Den of Geek

Spider-Man 3: 3 stars


Spider-Man's back on the big screen, which is awesome no matter what happens in the movie. Isn't it?

Published on May 6, 2007

I'm blogging this instead of writing a real review because at this point I'm not really able to be objective. Watching Spider-Man webslinging around on a massive screen - and fighting Venom, at that - is great fun in my book, so no matter how bad the film was, I probably would have enjoyed it anyway...

And I did enjoy it. It's a little overlong, it's a little overwrought, and there are too many villains. The Sandman, basically, is pointless, and the resolution of his story is more than a little morally questionable; but the special effects are breathtaking, which makes up for it.

There are plot inconsistencies, there are really silly moments, and Venom's tongue is entirely absent.

But I still really enjoyed this movie, from start to finish.

Most other film critics seem to be coming to similar conclusions: it's a three star movie, there's some wasted potential, it's a bit overlong and some of it should just have been written out. But at the end of the day, it's fun. Which is all anyone should ever ask of a summer superhero movie.

And that new trailer for Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer looked wicked.

 

Tags

Users Comments

Re: Spider-Man 3: 3 stars
Posted By RonHogan 1 May 7, 2007 12:47:15 PM

Bleh, terribly handled film. The Sandman was wasted, Osborne's story was rushed to a finish, and don't even get me started on Emo-Spider (Though I know you loved that part, I'm sure).

Re: Spider-Man 3: 3 stars
Posted By sarahofthedead 1 May 7, 2007 12:49:48 PM

Harry 9-lives Osborne, you mean? Oh well.
Post a Comment
Security Code* Get another image
 
 
Spider-Man Spider-Man 3: 3/5
Untitled Document

Follow Den of Geek on

SEARCH

Coke Zero
Advertisement