. Quite an achievement that the Dragon manages to do all of this gung-ho fannying about without once giving in to weaknesses like, say, a personality. Hey, wait a minute. Someone get Paul Giamatti on the phone!

Ah. But enough cynicism. Try as I might to be scathing, I still keep buying into all this junk. Who am I to complain if there are hundreds more comic book adaptations coming out? Some of them are even getting pretty good; I have to admit that I adored the recent Ghost Rider adaptation every bit as much as the comics. Maybe one day we’ll see some more of my favourite characters get their own movies:

  • Deathlok, the rogue cyborg killing machine could make for one Hell of a cyberpunk action movie.
  • Doctor Strange, the mysterious Sorceror Supreme of the Marvel Universe is crying out for the Tim Burton / Johnny Depp treatment.
  • ... and Marvel Zombies! How can this ingenius mini-series not be turned into a film? It’s got Marvel superheroes as zombies! This may well be my idea of utter perfection.

So yeah; some ridiculousness afoot in the near future I’m sure, but there is still a treasure trove of quality goods to mine. I should stop being bitchy and enjoy it, because I know that Ant-Man or no Ant-Man, I’ll still be forking my money out for anything with the Marvel logo on it. Ultimately, I’ll get whatever I deserve.

 

Tags

Users Comments

Re: Do all superheroes merit movie adaptations?
Posted By stuxmusic 1 May 2, 2007 01:00:17 PM

I always thought Antman was an incredible idea. Mainly because he was the most overlooked, in more ways than size. He's an underdog, someone that marvel themselves would never pick to do a movie on because it wouldn't make them money. Although... I would much rather see Marvel Zombies and then the follow up 'Marvel Zombies Vs Army Of Darkness' I mean, c'mon. Bruce Mofoin' Campbell!

Re: Do all superheroes merit movie adaptations?
Posted By Maxwell 1 May 2, 2007 01:10:49 PM

I'm amazed nobody has done Rogue Trooper from 2000AD....yet But please Sarah, don't tell Uwe Boll whatever you do!

Re: Do all superheroes merit movie adaptations?
Posted By toneee 1 May 4, 2007 11:21:02 AM

What about Bananman: The Movie. I nominate Elijah Wood for Eric, and Daniel Craig to play the man of... er, banana.

Re: Do all superheroes merit movie adaptations?
Posted By Robmac 1 May 15, 2007 02:01:57 PM

In my opinion Marvel are running out of 'good' superheroes that can be done in a reasonable budget. Admittedly if they had infinite money they could try and get the Ultimates on the big screen but once we have had Cap and Iron Man movies thats ya lot from Marvels biggest guns. We have had the X-Men, Spiderman, FF and erm...Blade... so who have they got left? Sub Mariner.. which could be ok, but not really a 'named' hero, the Defenders, Alpha Flight, Cloak and Dagger, Nick Fury all of these could be great TV shows but none really has Blockbuster written on them. Whereas DC has Captain Marvel (Ironic really), 4th World - which would be great, Wonder Woman, Flash and Green Lantern all to get through before they get to the second stringers.
Post a Comment
Security Code* Get another image
 
 
Marvel zombies Marvel superheroes as zombies. Could anything on Earth be more genius?
Untitled Document

Follow Den of Geek on

Related Articles
  • Forbrush Man - as played by Paul Giamatti?
    Forbrush Man - as played by Paul Giamatti?
  • Moleman - as played by Paul Giamatti?
    Mole Man - as played by Paul Giamatti?
  • The Savage Dragon - as played by Paul Giamatti?
    The Savage Dragon - as played by... okay, enough now.

SEARCH

Coke Zero
Advertisement